T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
537.1 | Head Start | POBOX::PALASEK_L | | Wed Jun 16 1993 10:16 | 24 |
| I skipped kindergarten and started 1st grade a month after turning 5.
I thought it was great. Being so young, you don't notice (from a
social stand point) the 1+ year age difference with most of your
friends at school. I did notice it in high school when everyone got
their driver's licenses before me and again in college when I wasn't
"legal" until 2 1/2 months AFTER graduation. But there were also
advantages...I felt as though I was getting a "head start" entering the
work force at 20 (that's what I thought at the time :) ), as a child I
felt special and tried to excel. Kids are very good at adapting to the
situation. When I'd look at the class below me and realize that is
where I should have been according to age, I was glad I was in the
higher grade. The class below seemed "younger". If your daughter has
already mastered most of the basics, she could be bored going into 1st
grade. I was in much the same situation as she. From looking at my
older brother's books I taught myself alot of things. I can't imagine
if they sent me to kindergarten when I was already doing a 3rd grade
mathbook at home. I don't think I would have reacted very well to
naptime! I assume you are in Mass/NH. Do they have testing available
to determine if it is okay for her to skip? I grew up in Michigan and
there we had to go through a testing process in the school system
before starting. I think jumping from 8th to 10th grade (or something
similar) might be hard because you have already established friends,
etc. But, since your daughter is just starting I bet she will do just
fine!
|
537.2 | me too. | POWDML::DUNN | | Wed Jun 16 1993 10:22 | 18 |
| I started kindergarten "on time". When I was in first grade, I was
reading so well that I used to go down to second grade to read. So at
the end of the year, they just bumped me directly to third grade.
I have never suffered for this, and if I were the parent in this
situation would push for it.
Socially, being a year younger was never even really known until it
came to driving and being "legal" in high school, but I went places
with friends who drove, and these days since "age" is 21, everyone is
in the same boat in high school so that's moot.
Academically it worked out fine. math was always my stronger subject,
so I caught up in that to the 3rd grade level just fine, and then just
went from there.
I can not point to one negative thing that came from the experience.
|
537.3 | Skipping grades | POWDML::WALKER | | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:21 | 32 |
|
I actually skipped two grades, one at the start of school as well as my
junior year of high school. Being born in the fall meant that I started
my senior year at age 15. Aside from the age spread and graduating
without my initial classmates there were no significant issues. I
entered the work force and continued my education at the same time.
Sixteen years later I am still in school, a chronic student.
As for your daughter, you may find that the public school systems are
reluctant to let a child skip a grade. My son was born 2.5 hours after
the deadline for him to start in a public school system in Mass.
The school would not even consider letting him start until the
"official" time even though he was more than prepared. I believe
private schools have a tendency to be less rigid in these rules. Once
in the system his "testing" placed him far beyond his grade level. By
the start of third grade he was reading at a post-high school level,
sciences at high school, and his math at grade level. Fortunately
the school had a program for "bright" students and he was able to
particiapte in other activities in an after school program. Unfortunately
with the budget contraints on most public school systems, this type
of program is becoming rare. Last summer we moved to a town without
such a program. The curriculum is structured to offer various levels
of math and reading to meet the needs of the individual child.
I would suggest speaking to the school about your daughter and the
options for her next year. If advanced placement is not an option,
perhaps you can work with the teacher to assure you daughter is
challenged and doesn't find herself bored with her school work.
This you may find is the biggest challenge.
|
537.4 | Thanks | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:37 | 22 |
| Thanks for the feedback.
I probably should have mentioned in the basenote that our older
daughter, 8, is considerably ahead of her class academically, but is
socially right where she belongs. We had really good luck with her
kindergarten and first grade teachers, who made special efforts to keep
her challenged. Her second grade teacher just doesn't seem to get it.
She marvels at our daughter's vocabulary and math skills, but marvel is
about all she does. You would think that a kid constantly getting 100
on all the tests and then looking bored would provide a clue, but
apparently not.
It is this second grade experience that has made feel quite strongly
that our younger daughter should be presented with a challenge right
from the start. She's certainly up to it. She also has a personality
type that lends itself to what some might consider "troublemaking" when
she's bored. Anything to make life more interesting, I guess. Makes
sense to me.
Thanks again for the responses.
John H-C
|
537.5 | A different view | BRAT::JANEB | See it happen => Make it happen | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:46 | 23 |
| My daughter missed the "cutoff" date for first grade by 3 days, so she
went to first grade at age 6 and turned 7 on October 3. She was
reading 5th grade books and "got" multiplication when she started
school last fall.
First grade was the perfect place for her this year. Socially, she's a
first grader. Fortunately, the teacher did a great job of challenging
her intellectually (providing appropriate books, not giving extra
"papers"), and the math program "Math Their Way" is adaptable to each
kid's level.
My sister and niece, both young for their grades, both had substantial
troubles on the social side - kids were developing a year ahead of them
and they weren't into the same things. My sister (now a Kindergarten
teacher) regrets being the youngest and wishes she'd been in the next
grade. My niece is always left out - now it's boys and puberty that
she's not into and the other girls are. Both were very intelligent and
did/do great on the academics.
I would urge you to look at the children your daughter plays with and
plays like - is she more comfortable with the kids that are going into
first grade or the kids going into second grade? This will give you
another clue as to where she belongs.
|
537.6 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | Education Reform starts at home.... | Wed Jun 16 1993 17:30 | 34 |
|
There are as many different viewpoints on this issue as you want to find.
The items you, as a parent, need to consider are:
1. What is your daughter's social situation?
A child who is ahead academically is not necessarily able to
deal with the level of social skills she might need at the
higher grade level.
2. Many children who read or do math at higher levels than their
peers do so simply because they have had better home care in
these areas. Most are academically with their age group by
the 3rd grade. Some are clearly able to do advanced work in some
subject matter but not in others. Also there is nothing to prevent
parents from working with teachers to provide more challenging
work for students outside the classroom. The excuse you'll get
about inside the classroom is likely to be around the number of
kids vs individual lessons.
3. You know your child best. This is both good and bad. You need to
determine if this is for your ego or the best interest of your child.
Most of us make all of our decisions in the best interest of our
children but it is something we all need to examine periodically.
4. Kindergarteners still have very strong ties to parents. The leap
to a higher grade can sometimes be difficult in terms of parental
seperation. In other cases it's no big deal but it is a
consideration.
5. If you are leaning toward attempting the skip then you also need to
objectively discover how your child really feels about it.
|
537.7 | | XLIB::CHANG | Wendy Chang, ISV Support | Thu Jun 17 1993 11:33 | 24 |
| This is an issue that hunts us ever since our son was born. However,
I have come to a conclusion that social readiness is much more
important than the academical achievement.
A lot of academical ability will come naturally with the age and
maturity. Like Mike said in .6, most kids will catch up at grade
3.
I came from a country that focuses on academical achievement since
a child was born. Almost all the kids can read and do math before
entering kindergarten. Multiplication and Division were introduced
at grade 1. Here in the U.S., if a 7 year old knows multiplication
is considered advanced but at where I came from, this is norm.
Why? It is not because the kids in the U.S. are less bright, it
is because they are not taught as much. But all these kids (U.S. and
non-U.S.) will be equal when they graduate the college. The U.S.
kid will probably do much better socially and turn out to be a much
more well-rounded person.
I just want to emphasize the importance of social situation. Your
daughter is still very young. She and you will have to work hard for
the next 15 years to maintain her academic status.
Wendy
|
537.8 | Is it fair to skip, if grammie is pushing? | SALES::LTRIPP | | Fri Jul 23 1993 14:54 | 37 |
| I've got sort of a different twist on this situation, and would
appreciate some feedback.
My neice age 8 next week, and her brother who will be 6 on Sept 3 are
staying with my inlaws (their grandparents) until the end of the next
school year. Because my nephew's birthday is Sept 3, he missed
entering public kindegarten last September by three days. My brother
inlaw enrolled him into a private kindegarten and he really did well.
This boy is actually picking up children's books and really reading.
It has helped him to become mature, and control his temper. Which was
a real problem when he visited last summer.
My inlaws are really pushing in a big way to have him enter first grade
in september, but technical due to his birth date he should be entering
kindegarten. Maybe he is mature, but so is AJ. We enrolled AJ into
kindegarten last year, because he too missed the town cutoff by two
days. (cutoff date Jan 1, AJ's birthday Jan 2).
Part of what I think I'm seeing is that there is AJ, and his other
cousin who are only weeks apart in age they were 6 last January and
March respectively, and will be entering first
grade this fall, then there's Jason who won't be 6 until September but
my inlaws haven't come right out to say it, but it's almost like they
feel they have to keep him up with his cousins who are several months
older. Then there's something that knaws at me like nails on a
chalkboard. AJ had to wait an entire year for school because of
missing the cutoff date by a couple days, why shouldn't Jason wait?
AJ tested as above average intelligence, but still needed a classroom
aid due to a short term memory problem, and extra but NOT hyper
activity. He will enter first grade this year without a classroom aid,
and for that matter he really didn't need the aid at all the last half
of the year, maybe longer.
I guess I need some Objective feed back from you folks on what I am
feeling in this situation. I can always count on honest opinions here.
Lyn
|
537.9 | from experience | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Fri Jul 23 1993 15:10 | 21 |
| This issue is dear to me. When I started school in India (1965) there
were no strict rules on the age of kids entering 1st grade. I started
preschool at 2 and 1st grade at 5. I was always 2 years younger than
the average age of the class. I did very well at school but the demands
on my with respect to doing well or simply keeping up with the kids in
my class were great. I was mature, scored high, etc. All's well so far
but ALL I REMEMBER DOING IN MY CHILDHOOD IS GO TO SCHOOL AND STUDY AT
HOME the rest of the time. I did NOT ENJOY LIFE! I did not have time to
play with kids my own age. I did play but not as much as other kids. I
did not realize that when I was young but now looking back at my
childhood I wasted those years just studying.
I am proud that I graduated with a B.S. at age 19 and completed my 1st
M.S. program at age 21. THEN I started enjoying life. I should have
been doing that long before.
So, the skiiny of it is that I would not want to push a child to skip a
grade or similar. The earlier years may be a breeze but the later
years do demand hard work.
Shaila
|
537.10 | | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Fri Jul 23 1993 15:12 | 2 |
| ....to add if the issue is that a child missed a grade by 3 days then
it is different. NEVER MIND!
|
537.11 | | DV780::DORO | | Fri Jul 23 1993 15:14 | 10 |
|
since you asked ... it *does* sound like you've got some personal
issues with this.
I'm not up to this age yet, but I think there are objective tests that
indicate a child's readiness for school. If you can get agreement to
use this test, and go with whatever outcome is recommended, it could
work for all concerned.
JAmd
|
537.12 | fair to whom? | BROKE::NIKIN::BOURQUARD | Deb | Fri Jul 23 1993 15:47 | 22 |
| I find the question in your title to be interesting: "Is it fair to skip,
if grammie is pushing?"
First, I'll consider the "if grammie is pushing" part to be irrelevant.
That is, the decision for Jason to skip or not to skip should not be
based upon how pushy or unpushy grammie is.
But are you asking:
"Would it be fair to Jason for him to skip public kindergarten? "
or are you asking:
"Would it be fair to AJ for Jason to skip public kindergarten?"
Your note sounds like you feel there's some injustice being done to AJ
if Jason skips public kindergarten. And here I'm stuck. The decision
for when AJ starts public school and at which grade level is/should be
completely separate from the decision for when Jason starts public school
and at which grade level.
- Deb
|
537.13 | Cut-offs are for a reason. | POWDML::WALKER | | Fri Jul 23 1993 16:57 | 29 |
| As I mentioned in my earlier reply my son missed by 2.5 hours, he was
born at 2:30 AM and the cut-off was 12:00 AM. If your nephew is going
into public school it is irrelevant who is doing the pushing, the
cut-off is exactly that.
Private schools have a different interpretation of the cut-offs and
will allow a child to enter earlier than a public school in the same
district.
Regardless of what happens with your nephew, have confidence your son
is in an environment with an age appropriate peer group. My son is
now going into Jr. High and his peer group varies in age from those
children who were held back in pre-first to those with birthday's close
to his.
I do know the most compelling arguement the school made was that boys
tend to be less mature than the girls. Therefore, a "young" boy in a
class of "older" girls can be viewed as a disipline problem simply
for exhibiting age appropriate behavior. In other words, your child
will be judged against the other students. A "young" boy can have
the academic ability for advanced placement but lack the equally
important social skills of his peers.
Tracy
|
537.14 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | Education Reform starts at home.... | Mon Jul 26 1993 11:46 | 14 |
| Lynn,
I've expressed my opinions about the arbitrary nature of cutoffs before.
Some kids are ready and some aren't. At this age social factors should take the
larger role in this type of decision. Academics will come over the next couple of
years anyway. I would, personally, choose to err on the younger side rather than
the older.
There may be a change in cutoffs coming but I doubt it will affect the
1993/94 school year. The Education Reform Act puts the decisions for things like
age cutoff, length of day, length of year, etc. in the hands of the state board
of education (to set minimums). I expect the issue of age cutoff to be addressed
pretty quickly as it got much discussion in hearings in the legislature.
Mike
|
537.15 | my experience | ASABET::HABER | supercalifragilisticexpialidocious | Tue Jul 27 1993 22:05 | 28 |
| My daughter missed the cut-off in our town (Boxborough, MA) by 3 weeks.
I had her on the list for school choice in Acton, where the cut off is
Dec. 31; she would have been 4.9 when she started -- i.e. one of the
youngest. I too was getting pressure from my mother and sister to start
her last year, but I decided that I'd rather have her be one of the
oldest in her own school rather than the youngest in a strange school,
one where she'd only be for the one year. It was tempting,
financially, because day care is so expensive. But I watched my
nephew, whose birthday is also end of October, struggle in kindergarten
and even into first grade, because he just wasn't ready, but he was
sent because all of his pre-school friends were going, etc. Now, in 2nd
grade, he's doing just fine, but it took him till the end of his 1st
grade year to learn to read.
I'm so glad I waited -- Shaina needed the year to grow emotionally.
I'd made the prediction that she'd blossom in January, and she didn't
prove me wrong! She's now reading a little and is a lot more
comfortable with herself and others.
I admit, missing the cut by 3 weeks isn't exactly the same as missing
it by 3 days or even 2 hours (can't believe that!) But I feel that
sometimes it's better to be the oldest instead of the youngest (and I
started school at 4.5 and still, to this day, sometimes wish that my mother
had waited another year). And don't worry about fair or unfair -- just
be sure that YOU are comfortable with your decision -- the kids won't
mind.
Sandy
|