T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
539.1 | | PHAROS::PATTON | | Tue Dec 04 1990 09:28 | 4 |
| Oh no, all my angst was for nothing!! :-)
Lucy
|
539.2 | | SCARGO::GALPIN | | Tue Dec 04 1990 11:53 | 5 |
| Thanks for sharing this with us. My guilt of using Pampers is now
gone!
Diane
|
539.3 | We can't win! | CRONIC::ORTH | | Tue Dec 04 1990 12:08 | 11 |
| It's funny. We use home-washed diapers strictly for cost sake...no one
will ever convince me it *costs* more money to launder at home! But we
use disposable when going out or going away. And it's amazing the
condemnation we've heard (subtly, of course) from those who know we
wash our own at home!I guess they assumed we were some sort of super
environmentally consciuos consumers and found it incongruous that we
wouldn't care to lug bags full of dirty/wet cloth diapers around with
us! Now we can tell them that they can rest easy about the
disposables...and bug us about the cloth, I guess!
-dave--
|
539.4 | Only diaper debate we had was WHICH disposable to buy! | CSDPIE::JENSEN | | Tue Dec 04 1990 12:51 | 7 |
|
Well, go ahead, F-L-A-M-E O-N me! But Jim/I never once considered
anything BUT disposable diapers.
Sorry!!!
Dottie
|
539.5 | Don't trust the quick "bottom line" news reports | MINAR::BISHOP | | Tue Dec 04 1990 14:44 | 43 |
| I've read some honest attempts to do similiar long-term analyses of
various competing technologies (cotton shirts vs. drip-dry comes to
mind).
Which technology "wins" winds up depending on lots of debatable
assumptions: in the wash-at-home vs. disposable question, those
asumptions would include:
o How many washings a cotton diaper can take;
o How much detergent is used, and how much it costs;
o Whether hot water is used, and how it is heated;
o Whether a dryer is used, and how it is heated;
o Whether other chemicals are used, and how much they cost;
o How often both kinds are changed, and whether they are
changed at the same rate;
o How many cloth diapers one buys;
o How many children one has (to re-use diapers on);
o What the residual value of cloth diapers is when the child
no longer uses them;
o How much shorter a life-span the washer and dryer will have;
o How much to value your labor time washing;
o How much time it takes;
o Number of shopping trips for disposables vs. detergent;
o Cost and pollution result of extra car trips or extra load;
o What is the pollution cost of distribution of the diapers
to supermarkets;
o Ditto the distribution of water and electricity;
o Ditto garbage pick-up;
o and on and on...
It's very possible that some people who use a small number of cloth
diapers which they air-dry in the summer and have cheap gas heat
and many children, and use low amounts of cheap detergent, etc. would
produce very little pollution compared to average usage of disposables,
while a family with one child who wash with super-hot water heated by
electricity and use lots of bleach, flabric softener and and so on would
be far more polluting than that average usage of disposables.
So don't rely too heavily on the "bottom line" of a report like the
one cited; unless you can compare your usage pattern to the ones in
the report, you might be way ahead or way behind in cost and pollution.
-John Bishop
|
539.6 | Right... but | EXPRES::GILMAN | | Tue Dec 04 1990 15:45 | 4 |
| John, generally the reports state only the horrors of disposables. By
posting the article I was trying to point out just what you said about
the disposables.... its not that simple. But it was refreshing to see
something good said about a convenience item.
|
539.7 | Not MY PhD Thesis! | POWDML::SATOW | | Tue Dec 04 1990 16:50 | 4 |
| Exhuming landfills to find 10 year old baby poops? Yuck! THAT'S dedication
to science.
Clay
|
539.8 | Consider the intangible benefits of cotton ... | SCAACT::RESENDE | Digital, thriving on chaos? | Tue Dec 04 1990 20:47 | 8 |
| But what the article didn't mention was the wonderful, soft, fluffy
feel of a clean, white cotton diaper. We too use disposables when we
travel, but there's nothing like patting that little butt with a *real*
cotton diaper on it!
Just MHO...
Steve
|
539.9 | | PHAROS::PATTON | | Wed Dec 05 1990 08:36 | 9 |
| Steve,
...Not to mention that cute little duck-waddle when they start walking,
and they're wearing two cotton diapers and a double-thickness wool
diaper cover...Daniel's butt stuck out about 6" behind him. When he
gave up diapers it looked like he'd lost several pounds!
Lucy
|
539.10 | | CLUSTA::BINNS | | Wed Dec 05 1990 12:47 | 9 |
| And at the risk of soundly too cynical, who are Franklin Associates of
Prairie Rapids (or whatever), Kansas, and who paid them to do this
study?
$10/week to wash diapers? Highly unlikely.
(make that $20/week until recently when we got down to only one in
diapers)
Kit
|
539.11 | Hope it works | WR2FOR::BELINSKY_MA | | Wed Dec 05 1990 16:55 | 13 |
| I was ready to use disposables when Ellen was born in September, but my
husband convinced me to go with cloth. We are really happy with them,
and are planning to continue using them. However, Ellen wears a thick
disposable at night - she sleeps 11 hours - and wet cotton worn for
that long is not comfortable. I don't want to double up.
It would be nice if Proctor & Gamble's efforts to make their
disposables degrade work out. Aside from the concern over bacteria,
viruses and the like, the sheer amount of diapers that we as a society
throw away bothers me. (And now we have throw-away cameras thanks to
Kodak. Where will it all end?)
Mary
|
539.12 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Dec 06 1990 08:56 | 7 |
| re .11 (a slight rathole)
> (And now we have throw-away cameras thanks to
> Kodak. Where will it all end?)
Since the cameras are sent in to processing plants, they're easy to recycle
(unlike disposable diapers).
|
539.13 | Just a couple opinions! | NRADM::TRIPPL | | Fri Dec 21 1990 12:57 | 13 |
| re the previous reply....those throw away cameras are sent WHERE? Have
you checked out Spags school house film developing operation lately? I
have, I dropped my first AND LAST disposable camera there last week,
they just drop the shell in the trash! As for picture quality, in a
word NEVER AGAIN...Lousy!
I second the sentiment of .7 that has to be dedication!
By the way...is there *anything else* beside disposables? I always
thought the bags of cloth diapers should be renamed Dusting Cloths!!
Lyn
|