T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
725.1 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Ask Not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for ME! | Mon Feb 25 1991 15:12 | 23 |
| One thing that must be said, is that like the post-partum "growth
charts" and percentiles etc ... if some kids weren't bigger than
average and some kids weren't smaller than average, then we wouldn't
have the charts - and we wouldn't have a lot of worried parents!
Still, the most important thing to really be concerned about is that
you still are feeling movement and so on, indicating that the baby
is otherwise ok.
Were there ever small people in your families ? Such traits can
be a throw back from many generations ... they say as many as six
for colour traits for example. My wife and her mother are both
very small, and I am thin, so it is not at all surprising to find
our children are smaller than average. Even if you are of normal size
now, what were you like as a baby ? There are a million and one
variables ... that's why, apart from checking the obvious ones ..
like your own diet, there's not a lot the Dr will or can do at this
stage.
So, just make sure that you have a good diet ... and not just a big
diet, and I'm sure all will work out ok.
Stuart
|
725.2 | Relative growth important | NOVA::WASSERMAN | Deb Wasserman, DTN 264-1863 | Mon Feb 25 1991 15:33 | 4 |
| I think the important thing is not the absolute size of the baby, but
the fact that it is growing at a steady pace, and that you are gaining
weight at an acceptable rate. If the baby stops growing, that's a
problem.
|
725.3 | | SWSCIM::DIAZ | | Mon Feb 25 1991 16:08 | 13 |
| For my second ultrasound (I've forgotten how many weeks, sorry), the
doctor discovered something similar, in my case they said the head was
smaller than it should have been. I was scheduled for another
ultrasound a couple weeks later to check it out. It could have been an
indication that the placenta was malfunctioning because the growth was
out of proportion. After all the worry it turned out to be bad
measurements in the ultrasound.
So what I would concentrate on if I were you is that, the baby is in
proportion, the doctor is not talking about taking the baby early so
he is not worried about its growth currently just monitoring it. If the
doctor was worried, he have you in for frequent tests, etc. If he's not
worried, you shouldn't worry.
|
725.4 | | PIPLIN::CHANG | | Mon Feb 25 1991 16:22 | 18 |
| I know how you feel now. I had a similar problem with my second.
Throughout the preganacy, my OB thought she was about 4 weeks behind
in size. However, my period is very regular. It is impossible to
mess up the due date. I also had two ultrasounds, one at 22 week
and one at 30 week, both showed she was about 2 weeks behind. Since
both me and my husband are tall (I am 5'7", my husband is 6'1") and
our first is big too (he was 9lbs at birth), it is unlikely that I
will have a small baby. I was worried throught my preganacy.
Monica was only 3 days early and she was 7 lbs at birth. Later, my OB
told me that because I was carrying very low, and baby's position,
it was difficult for him and ultrasound to measure baby's size.
So, what I am trying to say is ... relax! Ultrasound isn't always
accurate. As long as baby is moving and growing, it will be fine.
Try to enjoy your final weeks of preganacy.
Wendy
|
725.5 | Tests are EASY to mess up! | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Mon Feb 25 1991 16:37 | 14 |
| I'll reiterate the possibility that the TEST is at fault here!!! When
we had amnios done for my first to determine how developed his lungs
were, the first amnio came back that he was ALMOST ok to deliver
(another couple days, he should've been fine). A week later, the amnio
was repeated, and the 2nd one came back that his lungs were severely
UNDERdeveloped (yes, worse than the first test!). Three days later he
was born, with VERY healthy, fully developed lungs.
Remember the technicians (and Drs) are just people too, and NO test is
foolproof! I wouldn't worry until you have a series of tests that
indicate the same condition .... and you do have a series of tests that
indicate the baby is ok!
|
725.6 | Don't Worry!!! | NEWPRT::WAGNER_BA | | Mon Feb 25 1991 17:50 | 14 |
| All of these replys are very good advice!
But just remember even if there were a growth problem, they are VERY
treatable! Our neighbor girl across the street was diagnosed with a
growth deficiency. She ran the gammit of tests, and found out she
didn't have a growth hormone deficiency (in which she would have to
take a shot in the arm for everyday until she was 14), but she has a
kidney problem, and the treatment is a little baking soda type drink 4
times a day. She is almost 2 years old by the way, and has the body of
a one year old. Both her parents are very short so they didn't suspect
anything for a while, until the doctor noticed she stopped gaining
weight.
We are so lucky these days to have the technology that we do!
|
725.7 | feeling a bit better! | DNEAST::CARMICHAEL_S | | Tue Feb 26 1991 07:43 | 30 |
| Wow! Thanks all of you for your replies. I feel a lot better
just getting ANY information that I can.
I am scheduled for another ultrasound this coming Monday in a
larger city with more sophisticated equipemnt just so my doctor can see
if there is something she didn't see. I'm hoping that the
measurements this time will be a little closer. After this it will be
ultrasounds every 2 weeks and, if the baby gets too far behind, I will
have to deliver early. Not looking forward to getting induced but all
I care about now is the baby.
The baby IS very low. His head is right down by my pelvic bone.
I am tall(5'10") but was thin (132lbs) when I started. I was
only 6lbs 1/2 oz when I was born and my mother had 2 preemies. The
biggest of the 5 of us didn't even hit 7lbs. My husband told me that he
was only a little over 6lbs himself at birth. I do eat right and I do
eat whenever I am hungry (and sometimes when I'm not!). I just don't
eat alot compared to many other people's standards. I have gained
around 20 pounds so far. I'm told there isn't anything wrong with
that. So, I've just been sort of leaning towards a small baby
especially where everything with the baby and I has been perfectily
fine up until now. Of course, I still worry!
Keep the replies coming. I really do appreciate them and I will
keep you posted.
-Sue
|
725.8 | UTLRASOUNDS CAN BE WRONG! | DEMON::MARRAMA | | Tue Feb 26 1991 09:45 | 18 |
|
I am 35 weeks pregnant and I had my first ultrasound when I was 17
weeks. The technician told me that I was 16 weeks, now I know when
I had my last period and when I ovulated so I just went by 17 weeks.
About 3 weeks ago I was put in the hospital for several abdominal pain,
they had me have another ultrasound. My doctor told me that it showed
the baby as being older that what I was. So you see, your baby can
grow tremendously in one month. Also, the last month it grows alot.
I have gained 18lbs this whole pregnancy and I think I am going to have
a 7lb or 8lb baby. Just as long as you are eating right and putting on
weight try not to worry!!!
Good luck and enjoy!!!
Kim
|
725.9 | Our story | APACHE::APACHE::FRIEDRICHS | Take the money and run! | Tue Feb 26 1991 10:50 | 38 |
| Our son was diagnosed with severe Intrauterine Growth Retardation
(IUGR) at 30 weeks gestation. Basically the placenta was not supporting
life appropriately. He was delivered early, at 30 weeks, and spent a
long time in the hospital. He was delivered by c-section, 75% of IUGR
are delivered by c-section. He is still no where near a growth chart,
but is developmentally normal. He has some typical "Preemie" problems
but is basically normal health wise. Problems are high risk for
respiratory disease.
Go for all the tests possible. They did ultrasounds twice a week, and
an amniocentisis to check for lung development. Most IUGR have good
lungs, because the baby is under stress in utero. Don't rush into
anything, get all the info possible, and ask every question you can
think of concerning anything. Most of all, get to the best hospital
possible for obstetrics and Neonatal care. Also speak to a
neonatologist if they discuss delivering the child early to prepare
yourself for possible problems.
Basically, everything turned out fine for us, but it is a long road.
I know I have inflicted alot of fear into your life, but these problems
do occur. After all this I will say try not to worry, there is
absolutely nothing you can do to stop it, nor did you do anything to
cause it. After 21 months, we still have no reason why it happened, it
just happens.
Remember, don't rush into anything, get all the information possible,
and if you want, take a day to make the decision. Also, pay attention
to the ultrasound, I went to an Ultrasound Specialist, and the
technician did a first ultrasound and then the doctor came in and did
another. Make them explain everything, that is what they are there
for. The course of my pregnancy was based on the ultrasound.
Feel free to send me mail. ALso my wife is at home and will be willing
to talk to you. Support is very important.
I pray nothing is wrong. Good luck. Let us know what happens, when
you feel like it.
|
725.10 | | RTL::ROLLMAN | | Tue Feb 26 1991 12:33 | 22 |
|
I think the "carrying low" is a big factor in an accurate measurement. I also
carried low and had weekly ultrasounds. They had trouble getting accurate
measurements every week because they couldn't get a clear picture of her head.
However, she continued to gain every week, even though I didn't.
Also she weighed 6lbs, 4ozs at birth (one week early), even though I'm 5'7"
and my husband is 6'2". I think I read somewhere that baby weight at birth is
related to the mother's birth size, given an adequate diet.
In addition, I had an ultrasound at Brigham and Women's in Boston and
they were wrong on their estimate of gestation. Even the most respected
make mistakes.
So, hang in there and don't worry. (yea, yea, do as I say, not as I did).
BTW, if you're going to have a series of ultrasounds, don't hesitate to ask
the technician for ultrasound pictures. We have a really weird picture of our
daughter's face when she was a 35 week fetus. She is looking straight at the
camera with her eyes open. When she was born we were amazed, she looked just
like her picture.
|
725.11 | My Experience | APACHE::MAZZUCOTELLI | | Tue Feb 26 1991 13:03 | 39 |
| My doctor told me the same thing when I was about 35 weeks and that's
when my doctor ordered my first ultrasound. I too was positive of when I
conceived so I knew the due date was accurate.
What causes them to
suspect that there is IUGR is the percentage of growth from an early
ultrasound (done around 12 weeks). But, like many people have stated
before, due to many variables (machine, technician, etc) the ultrasound
may not be the most accurate. Later ultrasounds done by themselves, as
in my case, do not give an accurate rendering of possible IUGR because
early fetal growth is about the same, but later growth is probably more
hereditary -- that's how you get a 18 incher or a 20+ incher.
If the baby does have IUGR and goes full term, the baby's head will
look even more out of proportion to its body than "normal" babies.
There may be other affects but I'm not an expert.
What my doctor did was order the ultrasounds and non-stress tests to
see if the fetus was under any stress and to see if the placenta was
functioning properly (right amount of fluid). If the womb looks like
it is not supporting the baby properly, then they would get the baby
out early.
All my tests came back fine (no distress, plenty of fluid) but my
doctor decided to induce one week early. I was disappointed when he
told me that but at that same office visit he stretched my cervix
(OUCH!). In some women this sends them into labor right away, with me
it took a couple days (even though the labor pains started the next
day). I ended up delivering the day before I was scheduled to be
induced! The result, a healthy, perfectly proportioned, little girl!
She was 5 lb 7oz and 18 inches. On the small size but perfectly
healthy. I look back at pictures and can't believe that she was that
small, but she's now 7 months old and in the 50th percentile for weight
and about the 25th percentile for height.
Bottom line, there is some reason to be concerned, but follow your
doctor's advice and enjoy your last few weeks!
Jane
|
725.12 | small uterus ? | POWDML::LALIBERTE | | Tue Feb 26 1991 13:06 | 17 |
| We had the same IUGR diagnosis with my son (he's now 3)...i was
having weekly ultrasounds towards the end and they found he was
not gaining any weight over the last 3 weeks before delivery.
During these tests I also had a test where they check the placenta
and since that placenta was a-ok, they did not consider the growth
issue to be a real problem....even to the point that "I" was the
one who noticed the numbers and had to mention it to the doctor !
I had gained about 52 pounds and thought i was having a big baby
but he was only 5 1/2 pounds. he was very skinny when he was born
and still to this day he is small but my father-in-law is small
so it could all be genetics.
However, I do have an extra small uterus because of DES complications
so this is what the doctors said may have caused the IUGR. But I
could tell they were not really sure.
|
725.13 | Accuracy (?) of ultrasounds... | CRONIC::ORTH | | Tue Feb 26 1991 13:28 | 16 |
| With our last child, my wife became gestationally diabetic near the
end, and they did wekkly ultrasounds, as there is a greater possibility
of a large baby. At 38 weeks, she was measuring 43 weeks, and they were
convincd that the baby was *at least* 10-11 lbs. They induced a week
early, and he weighed in at 8 lbs. 15 oz.! So much for accuracy!
With this pregnancy, she has only had two ultrsounds so far. One showed
right on target, and the other they wouldn't even measure the
baby....the baby was breech (head up), and they said that measurements
then are very inaccurate, either too high or too low. They also said
very low babies (those that are head down, at least), make accurate
measurements nearly impossible. If either of these was the case with
you, then take the measurements with a grain of salt. Ask your doctor
if this could have been the case for you.
--dave--
|
725.14 | Small doesn't always mean bad news | ELMAGO::PHUNTLEY | | Tue Feb 26 1991 14:21 | 23 |
| I had a similar experience. However, my doctor's biggest concern
was my lack of weight gain. I only gained 13 pounds my entire
pregnancy and ended up weighing less after the delivery than I did
before pregnancy. My original due date was the beginning of May
and this changed continually throughout my pregnancy. Joshua was
finally born June 19th, 1989. I had thought my menstrual cycle
was very regular but I guess it wasn't--the dating was way off in
regards to my actual delivery date. I had numerous ultrasounds,
bloodtests, GTTs, etc. and all determined that the baby was small
for gestational age, etc. However, Joshua was a average 6 lbs.
15ozs. at birth and extremely healthy (APGARS of 7 and 9) at birth.
He is now very large for his age--wears size 3 toddler at 20 months.
He still is slim (25lbs) but quite tall. My doctor did put me on
leave early from work--went on leave in March since I had only gained
4 pounds at 6 months of pregnancy and she considered me to be "high"
risk. FWIW, all was well despite all my worrying and fear of the
worst.
Feel free to send me mail @ ELMAGO::Phuntley.
Regards,
Pam
|
725.15 | My story | IOSG::RUMBELOWJ | | Wed Feb 27 1991 03:39 | 53 |
| I was diagnosed as having Inter-Uterine Growth Retardation when I was
34 weeks pregnant. I can really sympathise with what you're going
through, I know what it's like and how worrying it is.
In my case, my doctor thought that the baby felt small at a routine
34 week check and sent me to the hospital to have a scan. The doctor
at the hospital though that the baby was about four weeks behind and
immediately attmitted me into hospital. They did stress tests which
showed that the baby was fine, so they decided to keep me in bed (in
hospital) for two weeks to see if that helped the growth rate. I
felt perfectly well and healthy but had to stay in hospital for two
weeks - it felt very strange! After two weeks I had another scan
which showed that the growth rate had picked up a bit, but the baby
was still small. So I was sent home with strict instructions not to
do ANYTHING. It was very frustrating - I didn't have anything ready
for the baby and had planned on doing all my shopping, sorting out
the nursery, cooking meals for the freezer etc etc in the last six
weeks. But, really what's most important is to do what's best for
the baby.
I had weekly check-ups at the hospital and another scan at 38 weeks.
This scan showed that the growth rate was slowing down again and they
estimated the baby's weight at 4.5lb. So they decided to induce me.
My doctor doesn't like doing c-sections unless absolutely necessaary,
and I wanted to avoid a c-section, so he went for induction. He
wasn't sure if it would work because I wasn't ready to give birth,
but in fact it did work. Alison was born 9.5 hours after the start
of the induction, and I was only in serious pain for about half a
dozen contractions. Alison weighed 5lb and was very healthy, but
very skinny. The midwife said that my placenta was unhealthy and had
probably to fail, but foolishly I didn't think to ask for any more
details at the time.
My daughter spent the first month of her life just sleeping and
eating, and I felt for a long time that she was about a month behind
developmentally (although my doctor didn't agree - she thought she
was fine!). Alison is now 21 months old and I don't think she's
behind any more. She's still small, but not abnormally so (I'm
5'1" and my husband is 5'7" so I don't expect her to be very big).
When I asked "Why is this happening to me?" the doctors didn't know
for sure, but they said that smoking, maternal age and stress can
have an effect (I don't smoke, I'm in my early thirties - not sure if
that's old!, but I was quite stressed at work). The only thing they
could suggest to help was to get as much rest as possible.
Do try not to worry, try to rest as much as you can, and remind
yourself that most small for dates babies are just that - small for
dates, and there is nothing else wrong with them.
Good luck
- Janet
|
725.16 | Everything turned out fine | DNEAST::CARMICHAEL_S | | Fri May 24 1991 13:58 | 39 |
| Well, just thought I would update you all on what finally happened with
all of this. I ended up having stress test on a weekly basis and ultra
sounds every two weeks. On the second ultrasound at 34 1/2 weeks the
doctor confirmed that my baby was indeed falling further behind. At
this point the lower torso was about 6 weeks behind. That's scary.
So, they ordered amniocentesis to check lung maturity. I was petrified
cause I hate needles but it really wasn't that bad. The test that they
do usually only takes a day and they were supposed to call me that
evening. Well, someone in the lab screwed up and didn't get the test
going until late that afternoon. The next day I got a call saying that
indeed my babies lungs were mature and how about induction the next
day. This was at 6pm and they wanted me to come in the next morning
around 6am!!!!! How's that for short notice?!!! I was scared to
death. I was admitted the next day and they gave me prostoglandin gel
to begin with as I was only 1cm and 50% effaced. I got two doses of
that and it didn't do anything so they started the pitocin early
afternoon. Never got far that day and they stopped at 6:30pm. Started
up the next morning bright and early by breaking my water and cranking
up the ole pitocin. By 6pm I was only 3cm and 100%effaced and couldn't
take it any longer so I got an epidural. The whole time the baby did
fine until about an hour after that when his heart rate dropped way
down. Doctor's and nurses came running from everywhere. I was pretty
much out of it by then so I didn't realize that something was wrong but
my husband did. Anyway, they checked me and I had dilated to 10 cm in
about an hour. Couldn't believe it. Good thing too because, had I not
been ready to deliver then, I would've had a c-section. I was wheeled
down to a special room used for high risk deliveries and at 8:49pm on
March 22nd, 5 weeks before he was due, Roderic Lowell Carmichael was
born a whopping 3lbs 2oz. He was rushed to intensive care where he
stayed for 2 weeks and then was transfered to a hospital closer to home
where he stayed for two weeks. It was 2 weeks before he had enough
strength to eat from a bottle. Today he is 9 weeks old and finally
around 6 pounds. He is perfectily healthy. They blame it on a fibrous
placenta and had he gone to term he probably would've been a still
birth. I am so glad that everything turned out ok and I am enjoying to
the FULLEST having him here with us.
Sue.
|
725.17 | great news | TIPTOE::STOLICNY | | Fri May 24 1991 14:16 | 9 |
|
Sue,
Congratulations! and welcome Roderic!
3lbs 2oz...the technology that helps these small babies survive
is amazing and precious!
Carol
|