T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1031.1 | | NOTAPC::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Thu Oct 05 1995 15:49 | 17 |
| No help on the workbook question, but a thought...
Coupling this question with the ongoing topic on boredom that started
recently, it might be worth thinking about doing your own problems...
use real life situations - gardening, remodeling, budgets, cooking,
etc to present problems with meaning.
btw, I'm not sure about repetition or not, personally. I mean, do I
want to teach rote memorization, or problem solving techniques? Maybe
a little of both, but its a balance, that's for sure. I mean, it
might still be worth memorizing addition and multiplication tables at
an early age, but I'm undecided with regards to rows and rows of
similar problems...
fwiw,
- Tom
|
1031.2 | | PLUGH::needle | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Fri Oct 06 1995 11:24 | 8 |
| A place that might have good advice is the home-ed mailing list. To
subscribe, send a message to [email protected] with
subscribe home-ed <your internet address>
in the body of the message.
j.
|
1031.3 | CTY/EPGY Distance Learning Program | USDEV::PISAREVSKAYA | | Fri Oct 06 1995 13:06 | 17 |
| Check out: http://www.jhu.edu:80/~gifted/
and
http://www.jhu.edu:80/~gifted/acadprog/dlp.html
or write to:
The Johns Hopkins University
Institute for the Academic Advancement of Youth (IAAY)
3400 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21218
for information on CTY and Distance Learning Project.
If you have any specific questions, feel free to contact me.
Yelena
|
1031.4 | Take a look at a book called Family Math | DECWET::WOLFE | | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:25 | 4 |
| It has a number of projects for doing at
home. It also outlines what it might take
to do a "family math" night at you local
school.
|
1031.5 | | NETCAD::BRANAM | Steve, Hub Products Engineering, LKG2-2, DTN 226-6043 | Mon Oct 30 1995 12:44 | 49 |
| What about some of the math educational software like Math Blaster? I've never
actually looked at it, but I knew someone whose son really loved it. He was
about 7 or 8 years old. There are also many other programs to teach math,
although many are probably oriented to the student who needs some motivation, as
opposed to the motivated student who craves more.
Personally, I never needed heavy repetition until calculus. This was nice in
that I got through new topics in math quickly, but left me totally unprepared
for dealing with calculus. I didn't succeed with it until I took my math
teacher's half-joking "Do a hundred integrals over the weekend" seriously. Of
course, that's a far cry from third-grade math.
It sounds like you want a Schaum's series for elementary math. I don't know if
there is such a thing, but that is their approach for high school and college
math: several pages of the same type of problem to work on a single concept.
I think the math club is a great idea, because your real alternative is to get
creative. You become the teacher and push your child (then you will have to deal
with his frustration at having to do the "baby stuff" at school!). If he seems
to be especially good at creative solutions, you should really exercise this,
because it is a godsend. Most kids have problems because they don't seek
creative solutions. They just stick with the one way they have learned, and have
difficulty applying it to variant situations. Start looking for books that
require this type of thinking. Martin Gardner, Scientific American's math
puzzler, has published several such books, though I'm not sure if any are for
elementary age. There are also several books on "lateral thinking," where you
very deliberately take a different approach to a problem, sometimes bizarre, but
always creative.
Taking the lessons-from-life approach, you can look at how math is applied in
the real world and make up some problems to work. Construction is probably a
good one for this age (measuring up lumber for a doghouse to minimize waste,
calculating the amount of concrete to fill an odd-shaped hole, etc.). This also
very quickly gets into compound fractions, typically a big math hurdle for
people. Then you can actually build some of the things, or models of them, and
check out the work. The world of physics offers lots of opportunities. Leaving
the derivation of equations for later, there are lots of simple equations to
work with and actually demonstrate in real life. This introduces powers, roots,
and variables. Simple machines like levers and pulleys are also fun, especially
since you can very easily build working models to play with. I've always been a
big fan of the hands-on approach where you get to try things out for real. Try a
few of these out, find out where he bogs down and work those topics a bit, and
press on!
Ever watch Bill Nye, Newton's Apple, or Beakman's World? These programs take an
interactive experimental approach to science, most of it requiring math of some
type. Do some of the things they show, or use some of the topics they cover.
They may not discuss the math, but that's where you can pick it up.
|
1031.6 | | NETCAD::BRANAM | Steve, Hub Products Engineering, LKG2-2, DTN 226-6043 | Wed Nov 01 1995 12:48 | 5 |
| BTW, just what math *is* a third-grader supposed to know or be ready for? I went
to Montessori school until 5th grade, so I'm not sure what the public school
curriculum for that age is like (especially since that was a quarter-century
ago!). Is it just multiple-place addition and subtraction? Multiplication and
long division? Fractions? Decimals?
|
1031.7 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:34 | 32 |
|
> Personally, I never needed heavy repetition until calculus. This was nice in
> that I got through new topics in math quickly, but left me totally unprepared
> for dealing with calculus. I didn't succeed with it until I took my math
> teacher's half-joking "Do a hundred integrals over the weekend" seriously. Of
> course, that's a far cry from third-grade math.
Hmmmm, that's the opposite of my experience. I think there's value
in being able to perform basic math quickly, which for me required
repetition (and I never did get that fast with it). As opposed to
something like calculus, which is more conceptual, and where it
helped me much more to understand what the hell's behind it all
(differential, rate of change; integral, area under function, etc.)
than the methodology (show me how to do one of each type, and the
rest all follow the same). Of course it matters whether your teacher
was giving you speed tests versus word problems... ;-)
> BTW, just what math *is* a third-grader supposed to know or be ready for? I went
> to Montessori school until 5th grade, so I'm not sure what the public school
> curriculum for that age is like (especially since that was a quarter-century
> ago!). Is it just multiple-place addition and subtraction? Multiplication and
> long division? Fractions? Decimals?
It's not too advanced (sadly). Entering 3rd grade, little or no long
division, fractions, decimals. Add, subtract, multiply, and basic
whole-integer division. This is from recent experience with public
schools. I have no memory of what we (I) did; 1st through 8th is a
long-forgotten blur...
Glenn W.
|