T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
719.1 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:22 | 14 |
| Several choices ... install a 2nd phoneline that she must pay for ...
if it is available in your area, get the 2nd phone number option for
one line, where each has a distinctive ring ... then you wouldn't
be jumping up all the time to answer her calls.
Charge her 25c per call longer than 5 mins.
Give her say 2 mins to get off the phone when you've told her you need
it, and charge 25c per minute after 2 mins until she gets off.
Charge her 25c for ever call that comes in for her that disrupts your
mealtime.
Stuart
|
719.2 | But there's so MUCH to say! | CLOUD9::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:38 | 10 |
| As a "gabber", I can honestly say that as a teenager, short of standing
me on my head, there was NOTHING that ANYONE could do to make me get
off the phone - unless the option was to see that person, in person.
The only way my mother got her phone back was to allow me and my
boyfriend to be together more. But even then, when we got home, we'd
call each other again ....! I'd opt for phone line #2 that she pays
for!
|
719.3 | | GEEWIZ::BOURQUARD | Deb | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:44 | 35 |
| Yow! I would have owned my parents a mint if I'd been born to .1!!
I'm not the parent of a teenager, but I was a teenager who spent *hours*
on the phone during my high school days. Can you sit down with your daughter
and mutually agree on "rules of the phone" including penalties for breaking
them? Before you do this, you may want to clarify in your own mind what
problem you are trying to solve. For example, is the problem:
- you hate seeing your daughter attached to a receiver
for most of the evening
- you are unable to make calls when you need to
- you aren't receiving your phone calls
- something else entirely...
Your base note sounds like the problem is the first on the list, but I
suspect you'll have more success with your daughter if you can articulate
a problem that she can relate to.
Your daughter may have nothing in common with the teenage me, but here's
my anecdotes: my parents were divorced and remarried so I had 2 homes and
2 sets of parents. One set seemed to arbitrarily get annoyed by my phone
usage and we had no "rules". They would occasionally just tell me to complete
my conversation for no apparent reason. This felt unreasonable to me --
what's wrong with my using the phone if they didn't need it? I didn't
respond particularly well to this.
The other set of parents let me talk as long as I wanted when I wanted.
I responded very well to this :-) When they expected a call, they would
let me know so that I wouldn't hog the line.
At least, that's how I remember it :-)
Good luck!
- Deb
|
719.4 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | stepford specialist | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:55 | 16 |
| Well lets see,
When Lolita was that age, she was restricted to no calls over 15
minutes and no more than two calls an hour during "prime time." We had
some arguments about this, but I paid the phone bill, so those were my
rules. when she comes back from college the same cycle starts up, so
one thing you need to do is get used to the fact that teenagers have a
permanent plastic growth growing out of the side of their heads. The
arghuements about phone usage have gone down over the last couple of
years, but occaisionally they do crank up still.
Oh joy, and I get to go through this again in 6 years, and again in 13!
Meg
|
719.5 | One Solution | NODEX::HOLMES | | Thu Mar 31 1994 18:03 | 14 |
| Neither my older sister nor I were big phone talkers as teenagers, but my
younger sister was. My parents handled it this way :
- They got call-waiting and my sister paid for it.
- If they needed to make a call she had to get off the phone.
- If a call came in for them while she was talking, she had to end her
call and let them take theirs.
Other than that she was free to talk all she wanted. At first, her calls
were limited to 15 minutes at a time. She didn't like that so she was
actually the one who suggested that they get call waiting. She was willing
to pay for it in order to have unlimited length calls.
Tracy
|
719.6 | Phone use can be healthy sign. | CAMONE::ARENDT | Harry Arendt CAM:: | Fri Apr 01 1994 09:01 | 19 |
|
I would like to offer a different perspective. It is entirely possible
that your daughters time on the phone is a very healthy thing and that
the best solution would be to get her a seperate phone line. I recently
read a book on communication differences between men and women, while
broad statements can be misleading I found much sound advise in it.
The book stated that the friendships of males are based on shared experiences
and that womens friendships are based on communication or shared "secrets".
Your daughter is experiencing friendship via your phone. The only trick is
to not allow the phone habit to interfere with the rest of her life particularly
her school work. Also are you aware that you can restrict times for calls
simply by installing a two line controller from radio shack. It works this way,
establish ok calling times say 6pm to 9pm and then simply check the line outside
these times. If your daughter violated the time then simply tell her to
hang up the phone, and then place the dial tone on hold, the phone company will
automatically disable the line until you call to restore it or remove the hold.
The two line controller with hold sells for $30.
|
719.7 | It's a Loooooong Stage | POWDML::WALKER | | Fri Apr 01 1994 09:32 | 24 |
| My son became one with the phone this year, I think it is directly
related to the first year of Jr. High. We have call waiting on the
phone, it allows me to get through when I need too, regardless of who
has the phone in use. With that in mind we have several established
rules.
The first being what are reasonable times to be on the phone;
there are no early weekend calls, no late night calls and no dinner
hour calls. If there is a call coming in, he puts his friend on hold
answers the call and returns to his friend to let them know he will
call them back. Incoming calls have priority. When we need the phone
we get the phone.
I agree with the previous note that it can be viewed as a way to
socialize. Matt has a friend from summer camp that he keeps in touch
with. They have managed to play entire chess games over the phone.
Both have chess on a PC and they run their games simultaneously.
My opinion really boils down to it is part of the teenage culture,
lay down some basic ground rules and hope this is the worst you will
have to face for the next 4 - 6 years;-)
Tracy
|
719.8 | I could have written .0 | GAVEL::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Fri Apr 01 1994 10:19 | 21 |
| I agree with .3. Try to determine exactly what it is that bothers you. If
it's the sheer volume of time, call waiting or a second line won't help.
Our daughter will be 14 in about 2-1/2 months (I'm pretty precise, because we
are negotiating the scope of her birthday party. She started with 40, boys
and girls. We started with 6, girls only :^) ).
She gets her homework done and her grades are reasonable, so it's not just
the time. When we are bothered, it is because we are either expecting a
call, or need to make one.
We are fortunate. My wife runs a couple of small businesses, so we can
justify a second phone line. Also, Lara has to get up early to go to school,
so she is usually in bed by 9:00 or so.
The phone is very important to kids that age. They aren't "mobile" yet, but
they have an intense need to socialize. Keep that in mind; if you try to put
restrictions on, you may get a reaction that seems to you way out of
proportion to what you expect.
Clay
|
719.9 | | WMOIS::DIPASQUALE_S | | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:04 | 10 |
| I could have written note 1!! I refuse to get call waiting. I have set
a time limit. 15 min conversations, no more than 2 calls per hr. They
are not allowed to use the phone until after I come home from work, ( I
have a long commute, and I am a single parent).
No calls after 8:00 pm on school nights, no calls after 9:00 pm on
week nights. Thats the rules, they don't like, OH well. But it does seem
to work out. They still love me. :)
Sherry
|
719.10 | | ASABET::DOWNS | | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:10 | 6 |
| Thank you for all your relpies. I think I will talk to her about
putting in her own line that she will have to pay for. She babysits
every weekend so she can afford it and all her calls are local. I may
also go to Radio Shack and check that phone monitor out.
kim
|
719.11 | Anybody got change for a dollar... | NOTAPC::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:13 | 9 |
| Well, you could always put in a pay phone...
Its a joke! (Well, sort of...) :-) :-)
So... this is what I have to look forward to... I have 3 girls and a
boy, the oldest is 5... it should be fun in a few years... :-) :-)
- Tom
|
719.12 | | GAVEL::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:37 | 29 |
| I also meant to respond to some of the suggestions in .1. If you implement
any rules, remember that teenagers have a very acute sense of "fairness" and
"hypocricy" and they don't react well at all to rules that don't apply
equally to everybody.
> Charge her 25c per call longer than 5 mins.
Be prepared for her to put a stopwatch on YOU, especially if you're
"gabbing".
> Give her say 2 mins to get off the phone when you've told her you need
> it, and charge 25c per minute after 2 mins until she gets off.
Be prepared for her to put a stopwatch on YOU if she's expressed a need to
make a call that is important to HER, especially if you're "gabbing"/
> Charge her 25c for ever call that comes in for her that disrupts your
> mealtime.
This would seem fair to me only if your mealtimes are very regular, and only
after she's had time to warn her friends. And be prepared for her to
remember every phone call for YOU that disrupts your mealtime.
If your mealtimes are important to you, a suggestion that's somewhat parallel
to this one is that if the phone rings at during mealtime, REGARDLESS of who
the call is for, that it gets answered with "Sorry we're eating dinner, she/I
can't talk now. Can she/I call you back later?"
Clay
|
719.13 | Fairness includes "Who is paying for the phone?" | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Fri Apr 01 1994 12:30 | 29 |
| Hi Clay ...
Well, I have an 9 year old who was starting to be the phone junkie
and we told her that she had two choices ... either voluntarily be
more phone use courteous OR we'd do those things I mentioned.
She of course said that the charging rules were not fair ... so I
asked her simply who pays for the phone service ... "Dad does" ...
so who should get priority in using th ephone ... "Dad and Mum should"
If I pay for the phone is it fair for you to hog it ... "No" ... If
you do hog it, is it fair for me to charge you for it ? Thoughts ...
"Yes I guess so".
She voluntarily became more phone responsible. She asked her friends
to avoid calling around supper time etc Suppertime window being 5:30 -
7:00. It's not perfect still, but a lot better than it was. My wife
and I were going up the wall with continually answering the phone to
"Is Hilary there ?" Oh and the last thing ... We asked her to answer
the phone more often and more clearly (she used to whisper terribly
when answering the phone so the person on the other end could not
hear!)
While they do have a sense of fairness and hypocricy ... following the
fairness argument to its logical conclusion seems to work.. Ie
as long as I pay the phone bills, I get a bigger hand in saying how it
is used. But at the same time, I too am reasonable in honuring
requests to oget off the phone too!!! (Usually!)
Stuart
|
719.14 | make sure children also understnad expense of long distance and 900 numbers! | RUSAVD::HEALEY | M&ES, MRO4, 297-2426 | Fri Apr 01 1994 12:50 | 25 |
|
This doesn't apply to your situation exactly but is a lesson
that I learned from my parents that is important to
remember with teenagers and phones... make sure they
understand the expense of long distance calls!! When my
brother was a teenager, he met a girl who was vacationing
in our town for a week (Wolfeboro NH... resort town). She
was from Conn or NJ. Anyhow, she went back to her hometown
and for a month, my brother called her, after everybody
was in bed for the night and talked for 2-3 hours (10PM-midnight).
Well, the $900 phone bill (I'm not kidding here) came in and
my parents hit the roof! I don't quite know how they handled it but
I do know that the phone calls stopped. Thing is, I don't think
Jeff realized quite how much his nightly phone calls would come
out to be. He was as shocked as my parents when the phone bill
came in and was made to realize just how expensive long distance
calls were. He did know he was doing something wrong when he
was making them (or else he would make them during normal hours)
but faced with the reality of oweing my parents $900 (which he
probably never payed back completely), he wised up and ended his
long distance relationship!
This would also apply, of course, to children and 1-900 numbers.
Karen
|
719.15 | "Logical" ain't in my Dikshunary | GAVEL::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Fri Apr 01 1994 13:08 | 18 |
|
> Well, I have an 9 year old who was starting to be the phone junkie
> . . .
> While they do have a sense of fairness and hypocricy ... following the
> fairness argument to its logical conclusion seems to work.. Ie
> as long as I pay the phone bills, I get a bigger hand in saying how it
> is used.
No disagreement there. The problem is that "I pay, therefore I say" type
arguments -- which really amount to displays of power and authority -- don't
work as well with teenagers as they do with pre-teens. You get into
discussions like "fine, then I'll quit school so I can get a job, so I can
pay for my own phone line" type discussions.
And when dealing with teenagers you expunge "logical" from your vocabulary.
Clay
|
719.16 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Fri Apr 01 1994 13:49 | 15 |
| Clay,
This is a 9 year old teenager ... we commonly get "Fine --- I'll do xxx"
arguments.
The I pay, I say arguments aren't presented in exactly that manner ...
It goes more along the lines ... "Did you know that it costs over $20
every month for that phone for just local calls ? That's enough to
keep you fed all week." That approach usually seems to have more effect.
Otherwise, she'd just give up her allowance!
We find emotionally logical ways of presenting things like this ... because
pure logic does NOT work well ... you're perfectly right.
Stuart
|
719.17 | don't get between a teenager and a ringing phone | SOLVIT::HAECK | Debby Haeck | Mon Apr 04 1994 12:56 | 16 |
| When our oldest (now 19) started looking like she had a phone receiver
permanently attached to her ear, we tried quite a few things. The ones
I remember are:
- no calls after 10pm or before 9am
- calls during meals are asked to call back. period.
- if she was on the phone longer than 10 minutes and we needed it
then she was to hang up asap. Same applied if we were expecting
a call.
- no taking the phone into the bathroom!
- I always call home just before leaving for home to see if
anything is needed from the grocery store. So, she was not to tie
up the phone when that call was expected.
Actually, what we found even more aggravating was when she got her
license and was out of the house more often. We felt like an answering
service!
|
719.18 | PHONES!!! | POWDML::PIMENTEL | | Tue Apr 05 1994 15:35 | 27 |
| We had the phone problems too. This is how we resolved it.
- Call waiting
- Ring mate (we don't have to answer her phone or beeps when we are on
the phone. Her friends will call back if no answer as we have an
answering machine.)
- TWO hour limit per day on the phone (she was free to choose when
and how long she talked to any one friend and this has worked
wonderfully.
- No incoming calls past 9:30 no outgoing calls past 10 and off the
phone by 10:00
- The best thing is the respect we give each other on the phone now.
We set boundries -- "Mom, I'd like to use the phone at 7:30 to make a
call." or "Lisa, I'd like to use the phone in 10 minutes"
We now have a Foster Boy living with us who's the same age so now it
has to be divided three ways and it works. (Thank God my husband and
7 year old don't really use the phone!)
By the way the 2 hour limit is not even an issue now because we really
use the last bullet the most and what a peace of mind.
Good luck.
|
719.19 | ex | STUDIO::NDYER | | Tue Apr 05 1994 17:39 | 25 |
| Just a word of caution with their own phone lines. My daughter (now
19) wanted her own phone line when she was 15 or so and my condition
was that she have a part-time job for at least 3 months or full-time
(when she graduated, of course) for 6 mos before she got her own phone
line. Until that time we gave her ringmate, cause like someone else
mentioned, we were an answering service. This way we didn't have to
pay for a new line but just a few dollars a month for ringmate and
call waiting. REason for such a strict condition on own phone was
because if she quit her job guess who gets stuck with the bill? The
phone is in your house and she is underage so.....
We had an added problem in that both of my teenagers went to a regional
school so they had no local friends. My phone bill was over 100.00
per month. When my oldest moved out it dropped 50.00 / mo till the
next one started and on and on and on
Now I am happy to say my 19 year old has her own phone line and they
both share the bill and my bill is down again. Oh yes, one more thing
I did was get a block on the phone so that they could not dial 1,
no long distance calls. Block was 7.00 to have installed and nothing
to remove so I planned on doing it every summer or long semester
break but now they have their own phone.
Good luck
Nancy
|
719.20 | Also be careful of 900 numbers. | GAVEL::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Tue Apr 05 1994 17:52 | 7 |
| What is "ringmate"?
Also, I believe in most areas, you can block access to 1-900 numbers. That's
not an issue with us yet, but if it becomes an issue we'll do it in a
nanosecond.
Clay
|
719.21 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Tue Apr 05 1994 18:24 | 18 |
| I believe it has different names in different areas, but essentially,
you turn your phone into a single party party line ...
Thus you end up with 2 or more numbers ... each number has a diferent ring ...
normal <ring>pause<ring>pause etc
line 2 <ring><ring>pause<ring><ring>pause
line 3 <ring><tr><ring>pause<ring><tr><ring>pause
etc
where tr is a very truncated ring.
So this way you only pay for 1 line into the house, but a little extra for
the exchange lines. It is often not available on older exchanges where
per exchange line cost is high ... or in high number demand areas ... or
where the ringing generators cannot generate the various ring patterns.
Stuart
|
719.22 | 2nd line | SALEM::GILMAN | | Mon Apr 11 1994 15:11 | 20 |
| Seems to me .1 is essentially unenforcable. Do you want to spend all
your time keeping track of phone time, and then COLLECTING and
convincing her to pay you what she owes? This method seems to me to
be an excellent way to generate even more friction between you and your
daughter.
I suggest the 2nd phone line with HER paying for it. That way its
clean cut and HER responsibility. If she can't afford to pay for the
2nd line and falls behind on the bill too bad, she loses the line.
If it really came down to it you could have an UNLISTED # for your
number and list her number. That way you wouldn't be getting calls from
the boys who couldn't get through on her busy all the time line.
Yeah I guess I have suggested a hard line here.. but, after all your
dealing with a TEENAGER and that demands a hard line, right?
Smile
Jeff
|
719.23 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Mon Apr 11 1994 15:56 | 21 |
| > Seems to me .1 is essentially unenforcable. Do you want to spend all
> your time keeping track of phone time, and then COLLECTING and
> convincing her to pay you what she owes? This method seems to me to
> be an excellent way to generate even more friction between you and your
> daughter.
Jeff,
The idea is not really that it should be enforceable .... it is to draw to
the child's attention that a) phones cost money, and b) that others in the
household have a right to the phone too.
As I said, in our case with a 9 (going on 5, going on 14) year old, it had
the desired effect. After a couple charges, she now generally respects the
right of others to the phone and that we do not want to be disturbed at
supper or late in the evening. When her phone use became again unreasonable,
a few weeks ago, simply asking her if she wanted phone charges again, her
phone use returned to reasonable.
Stuart
|
719.24 | Incomingy | SALEM::GILMAN | | Mon Apr 11 1994 16:10 | 4 |
| Good point Stuart. How do you handle all those incoming calls from
friends?
Jeff
|
719.25 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Mon Apr 11 1994 18:25 | 16 |
| She has the opportunity to tell her friends that we do not appreciate
calls from approx 5-7 or after 9 ... if she gets a call in that time
from a friend who knows, and it isn't an emergency then .....
Cough Up!
She got a call from a friend over the Easter weekend at 10pm! She got
the call, and was overheard to say ... "you'd better not call me again
so late ... it'll get me in trouble!"
It's not quite like an inconsistently carried out threat ... and I put
it to her that way ... We'll put up with "abuse" occasionally, but if
it gets too bad then we'll warn her and then start charging ... There
is always the warning ...
Stuart
|
719.26 | FWIW | DV780::DORO | Donna Quixote | Mon Apr 11 1994 18:27 | 6 |
|
There is, I believe, a program where youcan pay only for the calls you
make..
Pay per call, sorta
Jamd
|
719.27 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Mon Apr 11 1994 18:54 | 5 |
| This is called individual measured service ... and is offered in areas
where there is essentially free local service. IMS is usually cheaper
only for incoming busness lines.
Stuart
|
719.28 | Baystate service/7 year old phone addict | LEDS::TRIPP | | Fri Apr 22 1994 15:16 | 54 |
| Thank heavens I don't yet have a teen, but at 7 AJ has "discovered" the
telephone. He arrived home within the first week of school with
several boys' AND girls' phone numbers, crayoned on paper scraps,
crayon cover pieces, etc.
First things first, he is 7 and he is only in the first grade. I guess
maybe I'm from a different planet, because I didn't think it started
that early. First rule I made was a little different, since it
appeared that he was exchanging phone numbers with most of the kids in
the class. I said I wanted him to ASK first if it was OK with the
child's parents to give out their phone number. ( I'm thinking in the
sense of many people have unlisted phones, they pay for the service for
a reason.) Then once he demostrated to me that he could dial the phone
and speak clearly and sensibly, I allowed him 2 calls per day, we set
the timer and he was allowed 5 minutes per call. He MUST ALWAYS ASK
first before even touching the phone (see the next paragraph) Period!
A couple weeks ago I had stepped outside of the house for no more than
10 minutes to do something. He was already in the proverbial doghouse
for having a week of horrible behavior, he met me at the door with TWO
scraps of paper, and announced proudly that he had called soandso and
soandso, this was almost 7p.m. at night taboot, kind of late by first
grade standards. Well I guess he had it coming, or maybe y'all are
going to think I'm the wicked witch, but I took the scraps of paper and
tore them up, and threw them in the wastebasket right then and there.
He was forbidden phone use for 2 weeks. I guess it really pushed a hot
button that I couldn't turn my back on him for 10 minutes, could've
been PMS but that's secondary.
For the older kids, the one cost saving thing I hae discovered is
something called "Bay State Service" on my phone. I have had the
service for ages, and is a real cost saver. You get basically 2 hours
of calling in the 617 and 508 areas for a fee, not much can't remember
exactly how much right now. (it used to be all of MA until a
couple years ago, I lost the ability to call 413). If you exceed the
two hours you do pay, but it ends up being about a third of the normal
toll call charges per minute (let's say .10/min as opposed to .30/min).
For me this is good, I still have family and friends who live quite a
distance, sometimes it is the only communications I may have in months.
It isn't good from 9am to noon weekdays only, that's regular toll
charges. I will frequently tell my sitters on the weekends that they
are free to call their friends, and toll calls are no object. So far
not one of them have abused it.
Second, I have a friend with two teen daughters. When I call their
home and a daughter is chatting on the phone with a friend they MUST
put me on hold (call waiting) and release the call with the friend so
the adults can talk. Admitedly sometimes I feel guilty cutting the
teen's call short, especially since I too have only called to chat.
But it's a no questions asked situation, they just do it!
Oh spare me, is this what I have to look forward to???? AUUGGHH!!!
Lyn
|
719.29 | | DELNI::DISMUKE | | Fri Apr 22 1994 16:06 | 9 |
| My kids are also early phone users (so far not abusers) - aged 7 and 9.
They both ask first (sometimes they want to call a friend at 7:00am on
a Saturday). And we have no lengthy phone calls. I'm just waiting for
the day when the feminine voices start calling. My first grader
collects phone numbers too. He likes to memorize them for future
reference.
-sandy
|