T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
918.1 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | proud counter-culture McGovernik | Mon Mar 13 1995 13:56 | 13 |
| cj,
go with your feelings here. I would continue to have him involved in a
visit that lasts up to a couple of hours, but not overnight. She is at
the age where kids need to be in one stable place if possible because
of "stranger awareness." Explain to her father that at this point she
needs this, and that there will be time to work beyond this as she gets
older.
if you need grab a book on the birth through two years development
stages for backup.
meg
|
918.2 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Mon Mar 13 1995 15:05 | 21 |
|
re .0
I think doing overnight in a unfamiliar environment with unfamiliar
people is very stressful for a 6 month old, it is tough even for a 3
year old! It is scary for them to wake up and not see a familiar
face.
I recently made a boo-boo. I was staying at girlfriend's house while
on vacation. Her 1 year old son got used to me after a couple of days.
The fourth morning I was up early and heard the little guy cry. My
girlfriend was still sound asleep. So, I tried to find out if he needed
changing or what not. Well, he was so upset seeing me instead of his mom
that he got hysterical. Boy, did I feel bad about it. I'm glad I've
known my girlfriend since 4th grade ;-(;-(.
Trust your own instincts. You know your kid better than anybody else.
Eva
|
918.3 | Make HIM wait!! | MKOTS1::PENNELLA | | Mon Mar 13 1995 17:00 | 15 |
| My blood boiled when I read this!! My daughter is now 12 but her
father and I divorced when she was 4 months old. My scenario was the
same as yours!! How dare he think just because he cannot sit in "her"
comfort zone and hold and play with her for an hour or so, he feels he
should uproot her and take her where HE'S comfortable. PUT YOUR FOOT
DOWN and demand that he relax and enjoy her where SHE's comfortable
while she's this little!! He has the years ahead to take her,
meanwhile tell him to quit stressing the little gal just to suit his
needs!! Your concerns are natural and any good mom would feel the same
way you feel! Don't let him make you feel guilty.... even when the
weather is nice. FOLLOW YOUR GUT INSTINCT..
Best of Luck
Terri
|
918.4 | I *think* I may be right! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Mar 14 1995 08:06 | 40 |
| Whoa Terri! Reel it in there woman! :-) (just teasing)
I got a couple more replies off line to this and it seems perhaps
my feelings are founded.
You know, he really does love his daughter. I don't want to make
him sound like he's coming up to fulfill an obligation, because he
does love her. They just are not finding a common ground. I truly
feel that even when they have good nights, it's due to Angeline's
incredibly good nature. She's really something, but even she has
her moments, and he seems to be the recipient of most of them.
There is another wrench in the works. David's going to be starting
a new job in New Jersey. He'll work a four day work week, Tuesday
to Friday, and come home on Friday nights (which will turn into
Saturday mornings real quick). It seems he is figuring on coming
to my house sometime on Sunday to take Angeline so he can have her
on Mondays. Now I expect he's thinking "hey, that will save us one
day of daycare $$$". I think that is where this sleep over idea is
getting worked in. But he cannot be relied upon to do this every
week. I KNOW him. When I was pregnant, and we were still together,
he used to take off as soon as he could every Sunday because he likes
to go out on Sunday nights. Where, I have no clue, but it didn't
even matter that he worked on Monday. He will not give that up
for Angeline.
Who knows, maybe I'm way off the mark here, but I just don't think
so. He'll want to leave her with his mother, who is one unstable
nutcase, I gotta tell you. I have no intention of letting her have
unsupervised visits with Angeline for a very long time, if at all.
I don't know, there's so much at play here.... sometimes it's a
bit overwhelming.
Well, thanks for your comments. If there's any single fathers out
there, or any male opinions right now, I'd like to hear that side
of the coin too.
Thanks to you all, again
cj *->
|
918.5 | | MPGS::PHILL | In casual pursuit of serenity. | Tue Mar 14 1995 09:27 | 34 |
| cj,
I think Angeline is very lucky to have two people who love her so much.
When my daughter was living with her mother and coming to visit with me
she was much older. That time was very important to me.
You have some very strong feelings over this. That is approproriate you
are her Mother. You mentioned that Angeline really can't distinguish her father
from your friends because he's an occasional visitor. I'm not sure how he could
become any more without having Angeline for longer periods.
I understand your concerns about Angeline's fathers dependability too. When
I was first married to Rowena's (my daughter's) mother (Barbara) there were some
legal battle's over visitation between Barbara and her former husband. The court
didn't agree with us. They forced Alex who was then six (or sevenish) to take
ten hour plane rides as an unaccompanied minor to visit his Dad. As it worked
out his Dad usually arranged for another relative to be on the plane with him.
Anyway, my point here is that it is often another perspective to a situation.
The lack of dependability was there too. Alex was meant to get regularly
scheduled calls from his Dad which his father frequently missed. Alex returned
from one visit early - this was a local visit. Alex was devistated.
Anyway. Maybe you could talk to Angeline's Dad about this. Tell him how you
feel. I guess that this won't be easy. Maybe he can see your perspective and he
can begin to see yours and you can come to some common understanding.
Like the other noters said too, your instincts are important. However, if you
just follow them without talking to Angeline's father he'll just feel shut out.
I think by telling him he'll understand that you have Angeline's best interests
at heart.
I hope it all works out for Angeline.
Peter.
|
918.6 | So much help! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Mar 14 1995 10:41 | 29 |
| Peter,
You know, I have friends with older kids that I've seen the heartache
that a father (yes, and a mother) sometimes cause. I can remember
in particular a little boy sitting at the end of his driveway on
his sleeping bag crying his eyes out because Daddy no-showed for a
camping weekend. I do believe enough in David that he won't cause
immediate pain like that to Angeline later on. He is not a jerk,
I may get mad at him, but he really is not a bad man. Just perhaps
a little too young, and totally inexperienced with infants/children
for such a responsibility.
I'd like to try the approach with him that "I'm just not ready", or
"I don't have good enough feelings about this". I'd like to try not
to make it a "well, you did this" and "you did that" type of conver-
sation. The problem is, when it comes to compassion for my feelings
David falls very short of the mark. Besides, I expect the typical
answer will be "but you'll never be ready". Which is true :-), but
at a later age I think I could deal with it more. At least when
she can talk and recognize Daddy.
Well, I'll keep you all posted if you'd like. And keep those
cards and letters coming folks! :-) This is giving a bit more
confidence in that I don't feel I'm being overly protective or
smothering, but hey - if someone feels that way, please tell me.
People say things, you look at something differently, and little
lights go on... that's what a discussion is about.
cj *->
|
918.7 | | POWDML::AJOHNSTON | beannachd | Tue Mar 14 1995 11:00 | 17 |
| re.6
I think "I'm not ready" is likely a tactical error.
Keep focused upon your daughter and her needs. Not yours.
Tell him about the baby sitting/pacifier incident as an illustration of
why you feel that _she_ isn't ready to wake up in a strange place.
Encourage him to become better acquainted. And if his idea of quality
time is watching TV together, I don't know if that's such a bad thing.
I don't believe that it's ideal, but the way you describe it sounds
like the contact is there. So long as he's a loving and careful [this
needs work from reading .0] father, I really think that he, rather than
you, should determine how they spend their time together.
Annie
|
918.8 | | TLE::C_STOCKS | Cheryl Stocks | Tue Mar 14 1995 11:24 | 38 |
| I was thinking about your note on the way home last night. Other people
have already mentioned some of the things I thought of, but here are
a few more:
1. Dealing with a baby overnight without nearby backup sounds like
it's beyond his "skill level" right now. What I would worry
about would be whether the adults in the household might get
frustrated at an inconsolably crying baby and do something abusive
(maybe not realizing it could harm the baby, such as shaking).
I think this is a difficult situation for many adults to deal
with even if they have experience with babies (e.g., parents of
colicky babies).
2. Is there a way to work up to it more gradually? Can he perhaps
be responsible for her for an afternoon, including when she
wakes up from her nap, without you present, but available if he
needs help? If that doesn't go smoothly, he might see for himself
that the overnight stay wouldn't work. And if *does* work fine,
that would reassure you that the overnight could work out.
3. Does he expect to be 100% resposible for her during the time he
has her, or is he expecting someone else (girlfriend, his mother)
to be doing a lot of the care? It seems like if someone else is
taking care of her, he's not getting the "time with daughter" that
would be the point of this. (Of course, at night while everyone
is sleeping is not exactly quality time together, either!)
4. On the other hand, if he can convince you that he will be
providing a safe situation for her, I wonder whether there would
be any real damage to her even if she did wake up and get very
upset. I think the person that would be most hurt by this would
be you, separated from her and wondering what was going on,
worrying...
Good luck! It's difficult to make good decisions in a situation that,
as you say, has so many (emotional) factors involved.
cheryl
|
918.9 | My cut at it ... | CLOUD9::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Tue Mar 14 1995 11:35 | 80 |
| Hi cj!
I struggle with the same thing myself, though Jonathan is a bit older.
My sanity is reached because I TRY to base my decisions on "what's best
for Jonathan". If Al were to take Jonathan w/ him for a w/end, then
Jonathan would be 'sent downstairs' and watch tv all day, while his
half-sister (8 yrs old) watched him, or his grandmother looked in on
him. His dad would find so many other things too much more attractive
to do, and it would be too difficult for him to focus his time and
attention on Jonathan. At 18 mos old, at least Jonathan is a little
more independent, and can, in a way "speak up for himself" if he were
too neglected. But anyway, I have to ask myself (over and over and
over again), "What's best for Jonathan". And at this point in his
life, it would NOT be best for him to be left alone with his father,
where his father is currently living (at his parents').
I have a few more things to use as 'yardsticks', but basically I judge
it on several things;
o How capable is Jonathan of making his wants/needs, known?
o How likely is Jonathan to get hurt, if he's not watched, or only
watched by another kid?
o What type of time/activities does 'dad' currently spend with his
other 2 kids (they watch tv, he does what he wants, usually off in
another part of the house, or outside.)
o How will Jonathan potentially benefit from this?
o In what ways can this hurt him? (make him think that this is 'normal'
for mom/dad to just ignore a child)
o What is the long-term affect if he goes? If he doesn't go? And is
there any compromising?
o What type of time/activities does 'dad' currently do with just
Jonathan? (not much - sometimes plays ball if I tell him to,
otherwise Dad watches TV, Jonathan plays by himself until he cries)
So, for us, it's a little more 'supervised' if you will. But that's
for now, and as Jonathan gets older, and can talk more, and IF his
father shows some interest (and gets his own place), then he'll
probably end up spending more time, including overnights, with him.
For now, I'm usually there when Dad's around, and he sure doesn't seem
to mind. And I bring Jonathan to visit his
grandparents/half-brother/sister on the w/ends that Dad has the other 2
kids, so that MAYBE they can all get to know each other a bit.
Yes, Dad LOVES Jonathan .... to pieces!! But he really doesn't know
how to care for him at this age, and he doesn't seem too concerned
about learning those 40 bazillion 'little things' that Jonathan tries
to communicate.
You have a good sense of how 'attached' they are, and I think unless
you're secure that ANY 'other person' is intuned to your child, you'll
never feel comfortable. For the last 6 mos, every day we come home
from daycare, Jonathan's **ALWAYS** starving and thirsty, and he'll
whine/cry when he gets home till he gets a drink and a cracker or
something. And every time that Dad picks him up and brings him home,
he can NEVER figure out why he's whining/crying. Let's see .... for 6
mos, and he usually picks him up twice/week, and he still doesn't get
it, ... that's not someone particularly intuitive, or even tuned in to
their kids' needs. When Jonathan can ASK for what he needs, then I'll
feel better about it. (-:
Maybe you could try an approach where, if you really feel you/she is
ready for Dad's place, that you take a few 'supervised' visits to his
place, to see how she does, and see that it's safe and all that. And
if his girlfriend doesn't like it, too bad! You have a child between
the two of you, and she needs to accept that, and accept that you and
David are always (ALWAYS!) going to be involved in each other's lives,
because of Angeline.
I don't think you're wrong - but it may be hard to get him to agree to
your reasoning. Of course, if he's such a 'free person', as you
describe, then he may very well find out that he doesn't want to be
"strapped with this screaming kid!" for more than an hour or two at a
time anyway! Would it be possible to let him sleep on the couch one
night or something, and have HIM take care of her the whole time, but
you're just there "as backup"? Or you sleep on the couch at his place
(sure, that wouldn't be awkward!)?? Maybe he just needs to SEE that
it's not all simple .... ??
Good Luck!
Patty
|
918.10 | | SAPPHO::DUBOIS | Another day, another doctor | Tue Mar 14 1995 11:42 | 47 |
| There's a lot of things here I agree with. Mostly, you need to focus on
your daughter's needs, not your own. It's never going to be easy having her
go to her father's for the first time overnight. Not for many, many years
anyway. Therefore, there are three things I would suggest:
1) Find a time which would minimize the problems.
If she is going through "stranger anxiety" at this age (the really
horrible stage, not just the kind that is always there) then wait
until she is over it. If she is not going through "stranger
anxiety" now, try to get her to her father's before she starts it.
It often starts later than 6 months (8 months or so, for ours, as I
recall).
2) Reduce the problems that you see, as best as you can.
Lend him a baby monitor so that her crying will sound like it's in
the same room. Make sure he knows simple safety rules, like keeping
up the sides of the crib. Teach him distraction tricks to do with her
when she is crying, so that she stops crying while still feeling loved.
Do whatever else you can to help with the other problems which you see,
especially those related to safety. It is in your daughter's best
interests that you help her father learn to take care of her better.
Lastly:
3) If he is disinclined to learn how to keep her safe, then document all
concerns you have, and how you have tried to help, and what he has
done or not done.
Sooner or later, as her father, he can get support from a judge to
have her over at his house. If you still think that it is a safety
risk to have him keep her overnight, it will help your cause if you
have kept a log a) of the problems you have seen, b) your attempts to
teach him proper safety rules, c) his lack of keeping these rules
even after being taught). Be nice when you teach him, by the way.
Let him know you are on *his* side, or rather, that you are both on
your daughter's side. The two of you can work together for her
happiness.
Good luck. I hope that he learns better care of her. I am happy for her,
though, that 1) he cares about her enough to want to spend more time with her,
and 2) that he cares enough about her to visit her every week (he's not the
only one who finds babies boring a lot of time), and 3) that he has control of
his temper enough to put her in the crib when he is angry. Though it would
break my heart, too, to know my baby was left to cry, it is still a wise thing
for him to do if he is very angry, and far better than hitting her, which some
parents would do. His is a good coping mechanism for now, and as I mentioned,
he just may not know some of the tricks of parenting that you have learned
and can share with him.
Carol
|
918.11 | This is really helping! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Mar 14 1995 11:59 | 41 |
| Patty,
You had some valid points. One thing in his favor, Angeline is
really not a screaming kid. She very rarely cries, just gets
up a little cranky sometimes. Oh yeah, I'm forgetting my own
concerns....the most crying she does is when he's over and I go
out. Yup, hence a crying child...
I think what I would like to do is ask he come stay over a couple
(few?) times and spend an evening/morning/whole day caring for her.
When I he broke up with me we made an agreement that he would come
stay with me on weekends until I delivered. My mom was around on
week days, but weekends I was alone. I didn't feel in my last
few weeks I should be alone like that, with him an hour away. I
also requested he stay with me the first two weeks after Angeline
was born to help me out (not even knowing at the time that I'd
wind up with a Cesarean). He wound up pretty much agreeing to
my terms. There was a couple weekends he wanted to go home, and
I was flexible on that. So, to give a very long answer to your
question, I believe it possible he can come stay. He was going
with this girl since before he broke up with me, so she's already
gone through his staying over my place. Besides, she is not a
factor in this at all as far as I'm concerned.
I will have to sit him down and bring up all the concerns I've
mentioned here. That's come through clear to me from everyone's
input. It just gets hard, because he gets so defensive and we
wind up fighting and not listening. He takes things as an accusation,
and I'm struggling over words to "soften the blows" and trying not
to sound accusatory. Hmmm....I wonder if I could ever get him to
a mediator? With him moving to New Jersey, scheduling that would
be next to impossible. But I just may consider it if we can't work
through this amicably. With such a long, hard, hurtful, road we've
come down, I bet some counseling would be beneficial.
cj *->
I think when the time comes, this will be my suggestion. I don't
feel it will sway him, ie: seeing how tough it is and not taking
her overnight, but may help me to build a little more confidence
in him.
|
918.12 | the library can help | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Tue Mar 14 1995 12:26 | 11 |
| .11> It just gets hard, because he gets so defensive and we wind up
> fighting and not listening. He takes things as an accusation,
> and I'm struggling over words to "soften the blows" and trying not
> to sound accusatory.
Deborah Tannen's books (_You_Just_Don't_Understand_ and [I think]
_That's_Not_What_I_Meant_) can probably help you with phrasing things
so that he really hears what you're saying without feeling it as a
personal attack.
Leslie
|
918.13 | Yes, I'm still going on here... | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Mar 14 1995 12:35 | 78 |
| re. 10
Carol,
Ah the monitor! This brings back my feeling of how deeply he
sleeps. When he's over, and I'm out, and he puts her to bed,
he has the monitor there beside him. He is sleeping through
"things". He's certainly sleeping through my coming in the
house and going in her room.
Now, she's getting bigger, even I am getting less anxiety ridden
when she's in bed. That is, I probably don't check to see if
she's breathing every ten minutes (seconds, nanoseconds... :-) ).
I do wake up at her every noise, but will generally lay there waiting
to see if she finds her pacifier by herself, or waiting to see if she
goes back to sleep. With all this aside, I am up tending to her
probably two or three times a night. Is it the end of her world if
she winds up crying back to sleep because she can't find the pacifier
herself, and he doesn't awaken? No it isn't. But I have awoken to
her making a weird coughing noice and found, and pulled out, a corner
of her receving blanket she has swallowed so deep she was choking.
Yes, it's incidents like that that run through my head when I
envision her sleeping over. Yes, it could happen at any time to
anyone, but less safe when you can sleep through a world war.
I don't help myself much with those thoughts, do I? Well having
him stay over and seeing if he does awake when needed, will do a
lot for me.
Also, some of you have brought out the suggestions of trying to
teach him the little tricks to his daughter. I tried that so much
when she was first born, ie: she really like to be rocked, she gets
kind of upset when you cradle her, she likes to be up on your shoulder,
etc.... Anything I suggested he would ignore and most determindly do
what he wanted. I felt like he wanted to establish things "he" did
with her. Maybe so she'd associate these things with Daddy and these
things with Mommy. Life was hell, I'll tell you! She was miserable.
But then I found him slowly doing the things she liked, mostly when
I wasn't around. But I come home and find them in the rocker (which
he never liked before because he can't lay down while watching t.v.
and holding her). He started putting her up on his shoulder to quiet
her. Little things started evolving.
Now he's gotten a little more receptive to my suggestions. I think
because a) I just stopped making them after a while, and b) he saw
she didn't like him much. There are times when I see a stone wall
go up when I try to start telling him something new she likes, but
he comes around. I expect even some if the most happiest, married
couples/parents go through the same things.
"Focusing" on my daughter's needs rather than my own is what caused
me to start this whole discussion. I have been unsure if my point
of view was being clouded by my emotions. I see now I do have some
valid points, but should work WITH them rather than use them as a
weapon to try stopping the inevitable.
One other thing I'd like a little feedback on. The girlfriend (boo!).
I hate the thought, but I feel I should meet her before Angeline spends
much time up there. She's already gone and spent one afternoon at
Daddy's, but it was only for two or three hours. I think if this
starts getting regular, it would be irresponsible for me not to have
met this girl. No, I am not trusting in David's judgement of her
because of a lot of the specifics of this whole mess. And me spending
an hour around her is not going to tell me if she's going to suffocate
my kid the first chance she gets. But do you think I should bite the
bullet and meet this girl? Isn't it a "must" at this point?
You know, I have to laugh at myself here. All this agonizing! Well
actually, I'm not "agonizing", I'm just trying to be sure whatever I
do is fair and not attempts at being a b*tch. I don't want to make
mistakes and destroy what is already a very fragile relationship
between her father and I.
So what do you think? Meet the girl? (sometimes I think I must
be sounding like a total woosh to you folks, but this is really
helping me).
cj *->
|
918.14 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | Oh me of little faith | Tue Mar 14 1995 13:22 | 17 |
|
Just a comment on "teaching" Dad.
While I wholeheartedly agree that safety specifics need to
be a taught, I have found through experience that we Mom's
don't always know the best way or the only way to comfort
or care for a baby.
I used to harp on my husband to do things my way. Somewhere
early in the process I realized that he was capable of figuring
things out on his own (and less fed up with my harping ;-)).
On matters of safety, I did persist,
and usually would back up my requests with statistics ("Did you
know umpteen kids die per year from XYZ and it's a risk I'd
rather not take with our child" for example).
Karen
|
918.15 | | POWDML::AJOHNSTON | beannachd | Tue Mar 14 1995 13:30 | 8 |
| re. 13
If this the woman friend has been around since before Angeline was
born, I think meeting her might be in order. I can certainly see where
that would feel pretty "ick," but, if it were me, I'd want to meet
someone who would likely be spending some time around my child.
Annie
|
918.16 | If she's important to David, she'll be imp. to Angeline | cloud9.zko.dec.com::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Tue Mar 14 1995 13:57 | 33 |
| cj,
I think you should meet her .... even if it's only to decide she's
capable and you hate her anyway. (that'd probably be the worst) You
may find out you like her, and MAY even find an ally in her, and in
raising your daughter. If David's that "numb", it may make you feel
better to know that there's someone 'in the house' who WOULD wake up if
Angeline started crying .... even if it isn't the person who's supposed
to be taking care of her.
THIS would be one of my biggest struggles -- letting the "other woman"
care for your child. I think that's a lot harder to separate emotion
from fact, but again, try to ask yourself the same questions. If David
decided that this woman will be part of his life, then she's part of
Angeline's life too, and you all need to get along - no matter how
awful it can be.
I would love for Jonathan to be able to spend more time w/ his 1/2
brother and sister (from his father's side), but 'the ex' and I have
never gotten along, and SHE certainly would never want a child of MINE
at her house, so it's not much of an issue ... but if it were
different, I'm not sure that I'd feel great to allow him to go off
'with her' (we'll ignore the fact that she's a psycho-path and came at
me w/ a knife...). I think it's probably one of the hardest things
about 'split' families - is later on being able to include all of the
'extended' family, for the benefit of the child.
The girlfriend will NEVER replace you, but she may be able to give your
daughter some attention while she's "with her dad".
Good luck! I don't envy your position!!
|
918.17 | No "harping" allowed | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Mar 14 1995 14:20 | 31 |
| re .14
Karen,
In my own defense, I have taken special pains not to "harp"
on David. At best, my suggestions have been made while he's
holding her, she's screaming, and I've said, in a kind of
"sharing" tone, "I've found she likes being up on your shoulder
more than being held down (cradle)". Mind you, this is in
response to "why is she crying???". And I got ignored. That
is why I said I just stopped suggestions. When asked "why is
she crying" I'd wind up just shrugging my shoulders and saying
"I don't know" and left it up to them to figure out how to get
happier with each other. That was tough too, because I knew
how to make her stop.
As I said, now he's just a bit more open to suggestion. If
he asks, I answer and more now he follows my suggestion. Most
of the time they are not unsolicited suggestions. In fact,
most of the time I get the heck out of the house when he comes
because I couldn't stand seeing my daughter so unhappy. But
hey, there's times when I get home at night and want to just
stay there. Sometimes those times fall on his night over.
I usually spend them sitting in my room, or folding laundry
in the bathroom because she behaves better for him if she
doesn't see me. I laugh saying this too, because last time
he was down, I fell asleep on the bathroom floor on a pile
of towels. Don't ask me how, guess I just wanted to "rest my
eyes" a bit :-).
cj *->
|
918.18 | | SHRCTR::DJANCAITIS | Americas MCS Admin | Tue Mar 14 1995 17:48 | 15 |
| Re : meeting the girlfriend - I'll give another side to it - it would
be a help to establish some sort of relationship with her now while
Angeline is young, especially if the relationship is going to be
longterm ('course, if it's not, you'll have to do this initial "meet
the girlfriend" a few times !) - over time, as A. gets older, you'll
have to deal with other issues and getting to know her before they arise
might make them easier to handle or you might even be able to address
them *before* they become an issue. An example from a friend of mine is
discipline - what's going to be your style, what's his, what's *her's*
if she's alone with Angeline ????? Ya, meeting her will probably be
uncomfortable, but think of it this way - if you were hiring a sitter,
would you just drop Angeline off and not meet/talk with her first ????
just my $.02
Debbi
|
918.19 | Why me? :-) | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Wed Mar 15 1995 08:11 | 29 |
| I guess I have to establish in my mind that she may be long term
(the girlfriend). It's just hard to. I mean, I was supposed to
be! David and I were together just short of three years, we were
having a baby and then he was gone. And to move in with someone
after only knowing her three months, doesn't consitute good judge-
ment. But who am I to say.
I find it easy to fall back on, "well he did it to me, he'll do
it to her.". But nice as it is to fall back on that, I know I
have to face it may not be true. It's just hard to take seriously
a girl who thinks it's ok to dump your pregnant girlfriend.
Again, who am I to say? I know I've got to try to open my mind
a little more where she is concerned, but I've had to do so much
emotional adjustment and readjustment this past year, it's tiring
and I don't consider her worth it. How would I feel in her shoes?
I wouldn't be there! And if I was stupid enough to give this guy
a chance, I certainly wouldn't jump right into moving in with him
after knowing him three months. Ok, I gotta off this or I'll ruin
my whole day :-).
I know I've got to meet the girl, and I guess I knew no one would
come up and say "why, you don't have to meet her". My daughter's
welfare is the most important issue, and you're right - I wouldn't
just leave her with a sitter I don't know.
I think I will suggest he brings her to my house to meet her though.
Hell, I can be juvenile enough to want to meet her on my "turf" first.
;-> ;-> cj *->
|
918.20 | | MPGS::PHILL | In casual pursuit of serenity. | Wed Mar 15 1995 09:34 | 24 |
| cj,
You've gone through a lot of pain already. Judging him does not help you
or Angeline. It is important to make decisions on his ability to care for
Angeline. Your feelings are important too. It will be hard to meet "the other
woman" but she might turn out to be good with Angeline and put your mind at
rest about sleepovers.
Getting back to Barbara and Alex. I was impressed by Barbara's ancouraging
a relationship between Alex and his Dad and by her non judgemental attitude.
She never put Alex's father down in front of him even though he was a jerk. She
left Alex to find out for himself. Anyway Alex's Dad's girlfriend turned out to
be a good contact. I remember her mailing Alex's winter coat when it was left
behind - something his Dad would never get around to.
I think all of this helped me when Barbara and I separated and I became the
part time disney-world Dad.
I guess I'm rambling. Anyway the point was it is important to do what is right
for Angeline even if that is uncomfortable but it is also important to take
care of yourself and your feelings too.
Take care,
Peter
|
918.21 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | proud counter-culture McGovernik | Wed Mar 15 1995 09:44 | 11 |
| cj,
This is from long experience with Lolita's father and live-in
girlfriend. Make the meeting on nuetral territory and a public place.
(I like coffee and tea shops YMMV) Don't bring Angeline to the first
meeting she will only distract all of you.
She isn't an ogre, most likely, and getting to know her on a personal
basis will probably put your mind at ease.
meg
|
918.22 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Mar 15 1995 09:53 | 13 |
|
re .20
You may never know what the woman is like until you meet her. Maybe she
is a whole lot like you and you make instant friends. Maybe she is very
different and you two never click. In either case, the best way to
treat her is like a sister-in-law, keep it cordial. The bottom line is
you want your daughter to be liked and well cared of at her place!
Good luck,
Eva
|
918.23 | But she can't tell you | STAR::SROBERTSON | | Thu Mar 30 1995 13:08 | 47 |
| Hi, just MHO:
Now is not the time to allow overnights. Your daughter cannot fend for
herself, nor can she communicate other than by crying. The father
lives outside a safe 'emergency' commute and let's face it, kids never
seem to get sick during normal waking hours; always after midnight and
before dawn! :) He has not completely developed a relationship/bond
with his daughter yet. You, on the other hand, are the Mom and know
what sound/cry means what and know what to do immediately. He, on the
other hand, does not only because he has not been the primary care
giver.
I believe that allowing for a bonding/relationship for a few hours or
even several hours is good because now the father is slowly accepting
your suggestions and probably feeling more comfortable in handling his
daughter and she more comfortable (in time) with him. Once his
confidence is up, so will hers and most importantly yours.
The 'girlfriend' will be involved eventually and you *may* find her to
be the only reason to allow for a sleepover. Never mind YOUR personal
feelings on an adult level. IF you get good vibes regarding her
interaction with your child and can realize that she has a good head
AND heart for the care of your daughter, then that can only be good for
everyone involved. Personal Experience: When my ex was seeing my
daughter he was living with a woman and she truly was a Godsend because
he was and is completely incapable of taking care of anyone and I more
than depended on his girlfriend to take care of my daughter. I always
gave meds/direction/whatever to her, NOT my daughter's father. That is
a whole other story, but...
Or you can take the easy way out and say, no overnights until our
daughter can communicate relatively well (2-3 years). Until such time,
continue with the visits and you may want to include full days back to
back (Sunday and Monday), but nighttime sleep is at HOME.
Good luck, it's tought to let go of your little one...*they* say it
gets easier, but I don't think so...I have 2 kids now 9 and 6, and I
like having them with me, they NEVER see their father and call their
stepfather "Daddy".
Also, none of my business, but...you MUST allow your daughter to get
with other people and family members...expose her to lots and lots of
people...develops their social skills, they get lots of love and
attention and you get 5 minutes of privacy, 5 minutes of doing what
grown ups do, and UNINTERRUPTED sleep! ;)
Sandra
|
918.24 | | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Thu Mar 30 1995 14:05 | 31 |
| Thanks for your input Sandra.
If there's one thing Angeline is used to, it's other people.
That kid has more miles on her than you can imagine. I do
have a hard time leaving her, but do do it. It just gets
so hard because wherever I leave her, I also have to take
her home. Now if that involves evenings, I hate having her
fall asleep somewhere and then have to wake up to come home
with me. Same as when I have a sitter. I hate to have to
wake her to take the sitter home. So, although I do get
out once in a great while (four times in six months), it is
not always easy to plan.
Hmm, I probably just gave an argument from her father's side
of the fence, eh?
As it stands right now, I'm just waiting until it becomes a reality,
then will address the issues then. In the meanwhile, I'm enjoying
quite a lull in the relationship with her father. When he visits,
we are getting along pretty well right now and that's a nice relief
for both of us. Of course, a lot of it has to do with me biting
my tongue and trying not to let him upset me. But Angeline is starting
to spend more time with both of us together rather than he comes in
the door, I go out it.
I expect to be back around this note later, I'll let you all know how
it goes.
Thanks again
cj *->
|
918.25 | I'm the Mommy, that's why! :) | STAR::SROBERTSON | | Thu Mar 30 1995 14:47 | 41 |
| Oh believe me, I *know* the biting the tongue routine...really stinks
tho! ;)
I more than agree about the waking the child up at night (or any time
for that matter). When I started going out with female friends and
later started dating, I had my sitter sleep over..talk about easy!!! ;)
Also, if your family lives close to you, you can try one overnight
there. Maybe the first time you might want to spend the night as well.
I am not saying to stay from the time you get there until morning, but
more like 'I am going out tonight, but instead of going home, I'll stay
here'. That way, you can be available IF necessary. Of course, when I
did that, I wasn't at all concerned because I have no qualms with
leaving my kids with my parents...I KNOW they will call me should
something come up that they cannot handle.
All I can say is, YOU are the Mommy. You know what is best for your
little one at this time. I would not let ANYone interfere with your
gut instinct. If you don't think it's time, then it's not. Period.
Fini.
You are lucky tho, although you and the father are no longer together,
you seem to trust him with your daughter. In a very short period of
time, he will have the overnights he wants, or thinks he wants, and you
will have the opportunity to have some alone time. A word of caution
tho, your first few *alone* times are gonna be more than tough, but
after a bit, you will treasure that time and truly be beyond thrilled
when your daughter arrives *home*. Actually, that's the best part!
Child: "Mommy, Mommy, I missed you sooooo much"
Mommy: "Nowhere near as much as I missed YOU!"
(Then the big hugs and kisses and that smile lights up the world!)
Boy, does that bring back memories! That's just going to my parents'
for an overnight!
Everything will work out, it always does. You're the Mommy and will do
what is right for your baby. You already know what you're going to do,
when and why. You needed just a bit of moral support and that you
received by all.
Sandra
|
918.26 | what are we assuming? | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Thu Mar 30 1995 15:25 | 10 |
| -.1> I more than agree about the waking the child up at night
> (or any time for that matter).
But then not all babies at all stages *wake up* when you transport
them.
And older kids can (be awakened from the couch and) walk, talk, change into
their PJs and get into bed--and never remember any of it in the morning.
Leslie
|
918.27 | My *H*O only, My choice. | STAR::SROBERTSON | | Thu Mar 30 1995 15:45 | 16 |
| Agreement on all points. As a matter of fact, kids probably have no
issue with it and most other things at all! :) All of what I have
written is only MHO. *I* choose for *my* kids UNinterrupted sleep.
Again, that is *my* preference. I am certainly not saying that it
shouldn't be done or whatever. I, me, myself, id, etc. am fortunate in
that I don't HAVE to wake my kids and I don't WANT to either.
If kids don't like something, they will let us know one way or the
other, they always do! :)
Anyway, I'm sure that we can all agree that kids, for the most part,
are very resiliant and can easily adapt. Only as we grow older and
more set in our ways does the resiliancy and adaptability wane.
Sandra
|
918.28 | Now there's a thought! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Thu Mar 30 1995 16:20 | 19 |
| You know Sandra, you brought up an interesting suggestion. I
could leave her at my sister's, go out, stay there, SLEEP IN!, in
the morning and just see how Angeline takes to it all. It would
be good for me to see her get up and be fine.
Of course, there's also the fact my sister has three kids. Angeline
is really comfortable anywhere there are other kids around because
there's SO MANY (another issue) of them at the house she goes to for
daycare. But it would get her used to waking up and seeing someone
other than Mommy. I'm still leaning more toward having her father
stay over a few times first though and having HIM care for her in
the morning. He's the one I want her to get used to seeing. I want
him to be caring for her, not his girlfriend.
I do like your suggestion though, and think I'll give it a try
sometime.
Thanks
cj *->
|
918.29 | Enjoy SLEEP!!! | STAR::SROBERTSON | | Thu Mar 30 1995 16:42 | 18 |
| Yes, it is REAL nice to sleep in for a change!!! Although my kids are
older now, I still have my *Mommy's Ear* open. When they are not home,
a nulear war couldn't wake me up!
As far as the father, you're right in that you would want him to learn
to care for his child and not the 'girlfriend', but chances are she
will be providing alot of the care and hopefully able to get thru to
him what you can't. Again, I know how hard it is and will be for you
to cope with the girlfriend being in the picture. Also, you are very
fortunate in that your ex is taking an active and caring role in his
daughter's life and seems to be trying to ensure that he be a part of
her life. If he is a good person, Angeline will bring out whatever
goodness there is. Wish I could say the same about my children's
father! (hasn't seen the kids in over 2 years and owes BIG$$$$ as
well).
How's the girlfriend going to like the idea of the ex 'sleeping
over'??? (this is meant to be a joke!) :D
|
918.30 | | ADISSW::HAECK | Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa! | Thu Mar 30 1995 16:43 | 18 |
| This reminds me of the first time when, as a newly single mom, I went
out alone for the first time and did not depend on my parents for
babysitting. Boy did I feel independent. Until I got home, well after
my daughters bedtime, and realized that I couldn't leave her in the
apartment alone while I drove the sitter home. Talk about a burst
bubble!
Since then I have come up with a few variations on how to handle this:
- hire a next door neighbor to sit. Since we live in a quiet
neighborhood she can walk home. This is of course with her
parents OK. And if they want, she will call for them to look for
her before she leaves my house.
- Have someone from what ever function I've gone to come home with
me and drive the sitter home for me.
- hire someone who has their own transportation.
So far, these have proven viable enough that I have not had to back out
of an evenings plans.
|
918.31 | Bit of an update | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Thu Apr 06 1995 13:38 | 38 |
| Well, David brought up the overnights again last night. This
time we tried the quiter, calmer, discussion mode than we
usually use. I guess we've been getting along so well we're
both afraid to break the spell.
Anyhow, I made it clear I wasn't going to buck him on it, or
come up with insipid excuses to stall it. I just want him to
try to have a little patience and compassion toward what it
is doing to me.
He even mentioned it probably would have been alot easier if
he wasn't living with someone else, and I managed not to talk
about how much I question her judgement/decision making ability
due to past performance. So no major brouhaha insued.
He accepted that I want to see his place first, and want to
meet the girlfriend first. I told him I also wanted him to talk
to his landlady and find out if the apartment has lead paint. I
told him I suspected it might (judging by the outside age/appearance
of the building). I told him I wasn't bringing it up to use as a
delay, just that I wanted him to find out before Angeline becomes
mobile and can chew on window sills.
He said if she stayed over (presumably starting in a month or two,
when his drafty apartment is warmer at night) and had a really
"freaked out" night, he would wait again until she could handle it.
This was his own suggestion.
That was about it. I tell you, though, the whole time I was
re-running and reprinting all the notes in here in my head, just
to follow all the advice really helped a lot. I kept my head and
tongue and hopefully laid some solid groundwork to make this all
go smoothly.
Thanks
cj *->
|
918.32 | Glad to hear it! | STAR::SROBERTSON | | Fri Apr 07 1995 12:36 | 18 |
| Good for you!!!!!! And good for him! You and he have set down the
ground rules by discussing what is best for your daughter. You were
open and candid about your personal feelings regarding the situation
and you were very up front regarding the welfare of Angeline while
she's in her father's care. He, we must give credit where credit is
due, agreed with your parental concerns and showed compassion for your
personal plight. It *appears* that you and he will be able to work
things out amicably and BOTH of you are most interested in the welfare
of your daughter (emotional, physical). That's what parents are
SUPPOSED to do.
You must feel somewhat relieved and Angeline will notice that you are
less stressed. You are a very lucky lady/Mom. You're both absolutely
right in taking it slowly for the benefit of your child.
Good luck!
Sandra
|
918.33 | Such work... | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Apr 07 1995 13:20 | 43 |
| Well Sandra,
I'm a little relieved the first round went smoothly, but less
stressed overall? No. I have all my same anxieties about her
going there, I'm just not unloading *all* of them on him. I'm trying
to keep us on an even keel.
I have dreams almost nightly of the whole thing, and some nightmares.
I hate the fact that I have to meet this girl. In fact, I hate the
fact that one of the biggest heartaches in my life isn't just gone.
I have to deal with him constantly. There's just no time for the
wounds to heal over a little.
But I am proud of the way I am handling it. I amaze myself sometimes
when I don't just fall back on the standard "seek and destroy tactics"
that the "wronged party" generally falls back on. If not for my
daughter, I would never have to see this man I loved so much again.
But I do have her, he is there, I have to push my strength and
maturity to the max to maintain some sanity, when I really feel like
sitting in a corner, have a pity party, and say "hey, you didn't want
me - you don't get your baby either". What would that get me? A
court date! Oh yeah, like I want that!
"Talking" things out here has been the best medicine for me. It's
helped bolster when I think I'm right, but kept me from screaming
out how right I am. It's also shown me other sides and points of
view.
My latest "inner" workings - I'm spending time reminding myself of
just how much I love my father. My Dad is the King of the World
to me and always has been. No, he's not perfect, but so what. I
don't know how my life could have been without him. I've been
telling myself how good it would be for my daughter to have this
love for her father. I have to do whatever I can to "help" that
to happen. Whether she ever sees or knows his shortcomings, as
I've come to learn my Dad's, it will be entirely up to her. But
I have to do what I can to encourage this wonderful thing to happen
for her. I'm trying to head down this path in my mind as much as
possible to see if it'll help me through this. Put things in a
different, more tolerant light.
cj *->
|
918.34 | | TLE::C_STOCKS | Cheryl Stocks | Fri Apr 07 1995 13:26 | 5 |
| cj,
I fervently hope never to be in a situation like yours, but if it
happens, you will be my role model!!
ch
|
918.35 | Now I'm blushing | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Apr 07 1995 14:13 | 5 |
| Thanks Cheryl!
That was nice.
cj *->
|
918.36 | Nice has nothing to do with it...FACT! | STAR::SROBERTSON | | Fri Apr 07 1995 15:20 | 25 |
| Good for you!!!!! My situation is ENTIRELY different, although I KNOW
how very difficult it is/can be/might be/will be...make sense? ;)
You are a mother now. You are doing what YOU feel is best for your
child. You are absolutely right knowing that, in time, your daughter
will "see" reality. If you had chosen another path, she may have put
her far reaching father on a pedestal and worshipped him from afar and
ultimately blame you for whatever disaster may befall him. This was
you are allowing for a relationship which he may or may not continue.
Only time will tell (and I don't mean to sound negative, but it's hard
to read any inflections!).
Again CJ, GOOD FOR YOU!!!!! You are setting a very good example for
other Mom's in a similar situation. From what I have read from your
notes, IMHO, I feel you should, as quickly as possible, find a way to
get over ALL personal feelings for this man and *allow* yourself to
live a very happy life and allow good people in it. You have learned
alot and gone thru alot and it sure sounds to me that you have an awful
lot to offer. Yes CJ, there IS life after a bummer ride! ;)
Sandra_VERY_happily_married
(but it took a very bad 1st marriage to help me appreciate what is
REALLY important) :)
P.S. Good luck, but I don't think you'll need it
|
918.37 | Communication breakdown | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Wed Apr 19 1995 16:30 | 116 |
| Well folks, I have an update and it's not good and I need a little
re-inforcement or re-alignment once again. Quick update. Angeline's
father, David, started his new job last week. He started a job in
New Jersey, four days a week - Tues to Fri. When he talked to me
about it we agreed he would see Angeline on Monday's now that he
could no longer keep the original schedule planned. All well and
good. This past week was his first week down there and he came up
Monday as planned. He came up telling me he wants to take her for
the day this coming Sunday. I say, "but why not Monday?". He wants
to take her Sunday for the following reasons and then things got messy
and I'll try to spell it out as unbiased as I can.
. I get two free days a week with Angeline. He agreed to Mondays
because it was convenient and didn't interfere with my weekend with
her.
. Him: so, now I only get one day a week?
. Me: for seven months you have made no efforts to ever see her more
than once a week, in spite of the many times I have tried to encourage
you to come see her on weekends. He has never bothered.
. Him: he lives an hour a way and can't afford the gas to come more
than once a week.
. Me: when he moved out of him Mom's last November, he moved to an
apartment still in the same town. He made no effort to move closer
to his daughter when there were locations that would put him closer
to his daughter AND his work, he chose not to. I don't except this
constant whining, "I live an hour away, I can't afford the gas". He
made this choice. I think the $8.00 (his estimate) it takes for a
round trip to see her could come from somewhere to see her even a
second time once in a while.
. Him: so I only get one day a week that's it.
. Me: no, we had said you were going to be taking her overnight
sometimes, on those times he is going to have to pick her up on
Sunday anyways. Why not just wait till then. Why start this
up now.
. Him: shouldn't she at least be used to going to his place a bit
before BANG she's staying overnight?
. me: Yes! Good point, and that's what Monday's are for! Why does
it have to be on Sunday when I am not working?
. Him: so his family and friend's can see her.
. Me: his family has made little to no effort to see her in spite
of my constant invites and my taking the hour's drive to see
them pretty frequently with her. His friend's a) have showed no
interest in ever seeing her when she was born or any other time,
b) his friend's are not a consideration when we are discussing the
issue of (and I hate using this wording but...) his time as opposed
to mine. I don't feel I should have to have her away from me just
for his friends. This of course would all be a different situation
if he worked a Mon. to Fri. like everyone else. Yes, then I would
have to give up a weekend day, but that is not the case here and not
what he agreed to.
. Him: I'm (meaning me) just doing this because I have so many bad
feelings over the past year. I don't want her to go because he's living
with someone else.
. Me: quite right, I don't, but have to accept it. And BTW, I still
haven't seen the apartment or met the live-in girl that is going to
be around Angeline so much.
. Him: (in spite of previously agreeing to both those things) has
decided I should have faith in his judgement and now does not want
me to see the place or meet the girl. I should know he would do
nothing to hurt Angeline and be satisfied with that.
. Me: I feel it would be irresponsible for me to just allow her
to go stay somewhere and with someone that I haven't first seen
and met, and besides, I NEED to do this. He had agreed to it and
it would help me past this transition in the long run.
. He: I'm being selfish and have ulterior motives. He doesn't ask
to meet whoever I have Angeline around. How would I feel if he had
to meet anyone that I had with her.
. Me: If I started seeing someone and they were going to be around
Angeline a lot, I think he SHOULD expect to meet them. In fact, judging
by my past record and judgement in men I think he should insist on it.
And now it gets ugly because I pointed out a person in my past that
I (stupidly) allowed to mentally and abused me for two years before
getting out of it. Another who decided to "brick" the side of my
face when I broke up with him, and more recently someone I loved
and they walked out on me in my ninth month of pregnancy! Look at
how good my judgement is! Well....needless to say that brought
the house down.
So...he feels I don't need at all to see his place or meet the girl.
I'm being unreasonable and trying to cause problems. I'm insisting
he can only see her once a week. I try to deny that, I'm only saying
"why are you starting this already?" You agreed to Mondays, you've
been on this job ONE WEEK and already you're rocking the boat. Why
couldn't you wait till you were taking her overnight when I would
have to deal with this anyways. Why are you pushing me?". Then he
goes back to "breaking" Angeline into his apartment, I go back to
that's what "Monday's" are for, and we're back to nowhere again,
and now our "getting along" is blown right out of the water again.
So tell me, am I unreasonable. I felt after all the notes and writing
we had going in here that it was not unreasonable for me to want to
see his place or meet this girl. Why would I want to unless I
absolutely felt I should???? This is not fun for me. Why can't he
just allow it and be done with it. Because I am supposed to just
blindly trust his judgement and that's that.
HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!
cj *->
|
918.38 | | NOTAPC::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Wed Apr 19 1995 16:55 | 17 |
| re: .37 cj
> So tell me, am I unreasonable. I felt after all the notes and writing
> we had going in here that it was not unreasonable for me to want to
> see his place or meet this girl. Why would I want to unless I
> absolutely felt I should???? This is not fun for me. Why can't he
> just allow it and be done with it. Because I am supposed to just
> blindly trust his judgement and that's that.
Since you asked... IMO, you are *not* being unreasonable. We won't
let our (6yr old) daughter visit her school friends unless we know
something about the family (maybe even met the mother and/or father),
and that's usually for only a couple of hours. I wouldn't dream of
letting her into a situation like this unless I was comfortable with
it. Good luck.
- Tom
|
918.39 | Re-negotiate and have a contract written up..... | YIELD::STOOKER | | Wed Apr 19 1995 16:59 | 30 |
| Blindly trust his judgement? Ha! Why wouldn't he want you to meet
the woman who is going to be looking after your daughter. What besides
his moving has changed?
Why would he agree to a visitation days and then back down on it?
Did you have a written contract with him about what was agreed to and
what wasn't? If not, I'd start re-negotiating and have one written up.
I don't know too much about the legal system, but I would think that
what-ever you wrote up, even if it wasn't in legal terms, if you had it
signed in the presence of a notary, he doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Perhaps he's just trying to give himself a way out, by making you look
like you aren't following through on your agreements. Does he pay you
child support at the moment? If he does, maybe this is just a way for
him to try and get out of it. Maybe he thinks that if he pushes and
pushes you, that perhaps you will sign a legal document saying that you
expect no support from him, but he has to stay out of his daughters
life.
I don't know, but something tells me that you can't trust this one to
follow through on his promises. It makes no difference what "bad
judgements" you might have made in the past. The judgements that you
make about your daughter now is what is important. I can't blame you
for having second thoughts about the care that he and his new "SO" will
give your daughter.
Just My Opinion........ But, I certainly wouldn't let my daughter go
ANYWHERE unless I knew what, when, where, how and who...... EXTREMELY
WELL.
|
918.40 | | TLE::C_STOCKS | Cheryl Stocks | Wed Apr 19 1995 17:01 | 11 |
| I wonder if this is a control thing (thinking of sort of parallel sorts
of discussions I've had with my kids). Maybe he just wants to be able
to feel like he's making some of the decisions, and not just following
your orders. With my kids, I've found that I can be creative about
giving them some decisions to make, so they don't feel like they're
being completely dictated to, but the areas that I won't/can't
negotiate go the way I decide. Maybe a similar technique would help
in your situation? Sorry, I don't have a specific idea about what his
part of the decision-making could be, offhand.
ch
|
918.41 | safety | STAR::MRUSSO | | Wed Apr 19 1995 17:30 | 19 |
| To me this is pretty cut and dry...
At this point, Angeline is probably pretty easy to manage because
she isn't mobile (maybe this isn't true anymore). But very soon she
will be. You need to see his apartment to determine if there are
safety issues. Choking hazards, stairways, unsecure windows, lead
paint. David and his SO aren't used to having kids around. Does he
have a crib and a high chair? Do either of them smoke and leave
matches around? electrical outlets?
I also agree with you, his friends are not a consideration at the
expense of your time with Angeline.
I don't blindly trust anyone. Especially with my kids. You're in
a tough spot. What are David's legal rights at this point? For
Angeline's sake, you and David have to try very hard to keep it
amicable.
Good luck,
Mary
|
918.42 | Some specifics.. | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Wed Apr 19 1995 17:35 | 59 |
| Cheryl,
I think you are on the right track. He mentioned a couple of times
he can only see her "on my terms". But to me, if we were going on
"my terms", he would have being seeing her a lot more than he has.
I want to make it clear here. He LOVES his daughter. He would in
no way want to be out of her life. He would never look for a way
out of seeing her. But he does come up with some pretty half-as**d
excuses that I know he believes are valid. I think it boils down
to laziness myself. I wish I could just place in your heads the
knowledge I have of his mother and you could see how he was raised.
I see a lot of her personality/influence in his decision making
processes. Basically, it's him first before anything else.
So the fact that these things, seeing his place, meeting the
#@&#@! girl, would help me is immaterial to him. How I feel and
what would help me does not matter.
He knows I have an attitude toward her (the SO), and I agree with him. I
have also assured him I would not mistreat her. That perhaps seeing
she is not some brainless twit would in fact help me. If she is so
great, I'll see it too. I told him, "I'm not out to meet her and
go...she's a bimbo - Angeline can't be around her". I am only trying
to find a peace of mind. Unfortunately, tempers were hot by that
point and the wording above is exactly what I used. I had hoped to
never say it to him that way. I told him it is the way I feel, but
he should give me a chance and I will surprise him. I am more than
willing to have my attitude change...just give me the chance.
I have never and will never deny him time with his daughter, but
why can't some consideration be given to what it is doing to me to
have her go there?
Oh, we have no binding legal agreements. We have been trying, and
I'm afraid it's about to fail, to keep this out of court. He did
mention that had this gone to court I would be giving her up now
every other weekend like it or not. That may or may not be the
case, but the mention of it all sent shivers up my spine. It's
true, I don't want a structured set up like that. Maybe I do want
it all on my terms, but my terms have never been unfair.
He, on the other hand, does not want this to go to court either
because a court appointed support payment would be more than he
can handle. So basically we both have each other by the throat.
I set his support payment at such a ridiculously low amount that
no one knows what it is (not that it's anyone's business) out of
embarrassment on my part. I set it though so I'd have a margin
for later when I need more. I just don't need what I think the
court would make him pay. He makes his payments (now) without
any problem. Actually, he post dates four or five checks at a
time and gives them to me because he can't be responsible enough
(his words) to mail them to me each week. If he has something
come up and doesn't see Angeline that week, I kind of get shafted,
so we went to the post-dated check and it's working so far.
cj *->
cj *->
|
918.43 | | POWDML::AJOHNSTON | beannachd | Wed Apr 19 1995 17:54 | 58 |
| Off the top of my head:
My first thought [and most random] is that Angeline's father's vehicle
must be a real gas-guzzler because I drive a family car 1.25 hrs to and
from work every single morning plus miscellaneaous trips and my
gasoline costs for a week average $18-20, not $8/round-trip. [I'm only
computing gasoline costs as $8 is way too low to account for wear and
tear as well]
But enough about the trivialities.
You have every right to see where Angeline will be spending time. He
has certainly seen where you live and been able to assure himself that
his daughter is living in a comfortable, healthy place.
If you were/are seeing someone on a regular, serious basis he
would/does have every right to meet that individual. If you were living
with someone, it would be even more important. You are not asking to
check out his dates; you want to meet the woman he lives with, that
your daughter will be "living" with on her overnights. Stick to your
guns.
As for him getting one versus two days. You are right that you have the
week-ends for quality time and that he shouldn't take it as given that
you give up one whenever it suits him. Still, if he really wants to see
more of his daughter [and the environment is a good one] it might be a
very good idea to schedule times when he gets two days. Maybe pick
Angeline up early Sunday one week-end a month and bring her back
Monday.
Still, I don't think you are to that point yet.
He throwing a lot of emotional argument at you where he knows you're
vulnerable. Not fair, but very human.
I think you can both agree that he left the two of you, and his timing
was absolutely lousy [not that there's ever a good time, but late in a
pregnancy is tacky to the max].
I think the two of you can agree that you, yourself, have a few
unresolved, very negative feelings from the situation.
He should be able to realise that drawing a line and saying "the past
is over, I'm here now" isn't some magic band-aid.
A child needs order and sense of being able to depend. Even if the two
of you were the very best of friends and agreed on everything, managing
the changes that you need to make would require delicacy and patience.
Seeing this man's home and meeting his SO should make it easier to let
Angeline go with some level of comfort. Yes, it is about trust.
But I don't think it's about _distrust_. I trust my parents, but I
wouldn't let my infant/toddler visit them alone in a house or place I'd
never seen. It's not that I distrust my parents; it's that I need the
reassurance.
Annie
|
918.44 | Unfair? | MPGS::PHILL | In casual pursuit of serenity. | Wed Apr 19 1995 18:04 | 29 |
| cj,
It's hard to have to go through all this.
I don't think you can expect communication between the two of you to improve
just because you are apart. I think he's pressing every button he knows. Like
Cheryl said it's (at least partially) a control issue. HAve you thought of going
to a mediator to help you talk things out. I was thinking that maybe EAP could
help.
I guess from his perspective it is unfair. If you could explain to him
something of your viewpoint maybe he would see things differently. Maybe if you
could figure out why you want things a particular way you could explain it
without him feeling controlled. If you tell him that you would be happier if you
could meet the other woman and see his place. Kinda turn it around from your
approving his choices to settling your piece of mind. The same with the Monday vs
Sunday. Maybe he could do Sunday once in a while to have Angeline visit her
relatives and his friends.
You both have needs. If you manage to find a solution together the control
issue goes away.
First I think you need to define what your needs are without demanding
solutions.
I'm happy for Angeline that you both want her. That you care so much and that
he is prepared to contribute to her life too.
Take care,
Peter.
|
918.45 | Dust settled a bit... | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Thu Apr 20 1995 13:26 | 31 |
| Well, I called down to New Jersey last night to try to get the
air a little clearer. I hate when we leave things angry and
unsettled, but there are times when it just has to be that way.
You get saying your point of view over and over, the other gets
saying their view over and over, neither's listening, tempers rise,
a mess.... sometimes stepping back , give it a day.
So I called. We talked on an even keel. He still feels it is not
necessary for me to see the place or meet the girl. I told him I've
had this issue out on an open forum. I've asked and discussed to be
sure it is not just me and my emotions governing that request. I am
convinced I'm correct on this, I'm only being responsible, I need this
to make the transition somewhat better for me. I told him I had never
intended to use the wording and anger I used concerning the girlfriend,
that I am trying to open my mind to this. He has not even mentioned to
her that I am asking this. I asked him to ask her what she thinks of
it. Leave it up to her. He is still not receptive to that, but
we'll give him time to think about it.
He still has in his head I'm "denying" him ever having a second day
with her. I'm trying to tell him I just feel he rushed and pushed too
fast. We both knew the overnights were coming and he could have just
waited. I think he may be seeing that a bit more, but I think he still
thinks I'm just using delay tactics and will come up with more excuses
later.
Well, nothing really gained at all...but the communication lines are
back open a bit. Gotta say I lost another night's sleep though.
Angeline may sleep like a log all night, but boy does her father keep
me awake! :-)
cj *->
|
918.46 | I'm not all bad.. | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Thu Apr 20 1995 13:47 | 27 |
| Oh! I did want to mention. I do try to involve him in different
decisions, although at this time there really isn't that many to
make. But when I was going down to Conneticut over a weekend, I
called and let him know we would be gone. He never does try to
see her on weekends, and doesn't even call, but I did call just
to let him know she would be gone.
And in the midst of all this mess, I did also have another reason
to call him last night. That being, I want to get her signed up
for Aquatics at the "Y". Of course, I called today and all the
classes are full, so I have to wait for the next term. But I did
tell him about it and asked if he had any objections.
I do my best to make him feel like a Daddy. There are two pictures
up of him with his daughter in my house for her to see. One is beside
her bed, with all three of us in it together, from her Christening.
I send him all the Daddy cards for b-day, and Christmas, and Easter,
and Valentines day, and they all have new pictures enclosed. He's
gotten presents from her for most of those days. Me, I get nothing.
And you know, it kills me - but I can't stop doing what I feel is
right. I feel as a father/daddy he deserves to get "Daddy" things.
And yes, I do get disappointed and hurt when I don't, even though I
know it will always be that way. But there are women in perfectly
happy marriages that get the same treatment, so I guess that's just
one of the crosses to bear :-).
cj *->
|
918.47 | | MPGS::PHILL | In casual pursuit of serenity. | Thu Apr 20 1995 14:54 | 5 |
| cj,
I'm glad you are still talking.
Take care,
Peter.
|
918.48 | Another perspective.... | MROA::DUPUIS | | Mon Apr 24 1995 13:46 | 36 |
| cj,
I guess I'm in the minority here, but as a custodial mother and the
live in girlfriend of a non-custodial father, I think that you should
allow David to see his daughter. Yeah, you might be missing a day with
her, but, you have her all week long. Yes, I know most of that time
is spent at day care or sleeping,.. but you get to feed her on a daily
basis, be the one she smiles at when she wakes up, and hug and kiss
her any time you feel like it. David is not able to do that. Maybe he
doesn't really want to take her and is just using the switch day thing
to ease his conscious (I said I'd take her, but she won't give the day
I want, so at least I tried.). Give him every opportunity to spend as
much time as he can with her. She is not just yours and even though
you'd like to make sure that her environment is safe, that's his
responsiblity too and when you take away his responsibilities, that
doesn't leave him with much. I am living with a guy who was told when
he decided to leave his wife that he would never get his son out of the
house. Well, so far she has done everything in her power to make sure
that that doesn't happen.....the things that she has done I can not get
into right now, but it has gone before the courts and family services
is involved and now the recommendation is ready to go before the courts
and regular (what most divorced men get, one day a week and every other
weekend) visitations are about to begin. So unless you have a valid
reason (ie, drinking/drugs) for keeping your daughter from her father,
I wouldn't do it. As for wanting to see the apartment and meet the
girlfriend, in a perfect world that would be great, in real life --
dream on. If I ever told my ex, I wanted to see where he lived and
meet his girlfriend he'd tell me to fry ice and so would the courts
(unless of course you had reasonalbe grounds again, drinking/drugs).
I know you only want what's best for your daughter and maybe that is
spending time with her dad on his "conditions". Compromises can always
be worked on later.
Roberta
|
918.49 | FWIW | ALFA1::PEASLEE | | Mon Apr 24 1995 14:01 | 17 |
| I agree with the previous noter in terms of checking out the girlfriend.
When your child is able to be with her father, he should be
responsible for her, not the girlfriend. Checking out the girlfriend
sounds odd to me. You are divorced, who he spends time with is
absolutely none of your concern UNLESS that person is capable of
harming your child in any way, in which case, there should be
restrictions.
You should encourage him to spend time with your (his and your) child,
not throw obstacles in the way.
You should discuss with him any concerns for her safety and agree how
the matter of her safety should be handled. And, you should realize
that he has a life separate from yours and may have different values
than you. However, you need to agree that the childs welfare is of the
utmost importance.
My two cents.
Nancy
|
918.50 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | proud counter-culture McGovernik | Mon Apr 24 1995 15:46 | 22 |
| Sorry,
If the girlfriend is living in his apartment, she will be involved,
however minorly, in the care of the child. I think wanting to meet
someone who will be in the home with a child, particularly one who
can't talk to defend herself, is very reasonable. If this was an older
child, I might concede the idea that meeting her isn't necessary, but
we are talking about an infant/toddler here. This year in CO the
partners of NCP's have been directly responsible for the deaths of
young children in two cases that I know of. (In one case the partner
was female, in the other male, and in the most recent case the ncp's
partner was left alone with the toddler for less than 30 minutes before
he was shaken into brain death. It was the first time he had met the
baby.)
Also, given the earlier information that the apartment doesn't have
sufficient heat, I would insist on a home visit, before allowing my
child to stay overnight, and really with a very yong child to make sure
the house is reasonably child-proof. (No peeling paint, exposed wires,
roach or ant bait left out, household poisons kept locked up, etc.)
meg
|
918.51 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Mon Apr 24 1995 16:07 | 16 |
|
re. .49
>You are divorced, who he spends time with is
I don't think this is the case here. I believe the original
noter never married the father and is assuming sole responsbility
of the child. Maybe I am old-fashioned, but I think the
original noter is setting up the visitations out of love, which
is over and beyond her duty, IMO. The original noter cannot depend
on anybody else to look out or support for her child. So, why can't
her concerns be valid? Give her a break. ;-)
Eva
|
918.52 | But there are TWO parents! | ALFA1::PEASLEE | | Mon Apr 24 1995 17:09 | 15 |
| RE: .49 She is assuming sole responsibility by choice. This note is
about the father wanting to participate in the child's upbringing.
Ultimately the child's TWO parents are responsible for her. The
basenoter is chosing to exclude the father. (BTW - her reasons might
or might not be valid but she is chosing to exclude the father)
Whether or not they were married when the child was conceived - the TWO
parents still have responsibility (financial and otherwise for the
child)
Am I in the minority thinking that both parents (should have) equal
responsibility and accessability to the child (if it makes sense).
Nancy
|
918.53 | I think I'll step in here... | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Mon Apr 24 1995 17:13 | 68 |
| Whoa... I've been busy and not around here.... 8-)
As for not meeting the girlfriend, I'm convinced by too many parents
here that it is something I should do. It was mentioned that unless
drugs/drinking are involved it's kind of (using my own terms -
interpreting what was said) none of my business???? You're joking
right? I AM getting real, I live in a very real situation. This is
now mine, his, and my daughter's lives. I have never denied him
any time with her, and am not using delay tactics. I have simply
said I need to meet the girl and see the place. I questioned it
being reasonable and now feel it is. If I said "she cannot go until I
meet the girl", or if I walked into his place and said, "no, no,
no this is not good - nope she can't come here", now you're talking
delay tactics.
Back to .48 or whatever your number was, this girl should have no
objections to meeting me either. You think this is fun for me?
Like I'm looking forward to it??? You think I'm going to sit back
and go, "oops, she's a bimbo - forget it"??? That is not what I'm
out to do. But I cannot trust blindly in a person who has blown
my faith entirely out of the water...and not just in decisions he
made concerning our relationship, but there's others that scare me
too. I find fault with you having someone else's kids with you
when their parent never met you. I wouldn't send my daughter off
to daycare without interviewing the daycare woman/staff. I wouldn't
hire a babysitter off the street and leave my daughter with her -
sight unseen. That's irresponsible and, yes, the same thing.
I asked, encouraged, her father to meet the woman I wanted to chose
for daycare - he never did. I feel he should in turn meet any man
that may become an important part of my life also. I do believe in
it going both ways.
I feel it is very little off his back to let me walk in the place,
and meet the girl. If she's so special and so wonderful, Hey, I'll
see it too, right? But I have never given this as an ultimatum.
But he continues to refuse, it will be a problem soon, because I am
not going to let her go off like this. I need to settle my own peace
of mind.
Yes, there are too many people out there killing their girlfriend's
or boyfriend's kids. Will my meeting this girl prevent that???
I'm sure not, but she and I have to deal with each other, supposedly
anyways, for a "long time". It's time we met. To spend the time
he is requesting, this should not be such an issue to him. I was
never suspicious and am trying not to be, but this continued refusal
will make me suspicious and then I'll never sleep! :-) I feel this
IS a compromise.
If you don't think I've had to compromise - GUESS AGAIN! I've dealt
with him in my home on a weekly basis. He has access to get in there
because he gets out of work earlier than I and picks her up at daycare
and takes her home to spend time with her. I have his picture up in
my livingroom and in her bedroom so she can practice seeing who Daddy
is. I have to have his fruitcake mother over, when she bothers to
show up. My whole life has become a compromise. I teach him
everything I can so he can care for her when I'm not there. He knows
NOTHING about kids. I teach him how to bath her, how to feed her,
the tricks to being a parent, heck, I've had to teach him how to
put her clothes on because he always gets them backwards! (And she
looks awful cute when he does it! :-) .
Am I a saint, should I be martyred??? Of course not! No..I'm not
on a soapbox. I am a mother who loves her daughter and has to know
she is safe. That's it, plain and simple.
cj *->
|
918.54 | re. 49 | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Mon Apr 24 1995 17:18 | 8 |
| Oh, and Nancy...I don't know if you missed over it. But her
father is living with this girl. I'm not asking to meet whomever
he dates - but she lives with him. As other noters have mentioned,
I may find her to be level headed and be able to take better care
than he. He sleeps like a log, I'm worried sick about that. Hey,
she may wake up at the sound of a mouse fart! Great! I'll feel
better!
cj
|
918.55 | Cut me some slack! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Mon Apr 24 1995 17:25 | 11 |
| I can't keep up here :-). Again...I am not trying to keep her
father from her life! Just today I had scheduled two dr's appts.
for her so he could attend both of them with me.
I have tried again and again to encourage he see her more. I
even leave my house all the time so they can be alone. I am not
denying her going to his house. Don't make me out to be one of
those witches fighting tooth and nail to keep him away. Believe me
it is not true!
cj *->
|
918.56 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | proud counter-culture McGovernik | Mon Apr 24 1995 17:46 | 26 |
| FWIW
lolita was 7 when her father and I split up. With the exception of
"The purple haired horror freak" (lolita's name for this girlfriend) when
she was 15, we both met each others steady friends who would be in the
home when she was there overnight. It gave us both some peace of mind (or
maybe a model for a voodoo doll if anything had happened to her at the
hands of a partner), to know who the other person in the house would
be.
My Sister's husband's ex and my sister have met each other and get
along SOMEWHAT as Bob and Sarah have a joint custodial arrangement, and
Cecile often has Bren when Bob is out of town. I imagine when Sarah
has a steady partner in her life again that Cecile and Bob will meet
him as well. I believe it is common courtesy for starters, and if
there are problems with custodial arrangements in the future, both
sides know who the involved parties are.
I also agree that not meeting someone who will be in the house
overnight with the child, is like not meeting your child's daycare
staff, teachers in school, or Boy Scout or Girl Scout leaders, or other
people who will be with your child a significant amount of time. I
would consider a "go blow" in response to a polite request to meet this
person actionable.
meg
|
918.57 | not attacking, just showing another side..... | MROA::DUPUIS | | Tue Apr 25 1995 09:11 | 58 |
| Meg -- I am just trying to throw in some reality here. If David does
not want her meeting the girlfriend, it's not something she can demand.
If this ever goes to court it would get laughed out. Check out the non
custodial parenting file for views on this. I too, would love to
personally meet everyone my daughters come in contact with, but that's
impossible. When my daughters are at their Dad's I HAVE to trust his
judgement. Whether I want to or not, it's for my own sanity, to put my
faith in GOD. When my daughter came home with a motorcycle burn on her
leg, my boyfriend went ballistic and wanted me to call her father and
ream him out and tell him what he can and can not do with her. I did
not, because he is her dad and he is going to make some mistakes just
as I have. My youngest right now is sporting a PURPLE chin because I
took her roller skating in the tennis courts and she fell down hard.
Eva -- I agree that cj is trying to set up the visits out of love and
does want what's best for her child. I am just looking at the out side
of the coin and sharing what has been my reality.
Nancy -- I think we are in agreement. A parent is not the owner of a
child. A child is on loan to BOTH parents until she is of the age to
venture out on her own. But no one parent should control the access of
the child, the one who is hurt the most in the end is the child. What
if David just says forget it, then Angeline is missing out a large part
of her life.
CJ -- I too, agree meeting the girlfriend would be nice. I think I
stated that in my original note. But, when you send the child to her
dad, he is then responsible for her and her environment. If you
honestly cannot trust him to act responsibly, then you NEED to protect
your daughter legally.
You also wrote that you find fault with me for not knowing the parnet
of the child who comes to my house...well, you should reread my note
because I pretty sure that it stated that my boyfriend has not been
able to take his child from his ex's house, but it has gone before
court and family services and we are just waiting for a date for visits
outside of her home to begin. FWIW, I have met the child's mother and
I would love to sit with her and talk about the upcoming visits and
parenting styles so that the child has a sense of consistency. But she
is not willing to do that. On the same hand, my ex has no desire to
meet my boyfriend, he just wants my daughters to know that he is the
daddy and that my boyfriend treats them well.
I also did not say that you have not compromised. As the mothers we
compromise all the time. I know all to well what it is like to
sacrifice and deal with relatives who decided when I ended the marriage
that I no longer exist (won't even look in my direction), who are
alcoholic and wacked out alot of the time and one sister-in-law who is
still my best friend.
I think it's great that you let him attend dr visit's, even better if
he actually goes, does he? My boyfriend would kill for that opportunity.
I have invited my ex, but he would rather I just let him know if there
are any problems he should be aware of.
Good luck, my heart does go out to you.....
Roberta
|
918.58 | Ok, I'm better now :-) | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Apr 25 1995 09:48 | 35 |
| Roberta,
I probably was a little touchy too yesterday because I had just
returned from a couple of tough dr's appointments, and yes, her
father did go. He generally doesn't but that is changing now that
he has Mondays off. I plan on scheduling most of her appt's for
Monday now so I can get the help getting her back and forth. Plus,
we had to make a decision on having her get an MRI, so it was good
he was there. His was the deciding vote to get it done.
I'm not going to get into an argument over what the courts would
and wouldn't allow. The fact that he doesn't want to allow it is
questionable enough to me. But I have to argue this out with him,
I'm not going to do it anymore here.
I do appreciate getting other points of view, it was what I asked
for in the first place. I did get defensive though, and I'm sorry.
I guess I just try so hard sometimes to keep this on an even keel
that when we go off track, I take it personally. I'm so afraid of
becoming a wicked witch of all directions, that I have to come in
here and get some re-inforcement. I want more than anything to have
this NOT become a relationship like you have described. But sitting
back and saying "well, I'm just going to have to never meet the girl
or see his place" just to keep the peace is not good for me, and I
firmly believe it is not right. I didn't feel that way initially,
but now I do.
So, off go the boxing gloves :-) and thanks to all for your help and
thoughts and the off-line responses have been really helpful and
supportive. Many times I have changed gears from somebody just saying,
"Hey, I think you're out of line here". I am open to that.
cj *->
|
918.59 | | LJSRV1::BOURQUARD | Deb | Tue Apr 25 1995 10:33 | 10 |
| cj,
It may help to recognize that you are under no obligation to justify
your decisions here. (And you probably already know this)
But I know that sometimes when I ask for advice, I feel like I have to
explain why I didn't follow it. I have to consciously remind myself
that I always have the option of simply saying "Thank you for the advice" and
then ignoring it completely :-)
- Deb B.
|
918.60 | | MROA::DUPUIS | | Tue Apr 25 1995 10:50 | 3 |
| <-- Ditto, what she said.....
Roberta
|
918.61 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Apr 25 1995 12:20 | 22 |
|
re. 52
Nancy,
First off, I never got the impression that cj is excluding, or
choosing to exclude the father. She is just voicing her concern
about the enivironment. Theoretically, you are right about the
two parent ideal. But in actuality, people and life are not as
simple as black and white. If we put ourselves in cj's shoes, we
would understanding that all she is trying to do is to provide the
best she could for her child. She is taking the sole responsiblity
maybe by choice, maybe by circumstances. Sure, the father has rights,
but the bottom line is that cj still has all the responsiblity. It is
great if the father gets involved and helps out, but it would be imprudent
to bank a child's well being on that expectation. Afterall, he didn't
sign any paper saying he'd be responsible for anything, did he? Ideology
sounds great, but reality is what we have to live with.
Eva
|
918.62 | The place.. | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Apr 25 1995 12:44 | 22 |
| Just one thing concerning the apartment itself. When David got
it, his exact words were, "it's a dive, but at least I can afford
the rent". I have not brought those words back up to him at all.
In fact, it is not up to me to say "hey, this place is a pit, she
can't come here". I'm the world's worse housekeeper and would not
want anyone saying "this is a mess, your daughter can't be here".
I may have suggestions - "gee, those window sills are low David,
you may have to consider something to block her falling out them
when she's walking". Maybe, something like that. I do not
want to go with the intention of critiqueing (sp?) his place.
But I do need to see it. I need to know I've seen it, I need to
be able to visualize where she is and know it's fine.
I KNOW David wouldn't have her in a place with coackroaches. Yes,
I do trust him to that point. He lived in a place in Fall River
for six months with roaches, and knows how easily they "spread".
But he is totally inexperienced with kids and there just may be
things he misses. Again, that is not my entire purpose in going
there, but a benefit we can both realize.
cj *->
|
918.63 | | STAR::SROBERTSON | | Mon May 08 1995 12:48 | 28 |
| And since his place is a dive, how can he possibly even WANT to expose his
daughter, who is becoming more and more mobile, to that environment??? His live
in, fine, but his own flesh and blood? I understand he wants to spend time with
his child and be a part of her life, but come on now, does he REALLY want to
expose her to that? Probably not, but he's trying to be in control_mode and
hasn't even thought about it and won't until he experiences it. Unfortunately,
that's how many fathers learn, by experience and NOT by someone else's good
sense. I know, I'll probably get flamed for that comment, but from what I have
experienced myself, this is what I have come to learn.
There is NO easy way to handle this. You are behaving like a concerned mother
and he is behaving like an inexperienced, control needing father, albeit he
probably does want to have her, but is not thinking beyond his own need. I am
not saying this in in a derrogatory manner, but as probable fact (based upon my
experience only).
I *think* what all the replies are saying, do what you think is best for you and
your daughter. It was mentioned that YOU have ALL the responsibility and you
must do what is good for your child...PERIOD. We parents make mistakes all the
time, we are not perfect, neither are our own parents or those before them, but
we try our very best to do what is right for our children. Always with THEIR
best interests/welfare/safety/emotional stability in mind. Whatever it takes to
ensure that, we try very hard to do. And you, too, are doing that. Good job,
CJ...
Take very good care...
Sandra
|
918.64 | | MROA::DUPUIS | | Fri Jun 02 1995 13:48 | 3 |
| Cj-- If you don't mind my asking....how are things going?
Roberta
|
918.65 | WARNING: LONG ONE! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Jun 02 1995 16:20 | 66 |
| Hi Roberta,
I don't mind. Things have gone up and down. We finally came
to an agreement on me seeing the apartment and meeting the girlfriend.
This past Monday, in fact, it was supposed to happen. We spoke on
Friday evening and he asked to have her up this on Monday. I said
fine and agreed to bring her up. I said I'd like her home by five
Monday evening to give her supper and get her bath done and she's
usually in bed by 7:00 or 7:30, although that has gotten a bit later
lately. He was fine with that.
We spoke on Sunday, he wanted to know when we'd be at his house. I
told him I didn't know because she gets up anywheres between 7:30 and
9:00. Again, all was fine. I was to call before I left Monday
morning.
On Monday morning I woke up 7:30, Angeline was sound asleep. I got
up at 8:00 and took my shower then ate breakfast.
AT 8:43 David called from Danvers (a good 20 minutes from his house)
to say he had partied too hardy the night before and hadn't driven
home. He would be heading home shortly. I told him I was getting her
stuff ready for the day and would get her up when I was done. He was
to call when he got home. If I answered, I would tell him when I was
leaving, if he got the machine - we'd be on our way.
I woke Angeline up at nine. I dressed her, fed her, she threw it all up,
I cleaned her, dressed her again, and was walking out the door at 10:00
when he called.
He wanted to keep her until 6:00 or 7:00 because he didn't feel the
4 or 5 hours he would have her (he lives an hour away - so I had an
hour's drive to bring her up, and he had an hour's drive to bring her
back) was long enough. I should have gotten her up earlier and gotten
her up there. I deliberately let her sleep because I was trying to
keep her away from him. I'm playing head games and trying to
manipulate everything. I think I was also a couple of names too.
I tried to reason with him...pointed out he has never made any attempt
to see her on a weekend, let alone gotten up early to do it. The
majority of his visits with her have not been even four hours long, by
his choice. This is the first time she's been up there, he should be
patient and let the longer visits come. She'd been a b*tch since I
woke her up at 9:00, let alone if I woke her earlier. I tried to talk
him into still having her come up, but he would have nothing to do
with it.
I was determined to ruin his day with her and that's that. He hung
up on me and I haven't heard from him since.
Now I'm assuming he's coming home from New Jersey this weekend and
planning on seeing her on his assigned Monday. This is a big assumption
because he has only done that twice since he started working down there
back at the end of April/beginning of May. The Monday before Memorial
day, he was home but didn't have time to see her. I suggested as he was
driving down 495 on Monday evening, I'd drive down from Nashua to Chelmsford
and meet him at a restaurant so he could at least have an hour or so
with her on his way down. He was most appreciative of that and we
had a nice visit.
But this week, I'm the bad guy trying to keep his daughter away from
him. I tell you, I just can't win.
ARen't you glad you asked?
cj *->
|
918.66 | Can't win.. | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Jun 02 1995 16:41 | 21 |
| Roberta,
You know what hurts through all this? Last week, the day I wound
up driving Angeline to see him at the restaurant, I had mailed to
him that morning a card from Angeline. I mailed it to his New
Jersey address because I knew he was in the middle of a two week
span away from her at that time. I put in some new pictures of her
and traced her hand print in it. It was a card saying "Even though
we're far apart, we're still together in our hearts". Signed it
Angeline and the old xoxoxo thing.
Of course, we didn't know we were seeing him that night, but I just
wanted to cushion the span for him, because he does miss her when
he doesn't come see her. He had already received that long before
this crap this past Monday.
This is the manipulative b*tch trying to keep him away from his
daughter. I should be run out of town I'm so evil.
cj *->
|
918.67 | | MROA::DUPUIS | | Mon Jun 05 1995 11:19 | 22 |
| Hi CJ
I can feel your pain.....I know alot of what you have written first
hand :*( I have two little girls whose Dad is good about keeping his
scheduled visitation days, but when the girls ask to spend more time
with him, he assumes it would be to help me out and God forbid he
should do that. So he constantly makes up excuses as to why he cannot
take them. I say the Serenity Prayer alot and just tell him and myself,
that it's up to him to secure his palce in their hearts and lives. I
do my part by making them available and being as flexible as possible
and NEVER saying a negative word about him in their presence.
My divorce was two years ago and my girls are now six and eight. My
relationship with my ex is still strained, but seems to improve slowly.
Last week out of the blue he called and wanted to take the girls for
ice cream and hang out with him for a couple of hours. It meant alot
to the girls and I was happy for the three of them. I just hope he
continues to surprise them.
My thoughts are with you....this too shall pass....
Roberta
|
918.68 | Perhaps mediation??? | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Thu Jun 08 1995 15:56 | 48 |
| Well, we've had a real brouhaha this week, and I'll admit...I got
down and scrapped like some silly alley cat myself this time. It
was all very stupid and non-productive. I've always felt that at
some time in every relationship you "scrap" a bit, but it shouldn't
be done destructively. Like, name calling, and saying things just
to hurt or deliberately make someone mad. But this has even gone
beyond me and I sunk to his level.
Now since Tuesday night (the absolutely stupid phone argument night)
I've been trying to figure out how the hell to get this all on an
even keel. Tell me how this sounds:
a. I have a "free consultation" with a lawyer next week. This is
only for him to give me an idea of what the judges are currently
leaning toward in NH these days. Everyone tells me their own
thoughts on what could happen, I'm going to find out from someone
who sees it all the time. This way I can find if the things I am
requesting would be judged unreasonable or not. Obviously I do not
feel I am. But David just as adamantly feels I'm out destroy any
possible relationship he could ever have with "his daughter".
b. I've called around to find out information on couple counseling.
I've found someone who is geographically located between David and
I and they allow my insurance, so the cost would only be the co-pay.
I like the approach she has suggested taking to the counseling. I
want to present this to David and see if he will please, please,
please, attend a few sessions and see if some mediation will get us
past this mess. The problem is, this particular person is a woman,
and I expect he'll refuse to go to any woman. So I'm going to call
around a bit more and try to find a male counselor as a back-up in
case David pulls his sexist attitude. When I called the place, they
have a generic "association" name and listed both a male and female
counselor, but I got the female on the phone. Perhaps I can just
ask that we see the male instead.
c. In counseling I'll suggest the visitation scheduling follows the
guidelines that seem to be set these days in court. If they don't
agree with what I want, I will acknowledge that. (It'll kill me,
but I'll acknowledge that ;-> ).
If he refuses to do the counseling, which is very likely, I don't know
what I'll do from there. But I do not believe I will ever initiate any
court action myself. Heck, there's no way I can afford it. I just
want to try to get some sense into this mess.
What do you think? Shall we start laying odds on what David will say?
cj *->
|
918.69 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Thu Jun 08 1995 16:58 | 35 |
|
Cj,
I hate to say this, but you can't fix his problem - if
he really cares about his kid, HE not you, should try harder.
If he chooses partying over seeing his kid, then let him be.
You don't have to go out of your way to accomodate him, HE
has to grow up and be responsible. You stick to the scheduled
visitations, if he misses for a valid reason such as car
problems, then it is fair to reschedule. But, under no
circumstances, IMO, should staying out too late, having a
hangover, etc, be an excuse. It is a good idea to find out
your rights, but no matter how good your intentions are,
you cannot make him into a responsible father. The higher
your expectations, the more disappointed you will get. IMO,
couple counseling is useless. It has nothing to do with you!
If he can't even discipline himself so that he can see his
kid the next day, then maybe you should accept the fact that
he is not going to be the kind of father to your daughter that
you dream about ;-(. It takes much much more than what he's
done to be a parent. Anyone who is fertile can have kids, but
it takes committment, discipline, maturity, humility to be a
parent. IMO, forget about the propaganda and fads, "rights"
have to be earned. From what I read, he does not deserve them,
not just because your daughter had some of his genes.
I'm sorry that I come across so negative, but, IMO, he
has to do much more to earn your duaghter's trust and respect
and YOU cannot teach him that!
Eva
|
918.70 | good points... | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Thu Jun 08 1995 17:21 | 36 |
| Eva,
A lot of what you say is valid Eva. I think I'm persuing the
counseling because I'm hoping someone can help him see that I'm
not manipulative, unreasonable, controlling...etc. It may not
work, but we have two totally opposite opinions of what is
happening here.
He DOES want his daughter to know him as a father. He's extremely
hurt by the fact that she knows (and really loves :-) my 16 year
old nephew better than him. Of course, I had to throw at him that's
his fault, which could have gone unsaid, but it's true. I am not
trying to make him into anything, I'm trying to encourage his efforts
to make it better. But he sees how that *should* be done and nothing
else can sway him. He feels I cannot compromise. I only want to see
his apartment and meet the girlfriend out of my own sick jealousy.
I know I can't, and no one else can, ever change him. I just want to
see if someone can cast a little stronger light on things with him.
AND me. I'm not expecting to find out I'm blameless. But when he
accuses me of having bad feelings, I agree. I say, "yes, David, I
don't want her to go stay with you and your girlfriend. I'm only
human! I don't like it a bit. But I know it has to be. I would not
try to prevent it. I'm not trying to make it harder. But of course,
I don't like it!". Of course I'm still hurt! I'm learning to live
with that. I can't snap my fingers and make it go away. But I swear,
I do not let it interfere with his seeing Angeline. It may not help
us in getting along, this hurt of mine, but I never let come between
them.
So, Eva, I'll take you as one vote against the counseling, :-) That's
fine. You still have good points that I appreciate.
cj *->
|
918.71 | | TLE::C_STOCKS | Cheryl Stocks | Thu Jun 08 1995 17:24 | 13 |
| cj,
As I understand the terms (maybe not too well!), what you could use is
a mediator rather than a counselor. A counselor would be helpful if you
were trying to fix the relationship (which sounds broken beyond repair,
to me), whereas a mediator would be a non-biased third party who could
guide your discussions/negotiations with the dad. That would let you
concentrate on what is acceptable to you, without having to also try
to be the unbiased moderator at the same time (too much to ask of one
person).
Good luck - I'm very sorry to hear things are going so badly right now.
cheryl
|
918.72 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Thu Jun 08 1995 17:31 | 10 |
|
Cj,
> against counseling...
I am not a voter here ;-) I just don't want to see you hurt,
over and over again. ;-(
Eva
|
918.73 | just what I was trying to say! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Thu Jun 08 1995 17:41 | 25 |
| Cheryl,
YES, YES, THAT'S IT! :-) That is much better wording than I can
come up with. The "mediator" I spoke with said she'd like to approach
this as how to get us communicating now. Iron out this visitation
issue, get an established schedule. See, we can't do that on our own.
She does not want to address past issues. There certainly is no
fixing our relationship-past, but we have to establish a better
relationship-future. Someone to calmly suggest what *might* work.
Eva,
I appreciate your concern. I'm trying to be less hurt too. You know,
I have noticed that I honestly and truly do not love him anymore. Now,
that has only evolved over the past couple of months, at least to the
point where I do recognize it as fact. But in losing the love, I'm
losing some of the caring. Demonstrated by the way I acted on the
phone. It is not like me to get into a screaming "you're a this, and
you're a that" match, complete with slamming down phones. So damned
ridiculous, that I'm embarrassed. This could only happen by my not
only losing love, but losing respect. Respect is an extremely
important thing to me. He has hurt me the most by not respecting me.
I can not like you, but I'll respect you until you cause me to lose it.
cj *->
|
918.74 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Thu Jun 08 1995 17:47 | 14 |
|
Cj,
After all the negatives, ;-), is there a possiblity of
finding a mature male friend or relative to talk to David?
Does he have someone who he looks up to and whom you trust
to talk to? It is one thing hear something from a professional
and another thing hearing that from someone he knows who
cares about his well being. Like an uncle or godfather or
something? Even a mature woman relative whom he respects
may work too.
Eva
|
918.75 | | MROA::DUPUIS | | Fri Jun 09 1995 09:11 | 12 |
| Cj -- It never ends does it???? I agree with the last couple of notes
regarding a mediator. I hope it works. One thing you might want to
start doing is keeping a journal of when a visit was supposed to take
place and what transpired to keep the visit from happening, so you have
some documentation as to what really has happened (at least from your
perspective).
Keep your chin up and try the Serenity Prayer, I recite it religiously
for my own sanity in the visitation battle I'm going through. Some
days it helps and other days, well......
Roberta
|
918.76 | I wish we could! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Jun 09 1995 09:14 | 38 |
| Eva,
I tried to get him to do that back in the beginning of my
pregnancy. He was torn about what he wanted to do and it
was eating him up. I hated seeing him so upset. I knew
he needed to talk, but he does not "talk" and never has.
We discussed that and I finally was able to make him see
he needed to. He has a friend who is a truly wonderful man,
Drew. I suggested Drew. I knew he'd be impartial and a very
fair man. David did call Drew and met up with him, but was
never able to bring himself to talk about. Drew tried to
encourage it a bit, but it was a no-go.
He does have another friend, Chris, that he told me he used
to talk to about all that "stuff" after the no-go with Drew.
But I think the substance of his problems then was different from
now. He really didn't want to be a part-time Dad, but couldn't
stay with me. I think his "talking" now would be more of a,
"Cindy's being a b*tch. She won't let me see my daughter". Someone
else hearing this would be giving him all the advice on how to
"straighten" me out, or maybe legal advice. There's no common
person between us that could objectively see both sides.
That's why I chose a third party that knows neither of us and will
just look at the facts.
David is not a people person. He doesn't establish close relationships
with many people and can't discuss his feelings. I gave him a lot of
credit for even "trying" to talk to Drew, and eventually talking to
Chris. I don't see that happening this time though because he does
not see himself as being/doing any wrong at all now. For him, this
is not a decision to be made, but seems to be a battle to be won.
Thanks so much for this conversing though. It is quite helpful when
I see my own thoughts in writing, let alone yours.
cj *->
|
918.77 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | proud counter-culture McGovernik | Fri Jun 09 1995 10:17 | 22 |
| cj,
This is just my opinion and it isn't going to be really supportive,
please take it in the light of someone who has been there.
I have problems believing a person really wants to be a "dad" when he
parties too hardy to meet the agreed on time table and requirements, is
constantly trying to change the rules, and is still trying to
manipulate you like he could when you actually cared for him.
It really feels to me, from what you have written that he is trying to
make visitation into another tool to control you, and your actions,
more than seeing his child. While I think you would like to think he
really wants to be more involved in your child's life, and reacted out
of disappointment when HE didn't meet HIS commitments around the last
visitation, I see it more as another way to mess around with a toy he
can't have any more.
Yes see a mediator, and yes, get counseling for yourself so you can
learn to deal with this person.
Meg
|
918.78 | Such food for thought! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Jun 09 1995 11:25 | 24 |
| Meg,
You know, you may have just said the same things that other notes
have tried to say. Maybe it was something in the wording, but
suddenly you've opened up a whole other thought for me. I hadn't
really considered at all that I might be the one trying to BE
controlled. I have been fighting so hard against his accusations
that I'm so manipulative and controlling and detrimental to his
relationship (and not just with his daughter...oh no, I've cost
him "other" friendships too!), that I never really did consider
perhaps someone was trying to control me.
This is definitely something for me to chew on a bit. Let's just
hope we don't create a monster here! :-) :-)
Actually, it would be a very good point for me to have in mind
with future dealings. And I mean that quite literally, I will not
use it as a tool or weapon. Just as something for myself to refect
on when things go awry.
I can't tell you how much I hope he'll go to the counselling, but
if he doesn't, I think perhaps I should anyways. I just don't
want anything to be one sided.
cj *->
|
918.79 | | CDROM::BLACHEK | | Fri Jun 09 1995 12:07 | 12 |
| When you approach him with the counselor, I'd call it family
counseling, rather than couples. Since he already has accused you of
jealousy toward his new girlfriend.
It's maybe not even family, since you are not exactly living as a
family. But it is your daughter's family, and I think you should
approach this as a positive for her.
Good luck with all of this. I think you are consistently trying to do
the right thing for her and I give you a *lot* of credit.
judy
|
918.80 | Soap opera update | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Wed Jul 12 1995 16:13 | 51 |
| Well, things didn't get much better for some time with father and
I. He hasn't been to see her, and various problems have arisen
with us.
Two weeks ago I finally sent him a letter (certified) stating his
hostilities and accusations have made communication between us
impossible. I brought up the subject of counseling, recommended
the one I had spoke to, provided him with the criteria that I chose
them on, and gave him the number to call for information himself.
It was not given as an ultimatum, only as a suggestion for us to
receive mediation and get the visitation issue settled and some of
this fighting over.
The letter also stated, until we do resolve present issues, his
visitation will remain on Mondays, as previously agreed. I would
not allow calls from him TELLING me when he was "coming to get her".
Also, he has to call 24hrs in advance to confirm/cancel he is coming
on any given Monday. He also has to call the sitter in the morning
giving her an hours notice when he will be coming. This was to prevent
further conflicts with her plans with the other children for the day.
(We ran into his "no-showing" on the last Monday he said he'd come
get her. Sitter and all the other children couldn't go anywhere or
do anything because no one knew when her father was coming).
Well...anyways to sum it all up. I sent the letter, and got absolutely
no response from him for two weeks. I'm figuring he's off trying to
scrape up the dough to see a lawyer, or something is up. Anyway, I
called this past Monday night to tell him it's time to send me some
more support checks (he sends five postdated ones at a time). I'm
expecting World War 43 (we're up to at least that now).... and guess
what????
HE'S AGREED TO THE COUNSELING!!!!! He even brought it up in the
conversation himself! I expect someone, somewhere, probably talked
him into it, but hey - he's going. I told him in the letter that
it was not counseling to get us back together, or make us "friends".
That it was not "couple counseling" (thanks to previous noters!)
because we are not a couple. It was just a means to get a set
visitation schedule and get a working relationship going here for
our daughter's sake.
Now, don't think I'm doing jigs and dancing all around. This whole
issue is too sad for rejoicing, but it's a start in getting (hopefully)
some peace, even if temporary, back in our lives.
He is not going to be coming home from NJ for another two or three
weeks (working overtime to make much needed money). But said as soon
as he gets back, he'll call and we can schedule. So I even get a
bonus few more weeks without him in my hair!!! :-) :-) :-) The
best news of all.
cj *->
|
918.81 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | proud counter-culture McGovernik | Wed Jul 12 1995 16:17 | 6 |
| cj,
I am glad that a letter at least got things started in the right
direction. Hang in there.
meg
|
918.82 | | MROA::DUPUIS | | Thu Jul 13 1995 10:22 | 3 |
| CJ -- I'm wishing you and Angeline the best.
Roberta
|
918.83 | Warning: venting ahead! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Dec 12 1995 13:15 | 125 |
| Sorry for the length on this. I really need some venting today.
Please just pass it over if you aren't "into this" today. :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, some things change, some stay the same.
David, not getting his way, eventually went to a lawyer to have him
act as a mediator between us (he backed out of the going to a
counselor) to "put on paper" a reasonable visiting schedule. The
lawyer and I have been communicating for a little over a month now.
They asked, and with some work to initial suggestions, I agreed to
an every other Saturday schedule, with overnights to be worked in
later. I had requested he take Angeline on Fridays (his work week
has changed again so now he works Monday to Thursday, with Friday
through Sunday off), but they would not agree to Fridays. While
discussing the "every other week" thing I had mentioned I'd be glad
to let him take her every week if it were on Fridays and he could be
consistent. I also backed off the 5:30 return time, and now she has
to be home by 7:00 (they had asked for 8:00, we wound up at 7:00).
Well, as I said, we wound up with every other Saturday. He has the
option of seeing her the alternating Fridays, but he must call me
on Tuesday's to confirm each week what he is doing. I guess he works
overtime on some Friday's so he doesn't want to be committed to coming
on those.
I had also asked while we are putting the visitation "on paper" I
also wanted to get the support set and on paper also. The support
I was getting was not enough, we dickered and now it is set at what
I asked for. This has caused delays in getting the visitation "down
on paper", but we started the visitations according to the verbal
agreement. David will not start the added support until all other
details are worked out. (READ: "rent a child mentality" He'll pay
more once he knows he can see her more, which he always could anyways,
he just doesn't).
So the first Saturday, all goes well. The next Friday, all goes well.
What should have been the next Saturday, he called on Tuesday and
changed to Friday. Ok, fine with me. He called on Thursday night
and said he couldn't make Friday either. So he did not see her that
weekend. Then the next weekend, should have been his Friday visit, he
couldn't make that. So he has not seen her now for the past two weeks.
Now, I'm going to get to the point of why I'm writing today, because
I'm a tad upset and it has to do with dealing with his lawyer. This
guy has got to see so much garbage flung from one person to another,
I know. I realize he's probably "seen it all". But it still upsets
me, I should say "insults" me when he makes some comments to me.
Example: I asked for $xxx.00 for support. He worked the numbers
according to Massachusetts guidelines and came up with $5.00 less than
what I had asked for. Now, without going too deep into it, I can
question the payroll check David provided him because he has irregular
hours. His payroll check does not show what his hourly wage is, or
what that particular check covers for hours. I think another check,
worked through the numbers, might come up with more. I did not push
this issue. I simply stated that I didn't agree entirely with his
numbers, but felt $5.00 more should not kill David. The lawyer comes
back with "If the numbers had come up with a higher figure, you know
you'd be asking for that!" (said really snide). This ticked me off.
I told him, "I realize you are used to those circumstances, but I am
not like that. I'm a person of my word. I asked for $xxx.00 because
I think that is fair. I did not ask for more because I do not entirely
agree with the support that courts instate. I feel it can be
ridiculous in some cases". He backed off and got "nice" again.
Now the lawyer and I (so far, I'm still representing myself, but have
gotten some good input from NOTES and a 2 hour consultation with
another lawyer), are having a go-round for the overnights. DAvid
wants them to start up in three months time. A lot of courts are
setting the overnights at two years old, mostly if circumstances call
for it. I feel ours does (and so does the lawyer I consulted) because
of Angeline's still frequent vomitting and David's sleeping so soundly.
David is adamant against waiting until she's two (which is next Sept).
Which I say, "ok". I'm not going to hardline on that.
So the lawyer calls today to discuss when they should start. He wants
it in three months from now. I told him I thought five months would
be a better time frame. He asked if we could compromise then on four
months. I told him I had already compromised what I wanted and came
up with five months. He comes back with "compromised from what? Six
months?". AGain, snide.
Now I'm a bit pissed. I mean, this is all a very upsetting mess to
start with. I do all I can to keep my head above water and deal with
it. I'm trying to keep from getting too upset, and deal with the times
I have to be parted from my daughter. Forgive me for a minor pity
party, but do I DESERVE TO BE TREATED LIKE THIS??? Talked to like
that???? Should I have to???? No, normally my lawyer (who I'm sure
would at least be getting a bit more respect) would have to deal with
it. But I can't afford a lawyer. I'll never be able to borrow the
money, and have to slowly pay it back. I'm barely getting by now on
what I bring home. I can't afford to start having more deductions to
go to a lawyer.
And, in the same token, I have not done a damn thing to show myself to
be an unfair, unreasonable, troublesome person. I ENCOURAGED the
agreement to change to weekly visits as opposed to bi-weekly, and that
shocked his lawyer! So why have such a hard time treating me with some
respect?
He has already seen his own client bounce a check on me and now miss
two weeks in a row for visits, in just one month's time. HELLO???? Is
this the poor mistreated Daddy that the wicked witch won't let see his
daughter?????
I know, I know...this is most likely not the arena for this. I know
I should be over in some other file where everyone is miserable over
their divorce/custody battles. It's just, the feeling and responses
here are warmer. Whether for or against what I'm saying, they're a lot
more helpful.
And I guess all I really need is a couple of "keep the chin up"'s right
now. I shouldn't have let some faceless "suit" get to me like this,
but I guess it just hurts a bit to be treated like some awful,
vindictive person who he thinks deserves this.
Ok, well, thank for your time. I had to get that off my chest because
it's in a big knot and I don't want it to well up in those stupid tears
that are just dying to take over and say "poor me". I have a beautiful
daughter waiting for me to pick her up today, and I really couldn't be
"richer". Sure would be nice if I was "taxed" less ;->
cj *->
|
918.84 | | SHRCTR::DJANCAITIS | only1thingkeepingmehere | Tue Dec 12 1995 13:37 | 15 |
| cj *->
all I can say *is* "chin up" and enjoy your daughter and the times
with her - with the holidays coming up, you really don't *need* this
added grief, so get as much *joy* out of the season with her as
you can.......
as for her dad, I assume (think I read elsewhere) you're keeping a
journal of missed visits/late calls/etc. ?? Keep track, stick to
your guns and remember (even if *he* doesn't) that you're trying to
do what's right for YOUR DAUGHTER, not what's right for you or to put
it "to" him.......
best of luck,
Debbi
|
918.85 | | STOWOA::RYAN_J | | Tue Dec 12 1995 13:38 | 22 |
| cj,
Keep your chin up! :)
You are doing a great job in a tough situation.
No, you do not deserve to be treated with anything less than full
respect by the lawyer - can I suggest one thing?
Don't put up with it!
Easy for me to say, perhaps tough for you to do...
Call the lawyer on his snide remarks, interrupt him and ask why he is
being this way (jerk) - list the visitation schedule that you proposed,
etc.
Ask him to stop treating you this way, to be nice or ask that he
contact you in the future when he can be nice - then hang up.
Good luck,
JR
|
918.86 | | LETHE::TERNULLO | | Tue Dec 12 1995 13:45 | 18 |
|
cj,
Hang in there. You're doing GREAT!!! It sounds like such a
difficult situation and that you are being as reasonable as
possible, it almost sounds like you might be being too reasonable
and the lawyer might be taking advantage of that and working on
your emotions (remember he's not working for you and your ex -
he's only working for your ex).
Try keep a smile on your face, it sounds like your really enjoying
your daughter. And if you feel like you need to, hit the ladies
room and have a good cry, you wouldn't be the first one.
We're with you :)
Karen T.
|
918.87 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Dec 12 1995 14:39 | 17 |
|
Cj,
You are doing great in such a tough situation. It is definitely
frustrating when you are trying to play nice and fair, and the other
team has different priorities! Well, maybe it helps to remember that
this lawyer is acting on David's behalf, representing David's interest,
protecting David's wallet; so, it is not meant to be personal (nothing
against you personally). I mean, it would be nice if the lawyer was
more "human"...
Hang in there.
Eva
|
918.88 | | CSC32::BROOK | | Tue Dec 12 1995 15:39 | 19 |
| Remember too that this lawyer is used to dealing with other lawyers ... and
they can and do pass these snide remarks back and forth ... and they have
the tough skin to ignore it because it is not personal ...
So, he's probably treating you as if you were another lawyer.
I'd ask him point blank to have him treat you with more respect, and remind him
that if he doesn't you will be forced to engage a lawyer who will no doubt
seek and probably get more support for you and your child in order to help pay
for the new lawyer ... when his client will lose even more.
Remember too, that while the lawyer is your ex's attorney, and representing
him, he also has a few vested interests ... the longer this drags out, the
more he makes ...
Try to detach yourself from you ex-spouse when talking to your lawyer ... it
may help ... refer to him as "your client". "When your cleint is willing"
Good luck
|
918.89 | Easier said then done, though | APSMME::PENDAK | picture packin' momma | Tue Dec 12 1995 15:44 | 4 |
| You could also interrupt him, ask him to repeat his last statement,
tell him when he can speak to you as a professional and with respect
you'll be able to take his call but until that happens you simply will
do not have the time to deal with him.
|
918.90 | | GIDDAY::BURT | DPD (tm) | Tue Dec 12 1995 16:59 | 4 |
| Presumably the lawyer will be getting paid whether he is unpleasant or
pleasant. Maybe you should ask if he gets a bonus for being nasty? :^)
\C
|
918.91 | | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Wed Dec 13 1995 08:40 | 45 |
| Hi Folks,
I'm feeling better this a.m. I guess I just did a little dip there
yesterday.
Thanks for the notes on and off line. The last couple (concerning
dealing with the lawyer) gave me good food for thought. Both times
he spoke to me that way, I corrected what he was implying, but
perhaps I should suggest the comments not be made to start with.
I spoke with David last night. In keeping with the schedule (that is
not yet written), this Saturday would be his day. I called to ask him
if he could take her either Friday or Sunday because something has come
up for us on Saturday. He said Friday is no good, and he can't tell me
about Sunday until tonight (he has to check with his girlfriend and she
works nights, so he has to call her today). But he made it clear that
if Sunday wasn't good, then he's taking her Saturday.
I'm thinking, "hey, for a month I've been honoring an agreement that
isn't even done yet. He won't consider giving me the support I asked
for until this agreement is done. He's been keeping her the longer
hours that the agreement calls for, but has not come more than twice
in the month the agreement has been "verbal". Is he going to turn
around now and say "hey, it's my Saturday""!!!!!! I sincerely hope
not. Regardless of what's finally agreed on on paper, there is
always going to have to be some give and take.
This is all such a lesson on how things break down and get ugly when
people are going through divorce/custody battles. I think perhaps it's
just a slow build up of all these "clashes" that you just get so sick
of the other person and dealing with all this bull.
And to think, just a year ago I couldn't imagine how I could ever stop
loving this man. I couldn't see how I'd ever get over him. And that
was even after he walked, and after he'd moved in with the girlfriend.
It's the way he's talked to me and treated me since last winter that
has slowly dragged out and destroyed every feeling I had for him.
I can see how people do become so vicious and vindictive...this stuff
HURTS!
Do me a favor, give me a slap up the side of the head if you notice
me getting nasty, ok? :-) And thanks for the good feelings.
cj *->
|
918.92 | | CSC32::BROOK | | Wed Dec 13 1995 12:18 | 23 |
| > I'm thinking, "hey, for a month I've been honoring an agreement that
> isn't even done yet. He won't consider giving me the support I asked
> for until this agreement is done. He's been keeping her the longer
> hours that the agreement calls for, but has not come more than twice
> in the month the agreement has been "verbal". Is he going to turn
> around now and say "hey, it's my Saturday""!!!!!! I sincerely hope
> not. Regardless of what's finally agreed on on paper, there is
> always going to have to be some give and take.
This is why you have written agreements and why people try to stick to the
letter of the agreement ... it helps eliminate the very conflicts that
you are suffering from. It is a very lucky couple who separate with enough
goodwill to permit the kind of flexibility that you seem to be hoping for,
and hence why lawyers get involved.
You have to treat each Saturday on its own merits ... He takes the child,
or doesn't take the child. You cannot use it as a day to day tool to
change days or anything like that. All you can do is use it in court in
any future custody matters. If he doesn't take the child then he has forfeited
the opportunity ... it is his loss (and the child's but that is a separate
issue and must be dealt with separately as a custody issue).
Stuart
|
918.93 | | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Wed Dec 13 1995 12:28 | 21 |
| Stuart,
I'm not sure, but I think you're saying that given you finally have
a settled agreement, you shouldn't be flexible from there?
I mean, if some week he can't make it on Saturday, and asks for Sunday.
I feel if I have no plans that would conflict with, I should consider
letting her go on Sunday instead. But I would expect the same in
return. Such as the case of this weekend. I mean, I can at this time
say, "hey, RIGHT NOW, we have no agreement", or I could say, "David,
it could be reversed sometime and you may expect/want me to be more
understanding".
I feel you, Stuart (and a note I got off-line), are saying that type
of reasoning is just not going to happen? or work? Perhaps not
allowing changes is the only way to peace?
I'm thinking things like, birthdays, family events, etc.. There must
be some leeway in my opinion, but am I being naive?
cj *->
|
918.94 | | SHRCTR::DJANCAITIS | only1thingkeepingmehere | Wed Dec 13 1995 12:40 | 16 |
| cj *->
I think (and what others may be saying, but I can't interpret for them)
is that, altho' flexibility is nice and would be most gracious (especially
under the circumstances !!) on your part, you can't "guarantee" that he'll
be "flexible" in return - if *you* want to operate that way, out of
goodness to your daughter, I think that's commendable, but *don't* count
on it from him - you can only expect to "hold" him to the written agreement
and hope for the best if the situation occurs.........
if it were me, I'd probably try to do what you're doing, but after 2 or 3
sessions of "inflexibility" on his part, I'd probably say "tough luck"
next time he asked *you* to be flexible !
hugs,
Debbi
|
918.95 | | CSC32::BROOK | | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:22 | 10 |
| I think this is essentially right ... if both parties are co-operative, then
the agreement on paper is not of particular significance, except in emergency.
In the case of non-co-operation, then the agreement is vital. And, it is
probably important to stick with the agreement in the case one party or the
uses violations of the agreement in future potential custody battles, because
they can cause a lot of grief ...
Stuart
|
918.96 | I hear you! | AD::JACQUART | | Wed Dec 13 1995 16:14 | 59 |
| I've been reading this notesfile for awhile, and I finally feel the
'need' to post a reply...probably to commiserate more than offer help.
Don't know what to suggest about the lawyer thing. I just went to
court in November (lawyer was even a 'friend') to try to get the
support that was set five years ago raised. My ex (who works for
a company in which his father is his boss) showed up with a letter
from his company saying that miraculously enough overtime had just
been stopped. Mind you I'd originally requested a modification about
nine months prior to when he finally made it to court, and this letter
was dated the day prior to the court appearance. My ex's prior year
income was $9K more than he now claims to make, and his year-to-date
salary info as of November was about $7K more than he claims to make.
BUT....my lawyer, and his lawyer, and the court, chose to believe his
story about overtime being gone AND they said that unless I was looking
at a 20% increase they wouldn't modify the amount anyway. All I was
able to do was get an agreement to exchange W2's at the end of each
year, and then I get a percentage of any overtime he's worked (which
is LESS than the percentage of his income I am entitled to based on
state guidelines...supposedly so that he will have an incentive to work
overtime if it's offered). Now my ex is a field service tech...
and most weekends when he has the girls (who are 9 and 10) they tell
me he had to work. I plan to wait for a W2, and then find a new lawyer
to go back to court and prove that the ex lied through his teeth.
About visitation and flexibility - like I said, I have two daughters
aged 9 and 10 and have been separated/divorced for almost six years.
After 8 years of marriage, he walked for another woman whom he is
now married to. I did EVERYTHING to make this amicable from the
beginning - and I've gotten nothing but grief for it. From day one
we've had an every-other-weekend visit schedule, from Friday night
to Sunday night. He has played games with cancelling when he was
mad at me in the past, but has done so less frequently since the girls
have gotten older (probably because he now has to explain his absence
to them). He also have five weeks in the summer. Last year
the girls decided not to go back for the second half of their summer
visit - and I supported them provided that they told him themselves
that they didn't want to go. Well - I got dragged into court by him
over that one - and I was informed that the girls were not old enough
to make their own decision and that if he had visitation it was his
right to exercise it (basically regardless of whether or not I had
to put the girls into his car kicking and screaming)...and he was
given an extra week for the next three summer to recoup his lost
time. Since that incident (which by the way the ex never discussed
with me - the court summons simply appeared in my mailbox one day)
I am VERY hesitant to be 'flexible' around visitation. The girls
are fortunately old enough to understand what the court's decision
was, so even if they don't really want to go they know that my hands
are essentially tied.
I can only hope that the situation with your ex shows more promise than
mine has exhibited. But my overarching advice is don't do ANYTHING to
try to make HIS life easier, especially if it's not being reciprocated.
Just do the best you can for your daughter - and do your best to keep
her sheltered from the ugliness behind the scenes.
Chin Up!
/Sue
|
918.97 | Changing table/bureau & where to buy needed please | DZIGN::BIBEAULT | | Tue May 14 1996 14:53 | 10 |
| Hi,
My wife and I are trying to find a suitable piece of furniture to use
as a changing table as well as a bureau for our first that is due in
about six weeks. Does anyone have any recommendations as to what to
buy and or where to buy it. The southcentral or eastern MA area or RI
is preferable.
Thanks.
Marc
|
918.98 | Check "Want Ad" mag | MAL009::MAGUIRE | | Wed May 15 1996 07:10 | 4 |
| Check out that Want Ad magazine for baby items. It usually has some
pretty good stuff. I think the new issue is in the stores on Tuesdays.
Lorraine
|
918.99 | Spags | BIGQ::ZUIDEMA | I sEe thE WoRld THRU blood SHot EYEs | Wed May 15 1996 16:16 | 7 |
| We picked a real nice double dresser (also used as a changing table)
from Spags in Worcester and also picked up a matching bureau....very reasonable
priced for the quality of the furniture. The dresser is about waist high
and double so it has 6 drawers...3 on each side.
Works out great.
Andy
|
918.100 | thanks for the tips! | DZIGN::BIBEAULT | | Wed May 15 1996 16:58 | 7 |
| Thanks for the tips! We have the Want Ads and Spags sounds like a
great idea too. My wife seems to also have heard of some kind of
discounted (kids?) furniture store in Framingham but we're not from the
area and not familiar with anything much around there.
Thanks!
Marc
|
918.101 | Burlington Coat Factory has good baby stuff | DECWIN::MCCARTNEY | | Wed May 15 1996 17:40 | 8 |
| Several years ago we got one from Burlington Coat Factory that is a
double wide with 3 wide drawers. It is maple colored (we did not want
white!). The pad is held onto the top by a strap that snaps inside the
top drawer and on the back. So, when we're done with diapers we can
toss the strap and pad and still have a piece of furniture that doesn't
look like it belongs to a baby.
Irene
|
918.102 | the survey says.... | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Sep 17 1996 16:05 | 21 |
918.103 | But how do you prevent it? | BGSDEV::PENDAK | picture packin' momma | Tue Sep 17 1996 16:16 | 19 |
918.104 | | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Tue Sep 17 1996 16:23 | 19 |
918.105 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Sep 17 1996 16:34 | 6 |
918.106 | | BGSDEV::PENDAK | picture packin' momma | Tue Sep 17 1996 16:35 | 15 |
918.107 | | HAZMAT::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Tue Sep 17 1996 17:18 | 57 |
918.108 | | BGSDEV::PENDAK | picture packin' momma | Tue Sep 17 1996 17:37 | 21 |
918.109 | | HAZMAT::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Tue Sep 17 1996 17:47 | 8 |
918.110 | | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Wed Sep 18 1996 09:38 | 17 |
918.111 | have him talk to the pediatrician | TLE::DECC::SEIGEL | | Wed Sep 18 1996 14:25 | 1 |
918.112 | | SCAMP::MINICHINO | | Thu Sep 19 1996 12:47 | 12 |
918.113 | guess the SO said it's ok..;-> | CBROWN::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Thu Jan 30 1997 10:49 | 24 |
| I just got off the phone and had to chuckle. Had to share this
with those of you who have been here and "there" for me since
this wonderful story all began.
Angeline and I are going to the aquarium in Boston on Saturday.
I invited her father to come with us, and he just called to confirm
he's coming!
It basically all came about when he switched his last weekend (which
was last weekend) to a week earlier because he had plans for a party
on Friday night. That left him last weekend and this without seeing
her. I called and asked if he'd like to meet up and go to Boston with
us and then take Angeline on home with him for some extra time with
him..bring her home Sunday. Well, he has plans Saturday night but
he does want to go Saturday.
I just think this is too funny! I mean, I think it will be a great
thing for Angeline because she NEVER has spent time with both her
parents together. At least not to her knowledge. And I know she'll
just love the aquarium. I just can't believe he wants to go!
Life gets funny sometimes, eh?
cj *->
|