T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
601.1 | | RANGER::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Mon Jan 07 1991 13:23 | 9 |
| No answers, just a suggestion - you should probably contact the
state and the insurance people directly, and probably in writing if
you have time for that. That way you get an "official" answer in
writing - it could be important to have it in writing if there are
complications later. And you may want to retain the services of a
qualified tax consultant, at least to answer your questions.
- Tom
|
601.2 | Check with Local authorities | KAOFS::M_FETT | Schreib Doch Mal! | Mon Jan 07 1991 13:37 | 5 |
| I agree with .-1;
I'm not sure about differences between states, but
the laws vary quite a lot between provinces in Canada.
Monica
|
601.3 | It's definately different in the different states. | RAVEN1::HEFFELFINGER | Vini, vidi, visa | Mon Jan 07 1991 13:45 | 9 |
| In S.C., apparently all you have to do to claim someone is your wife is
to claim that they are your wife. :-)
I friend of mine claimed his live-in girlfriend and her children on his
taxes long before they were married.
Tracey
|
601.4 | Hope this helps..... | ISLNDS::BARR_L | Snow - Yech! | Mon Jan 07 1991 13:47 | 14 |
| Hi,
I'm an unwed mother who also lives with my babies father. My baby
has my boyfriend's last name (we found out before he was born that
this was perfectly legal and that I could have given him any last
name I wanted to, i.e. Smith, Jones or Kennedy for that matter). I
changed my tax filing status to single/2 after he was born and I will
be the one to claim him on my taxes. It's true that only one of you
can claim the baby due to the fact that you are unmarried and that you
both file separate tax forms, but it doesn't make a difference which
one of you does. And your insurance and taxes are completely separate,
so it doesn't matter if you insure the child or your boyfriend does.
Lori B.
|
601.5 | | USOPS::GALLANT | desperado... | Mon Jan 07 1991 13:48 | 14 |
|
RE: .3
That's probably a "common law" marriage, which would be the
case here if we'd been together for 7 (?) years. We've
only been together for four...
RE: .1 and .2
I'll take that into consideration and will probably go down
that path. I was just hoping someone might have had experience
with it already..
/Kim
|
601.6 | varies a lot from state to state | TLE::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Jan 08 1991 09:39 | 4 |
| It does vary extensively from state to state. Check with a
lawyer or legal aid organization.
--bonnie
|
601.7 | | RADIA::PERLMAN | | Tue Jan 08 1991 23:08 | 35 |
|
Well, ELF says you're from Massachusetts. We checked with a lawyer
before deciding there would be no problems in Massachusetts having
joint children without being married. The rules are:
1) you can give your children any name you want. As the birth clerk
said, I was free to name my daughter Richard M Nixon if that's what
I wanted.
We chose a new last name by sort of merging part of each of our
last names. Mine's Perlman. His is Speciner. Kids are Perlner.
(We didn't choose the other possibility...). Married people can
also choose any last name -- merged, his, hers, a totally new one,
hyphenated, etc.
2) You should fill out a "paternity statement", which they have
at the hospital. It's a simple form that has to be signed by both
of you acknowledging him as the father. I've forgotten whether you
need to do that in order to have his name on the birth certificate
as the father. Oddly enough, if you are married and want to put
someone other than your husband as the father on the birth certificate,
the paternity statement has to be signed by you, the person you're
claiming is the father, AND you husband.
3) You should put his name on the birth certificate.
4) You ought to do wills, but that's true if you're married also.
5) Once his name is on the birth certificate, and you have the
paternity statement, he has full rights and responsibilities. His
"family plan" medical insurance insures the kids (but not the mother).
You could sue him for child support, or for custody. Both of you
have the same parental rights/responsibilities as if you'd been
married.
6) All the dire stories people might say about how kids will be
outcasts, or made fun of, haven't occurred to us. Our kids are made
fun of sometimes, but not for having their parents not be married.
A large proportion of kids have remarried parents, or divorced parents.
Kids living with both their biological parents can't possibly raise
any eyebrows.
7) There is no common law marriage in Massachusetts.
|
601.8 | | USOPS::GALLANT | desperado... | Thu Jan 10 1991 09:49 | 11 |
|
RE: .7
Thanks for the all the vital information! Yes, we do live
in MA (regrettably).
I hope you don't mind if I print this out as a "checklist"..
/Kim
|
601.9 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | A red haired baby woman | Mon Jan 14 1991 15:59 | 11 |
| /Kim
My son's daughter was born in Conn and there was no problem there
with his name going on her birth certificate.
I checked some months back with a friend who has two children and
who was not married to the kids father (tho they lived together)
to find out what kinds of problems Michael and Holly might face
and she told me that she had no problems at all in Mass.
Bonnie
|
601.10 | | USOPS::GALLANT | Candyman is on the prowl... | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:01 | 11 |
|
RE: Bonnie
Thanks... Lori Barr was kind enough to send me some mail
on her situation (since she lives in MA, too) and it
helped a great deal.
I'm 99.9% positive we'll be going with his last name
anyway but I wanted to check other situations as well.
/Kim
|