T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
873.1 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | My other car is a kirby | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:56 | 17 |
| Tina,
I think we all have fears that a baby might not come out quite right
when we are pregnant or planning a family. As far as chromosonal
anomolies, there are tests available, which can set your mind at rest
should you choose to utilize them.
A discussion with a doctor specializing in these tests can also give
you a list of "odds" to help you make your decisions regarding these
tests.
However, one thing I think we all learn is that life isn't always
perfect. The choice one makes before deciding to have children is to
do some fate acceptance. No matter how perfect we do things, something
can come up and change our lives, its part of being a parent.
meg
|
873.2 | | POWDML::AJOHNSTON | beannachd | Tue Jan 03 1995 14:03 | 24 |
| hi, Tina,
I'll be 40 this Sunday and I'm due to have my child June 7th.
Based on family medical histories, the only known risk factor we face
is my age.
Yes, I worry a bit. And we talked quite a bit about our fears, but I'm
not overly fearful. I was concerned enough to elect to have
amniocentesis, and I am eager to get the results.
Based on your age and the fact that your sister is a Downs individual,
I think you will be strongly encouraged to have an amnio as well.
How do I deal with my fears? It's going to sound very hokey, but: I
maintain a positive outlook, I concentrate on the happy outcomes I
expect, and some days I pray/meditate alot. Also, being the sort of
person I am, I find out as much [and as current] information as I can
about the risks and what the outcomes _really_ mean -- so I can prepare
for whatever comes.
Annie
|
873.3 | 1 fear per day | MONKC::TRIOLO | | Tue Jan 03 1995 14:32 | 11 |
|
A friend of mine taught me the 1 fear/day rule.
I'm usually a very optimistic person but when I was pregnant, the
worry hormone seemed to kick in.
So, I was allowed 1 fear a day. Maybe my child would be blind,
and I would deal with that for a day. Then the next day, I would
deal with a different fear. But ONLY 1 a day.
1 at a time is much easier to deal with.
|
873.4 | IT'S NORMAL | STOWOA::SPERA | | Wed Jan 04 1995 13:34 | 15 |
|
1 fear a day sounds like a good idea.
I think the first step toward parenting is worry. I'm a worrier. I was
so afraid of birth defects it took me forever to decide. So, realize it
is normal and your risks aren't greater than anyone else's.
What you do have to realize is that you'll have to accept some level of
disappointment...not as good in school as...not as pretty as...not as
tall as...not as healthy as...not as "normal" as..not as stable as...
If you can handle all that you will be able to handle anything that
comes your way. if less than perfect scares you, think twice..and twice
again. Parenting is a lot harder than I tought it was going to be.
|
873.5 | tests tests tests | PINION::COLE | | Thu May 18 1995 16:48 | 23 |
| The answer is ... tests, tests, test.
I was 37 when my daughter was conceived ... and Downes Syndrome was
foremost on my mind. Not only is an amnio "strongly recommended" over
age 35, most insurance companies pay 100%, no questions asked. We had
the extra bonus of discovering (while waiting for the results of the
Downes test) that my husband was also a Ta-Sachs carrier ... yet one
more test for me to have while that little baby was just starting to
flutter.
We went so far as to ask what was involved in terminating the pregnancy
- about the last thing I wanted to do, but something we had to consider
if the baby had either Downes Syndrome or Ta-Sachs. (If the baby has
Ta-Sachs it dies within the first 4-5 years, it's a disease similar to
AIDS in that it breaks down the immune system, no cure.)
The bottom line is that despite my age and weight and everything else,
my daughter tested 100% normal. She's now almost a year old now and
the love of my life ... and we wouldn't have had her if we weren't
willing to take the chance. Unfortunately, the risk of Downes
increasing substantially after age 40 (by age 45 it's 1 in 20), but at
age 40 it's still something like 1 in 200 ... which are good odds by my
book. The tests will put your mind at ease - they certainly helped me.
|
873.6 | | STOWOA::STOCKWELL | you gotta put down the duckie | Thu May 18 1995 17:02 | 3 |
|
I never could understand why woman over 35 has a higher risk of having
a DS baby?
|
873.7 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | proud counter-culture McGovernik | Thu May 18 1995 17:17 | 12 |
| The theory is that the eggs are older, and more likely to have been
damaged by a host of things environmental and not. Women are born with
all the undeveloped eggs they will ever make. However, more children
with downs are born to women who are younger, and not at as high a
risk. Guess it is the numbers of children born vs. number of babies
with chromosonal anomolies.
Also another risk factor I was told about was men over 50. Something
simalar, I guess, although sperm manufacturing is supposed to be
ongoing for men from puberty through death.
meg
|
873.8 | Quality Control Systems | GVPROD::BETTINA | | Fri May 19 1995 03:56 | 5 |
|
An other theory is that the "quality control" system is getting worse
with the age of the mother...
|
873.9 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | proud counter-culture McGovernik | Fri May 19 1995 09:59 | 14 |
| i don't know. One very understanding OB I talked to while deciding
whether or not to go with an amnio for Atlehi, also said he felt the
conception rate of "damaged" eggs and sperm were actually much higher
than rated, but women over 35 also have a higher miscarriage rate than
younger women as a rule. he felt that this was because the body
recognized unviable embryos and proceded to deal with them at an early
enough rate that most tests wouldn't catch exactly what happened.
At 37 we opted not to go with an amnio, but both Frank and I come from
a long line of "late" breeders, and we felt we had enough family
history that we wouldn't worryk (much).
meg
meg
|