T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
311.1 | Let us know... | HYSTER::DELISLE | | Wed Sep 05 1990 10:46 | 23 |
| The only thing I experienced was profound morning/afternoon/evening
sickness. Yes I put on weight, but I did for subsequent pregnancies
too. The only way you'll know is with an ultrasound, they can see two
sacks, embryos etc.
As far as heredity goes, I think they don't really know how it
influences the production of twins. In my case, there are twins on
both sides of the family. My first cousin, via my mother's side, has
twins. My father's mother came from a family with twins. My husbands
mother came from a family with twins. It is remarkable, but usually if
you ask your parents about their families you will find twins, often
though in those days either one or both of a set of twins died. So
actual records of families are more accurate than memories of family
members.
Twins run 1 per 85 pregnancies I think. The risks are highest in your
early child bearing years (teens), and late child bearing years
(mid/late 30s).
My twins are 5 years old now, but I still remember the pregnancy like
it was yesterday.
|
311.2 | | TCC::HEFFEL | Sushido - The way of the tuna | Wed Sep 05 1990 11:06 | 20 |
| Acutally, they *do* know (at least to some extent) how heredity affects
twins.
The father's side of the family has nothing to do with it.
If your (the mother's) side has fraternal twins, you have a much higher
chance of having twins.
If your (the mother's) side has identical twins, (barring the use of
fertility drugs) you have exactly the same chance of having twins as someone
who doesn't have twins in their family. (As mentioned, about 1/80.) (Of course,
that varies with age. The older you are, the higher chance you have of having
twins.)
Tracey
Who was thrilled to hear that the "paternal heritage" doesn't come into play
after she heard that her paternal great-grandmother had 21(!) children among
them 3 (!!) sets of twins and a set of triplets!!!!!!!!
|
311.3 | My OB says...:-) | HYSTER::DELISLE | | Wed Sep 05 1990 12:08 | 15 |
| re .2 -
It is my understanding, from my OB, doctors do not KNOW if the paternal
side has any influence on the incidence of twins. It would seem
logical that the father would not be influential in fraternal twins,
because it's the mother's two eggs being fertilized that results in
that. But as for identical twins, I think that is still an unknown
quantity. They don't know what makes the fertilized egg plit into two
identical embryos.
On the other hand, it is possible to inherit "female" traits from one's
father - like incidence of breast cancer, etc. So why couldn't
twinning be carried down from my father's side of the family, as well
as my mother's? I think it is still not known.
|
311.4 | Parenting mag article | NUGGET::BRADSHAW | | Wed Sep 05 1990 12:46 | 10 |
| I think Tracey read the same article in Parenting that I did. (the
August 1990 issue, I think) It was all about twins and as Tracey said,
the article clearly stated that the only proven heriditary (sp??)
infuence is from the mother and only with fraternal twins.
For what it's worth, my stomach "popped" early with my two pregnancies
(I was big early). Both were/are single babies.
Good luck and congrats either way!
Sandy
|
311.5 | | TCC::HEFFEL | Sushido - The way of the tuna | Wed Sep 05 1990 16:58 | 4 |
| Yup. It was the Parenting Article. (I think it was Sept however.)
It was in the "As they grow - Prenancy to Birth" column.
Tracey
|
311.6 | y | EXIT26::WILSON | | Fri Sep 07 1990 17:22 | 22 |
| I am about 25 weeks pregnant myself and wondered the same thoughts.
My belly popped out real soon and I felt and looked bigger then the
other women in my group who are due around the same time I am. Twins
run in my family so I mentioned it to my ob when I went for my first
few prenatal visits. After having two ultrasounds for other reasons
only one baby could be seen. But I must say to this day I still
wonder...my belly button popped out about a month ago and I am larger
then the other women. I seem to be all out front. You may just be
going to carry all out front like myself. Every woman is different
and carry differently. We have four women in my group that are all
pregnant at the same time. So we have the opportunity to compare
stories and bellys.
Having an ultrasound will help answer your questions. You could be
farther along then your ob has determined, you just might carry
all out front or you could be having TWINS! Make sure you bring
your husband to the ultrasound...it is a wonderful experience!
Good luck and keep us posted!
Suzanne
|
311.7 | I'm going Wednesday morning.... | RANGER::PELHAM | Hey, don't I know you? | Mon Sep 10 1990 09:46 | 7 |
| I have an Ultrasound scheduled for this Wednesday morning....It may be
too soon to tell if Twins (according to the doctor, I'm only in my 9th
week) but then again I could be further along than I think (which is
what I think). We'll see soon enough. BTW, my husband is coming with
me.
:^) Mel
|
311.8 | It's a 'them'!!! | CURIE::ALLAN | | Mon Sep 10 1990 18:33 | 21 |
| Hi, My twins are seven years old now and they are identical. We have
identical twins on both sides of the family, for what it's worth.
Anyway, I remember the first couple of months that I was pregos I
couldn't get enough sleep. I was tired all of the time. I didn't
get much bigger then anyone else would (infact it was hard to tell
I was even prego till I was about 7 months along and then wham-o I
was all stomach.) I remeber when I was about two months along when
I started to get the feeling that it wasn't an 'it' but a 'them' and
everyone just brushed it off like ya right, sure...
Well, when I was 4 months along I went in for an ultrasound and was
told by the doctor that, 'it' was doing just fine, but.... there were
two of them!
I think every pregnency is different and you really can't be sure
until you have an ultrasound or until your ob picks up two heart-beats.
I would image even if you are only 9 weeks along, that they would still
be able to tell if it were two seperate bodies in there...
Good luck and please let us know if it's an 'it' or a 'them'!!!
|
311.9 | Two heartbeats | HYSTER::DELISLE | | Wed Sep 12 1990 10:24 | 10 |
| My twins were diagnosed when I was ten weeks pregnant, via ultrasound.
So it is quite possible to determine twins at this early stage.
As for the two heartbeats. My OB pointed something out to me - to
detect twins via the heartbeat route, your OB would have to have two of
those microphones they use, get a fix one one heartbeat with one of
them, hold onto it, then hone in on the other heartbeat with the other
one, and hold onto that one. Not an easy task. That's why more often
these days twins are picked up by ultrasounds. Far more accurate.
|
311.10 | I saw the heart beating..... | RANGER::PELHAM | Life NEVER ends, it just changes | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:05 | 15 |
| Well, I went for my ultrasound this morning! I saw clearly ONE baby
(and it's little heart beating a mile a minute!), but there was
something right next to the baby (in my uteris), they said it was the
"yolk sac"? I didn't even know there was such a thing, but it was a
tiny bit smaller than half the size of the baby. I couldn't see any
heart beating in what they called the yolk sac, so I'm assuming it's
just one baby!
It's either that, or maybe there IS two and one just couldn't be seen
today??!! I went for the ultrasound to find out the size and date of
my baby. However, I won't have the results until I go for my next
Doctor appointment. The baby measured 1.5"! What a little person for
causing me to be SOOOOOOOO sick!
Mel :^)
|
311.11 | Twins confirmed at 4 weeks! | MAMOTH::COX_PA | | Thu Sep 13 1990 14:39 | 3 |
| My twins were seen on an ultrasound when I was just 4 weeks pregnant.
Multiples were suspected with my original pregnancy test because
it had such a high reading.
|
311.12 | Ghost Twin Pregnancies | NRADM::TRIPPL | | Mon Sep 17 1990 15:08 | 18 |
| I'm adding sort of vague information, hoping that is might explain
your "yolk" term. I read last year that many "Twin" pregnancies still
only produce one baby. The "Yolk" you see may have been a second
fertilization, however it didn't go beyond that. Before the birth of
the one you're sure of, the second will be absorbed by the body, seems
to me it's through the liver. I recall the term "ghost" pregnacy being
associated with this. Might ask your OB to define what exactly this yolk
is, it is in no way related to a blighted ovum though, this is
something that comes from fraternal (two egg) , not identical (one egg
which spits) pregnacies.
BTW, the new vaginal method of ultrasound can be done at 7 weeks, and
can show both heartbeats. Thankfully with this you don't need the
uncomfortable full bladder to have this type either!
Don't worry, everything will be just fine!
Lyn
|
311.13 | Phantom Twin | HYSTER::DELISLE | | Tue Sep 18 1990 14:06 | 16 |
| In regards to .12 - I've heard it referred to as a "phantom twin". It
happens when there are indeed two fertilized eggs developing into
embryos, but for unknown reasons one of them dies, early in the
pregnancy often, and the embryo is absorbed back into the body.
This happened to my sister'in-law. She was diagnosed with twins at
about 12 weeks, via ultrasound. Excited! I should say so. About a
week later she started experienceing some heavy bleeding, and was put
on bedrest. For about four weeks she wasw told to rest completely.
The bleeding stopped and she was fine. She went about four months with
no problems, assuming she was still carrying twins, but when she went
in for another ultrasound in her eighth month, they discovered only one
remained. She had lost the other.
It's amazing what the body can do.
|
311.14 | There really is a yolk sac | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Tue Sep 18 1990 23:12 | 17 |
| From _A Child is Born_ (the Lennart Nilsson classic), in the section
on the second week of fetal development:
Once shelter and nourishment have been established, the "human
seed" begins to grow in earnest. Over its two-layered disk
another cavity develops, which will become the amniotic sac.
... The lower layer begins to change into a primitive intestine
with a funny protuberance, the yolk sac, similar to that of a
fish embryo. ...
And in the caption to a four-week picture:
The yolk sac is seen to the left of the body. In human beings
it serves only as a blood-cell factory and does not contain any
reserve nourishment.
-Neil
|
311.15 | weird facts | WMOIS::B_REINKE | We won't play your silly game | Tue Sep 18 1990 23:19 | 7 |
| There has been one case, btw, where a young man, when he entered
puberty, started having chest pains. When he had a chest xray it
was found that the embryo of what would have been his fraternal
twin had been absorbd into his lung and the hormones of puberty
had started the embryo growing again.
Bonnie
|
311.16 | | GENRAL::M_BANKS | | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:49 | 11 |
| > There has been one case, btw, where a young man, when he entered
> puberty, started having chest pains. When he had a chest xray it
> was found that the embryo of what would have been his fraternal
> twin had been absorbd into his lung and the hormones of puberty
> had started the embryo growing again.
Do you know what happened? VERY weird!
Marty
|
311.17 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | We won't play your silly game | Thu Sep 20 1990 14:35 | 5 |
| The embryo was surgically removed. Every so often this turns up as a
feature article in one of the tabloids. It actually happened years ago
in Japan. I read about it in my embryology class in college.
Bonnie
|
311.18 | Here's the definition...... | RANGER::PELHAM | Life NEVER ends, it just changes | Mon Sep 24 1990 09:29 | 13 |
| I checked with a friend of mine who is a nurse in maternity, and she
told me that the "yolk sac" is a sac that provides nourishment for the
embryo, it eventually decinergrates (sp?) and whats left of it forms
into the ambilical (sp?) cord later on. (I'm not familiar with the
spelling of most of these terms)
She looked it up in one of her embryo & fetal fertilization books and read
the definition to me.
Mel :^)
She also said it looks round. (which I thought it looked like the head
of another baby!)
|
311.19 | | CUPMK::TAKAHASHI | | Tue Oct 02 1990 16:01 | 19 |
| Hi Mel. It's me. I finally got into this note. Anyway, I knew I was
pregnant 2 days after conception because my breasts swelled and were in
major pain, and I was and I was having the ligament stretching also
from as early as 2 days after conception. I happen to only have
weighed 103 pounds when I conceived, so I figure that because I'm
small, everything is more noticeable.
As you know, I am now about to start my 13th week. I also popped out
early, but as I told you earlier, my doctor said that bowel distension
is very common in early pregnancy (he saw me at 8 weeks) and said that
it would be very rare to be showing at that point from the uterus
because the uterus is behind the bowels and doesn't move forward until
3 or 3 1/2 months. I now have a different kind of belly than I had at
8 weeks. It looks like a little "o" now, whereas it used to look
really swollen.
HOpe you survived Florida without too much morning sickness.
Nancy
|