T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
542.1 | | TSGDEV::CHANG | | Tue Dec 04 1990 15:51 | 16 |
| I have two kids. With my first, during the whole preganacy,
I was told by my friends, OB/GYN nurses, strangers, etc.. that
it is a boy. Therefore, I was mentally prepared that it will be a boy.
It did turn out to be a boy. I don't think it spoiled the
'surprise'. I was still curious of what he will look like.
With my second, I had two ultrasounds, one said it is a girl,
one said it is a boy. Therefore, I had 9 months of guessing.
I hated it. I wished I can know for sure. It turned out to be
a girl.
I personally like to know the sex ahead of the time so that I
can be better prepared. And I don't think it will spoil the
fun.
Wendy
|
542.2 | YEAH!!! IT'S A BOY!!! | CYPRES::HERRERA_LI | | Tue Dec 04 1990 15:53 | 18 |
| Brenda,
We found out "for sure" at 28 weeks.....I wanted to know SO bad!
And so did my husband!! We were so curious! We didn't have a
preference of boy or girl, we just wanted to get to know our baby
a little better! I was so excited when we found out Alexander was
a boy...my heart was pounding! So, I guess I just got my surprise
early.
To be honest, know "he" was coming soon helped me get through a
terrible pregnancy. If we have another child, I am sure we will
want to find out again.
Babies are wonderful!!!
Linette
(Alex is 4 months old today!!)
|
542.3 | I would have liked to have known. | EXPRES::GILMAN | | Tue Dec 04 1990 16:05 | 11 |
| We have one kid, a boy. My wife did not want to know ahead of time
and as the 'owner' of the pregnancy prevailed. I did want to know
ahead of time but was not able to. Knowing ahead of time would
have reduce the stress of adapting to being a first time parent
for me because it would have allowed me to adjust to the sex of
the child a bit ahead of time. "It doesn't make any difference".
Yes, it does, for me anyway.
Jeff
|
542.4 | I'm glad I knew in advance..... | ISLNDS::BARR_L | Have a Holly Jolly X-Mas | Tue Dec 04 1990 16:23 | 23 |
| In the beginning of my pregnancy I did not want to know the sex
of my baby. I had wanted a girl so bad and just had it in my mind
that that was what I was going to have. Towards the end of my
pregnancy I had ultrasounds twice a week (due to the fact that I
was gestationally diabetic). One time the ultrasound technician
had asked me if I knew what the sex of the baby was and I said I
didn't. She asked me what I wanted and I told her that I wanted
a girl. She immediately shut up. The next time I went for ultrasound
I said, "It's a boy, isn't it?". The technician asked, "Didn't you
find out at your last ultrasound?". I said, "No". She asked if
I really wanted to know. I told her that I did and she confirmed
that it was a boy.
I'm glad that I found out in advance because I had wanted a girl
so bad that if I had waited until my son was born to find out that
I had a boy, I may have rejected him. I was able to get over the
depression of knowing I was having a boy before he was born and
it also helped me to get over a lot of the anxiety I was feeling.
Don't get me wrong, I love my son so much and I wouldn't trade him
for all the baby girls in the world.
Lori B.
|
542.5 | | CSC32::WILCOX | Back in the High Life, Again | Tue Dec 04 1990 21:47 | 10 |
| I knew that my second pregnancy (which I lost) was a boy. I wanted to
know because I tend towards the ultra-practical side and wanted to
make sure I hit the right sale racks at the stores!
I don't know what I'm carrying now, but with being due three weeks
from today I'll know soooooon.
Lori, I completely understand what you're saying. I desparately hope
this child is a boy, will LOVE whatever it is, but believe I'll have
to grieve a bit if it's a girl.
|
542.6 | Wanted to Know!!! | UCOUNT::STRASENBURGH | | Wed Dec 05 1990 08:01 | 21 |
| Lori,
With my first I wanted to know. I am a very organized person and I
wanted to have the room ready. I did not want to go with a color for
either.( Blue for a boy Pink for a girl). I found out through a
ultrasound at 26 weeks that I was having a boy.
I was thrilled abouting having a boy, my husband was a little sad he
wanted a girl. When the Big day arrived the whole experience was very
exciting and knowing the sex did not make it less exciting.
I am now expecting my second and I want to know the sex again. This
time to determine whether all the clothes I am saving from my son will
be used or not used.
Next week I go in for amnio (That is 100%) so I should know the sex in
3 to 4 weeks. (Can't Wait).
Good Luck,
Lynne
|
542.7 | Suprise me !! | USEM::SENA | | Wed Dec 05 1990 08:49 | 10 |
| I definately didn't want to know what sex our baby was, but I just
felt like it was a girl, especially after I had read a note in the
this notesfile about the heartbeat rate/sex. My husband really
wanted to know so that he could paint the room the "right" color, but
he got over it. Even towards the end when I had a few ultrasounds, I
didn't want to know for sure - I had gone the full 9 months without
knowing, so why spoil the suprise now ?
-Joy
|
542.8 | didn't matter to us | TLE::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Wed Dec 05 1990 09:37 | 9 |
| I didn't care about knowing because there wasn't anything I was
going to change based on the information. I don't care for either
extremely feminine or minimacho clothing, we chose an attractive
color that would last for years even if the kids decided to change
rooms or we decided to sell the house, and we were generally going
to reuse the stuff we had on hand no matter what the sex of the
next one was. So there wasn't any point to knowing.
--bonnie
|
542.9 | It's a puppy! | CHCLAT::HAGEN | Please send truffles! | Wed Dec 05 1990 09:58 | 14 |
| Why is it NOT a surprise to find out the sex ahead of time? I guess I really
don't see much difference in being told "It's a girl/boy!!!" X weeks before
you deliver, or being told the exact same thing on delivery day. Either way,
you are finding out something you didn't know previously!
I wish I had the option of finding out ahead of time. I would definitely like
to know. I am due in April with my 2nd. Let me tell you, by the time I went
thru labor and delivery with the first (and I had an EASY, quick, labor and
delivery) I didn't really care WHAT I gave birth to. They could've said "It's
a puppy!" and I wouldn't have felt surprised/excited. I was just relieved it
was over! I would have preferred to hear the joyous news "It's a boy!" when
I wasn't so exhausted. It would've been more exciting/surprising, I think.
� �ori �
|
542.10 | We new and it did not change the feeling of excitement | STAR::GRIFFIN | | Wed Dec 05 1990 11:16 | 40 |
|
My wife and I did not really care one way or the other what the sex
of our children were when she was carrying them. For the first two
pregnancies we did not know until they were born, they were both boys.
However, for the third child my wife needed to have ultrasounds done
because she had placenta-previa and was spotting.
The technician asked my wife if she wanted to know the sex of the
baby. My wife got nervous because all she really wanted was a healthy
baby but in her heart she was wishing for a girl. Well we decided that
we wanted to know the sex, the technician said it was a girl. My wife
was ecstatic. To me I think it was more pleasurable knowing the sex
ahead of time in this case because you might say we got what we wanted.
I even wrote an announcement for the delivery, I will include it here.
**** FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ****
We are pleased to announce the release of Nicole Griffin. The third
in a family of compatible, user friendly person products.
Under development for the past 38.25 weeks under the internal code
name of B.A.B.Y., co developers Brenda and Keith Griffin announced that
Nicole was delivered 12 days ahead of schedule at 04:20pm on August 22,1988.
Nicole, sporting a total new design from the previous two releases
(Derick and Mark), arrived in an innovative, self contained, pale pink,
washable, soft-bound wrapper weighing in initially at 8 pounds 9� ounces
and measuring 19� inches in length. This new design includes several high
tech devices such as a hydrodynamic input - output system with auditory
feedback sensory alarms, built in alarm clock for re-training parents to the
rigors of the ingestion schedule, and an intuitive ability to manipulate
the environmental controls to produce any and all desired results.
At the initial release, functionality consists primarily of
processing parent-prepared liquid input streams. The automatic auditory
alarm is triggered whenever output is available in the parent installed
filtration devices.
|
542.11 | is there a timeframe on surprise? | YIELD::BROOKE | | Wed Dec 05 1990 12:50 | 19 |
| I really only have one question: Why would finding out in an ultrasound
not be a surprise? With my first I didn't know because we didn't want
any ultrasounds. I was convinced that I was having a girl, and my
husband wanted a girl soooo bad, that when we were picking names he
didn't care what I chose for a boy, but DID WE ARGUE over the girl's
name! It was a BOY!!!!!
For the second and third I did want to know. It was just as much a
surprise knowing at 6.5 months as it was at delivery. But better
because we named him right then. Justin (our first) appeared to accept
the second child more easily because he was more "real" to him once he
had a name. (Justin was very excited anyway...kept a stuffed animal
under his shirt all day once because he was having a baby like Mommy!)
By the way, even if you know ahead of time, you may be surprised....
ultrasounds are only 60% right with girls, and 90% on boys....they only
look for what is there...or not there....maybe it's hidden!
-Laura
|
542.12 | They sure can be wrong! | CRONIC::ORTH | | Wed Dec 05 1990 14:41 | 13 |
| To add to Laura's last paragraph in reply .11-----
We have firends who had three boys and when pregnant with the fourth,
wanted very much for it to be a girl. Well, due to some pregnancy
complications, she had *many* ultrasounds, all of which indicated a
girl. They were elated! and immediately bought all sorts of frilly pink
stuff. two days before she delivered, the final ultrasound was done.
She said the doctor was very quiet doing it. She was getting worried,
until he said, "Uh, I'm not sure how to tell you this, but.....you've
got a boy in there....He is perfectly positioned and there is *NO*
mistaking it!!". Well, boy it was. She said he sure lookid funny in all
of theat frilly pink clothing..............
--dave--
|
542.13 | Is It Pink???? Or Blue???? | MR4DEC::POLAKOFF | | Wed Dec 05 1990 15:15 | 39 |
|
Brenda,
I did a *very* wierd thing when I was pregnant with Hannah--but I don't
regret it for a minute. As a matter of fact, it makes for very
entertaining conversation.
I wanted to know the baby's sex, and my husband didn't. We both were
pretty adament as to our feelings. So--when the amneo results came in,
I asked my doctor to tell me the sex--but not to tell anyone else (ie:
my husband). My doctor complied--and for most of my pregnancy, I was
the ONLY one who knew that Hannah was indeed a Hannah, and not a
Nicholas!
I did finally break down about 2 weeks before my due date and tell a
clerk in a baby store--but that was it. I didn't even tell my mother
or my best friend. As a matter of fact, most people were convinced it
was a boy (I may have thrown subtle hints in that direction...), but
only I knew for sure.
I am really glad I knew because I needed to know. I was very
ambivalent about being pregnant and knowing helped me to bond to the
baby before she was born.
With my second pregnancy, both me and my husband want to know. I want
to know for the same reasons I wanted to know the 1st time--I feel it
helps with bonding and my husband wants to know because he feels he had
his big surprise with Hannah and he wants to know for bonding as well.
So, we both know!
I recommend knowing. If you're not into the big surprise, then why not
know? Those of us who are control freaks feel that if the technology
is there....use it! It would drive me crazy to know I could know...but
not know. Get that?
Let us know what you decide to do.
Bonnie
|
542.14 | I'd recommend saving the "surprise" | MINAR::BISHOP | | Wed Dec 05 1990 15:52 | 9 |
| My wife thought she didn't care, and I was mildly curious, so
we asked to be told--the resulting feeling was such that if we
ever have another, we'll ask not to be told.
It's something like not having rice at a wedding, or not having
a pumpkin at Halloween: you don't really mind, but you know you're
missing part of the traditional experience.
-John Bishop
|
542.15 | | BUFFER::WARREN | | Wed Dec 05 1990 16:35 | 8 |
| The first time I did NOT want to know (and didn't). The second time, I
wouldn't have minded knowing, but although I had numerous ultrasounds,
she (the baby) didn't give us any previews.
So Bonnie P., are you going to tell anyone this time (like US?!!)?
T.
|
542.16 | I've made my decision... | BPOV02::MANDERFIELD | Common Sense Is Not So Common | Thu Dec 06 1990 09:17 | 16 |
|
Thank you everyone for your replies. Both my husband and i have always
wanted to know and we also feel the same way Bonnie (.13) feels:
"Those of us who are control freaks feel that if technology is
there....use it! It would drive me crazy to know I could know...but
not know."
I did get it. So, we're gonna go for it. I'm 3 months along now and
i haven't had an ultrasound yet and i don't know when my first one will
be but i'm hoping soon. I'll ask my midwife next week when i see her.
Although, when/if we find out i don't want to tell anyone else, we'll
let everyone else be surprised!
Brenda
|
542.17 | | TCC::HEFFEL | Vini, vidi, visa | Thu Dec 06 1990 10:20 | 21 |
| My OB group does not believe in giving ultrasounds if there is no
reason to, so we never had to make the choice. But Gary and I had talked
about it and decided that we would NOT want to know.
Our largest reason was Gary's mother (and some other relatives and
friends) are highly traditional. Girl == "lots of Pink frilly dresses". Gary
and I feel VERY strongly about gender sterotyping and the pink for girls/blue
for boys routine is a major hot button for us.
Did we need to know so that we could decorate Katie's room "correctly"?
PPPLLLLLPPPL!!! ( <= Raspberry :-) ) Heck No! Katie's room is done in primary
colors. They're more interesting for little babies to look at anyway. It says
so right here in my Owner's Operating Manual. :-)
I have no regrets about doing it that way. I wanted a boy. I got a
girl. I had one instant of "rats!" when they told me. Then I got to see/hold
the most perfect baby in the world and all thought of disappointment was gone.
No question that I want anything but what I have now.
Tracey
|
542.18 | save the best surprise for last! | CLOSET::CLOSET::FONTAINE | | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:11 | 14 |
| We don't get the choice with our health plan to have an ultrasound.
They ONLY do one if twins are suspected or if there are complications.
We don't want to know the sex of the unborn child. If you know ahead
of time, and tell friends and relatives as well, what do you say when you
call people when the baby is born? "Hey, we had the baby!" Some of the
fun and excitement is telling the news of the sex of the child. Another
reason we don't want to know is (not that there aren't enough surprises
with the birth!) but it is just a little something more to look forward to
as far as the "magic" goes after the baby is born.
I too and somewhat of a control freak, but this is one we prefer to leave
alone.
|
542.19 | another reason for not finding out in advance | AIMHI::HARRIS | | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:37 | 12 |
| I had an amneo so could have known if I wanted to. My husband didn't
want to know in advance. I decided not to find out until the birth.
I decided that I wanted time in advance to "bond" (I don't know if that
is a correct term for prenatal psychological attachment) with "baby",
without my developing unconscious preconceptions that might affect
the baby later.
In other words, I wanted my baby and me to start out even as far as
sexual identity was concerned.
|
542.20 | Another decision "FOR" | USCTR1::JTRAVERS | | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:46 | 11 |
| When I was 35 weeks I had an ultrasound. During the procedure the
technician put her hand over the screen and asked if we wanted to know
what it was. We decided that if John(hubby) could look at the screen and
tell, well, okay.. (I couldn't see the screen very well).. Well, he
determined it was a girl and was totally convinced to the point of
calling the baby "his Katie" from that moment on.. but until she was
actually born I wasn't totally convinced. I did not feel like the
surprise had been ruined. I was so concerned that she was
going to be a healthy baby - boy or girl - that even knowing what to
expect regarding to her gender did nothing to deflate my feelings at
her birth.
|
542.21 | HELLO MOOKIE | GENRAL::MARZULLA | | Thu Dec 06 1990 14:13 | 9 |
| Well - here's my two cents. One of the most memorable moments after
both of my children were born were the "what is it" dialog. I still
remember my doctors expressions and the reactions from both myself
and my husband upon learning that we had a boy/girl. I can tell you
it was pretty exciting to not only have the birth over with but to
actually FINALLY find out what sex of a child we had. I wouldn't want
to know in advance - even though we probably would have picked more
sex appropriate pet names for the unborn baby. Last name was MOOKIE!
|
542.22 | Another control freak... | KAOFS::M_FETT | Schreib Doch Mal! | Thu Dec 06 1990 18:28 | 23 |
| Funny, although I am somewhat of a control freak, both of us were
totally indifferent to knowing (or not knowing) the sex before birth.
It was the doctor's plan to only have 1 ultrasound, unless
complications were to set in later on.
So, this week we had the ultrasound. Other members of our family were
more interested in knowing, but since I am only 20 weeks, we weren't
sure that the topic would come up at all (itsy bitsy little
genitalia...) in the examination room, and well, it did not. So,
when my mother asked (she's been quite diplomatically knitting blankets
with pink AND blue in them up until now), I said "no mom, the baby's
legs were crossed."
Anyway, it looks fine and dandy, and as I type it seems to be moving
the furniture around in there....8-)
I think that if I had found out now, it would still be a surprise,
since I've heard of so many mistakes that I wouldn't really TRUST this
prediction until the baby is born anyway.... (I may work with high-
technology, but I don't have to trust it do I?)
Monica
|
542.23 | Don't find out if you care about the answer | RADIA::PERLMAN | | Thu Dec 06 1990 21:20 | 20 |
| I think people that feel very strongly about one sex or another should
NOT find out before the birth. I thought I felt strongly about it,
didn't know the sex beforehand, and can't remember feeling any
disappointment when my child turned out to be the "other" sex. (I
have one of each so nobody will know which sex I thought I preferred).
Mostly when I first heard the sex I was just glad labor was over, and by
the time the being-glad-labor-was-over feeling passed, I was already
holding and falling in love with my baby.
On the other hand, I knew someone who felt very strongly that she only
wanted a girl, and found out early on it was a boy. She spent the
remainder of her pregnancy being very angry at the to-be-born baby
for being the wrong sex, and fretting about how unpleasant bringing
up a boy was going to be. I've lost touch with her since slightly
before the birth, so I don't know how she's adjusted, but having
5 months to imagine all the worst things she imagined about little
boys seemed very bad. I believe everything would have gone much
more smoothly if she hadn't found out until the birth.
Radia
|
542.24 | well earned surprise! | VAX::BAKER | | Fri Dec 07 1990 08:04 | 3 |
| I enjoyed being surprised. It was nice after all that LABOR to have the
elation of discovering it was a boy or girl. We are lucky and have one
of each!
|
542.25 | | AIMHI::MAZIALNIK | | Fri Dec 07 1990 10:22 | 25 |
| My doctor didn't do an ultrasound, but I wouldn't want to know
the sex anyway. I think my main reason for that is because
it isn't 100% accurate. If they had to do an amnio and I would
know 100% what it was, I think I'd want to know.
As Eric was being born the doctor kept referring to him as "he".
She said she didn't know why she kept saying "he" since should
couldn't know for sure yet. She just thought it looked like a boy.
So I sort of felt it might be a boy, too. When Eric was born
they laid him on my stomach and his legs were up (blocking the
view). I just kept looking at his face saying "Oh, oh, oh" because
I he looked so perfect. After maybe 30 seconds or so I realized I
didn't even know the sex. I finally had to ask, "What is it?"
That's when I found out. I could have cared less either way if it
was a boy or girl, so there was no disappointment for me. I have a
question. How come so many of you are so determined to have either a
boy or a girl? To the point that it leads to disappointment? Even
though I now have a boy and if I had a second, I figure it might be nice
to have a girl, I still wouldn't be disappointed because another boy
would probably mean a closer pal for Eric. Also, little boys are just
so wonderful. I would have never realized how wonderful if I had a girl.
Donna
|
542.26 | | MAJORS::RUMBELOW | Take the money or open the box | Fri Dec 07 1990 11:18 | 62 |
| re: .25
>> Also, little boys are just so wonderful. I would have never
>> realised how wonderful if I had a girl.
Amazing! My thoughts exactly, only I think that little girls are
wonderful and I wouldn't have known how wonderful if I'd had a
little boy. Well, that's the way it should be, I suppose. I
think that the reason I think like that is that Alison is
wonderful, Alison is a girl, therefore girls are wonderful
(dubious logic, I know!) Anyone out there with twin boy and
girl who can tell us that they are so glad that they had one of
each sex, because now they know that boys and girls are equally
wonderful :-) (Sorry Donna, I'm not trying to make fun of you, I
know exactly how you feel)
I also agree with Donna (.25) about people expressing a
preference. It makes me very upset when I hear pregnant ladies
(or their partners) saying "Oh I do hope it's a boy" or "I'm
longing for a little girl". I know that whatever they have they
will love, and they will not want the baby to be other than what
it is. I think it upsets me because there's no point in
hoping for one thing or another, it's not going to change want
you will get. In a strange way I feel sorry for the unborn
child. It can't help being what it is.
I also wonder about families with three or more children of the
same sex. Do the last children owe their existence to fact that
their elder siblings were all boys or all girls, and their
parents were trying for something different? (This is not
intended to be a criticism of families with children of the same
sex, it's just something I can't help wondering about, so please
don't post lots of replies saying "Well I had 10 boys and I
couldn't care what sex they were," etc.)
Anyway to get back to the original topic of the note - I had four
ultrasounds, and at each one I resisted the temptation to find
out the baby's sex. I felt that finding out the baby's sex
before the birth was like peeking under the wrapping of a
Christmas present before Christmas. Also, I didn't mind whether
had a girl or a boy, so it didn't matter to me.
Now, after my flaming of people who are hoping for one particular
sex, I have to say that my husband wanted a boy. No big deal,
but he did express a definite preference. He never felt
particularly involved with my bump when I was pregnant, so I
don't think that knowing it was a girl-bump would have helped him
at all. As it turned out, he had already seen and fallen in love with
our baby by the time he heard the words "It's a girl" so it
didn't matter to him that she wasn't a boy!
As far as bonding goes - I didn't mind whether I had a girl or a
boy and I had felt very affectionate towards my bump when I was
pregnant, but I didn't fall instantly in love with our daughter
like my husband did. I didn't reject her, or anything like that,
I felt very fond of her, but I never felt an instant rush of
maternal love. The fondness gradually grew into love, and the
love just grew and grew over a period of weeks. But I don't
think that that has anything to do with know the sex in advance.
- Janet
|
542.27 | "To know...or not to know...that is the question" | 22254::CUPTS | | Fri Dec 07 1990 11:22 | 29 |
|
I've had 3 different experiences and thought each one was appropriate
for how I felt at the time. I didn't find out the sex of my 1st child.
Wanted to be surprised and all that, figured it was a boy and it was.
The second baby, I had an amnio because of some complications. Even
though the answer to the "big question" was there in my file, I opted
not to know. Sometimes it drove me nuts, the file just sitting there
and all the nurses knowing what sex my baby would be...but it seemed
to be even more tantalizing by not knowing. Boy again. The third
time I had another amnio. The results came back with some potential
genetic problems and then, after a few days, our concerns were quelled
and we were told the baby was fine. At that point we were so relieved
we said, "Sure, tell us what we're having - we're so relieved and we
feel so involved with this baby anyway, give us the news". The doctor
smiled, looked at my husband, looked at me and said "You're married to
Fred MacMurray...it's "MY THREE SONS". We had hoped for a girl but I
think knowing, and knowing in this particular situation, made it com-
forting and humorous.
Every once in a while I call my husband Steven Douglas just to get a
reaction! I certainly could use Uncle Bill around the kitchen these
days too!... ;-)
Whatever you decide - you're going to have so much FUN!
Good luck!
-dorothy
|
542.28 | | POWDML::SATOW | | Fri Dec 07 1990 12:26 | 35 |
| re: .23
Interesting theory. See .4 for a contrary view of someone who had strong
feelings and found out. It would be interesting to see how things turned out
with your friend.
re: .26
> I think it upsets me because there's no point in
> hoping for one thing or another, it's not going to change want
> you will get.
The same can be said about hoping for _anything_, such as a healthy baby, or a
baby with no genetic defects. Why should hoping for a boy or a girl be any
different? I can't help thinking that there is some "correct" way to feel.
IMHO, it's far more damaging to deny that you have a feeling than to have it,
and admit it. Admitting that you have it may make you better able to deal
with it, as .4 did. Denying it makes it more likely that the feelings will
come out in unintended ways. Please don't be hard on people for being honest,
or for not feeling like they "should" feel. The former is admirable, and the
latter is unavoidable.
> I felt that finding out the baby's sex
> before the birth was like peeking under the wrapping of a
> Christmas present before Christmas.
Excellent analogy. Suppose you wanted a pair of blue jeans, but you got a
frilly dress. If knowing ahead of time enable you to _avoid_ saying something
like "yuck! a dress! I don't wear dresses!" -- thereby hurting the feelings of
the person who gave it to you -- , then maybe you should find out. If you
would say it anyway, or if knowing it would spoil Christmas, then you
shouldn't find out.
Clay
|
542.29 | My reasons | CSC32::WILCOX | Back in the High Life, Again | Fri Dec 07 1990 14:43 | 7 |
| I have a couple reasons for wanting a boy. Perhaps my main reason is that
I cannot imagine possibly loving another girl with the intensity that I
love my daughter. On the other hand, I have absolutely no doubt that if
I do have another girl, I will love her as fiercely. The other reason I'd
like a boy is that I lost one last year.
Liz
|
542.30 | | 22254::CUPTS | | Fri Dec 07 1990 14:47 | 14 |
|
RE: .29
From someone who has 3 of one gender I can only say that I am
continually amazed at how different children can be from one another.
Regardless of their sex, each one is an individual and will capture
your heart in his or her own way.
Just enjoy the ride, it's phenomenal.
-dorothy
|
542.31 | | MAJORS::RUMBELOW | Take the money or open the box | Fri Dec 07 1990 14:57 | 14 |
| re .26 and .28 - oops, sorry, I didn't mean to be hard on anyone for
expressing a preference for boy or girl. I was just saying how I felt
about it, but I definitely don't expect everyone or anyone to feel the
same way as me. My husband expressed a preference for a boy, and
honestly I wasn't hard on him.
Frilly dress or blue jeans - I like it! I always thought of it as
"diamond necklace or diamond bracelet" - I don't mind which I have!
I've read all the replies to this note and I can understand people's
reasons for wanting to know the sex and not wanting to know the sex, so
I just thought I'd add my two-pennies worth.
- Janet
|
542.32 | Maybe we're too practical | ISLNDS::CALHOUN | | Mon Dec 10 1990 13:19 | 24 |
| After two children, both girls, I am surprised to look back and
see how practical my wife and I became. The first time around,
we had no baby stuff whatsoever, so we just waited on any of the
stuff that might be different for one sex vs the other. On the
second, we had all the "girl" stuff and needed to know whether to
lend it out or save it. It so happened that the AFP came back
abnormal, so we ended up doing an amnio with the second and were
able to determine without a doubt what the sex was. For us, it
didn't take away any of the wonderful experience of childbirth and
made our preparations much easier.
If we were to have another, I would absolutely want to know! As
an aside, my wife's OB/GYN will not allow any sex determination
based on ultrasounds (His response was always "I can absolutely
tell you it's a baby!"), so we couldn't have found out with the
first anyway. Also, I must admit, both Jan and I, after all of
the agony we went through with the abnormal AFP, felt that we'd
at least better get SOMETHING out of it!
Good luck with whatever you decide (but I'd be real cautious about
making major color choices based on an ultrasoud!!!)
Rich
|
542.33 | OOPPSSSSSS! | CSOA1::TULANKO | | Tue Dec 11 1990 14:09 | 13 |
| A friend of mine had several ultrasounds during her
pregnancy and they all swore it was a boy. This made
her husband very happy since they already had a girl -
he wanted a boy very much. So we had a shower for her
and bought her all this neat *boy* stuff. Well.....
when she finally delivered - oops!!!!!! She had a girl.
Needless to say there were a few confused moments in the
delivery room.
FWIW - my husband and I both want to be surprised at delivery.
Kara Tulanko
|
542.34 | No with 1st, yes with 2nd | CARTUN::MANDALINCI | | Tue Dec 11 1990 14:56 | 32 |
| With my first I didn't want to know at all. Yes, it did make planning
harder but now the way the room is decorated will handle either sex
with my second.
With the second, we want to know but have yet to get a definative
answer. The ultra-sound at 20 weeks said a girl but the baby didn't
flash and the technician said it "looks like a girl" based on the "fat
deposits" around the hips or the hip girth or something with the hips.
That doesn't sound definite to me at all so I'm not planning on it
being a girl; my husband is!
One of my nurse practitioners told my with my first it "sounded" like a
boy and she was right. I see her next week and will see what her
prediction is. I'd love a girl so we had one of each but my son was
such a wonderful baby, I wouldn't mind having another boy.
For the second it seems more practical to know. For the first, I liked
keeping everyone in suspense!!
Not to also "scare" people, but good friends of ours conveived their
first at about the same time one of their fathers died. They decided
immediately that the name would be Jeremy if it was a boy. An amnio
confirmed it was a boy quite early so they started calling the unborn
baby Jeremy. The mother once told me that if she every lost Jeremy to a
miscarriage or still birth it would have been so much more difficult to
handle because this unborn child had a complete identity. I would
think people at risk during their pregnancy might want to wait to find
out the sex until they are out of danger but it is usually the mothers
of high risk pregnancies who go through the tests that can comfirm the
sex without a doubt - a catch-22!!!
Andrea
|
542.35 | One of my "hot buttons" while pregnant | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Wed Dec 12 1990 14:07 | 21 |
| I didn't know the sex of my baby and *really* wanted to know it. My
only ultrasound was at 13 weeks, and I didn't have amnio.
The one thing that surprised me over and over was the way other people
would have opinions on this topic. When I was asked if I knew the sex,
I would say no. Then I would get a long story about how nice that was,
with the surprise and being like the old days. I usually would hear
some type of judgement in the response.
Each of us knows our own style. Judge for yourself and figure it out.
If we can figure out what whether to use a doctor or midwife, or home
birth or hospital birth, then I think each of us can figure out whether
we want to know the sex of the baby beforehand.
Has anyone else noticed this attitude? (I'll admit that most of the
time I heard this from grandmother types, including my own
mother-in-law...)
Judy
|
542.36 | Chinese way of determining sex of baby. | CLOSUS::HOE | Daddy, what's transision? | Fri Dec 14 1990 12:28 | 52 |
| I am enclosing a fun way of determining the sex of your baby.
This is supposedly an old Chinese way of determining the sex of a
baby. Since old Chinese society favours a boy child, you might
find this leaning that way.
To the woman's conception age, add one year since Chinese society
count the child as age 1 at birth; ie, year 0 begins at
conception.
Calvin Hoe
Will the Baby be a Boy or a Girl?
C Woman's Conceiving Age
o
n 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
c 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
e Jan g b g b g b b g b g b g b b b g b b g b g b g b g b b g
p Feb b g b g b b g b g b g b g g g b g b b g b g b g b g b b
t Mar g b g g b g b b b g b g g b b b b g b b g b g b g b g b
i Apr b g b g g b b g g b g g g g g b g b g b b b b g b g b g
o May b g b g b b g g g g g b g g g g g g b g b b g b g b b g
n Jun b b b g g g b b b g g b g g g g g g g b g g b g b g b g
Jul b b b g g b b g g b b b g g g g g g g g b g b b g b g b
M Aug b b b g b g g b b b b b g g g b g b g b g b g b b g b g
o Sep b b b g g b g b g b b b g g g g g g b g b g b g b b g b
n Oct b b g g g b g b g b b g g g g g g g b b g b g b g b b g
t Nov b g b g g b g b g g g g b g g g b b b g b g b g b b g b
h Dec b g b g g g g b g b g g b b b b b b b b g g g b g b g b
b=boy g=girl
CHART EXPLANATION
You can decide for yourself whether you will have a boy or a girl
by following this chart. The woman's age from 18 to 45 (Chinese
reckoning is that age 1 is at time of her birth) is the top
line while the months Jan to Dec is the month the baby is conceived.
By following the chart, you will be able to tell, in advance, whether
your baby will be a boy or a girl.
By following the column down for the woman's age to the row for the
month the baby was conceived, the gender of the baby can be determined.
For example, a 27 year old woman conceived her baby in January
(according to the Chinese Lunar calendar, beginning the first new moon
in January of the Julian Calendar); her baby will be a girl.
This chart, designed by a Chinese scholar, was discovered in an Emperor's
tomb near Bejing, China. The original chart resides in the Institute of
Science of Bejing. The accuracy of the chart has been proven by
thousands of people and is believed to be 99% accurate.
|
542.37 | Two girls would be wonderful | EXIT26::MACDONALD_K | | Fri Dec 14 1990 13:05 | 16 |
| Hey, I want to know the sex of my next child right now and I'm not
even pregnant!!! I'd love to have another girl and be able to re-use
a lot of Allyson's beautiful, barely-worn baby clothes, but if it's
not in the cards to have a girl, then I want to be able to give all
of this stuff away. I have four friends that are all about to have
babies and I know at least one of them is bound to have a girl.
I didn't know my daughter's sex til she was born, but I think I
would have liked to have known beforehand. My husband and I could
have escaped all of those fights we had over boys' names ;-).
If I have the choice to know beforehand next time, I think I'll opt
for knowing. But next time it really won't matter that much. I
already got exactly what I wanted the first time.
- Kathryn
|
542.38 | Right on! | ISLNDS::BARR_L | Have a Holly Jolly X-Mas | Fri Dec 14 1990 13:36 | 6 |
| re: .36
The chart was right on for me! My son was conceived in November
when I was 30 years old.
Lori B.
|
542.39 | Right off. | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Fri Dec 14 1990 15:14 | 12 |
|
In re: chart.
Piffle. It got mine just the way you would expect, namely 50%.
Anyway, as everybody should know, that silly chart has the wrong
factors. To have predictive value, it would have to use the number of
vowels in the paternal grandmother's last name (at her birth), plus the
results of the last prior off-year U.S. congressional election prior to
conception.
- bruce
|
542.40 | It works! | POWDML::SATOW | | Fri Dec 14 1990 16:49 | 7 |
| 100% accurate in our sample of two.
But question: Given the strong Chinese cultural preference for male children,
particularly first born, if the chart is 99% accurate, wouldn't that mean that
99% of first born Chinese children would be male?
Clay
|
542.41 | Am I missing something? | BUFFER::WARREN | | Mon Dec 17 1990 19:26 | 6 |
| Re .36: 50% accurate in our case.
Re .40: HUH?
T.
|
542.42 | Inscrutable... | MONMON::STOTTOR | European ACT - Service Industries | Tue Dec 18 1990 05:11 | 6 |
| Re. .41 HUH ?,
I think the author of .40 means that if 100% of Chinese people follow this
chart, and if 100% also prefer sons, and if the chart is 99% accurate, then
it follows that eventually 99% of Chinese people will be male. Presumably
this will go some way to resolving the population problem there ;-)
|
542.43 | | POWDML::SATOW | | Tue Dec 18 1990 08:34 | 10 |
| re:.41, .42
.42's is correct as to what I meant.
> Presumably this will go some way to resolving the population problem there ;-)
Yes, particularly, if the allegations about the governments attempts to limit
couples to one child are correct.
Clay
|
542.44 | Not quite accurate... | MONMON::STOTTOR | European ACT - Service Industries | Tue Dec 18 1990 09:36 | 1 |
| BTW, the chart is 0% effective for me...
|
542.45 | | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Tue Dec 18 1990 13:34 | 9 |
|
In re: .40 - .42
I think the trick here is that the chart is only 99% accurate in
retrospect. If consulted in advance of conception it loses its
predictive value.
- Bruce
|
542.46 | | USAT02::HERNDONK | | Thu Sep 05 1991 19:08 | 18 |
|
Well, I am so excited...I put a note in here a while ago about
'physical symptoms' a mom gets in determining a baby's sex.
I thought having oily skin, zits, etc. meant having a girl and
I wanted a boy bad...
Well, guess what...I'm having a boy! I saw the little bugger's
plumbing real good at my ultrasound on Tuesday...I'm about 5 1/2
months (1 week sooner than my doc thought) and still barely feel
the baby move but at least I saw him...the lab tech couldn't
believe I didn't feel him....saw him drinking amnio fluid and
playing with his hands and feet....nothing like I've ever
experienced....
so for all you other 'oily' skinned prego women out there...you
could be having a boy.....
Kristen
|
542.47 | IT'S BETTER TO WAIT & BE SUPRISED!! | CSCOA1::PIWOWAR_T | | Mon Dec 16 1991 15:22 | 13 |
| Well, with my first ultrasound we found out that the baby was breech &
the nurse immediatly knew what the sex of the baby was? So, of course
I thought its a boy! Everyone would say to me your having a boy
because I carried the baby low. The night before I was scheduled to
have a C-section because the baby was still breech I had talked with my
father and he told me that he feels that I going to have a baby girl.
Well to my suprise on April 11th 1989 I had a big baby girl 9 1/2 lbs.
I'm pregnant with my second child and is do to have a ultrasound
January 3rd, 1992. I wouldn't mind knowing what the baby sex is but my
husband said "we didn't know with the first one so, let it be a suprise
to" I'm due May 21st, 1992 only time will tell!!
Tiki
|