T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
483.1 | This is a "plus" for a "private" home-care provider .... | CSDPIE::JENSEN | | Mon Nov 05 1990 09:17 | 37 |
| Andrea:
All I can add is ...
When Jim/I were "scouting for a daycare center", all three centers made
it PERFECTLY CLEAR that if your child runs a temp (and there's a
magical number - 100??) or "appears sick", you are immediately
summonsed to pick him/her up. S/he can not return UNTIL their temp
is normal and s/he's well again ... OR ... s/he's been on antibotics
for 48 hours.
Now I have a kid who's lucky if she can get through ONE MONTH without
an ear infection. Pedi believes her ear canals are both short and
narrow, thus any little "change" (teething, colds, allergies, sinuses,
etc.) will swell them up and WAM-BAM another ear infection. JA
responds very well to the antibotics (24-48 hours) and we have this
down to a science and can pretty much "predict" them before they turn
into a real infection, BUT if JA were to be rejected from daycare for
every fever and every ear infection and every cold ... well, I would
never get in a full week at work!
I, too, have a very supportive manager and there are many times I feel
it best to "work from home" to be with JA, however, we have an
excellent "home care provider" who not only is a "second-Mom" to JA,
but also doesn't hesitate to keep us informed of anything her own kids
may be experiencing ... or JA may be experiencing ... and let's "US"
decide the level of risk we want to take or inflict. This has worked
out GREAT!
I would treat "contagious diseases" with a lot more caution than the
normal day-to-day stuff (ear infections, runny noses, etc.) ...
but the day care centers we interviewed seemed to take "everything"
seriously ... so I'd be surprised if any kid could return with any
signs of illness.
Dottie
|
483.2 | Incubation period could be long | SCAACT::COX | Kristen Cox - Dallas ACT Sys Mgr | Mon Nov 05 1990 21:10 | 19 |
| My daycare has a policy similar to Dottie's. If the temp is more than
xx degrees (I think 100, but maybe less with older kids), or if they
are visibly ill, then you come get them immediately - in the mean time
they wait in another room. I have never had to go get Kati or stay
home sick with her but, just incase, I have her enrolled in a sick
program at the local hospital (like a sick day care).
The problem is that many symptoms for many illnesses do not appear
for quite a while - the incubation period is quite long. So often
times I could imagine a child being exposed to a germ long before
anyone knows that another child has it. This is part of socialization
IMO, and it will also happen at schools.
Also, my day care is quite a bit more lenient in the infant room than
any other. They get to know each child and if one is prone to ear
infections, and they KNOW s/he has an ear infection, they will not call
the parents right at the fever cutoff mark.
Kristen
|
483.3 | Children will get sick! | PARVAX::BENNETT | Butterfly | Tue Nov 06 1990 16:21 | 43 |
| Andrea,
I can understand your frustration. I also cannot understand why parents bring
their sick children into daycare.
My daughter, Alyssa, has been in day care since she was 3 months old (she will
be a year on friday). She is the type of baby that catches things very
easily. At 14 weeks old she got her first ear infection.
At 4 months of age she caught the DREADFUL "Hand Foot and Mouth disease.
She also got the blisters in the mouth first, a couple days after
that is when the blisters on her hands and feet showed up. I would not
bring her into daycare for 2 reasons. 1. She was unbearable to be around/all
she wanted was to be held and 2. I would not like the other children to
catch this disease.
My daycare center does have a policy that I highly agree with.
1. 101 fever or higher - the child must leave the center until all is well
for 24 hours
2. Diarrhea twice within one hour the child must leave the center until
all is well for 24 hours
3. Chicken Pox - the child must be out of the center until the doctor lets
the center know that the child is no longer contagious
4. Hand Foot and Mouth - the same applies as to # 3
5. Miscellaneous (Ring worm, etc) - must be treated by doctor and have a note
I am very much involved in my day care center. I am on the Parents Executive
Committee, this way I know more about what goes on and if I feel that there
is a problem I can help change it. Talking with the staff, they have
mentioned that they have called parents to notify them of their sick child and
some parents get angry that their child is sick. Also at times Parents
will disguise a child's illness and bring them into the center. This
upsets me because they are the ones that are infecting all of the other
children.
Regards,
Bethany
|
483.4 | It can be tough to stay home | POWDML::SATOW | | Wed Nov 07 1990 07:47 | 37 |
| I think that one reason that sick kids end up in daycare is that not all
parents work for understanding managers, or have other resources available.
For some parents it's no work, no income, and/or miss work, lose your job.
Practices vary widely, even within DEC. Some people may have to take sick
time or vacation time that they don't have.
That's not an excuse, but it's reality for some. And even if you work for an
understanding manager, staying home for kids' illenesses can be really tough.
I remember one stretch when I got shingles, from which my children got chicken
pox (consecutively, not at the same time), then everybody's favorite, head
lice, struck my daughter's class. Between all that, my wife and I could easily
have missed four consecutive weeks of work between us. We were fortunate that
Grampa is retired and within commuting distance.
It's also true that the diseases strike with varying degrees of severity. We
PROBABLY sent our kids to daycare with hand, foot, and mouth, not because we
were irresponsible, but because we didn't even realize they had it. The only
symptom that showed up was the cold sores. The only reason that we suspect
they had it was that *I* came down with a case -- it was very mild, but I had
all the symptoms.
There are also diseases that are highly contagious, but are easily treatable,
and sometimes don't even cause discomfort -- an example being conjunctivitis.
I remember spending some very frustrating days at home with a pink-eyed kid
who felt fine and who wanted to got to "school".
And I won't even mention head lice (woops, guess I already did).
I think that the policies mentioned in .0 and .3 are sound and reasonable, and
in my experience fairly typical. I personally draw my line at "sniffles". I
don't feel particularly bad about sending a child with a mild case of the
"sniffles" to day care and or school.
In my experience, day care centers are more rigorous about sending sick kids
home.
Clay
|
483.5 | Take Certain Illnesses Seriously Please | CURIE::POLAKOFF | | Wed Nov 07 1990 11:07 | 35 |
|
Parents can request that their daycare center send children home for
certain symptoms, ie: suspected chicken pox.
I've requested that my daycare center, at the sign, rumor, etc. of
chicken pox--notify me immediately--isolate and send home the suspected
ill child
immediately, and let me get Hannah out of there immediately.
I am pregnant with #2--and I've never had chicken pox. When I was
pregnant with Hannah, it wasn't a concern because first of all, I
believed I was immune (my mother swears she had me play with kids with
chicken pox so I would get it--and I didn't!), and secondly, because I
wasn't around kids.
My doctor tested me for immunity this time around (it's a simple blood
test) and lo and behold--I don't have any immunity. Chicken pox cause
birth defects in pregnant women (if the pregnant woman gets chicken
pox).
My daycare center has been extremely vigilant and all the parents have
been alerted and are cooperating--any small rash or anything--and the
kid stays home until a Dr. diagnoses. Everyone has been great.
After I give birth, everyone can relax again--I assume I'll get it one
of these days and feel that standards can be relaxed once the baby
comes...
Just an aside about sick kids and sending them to daycare. Please make
sure that you are not going to infect a pregnant woman and endanger the
life of the fetus.
Bonnie
|
483.6 | | CSC32::WILCOX | Back in the High Life, Again | Wed Nov 07 1990 19:47 | 6 |
| One really wonderful thing our Children's World in Colorado Springs
just started is that if our child is ill and we take them to the
sick child program administered through the hospital, the CW will
reimburse the cost! I think this is great!
Liz
|
483.7 | | MAJORS::RUMBELOW | Take the money or open the box | Thu Nov 08 1990 07:50 | 13 |
| re: .5
Has there been some new research done to show that chicken pox virus
can harm the fetus? I studied Microbiology (several years ago) and we
were told that only a few viruses cause damage to the fetus, and
chicken pox (varicella) virus definately was not one of them. If a
pregnant woman catches German Measles (Rubella) in the first few months
of pregnancy, that can definately harm the fetus, though.
Good luck for the rest of your pregnancy, and hope you manage to avoid
all these nasty germs.
- Janet
|
483.8 | | AKOV13::MUNSEY | | Thu Nov 08 1990 08:15 | 12 |
| re: .5 and .7
Not being a doctor, I was not going to add this, but since .7 did...
I am pregnant and have recently been exposed to the chicken pox.
I was also exposed during my first pregnancy. My doctor says that
even if I caught them, the risk of fetal harm is almost zero. Rubella
is the disease to be concerned about.
.5 Have you talk with your doctor?
Penny
|
483.9 | my ob said the same thing | TLE::RANDALL | self-defined person | Thu Nov 08 1990 10:07 | 4 |
| I was told the same thing as .5 about chicken pox when I was
pregnant last year.
--bonnie
|
483.10 | "American Baby" magazine talked about this last summer
| STIKEE::CREAN | | Thu Nov 08 1990 10:23 | 13 |
| This topic came up while I was pregnant last year. I was exposed to someone
who developed chicken pox but I wasn't sure if I had had them as a child.
The doctor told me to report any rashes immediately. She also said that the
medical profession was reconsidering the risk to the fetus from chicken pox.
Shortly after that, I read an article in American Baby magazine (sometime
between June & September, I think) that confirmed what the doctor had
told me. Unfortunately, I don't remember any specifics from the article
but you might want to try to find it.
- Terry
|
483.11 | Chicken Pox DEFINETLY Cause Birth Defects | MR4DEC::POLAKOFF | | Mon Nov 12 1990 11:14 | 47 |
|
Yes, believe me, I am CERTAIN that chicken pox in pregnant women cause
birth defects in the fetus. There is now proof that this is so--a new,
recent study. The birth defects can be very serious and the fetus is
most at risk in the 1st and 3rd trimester.
In the 1st trimester, as the baby develops, all systems are at risk.
During the 2nd trimester, there still is risk, but not as great as in
the 1st trimester--since all systems are in place--everything is just
growing bigger. The danger in the 3rd trimester is that the woman will
have the chicken pox during delivery (or be carrying the virus during
delivery)--and the newborn is *very* suseptible to chicken pox.
Apparently, infant death, caused by maternal chicken pox at delivery is
not uncommon in those women who have had chicken pox during delivery.
So.....
There is a vaccine available against chicken pox--but it is not yet
been approved by the FDA. The vaccine has been in use for approx.
10 years specifically for leukemia patients who have not been exposed
to the C. Pox virus. Apparently, C. Pox can be fatal for leukemia
patients. The good news is that the vaccine appears to have no side
effects. The bad news is that it is not long-lasting and has different
longetivity for different people (the longest it has lasted so far has
been 7 years--but if differs widely amongst people).
The FDA is loathe to legalize it--they don't want large populations of
teenagers or adults who were vaccinated in childhood to suddenly come
down with C. Pox. C. Pox in adults is MUCH more serious than in
children.
I have spoken to the M.D. who is currently administering the vaccine at
Dana Farber. She will be happy to vaccinate me AFTER I give birth, but
she will not vaccinate me now--being pregnant--and I fully agree with
her. We discussed vaccinating Hannah--but decided that if Hannah gets
exposed--so do I--so vaccinating her would not necessarily prevent me
from getting C. Pox. Also, I'd rather experiment on myself than on her
anyway!
So, again, PLEASE, if you suspect that your child has an infectious
disease--or has been exposed to one--PLEASE mention it to others. In
most cases, people won't really care. But to that one person in a
million....
Bonnie
|