T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
528.1 | I was tested for it... | STAR::LEWIS | | Wed Nov 28 1990 08:04 | 7 |
| I don't remember all that much, but I do know that I was routinely
tested (once) at some point between 28 and 32 weeks for strep-b. I think if
the test had been positive, I would have been put on antibiotics and
continually tested. I remember asking if it a positive result would
increase my chances for a cesearean delivery and the midwife said no.
Sue
|
528.2 | I had the same infection.. | SALEM::EDRY | | Wed Nov 28 1990 11:21 | 11 |
| When I was pregnant I had the Strep B infection. I had it pretty
much throughout my pregnancy. I was on antibiotics most of my
pregnancy. What they did for me was when I went into labor they
put an IV in me with the antibiotic, and I was informed to go to the
hospital immediately if my water broke.
I was under the impression that this infection could possibly cause
phenomia (sp), they didn't say much else. Did your daughter become
ill or were they just testing her?
-Julie
|
528.3 | How did you know? | TRACTR::MAZUR | | Wed Nov 28 1990 11:37 | 16 |
| To both women who replied--
Why were you tested/how did you know you had the infection?
I was never tested. My water broke at 5:30 a.m. on a Monday,
I became very ill at noon the following day. I told my doctor
I felt feverish and nauseated--he told me I was just anxious.
I was achey all over and felt worse and worse ever second --
I did not register a temp. until 3:30pm--and then it shot right
up to 102 degrees. That's when they started IV's and put me
on Pitocin to bring on labor.
Alexa was born at 8:58 pm that night by C-Section. Personally,
I think they waited much too long.
Sheryl
|
528.4 | To answer Julie's question-To answer Julie- | TRACTR::MAZUR | | Wed Nov 28 1990 11:43 | 17 |
| Julie--
Alexa and I both had the infection. They started her on I.V.'s
as soon as she was born and she had to stay in the hospital 3 days
longer than I did. She had the bacteria on her surface (skin, nose,
mouth, ears) and on her stomach walls. That's why they did the
blood work and spinal tap--to make sure it didn't get that far.
Fortunately -- after waiting the seven days--we found out that
the blood and spinal fluid were clean--thank God!
Spinal Meningitis can be a result of this infection, I've also
read that if it is not detected and treated in time it can cause
brain damage and even death. I didn't know this when I was in the
hospital, but now I do and I want to find out all I can about it.
Sheryl
|
528.5 | paraphrase of article about it | TLE::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Wed Nov 28 1990 12:07 | 27 |
| Apparently it's only been discovered recently and many doctors
aren't aware of it yet. One of the women's magazines had a big
article about it earlier this fall -- I think around September.
Sorry I can't be more specific but if you went to your library and
looked through the back issues you could find it -- there's a big
heading about "hidden threat to your baby" or words to that
effect.
I'll try to remember the article as best I can.
Apparently most people carry the strep-b bacteria on their skin,
and in pregnant women it sometimes works up the birth canal to teh
bladder, where it causes a very mild bladder infection that
doesn't show up on the standard tests because the standard tests
check for various kinds of staph bacteria. Then when the water
breaks, the bacterial can get in and infect the baby, too.
It's not usually life-threatening if the doctors know the mother
has the infection so they can start antibiotics right away and do
the tests .4 talks about. I think the article said that if the
baby doesn't develop meningitis from it, once she's over the
fever, the disease is over. It's not like a birth defect or
anything that leaves permanent effects.
I wish I could remember more for you.
--bonnie
|
528.6 | Nice of the Drs to tell me.. | SALEM::EDRY | | Wed Nov 28 1990 12:52 | 19 |
| Well... that's really interesting to know... Now I understand
why they we're so concerned when I came down with this infection.
They discovered the infection for me when I went for my first
prenatal visit. When they checked my urine they discovered that
I had a bladder infection, so basically they put me on medication
right from the begining. they would test me approx. ten days after
I started the medication, I went I'd say about 5 months of the
pregnancy on amoxicillan or ampicillan. As far as the urine samples
were showing around 7 months was that I no longer had the infection,
but one of the doctors decided to do a pap smear an the infection
showed up thru this. I was told from day one that I would be
delivering this baby with a IV attached to me. That I had nothing
to worry about.. nice of them to tell me what *could* have happened.
I'm glad your daughter is doing well, it's always so sad to see such
a small baby ill. (an a new mom worried sick...)
-Julie
|
528.7 | because they always do it, I guess... | STAR::LEWIS | | Wed Nov 28 1990 12:53 | 8 |
| > To both women who replied--
>
> Why were you tested/how did you know you had the infection?
Why? As I recall, it was standard procedure with my doctors to test for
it. Just a simple culture; similar to a pap smear.
Sue
|
528.8 | Woman's Day article | CSS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Nov 28 1990 22:29 | 7 |
| The October thirtieth issue of Woman's Day has an article about strep B
infections. For more information, send a self-addressed stamped
envelope to the Group B Strep Association, P.O. Box 16515, Chapel Hill,
N.C. 27516.
If you would like a copy of the article, send me a mail message with
your mail stop.
|
528.9 | STREP B | DEMON::MARRAMA | | Thu Nov 29 1990 11:12 | 10 |
|
I saw my OB this week and the nurse told me that my next visit they are
going to take a culture. I asked what for, she told me for Strep B. I
got a little nervous because I didn't know what it was. She said that
doctors usually test for it around your 26th week. If the test comes
back positive the baby and I will be treated for this right after
delivery. I checked with my sisters who all had baby's and they never
heard of it.
|
528.10 | it can cause pneumonia | 6348::ORTH | | Thu Nov 29 1990 14:09 | 9 |
| My sister's first baby got a severe pneumonia from strep B. Her water
broke when she was 7.5 mos. pregnant, and she went about 5 days before
delivering (in hosp., under dr's care, to try and stop contractions).
They also had her on IV antibiotics, but the baby got it anyway. Sadly,
this baby died, but not from the pneumonia...they said that although it
was severe, it was treatable. The baby had a bowel disease which caused
her to die at 3 days old.
--dave--
|
528.11 | Evan Tested Positive For Beta Strep | CSC32::DUBOIS | The early bird gets worms | Thu Nov 29 1990 15:38 | 30 |
| I was induced late in the pregnancy by the doctor breaking my water.
My baby was not born until 30 hours later and 2 days after his birth
he got a high fever. He tested positive for Beta Strep. Shellie and
I both went home thinking that he was going to die, because a friend of hers
had a daughter with Beta Strep and we knew it could be fatal (her
daughter was treated, and was fine 10 years later). Apparently because
we had been so knowledgable about everything else, the doctors and nurses
thought that we *knew* it wasn't a big deal if found early and treated,
so they didn't tell us until the next day that he was going to be *fine*.
They had had no idea that we had been so worried.
He did have to have a spinal tap to make sure he didn't have meningitis,
and he screamed. We could hear him in the next room (we didn't want to
watch). He was in the intensive care nursery for 5 days (they let him
out early, but we had to come by twice a day for shots - he learned to
HATE the car, but that passed). We have some really SAD pictures of us
at the hospital with him, especially the day when I was leaving and he was
staying and we thought we were going to lose him. He also looked a *sight*
with the IV in his head (not the hands because he might jerk it off) and
all of the monitor wires on him that week. He did look pretty humorous at
nearly 9 pounds, though, next to a 3 pound little boy. I think the nurses
called him something like "humongo baby" (I know *we* did). :-)
For us it turned out that he didn't have Beta Strep after all; it was a
false positive. Later tests revealed this, but we never did know what
he had. If the next baby turns up with Beta Strep, though, we won't be
nearly so worried. We'll know that they can easily fix it, and it will
just be a few days before s/he gets home.
Carol
|
528.12 | yes, that's the article | TLE::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Mon Dec 03 1990 09:23 | 6 |
| re: .8
That sounds like it must be the article I saw . . . thanks for
posting the address.
--bonnie
|
528.13 | What is Strep "B"? | CLT::KOBAL::CJOHNSON | Eat, drink and see Jerry! | Wed Oct 30 1991 13:17 | 20 |
|
Does anyone know what "Strep B" is? I was watching a show last
nite (Rescue 911) and a woman who was pregnant contracted
Strep "B". I guess she didn't realize she had it and passed
it along to her unborn child. When the child was born it
was very sick and they said that Strep "B" (I also heard
the doctor say the word "menengitis" a few times. I left
the room for a minute and totally missed the explanation
of what Strep B is) can cause brain damage and unfortunately,
this baby had such severe brain damage that it didn't make it.
The mother said that she wanted expectant mothers to be aware
of this and she also said that people just assume this is
the regular strep (like strep throat) but I guess it isn't
(not sure if it's just a more serious form of it or not).
I'd appreciate if anyone could enlighten me on this.
Thanks,
Chris
|
528.14 | Should be a routine test, ask for sure. | STAR::LEWIS | | Wed Oct 30 1991 13:21 | 4 |
| It was routine practice during my pregancy to test for strep-b. 28 or
32 weeks, I think. I was told that if it were positive there were steps
to be taken to prevent the baby from exposure. Antibiotics plus
re-testing.
|
528.15 | I cried for the parents | MCIS5::TRIPP | | Wed Oct 30 1991 14:36 | 18 |
| I, personally, don't recall any blood being drawn during either of my
pregnancies specifically for Strep-B. I saw the program as well, and
felt that even with my medical background the explaination was poor at
best. The only thing concrete I can say it that it isn't really like a
strep throat, but more a form of meningitis.(inflamation of the
menegies part of the brain). I will check further over the next few
days to see if I can offer a little better explaination.
I don't know about anyone else, but I burst into tears when they showed
the parents at the cemetary. I was alone, husband was a class,
thankfully AJ was already asleep, I just felt like I needed to hug
someone, like the parents of every infant who had been through a loss.
But then again, those of us who have buried an infant might be more
sensative to that kind of scene. (and it's been over 6 years for me).
That piece of film has been bothering me all day.
lyn
|
528.16 | thats for sure | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Wed Oct 30 1991 15:58 | 12 |
|
>>But then again, those of us who have buried an infant might be more
>>sensative to that kind of scene.
I still refuse to watch anything or read anything involving loss
or health troubles with infants. Just lately have managed to hold
on during birth scenes....
have a hug on me, Lyn...
Monica
|
528.17 | | PROXY::HOPKINS | Volunteer of the month | Thu Oct 31 1991 09:20 | 4 |
| I sit and watch these shows too and wonder why. I cried through that
whole part of the show but couldn't change the channel.
Marie
|
528.18 | Pure Panic... | NEWPRT::NEWELL_JO | Jodi Newell - Irvine, California | Thu Oct 31 1991 12:37 | 11 |
| I can't watch *any* show that deals with drownings. I've never
known anyone who has drown but as an infant I was a near death
victim of suffocation and feel I harbor intense fear of any kind
of oxygen deprivation. If I'm subjected to any story of drowning,
I sleep bad for about a week. Coincidently, when I was a child,
I used to hyperventilate whenever Seahunt was on TV.
The mind is poweful.
Jodi-
|
528.19 | I think it's new | TLE::RANDALL | liberal feminist redneck pacifist | Fri Nov 01 1991 11:30 | 8 |
| >I, personally, don't recall any blood being drawn during either of
>my pregnancies specifically for Strep-B.
I think they only started doing this routinely about a year and a
half ago. I didn't have it for David, who just turned two, but my
neighbor had it for her daughter, who was born at Thanksgiving.
--bonnie
|
528.20 | just fyi | STAR::LEWIS | | Fri Nov 01 1991 13:40 | 7 |
| >I, personally, don't recall any blood being drawn during either of
>my pregnancies specifically for Strep-B.
It wasn't a blood test; it was a cervical or vaginal swab culture.
Sue
|
528.21 | a note from the base-noter | TRACTR::MAZUR | | Wed Nov 06 1991 13:26 | 33 |
| RE: .13
Hi Chris,
I'm the basenoter--and it's been 15 months since my daughter
was born with the Group B Strep Bacteria. I've learned a lot
about it since that time.
It's a FEROCIOUS bacteria -- there's no doubt about that!
from what I've read (mostly in Woman's Day, American Baby etc) and
what I've learned from the doctors-- my understanding is that some
(completely healthy) women just carry this bacteria and it lies
dormant until a major hormonal change (like pregnancy or labor)
occurs...then sometimes it activates and is passed on to the baby--
and sometimes it doesn't. It is speculated that in my case, because
my water broke 4 1/2 weeks early -- that I contracted the bacteria from
lying around in the hospital for 40 hours--which was FAR too
long --but that is another story!!! No doubt I will be tested
if I ever become pregnant again.
My daughter was tested at birth and the Beta Strep bacteria was
found on her skin, in her mouth and nose, and on the walls of her
stomach. Antibiotics were started immediately, and because the
doctors found the bacteria in her stomach they did several blood
tests and performed a spinal tap. After a very nerve wracking
week, the results came back negative--the bacteria was stopped
in her stomach--thank GOD! Which means that she was born
(by emergency C-Section) just in time. Today, Alexa is a
beautiful, extremely active 15 month old--whom the doctors
refer to as PRECOCIOUS! If only I knew then, what I know
now...
Sheryl
|
528.22 | associated with early labor | SSVAX::MARGOLIS | | Mon Mar 02 1992 12:04 | 19 |
| I am now at 34 weeks, and after a series of "vaginitis" symptoms,
a month or two back tested positive for beta strep. I had one round
of antibiotics, and within a week had the symptoms again. My doctor
told me that it is common but not usually active, and unless it is
active, no treatment is recommended. (The anitbiotics have side effects
of their own, and that apparently outweighs the risks to the baby of
beta strep.) She also informed me that active beta strep is associated
with premature labor, so to take serious any signs of early labor.
She also said that even if the baby is "colonized", the chances
of him/her having an infection is not high enough to warrant
antibiotics. I also think she said that the infant can develop
an active infection for a period of several months. The pediatrician
will be notified of the presence of beta strep, so they can monitor for
the pneumonia, etc. that are potential. I will be talking with our
pediatrician about her views of beta strep before birth.
|
528.23 | more info? | TRACTR::MAZUR | | Fri Apr 03 1992 13:34 | 13 |
| Hi,
I would be interested in knowing anymore information that you
would like to share regarding Beta Strep.
Did you have any flu-like symptoms?
Best of luck to you and your little one--it is good that you
were tested and your doctors are aware. Everything should be
just fine!
Sheryl
|