T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
923.1 | 3 as cheap as 2? NO WAY!!! | ELMAGO::PHUNTLEY | | Fri May 24 1991 13:43 | 31 |
| Boy, to sit and figure out these expenses was a real shocker--I
had never actually looked at it all on paper!! The following are
the average expenses for my almost two year old son, and they would
probably be much higher but he gets many of his clothes and toys
from his grandparents (only grandbaby!!!:})
Housing = $210 month (1/3 of house payment but we would have this
expense anyway)
Food = 20-30 week (this is just things we buy for him like
snacks, Hi-C juices, etc.)
Formula for his first year was 15-20/week
Health = 11 week for insurance plan
8 month vitamins
30 yr. prescriptions
Toys = 200 year between birthdays, Christmas, etc.
Entmnt. = 100 year birthday party
20 month for balloons, amusement park, swimming (most
places he is still free)
Daycare = 80 week
Clothing= 20-30 month for essentials (shoes, socks, etc. --Nana
buys 95% of his clothes)
Diapers = 50 month
Life ins= 30 month (2 policies)
US bonds= 10 month (bought in his name for future, car,
education,etc.)
Wow!! Who says 3 can live as cheaply as 2??
Pam
|
923.2 | We live really cheap, it seems! | CRONIC::ORTH | | Fri May 24 1991 14:49 | 67 |
| Well, we have 3 children, and will have a fourth in another couple of
weeks. I realize our expenses are probably not typical, but we consider
our kids (so do others) quite well fed, clothed, house, etc. But we
live *much* more cheaply than most.
Our kids are boy, 5 yrs, 9 mos. old
girl, 3 yrs., 11 mos. old
boy, 2 yrs., 1 mon. old
Housing: tough to divide out...Their two rooms are 1/3 of the house,
and then they share "common areas". *BUT*, as previous reply indicated,
we'd pay it all if they weren't here, so they cost us, in actuality, no
more. If we'd had to build on to accomodate them, or buy a bigger house
and therefore have a bigger payment, I'd include that, but they cost us
nothing more in the way of housing.
food: We spend $70 per week on food for our entire family, including
laundry products, and paper goods. So, figure about half of that for
the kids......$35
health: outside of insurance, about $3-$6 a month for office visits
and maybe $10 month for prescriptions. Figure maybe another $5-$10 a
month for stuff like band-aids, tylenol, etc.
toys: Ridiculously little, but that's our tastes. Kids get tons from
relatives, so we spend maybe $15 per child at birthday time, and maybe
$25 per child at Christmas, for $120 per year, or $10 a month.
entertainment: almost nothing. We do the free stuff, and don't buy the
goodies at places we go to. Tops would be $10 a month (okay, maybe
$15-$20 month in summer, counting ice cream!)
daycare: nothing for us. My wife stays home with the kids full time. We
pay maybe $25 a month for babysitters. (Take the kids with us a lot, or
trade babysitting time).
clothing: We buy almost nothing from stores except underwear and shoes.
We shop garage sales from spring till fall, and get given *tons* of
both new and used clothing. Ours kids have more clothes than we can
keep up with, and it is all reasonably new and in really good shape. We
spend, likely, about $200-$250 a year on all of them togehter.
We haven't gotten to the age, yet of intense outside activities,
lessons, etc., so we don't have those expenses, but I see them as being
in line with the rest of the way we spend.
Oh, a couple more things...
Added laundry: Yes, you do tons more laundry with kids! My wife does
about 10-12 loads a week, counting sheets, towels, etc. We also wash
all our own diapers. What does a load cost? I have no idea! Our water
bill is about $20 a month, total. Probably 1/3 of that is laundry. We
wash just about everything in cold water. Dry everything in the dryer.
Electric bill is about $85 a month....maybe $20 of that for laundry?
Soap...one 64 oz bottle of liquid deteg/week at approx $2 a bottle (we
buy the cheap stuff). Total=$35-$40 a month?
Disposable diapers: we use 'em for when we're out. Maybe $15 a month.
(Will increase when baby is born, till #3 is out of diapers).
Two children do not cost 2x as much as 1, and three do not cost a whole
lot more than 2...much equipment, clothing, toys, etc., is shared.
Totals for us for 3 kids: (taking the highs and lows of each item)...
$158-$181 per month, or $1896 - $2172 per year.
Most people will vary... :-)!
--dave--
|
923.3 | ex | GEMVAX::SANTOS | | Fri May 24 1991 15:14 | 22 |
| We have a two year old this was hard to do. Even more shocking after I
got it done. This is done on a monthly bases
Housing 191
food 120
Health 30 Ins. and colds
toys 40 They get bored with toys very easy
Enter. 30 We like the turtles
Day care 500 that is for a home care sitter and all of his
food and snacks
clothing 50 they grow out of there sneakers quick and my son
has very wide and flat feet.
misc. 80 diapers, wipes, toothbrush, shampoo, soap,
lotions,
that is about $1050.00 a month. If you want to look at it this way
that is a house payment.
And number two is on the way Hopefully on time in August.
Della
|
923.4 | | ULTNIX::taber | Position set by lassitude and loungetude | Fri May 24 1991 16:42 | 7 |
| Actually, I've found having kids saves money. When we didn't have
kids, my wife worked and we spent everything the two of us made every
month. Now, she stays home with the kids so our income has been
reduced to about 60% of what it was and we spend everything I make
every month. A savings of 40%!!
>>>==>PStJTT
|
923.5 | | NAVIER::SAISI | | Fri May 24 1991 16:43 | 2 |
| Wow Dave, that is impressive budgeting!
Linda
|
923.6 | just curious | WR2FOR::BELINSKY_MA | | Fri May 24 1991 20:42 | 5 |
| No one has asked yet, but I'm curious to know why the basenoter wants
to know. It reminds me of the general feeling about having children.
If we really knew what we were getting into would we do it?!!!!
Mary - who would do it again in a minute!
|
923.7 | capitol equipment :-) | CHIEFF::STOLICNY | | Sat May 25 1991 12:07 | 7 |
| Bare in mind, especially as far as infants are concerned, that noone has
made much mention of the "capitol expenditures" sometimes necessary.
You know, crib, mattress, carseat(s) (the requireds) and swings,
snuglis, walkers, swing set, sand box (the "extras"). These can
add up as well.
Carol
|
923.8 | so much is discretionary | CSSE32::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman, CSSE/DSS | Tue May 28 1991 10:37 | 42 |
| A lot of the cost of having a child or children is discretionary,
depending on your lifestyle and what's important to you.
You can hold the initial expenses way down if you need to. The
only real essential is a car seat, and you can usually rent that
from a local organization for less than the purchase price. I
know people who have made baby beds out of cardboard boxes with
mattresses of folded blankets wrapped in a sheet. You can use
blankets or pillows to make a safe space on a twin mattress, or
you can have the baby in bed with you until it's old enough for
its own bed. You can get by without a high chair by holding the
baby in your lap for feeding. You can get by without a potty seat
or a playpen or a swing.
All these things are nice, and they make it a lot easier for the
parents and a lot safer for the baby. I certainly wouldn't
recommend that anybody who can afford playpens and cribs and such
should do without them. But if you don't have the money, it's
possible to raise a baby well and safely without them.
For us, expenses actually drop when the child reaches the
post-diaper, post-baby-food age. They gradually climb as the
child is old enough for piano lessons (presently running around
$12 for a half-hour lesson), athletic activities, socializing, and
all the rest of it.
And if your child is really talented at something, the costs
skyrocket. Kat's ballet lessons run $400 for a 6- to 10-week
term, but that's lessons 5 days out of 7. Then there's shoes (toe
shoes, jazz shoes, character shoes, regular ballet slippers) and
leotards -- $400 a year, probably. Music lessons, art lessons,
sports equipment and programs, all run about the same amount for
someone who's seriously involved. There are often scholarships
and such available to defray costs for someone truly talented and
truly needy, but for the average among us, you'll have to decide
how much you're willing to sacrifice.
Not to mention the routine issues of whether you're going to buy
designer jeans and Reeboks, or whatever's trendy 14 years from
now.
--bonnie
|
923.9 | You give lovingly! | GOLF::TRIPPL | | Tue May 28 1991 10:44 | 14 |
| Not to belittle this, but raising kids seems to take every spare dime
you have, and you tend to give it to them lovingly! And if we waited
until we could "afford" kids, there wouldn't be ANY!
Over the weekend, even though we're facing some severe financial
difficulties, I still found the money to buy him a bottle of "bubbles",
the kind you blow. It was just so wonderful watching him have a good
time. We also found the time and money to go to Webster lake
yesterday, family time is so important.
Of course Murphy's Law says: sneaker wear out, and clothes get too small
when you can least afford them!
Lyn
|
923.10 | My reasons for asking | DPDMAI::NORTON | Jean Norton | Tue May 28 1991 11:21 | 19 |
| RE: .6
The reason I ask is two-fold. But I must admit it is based on a
'discussion' my husband and I had on the cost of raising children.
First, I'm curious because we want to have children and are trying to
save and budget should we be blessed. Second, we have a friend (male)
who is being sued for child support by an ex-girlfriend. The friend
feels betrayed because he believes the child is a result of
manipulation on the part of the ex. My husband feels the same way -
and can't seem to look beyond the betrayal and focus on the child.
Therefore, I'm curious about reasonable costs for child rearing to
satisfy my own curiousity. But also to point out to my husband that the
costs are real, and support money doesn't necessarily buy the mother a
new sportscar.
The main reason I didn't explain my motivations on the base note was
because I wanted rational, honest estimates, and I thought these
reasons may spur some emotional responses.
|
923.11 | Cost/benefit ratio doesn't compute, IMHO!! | ICS::NELSONK | | Tue May 28 1991 11:23 | 10 |
| I feel the same way...If you really, really understood how much
it costs to have kids, the human raece would have become extinct!
Besides, you can't put a dollar amount on a little one running
down the driveway to meet you at the end of the day...or "I wuv
you, Mummy" at bedtime...or "Dad, you're my best friend!"...or
the pride you feel when someone says, "He's a nice kid"...or
the nice clean way they smell after their bath....sorry to wax
sentimental, but some things haven't got a dollar value. My
$.02.
|
923.12 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Tue May 28 1991 11:36 | 20 |
|
My husband and I are having these very same financial discussions
and ours will be born in September! The point made previously is well
taken, if you wait until you are "financially set" then you will never
have a child.
Whenever we get very concerned (a polite word for crazy) about our
financial situation and whether or not we can actually afford this
baby, we just remind ourselves that lots can be improvised on, budgets
can be put in place, second-hand equipment works as well as new things,
and that environment, care and attention are low cast but high reward.
We're not out to give this child everything material, we're out to
take it on walks, to teach it how to play, to laugh and to have a good
time. This does not mean that we won't buy what we can, because we
certainly will strive to, however, on the days when both cars break
down or the tax man comes knocking at our door, we'll just have to work
with what we have.
Wendy
|
923.13 | Kids are expensive | BIRDY::SAUDELLI | | Fri May 31 1991 11:37 | 17 |
|
The costs to raise a child very greatly from one situation to another.
If you both work you can afford more materialistic items but usually
sacrifice the childs best interest(MOM or DAD being home with child).
My situation is I work during the day and go home to watch my two
girls(3 and 5) so my wife can work at night. The money is available
to support the expenses and the children are with a parent at all
times(no daycare expenses).
I'm not an advocate of Day care but it is needed in some situations(ie:
Single parents).
If people looked at the costs of daycare, I wonder if the expenses are
worth it vs staying home.
|
923.15 | calm down, everybody, stay cool | CSSE32::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman, CSSE/DSS | Fri May 31 1991 14:11 | 22 |
| Speaking as comod: Gently, please, everybody. . . this is a
sensitive issue.
Speaking for myself . . .
I will simply point out that there are many reasons other than
monetary gain for both parents working outside the home, and that
in general most families make decisions on what is best for the
entire family, both as a unit and as individuals. Generally there
will be some tradeoffs, so everyone has their needs and desires
considered and accommodated but no one person dominates all
decisions. It's a delicate balancing act to meet the best
interests of both parents and all the children all at the same
time. . .
To deal with a strictly monetary example, my staying home with our
youngest would mean that we couldn't afford to let our eldest
continue to study dance, even though she has potentially
professional-level ability. Which child's "best interest" counts
for more?
--bonnie
|
923.16 | Dual Income! -- is the last reason Juli's in daycare ... I can list 10 better reasons! | CALS::JENSEN | | Fri May 31 1991 15:08 | 44 |
|
Jim/I were able to flex-hour the "first" year. I am eternally grateful we
COULD and we DID ... however, it was not easy. For "us", I believe Juli
benefited most from the arrangement, as it sure did NOT ENHANCE any
"family time" (for ALL of US to be together), nor did it ENHANCE any
"private time" for Jim/I. We were not necessarily a FAMILY, but rather
we found ourselves being a "Mommy and baby" ... OR ... "Daddy and baby"!!!!
When Juli turned "1", a lot changed ... she was walking, active, independent
... and just plain becoming a "Little People" of her own ... and we ALL
THREE started to develop individual "needs", as well missing that
very much needed family time AND private time.
Homecare did NOT work out for Juli (as a child) ... nor us (as parents).
All three of us are very happy with our current daycare arrangement ...
not because our dual income allows us to have more "materialistic" things!
-- in fact, quite the contrary when you get done paying daycare expenses!
-- but it allows ALL THREE OF US to build our individualism, fulfull our
individual needs ... AND STILL be a family, too.
I have yet to figure out WHY so many tug-of-war's occur over this
daycare vs. homecare vs. NO daycare/homecare issue! I read an interesting
article in a Parenting magazine (I should have entered it here in
PARENTING!), but the bottom line was: most stay-at-home Mommies attack
working-Mommies, while very few working-Mommies attack stay-at-home
Mommies!!! In fact, working Mommies were usually extremely supportive
of stay-at-home Mommies -- not because they envied them, but because
they didn't feel THREATENED by them (they could be a stay-at-home
Mommie IF THEY WANTED TO!). Working-Mommies were generally very happy
with their choices and lifestyles, they didn't have to DEFEND THEM!
For the ka-zillionth time! -- each parent is different, each child is
different, each daycare is different ....!!!!! And if it works well
for you/your SO/your child ... then hip, hip, horray for EVERYONE!!!!!
Geeesssh!
Dottie
PS: Jim/I are both working professionals (DUAL INCOME), we do not live
in a gorgeous home, let me see if I can find $5 in my wallet! (I
would probably have $10 if I did NOT pay for daycare!) -- and we
both drive old jaloopies! So ... I guess "dual income" MUSTN'T be
the reason Juli's in daycare!
|
923.17 | So what am I working for?? | GOLF::TRIPPL | | Tue Jun 04 1991 17:45 | 20 |
| Let's see here, I came back to work full time when AJ was roughly 18
months old. I came back, as I keep saying, because our mortgage
company would like me to!
Now where does it go...
One third goes to TAXES
One Third goes to pay DAYCARE
One Third pays for gas for my car alone, clothes and shoes for AJ, some
clothes for me, lunch money for me at work, and a lot of food that can
be prepared quickly since I don't have a lot of time for a gourmet meal
after work.
So tell me again, What did I REALLY come back to work for???!!!
Oh yes, the privilege of talking to GROWNUPS..!!
Lyn
|
923.18 | Plan a little, don't worry, go for it!! | INFACT::HILGENBERG | | Tue Jun 11 1991 22:33 | 32 |
| My experience has been that I spend an amount proportional to our income.
Before Michelle was born and I was working full-time, I spent an
embarassingly large amount of money on her crib, room decorations, etc.
Only the best would do. Before we were spending thousands of dollars on
stereo equipment and cars, now I was spending it on her.
But then I was off for 6 months after her birth, all but 6 weeks of it unpaid.
I bought almost nothing! Of course I was also too busy to shop. Sometimes
during that period I would look at her crib and think of how I could have
better spent that money; I would justify it by thinking it would last 'til
the end of time!
Now I'm back to work half-time, and I buy things now and again. But
now I look at the second or third best, use coupons, or sometimes (egads!)
go without. I also never used to shop at Target; now I'm there at least
once a week!
As to planning ahead for financial security before having kids, I can
empathize. We saved a lot of money because I wanted the option of quitting
work for good if I wanted to, and being able to fall back on the savings
if needed. The trouble with that logic is you hate to think about spending
*any* of your savings, no matter what it's earmarked for. And it's pretty
hard to save up the amount of your yearly salary, multiplied by a few years
(or however long you're planning on staying home). Even though we lived
pretty cheap during that 6 months and we have no debts except our mortgage
(which is modest), we were amazed at how much money we *did* spend.
Looking back, I'm glad we had saved a tidy sum in preparation, but most
of the financial planning (sometimes worrying) was unnecessary. Just have
the kid(s)!!!!
Kyra
|