T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
115.1 | my opinion | ASABET::TRUMPOLT | Liz - ML05-3/T92 - 223-6321 | Mon Jul 09 1990 14:14 | 11 |
| IMO, bumper pads shouldn't be removed from the crib until the child is
old enough to go into a regular bed. I feel this way because my son
moves all the time while sleeping and I don't want him to hit his poor
head on the sides of the crib, which only makes since. Everyone else
that I know has left them on until the remove the child from the crib
to a bed.
This is only my opinion. But I think its a good one.
Liz
|
115.2 | JA's bumper pads --> sleeping helmet! | HPSCAD::DJENSEN | | Mon Jul 09 1990 14:19 | 24 |
|
Sue:
JA (at 10 months) not only stands on her bumper pads, but she pulls on
them until the ties tear off (bow is on the crib railing and she's
chewing on the pad!). I swore I was going to remove the pads (was
getting tired of restitching the ties!), but then I think -- I can't
recall ever seeing JA sound asleep, NICELY positioned in the center of
the crib! She's ALWAYS plastered against the bumper pads and every now
and then we still hear her roll over and hit her head against the
railings (and then thank goodness the pads are still there to buffer
the blow).
Most parents say "when they start standing up in the crib and
ultimately standing on the pads". Some say they remove them to avoid
entanglement (when the kid starts getting mobile). For us, we'll
probably keep the pads a bit longer and hope she starts settling down
during her ZZZZ'ing ... OR someday when she rips ALL the ties off in
one sitting!
My 2 cents worth.
Dottie
|
115.3 | Another reason for keeping them in | SHARE::SATOW | | Mon Jul 09 1990 14:25 | 13 |
| I can't really think of a good reason for removing them, but I can think of
reasons not to remove them, as mentioned in .1 and .2. I also think that
there is a better reason for having them. The baby can easily get their arms
or legs through the crib slats; subsequent movement may exert pressure on the
joints or bones.
At about the age of one, our daughter broke her femur (the bone that runs
between the knee and the hip). To this day, we don't know what caused it, but
getting her through the crib slats and twisting her leg is the only thing that
we can think of.
Clay
|
115.4 | Our three-fold experience... | ASHBY::ORTH | $IF WEEKEND THEN SET KIDS/WAKEUP=LATE | Mon Jul 09 1990 16:06 | 31 |
| Hi sue!
Ah, seems like just yesterday when Katie was born and now its time for
all this fun stuff, huh??
We took ourbumper pads off our three kids cribs at varying ages.
Although we'd always heard the old "take them off when they stand",
that was never the impetus for us. I think all three of ours were off
by the age of 1, but not because of standing on them. After all they
can just as easily stand on a wadded up blanket, a stuffed bear, or
whtever. We took them off, in all three cases, because they would start
lifting them up (sliding them up the rails...often took great
maneuvering of snaps and ties), pulling them toward themselves, and all
3 managed to get their heads under the bumper pads bottom edge. While
this didn't cause any of them any damage, it caused us some
consternation about them possible somehow strangling. Our kids were all
(still are for that matter :-) ) very restless sleepers, but we figured
that the force with which they might bump there heads on the rails was
not likely to cause any damage (unless they *really* thrashed, which
they never did), and not much discomfort (and none of them ever woke up
from it...or had any discernable bumps or bruises), but the danger from
strangling was far too scary and real. so we removed them. Josh was
probably the oldest when he figured it out....about 15 or 16 months,
Carrie was youngest...about 10 months (but we really made an effort to
secure hers for a bit cause she's so tiny we were afraid she'd still be
able to slip her whole body through the rails...not her head, but hte
rest of her body), and Daniel, who's still in the crib at 14 months,
has been without his about 2 months.
I know this is long...sorry...but I guess the sum-up is.........
Take 'em out if they're a problem and leave 'em in if they're not!
--dave--
|
115.5 | | SCAACT::RESENDE | Just an obsolete child | Mon Jul 09 1990 21:36 | 18 |
| RE: <<< Note 115.4 by ASHBY::ORTH "$IF WEEKEND THEN SET KIDS/WAKEUP=LATE" >>>
>>We took them off, in all three cases, because they would start
>>lifting them up (sliding them up the rails...often took great
>>maneuvering of snaps and ties), pulling them toward themselves, and all
>>3 managed to get their heads under the bumper pads bottom edge. While
>>this didn't cause any of them any damage, it caused us some
>>consternation about them possible somehow strangling.
Good grief, Michael's not even six months old yet, and he does that!
We figured he's mobile enough to get out from under the bumper pad when
he wants to, so it wasn't a problem! Can you elaborate on how you
thought your kids might strangle themselves by putting their heads
under the pads? If there's danger here, I'd sure like to know about
it!
Steve
|
115.6 | Them shore is stiff pads... | MCIS5::WOOLNER | Photographer is fuzzy, underdeveloped and dense | Mon Jul 09 1990 23:43 | 3 |
| ...if the baby can get any altitude by standing on 'em!
Leslie
|
115.7 | | WFOV11::BRODOWSKI | | Tue Jul 10 1990 11:21 | 4 |
| I agree with .1. I left the pads on till Adrienne went into her
waterbed at age 18 months.
Denise
|
115.8 | replies to .5 and .6 | ASHBY::ORTH | $IF WEEKEND THEN SET KIDS/WAKEUP=LATE | Wed Jul 11 1990 10:13 | 30 |
| re .5
We have used two different kind of bumper pads. The first my wife made
and were soft...actually too soft, they didn't stay up super well. Our
first child, Josh, could get his head under, but seemed to have trouble
getitng it back out...couldn't get it up over his chin, if on his back,
of would lift his head up, if on his tummy, and then with it still up,
try to pull back through. He never was successful and used to really
get himself really upset...so we took them off to prevent any nasty
consequences. With Carrie and Daniel, we had store bought pads that
were thick foam rubber (1 � inches wide, about 6 inches high) covered
in vinyl (although we liked the cloth for its softness against the
skin, you can't beat the wipe-off washability convenience of the vinyl
and it still protected their little heads extrememly well). they could
each lift these, get heads under, and then never seem able to lift them
again to get heads back out. Maybe the angle was bad, I don't know.
These pads were heavier than our first ones, and the kids really
screamed when they'd get under them, and then couldn't get back out.
Maybe we were over-reacting about strangulation danger, but I don't
think by much, and it was clear, one way or another, the babies were
all uncomfortable when they'd get under and couldn't get back out. So
we took them off, and never regretted it.
re .6-
As mentioned above, the foam rubber bumper pads were pretty stiff and
they probably could have gained, oh, say, and extra 3-4inches, but when
our mattress is all the way down, they still wouldn't have been
anywhere near close to being able to flip over the rail, so that was
not a worry, even with stiff bumper pads!
--dave--
|
115.9 | | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Wed Jul 11 1990 13:27 | 12 |
| Gee, it never occured to me to analyse bumper pads on medical grounds,
and I've never heard a pediatrician recommend them. Certainly crib
safety standards do not assume pads, and the testimony here makes clear
that safety cuts both ways. I suspect they're approximately neutral,
medically, but serve 4 main purposes: aesthetics (like frilly curtains);
metaphysics (like bottle warming); expanded opportunities for
commercial expenditure; expanded opportunities for grandparental gifts
to baby. Ours were handmade by grandma, very lovely: forest green with
frogs. They stayed in the crib until the ties started detaching, which
was after about 1.37 kids. Then we did happily without pads.
- Bruce
|
115.10 | please be careful | SMURF::HAECK | Debby Haeck | Wed Jul 11 1990 13:35 | 12 |
| Strangulation is not just a remote possibiliy. It can and does happen.
The one case I distinctly remember reading about was a plea by a mother
on the USENET. She had recently lost her 7 month old daughter. She
had checked her daughter napping in her crib and HAD CHECKED THE TIES
ON THE BUMPER PAD. 45 minutes later she checked again and one of the
ties had come undone and was wrapped around the daughters neck.
(btw: I did use bumper pads even after reading that story. But I was
a lot more consistent about checking the ties, and I removed the pads
when the baby(s) were old enough to roll away from the side of the crib
on their own.)
|
115.11 | alternative for bumper ties | ASHBY::ORTH | $IF WEEKEND THEN SET KIDS/WAKEUP=LATE | Wed Jul 11 1990 13:59 | 16 |
| boy, I guess that makes me feel that we made the right decision in our
kids case!
Something to consider...
On the bumper pads my wife made, there were ties, like on most pads.
But on the store-bought foam ones, there were short little pieces of
elastic (about 1/4 wide) with snaps on them. These were way too short
for a kid to strangle on (each one was only about 3 inches long) and
the snaps held the pads on as tight as ties would have. If I were to
use cloth ones again, that had ties, I might likely be inclined to
replace the ties with snaps set into short pieces of elastic. The
elastic and the snaps can be had in any fabric store, or probably craft
type store, and the snaps are easily installed securely, if the directions
are followed...my wife's used them on other stuff for the kids. Just my
opinion, but the effort might be worth it!
--dave--
|
115.12 | | AIMHI::MAZIALNIK | | Wed Jul 11 1990 14:10 | 8 |
| Our store bought cloth bumper pads have ties and there is no
way that they are long enough to strangle a baby. How long
are these ties anyway? You'd think a manufacturer would not
make a tie any longer than is needed to tie the two ties
together.
Donna
|
115.13 | | PHAROS::PATTON | | Wed Jul 11 1990 14:45 | 16 |
| A comment on the baby hurting herself on the bars after you remove
the pads. We took our pads off after they were trampled, torn, yanked,
etc., probably when Dan was about 18 mos old. He has always done a
lot of thrashing while asleep, and likes to jam his head into the
corner of the crib. He adjusted to the lack of pads just fine - he
must have made a mental note to back off on the intensity of the
crashing and banging.
He demonstrated this same ability to adjust recently when he moved
from crib to youth bed (now at 2 yrs 7 months). We did not put any
kind of bars or restraints on the bed; one of the long sides is
completely open. He fell out the first night onto the pillows we
had piled underneath and has never fallen out again (to my knowledge).
Lucy
|
115.14 | | BINKLY::CHUI | | Thu Dec 26 1991 14:43 | 8 |
| I was reading the CONSUMER REPORT the other day and it talked about
bumper pads. It said bumper pads should be removed once the baby is
capable of pulling himself/herself up. It said this is to avoid
strangulation.
Still waiting for our first baby. Can't say from experience.
Kwong
|
115.15 | more like a step stool | MCIS5::TRIPP | | Thu Dec 26 1991 15:24 | 10 |
| Since I don't know what the consumer report said, I can't rule out the
bumper pads as a possible strangulation hazard. I'd suggest they mean
to remove them because some of them are firm enough that little people
can use them to stand on, and possible end up toppling over the
railings. Unless they are plastic (my sister had blow up kind, like a
pool flotation device) They shouldn't be a suffocation threat, as for
strangulation, I'd say only if the ties can be undone and put into the
little mouth. In that case tie the bows double.
Lyn
|
115.16 | | USOPS::GALLANT | Everybody grab a body... | Mon Dec 30 1991 13:09 | 11 |
| My daughter can now pull herself upright in her crib but
I've hesitated taking out the bumper pads because when she
slips backward or loses her balance, I'd rather have her hit
the cloth of the bumper pad than the wood of the crib.
I also find it helpful in keeping the pacifer in the crib
instead of falling onto the floor. It also helps (not
much, but...) when she slips forward and her hands or feet
make an attempt to come through the slits...
/Kim
|
115.17 | | CLOSUS::DONAHUE | | Tue Dec 31 1991 13:54 | 11 |
| Hate to digress, but...
Has anyone made a set of bumper pads for the crib? I am due in April
and was thinking of making a matching set of bumper pads and bedding.
Is this a good idea or should I stick with the store bought versions?
All I seem to be able to find lately are the plastic ones.
Thanks,
Susan
|
115.18 | Yup, I made em... | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Thu Jan 02 1992 10:02 | 19 |
| I made bumper pads. They weren't too difficult. I got a pattern for
a bunch of bedding. I made the bumpers, quilt, dust ruffle, and
diaper bag. (I also made curtains and pillows for the bed that is in
the room.)
One thing that I did do was to double the amount of padding called
by the pattern (for the bumpers). When I put the called for amount in,
it just didn't feel as thick as the ones in the designer patterns
at the crib stores.
The hardest part of the bumpers was putting a trim on them and making
sure the ties were all on the same side.
I bought bumpers for my sister at Child World, and they were cotton.
They weren't as expensive as the designer stuff, but they also weren't
plastic. I prefer the cotton, because it is softer than plastic and
many babies seem to sleep in the corner, right up against the bumpers.
judy
|
115.19 | | CLOSUS::DONAHUE | | Thu Jan 02 1992 10:24 | 12 |
| The trim and the ties is mostly what I'm concerned about. I do a lot
of quilting and I make a few clothes for my first daughter, but I'm
not sure I can handle the bumpers.
I'm still thinking of buying plain colored cotton ones and then just
making a set of dust ruffles, a wall hanging and a crib quilt out of a
matching patterned material.
Thanks for the input!
Susan
|
115.20 | | MCIS5::SHERMAN | Denise DeFosse | Thu Jan 02 1992 13:06 | 14 |
| I do a fair amount of sewing and making bumper pads for me was easy. I
have a pattern that has the quilt, diaper bag, bumper pads, wall
hangings and other items. I've used the quilt pattern quite a few
times, for relatives and friends that are having babies. I think it is
much better to make the bumper pads (or anything else becuase it is much
cheaper) then buying them in a store, things are getting so expensive,
you can end up making most of these things for 1/2 the price of buying
them in a store. I am also due in April (with twins) my first, so this
pattern is getting quite a lot of use lately.
My two cents worth.
Denise
|
115.21 | | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Thu Jan 02 1992 13:33 | 14 |
| If you don't put a trim on the bumper pads, then you don't need to
worry at all. It's the trim that is a bit of a pain (generally when
you are pinning them together...) and it is the trim that makes the
ties fall to one side or the other.
So, if you want to use the same fabric that you do for the rest of the
room, go ahead and just skip the trim.
My husband hates ruffles, so I used a covered cording for the trim. I
think a ruffle would be a lot easier, especially if you bought it ready
to sew on and didn't make your own. Give it a try, what have you got
to lose?
judy
|
115.22 | | CLOSUS::DONAHUE | | Fri Jan 03 1992 10:37 | 6 |
| OK, OK, you guys talked me into it. And along with all the supporting
mail messages--I'm going to give it a try.
I'll be getting the pattern and materials over the weekend.
:-)
|
115.23 | | PCOJCT::REIS | God is my refuge | Tue Jan 07 1992 13:59 | 7 |
|
FWIW; my girlfriend bought the plastic bumper pads and then made covers
for them with velcro closings so she could take them off and wash them.
She then made matching bedspread, curtains, dust ruffle, pillow, and
anything else she could think of!!!
Trudy
|