T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1165.1 | I don't have one but... | MCIS5::WOOLNER | Photographer is fuzzy, underdeveloped and dense | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:10 | 5 |
| I'm just trying to picture a scenario where you'd need it! (I'm not
anti-protection, I'm just in a wierd mood where the first image that
came to mind was a kid in a snowbank bursting into flames... :-) )
Leslie
|
1165.2 | | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:16 | 2 |
| How about a cold, wet kid coming inside and standing too close to
the wood stove / fireplace to warm up?
|
1165.3 | | WMOIS::BARR_L | And she's not even blond! | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:19 | 6 |
| re: .2
One would tend to think if the child is cold and wet, s/he would take
the snow suit off first before standing next to a wood stove/fireplace.
Lori B.
|
1165.4 | Get the picture? | HEADER::STS_SS | | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:23 | 11 |
| Well, since you asked, last year at the Deerfield Fair, my girlfriend's
daughter (4 years old) was walking through the crowd and someone with a
cigarette in hand put a nice burn in the back of her jacket. If it had
been a flammable material, she might have been seriously burned. I'm
trying to protect my daughter the best way I can and since I'm not with
her 24 hours a day, I can't prevent the same thing from happening to
her at daycare or in a shopping mall or wherever she may be this winter
in the close proximity of an inconsiderate smoker.
Sally.
|
1165.5 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:34 | 5 |
| I've only heard of fire-retardant treatment for sleepwear. Nylon, which is what
the outer shell of most kids' outerwear is made of, will melt but tends not to
burn.
Steve
|
1165.6 | GRRRRRRRRRR | NEWPRT::WAHL_RO | | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:55 | 10 |
|
re .4
Flame on
Did you find the smoker and burn them with a cigarette?
Flame off
Rochelle
|
1165.7 | Back to the original question... | HEADER::STS_SS | | Wed Oct 09 1991 14:25 | 10 |
| Unfortunately, we didn't notice the burn mark until we were on the way
home. Thank God it didn't touch her long blonde hair. It was pretty
scarey to see the burn and realize what could have happened. So, now
that I've justified my question, does anyone know of any brands that
use fire-retardant. If not, I'll use the suggestion from .5 and choose
materials that don't burn easily, nylon was a good suggestion since it
tends to melt rather than flare up.
Thanks,
Sally.
|
1165.8 | Call toll-free and find out?? | ICS::NELSONK | | Wed Oct 09 1991 16:16 | 26 |
| No, I don't, unfortunately. I would think that most reputable
brands, like London Fog, Oshkosh, etc., would have *some* kind of
finish on it. Would the waterproofing make it more or less flammable?
I'm no chemist (*there's* an understatement!) but maybe someone
knows?
You might want to try calling either the manufacturer(s) of the
snowsuit(s) you are interested in, or the Consumer Product Safety
Commission. I think CPSC has a toll-free 800 number, maybe the
manufacturers do as well. To find out, call toll-free director
assistance, 1-800-555-1212.
Good luck!
And while we're on the subject of outerwear for kids, does anyone
know what sort of outerwear I should buy/beg/borrow for my 3-month-
old? She could wear her big brother's snowsuit, a 18-month size
London Fog that is absolutely enormous; or should I get her a
winter jacket of some sort and save the snowsuit for the really
vile weather? I also have an acrylic bunting-type thing she could
wear; again, it's pretty big.
Jeez, I thought I'd have this all nailed down, this being my second
child and all...
Thank you, .0, for a good question!
|
1165.9 | A Sack for an infant | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Wed Oct 09 1991 18:07 | 12 |
| The neatest thing I've seen for a baby for winter, was a hand-made
'sack' type-thing. If you can sew AT ALL, you should be able to do it
without much trouble.
The whole thing is rather roomy, 'pockets' for sleeves, a sack for the
feet, with a special cut and something along the idea of a GIANT button
hole for the car seat strap to pass through. The might have been a
hood attached. Zippered up the front, but you could make it button,
snap, whatever you like. It was a CINCH to plop the kid in and out of
it, and her mother SWORE by it!
|
1165.10 | responses from the firefighter/husband/dad | MCIS5::TRIPP | | Thu Oct 10 1991 15:35 | 27 |
| Here's a few thoughts from my husband, the firefighter, who also works
for this fine company doing Environmental/health/fire prevention
issues.....
As for children's clothing, none within his knowledge are actually
fireproofed. However his suggestion for material less likely to flame
is 100% pure wool. History on this is that when he was in England and
worked closely with their firefighters, the Brittish used 100% pure
wool coats to fight fires, it tends to char and flake off, as opposed
to acutally burning. He strongly suggested staying away from man made
materials, such as nylon since it will melt, and of course adhere to
any exposed skin like shrink wrap, and stay hot much longer, plus they
generally are petroleum based which equates to higher flamability.
His thoughts on whether the waterproofing would help or not in
preventing the clothing from catching fire is that most likely
waterproofing would accelerate catching on fire.
Generally, and he's talking NFPA (nat'l fire prevention assn) standards
for his answers. He said about all that's required to be
"fire-proofed" is children's sleepwear, and tags should state it as
such. Some home furnishing such as drapes and stuffed furniture is
also treated for fire proofing, although not required by law.
Lyn
(the firefighter's wife)
probably excellerate
|