T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1055.1 | Ours "slowed down"... | KMOOSE::CMCCUTCHEON | The Karate Moose | Fri Nov 24 1995 14:19 | 22 |
| Our almost 3 year old is larger than average. Last I remember he was at
the 75% percental for height and 90% for weight.
He shot through clothes fast at under a year old. Since being two, he's
slowed down some. He's tending to get a bit taller and skinnier rather
than "plump". Before walking he became quite plump, since he couldn't
excercise beyond screaming and kicking. 8-)
My only advice I guess is not to buy too many expensive clothes, since yours
will go through them fast. Look for sales and buy the next size up, since
you'll probably need it "soon". Get stretchy stuff (sweat suits, etc), and
get them larger than you need. They'll shrink, and the kid will grow! And,
as I said, our experience is that ours slowed down a bit. Also keep the
hardly worn clothes. You can either lend them, or if you get another kid,
they can use them...
As for problems carrying, look into the proper ways to carry "heavy"
things. Ie, don't bend over and force your back to lift him, use your
legs instead to lift him, etc.. I found that by carrying him around alot
I simply got used to it.
Charlie
|
1055.2 | Now she's petite. | ALFA2::PEASLEE | | Mon Nov 27 1995 10:51 | 14 |
| My daughter grew like a weed the first nine months and then her growth
slowed considerably. She had been off the charts for height and around
the 70% percentile for weight. Now at 16 months she wears the same
clothes she wore last winter. She really hasn't grown much at all.
She is wearing primarily 2T.
Now she is at the 80% for height and the 25% for weight and someone
called her petite the other day.
I am told that usually breastfed babies are big for their age the first
nine months and then formula fed babies catch up at about a year.
Your son's growth rate will most likely slow down by one year.
Nancy
|
1055.3 | enjoy it | STOWOA::SPERA | | Mon Nov 27 1995 11:10 | 19 |
| I'm hoping he's not too plump, just big. Get hime moving around in baby
exercise programs so that he can develop crawling and walking skills.
Enjoy it. He's healthy. I just heard about a little one undergoing
surgery because he can't keep food down and is not gaining weight.
As for clothes, I remember loving the ones with the very long cuffs;
fold them over and then let them down. So long as he can move
comfortably in the clothes, they are not too big...so buy big and ask
everyone you know for hand-me downs. It is what got us through.
My daughter went from 8 1/2 pounds to 15 pounds in 2 months. I had a
long conversation with a cousin about how not to shrink clothes when
drying...It never occurred to me she was actually growing between
wearings. In our case it was overcoming malnutrition which caused the
growth. She eventually leveled off...wait till you have to buy shoes
and the feet grow every 2 months !
Enjoy !
|
1055.4 | | OOYES::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Mon Nov 27 1995 11:20 | 13 |
|
Another thing ... for clothes "around the house", particularly PJs ,
you can use larger kids t-shirts and that sort of stuff, more as a
"dress" to help provide another layer.
Jonathan's 2, and doesn't have a lot of pjs that keep him warm, or
sometimes he's just running a little chilly - I take 1 of his older
brother's t-shirts, right over his other pjs, and it works GREAT! And
they all think it's cute too. And in a few years, he wears them for
regular shirts.
They get old so FAST!!!
|
1055.5 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Mon Nov 27 1995 12:00 | 17 |
|
My daughter was always wearing clothes made for kids twice
her age, for quite a while. I remember now how fast she grew
out of her clothes. I bought a lot of overalls, since they
seemed to fit her for a longer period of time. I bought her
clothes a bit big and I rolled up the sleeves and legs. Here
in the US, one can find toddler clothes for ages 1 thru 4
(1T - 4T), so a big baby can still looks like a baby, not an
older kid. When I had to pick her up or hold her for a long time,
I made sure that my posture was correct, eg. bending at the knees
instead of at the waist. My daughter did slimmed down substantially
after she started walking and running. At 10, she is still tall,
but she is of normal weight now.
Eva
|
1055.6 | .....and still growing | PESTO::UMBRELLO | | Mon Nov 27 1995 15:32 | 30 |
| My son Corey has always been a larger-than-average boy. Currently, he is
19 months old and 34 lbs. He has basically been 75% for height and 90%
for weight, but at his 18 month check-up his height went up to the 90%
range.
Luckily, my sister has been giving me tons of clothes that her son had
outgrown which has been my saving grace since he has also grown out of
the different sizes very quickly. He is now into size 2T. Sometimes
the pants or sleeves are a little long, but I just roll them up. Buy sizes
bigger than he needs so that they do end up lasting longer! You might also
want to try "used clothes" stores. Sometimes you can get some very nice
clothes fairly cheap.
My son has always looked older for his age, but I do try sticking with
overalls and one-pieces that snap under the legs when possible, because I
think it does make him look younger!
As for the carrying - I find that VERY difficult. Corey is solid and I'm
7+ months pregnant, so all the more reason not to pick him up. However,
there are times when I have to pick him up. I just try to do it slowly and
to be careful. Also, at 19 months, I think Corey has built up my strength
in my back and arms, but I do try to hand him off to my husband when he
gets to be too much.
It does seem that Corey's weight has slowed down a little even though he
does eat about the same.
Good luck!
/Karen
|
1055.7 | what a friend and I did | ICS::WALKER | | Mon Nov 27 1995 17:08 | 7 |
| With Cody we haven't had to contend with weight, just height. At 2 1/2
he is in size 5's. My girlfriend's daughter, born 2 days before Cody,
had the weight issue and as suggested, BUY BIG, Cuff and tape hems.
Buy gently worn previously owned clothes and hand-stitch elastic in
spots. With my friends daughter, we took folds in lengths of sleves and
basted ribbons over the fold. We also basted elastec onto the sides of
bigger outfits to pull the waist in.....etc.
|
1055.8 | About the back... | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Mon Nov 27 1995 17:47 | 36 |
|
Proper lifting and holding is incredibly important for your body and
back. When my son was 6 months old I started physical therapy for
6 months. In labor he really knocked my sacrum and several related
areas out of whack and I could barely walk or hold him. In addition to
working my body back to shape the physical therapists spent a considerable
amount of time teaching me how to use my body with Alex. He was 90th
percentile in weight til around 15 months and then he stopped gaining
and just grew in height, as others have already mentioned their kids did.
The key things I learned from physical therapy were: it didn't matter
that I'm 5'7" and I "used" to be in great shape, my back can be ruined
just as quickly as the petite woman. I learned not to hold him on 1 hip or
the other. If I do, I only do it for very short times and then switch.
Best is to clutch him to you in the front of your body. I realize it's
a bit awkward sometimes and you still have to be careful you have your
pelvis in the "pelvic tilt". Bend your legs when picking him up. When I
pick him up I try to feel it in my thighs, bum and arms. Not my back. This
is great exercise too. They said big danger places are picking the child up
from the crib and taking out of the car. These situations make it easy
to actually be (incorrectly) holding the baby more at arms length and
you will automatically use your back. When lifting always try to keep the
baby as close to your body as possible. This might mean you kneel or
do it in a two stage process. Another really important thing is to
strengthen the stomach muscles. If you haven't been exercising
gradually and gently do crunches and other stomach exercises. Stengthening
the legs and bum would also help..and arms too.
Even saying all this there are times now (Alex is 29 months) on a
Sunday night or after a long weekend my lower back is absolutely killing me.
I'm really trying not to carry him as much any more but I like the
contact as much as he does.
Kathy
|
1055.9 | Car seat too small too. | WMOIS::PINEAU_C | | Tue Nov 28 1995 13:58 | 16 |
| I too have a big boy. He's 2yr10mth and 39lbs (although he's been
39lbs since spring so he is "slimming down" I guess).
His car seat is my biggest pain. This because here in New England, the
weather is getting colder and the layers of clothes make it almost
impossible to fit him in his booster car seat (can't fit in the full
one at all anymore). With the coat and soon the snow pants, there's no
way he'll be sitting in the seat.
Anyone know the legal age to have a young child directly in a seatbelt
in New Hampshire?
Although he won't be able to see out the windows, at least he will be
more comfortable.
Chris
|
1055.10 | What we did.. | ENGPTR::ANDERSON | There's no such place as far away | Tue Nov 28 1995 14:05 | 10 |
| I believe the N.H. age for seatbelts is 4 yrs old.
Does your booster seat have a shield that can be removed? Our booster
seat had an arm that went accross the child's lap. You could change
which side the arm opened on, or remove it all together when the child
reached a certain age/weight. We used it without the arm for a while to
keep the shoulder belt from hitting Russell in the neck. I think he
was about 3 at the time.
marianne
|
1055.11 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | runs with scissors | Tue Nov 28 1995 14:41 | 7 |
| Colorado is 4 years of 40 pounds.
My lightweight Carrie fit in the seat comfortably to age six, but she
didn't break 40 pounds until she was 5 1/2. Once she started
Kindergarten we took her out of the seat.
|
1055.12 | 4 Years/40lbs/40inches | SALES::SIMMONS | | Tue Nov 28 1995 15:21 | 5 |
| I just asked this question at the Pedi's office too. I also have a
light weight. 5 Years, 37 lbs. They told me that their guide line is
4 years, 40 lbs, or 40 inches. Preferrably meeting 2 out of three of
these. This is in Mass.
|
1055.13 | | OOYES::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Tue Nov 28 1995 15:27 | 17 |
| I just read an article that really shocked me ....
In NH, until age 4, they must be in some type of child seat (car seat,
booster, etc).
Must be buckled until age 12. (I think it's '12 and under').
There are some booster seats that only have the bottom part, and allow
you to use the regular seat belt across their waist, and the seat belt
feeds through the booster a little. I think I've seen them at JC
Penny. We also used to have one that the shield piece was adjustable.
Chris used it till he was 5, without a problem.
I think the problem is that they're too short for the belt to fit
across the hips properly.
-Patty
|
1055.14 | did I miss something? | MPGS::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Tue Nov 28 1995 15:55 | 8 |
| Patty,
I don't understand... what part "really shocked" you? I'm in Mass.,
and while I don't remember the cutoff for seat/booster, we have
the same seatbelt requirement as NH. It's always seemed reasonable
to me.
Leslie
|
1055.15 | | OOYES::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Tue Nov 28 1995 15:57 | 11 |
|
I think what "really shocked me" was that I somehow had convinced
myself over the years that the age was around 2-3 .... four just seemed
REALLY old to require a booster seat (till you take a good look at how
short a 4 yr old is! (-:).
... and because I don't think that Jason was in a booster till he was
4, which means, aside from him being in danger, I was breaking the law
without even knowing it. Hmmmmmmm - I WISH I could remember!!!
-Patty
|
1055.16 | | MPGS::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Tue Nov 28 1995 16:41 | 12 |
| :-D Yup, I think Alex had the booster seat up *to* age 5, maybe
beyond, but the chief reason was to get her up high enough a) to see
out the windows :-} and b) for the shoulder seatbelts to fit right.
I remember Marlboro had one or two seatbelt-safety-frenzy days, where
the police had a virtual roadblock on Main Street, checking all cars.
I don't think in general they can pull you over JUST to look at
seatbelts, but if you have a taillight out and you get pulled over for
that, then they can fine you or whatever if the kids are "loose". (Our
rule, though, is that the car doesn't roll if even one person is not
buckled in. [Grandma is not fond of this rule.])
Leslie
|
1055.17 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | runs with scissors | Tue Nov 28 1995 17:13 | 14 |
| Patty,
don't worry about it too much. When Lolita was little there were few
if any child restraints and they were very expensive. There were no
laws about belting children in either. She road on the floor of the
passenger's seat in a laundry basket until she was big enough to fit
into one of the gawd awful "safety seats" of that time, and then only
for long distances. Amazing she got through life with only one scar
from hitting the dashboard.
Carrie and Atlehi never have had the chance to experience that variety
of physics they are always restrained in vehicles.
meg
|
1055.18 | | STAR::LOWFAT::DIETER | | Wed Nov 29 1995 08:18 | 30 |
|
switching back to the original topic...
My son, too, was 26 pounds by his first birthday. Last week
he turned 16 months and is still 26 pounds, so his growth does
appear to have slowed (perhaps because he has begun walking or
perhaps because he has been sick on and off this fall). Unlike
my daughter who was walking at 11 months, he only started walking
about a month ago, at 15 months. I have not had back problems
from carrying him, but am having feet problems -- falling arches.
(Any suggestions on how to make falling arches less painful are
greatly appreciated. I have already tried inserts. Anyone know
any good stretches?) Like a previous noter said, I was surprised
by this because I am a runner and generally consider myself in
good shape.
As far as clothes, I have found that pants & shirts are a
better buy than overalls or one piece outfits. This is because
my son quickly outgrows the maximum height that the one piece
outfit/overalls allow. With pants, even if they are a little
short, he can still wear them comfortably.
Likewise, I have found that pants without elastic around the
ankles are a better buy. Firstly, you can buy them big and
easily turn up the cuffs until he grows into them. Secondly,
they don't crawl up his leg (to just under his knee) as he is
growing out of them -- they just look a little short, as opposed
to looking like knickers.
Mary
|
1055.19 | feet and boosters | STAR::LEWIS | | Wed Nov 29 1995 10:51 | 19 |
| re: .18
>>from carrying him, but am having feet problems -- falling arches.
>>(Any suggestions on how to make falling arches less painful are
I asked my doctor about this. He suggested that I have the shoe
store put in real arch supports (sometimes called cookies) instead
of the store-bought Dr. Scholl ones. He said I had plantar fascitis --
I'm not sure if that translates to fallen arches. I've found that
Alec's Shoe store in downtown Nashua does a great job on those arch
supports (at $1 extra per shoe) -- they even put them in my Nike
run/walk shoes.
re: Boosters for tall kids
My second son is tall too, so at 2 1/2 I put him in a Century Breverra
toddler booster. It's the high back kind. For now, the car seat belt
goes through the seat, then the child goes in a T-shield restraint (I
think the new ones have a 5-point restraint). When he outgrows the
shield, you can use the seat to raise the kid to use a shoulder
harness.
|
1055.20 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | Revive us, Oh Lord | Wed Nov 29 1995 15:15 | 12 |
|
I had plantar fascitis beginning at the very very end of
my pregnancy. It lasted until Andrew was about nine months
old, which, coincidentally, is the common duration of that
injury. It feels like a pull in the arch, close the wear
the heal starts. Mine was usually more painful in the morning,
or when first trying to walk after sitting for a while. I'll
try to remember to look up remedies/suggestions in my books
tonight, in case that is what you are suffering from.
Karen
|
1055.21 | Here's my story .... | OOYES::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Thu Nov 30 1995 15:37 | 33 |
|
I had plantar fascitis a while back as well (not pregnancy related),
and is one of those things I'll never forget ....
The Dr said it's normally caused by excessive pressure to the arch area
- seen a lot in painters or anyone who stands on ladders frequently. I
happened to be sawing boards, and was stepping on the board to hold it
still.
The symptoms for me, were extreme pain 1st thing in the morning, or
after resting for a longer period of time, gradually decreasing as the
day went on.
The remedy was to take anti-inflammatories (at the time, Motrin was
still prescrip, and what they gave me), regardless of how the foot
felt, for a week solid, try to do stretching exercises *A LITTLE* (too
much exasperates it), and try to not sit for too long, without walking
around.
The problem is that there are (probably more, but at least) two layers
of muscle in the bottom of your foot. There's a muscle that runs from
your heel area, to around the ball of your foot. Your arch muscle is
over that muscle, and runs more at an angle. The injury is in the
heel-to-ball-of-foot muscle, when it becomes strained, and swollen. As
you rest, muscles contract, so the arch muscle is then literally
pushing on the underlying heel-to-ball muscle, and that's what causes
the pain. It took about 2 weeks for this to completely go away, after
I saw the Dr. And about a week before I went to the Dr.
AND it taught me to never use any strength on the "arch" part of my
foot - use the heel or ball instead. Seems to work for me ....
|
1055.22 | | STAR::LOWFAT::DIETER | | Fri Dec 01 1995 08:33 | 14 |
|
> The symptoms for me, were extreme pain 1st thing in the morning, or
> after resting for a longer period of time, gradually decreasing as the
> day went on.
yes, this is exactly what I am feeling. I think mine was caused by
a combination of carrying my son and running > 10 miles a week... but
I haven't been running now for weeks. It is interesting that the foot
that hurts the most is the on the same side that I ususally hold my son.
Perhaps it is time to see the doctor. For a while there, I had thought
this was all in my mind as it always goes away after walking around.
thanks for the help,
Mary
|
1055.23 | | OOYES::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Fri Dec 01 1995 12:58 | 22 |
|
I'm sure there are other symptoms, but the real "clincher" for this
diagnosis, was that the pain subsided the longer you were using it.
This is because (did I say this?) the overlapping muscle loosens and
stretches out, putting less pressure on the underlying injured muscle.
Warm and cool alternating foot soaks helped a lot. Warm first, to
relax the muscle, then cool, the help take down the swelling. Do that
first thing in the morning, will probably help a lot. And wearing
slippers or loose shoes helped too.
Good Luck!! And if you do go the "motrin" route, you have to KEEP
taking them, because the anti-inflammatory works best at a constant
level in your system, and takes a couple doses to be really effective,
and you want to KEEP that effectiveness. Double check with your Dr,
but I've always been told this for anything that's on the more
"serious" side, involving swelling.
You HAVE to rest it in short spurts, and keep things loose ... good
luck!
Patty
|
1055.24 | | CSC32::A_STEINDEL | | Tue Dec 12 1995 18:24 | 17 |
| I just got back in the notesfile to read this, and yes I can certainly
understand the difficulties of large babies. Both of mine were 10 1/2
lbs and grew like mad. One is 14 and the other is 14 months. Buy cheap
clothes and around a year old you can put them in 2 piece outfits that
will work longer than the one piece. My baby is not on the charts for
height and weight -his nickname is McMoose, and the older one is
pushing 6' 3" at 14. Its real hard to carry large babies, but I have
seen a waist pack that is designed for the babies weight to rest on
while the parent carries the baby on their side. I've seen them in
one of those childrens magazines-wish I kept it. It will get easier
soon, they will be more mobile, walking, and will need carrying less
often. It is too bad products for babies are made for a small size
range when so many more babies are getting bigger and bigger every
year! Good luck....
-Adrienne
|
1055.25 | New car seat ! | WMOIS::PINEAU_C | | Wed Dec 27 1995 10:11 | 8 |
| I just purchased the Century Breverra Toddler booster seat at Service
Merchandise in Manchester NH. It has the 5 pt restraint system as
noted in prior notes. It was on sale for 44.97 - great price (all
carseats over $50.00 are $15.00 off - FYI).
Andrew had a very comfortable ride this morning. Thanks for the tips!!
Chris
|
1055.26 | ex | MROA::DUPUIS | | Wed Dec 27 1995 10:36 | 9 |
| I have a question regarding the Breverra, can it be used in the front
seat. I thought it could, as long as you didn't have the automatic
seat belts, but my boyfriend is saying that he thought that kids were
not allowed in the front in car seats that face the front. I don't
know where he comes up with these things, but thought I'd give him the
benefit of the doubt and ask in here......
Thanks,
Roberta
|
1055.27 | ???not sure | WMOIS::PINEAU_C | | Wed Dec 27 1995 11:15 | 6 |
| I don't think the box indicates that the seat should not be used in the
front. Personally, I like having Andrew in the back. He's too grabby
and having him in the front would be a field day for him - radio,
shifter, glove compartment....all with in a close reach.
Chris
|
1055.28 | | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Wed Dec 27 1995 12:52 | 9 |
| Roberta,
It is generally considered unsafe to have the child in the
front seat. I know there are various strings in here that
go over that subject at great length.
They say the safest place is the middle of the back seat.
cj *->
|
1055.29 | | OOYES::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Tue Jan 02 1996 11:37 | 23 |
| Roberta,
The "law" only regards that the child must be restrained - it doesn't
indicate where they may/maynot sit (by your boyfriend's theory, a kid
would never be allowed in your average pickup!)
You cannot use a seat facing-rear, in the front seat, if the car has a
passenger-side airbag, because the airbag may force the child into the
back of the seat, causing more injury. If the airbag didn't go off,
all else would be the same as a car without one.
As indicated, the SAFEST place to ride, for resistance to impact, is
the center of the backseat. In my case, if it's just me and Jonathan,
it's MUCH safer for him to ride upfront. When he's in the back, I find
myself trying to reach/look back to deal with him, and that makes me a
much less safe driver....
The only other issue that I know of, with the front, would be the
seatbelt style, but that's getting to be an issue in the back too with
the shoulder straps in the rear seats as well. i.e., I have 5 belts in
my car, and only 1 is not the automatic-type. (center rear).
|