T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
265.1 | | RANGER::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Fri Aug 17 1990 13:41 | 29 |
| Hooo boy. Barbara, you are certainly more brave than I. I'm not
sure I would have started a topic like this... :-)
Anyway, no answers, just suggestions...
o Both partners of the couple should be involved in the decision if
at all possible. This will certainly avoid hard feelings later.
o You may want to use the "Ben Franklin Close" to help your
decision process. That is, make a 2-column list, one side is all
the reasons to go back, the other side is all the reasons to stay
home. This will give you a good idea of what you're up against,
and will also force you to verbalize all the things you are
feeling/thinking about this stuff.
o Be aware that, as you surely know, many of the responses you will
get are based on U.S. culture and society. These may or may not
be applicable in the U.K.
o Above all, do what is right for YOUR FAMILY. While most people
mean well when giving advise, they are probably not prepared to
pay your bills or care for your family. This is a decision that
must be YOURS, not ours or friends or extended family or anybody
else, really.
Peace,
- Tom
|
265.2 | ONly you know | TOOK::CURRIER | | Fri Aug 17 1990 13:57 | 15 |
| You wont know how you feel about staying home with your baby until you
have stayed home with your baby. Try to give yourself a long enough
maternity leave to allow yourself flexibility re the final decision. I
know people who planned to go back to work after 2 months because they
KNEW that they could never stay home with a baby and remain sane.
They haven't worked for years. Others who planned to be earth mother
returned to work after several months.
Most people have no choice for financial reasons. If you have to
return to work, I think that you should try to stay home for as long as
you can - 6 months anyway. Then return to work part time - like 3 days
a week - every other day. You can't imagine the logistics involved in
getting an infant off in the morning. Getting home at night is almost
as bad.
|
265.3 | Returning to work | JURAN::QAR_TEMP | | Fri Aug 17 1990 13:59 | 20 |
| Barbara,
Thats your decision you WILL make after your baby is born. I think
everyones opinions will be a little differant. When I had Joey in
7/12/89 I was so glad not to be working and home with my son. My
husband wanted me to take off 6 mo. to a 12 mo.. Well, eventually
I went back to work when Joey was 4 mo. My friends mom takes care
of him full-time. When I went back to work I missed him so much,
I called everyday for the first 2 weeks, went to visit him during
my lunch, etc. Then a few months past. I am a contract so I was
out of work for a few weeks. But it was so differant I felt like
I WANTED TO go back to work, It's like you need that break. My
husband would come home and You just about talke all baby talke
during the day that you need to be with adults as well. I do
miss hime a lot during the day, Come time for weekends and Weeknights
I am so happy to spend all my time with him and my husband. But
by sunday night can't wait to go back to work for Monday!
-Nadine
|
265.4 | | BUSY::DKHAN | | Fri Aug 17 1990 14:21 | 19 |
| I am the total opposite of Nadine in .3. I had 2 kids in 2 years
and I really wanted to stay home with both, but could not for financial
reasons. Now I think I would like to work part time. For me it would
be ideal as I would have more time with the kids, and a bit of time
with my peers so I wouldn't go bonkers. But, if I couldn't find
part-time work, I would stay home in a heartbeat! I'd start projects
to keep me from getting down. Or if I had a neighbor with kids,
I'd swap off a few days a month so I could go out occasionally.
Now that we are relocating to PA there is a good chance I will get
to do that...probably work part time.
Good luck with your decision. But I think it's a hard one to make
before the baby is born. I know a few people who wanted to go to
work after, and changed their minds abruptly upon the birth of the
baby.
Dot
|
265.5 | a word form dad... | CRONIC::ORTH | | Fri Aug 17 1990 14:34 | 66 |
| Would you accept a reply from a dad? My wife is a full-time mom. It was
a mutual decision, which by the way, I wholeheartedly think is the best
way to make this decision. Any dissension on this between mom and dad
needs to be ironed out very smoothly, or when troubles come down the
pike (and they will, no matter which way you decide), there will be
great tension between mom and dad. This benefits no one. (by way of
explanation, about what I mean by "trouble": 1) stay-at-home mom --
"I need some cooperation around here!...I need some adult time and some
alone time!" Well, *You're* the one who wanted to stay home....., or 2)
working mom --- "I need some cooperation around here!...I can't be
expected to do *2* full time jobs...mothering and an outside job! Well,
*you're* the one who wanted to go back to work....) For us, it was an
"easy" choice...we both agreed to make the financial sacrifices that go
with only one income in Massachusetts :-(, and we both agreed that it
would be mom's "career" to raise the kids. She did work for one
marathon day a week (12 hours) from when our youngest was 1 til our 2nd
was 4 mos...then we moved to massachusetts and she did not go back to
an outside job. We have the advantage that she can work outside for a
very small # of hours, if we both diecide on this...she is an
Occupational Therapist, and can get well-paid consulting work, almost
anytime she wants for about 10-12 hours per *month* (well-paid=$30-$40 an
hour). We choose not to. Three kids, the oldest just turning five next
week, is a full-time job in and of itself.
But....I would fiercely defend any woman's right to make that
choice! You *MUST* do what is best for you, your husband, your family.
May I offer a piece of advice? Whatever you decide, *don't* burn your
bridges behind you!!! You may decide you are absolutely positive you
never want to work again...and then find you can't stand being home
full-time. If you've out and out quit, you can't go back. The reverse
is a little easier, but don't make irreversible committments. If you
carve it in stone that you'll go back in 6 months, and simply can't
live with that, you'll feel miserable. You'll either compromise what
you need and want (and loathe it), or renege on your agreement to go
back, which leaves many hard feelings. Leave those options open!
An observation my wife has made over the years, which strikes me as
having great validity. Here in the US, it is "standard" to have 6 weeks
maternity leave (although many women opt for and extended leave). When
you are nearing the end of your pregnancy, 6 weeks might as well be 6
decades! It seems like *such* a long time...because your perspective on
time right now is in the context of waiting for that due date...and
that makes time move soooooo slowly. 6 weeks seems an eternity, and you
may feel sure that you'll be ready to go back in 6 weeks. But...the 6
weeks after birth go by in the blink of an eye. it's barely time to get
hormonal levels back to a semi-normal state. You're jsut beginning to
feel like a competent parent, you're just beginning to get over the
profound tiredness that accompanies birth/first few weeks...and you're
just beginning to really fall in love with that beautiful baby! And
then, bam, its time to leave it for 8 hours a day. I've observed this
is too much for most women *at this time*. Give it longer than 6 weeks
(a *lot* longer, IMO).
The idea of a pro and con list is excellent...I would suggest that you
and your hubby do one individually, and then compare them. You may be
surprised at the differences, and may point up potential weak spots to
work on, whichever option you choose.
We feel that a parent is best able to nurture, love, and instill in
their child the values that they esteem. We feel that, particularly in
the area of teaching a child right from wrong, how to behave, and what
your value system is and *why*, no one can do a better job than you
can, and the first few years of their lives are the most crucial ones
ever for this. Just our opinion.....no slams, judgements, etc.
intended! If you're comfortable with what you choose, then you're child
will likely grow up very well adjusted, loved...in short...just fine!
Good luck with a tough decision!
--dave--
|
265.6 | To each his/her own | ELMAGO::PHUNTLEY | | Fri Aug 17 1990 14:36 | 36 |
| Barbara,
Such a difficult decision. I had planned even before my pregnacy
to return to work soon after the baby was born. I was initially
intending to take the maximum time that Digital would allow but
because I went on maternity leave early, our financial situation
prompted my return a little sooner. After being on leave for about
six months (the baby was 3 months old) I was more than READY to
return to work. Not that I don't love my son dearly but I really
missed being a "professional". Yes, I liked being a mommy, too
but was ready to return to making decisions other than formula,
diaper, sleep, etc. I also missed the adult conversation. Also,
no matter what anyone says, IMHO, newborns are pretty boring little
people. I could never even think that of my now 14 month old son-he
keeps me fascinated for hours. I said when I first came back to
work that I wished you could come back immediately following the
birth and then take your parental leave when the baby was about
6 months old. Oh, what I would have given to take six months off
around my son's first birthday!! Financial considerations were
a big factor in our house. We had even talked of my husband being
a "househusband" as I'm the primary income source but decided neither
one of us were cut out to stay home. Our initial daycare situation
did not work out well at all and it made working a very uncomfortable
situation. When Josh was 5 months old we found the "right" care
for us, and it has made a world of difference just knowing we can
go to work and not worry about our son.
Good luck in your decision, and really try to consider all of your
options and resources before committing yourself to a hard and fast
decision. I kept in very close contact with my manager while I
was on leave and let him know exactly what was going on so that
he knew what to expect, which also helped my transition back into
work easier.
Pam
|
265.7 | | STAR::MACKAY | C'est la vie! | Fri Aug 17 1990 15:35 | 31 |
|
re.0
I have a 5 yr old and am expecting the second in 5 weeks.
I am an engineer at DEC and I enjoy my work. I work for my
own sanity! Money is not an issue, we can always make do with less.
We don't have a lot of friends or relatives that stay home.
My husband and I both agree that it was better off for my daughter
to be in daycare (to be with other kids).
I took off 3 months with my daughter, I was going up the walls
towards the end. Things didn't get done around the house, I lost my
motivation, I lost track of time, I felt isolated, I felt trapped.
Going back to work was a relief.
I am going to take off similar amount of time this time around.
Good reliable daycare is essential. We have been very lucky so
far.
Life can be hectic when both parents work. But I "perform"
much better under little bit of pressure and I am good at doing
a lot of things in parallel. I can have laundry going, tomato sauce
simmering, meat marinating lawn mowing and keeping an eye on my
duaughter at the same time.
So, it depends on your personality, you and your husband's belief's,
your child, your career goal, etc. Everyone is different.
Do what is right for you.
Eva.
|
265.8 | Be prepared to change you mind | MARX::FLEURY | | Fri Aug 17 1990 17:51 | 25 |
|
Before I had my baby, I considered myself to be a seasoned
professional who could never survive as a full-time stay-at-home
mom. I would always have a career.
After my baby was born, I thought I could spend every waking hour
for the rest of my life just playing with this wonderful person.
I could have 6, 7, even 8 children if they were all as wonderful
as this one. I would love to be a full-time stay-at-home mother.
Who needs a career anyway?
After 3 months at home with my baby, I thought I would land
in a loony farm if I didn't get to do something besides change
diapers, sing lullabies, and clean the house. I missed my job.
My first day back at work I cried on and off all day. I missed
my baby (who was four months old). And I felt like a terrible
mother for leaving her with a perfect stranger who I had only
spoken to a half dozen times during interviews.
I have been back at work part time for two weeks now - and I
*think* working 3 days a week is the right choice for me. At
least, it's the right choice for me today.
|
265.9 | Be prepared to *keep* changing your mind. | IOSG::CORMAN | | Sun Aug 19 1990 07:59 | 16 |
| I returned to full time work when my daughter was four months
old. I felt all the ambivalence expressed throughout these
notes, and still do after eight months, but know I've made
the right choices -- Sarah is flourishing with the stimulation
of other children in daycare and one more loving adult (her childminder)
and I'm happy to have the chance to go to work and relax.
(childcare is harder work than work!)
But, I know I'll continue to be of two minds, always, because
this is a compromise solution. It must be the rare parent
that is 100% contented with her/his daily arrangement,
because that arrangement *always* contains hard work, juggling,
and flexibility.
Best of luck with your many, ongoing, decisions --
Barbara
|
265.10 | Wait to commit | MAJORS::MANDALINCI | | Mon Aug 20 1990 05:26 | 26 |
| The one thing I did wrong about making a decision about when I would
return to work (I knew I could not stay at home all the time) was that
I committed to my manager prior to even having the baby. Knowing I
didn't want to stay home full-time and for financial reasons, I did
needed to return to work but my commitment was that I would come back 6
weeks after the due date. In retropsect I wish I didn't make any
commitment that I actually felt aweful going back on. Consequently, I
think I went back to early, especially with my first. But, I survived
it emotionally.
I'm pregnant with my second now and I am really making no absolute
commitment but, again, financially I will need to go back ASAP. We work
in England and still support our original life in the States as well -
we cannot afford even a week extra off at this time. Who knows what the
next 5 months will hold so I am not making any firm commitments unless
it will whole-heartedly be a missed career opportunity or a desperate
financial requirement and I'm not making them until I get close to the
end.
I think we each weigh our financial, emotional and career requirements
based on the exact situation at that time. Each variable is weighted
according to our own priorities and you should really listen to your
own "heart" when making any decision.
Good luck in arriving at your decision. It isn't easy.
Andrea
|
265.11 | thanks for the replies | ODDONE::SANWELL | | Mon Aug 20 1990 06:36 | 20 |
| Thanks for all your replies so far. One other possibility I had
thought about which would enable me to stay at home and earn some money
was to take the child minding course, get my certificate and then if I
am at home with one, I might as well look after another 2 as well and
get paid. One thing I did forget to mention is that I don't qualify
for maternity leave with Digital, so I only have to give them a leaving
date. I was thinking of 'temping' if I do decide that I want to go
back to work.
At the moment in my heart of hearts I would like to be a full time mom,
however, your replies echo the advice I have been given by others eg.
by 3-6 months I couldn't wait to go back to work. I know this decision
is one that I am not going to make until after the baby is born, but it
is nice to hear other peoples views before hand.
Barbara
ps. My husbands input.... 'You do whatever you feel happiest doing'.
.... 'I'll support you whatever you decide'.
|
265.12 | My $.02 | LOOKUP::NELSONK | | Mon Aug 20 1990 10:18 | 66 |
| If I don't work, we don't have medical insurance. We really need
my income and my medical/dental benefits. So I am working out of
necessity.
I took 2 weeks off before James was born, and had 8 weeks after
because he was a cesarean delivery. Then I took off an additional
four weeks -- but the first week, I went to work one day, then
two days the week after that, three days the next weeek, and full
time the last week of the month. This was my cost center manager's
idea, and I will always be grateful to her for her sensitivity. It
made the transition so much easier! -- By this time, James was three
months old, he was sleeping through the night and taking two decent
naps a day (occasionally a third one when he got home from day care!).
My neighbor takes care of him, and so far we've been pretty darn
lucky -- I've woofed about Elaine in this file, but essentially,
she's very good with James and we consider ourselves pretty lucky
to have her for a caregiver. I drop James off in the morning, Mike
picks him up in the afternoon at 4:30. If he can't make it, I leave
work early, one of his nieces picks the baby up, or I arrange for
a neighbor to do so.
The point of all this rambling is, if you are going to go back to
work, you have to have reliable day care and reliable back-up people.
Plus your spouse/SO has to back you up in your decision. This means,
whoever gets home first picks up the baby, starts dinner, folds
laundry, etc. Some couples find it easiest to make up a list of the
chores that need to be done every week and split the list between
them, according to each one's interests/abilities. Mike hates to
do dishes, for example, so that's my job. But he gets home from
work an hour before I do, so he starts dinner. You see my point.
Benefits of working outside the home can include (this is not a
complete list):
o More money
o Personal autonomy
o Health benefits (where this applies)
o CHild gets the opportunity to be with other children/adults in
day care -- some kids socialize better because of this
o Occasionally results in better relationship between couple --
worries about $$, for example, often lessen.
Disadvantages include tiredness, feeling cheated because you feel like
you never spend enough time with spouse/SO and kids, feeling like there
isn't enough time in the day for yourself, for housework, etc.
Occasionally, because there is extra money coming in, you find
yourselves spending it on takeout meals because you're too damn tired
to cook!!
Again, .0, this is a decision only you and your spouse can make. I now
feel a lot better about working full-time outside the home. I feel
that I'm helping my husband provide for our family, and that makes me
feel like I'm holding up my end of the marriage bargain. Because I
work, we have medical and dental insurance, so I don't need to worry
(not to much anyway! :-)) if one of us gets sick, God forbid. My son
is in a caring day care environment, and between us and Elaine, he's
turning into a pretty nice little boy. My salary doesn't mean that
we hav everything we want. I like to think, however, that it means
that we have everything we need.
God bless you as you wrestle with this very difficult decision.
Kate
|
265.13 | my experience | SCAACT::COX | Kristen Cox - Dallas ACT Sys Mgr | Mon Aug 20 1990 10:48 | 19 |
|
I have felt what most of the previous replies have said. I too could never
picture myself a full-time mom, and I confirmed that on my maternity leave.
I was climbing the walls and going stir crazy - I wanted to be depended on
for more than diapers, runny nose, cuddling, etc., I really needed a mental
challenge.
HOWEVER.... Kati's first several days in daycare were very difficult. The
day I walked in with Kati and walked out with empty arms (first time in 8
weeks) was just awful. But now after seeing all of the activities they have
for her, I know that I am just not cut from that mold - I could never dream
up all of the creative things they do that both entertain and teach her. It
really takes a special aptitude for that, and much more patience than I have.
Although I know I made the right decision for myself, I still have a hard time
going to malls for lunch. Every time I see a mom (or sometimes dads) strolling
around her little one, I long for mine too.
Kristen
|
265.14 | | TSGDEV::CHANG | | Mon Aug 20 1990 11:23 | 20 |
| I went back to work right after Eric was born (only took 6 weeks
of maternity leave). I did it not because we needed money, but for
myself. I just cann't be a full-time mom. Plus, my mother-in-law
was here taking care of Eric. Therefore, going back to work
was a break for me, I felt really comfortable leaving Eric home.
Then, things changed. When Eric was 4 months old, my mother-in-law
left. I had to start Eric at daycare. Boy, it was hard. I felt
guilty all day, couldn't concentrate on my work at all. This
feeling finally went away by finding the right caregiver for Eric.
I am expecting my second in 6 weeks. This time we won't have any
relatives to help us out. I have decided to take at least 3 months
off, and will not come back to work until I find the right care
for baby.
I do like my job, but unless I found quality care for my children,
I don't think I will enjoy my job and probably will not perform
well on my job either.
Wendy
|
265.15 | | MAMTS3::MWANNEMACHER | let us pray to Him | Mon Aug 20 1990 12:59 | 19 |
| Another husband heard from :')- My wife is a stay at home mom. She had
worked all of her adult life, and was a "professional" (that word
bothers me for some reason-maybe because it's overused). When we had
Genna (our first) she was unable to stay at home for financial reasons.
After Lauren (#2) she quit work. It has been basically a positive
experience for her and our family. Things aren't nearly as hectic on
the home front, which gives us more time for family building as opposed
to keeping the house together.
My wife has taken up some volunteer work so as she can get some adult
involvement as this is something that is definitely needed. It's
worked well for us, but as everyone has pointed out, you have to do
what is best for your family.
One more thing: In this notes conference, you are not getting the
feedback from the moms who are at home now, so you may not be getting
all the information you need.
Mike
|
265.16 | | KC::TERRY | | Mon Aug 20 1990 21:52 | 22 |
| I also agree with many of the previous noters - it's hard to make this decision
until after the baby is born.
I returned to work, part-time, when Cory was 5 1/2 months old. Now, 5 months
later, I'm still working part-time and both my husband & I are very happy with
my decision.
Cory gets lots of love & attention from his provider, as well as a chance to
interact with lots of other kids.
I get a chance to interact with adults as well as the gratification from my job
(& a paycheck).
I wanted to add a few comments about the transition back to work. It's very
difficult to leave your child the first time. I found that my transition was
made easier by a VERY understanding manager & sympathetic co-workers. My
manager told me that anytime I needed to leave to see the baby - to just go.
While I didn't do that often, just knowing that I could eased my mind !
Good luck with your decision !
- Terry
|
265.17 | personal history | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Tue Aug 21 1990 09:46 | 47 |
| The factors for me were almost entirely personal. Generally the
kids will do fine no matter what you decide; it's most important
that you and your spouse feel comfortable with the decision and
the arrangements. And just because you felt one way with one baby
doesn't mean you'll feel the same after a second or even a third.
When Kat was born in 1973, I was unemployed like almost everybody
else I knew (anybody remember the oil embargo and accompanying
"recession"?) and for strictly economic reasons would have given a
great deal to have had a job to go back to. There were 5 adults
and 2 babies living on my father's one salary at the time...
10 years later I went straight back to work after Steven was born.
I took 6 weeks maternity plus one week vacation, and wished I was
medically ready to go back sooner. Since spouse is also a DECcie,
we were able to arrange a transition period in which I worked at
home 2 days a week and he worked at home one day a week, so Steven
only had to go to the sitter for two days. Gradually I started
working one more day, then Neil dropped his work at home day, and
finally I went back full time. It took about three months, I
suppose, and it eased the transition for all of us.
I came back refreshed despite the new-baby exhaustion, and was
ready to put a big push into my career, which has always meant a
great deal to me. I'm interested in the work I do, and I love the
strong and competent feelings of being able to challenge a
difficult problem, figure out the solution, and carry it through.
But after David was born last fall, I took the full amount of
unpaid maternity leave I was entitled to, and wished I could have
had more. Medically, I could have come back to work about two
days after he was born, but I wasn't interested in it. I tried
tried to hack it full time for a while, but I'm now working 20
hours. It's a big improvement, but I think I would have quit
entirely if it hadn't been for Kat's impending college bills.
It has nothing to do with changed feelings about my career. I
still wish I had the time and the energy for it, and when the kids
are solidly launched, I'll come back to it. But now that I'm
older I realize that everything doesn't have to be done today.
The career I'm involved in will still be there when I'm ready for
to pick it back up. And it wasn't any feeling that the kids were
being hurt by my working. They seemed to be doing fine. *I* was
the one who was hurting, so I took steps to make it easier for
myself. Really not very complicated, after all that explanation.
--bonnie
|
265.18 | Leaving DEC Sept. 12 | FIVE5::MIKKOLA | | Tue Aug 21 1990 17:54 | 26 |
| Well, unlike the advice of many noters, I've made up my mind ahead
of time, and have let my managers know. I'm going to be staying
home when our baby comes. For me, this is something I've longed
to do for a long time, so it wasn't a difficult decision (although
I admit, it was a scarey one!).
A lot of the replies here mentioned the lack of adult interaction.
I won't know until I've been at it for a while, but I'm hoping that
won't be too much of a problem for me. The church we attend has
women's Bible studies during the week, and I plan to attend at least
one. There are also many women I know (several neighbors and several
women in our church) who are full-time moms, and I'm looking forward
to being able to spend more time with them.
I wouldn't be doing this, though, if I didn't have my husbands full
support (as several other noters have mentioned). We spent a lot
of time discussing it. One expectation I've discovered my husband
has is good home-cooked dinners. That seems fair enough - I just
hope I can develop more culinary skills than I have now!! Another
thing we've discussed is that if the budget gets too tight, I will
probably provide day-care for another child. These are things that
I'm glad we've discussed ahead of time, so we both know where we
stand, and have come to agreements on them.
Good luck with your decision and with your baby-2-b!
-Cathy
|
265.19 | support is very important | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Wed Aug 22 1990 10:12 | 21 |
| If you have a support network already there for you, with
activities you'll enjoy and people you already know and like, I
doubt that you'll have too much trouble.
I don't have any family in the area, most of my friends I made
through work, and only one or two of the women in my neighborhood
stay at home even part time. Fortunately they're the mothers of
Steven's best friends, so staying home part time with David has
been easier so far than it would have been when Steven was little.
And until I can find a liberal activist charismatic fundamentalist
church in Nashua, I won't have a church to provide a built-in
social life.
It depends so much on what the mother's individual situation is.
--bonnie
p.s. this is the second or third remark this month where someone
wishing they knew how to cook better or more nutritious meals.
This is something I happen to know how to do -- would anyone be
interested in having me post 'family cooking lessons'???
|
265.20 | Get me OUT of this house! | TCC::HEFFEL | Sushido - The way of the tuna | Wed Aug 22 1990 11:05 | 86 |
| > ELMAGO::PHUNTLEY
> Also,
> no matter what anyone says, IMHO, newborns are pretty boring little
> people. I could never even think that of my now 14 month old son-he
> keeps me fascinated for hours. I said when I first came back to
> work that I wished you could come back immediately following the
> birth and then take your parental leave when the baby was about
> 6 months old.
You've got your wish. I've got the "Orange Book" in front of me.
From page 2 of PPP 4.23:
"Parental - A leave provided to birth and adoptive parents for the
purpose of bonding with new children. Parental leave must be taken
within *6 months* [empahsis mine] of the birth or adoption of the child.
Parental leave is available to any regular emplyee who meets the
requirements of this paragraph."
For me the answer was easy. I knew before hand that I wanted to be
back about as soon as I could be. My manager was great. He offered me
part-time if I wanted, it reminded me of parental leave and so on. I said "no
thanks" to both. He advised me to keep my options open.
What I arranged to do ahead of time was stay out my 6 or 8 weeks
(turned out to be 8, I had a c-section), then come back 1/2 days the first week.
If that went well, I'd move up to 6 hours for a week and then decide if I needed
another week of 6 hours or if I wanted to go back to 8 hours. The time off I
"paid" for with vacation time. So I still got paid for full time work.
I had my baby. Had 8 weeks STD. Went back to work on a Wednesday.
Worked 1/2 days those first three days. Worked 6 hours the next week. The
next week moved up to 8 hours.
I WAS surprised at how much I love Katie and how much I love to be with
her. (I wasn't much of a kid person before.) BUT... I know myself pretty well.
I was dead on right about how stir crazy I would be at the end of the STD. (And
yes, I went to the mall and for walks and had plenty of projects.) (Projects?
Are you kidding!?!?! I had TONS of cross-stitch and knitting and woodworking
and reading stacked up waiting to be done. I am the Quintessential Over-
scheduler. Who has time to do any of significant portion of that while keeping
the house in reasonable order and a newborn clean, fed, dry and cuddled?)
The real surprise was Gary. (To say that Gary was not a kid person
would be like saying that Attila the Hun was impolite. :-) ) (Yes, Katie
was a surprise, entirely welcome now and we wouldn't have it any other way, but
a surprise never the less.) The first week after Katie was born, Gary worked
while my Mom stayed with Katie and I. The next week, mom went home and Gary
stayed home with us. By the end of the week, he was dreading going back. We
talked about it and decided that if we watched our spending and sold a few
shares of stock so that we had an emergency fund in case our furnace blew up
or whatever, that we could afford to have Gary out of work for 3 months.
Gary was the first father where he worked to take a leave of absence to stay
home with his child. His leave started the week I went back to work.
Having Gary out worked VERY well. We could afford the loss of his
salary more than we could mine. Leaving Katie home with Gary was not traumatic
at all. After all, why should it be? He's her Daddy and just as able to take
care of her as I am. Gary's leave made the transition to Daycare easier in two
respects. One, she was older (almost 5 months) when she went. Two, I was
already used to leaving her with someone for the whole day so I didn't have to
deal with "Parental separation anxiety" at the same time that I had to deal
with the issues of working out a smooth arrangement with Daycare. Having Gary
home with Katie gave him (and me) confidence in his ability to take care of
Katie if any should happen to me or even if I should just be out of town for a
few days. He had a chance to struggle with diapers and feeding and bathing
without my looking over his shoulder and kibbitzing (just like I had a chance
while I was on STD). There is now no question of Katie's care being MY job.
(In fact, I'd say that Gary changes about twice as many poopy diapers as I do.)
I also like the messages that this sent Katie. Yes, I know, she was
almost definately not aware enough of what was going on to remember but *maybe*
she picked up a bit and certainly, we can tell her when she is older about Daddy
staying home with her. It's speaks pretty strongly of our committment to
avoid gender stereotyping.
I know that not everyone is in the financial position to have *either*
parent stay home with the baby or to have the male parent (if there is one) stay
home. But for us, it worked marvelously well. I just wanted to remind everyone
to keep that option in mind.
Good Luck with whatever you decide!
Tracey
|
265.21 | Work - the anti-depressant of the future? | TCC::HEFFEL | Sushido - The way of the tuna | Wed Aug 22 1990 11:47 | 18 |
| The paper yesterday had an article about the effects of working for pay
of the mental health of women.
I'll try to remeber to type it in, but in case it gets thrown away
before I get to it (this WILL be the one time, Gary will notice that this is not
today's paper and throw it out... :-) ), I'll summarize (as best as I can
remember).
When women started entering the workforce in large numbers in the early
70's, mental health officials expected the effect of the increased stress to be
greater numbers od women with depression and a higher suicide rate. In fact,
the suicide rate and the number of women with depression has DECREASED. Studies
do in this area show that working for pay for women (especially married women)
is a powerful anti-depressant strong enough to even overcome the stress caused
by the "superwoman syndrome" that many working women experience.
Tracey
|
265.22 | From my wife, a stay at home mom | CSG001::MCOHEN | | Wed Aug 22 1990 22:12 | 61 |
| FWIW...
RE .15 - comment that you are not getting the stay at home mom's
opinion... my wife is currently a stay at home mom with Chelsea
(age 5 1/2 months...Chelsea that is... :-). Paula (wife) was a
"professional" (I know, but for want of a better term..) in the
workforce for 12 yrs (a Marketing Manager at Wang most recently).
I asked for Paula's comments...
First, we decided together that this was the kind of lifestyle change
we could both commit to for "x"/unknown amount of time. Paula was
ready for a career change anyway, was not happy in her job situation,
Wang does not offer part time, Wang was a miserable (for her anyway)
place to go to work every day, etc....so the decision to stay at
home was much easier. ie, she was ready and looking forward to
the change, and honestly, did not have a pleasant alternative.
This is different for many of you, in that you are in a job that
you are truly currently committed to and enjoying.
Support groups have been mentioned....VERY important. Neither Paula
nor I have family here (we live in Nashua, NH, I work in Marlboro
MA). My family is in CT/NY/FLA, Paula is from Arizona and her entire
family lives there). Paula has been attending the Matthew
Thornton/Hitchcock Clinic (our HMO) New Mother's Group. It has
been a godsend for her! She has met other new moms, learned lots
of practical things about everything from breastfeeding to
childproofing the home. Paula has just recently started a play
group in our home and had five other moms come to the house last
Tuesday. In reality, this is not so much for the kids, but for
the moms! Since most of her friends were from the workplace, she
needs and is working at making other friends and so far the mothers
group is working out good for that.
The financials of living on one income is/are ... hmmmmm... intersting,
but we planned for it as best we could and so far so good. Instead
of out to dinner once a week, it's once a month/6 wks and rent
a movie on the weekends, but this is truly okay with us because
we like being home as a family. Probably the fact that we are older
first time parents has something to do with this (Paula is almost
35 and I am GULP almost 40). We've both done our traveling, moving
around, eating out a lot, etc, but I digress...
So, to end the rambling... Paula says it does get tedious, it has
sometimes been difficult to come up with things to do other than
the mall, but she is getting more and more into it and finds her
days are generally pretty full. She is starting to consider maybe
something part time, but isn't sure just what, but is doing some
thinking about it. One of her goals has always been to do freelance
writing, so that is an option. The home front things get taken
care of, so our weekends are free for outtings or veg'ing...generally,
most errands, groceries, dry cleaning are taken care of during the
week by Paula/Chelsea. Makes life more enjoyable for me, I must
admit! Someone also mentioned volunteer work, and Paula is scouting
that out to for the mental stimulation/adult involvement.
As most everyone has said, it is a VERY personal decision...don't
make any firm commitments till after the baby and you've been home
a while if you can help it..
Mark, Paula, and Chelsea-the-amazing-baby-of-Nashua, NH
|
265.23 | cook it | CIVIC::JANEB | NHAS-IS Project Management | Thu Aug 23 1990 10:36 | 12 |
| >TLE::RANDALL "living on another planet" 21 lines 22-AUG-1990 09:12
> p.s. this is the second or third remark this month where someone
> wishing they knew how to cook better or more nutritious meals.
> This is something I happen to know how to do -- would anyone be
> interested in having me post 'family cooking lessons'???
YES! Great new topic! Do it!
Thanks,
Jane
|
265.24 | | PHAROS::PATTON | | Thu Aug 23 1990 14:05 | 7 |
| Bonnie,
Yes! I'd love to read "family cooking lessons", especially if you
can include some meatless meals. Thanks for volunteering.
Lucy
|
265.25 | ok | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Thu Aug 23 1990 14:35 | 5 |
| Okay, the next time I'm playing with my cookbooks, I'll start
writing things down . . . anybody else is, of course, welcome to
contribute, too.
--bonnie
|
265.26 | | TCC::HEFFEL | Sushido - The way of the tuna | Fri Aug 24 1990 11:53 | 57 |
| Wow! I actually remembered to type this in!
Tracey
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Study: Paid Work Fights Depression
-- Especially for Married Women
In the 1970's, when women began entering the work force in droves, many
experts warned that the increased stress in their lives would boost women's
already high incidence of depression. One leading sociologist even predicted
that in a few years, women's suicide rates would jump as high as men's.
That hasn't happened. In fact, the latest research indicates that the
opposite is true: paid employment seems to be a powerful antidote against
depression in women, especially married women.
While a number of studies have found this effect, the most persuasive
evidence comes from a study of depression in 700 disables and married men and
women.
The two Canadian authors of this study say their population of
physically disabled people actually yields a more unbiased sample with regard
to the employment than the general population would. That's because it
includes a substantial number of people whose unemployment is socially
sanctioned (due to their disabilities) and personally chosen -- unlike many
women in the general population who can't find a job or have to stay home to
take care of children. As a result, the stress of unemployment is minimized in
the disabled group ad the significance of work in alleviating stress can be
more accurately estimated.
It is less clear why work has this effect.
"Some people have hypothesized that women are taken more seriously at
work and not devalued as much as they are at home," Turner says. "These are
good hypotheses, but we don't really know why work has such a positive effect
on women."
Paid employment. of course also is a powerful buffer against depression
in men: Turner found that unemployed men in his study showed higher levels of
depression than any of the women, working or not. But perhaps because men's
self-esteem is so tied up in how well they perform on the job, work and
work-related problems are more likely to be a cause of depression in men that
in women.
Work problems and related financial difficulties are a central theme
not only in many male suicides, also in suicide-homicide cases. Many men also
use work to avoid dealing with personal problems.
"You'll see men working longer hours when they're having problems,"
says Dr. Ronald Ebert, senior forensic psychiatrist at McLean Hospital. "Work
and sports are used to avoid feeling; the idea is that you keep busy,you don't
have to feel.
|
265.27 | my not-so-humble opinion | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Fri Aug 24 1990 16:31 | 8 |
| re: It is less clear why work has this effect.
Because you don't feel like a mooch on your hard-working husband.
If it was just the being taken seriously, volunteer work would be
just as effective, and it's generally not.
--bonnie
|
265.28 | | TCC::HEFFEL | Sushido - The way of the tuna | Fri Aug 24 1990 17:04 | 9 |
| Oh, I don't know, I've heard lots of people refer to volunteer
work as so-and-so's "little project" as if running a volunteer organization
weren't just as hard as running a business organization. (Harder in fact,
since must do all your influencing without the leverage of holding someone's
livelihood over their head... :-) ).
But I agree with you, the non-mooch factor is definately present.
Tracey
|
265.29 | | CSC32::WILCOX | Back in the High Life, Again | Sun Aug 26 1990 13:26 | 4 |
| Bonnie, instead of throwing recipie ideas in here how about if I adopt
you and you come to my house to cook? Pretty please?
Liz :-).
|
265.30 | I can't decide either | INFACT::HILGENBERG | | Fri Oct 12 1990 15:22 | 49 |
| I am currently at home with my first child, Michelle, who is 3.5 months old.
I am scheduled to return to work full-time January 2, 1991. My boss says if I
don't return at that time, I will have to resign.
I am very much enjoying being at home. At first, even though I was physically
exhausted, emotionally stirred up (from extreme highs to sadness), losing my
memory, and in general totally messed up, I remember thinking, gosh this is
great, everyone should take at least 6 weeks off work. I was feeling pretty
burned out at my job (I'm a senior software specialist with 10 years
experience) so I needed the break.
Having had 10 years at my career makes it easy for me to justify being home.
So I don't feel like a mooch *at all*. Plus I'm up at the crack of dawn, (and
a lot of times even earlier than that, not to mention the middle-of-the-night
rousings) take care of her all day until 6 or 6:30, do my husband's shirts
(used to take them to cleaners), clean the house (used to have a maid), cook
more (used to eat out more), clip coupons (never did this before) and do
everything else pretty much that I used do to before (like pay the bills).
I had no idea though before I had Michelle that I would want to stay at home
and take care of her *as much as I do now*. I mainly wanted the six months
off to help me decide what to do. My husband, Bob, also said "Honey, you do
whatever you feel comfortable with" before she was born, but it's funny how
you start to talk about more specific issues once the baby is born. For
example, we decided since now there's a real possibility I may not return to
work, we're going to start purposely living on one income. We don't have to
have my income, but there's no doubt it will be missed. So that's why we've
given up the maid, etc.
I can't help feeling that I am the best person (along with my husband too of
course) to take care of my daughter. Yes I am starting to feel a little
isolated now though. I have no family here and the few moms I know work full
time. So now I've got to work on this problem. I know there's a solution
besides going back to work full-time myself. I'm considering working at home
a few hours a week just so I can keep my ties with Digital (my fellow
employees here and this notes conference!). And I've got to find things for
us (Michelle and I) to do like play groups, mother's day out, etc. I think
that's my 'job' or 'career' now.
Someone mentioned being scared. The week before my maternity disability
started, I felt scared. I felt like all my friends and coworkers were going
to forget about me. That was not the case. We have all kept in contact. But
now I'm starting to get that scared feeling again if I have to resign. That's
partly why I'm considering the part time work.
This is so far the hardest thing I've ever had to in my life. But I'm sure
things will work out fine with help from my husband, family, and my DEC friends.
Kyra
|
265.31 | Where do you live? | CSG002::MCOHEN | | Sun Oct 28 1990 19:36 | 35 |
| Kyra,
Where are you located? This could have been written by my wife,
Paula. She is at home with our first child, Chelsea, who is now
almost 8 months old. She had spent approx 12 years in high tech
in various marketing management positions.,(Paula not Chelsea)
I told Paula what you said about giving up the maid (we too have
done this), doing husband's shirts (ditto), clipping coupons (Paula
called me the other day VERY exicited at saving $12 dollars on our
weekly groceries! :), etc....
We are now living one one income which is a very difficult adjustment
especially here in New England. We bought our current house a little
over 2 years ago at the height of the real estate market, so have
a pretty high mortgage, etc. But so far, we feel it is/has been
worth the difficulties, and we feel lucky/blessed that we are able
to do it (live one one income) even though it is not easy. (We
could never understand when people said how expensive babies/children
are...how much could such a little person cost? :) :) :)
Anyway, you are lucky to have the option of a 6 month leave and
possible part time work. Paula was at Wang and had no such options.
It was a permanent break for her from Wang. Paula has a play group
that meets at our house once a week, and is involved in some other
activities as well. She is also very busy just (!) taking care
of Chelsea and keeping the house managed.
If you would like to talk to her or if you are near Nashua, NH,
send me mail and I'll give you our phone number. Whatever you decide,
enjoy your time at home; they grown/change amazingly fast!
Mark
geattxs
|
265.32 | Another one-income family | SCAACT::RESENDE | Digital, thriving on chaos? | Sun Oct 28 1990 23:02 | 39 |
| My wife Pat is staying at home with our 9-month old, Michael. She left
Digital after 11-1/2 years to become a stay-at-home Mom. Though she
had some very strong loyalties to Digital, there was no doubt in her
mind that she wanted to stay home with our son. She's been away from
Digital for just over a year now, and is more convinced than ever that
leaving was the right decision. She and Michael adore each other, and
I've never seen Pat happier. I also think having his Mom home with him
full-time has been good for Michael. She's literally never been away
from him for more than about 3 hours at a time, and misses him even
when they're separated for short periods.
Pat's take on her new job is that she's working longer hours than she
ever did at Digital (about 12-15 hours a day, 7 days a week), and she
probably works *harder* than she did at Digital, but she doesn't have
the tremendous stress that her old job involved. And for her the
stress was what made the Digital job hard.
We too have had to learn to live on far less money than before. When
we were DINKS, we just about did anything we wanted. We had a maid,
ate out a lot in medium-to-high-priced restaurants, bought whatever
clothes and gadgets we wanted, and still managed to put money aside.
Well, Pat now cleans the house. We still send my shirts to the
cleaners, but only because Pat found a laundry that'll do them for 69
cents each (her ironing time is worth more than that!). Many of
Michael's clothes come from resale shops, and Pat manages to dress
him quite well for very little money. Pat's clothing needs are far
less now, of course, so she buys very few things. We eat out
occasionally, but not like we used to ... and with the Munchkin we
usually end up at a family-type place where the bill is much lower than
some of the fancier places we used to frequent. One thing we don't
spend much money on is babysitters. The teenager across the street
sits for us sometimes for $2.00 an hour, but we usually just take
Michael with us when we go out.
It's a very personal decision, one that each couple must make for
themselves. There are many pros and cons on both sides. The important
thing is to do what makes *you* happy.
Steve
|
265.33 | | INFACT::HILGENBERG | | Fri Nov 02 1990 09:45 | 12 |
| re: .31 (Mark)
Unfortunately, New Hampshire is far away from me; I'm in Indianapolis.
BTW, I've also read your topic on stay-at-home activities.
An update: I've talked to my boss about working part-time. He says he really
wants me back and is very willing to work out a part-time deal with me to get
me back. And he wants to make me a project manager. I think he knows I am
wavering and is trying to entice me! I still feel ambivalent; about 90% of me
wants to stay home and 10% wants to go back to work. Or make that 95%-5%.
Kyra
|
265.34 | but would that be a cop-out? | INFACT::HILGENBERG | | Fri Nov 02 1990 09:50 | 6 |
| Last night before I went to sleep I thought to myself, "If I get pregnant
again, I won't have to make this decision -- it will be made for me."
Maybe I'm trying to tell myself something???
Kyra
|
265.35 | New Hampshire insurance law | NOVA::WASSERMAN | Deb Wasserman, DTN 264-1863 | Tue Nov 20 1990 09:54 | 5 |
| Everyone who wants to come back to work part-time talks about having to
work 30 hours to get medical insurance. I just found out that New
Hampshire has a state law that requires employers to provide medical
insurance for people working 15 or more hours a week. So if you live
(and work?) in NH, you can get insurance at R15 or more. News to me!!
|
265.36 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Originality = Undetected Plagiarism | Tue Nov 20 1990 16:44 | 15 |
| > Everyone who wants to come back to work part-time talks about having to
> work 30 hours to get medical insurance. I just found out that New
> Hampshire has a state law that requires employers to provide medical
> insurance for people working 15 or more hours a week. So if you live
> (and work?) in NH, you can get insurance at R15 or more. News to me!!
I just read something about this somewhere (and can't remember exactly where)
but according to that note it is claimed that Digital's health scheme is
not technically insurance, even though it uses an insurance company for
administration and therefore such laws are not applicable. Suffice it to
say that this particular noter was not happy and was going to raise the
roof!
Stuart who is fortunate indeed at not having to worry about health care
like you people south of the border.
|
265.37 | Self-Insured | MYGUY::LANDINGHAM | Mrs. Kip | Wed Nov 21 1990 13:11 | 2 |
| I remember seeing something like that. Under J.H., Digital is self-
insured and John Hancock is the administrator of the plan.
|
265.38 | it will be law in 1992 in MA | AQUA::SAMBERG | | Mon Nov 26 1990 10:10 | 11 |
| Unless it is repealed (which isn't that improbable), the
Massachusetts Universal Health Care law requires that as
of Jan. 1, 1992 that any company with 6 or more
employees must cover employees working 20 hours or more a
week.
So, as of Jan 1, 1992 in Massachusetts, Digital must offer
health care to R20 or better.
Eileen
|
265.39 | Returning to work | 38599::WYSOCKI | | Thu Nov 29 1990 14:22 | 22 |
| I went back to work full time after my daughter was born and never
regretted it. I decided to give it a try and enjoyed it.
I did have the opportunity to take six months off when she was
six months old. So I got the best
of both worlds. I am back working full time and I am expecting my
second baby. I would like to look into job sharing with another
working mom. There are two women in our building that have two kids of
their own and are job sharing. This to me would be the best of both
worlds at this point of my life.
All I can say is try it and go with your own feelings.
J.
|
265.40 | Article from Brazelton on this subject | INFACT::HILGENBERG | | Tue Jan 22 1991 10:01 | 47 |
| Here's an article printed in our newspaper yesterday. The author is
T. Berry Brazelton, professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School
and author of several books on child-rearing from which this article was
adapted. Ironically, the lady who takes care of my daughter gave it
to me as she knows I'm currently struggling with these emotions.
Kyra
----- How Tragic It Is To Say, "I'm Just a Mother" -------
Whatever their situation, new mothers will feel a mixture of
strong emotions when contemplating going back to work.
For the large majority of women who must work, turning a baby
over to other caregivers is never easy. Women who are fortunate enough
to have the choice will feel pulled in two directions.
Those who have already been successful in the workplace before
having a child may be afraid of being placed on a "Mommy Track" if they
ask for extended leave at the time of a new baby or for flexible hours
to be with a sick child or for part-time work.
Any yet, at the same time, they know that such arrangements will
help them mother their small children.
Such conflict can feel extremely stressful.
Those women who can and do choose to stay at home often feel
stressed for different reasons. They say to me, "When I talk baby talk
or get down on the floor to play with my child I feel I'm losing my
identity."
When I ask why, they say, "All of my peers are off making their
careers and I'm just a mommy."
Being "just a mother" at home is often perceived as a secondary
role for women.
What a tragedy! For giving up other roles to nurture a small
child is a gift to the child as well as to the parent.
Not all women can mother best by being at home all the time.
Even with activit children who keep them very busy, mothers
feel the urge to get out of the house and be involved in the adult world.
These urges too can arouse guilt, but all the family is better
off when women respect their own needs.
At present, women are often penalized in the job market if they
don't return to work as soon as possible. And yet the first four
months are vital in cementing the future relationship of mother and baby.
I have been working to make parental leave into national
legislation, as it is in much of Europe.
Any decision about working or not working must also be based on
the availability of a qualified caregiver.
The warmth, understanding and competence of the substitute
caregiver, be it sitter, grandmother, nanny, or day-care provider, are of
deep importance.
|
265.41 | | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Tue Jan 22 1991 14:45 | 15 |
| In re: .40
I learned a good deal from Brazelton's books, and he has been working hard to
learn how to deal with working parents. But he hasn't been 100% successful,
and these remarks in particular are still distinctly sexist. Not that these
aren't real problems for mothers. But fathers can be equally torn by turning
an infant over to daycare. Certainly fathers are far more powerfully
pressured into not taking extended childcare leaves to raise their kids; so
much so that many of them, and Brazelton, lose track of the fact that they
are pressured. Nature limits to women the role of nursing. Not so with
nurturing, which can be performed wonderfully by fathers, or shared between
parents and care providers.
- Bruce
|
265.42 | yes, dads have it hard too | INFACT::HILGENBERG | | Wed Jan 23 1991 08:45 | 17 |
| re: .41
I agree with you that it must be just as hard for fathers! Although my
husband doesn't understand why I am having problems leaving my 7 month
old daughter with a lady who is great (and by the way only cares for my
daughter which is a super setup). He says he has no emotional difficulty
with this situation, especially since it's only 3 days a week from 8 am
to 3:30 pm. So in our personal situation, it does seem as if I am having
the difficulty, not him.
Kyra
P.S. There have been a couple of days where he has watched Michelle
instead of the babysitter and on those days, I feel all my problems
vanish! I definitely feel that the best caregiver besides myself is my
husband. Note that I'm not saying he's not as good as me, just that I'm
selfish and want to take care of her given the choice.
|
265.43 | yep | CSSE32::RANDALL | Pray for peace | Wed Jan 23 1991 13:24 | 13 |
| re: .41
That's certainly the case with us. After a brief period of
adjustment I haven't felt bothered by David's time at the sitter.
I trust her and since she's much more cheerful and calm than I am,
I know it's better for all of us that I work while someone else
takes on the nitty-gritty. But my husband isn't happy with it,
has adjusted his schedule to minimize the amount of time David has
to be at the sitter, and would have taken leave if it hadn't been
so clear that even though men have the right to take parental
leave on paper, in practice it's not a good idea.
--bonnie
|
265.44 | This topic has really hit home for me! | SUBWAY::BAUMGARTNER | | Thu Jan 24 1991 18:58 | 55 |
| I was so glad to find/read all the replies to this note. I've never contributed
to this file before, but have been reading it with great interest for the past 6
months (not coincidentally the amount of time that I've been pregnant with
my first...)
Although the little one isn't even born yet, I find myself doing alot of
soul searching about what life may be like after the baby comes. I've always
been extremely career oriented: have a graduate degree and have held jobs
of increasing responsibility both before joining Digital and since (3 years
now here at DEC). This has meant that for the past 10 years 50+
work weeks were much more the norm than 40 hour ones. My current job has
also included a fairly large amount (30-40%) of out-of-town travel.
Obviously things will change when the baby is born. My thoughts are much
less career oriented than they've ever been -- in fact, right now I'm
not sure if I'll want to work full time after the baby is born (let alone
50-60 hour weeks or lots of out of town travel).
The idea of part-time work appeals to me as possibly the best of both
worlds, but that does not seem to be an option in my current job, which
I will have been at only 1 and 1/2 years when the baby is born. My
manager has clearly stated that she intends to hold me to the 2 year
commitment and said that while she can't keep me from quitting DEC, she
can make sure I don't go anywhere else (within DEC). The no-rehire policy
makes leaving seem so drastic!
BTW, I haven't had many discussions about this with her (my manager). She
doesn't have kids and has not been particularly supportive about my
pregnancy. I had an awful 1st trimester, ended up in the hospital and on
disability for a few weeks with some travel restrictions from my Dr. She
already told me that this 'situation' would have an effect on my PA. (But
didn't state what that effect would be exactly -- I guess that's another issue)
At certain points she has tried to push for a commitment from
me about coming back and resuming full time work/travel schedule, at other
times she implies travel may be a point of flexibility, who knows. Right
now we are not communicating much and I've said that I expect to come back,
but that I really don't know. I've found myself a bit afraid for my job
from time to time, so I've been trying to avoid the subject.
Enough of the boss rathole, though.
Has anyone found that a technically oriented "professional" career is one
that you can kind of 'take a break from' for a few years to concentrate
on raising small children and then return to (say, when the kids are in
school?)
Work complications aside, both my husband and I are DELIGHTED to be
starting a family and we've discussed these issues ALOT -- he has been
very supportive and I expect that to continue no matter what choices are
made. He is definitely a long hours workaholic type with no flexibility
in his job at the present time. (He is a military officer which doesn't
give him much control over this own destiny at times...)
Obviously, I'de welcome any continued discussion on this topic! At least
I know I'm not alone in these concerns, which means alot.
|
265.45 | Off the topic for a second | AIMHI::MAZIALNIK | | Fri Jan 25 1991 09:01 | 13 |
| -1 - sounds like you work for someone I used to work for - sounds
JUST like her. Off the returning to work topic for just a second,
she can't hold your time out on disability against you on your PA.
Someone who was in my last group was threatened with the same
thing and according to the nurse (who was dealing w/her due to the
disability) the manager can't legally do that.
Good luck and I hope you find a job and manager within Digital
with some flexibility who believes there is life beyond work.
Donna
|
265.46 | | FDCV07::HSCOTT | Lynn Hanley-Scott | Fri Jan 25 1991 09:06 | 24 |
| re .44
Wow! You are really juggling a lot! 50+ hr. weeks and lots of travel
are pretty tough with an infant, as is dealing with an unsupportive
boss who is pressuring you already about coming back to work.
Try spending some time with a friend who has kids and see what's
involved. That may help your thoughts and discussions with your husband
around job juggling, travel, and daycare stuff.
Separately, talk to personnel about possible leave etc, and about this
comment on STD affecting your PA. That seems like b.s. to me.
Most importantly, realize that whatever you think before the baby is
born is very likely to change after the baby is born. There's some
excellent discussion in here, or perhaps V1, about women who wanted to
stay home and very staunchly changed their minds after the baby was
born, and vice versa. It's difficult to judge how you will be until you
have the baby living in your home and a major part of your life.
best of luck with whatever you decide... the boss part really gets me,
since my manager is the absolute opposite and couldn't be more
supportive or flexible.
|
265.47 | | STAR::MACKAY | C'est la vie! | Fri Jan 25 1991 09:38 | 29 |
|
re.44
Sounds like your manager/supervisor needs more "updating" training.
When I had my second child a few months ago, my supervisor repeatedly
said that I should consider taking the 8 weeks of parental leave
beyond the STD, even though he knew the project schedule would be
affected. No manager can deny you of the parental leave. I didn't take
the extra time since I don't like to be home-bound in the winter time.
I put in my 40-ish week and go home. Everyone knows I leave at 4:30 pm,
no ifs and but's. If needed, I can start my day real early, or do some
reading at home. If the project cannot be completed on time based on
40 hour weeks, it is the project leader job to either get more help
or to revise the schedule. Working overtime occasionally is one thing,
putting in extra hours every week is not acceptable. I did have to
give up some travel opportunities (there are more like DECUS and
trade shows). Does it make me a less valuable person in the group?
I don't think so.
But I think it is up to me to put my cards on the table. Essentially,
I have to know how I want to live my life. Work is always here for
years to come. But, your kid(s) do not wait for you, they just
keep on growing. Also, remember that your manager/supervisor's
job is to help you with your development, how and when you want
to develop your career is up to you NOT her.
Eva.
|
265.48 | | TIPTOE::STOLICNY | | Fri Jan 25 1991 09:57 | 37 |
|
I second (or third) everything that has been said already including:
1.) You probably won't know exactly what you'll want/need to do
until after the baby arrives (and even then you will probably
have some uncertainties). It is unrealistic of your boss to
expect you to make promises based on this fact; it's probably
reasonable to ask you what your current *plan* is.
2.) Parental leave of absense is a benefit that you are entitled to.
There are restrictions however as to how long you can be out
and still be guaranteed your position when you return (4weeks?).
3.) Your disability should have no effect on your PA. I believe
that the LOA would push the PA out by the term of the LOA however.
I can't believe that managers such as you've described exist in this
day and age in Digital (well, I can .... but I WISH they didn't!!)
As far as part-time work schedules are concerned, I'd encourage you
to get a copy of the "Alternative Work Schedule Guide" put out in
Nov, 1989 by the Greater Marlboro Area Personnel Operations and share
it with your boss. One of the interesting things in the guide is
the cost/benefit analysis. It shows that productivity of the part
time worker is so much highter than the full time workers, that Digital
receives approx the same output from a 32-hour/week worker as a
40-hour/week worker at 20% less salary. I have just come back to
a 40-hour work week after a year at 32 hours and I can personally
vouch for this phenomena!
As far as leaving a technical field for several years to raise
children, I personally decided it was a risk I didn't want to take
(coupled with the fact that I knew I'd be unhappy at home full-time).
Good luck whatever you decide,
Carol
|
265.49 | Wow, there really are some nice people at DEC! | SUBWAY::BAUMGARTNER | | Fri Jan 25 1991 11:19 | 22 |
| Boy you guys are the nicest people I've ever met in notes! I usually
limit myself to technical conferences only and people get pretty nasty
in there.
RE: all the boss stuff. Yeah, it has not been pleasant and I know that
I should talk to personel about the situation. I've been putting it
off and putting it off, hoping things will magically 'get better'.
Kind of ironic, but after I posted this last evening, my boss stopped
by my cube and started talking about all the projects she wants me to
get involved with 'next'. Honestly, her list would be too extensive if
I wasn't going to be a parent of a newborn -- she is possessed!
I'm hoping that I can decide what is best for everyone concerned
without making this bad situation the focal point, hence the other more
generic questions I raised. (Based on only my current situation,
nothing would please me more than chucking it all -- but that seems so
'knee jerk')
Thanks for your input! Reading all the replies of this note has given
me a better perspective (and made me realize I'm being unrealistic by
expecting to know exactly what I'll want!)
|
265.50 | Merging work and babies | WINDY::SHARON | Sharon Starkston | Fri Jan 25 1991 11:38 | 10 |
| I had a similiar schedule (long hours and heavy travel) while I was pregnant,
in a great job that I loved. It was fortunate for me that the company
reorganized about the time of the birth and I arranged for a more
parent-friendly position to come back to after an eight week absence.
If you would like to correspond off line about the sensitive topics this
raises (managing travel, how one's career is affected, managers, life
in the field) feel free to send mail.
=ss
|
265.51 | what about 6 mos from birth? 6 yrs from birth? | INFACT::HILGENBERG | | Mon Jan 28 1991 09:32 | 14 |
| re: .44 (what is your first name?)
Not only do you not know what you want until the child
is born, but you may *always* be in doubt! I just
started back to work a month ago after a six month
leave and I still have ambivalent feelings. It is only
20 hours a week so that's good but I still feel like
I want to be with Michelle all the time. So I guess I'm
saying (and this might have already been said in a
previous reply) that you also need to be prepared to
be constantly changing your mind, re-evaluating your
family situation, etc.
Kyra
|
265.52 | yep, sounds right. | CSSE32::RANDALL | Pray for peace | Mon Jan 28 1991 16:25 | 17 |
| Kyra's right about that -- since David was born, I took the full
maternity leave, came back to work full time, went onto part time
(as much for the six-year-old starting school as for the baby), and
am now back full time . . . and I'm not completely happy with any
option.
I think it impacted my relationship with the older children more than with
the baby. Many people find babies more fun, but as far as actual needs
go, most babies are happy as long as somebody is feeding them and playing
with them. The older child needs *you* as an individual much more.
All in all having an interesting job that sustains me more than drains
me (the present one) seems to be worth the extra hassle and the reduced
time at home. I'm able to be more present for the time I do have
because I'm more satisfied with myself. But I do miss the extra time...
--bonnie
|
265.53 | I am starting to believe I may never know | SUBWAY::BAUMGARTNER | | Tue Jan 29 1991 18:14 | 19 |
| > re: .44 (what is your first name?)
Rhonda
re: everyone's response
Well, I've been doing lots of 'interviewing' of the Mom's that I know
with small kids and their responses pretty much match all of yours...
It is kind of ironic when I think about it, before I met my
husband (I was in my late 20's when I did), I had kind of decided
I would never get married let alone be a parent. After I did meet him
and realized that marriage sounded ok, I was convinced I would never
be the type that would 'compromise' my career for a baby. Now I'm more
excited about this upcoming kid than I could have imagined.
I'm starting to realize why "Never say Never" is a wise saying! So, I
guess I'll try to keep stradling this fence: not burning my bridges,
but at the same time not firmly committing to things I'm not sure of.
|
265.54 | The shoe is on the other foot now!! | ULTRA::DONAHUE | | Wed Jan 30 1991 12:37 | 14 |
| re: -1
I know what you mean about "never say never".
Before I had Daniel (3.5 months ago), I could not understand how any
one could stay home all day and take care of their child. I "needed"
my job for the self esteem.
Well, I've been back to work for 3 weeks and I hate leaving Daniel at
the sitters. I can't wait to pick him up and take him home after work.
And I only work 6 hours in the office plus two hours at home at night.
Funny how situations can change :-)
Norma
|