[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Parenting |
Notice: | READ 1.27 BEFORE WRITING |
Moderator: | CSC32::DUBOIS |
|
Created: | Wed May 30 1990 |
Last Modified: | Tue May 27 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1364 |
Total number of notes: | 23848 |
1111.0. "Personal support improves labor/delivery outcomes" by MOIRA::FAIMAN (light upon the figured leaf) Tue Aug 27 1991 10:50
The following item is from the _Harvard Health Letter_, volume 16,
number 10 (August 1991). I find the statistics here rather
astonishing. Is it just my cynicism that makes me suspect that expect
that if it were a drug, a machine, or a medical procedure that showed
these sorts of results, instead of a human being who might be perceived
as diluting the doctor's or hospital's authority, it would by now be a
routine part of the birthing process?
-Neil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor Intensive
Is there a low-cost, low-risk intervention that can shorten labor,
reduce the need for anesthetics and caesarean delivery, and decrease
the rate of complications in both babies and mothers? A recent study
conducted at the Jefferson Davis hospital in Houston, Texas, suggests
that a supportive female companion can fill the bill -- and lower it,
as well.
John Kennell and colleagues studied 412 healthy women who were
hospitalized to deliver their first child. These women were randomly
assigned to "supported" and "observed" groups; 212 were supported
throughout labor and delivery by an experienced mother, or "doula," who
soothed, touched, and encouraged them, explaining the process along the
way. The doula kept a record of medical interventions, procedures
used, and the patient's contact with hospital staff. Similar
information was gathered for another 200 women by an observer who never
spoke to the patients and attempted to remain inconspicuous.
Supported women spent less time in labor (and average of 7.4 hours, as
opposed to 8.4 hours), and fewer of them (17%, vs. 23%) required
oxytocin to strengthen their contractions. Among patients who
delivered their babies vaginally, spinal anesthesia was necessary in
only 8% of the supported group, as opposed to 23% of the observed
group. Fewer supported women required cesarean sections (8%, vs. 13%)
or forceps deliveries (8%, vs. 21%). After birth, supported patients
were far less likely to run a fever (1%, vs. 7%), and only 10% of their
infants (vs. 17%) were kept in the hospital for medical reasons. A
control group of 204 women (for whom no observer was present) scored
measurably worse than did the observed one, indicating that the
presence of an attentive onlooker was not without effect.
These figures, together wuth results from two earlier studies done in
Guatemala by Dr. Kennell and colleagues, indicate that continuous
support from a doula during labor provides physical and emotional
benefits for mothers and health bonuses for their babies. With less
medical intervention, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays,
there may be financial savings as well. Although a male partner can
fulfill a similar role -- and his help is important to the mother -- no
randomized study has produced similar results from such a partner's
presence. (_JAMA_, May 1, 1991, pp 2197-2201.)
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1111.1 | Amazing the credence we give to drugs but not people | WINDY::SHARON | Sharon Starkston | Tue Aug 27 1991 12:25 | 5 |
| Thanks for posting this informative study. I plan to look into a midwife
or doula to help support my next labor though I will likely have a conventional
hospital birthing room with an OB.
=ss
|
1111.2 | Midwife all the way | MIVC::MTAG | | Tue Aug 27 1991 16:51 | 10 |
| I had a somewhat normal pregnancy and my hard labor was 3 hours. I had
a normal delivery, no forcepts used, no fever afterwards, and there
were absolutely no problems with my daughter. I attribute a lot of
this to my midwife practice, and my midwife was with me through labor
when I was in the hospital, encouraging me all the way. My husband was
also present, but the soothing experience of my midwife is what got me
through the labor. I will go to them again with my second child.
Mary
|
1111.3 | Let's have a party! | SHIPS::GORE_I | Bar sinister with pedant rampant | Wed Aug 28 1991 05:30 | 7 |
|
Both my sons were born in a teaching hospital (St Mary's,
Portsmouth) and, in my naivity, I thought it was *normal* to have at
least a student midwife in attendance throughout! The support and
encouragement provided is invaluable to both parents.
Ian G.
|