T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
713.1 | | STAR::GOLIKERI | | Thu Mar 24 1994 12:46 | 6 |
| Yep! Pretty fascinating. My Mom hardly ever used a thermometer when we
were growing up. She used to kiss us on the forehead to see if we have
a fever. I have used the same method on my kids (ages 5 and 2) to tell
if they have a temp. Even a temp of 99 can be detected.
Shaila
|
713.2 | True confessions | NIMBUS::HARRISON | Icecreamoholic | Thu Mar 24 1994 13:09 | 10 |
| Well, I must be a pretty rotten mother ;^), but I can assure you that
there was no way that I ever could have recognized my baby by touch.
Quite honestly, the first time I went into the hospital nursery to get
my little guy, I walked right past him! He looked like he had too much
hair, especially since most of the time previous to that (only a couple
of hours), he had been wearing the little headwarming cap. I immediately
realized the error of my ways, but it took a second.
Leslie
|
713.3 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | stepford specialist | Thu Mar 24 1994 13:57 | 8 |
| Leslie,
the key is touch, not visual. They have done studies where a mother is
allowed to see her infant, but 2 hours later can't recognize a picture
of the same baby. However if they touch and smell the baby, moms can
pick out their own babies t-shirt from a number of others.
Meg
|
713.4 | the nose knows! | XPOSE::POIRIER | | Thu Mar 24 1994 14:01 | 8 |
| I never tried, but I am sure if I had closed my eyes and let my nose
guide me, I would have been able to pick my children out. Even today, when
they are both using a the same color na-night (blanket), I know which one
belongs to Shannon, and which one is Courtney's. Shannon appears to know
hers by smelling it too! Funny thing is, their laudry is done
together.
|
713.5 | very interesting ... | NIMBUS::HARRISON | Icecreamoholic | Thu Mar 24 1994 14:04 | 12 |
| > the key is touch, not visual. They have done studies where a mother is
> allowed to see her infant, but 2 hours later can't recognize a picture
> of the same baby. However if they touch and smell the baby, moms can
> pick out their own babies t-shirt from a number of others.
Meg,
Thanks for clarifying that. I must admit that I'm still skeptical
that I would pass this "test," but find it fascinating.
Leslie
|
713.6 | it's twoo, it's twoo | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Thu Mar 24 1994 14:43 | 11 |
| The first or second night I was in the hospital, they were taking the
babies to the moms for nursing. I was *quite* sure I heard Alex,
though I was very skeptical about this oft-touted sensitivity/
recognition of the very-new baby's voice by the mom; minutes passed, and
I had concluded that I was the all-time lowlife Rotten Mom... when they
brought Alex in. I *had* heard her; they'd just parked her in the hall
and delivered everybody else's babies first!
My fever-lips are also right on target ;-*
Leslie
|
713.7 | | WEORG::DARROW | | Thu Mar 24 1994 17:32 | 13 |
|
I remember watching a special on Discovery channel, I believe.
A study was done in Israel comparing identification of newborns by
birth mothers compared with nurses who fed the babies. The nurses
were much more accurate with identifying babies based on sight.
The mothers failed the sight-id at something like 70% in the first
two days. However, the mothers' ability to recognize their babies
by scent was some astounding number ... I'm guessing 70% or so?
The mothers' ability to do a sight-id improved greatly within
3 or 4 days. The study speculated that it might be fatigue from
delivery, impared ability to concentrate, or something related to
hormones.
|
713.8 | recognise that cry | LINGO::MARSH | The dolphins have the answer | Fri Mar 25 1994 04:43 | 15 |
|
How about hearing?
Rebecca was put in a side nursery with the other section babies, while
the mothers were tended in the recovery ward. There were 5 of us in
this ward. At 5am, I heard a cry and asked the nurse to bring my
daughter to me so I could nurse her - sure enough, it was Rebecca who
wanted an early breakfast. She was almost 18 hours old at that point
and we'd only been apart for about 4 hours.
Of course it's a well know fact of zoology that seals recognise their
pups by their cries :-)
seals
|
713.9 | I knew her cry | ASIC::MYERS | | Fri Mar 25 1994 09:06 | 13 |
| I know that within hours I could identify Sarah's cry. Even though she
had the most distinctive cry I've ever heard, she squeaked in between
while catching her breath, I knew it was her before I even heard the
squeak.
I remember the first night I was sleeping in the hospital bed at the
opposite end from the nursery, all at once I woke up because I heard the
faint cry of a baby being wheeled down the hall (still far enough away
that the cry didn't have a distinct sound). I just knew that it was
Sarah. Sure enough as the baby got closer I could hear the squeak and
it was her.
Susan
|
713.10 | | GEEWIZ::BOURQUARD | Deb | Mon Mar 28 1994 10:47 | 8 |
| I could pass the sight test once she had her little hat off.
But I had an "unfair" advantage -- Noelle had a scab on her head from Mom's
unsuccessful but vigorous pushing.
- Deb
|
713.11 | Yep, knew her new cry too | CRONIC::BRADBURY | | Tue Apr 05 1994 15:10 | 15 |
| Yep, me too, they took Cassandra away for a shot and later I thought
I heard her loud cry and lenghty one at that, but I figured if it
really was her they'd bring her back or get me.
Sure enough after time passed I went to see, she was quiet then and I
thought I was imagining it, but the nurse said she was just going to
call me since she couldn't calm her down until just a minute ago...
guess they had to watch her for awhile for reaction to shot...
I had heard her, and now that I remember was automatically upset
hearing her loud protest, should have trusted my instincts and gone
down there!
Cynthia
|
713.12 | Knew her cry, too | ASIC::MYERS | | Tue Apr 05 1994 16:26 | 9 |
| Aside from the fact that Sarah had the most distinctive cry, she
squeaked when she breathed in, I knew even before hearing the squeak
that it was her.
The first night in the hospital I was sleeping and woke up suddenly. I
was sure that I could hear her crying, sure enough, I listened and as
she got closer I could hear "the squeak".
Susan
|
713.13 | I'm in sync, sleep wise | LEDS::TRIPP | | Tue Apr 19 1994 17:32 | 22 |
| I don't know too much about "way back then" but even now at the ripe
old age of 7, I am so much in sync with AJ that he and I are almost on
the same sleep schedule.
We had this past weekend of three days. All three days I would wake up
rather suddenly, all at different times, but would recognize that he
was just stumbling out of his room, or as I was just coming into full
awakening I would hear the "water" running as he took his first morning
bathroom time. Funny too is that the cats seem to stir and become
restless when they sense he is up.
I have had this way of waking up with him, even from infant times.
When he was much smaller, I would put him down for an afternoon nap,
and lay down as well. I would suddenly find myself awake, and aware
that he too was just begining to stir. This even happened in the
middle of the night when he was newborn.
Because of his needing NICU care from birth, I never had the priviledge
to hear his cry until he was almost a week old. (tubes in so many
places!)
Lyn
|
713.14 | Not just a Mom thing.. | AKOCOA::OUELLETTE | | Mon Aug 01 1994 17:07 | 8 |
|
This topic was interesting to me, cause even as a Dad, right away
I could pick out my kids from sight, sound and smell.. Honestly!
Bill
|