T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
93.1 | inhibit mobility? Nah! | SHALDU::MCBLANE | | Thu Jun 28 1990 17:11 | 12 |
| My husband's feet turned in and his legs are still slightly bowed today.
His father took a piece of wood and nailed his shoes to it so they
turned out. (His father will never buy anything if he doesn't HAVE to.)
They made him wear it to bed for a while (couple years?).
After a while he had no problem climbing out of his crib in this
thing and hopping down the hall to the bathroom to get a drink of
water. Then he had to wake up his parents to put him back in bed.
Today his feet are fine.
-Amy
|
93.2 | Son had curved foot, too | MSBCS::BEAUREGARD | | Thu Jun 28 1990 17:13 | 21 |
| My son Seth had this problem, only not to the same degree of
involvement as your son. Only his left foot curved inward and his legs
weren't bowed. Also, he was only four months old when he first went to the
orthopedic surgeon so we didn't have to worry about interfering with
his mobility. Briefly, we did those exercises for about 4 or 5 weeks,
but the doctor had to fit Seth with a Bebax shoe - a white, expensive
item that looks like a sandal since the exercises didn't work. The
shoe looks like it is on the wrong foot when you put it on. I guess it
stretches the skin on the inside of the foot. He wore that day and
night for about three months, then just days for about two weeks. He
was seen by the specialist at two week intervals to check on his
progress. By the end of the three and half month duration his foot was
fine and no longer needed to wear the shoe. It was more of a nuisance
than anything else - certainly not worrisome like an illness - and Seth
was never in any discomfort from it. Since your son is older, almost
walking and both feet are involved you'll probably have it a bit
rougher than we did. Good luck - hope all your son needs are the
shoes!
Annette B.
|
93.3 | Our experience | COMET::BOLDEN | | Thu Jun 28 1990 19:30 | 15 |
| Valarie,
My daughter also had this problem. She was diagnosed at 6 mos (just as
she was beginning to crawl). The orthopedic surgeon that she saw
(1975). Put her in shoes with a bar in between. She had to readjust
to turning over, but eventually learned to crawl and even to "walk"
with it on (the walking was hanging on to furniture). She even slept
in this. This procedure went on for about 1 year, and then she
graduated to just sleeping in it and wearing corrective shoes with
lifts to turn out her feet. She wore the corrective shoes until she
was about 4 (although she dropped the shoes and bar at night after
about 2 years). Her feet and legs are now fine (she is now 16).
Jackie
|
93.4 | correction to .1 | SHALDU::MCBLANE | | Thu Jun 28 1990 19:35 | 11 |
| RE: .1
I just talked to my in-laws about this to get the details straight.
My husband wore the shoes nailed to a piece of wood from age 2-3 for
about a year. He could climb out of his crib and crawl with it on,
but could not keep his balance to walk.
Another technique they sometimes used was to put his shoes on the
wrong feet.
-Amy
|
93.5 | | BUSY::DKHAN | | Fri Jun 29 1990 10:44 | 17 |
| My parents were told that I was pigeon toed whenI was little. I
had to where a pair of shoes (toes cut off) nailed to a board at
night for a while. To tell you the truth, I don't think I was pigeon
toed. I didn't wear it for long. I hated it!
My girlfriend also had to wear this (at about 5 yrs old) and told
me she used to get out of bed to go to the bathroom, and jump down
the hall with the thing on (woke her parents up every time cuz it
was so loud).
I am not pigeon toed. She, on the other hand, is terribly pigeon
toed.
Don't know if this helps, just my experince. Have yuo gotten a second
opinion? Just a thought.
Dot
|
93.6 | second opinion and detailed diagnosis | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Fri Jun 29 1990 10:57 | 30 |
| 1. Make sure you get them to distinguish functional effects from
cosmetic effects. Some children have trouble walking (excess
tripping) or doing other activities because of the foot twisting,
for others the feet work fine but are noticeably out of line, and
for still others the twisting will be noticeable only when you
look for it. It's certainly valid to treat the condition based on
cosmetic reasons but you'll want to be fully informed about the
exact degree and of what, if any, problems it's likely to cause as
the child grows up.
2. Getting a second opinion is a real good idea.
One of Kat's feet turns in a bit; her first pediatrician (when she
was 5) thought it should be treated. We did some exercises for a
while, but when we moved to Nashua the new doctor said that unless
it was causing problems in walking or whatever, it wasn't worth
the cost and effort.
A couple of years of gymnastics, where foot placement is very
important, took care of any problems there might have been. Now
if you actually look at her footprints in the sand, you can see
that her feet don't turn out the exact same amount, but she can
voluntarily turn them wherever she needs to (fifth positon pli� or
whatever).
All in all I think I'd recommend gymnastics or ballet to
strengthen the leg and feet muscles rather than nails and
boards...
--bonnie
|
93.7 | infancy foot problem | COMET::MCDERMOTT | | Fri Jun 29 1990 13:31 | 7 |
| When my sister Erin was a baby she also had that problem. She had the
bar screwed into her shoes but they also had her wear her shoes
backwards. I don't recall it bothering her much, but I do know her
feet and legs are fine and perfectly normal today, so it obviously
works.
|
93.8 | It hurts the parents more than the kids | CURIE::DONCHIN | | Fri Jun 29 1990 13:32 | 27 |
| Valerie-
My daughter (now 27 months) had this problem with BOTH feet. She went
through the cast treatment (three sets of casts for two weeks, with the
feet rotated further outward each time the casts were changed), the
corrective shoes for a few months, and then the corrective shoes with
the bar for a few months. Unlike your situation, Jamie's problem was
diagnosed at birth, so her treatments started at age three months and
ended before she was mobile. However, I don't regret for a moment
having put her through all the treatments because she now has a
beautiful set of straight, chubby feet. I can't imagine how
difficult/painful it would've been for her to use her feet the way they
were (both physically and emotionally in later years).
I think the whole situation was more difficult for me than for Jamie,
but we got through it. Although you're dealing with it at a later stage
than us, I'm glad you're considering it before it becomes too late to
do anything about the problem.
Please send mail or call if you want more info about our situation.
Good luck!
Nancy-
P.S. - Your health insurance/plan may cover the shoes (ours did), so
you might want to ask up front.
|
93.9 | | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Fri Jun 29 1990 13:50 | 25 |
| Aaron was treated for a similar problem starting at about six months.
Some unevenness in growth of muscles or tendons caused him to curl his
feet inwards. If untreated, this would eventually lead to permanent
skeletal deformation, and could eventually involve ankles and knees.
At this age I don't think the distinction between cosmetic and
functional difficulties is meaningful, as an untreated case will
probably be progressive. In Aaron's case, stretching exercises and
daytime use of reverse-curved shoes took care of the problem, and he
was 100% fine in a couple of years. But it wasn't certain at first
that this would be enough, so braces and the like were discussed. The
shoes didn't bother him at all, and may even have contributed to his
being an early walker. The only drawback was that there were no
hand-me-down shoes for Eric, who didn't share the problem!
I think the basenoter essentially already has a second opinion, since
doubtless the pediatrician gave the referral to the orthopedist.
Unless some drastic treatment is recommended, I wouldn't feel much need
to chase additional opinions, if I had confidence in the doctor.
Our orthopedist was in Winchester, and I can remember some delightful
times watching the ducks in the pond near his office, before and after
appointments. I'm glad that that is the association I am left with!
- Bruce
|
93.10 | ALSO RECOMMEND SECOND OPINION | EBBV03::LUND | | Fri Jun 29 1990 13:52 | 28 |
| My son also had a foot problem. His was discovered at birth. He had
what they call wind swept feet. His right foot turned in and the left
turned out. My Pedi at the time had me exercise his feet until his six
week check up. At the check up he had not improved so he recommended a
orthopedic specialist. We took him to the doctor he recommended and
at his first visit the doctor said he need casts immediately to correct
the problem. He was 2 1/2 months old when he was scheduled for his
first visit. Every two weeks I had to soak the casts off and take him
back for new ones. After approx. 6 mos. of this he said he was ready
for the orthopedic shoes (open toed). I did not see any improvement.
Every time he would sit in his swing or any relaxed position his feet
would fall into to the wind swept position. I finally called a
different doctor and made a appt. The first thing he did was take
X-rays which the other doctor didn't. He found that his right leg turn-
ed in was because when he was relaxed his whole leg was rotated in the
socket of the hip and on his left leg it turned out because the bone
that goes from the knee to the ankle was rotate out. All this was due
to his position during pregnancy. He wore a bar on his feet only at
nap and bedtime and every week we had to go and have it adjusted. At
the beginning the bar was set exactly like his feet were going and
little by little the doctor turned the shoes on the bar to go the
other way. Once he got his feet rotated back he wore the bar for about
six months and then was done. He is now 6 and is fine. I highly
recommend more than one opinion.
Good Luck!
Pam
|
93.11 | Depends on technique used | SMAUG::RLAMONT | | Fri Jun 29 1990 15:03 | 18 |
| I have heard of this. I thought they stopped the shoes on a bar thing
a long time ago. Seems like a dark ages technique, however, it must
work. I myself had flat feet and had to have special shoes made to
accomodate my problem. Back in 1960 they ran my folks over $30. a
pair, so that tells you how expensive things can run.
I don't know how long something like this takes to correct. I think
each child is different and it depends on how fast they develop and how
well the technique that's being used is working. If he's *casted* I
imagine that would be VERY difficult to walk, or would limit him to NO
walking at all. If he has to wear the shoes on the bar they may only
require him to do that at night or so many hours a day.
I would try to make a game out of his exercises so he really enjoys
doing them.
Best of luck
|
93.12 | shoes on the worng feet helps | ASABET::TRUMPOLT | Liz - ML05-3/T92 - 223-6321 | Mon Jul 02 1990 12:00 | 14 |
| My son Alexander has this problem with both his feet, they both turned
in. His pedi noticed it when he was about 1 month old and told us to put
his sneakers on the wrong feet, He will be 8 months old on July 4th and
his right foot is stright and his left one is almost so he has made
good progress by wareing is sneakers on the wrong feet. His pedi told
me when I buy him shoes to buy Strid rit because they are made for baby
feet and are cut to not hurt their little ankle bones. So I will be
going to strid-rite to get Alex measured for a new pair of sneakers or
shoes (which ever I want to buy) he is in a size 2 know and his toes
are starting to touch the tip of his sneakers so I think its time for a
new pair.
Liz
|
93.13 | foot problems | MAMIE::POULIN | | Mon Jul 02 1990 13:44 | 14 |
| My brother had the same problem, maybe a little more severe. His left
foot was what the doctors called a club-foot. They noticed it at birth
and I can remember mom bringing him home with a little tiny cast on his
foot. She saved all of them, there must be fifteen of then which means
he was in a cast for about three or four months. Then he had the shoes
that exposed the toes and was connected to the bar. I can remember him
crawling and standing with it. Sometimes in the morning mom would find
it off of him. He never seemed to mind it much. For years the left
foot was noticable smaller than the right and she use to purchase shoes
at different sizes for him. Today he is 21 and has no problems with
his feet what so ever. As a matter of fact he is an excellent skier.
carole
|
93.14 | shoes or barefoot? | DELNI::SCORMIER | | Mon Jul 02 1990 15:12 | 8 |
| Someone mentioned Stride Rite shoes as being recommended by their pedi.
My 6 month old is begining to pull himself up to a stand, and runs
circles around us in his walker. I usually leave him barefoot
(vacuuming once a day to be absolutely certain there is nothing sharp
or dangerous on the floor to injure his feet). I've read both - get
them proper-fitting shoes, let them go barefoot. Which is correct?
Sarah
|
93.15 | To confuse you more... | TPS::JOHNSON | | Mon Jul 02 1990 15:33 | 17 |
| Sarah,
Steven had his 8 mos. checkup on Friday and I asked the doctor
the same thing. We always have him in stocking or barefeet,
a habit we got in when he had a skin irratation on his toes.
Now that he is pulling up to stand and taking steps as we
hold his fingers, I was wasn't sure what to do since I had
read the same things you have.
My pedi surprized me and said not to spend alot of money
on special shoes, that hi top sneakers would do just fine.
I had read alot to the contrary on this one. But since
we have hi tops for him already, I will try them out and
he how he does.
Linda
|
93.16 | | SHARE::SATOW | | Mon Jul 02 1990 15:52 | 13 |
| re: .13, .14, .15
I'd be careful about generalizing any of these individual pieces of advice.
It could be that barefoot or generic sneakers are fine for kids with "normal"
feet but that a specific kind, such as Stride Rite, is appropriate for kids
with a specific type of foot makeup. We never had problems with shoes for our
daughter -- used generic shoes until she became fashion concious -- but our
son had an unusually shaped foot, and Stride-Rites were the only ones that fit
both his heel and his toes. Also, I think as these notes point out, there is
a difference of opinion among physicians as to what kind of shoes to use, if
any. I'd get my own ped's opinion.
Clay
|
93.17 | | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Mon Jul 02 1990 16:10 | 10 |
| I suspect it doesn't make much difference, except if there is a
specific orthopedic problem to be corrected. It semed to me that a few
million years of evolution looked favorably on bare feet. A crawling
baby doesn't need shoes for safety, as they put more weight on hands
than feet. And a learning-to-stand-and-walk baby would seem to benefit
most from the traction and sensation made possible by bare feet. But
then Aaron had to wear orthopedic shoes, with rigid slippery leather
soles; and the shoes didn't slow him down at all when he decided to
stand.
- Bruce
|
93.18 | | STAR::MACKAY | C'est la vie! | Mon Jul 02 1990 17:03 | 19 |
|
From what I have read, barefoot is preferred unless there is a problem
with the feet. I think the arguments for barefoot are
- better air circulation ;-)
- better traction with the help of toes
- help to develop the arch
- more comfortable
- cheapest option!
Unless the kid really need them, the Stride Rite walkers are really
very uncomfortable (they remind me of hiking boots!). I would opt
for softer shoes like Toddler University, BabyJaz or Kisco(sp).
My kid never wear shoes inside the house because we don't. We walk
around barefoot, in socks or slippers.
Eva.
|