T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
945.1 | Keep Fido out! | ALFA2::PEASLEE | | Thu Apr 27 1995 14:00 | 8 |
| I think you handled the situation *very* well. Pets do not belong in play
areas, in my opinion. Children will be crawling, walking rolling
around etc and they shouldn't have to worry about pet droppings.
A dog on the seesaw??? I can't even picture something like that.
She was out of line.
Nancy
|
945.2 | | NOTAPC::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Thu Apr 27 1995 15:20 | 6 |
| Not to mention the fact that even the smallest, gentlest dog can be
intimidating to some kids... or what about allergies... there are too
many possible issues that would be avoided by leaving the pets at
home...
- Tom
|
945.3 | Sanitary? | HOTLNE::CORMIER | | Thu Apr 27 1995 15:33 | 11 |
| I agree about dogs in general. However, do you have any idea how many
stray cats find that playground to be one HUGE litter box : ) To me
it's not so much the sanitary issue as it is one of comfort to the
children. Most kids, even if they have a pet dog, are leary of strange
dogs and probably wouldn't enjoy themselves if they had to keep a close
eye on a one while they played. Not a fun time.
I have 3 dogs myself, and I wouldn't trust them around a busy
playground. They might get agitated with all the fast movement and
loud noise coming from strange children. Perfect timing for a
fear-bite!
Sarah
|
945.4 | Post the rules? | MSBCS::MIDTTUN | Lisa Midttun,223-1714,MLO5-5 M/S E71 | Thu Apr 27 1995 15:55 | 4 |
| Just a quick aside...Are rules/ownership posted anywhere near the
playground? Might fend off future problems....(I remember similar signs
on high school tennis courts which were usable by public under certain
guidelines/constraints)....Might help.
|
945.5 | | SHRCTR::JPALMASON | | Thu Apr 27 1995 16:10 | 7 |
| I am on the playground committee in Littleton, and we are working on
putting up a sign with rules stated in a positive manner. One of them
will be "Please leave your pets at home." I don't think it's been a
problem to date, but this also helps with liability issues if there were
ever an accident where a dog bit a child.
Julie
|
945.6 | some clarifications | SALES::DONCHIN | | Thu Apr 27 1995 17:05 | 37 |
| Some clarifications:
The only children on the playground at the time of this incident were
my two and the woman's child, as the extended day children whose
parents hadn't arrived yet were taken to the late room (they are always
in the late room between 5:30 and 6 P.M. so the last wave of parents
don't have to search for their kids). I was never concerned about the
dog being dangerous to the kids (it was a golden retriever, which I've
always thought was a gentle dog)--it was it's "droppings" that worried
me!
This playground does have the typical playground sign that reads
something like "Playground is not monitored after hours--play at your
own risk" because it is located on school-owned property, even though
the playground is funded and maintained by the private extended day
program. My husband, who is a board member for the program, is going to
be calling the director for specifics on the program's
responsibilities (this is clearly an unusual situation, since it's a
privately funded playground on publically owned land). I've also suggested
to him and another board member that the board consider fencing in and
locking the playground after 6 P.M. weekdays and all weekend (based on
clarification on the program's position, of course). It won't keep out
stray cats but it would go a long way to barring dogs and limiting the
program's liability.
I'm sure this isn't the first time a dog has been brought onto the
playground, as it abuts one of the two main waterlines that serve the
Boston metropolitan area (so does my house and I've seen *many* people
using the waterline as a pet walk and a garbage dump-GRRR!). I'm just
glad I could keep one dog out one time and hope that any other parents
will do the same in the future.
Thanks.
Nancy-
|
945.7 | Our city parks are one big toilet bowl! | CSC32::G_OGLESBY | Ginny Oglesby 592-4731 CSC/CS | Thu May 04 1995 17:54 | 23 |
| This issue hits home for me. In Colorado Springs we have a leash law that
extends to the city parks. So, dogs are allowed in the parks if they
are on a leash. I apologize to those few folks who do clean up after
their dogs, but the majority of people use our city parks to "walk"
their dogs. The parks are littered with dog poop. I have to restrict
my son from playing on the grass when we go to the park, for this reason.
I have called the Parks Maintanance office, and they say that owners
are supposed to pick up droppings from their pets, but in my local
park they have yet to post this on the sign.
Recently I suggested to a man whose dog was in the porcess of pooping
right next to the swing area, that he might want to clean up the
dog poop. He became very defensive and denied that his dog and done it.
Only after I said that I saw the 'poop coming out', and he checked
the poop for 'freshness', did he take some newspaper and clean it up.
Needless to say, this ruined my entire day at the park. Somewhere
priorites have gotten mixed up. I find it very sad that I cannot
allow my son to run on the grass at the neighborhood park. The dogs
have priority there.
(fyi, I'm referring to Pinion Valley Park)
|
945.8 | | LUDWIG::RDOZOIS | justice will prevail... | Fri May 05 1995 09:34 | 10 |
| On the other side of this issue...I bring my dog to the park maybe
twice a year when I go with my girlfriend who has kids...I never let my
dog on the sand and keep to the grass and he is always leashed.
(I walk him into the woods for awhile first.) The problem I have is that
people will let there childern walk up to my dog and try to play with
him...This gets me going...I don't want people's childern coming up to
my dog tugging on him, expecting him to play etc....I keep him on a
leash for a reason...this always ruins it and we have to go home..So
try to remember that park in some city's are the only place to get
alittle freash air and relaxe...people with dogs have rights too....
|