T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1023.1 | Maybe time for a change | WR2FOR::BELINSKY_MA | | Wed Jul 10 1991 15:06 | 38 |
| I can only offer an objective opinion because my daughter is still
a baby and we haven't encountered this type of situation yet. But your
note prompted some very strong ideas about childcare.
It appears that Ann and Austin are being raised under totally different
styles of parenting, one being much more lenient than the other in
terms of discipline. I happen to agree more with your style of
encouraging sharing, displaying appropriate behavior, and not giving in
to every whim. But there is more going on here.
The first thing to look for in any childcare situation is that the
caregiver share the same ideas on discipline and values as the parents
do. While you may in general like the care that your mother-in-law
provides, it appears that your parenting styles are different.
It's not clear to me that Austin will be harmed by Ann's behavior. If
he were in any other day care situation there may very well be another
child that acts the same way. However, he is not in general day care,
he is with relatives. If Ann acts this way and gets away with it, then
Austin will probably be allowed to do whatever he wants also. And
Austin would probably benefit from having someone else to play with.
It may be time to reevaluate the situation and move Austin to a place
where he will have other children his age to play with. It seems that
your mother-in-law has her hands full, maybe more than is best for the
children.
Just my opinion, but I react strongly to this type of day care -
especially when one grandparent is being asked to care for so many
children. There is a lot of pressure on her to be a grandparent, and
at the same time she has all the demands of a licensed family day care
situation.
You know the situation best, and should go with your own instincts.
Also, how do you feel after haveing a day ot two to calm down and think
about it?
Mary
|
1023.2 | | BRAT::DISMUKE | | Wed Jul 10 1991 15:24 | 11 |
| I would suggest a conversation with the care provider (M-I-L) to see
what her reaction is to things that go on at the house during the day.
The way you described the situation, I was led to believe that Grandma
gave in to Ann because of the reaction/attitude of Ann's mother. She
didn't want the mother as the enemy.
If it turns out that mother-in-law doesn't make the odds a little
fairer during the day, then you have something to be concerned about.
-sandy
|
1023.3 | Son is fine, but watch out for sister-in-law | MCIS2::TAYLOR | | Wed Jul 10 1991 15:44 | 10 |
| I wouldn't worry about Austin. He's not going to suffer at all, in
fact I think his day care arrangement is almost ideal (it would be
totally ideal if not for those days when all the children are there-
5 kids is kind of alot). The only problem I see is between you and
your sister in law (Ann's mom). I don't blame you for being upset, I'd
have been furious too. All I can suggest is that in your house you
set the rules: if little Ann misbehaves you take charge. Outside
your house you have to decide whether to keep still and keep the peace
or risk a family feud (I assume from your note that talking to Ann's
mom doesn't work). But, again, I wouldn't worry about Austin.
|
1023.4 | It's always hard dealing with the in-laws!! | VMSDEV::FERLAN | System Availability Development | Wed Jul 10 1991 15:47 | 30 |
|
As hard as it is to, Anne needs to be told in a polite voice as possible
(first) that those were Austin's gifts and that he was going to open
them in his own time (however long that was)... I've seen a similar
circumstance to yours with some friends of ours ... Our friend's
daughter took her time opening gifts and the sister-in-law's son
was in a hurry (much the same as your situation as I see it)... Well
our friend told her nephew (nicely at first) that the gifts belonged
to her daughter and that he was not to open them.. Well of course he
persisted, and her warnings thus became more severe... I don't remember
how the sister-in-law reacted the boy did eventually stop...
I know noone wants to alienate family, but the other parents have got
to understand that their parenting style is different from yours and
that since it is your child's birthday you make the rules... As for
your M-I-L, she's wrong.. To me it appears she is trying to play favorites
which in the long run will have a negative impact.
As for changing daycare, I don't know... That's a tough call, but it
might be interesting to find out if this is how all incidents are
handled... You should be able to also explain to your son the
situation and explain that Anne isn't as 'disciplined' (without saying
she's a brat ;-))...
Just my opinions...
John
|
1023.5 | | SOJU::MCCARTHY | | Wed Jul 10 1991 15:52 | 17 |
|
Deep down, I know that my m-i-l is a fair person and I don't think
she would bow down to Ann. Also, I know that our parenting styles are quite
similar just from talking to her. She has mentioned more than once that she
does not agree with the way Ann's mother is bringing up Ann and has even gone
as far to say that she is glad she has Ann five days a week because she is at
least being disciplined by her. That is why this whole birthday scene threw
me for a loop.
I guess what is really bugging me the way Ann is unkind to Austin and
again, I'll bet my m-i-l does not condone that in any way, but I'm sure it
still happens. (I guess I sound like an over-protective mother) I just
don't want the main person that my son interacts with during the day to be
unpleasant and fresh to him. I'm afraid this will either make him think it
is okay to be fresh or make him wary of people in general.
thanks for these and any more opinions-----------MM
|
1023.6 | I know what you're going through.. | GEMINI::NICKERSON | | Wed Jul 10 1991 15:54 | 31 |
| This one's a toughie because I can understand what you're feeling and
the painful process of decision making. I have a neighbor who is
raising her son much the way your in-laws are raising their daughter
(see Neighbor Problems note for a more detailed explanation). My
neighbors son and mine were all at the same in-home day care provider
when they were younger. The day care person is not a relative of
either party. I had many concerns with my sons and the neighbors child
but after talking to my provider, she assured me that she had the kid
pegged and he didn't get away with things at her house. Of course, she
could be objective as neither child was hers. I, personally, wouldn't
use a relative as the primary day-care person. As ideal as it seems in
the beginning, it can only lead to the doubts and problems you're now
experiencing. I'm sure many people were able to have relatives watch
their kids with great success but the downside is too hard for the
family.
I'm rambling here but I just feel so badly for you. Finding a new
provider is a MAJOR pain - I had to go through it once several years
ago and NEVER want to do it again (I ended up back with my old provider
after 3 months of shuffling the kids to three other people). The only
reason I had to leave my regular was her mothers illness.
I don't know the relationship you have with your m-i-l. I think a real
heart-to-heart is called for between the two of you. I can understand
her wanting to keep peace at the birthday party but would be concerned
if your sis-in-law started making demands on her for the daycare piece.
Is this her daughter or daughter-in-law? My sis-in-law makes all kinds
of demands on her mother which I would NEVER make.
Good luck with whatever decision you reach. I wouldn't suggest too
many "family gatherings" unless they can't be avoided for awhile!
|
1023.7 | kids know what they can get away with | TIPTOE::STOLICNY | | Wed Jul 10 1991 15:59 | 9 |
|
Personally, I'd bet that Ann behaves quite differently at daycare than
she does when her mother is around. Children just know whose chains
they can yank and I think Ann probably knows she can't get away with
the nasty behaviour at your mother-in-laws. If all other aspects
of your daycare arrangements are good, then I'd stick with it if it
were me.
Carol
|
1023.8 | both outlaws | SOJU::MCCARTHY | | Wed Jul 10 1991 16:09 | 9 |
| Myself and Ann's mother are both daughter-in-laws.
I'd love to have a heart-to-heart with my mother-in-law about this, in fact
we are pretty close and have had deep discussions in the past on other subjects.
But those conversations just sort of happened. I don't know how to bring this
up without putting her on the defensive.
any suggestions??------MM
|
1023.9 | what's she like AT daycare ? | ISLNDS::JANCAITIS | Que sera, sera | Wed Jul 10 1991 16:13 | 35 |
| re: .0
As others have said here, what you really need to be concerned about is
your m-i-l's attitude/style in the daycare situation. I know you
described how Ann treated Austin while you were in a full-family
situation (in Maine, at the birthday party) but in both of the
instances, Ann's parents were around and she probably knows she can
"get away with it".....have you ever had the opportunity/time to
observe the kids together when they're with your m-i-l without Ann's
parents there ??
IMO, I'd spend some time observing the kids together, as unobtrusively
as possible, while they're in the daycare situation, as well as your
m-i-l's reaction if some of the behavior you described occurs. Once
you can see how they get along without the parents around and how your
m-i-l handles it, maybe it'll be a little clearer what, if anything,
you need to do.
as far as family gatherings, I'd do as one noter suggested and maybe
hold off on any more for a while unless you can't avoid it. But if you
do have get-togethers, tak to your m-i-l beforehand about what happened
at the birthday party and why......maybe the two of you working
together can help both kids and Ann's parents.
Finally, when it comes to sharing, the attitude (only being nice if she
wants to), I keep reminding my son that, just because s/he does it,
doesn't make it "ok" for him to do/not do it......yes, his feelings
have been hurt by other kids' actions in the past, but as long as he
continues to get positive reinforcement from other areas, he'll be ok.
best of luck to you.....it's a tough situation and I hope it works out
for you.
Debbi
|
1023.10 | having been on the other end | TLE::RANDALL | | Wed Jul 10 1991 16:56 | 20 |
| It's also possible that Ann, being in a stressful situation with
the whole family around, and off her own territory, reacted with
what I think is called "acting-out" behavior, converting her fears
and discomforts into anger, rudeness, and general misconduct.
It's entirely possible that *she* behaves differently in the
daycare situation on your mother-in-law's territory.
I remember my in-laws' 50th anniversary a couple of years ago when
Steven was 4 and the terror of the party -- I try to forget, but
some things are engraved permanently on the brain :) Steven was
an unholy terror; if we tried to discipline him, m-i-l complained
about our being mean to him, if we didn't, s-i-l complained he was
picking on her kid. It got to where we could only say, "Hang on,
it will be over in 26 hours," or however long we had left.
But as soon as we got home, he was fine. In fact, as soon as we
were close enough to leaving that he could comprehend it -- "we're
going home in the morning" -- he was fine.
--bonnie
|
1023.11 | Mom and Dad make the rules! | NEWPRT::WAHL_RO | | Wed Jul 10 1991 19:24 | 39 |
|
My parents have "babysat" their 5 grandkids for 12 years now. [Never
all 5 at once though!]
I've observed that when Grams,Gramps and mom and dad are all together,
there is some confusion over who sets the limits. The kids all seem to
act-out in one way or another and competing for Grandma's attention
seems to be the primary goal. {Even my darlings!} My children know Dad
and I set the limits and there will be no schmoozing grandparents to get
what you want, aka "The United Front".
I could have written this basenote last year! My niece's name is also
Ann. (we called her the terrorist!) My son is kind of unaggressive and
introverted. He ~was~ an easy target for Ann! She was his first real
exposure to aggression.
Ann's parents had a messy separation and divorce, when Ann and Dad were
around, we endured some pretty dreadful family gatherings.
Like you, I was concerned about my son Sean adopting her behaviors when she
was acting-out. Sean is 3 years younger, she's big for her age, he's
little, etc.. She often converted her behavior into violence toward Sean.
We let everyone know [my parents, Ann, Ann's parents] that any form of
violence is unacceptable and if it didn't stop we would find other
daycare. This caused some hurt feelings, but the violence stopped.
It also became clear who was in control. [Mom and Dad]
Sean has had to learn to deal with other aggressive kids, they're
everywhere. Ann gave him a good head start. She's now 9 and he's
6, they have learned to tolerate each other. I believe this is because
WE [not her parents] set limits and stuck to them.
Rochelle
|
1023.12 | This is not a "style of parenting" | CLUSTA::BINNS | | Thu Jul 11 1991 09:36 | 4 |
| I'd say Ann is in big, big trouble, for which she can thank her
parents' completely bizarre behavior.
Kit
|
1023.13 | No harm done | SCAACT::COX | Dallas ACT Data Ctr Mgr | Thu Jul 11 1991 10:33 | 20 |
| I wouldn't think Austin will be harmed by his exposure to Ann, as long as he
has plenty of opportunity to interact with other children who are more kind,
etc.......
Regarding the party: how did Austin feel about having his presents opened?
He may still be too young to make a big deal of *opening* (notice I didn't
say PLAYING WITH) his presents. If it made Ann happy and didn't make Austin
mad, then no harm done. Sounds like the only one really upset was yourself.
If, on the other hand, Austin didn't like it, then EARLY intervention was/is
in order. Ask her once to stop. If she doesn't, then TELL her to stop. If
she doesn't then remove the presents from her and hand them to Austin yourself.
It may make Ann's mother angry, but it leaves your m.i.l. out of the loop and
keeps Austin happy.
FWIW,
Kristen
P.S. Did she really bring a wrapped present for her own daughter????? Wow!
Perhaps she thought party favors would be overlooked?
|
1023.14 | Try this approach? | GEMINI::NICKERSON | | Thu Jul 11 1991 10:52 | 18 |
| Maybe you could open a conversation with your MIL by talking about what
a nice time you had on vacation with the family and getting around to
the birthday party. Just casually mention how Ann was opening the
presents and you had really wanted Austin to open the presents
(particularly the ones from your MIL). Maybe at this point your MIL
will jump in and let you know her feelings on the subject. If she
doesn't, you can judge her reactions so far and either end the
discussion if you think she's getting defensive or continue on if she
seems receptive. With this approach you're not attacking her in any
way, you're starting the conversation out on a positive note and you
have the opportunity to see what her feelings are. I know I can always
tell when my MIL is getting upset about something I'm saying so I
usually change the subject.
If you want to take this approach it should probably be done soon -
while the whole incident is still fresh in everyone's mind.
Good luck!
|
1023.15 | I know it sounds unbelievable........... | SOJU::MCCARTHY | | Thu Jul 11 1991 11:23 | 21 |
| I know that Ann's parents behavior sounds really unbelievable, I spent
the whole week of our vacation in a daze, wondering how they could not realize
the harm they were doing. Who knows, maybe everything will turn out fine for
Ann? Her mom is truly one of the sweetest and kindest people I know with more
patience than Job, which makes it all so much more bizzarre.
re: .13 Yes, she really did bring a gift for Ann to Austin's party.
That made me feel more sorry for Ann than angry.
All in all, your responses have made me feel much better. I forget
sometimes that Austin is no longer a baby but a person in his own right and
though he is laid-back he has a strong personality and is pretty stubborn when
the issue at hand really matters to him. In other words, to some extent he
can probably stand up for himself more now and I should probably let him.
And maybe when he sees my m-i-l reprimand Ann for bad behavior, he realizes
that that is not acceptable.
Wouldn't you think that we would have a behavior problem by now if
Ann were affecting Austin? (they've been together since 6 mos.)
thanks for all the replies--------MM
|
1023.16 | | IRONIC::BRINDISI | | Thu Jul 11 1991 13:08 | 33 |
| This is in response to the basenoter, without looking at other notes
(no time).
1. Situation detrimental to Austin? This is the way life is. There
are selfish people, unselfish people, good people and bad people.
2. Self esteem? I think it would take a heck of a lot more than an
untamed 3 year old to create a low self esteem in another toddler.
3. Pre-school? 50% of his class might be just like Ann!!
4. Mother-in-law? If she is the nice person you say she is, I would
let it go. She probably felt uncomfortable in the situation and maybe
felt she caused it.
I really feel that kids need to work these situations out on their own.
I don't think it's detrimental to them to be in this negative
situation (i.e., a spoiled child). On the contrary, maybe it's good
for them to decide on their own if they want to get out of the situation.
Maybe if they are pulled out of the situation by the parent time after
time, when they are in the situation without the parent around, it will
only be worse (i.e., no one to help them). On the other hand, in an
isolated incident such as the gift stuff, I would have spoke up and asked
sis-in-law to hold on to Ann as it is Austins day!
This is all my personal opinion and the way I prefer to parent.
Remember everybody is different!!! Especially when it comes to
parenting.
Good luck in your decision!
Joyce
|
1023.17 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | The U word makes me c-sick! | Thu Jul 11 1991 16:27 | 29 |
| > 1. Situation detrimental to Austin? This is the way life is. There
> are selfish people, unselfish people, good people and bad people.
>
> 2. Self esteem? I think it would take a heck of a lot more than an
> untamed 3 year old to create a low self esteem in another toddler.
In terms of detrimental, I think that if the adults around forever condoned
and even displayed this kind of behaviour, rather than the children, then
this would have and effect on behaviour and self-esteem.
Another point about sharing ...
Something I read somewhere ... you cannot and should not force a child to
share; it will only create terrible resentment. (Remember your own youth
and being forced to share ?) What you should do is encourage sharing, but
if a child refuses to share on first request then don't push it. After
all the object in question does belong to the child. The only case where
you should force the issue a little more is for items belonging to two +
children, but even then children will have a way of working this out on
their own. I will now, for example, tell my kids, when fightinng over an
object: "I don't like this fighting over 'x'. You will have to try to
work out a sharing arrangement that you can both be happy with for now.
I know that you can do it because you've done it before. If you cannot
work out an arrangement, then I'll take 'x' until you can." That usually
produces good results!
Stuart
|
1023.18 | good point | TLE::RANDALL | | Fri Jul 12 1991 11:37 | 6 |
| Good point, Stuart.
I certainly wouldn't force my children to share their toys with a
child who wasn't willing to share back.
--bonnie
|
1023.19 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | The U word makes me c-sick! | Fri Jul 12 1991 13:28 | 13 |
| Another good point! Sharing, when you think about it is a decidedly
un-natural act, until we learn trust. Remember for a young child,
to share something is almost the same as giving it away. Like mommy
disappearing behind the shower curtain is the same as mommy gone away!
So, while children will trust implicity a donor, they will similarly
implicity distrust a taker!
That kind of trust has to be learned ... and there are enough people
out there to make that kind of trust very hard to learn even into
adulthood! There are still a number of people that I wouldn't trust
to loan any of my tools to!
Stuart
|
1023.20 | Use the situation to teach lessons! | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Fri Jul 12 1991 23:42 | 25 |
| We have a similar situation at our daycare with a *VERY* spoiled little
boy (4 yrs). He thinks *HE* is the center of the universe. Sometimes
he is nice to my boys, but for the most part he yells and screams and
gets just what he wants -- much to everyone's frustration (including
Mom).
The babysitter is *WONDERFUL*, and the boys love her almost as much as
she loves them, so we'd never DREAM of changing. HOWEVER - we *DO*
make a big deal about Patrick, and we use the opportunity to point out
that if he continues with this behaviour he won't have many friends
when he gets bigger and if he doesn't listen to big people (which he
doesn't), that he'll end up getting in BIG trouble. The boys are old
enough to understand that, while Patrick is a good person, he can be
very mean, and some of the things that he does are very bad.
Use Ann as an example - don't hide the truth from Austin. If he wants
to know how come she's so mean to him, just tell him that maybe it's
because no one ever taught her how to be nice ... or maybe (???) it's
because no one is very nice to her??? (at home). Try to find out why
she acts like that - Austin should be able to understand. OR, if she's
just a brat, you can tell him that sometimes she just acts like a brat.
Of course, expect all of this to get back to Ann, and her mom ....
Good Luck!!
Patty
|
1023.21 | | CGVAX2::HIGGINS_C | | Mon Jul 15 1991 14:13 | 20 |
|
I would talk to your m-i-l and find out her feelings towards the way
Ann is being brought up. I am sure she isn't too happy about it but,
she only has her so many hours of the day and the rest of the time she
is with her parents.
I have my f-i-l babysit for my three children. There are seven
grandchildren in all. Sometimes he could have all seven but, I know
they are all treated equally. Him having all seven only happens once
in a while. I know how my in-laws are raising their children and we
are all basically doing it the same. The one thing we all do is make
them share and if we see something happening and it is wrong in our
book they do take a time out (whether it is our kid or not).
I wouldn't have let Ann open any of the presents. I had this situation
happen and stopped it because I knew that the girl wouldn't have let my
son help her open her presents.
carol
|
1023.22 | OK kids, let's LINE UP! | CALS::JENSEN | | Mon Jul 15 1991 16:19 | 45 |
|
Well, I put this one "on hold" for a while but these latest responses have
prompted me to "go for it"!
At Juli's first birthday party, she could care less if she received ONE
GIFT! She was too caught up in the balloons, excitement, people, activity,
and spotlight to understand OR CARE about the gifts (which I felt a little
badly for the people who brought the gifts and were very anxiously waiting
for Juli to take an interest in them ... HOWEVER, I knew even if we had
spread this birthday party over THREE LONG DAYS, Juli would still be
TOTALLY DIS-interested in her gifts) ... So-ooo
I asked the "attendees" (of adults AND KIDS!) if anyone objected to lining
up volunteer-kids (each picking out a present, reading the card,
opening the gift and then getting back in line and letting the next kid
"take a turn"." I think the people who brought the gifts would much rather
have seen their gift(s) opened, displayed and appreciated than to have
packed them away until JULI took an interest (which I truly believe
would never have happened on her birth-DAY!).
Of the 25 adults and 20 kids (or whatever the numbers were), I had NO
OBJECTIONS ... least of all from Juli! ... and everyone seemed
thrilled and happy about "sharing" IN THE FESTIVITIES of the ocassion.
If Juli had said "no, they are MY presents and only I CAN OPEN THEM ..."
then fine, she has that right. But since it didn't phase me/Jim/Juli
and the "crowd" had no objections ... then we just got ALL the other kids
involved. The kids just loved it!!!! And many a proud parent looked on.
From-someone-who-just-loves-audience-participation!
Dottie ||
||
\/
PS: Jim/I were also labeled "crazy" for putting "and family" on all our
wedding invitations ... and THEN WE called all the kids forward to
cut THEIR VERY OWN piece of cake (baker had a heart-attack on this one!)
... THEN my flower girl handed out a small hand-made Christmas ornament
to each and every kid who came to our wedding ... The photographer had
his hands full trying to capture each kid cutting the cake with the
Bride and Groom, not to mention each kid trying to dance with the Bride.
I have a precious picture of Jim cutting in on a 3-year old!
.... And I now have a priceless video of my daughter's 1st birthday ...
and she's not the only kid who was there HAVING A GOOD TIME!
|
1023.23 | | BUNYIP::QUODLING | I'll have some of what Marketing is Smoking... | Fri Jul 19 1991 12:26 | 17 |
| We had a similar situation at my son's 3rd birthday, but he took things
in control, and took his presents to each of the other kids, and said
here, help me open this. We ended up with a bunch of happy-ish kids,
far from the tears and screaming that had occured at one of his friends
birthday parties a few weeks before.
One of the mothers of a friend of our son's once said that she intends
that her child be a "free spirit", and that she would not impose any
restriction on her child. To quote her own words, "he can jump on the
dining room table if he likes". I asked her how she felt other people
would feel at her lack of regard for their personal property when she
took her son visiting. She hadn't thought of it, but couldn't see the
problem. No-one in that family will get an invite to our house,
again...
Peter Q.
|
1023.24 | Someone else's house=Their house rules!! | JAWS::TRIPP | | Mon Aug 05 1991 16:40 | 36 |
| Excuse me for asking, but am I the only one who believes in the rule
that if you're in someone else's home, you adhere to that person's
house rules? I interpret this as being if I am a guest at someone
else's party, then not only do I adhere to my normal rules of behavior
but I also don't touch anything, this includes someone else's birthday
presents, in my host/hostess's home, and I adhere to THEIR house rules!
From personal experience, my mother in law stopped me shortly after our
arrival from disciplining our son. I guess I was anticipating
unacceptable behavior. She told me in no uncertain terms that this is
her house and if he wanted to act as a brat then he could. Well it
took me back a couple steps, but I respected her wishes and let him do
what he wanted that day, short of doing something harmful to himself.
I do have a niece who is "aggressive", for lack of not know what else
to call her. She is almost 2 years older than AJ and has at every
party tried to tell me when to open presents, cut the cake etc. I
handled it as nicely as I could last year, after she asked me the
umteenth time if it was time to do [whatever, cake presents etc], I
asked her simply who's party is this, she responded it was AJ's, I told
her since it was his party then AJ and his family will set the rules
for who does what and when. You could tell she's very materialistic,
like HER mother, the first thing we did at her party last week was open
presents, but never all day did we here a thank you, to any of the gift
givers. I have had to stop her at several occations (Christmas,
birthday etc) from opening AJ's presents.
I do disagree with bringing a present for your own to someone else's
party. But what I do generally try to do if there is another child in
the family, is to wrap a small present to the "non-birthday child",so
they can feel like someone remembered they exist too, and they too get
a present to unwrap. Does anyone think there's anything wrong with
this practice. (I've done it not only for birthdays, but Christenings,
and other special occations).
Lyn
|
1023.25 | | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Tue Aug 06 1991 10:25 | 21 |
| I'd have to disagree more than agree with Lyn in .24. If I have rules
for my child, then I expect her to obey those rules, regardless of where
we are. If we're in someone else's house, then that person has the right
to set "house rules;" but those rules may augment, but don't override, our
family behavior rules.
On the other hand, if we're talking about rules about "how to behave when
you're a guest", then I would agree that the host's rules should take
precedence.
For example, if we had a family rule, "no candy before meals", then I
would expect my child to obey that rule, even if offered candy by someone
we're visiting; but if we had a rule, "don't climb on other people's
furniture", then the host could certainly say "It's ok to climb on my
furniture".
That is, if it's a matter between my child and the host, then the host
set's the rules; but if it's a general behavior issue, then my rules
still hold.
-Neil
|