T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
580.1 | | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Fri Dec 21 1990 13:12 | 11 |
|
How old is Rayna, and what is her current care arrangement? One hopes
that she enjoys it, and might miss activities and friends if taken out,
quite apart from the strain that two kids home might put on her mom.
Aaron was 4 when Eric arrived, and stayed in full time care, though his
mom took a 3 month leave. I think it was good for him that this part
of his life was scarcely disrupted or changed at all by the new
arrival.
- Bruce
|
580.2 | I opted for daycare | DSSDEV::STEGNER | | Fri Dec 21 1990 13:43 | 0 |
580.3 | part-time vote | 57462::WARREN | | Fri Dec 21 1990 13:52 | 24 |
| Caileigh turned two the day before Paige was born. I continued to send
her to daycare two or three days a week when I was home on STD. The
benefits were several:
1) It decreased the number of upheavals in her life since she was
used to attending. The place, teachers and friends were all
"hers," not something else she had to share with that new baby.
2) It gave me time alone with Paige that I felt she (and I) deserved,
and which was difficult at first with (a jealous) Caileigh home.
3) It kept her slot open at daycare; it also eliminated the
possibility of adjustment problems when the time came to start
again.
4) It made it easier for me to really focus time and attention on
Caileigh when she was home.
5) It gave me a little more rest time, which I sorely needed after a
very difficult delivery.
-Tracy
|
580.4 | Part-Time | HYSTER::DELISLE | | Fri Dec 21 1990 14:52 | 9 |
| My vote is go for the part-time is that an option. I sent my brood
three days a week when number 4 was born and it was extremely helpful.
If you can swing it financially do it. I had little to no jealousy to
deal with in my kids however. They welcomed the new baby with open
arms, and a great deal of curiousity. They enjoyed their daycare, it
was during the summer and they played outside there almost all day,
something they couldn't do at home when mom had to tkae care of the
baby. Plus it gave me a chance to rest, which I sorely needed.
|
580.5 | my experience | TPS::SCHLAM | Joseph Schlam | Fri Dec 21 1990 15:36 | 26 |
|
one dad's experience...
Alexandra was 3 years 2 months when Mark was born. We changed her
schedule from full time to 4 days per week for a few months, and then
returned to full time day care. Stacey went back to work when Mark
was 3 months and I was home 3 days/week for 15 months.
Alexandra enjoyed being home and playing with her brother, but missed
her friends at day care, and had the vocabulary to tell us that she
did not like sharing her time with her brother. Caring for an infant
takes enough time from a 3 year old who is used to undivided attention
that she will show in whatever way she is able that she is not happy with
the new situation. So, back to school and a happier existence.
I did, however, let her "skip" daycare for no reason whatsoever if she
felt like staying home. I tryed to schedule my days so that she had a
special time during one of Mark's naps when this happened.
She didn't ask for a day home every other day, but (if my memory serves
correctly) maybe once a month, so I found that to be a good
arrangement.
Joe
|
580.6 | Daycare | CSC32::WILCOX | Back in the High Life, Again | Fri Dec 21 1990 15:43 | 10 |
| Without question we're keeping Kathryne in daycare, but probably
cutting back on her hours a little. Mainly for the same reasons
already mentioned, i.e., I don't want to disrupt her routine and
her friendships, I'll need a break, etc. I'm on leave now, waiting
for #2 and have been sending her. In general, I've been taking her
over a little later in the day, maybe after watching a video or
going to breakfast at McDonalds. Also been picking her up a little
earlier.
Liz
|
580.7 | | TSGDEV::CHANG | | Wed Dec 26 1990 10:33 | 10 |
| We Kept Eric in daycare full-time while I was on STD.
Same as what Liz did, I took him over a little later in
the day and picked him up a little earlier in the afternoon.
It worked out great. I got plenty of rest and really enjoy
spending time with the baby. For Eric, I also think it was
a good arrangement. Otherwise, he would be bored. Therefore,
If money is not an issue, I vote for full-time daycare.
BTW, Eric was 26 month old when Monica was born.
Wendy
|
580.8 | no change | TLE::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Wed Dec 26 1990 10:34 | 5 |
| We left Steven, 5, in his regular daycare and regular hours when
David was born -- we tried to change his routine as little as
possible as a result of the baby.
--bonnie
|
580.9 | My .02... | CRONIC::ORTH | | Wed Dec 26 1990 12:28 | 13 |
| Never having used a daycare at all, as my wife has been home full-time
with all of our children since day 1, I may seem unqualified to answer
this. My comment is (and I hope its helpful) that if you are not used
to being the full-time, 7 days a week caregiver for your 3.5 yr. old,
*don't start when you have a newborn in the house*! Caring for a
pre-schooler alone, full-time, is hard enough, and since you'll also
have the baby, it would not be a good time to have your son home all
the time. Maybe try the in later, out earlier, that others have
suggested, or skip one day a week, or something, but if I were you (and
my wife would wholeheartedly agree), don't jump into full-time
caregiving for both, right after the baby's birth!
--dave--
|
580.10 | Another intention of part-time | CARTUN::MANDALINCI | | Wed Dec 26 1990 12:44 | 23 |
| I'm in the same situation (due in 3+ weeks) and intend to keep our son
in daycare 3 days a week. I don't want him disrupted much more (see a
previous note about evaluating daycare) but I'm being realistic about
what I will be able to accomplish with 2 kids at home. I don't think
there is anyway I could do a good job keeping my son entertained the
way he wants and needs to be and recover myself at the same time. I did
tell my son's daycare that I need flexibility at this point and they
said no problem at all.
Once the baby is born, I have no intention of waking up a sleeping baby
to get my son to daycare at a specific time but will work that within
the schedule of the daycare center (learning activites start at 10:00 so
he'll be there by then). I too assume it will be a later drop off and
pick up time.
I think part-time is important for 2 reasons; first it gives you time
alone with the newborn (like you had with the first) and secondly, it
gives you relaxed time with both children (our weekends seem to be
so hectic).
Best of luck for a short delivery!!!
ANdrea
|
580.11 | PT is a good compromise! | SALEM::SILVERIA | | Thu Dec 27 1990 13:34 | 11 |
| Ditto on the majority of replies here. Paige continued in Day Care
part-time when Jake was born and I was on STD.
It worked out especially well for us as Jake developed acute jaundice
and had to go for daily morning blood tests to the hospital for a week
and a half after he was born. It would have been much more difficult
to do with my 3� year old along as well.
Best wishes to you!
-ali
|
580.12 | Your replies have helped! | DEMON::DEMON::BROWN | Lesley Brown | Wed Jan 02 1991 16:16 | 6 |
| Thanks for all of the replies -- I'm going to resist the
temptation to be "super-mom", and keep Rayna in daycare
part-time (with shortened hours). My daycare is willing,
and I'll feel Rayna's getting the best of both situations
(she loves daycare, but she's excited about having a
little brother or sister).
|