T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
463.1 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | Education Reform starts at home.... | Mon Feb 22 1993 15:34 | 18 |
| In Massachusetts you should be able to get absenteeism figures from the
schools financial report. A copy of the report is on file with the town
accountant/treasurer as well as at the state level and is a public document.
The document will not give you figures on why the absenteeisms occurred.
Sometimes this is done for reasons of privacy to individuals (you would
be surprized at the number of attempted suicides the average high school
deals with). Other times it's a matter of not having accurate reasons.
There are state reporting laws for certain communicable diseases (IE measles)
that require a Board of Health certificate before return to school is
allowed and the BoH does keep track of these.
School employees are also mandatory reporters under child abuse/neglect laws
in the state of Massachusetts. Thus an incident like the one reported in the
previous note would immediately have DSS and other state/local service and
law enforement agencies involved.
|
463.2 | don't some things have to be reported? | SALES::LTRIPP | | Mon Feb 22 1993 15:51 | 22 |
| Melissa, please clarify: in certain circumstances doesn't the school
have to notify the parents if a communicable disease if found in the
school, so that parents can have appropriate immunization boosters
given? I'm thinking particularly of sending the staff and students for
Shots following the outbreak of Hepatitis, or a sudden large outbreak
of other things like Chicken Pox, measles etc, or even head lice?
I do remember reading in the paper just before Christmas that a school
had closed because over 1/3 of the students and staff were home with a
flu. So the school was closed for several days. I think in that case
it was simply a case of too few students, and definitely not enough
teachers.
Last year in preschool a note was sent home telling the parents of a
violent stomach flu that was hitting the kids very suddenly. It
basically warned that if it couldn't be brought under control within
the next 24 hours that the preschool would be closed for (I think)
three days to allow for disinfecting all areas, toys and eating
and cooking utensils, and to allow for the flu to take it's course and
not spread further. In this case no specific age group was pinpointed.
Lyn
|
463.3 | I don't believe they have to report anything | DEWEYD::CHADSEY | | Tue Feb 23 1993 07:33 | 13 |
| I don't believe the school has to notify the parents in terms of
communicable disease. My oldest picked up whooping cough at our local
junior high a couple of years back. When Sara caught this there were
already two other children diagnosed with it...... The schools and all
the area doctors had been notified by the state dept of board of
health. Unfortunately no one bothered to tell the parents.. Since I
had no idea what Sara had I brought my premature baby home and she
promptly caught whooping cough.
Bottom line, I guess I won't assume that the school system would
communicate information on communicable disease.
susan
|
463.4 | | CSC32::DUBOIS | Discrimination encourages violence | Tue Feb 23 1993 13:36 | 13 |
| At our daycare/preschool, they fill out an accident report for a child who
has been hurt, which tells how the child got hurt and what they did about it.
The parents are supposed to sign it, as well as the teacher and the director
of the school, and there is a copy for the school and for the parents.
When the kids get strep or chicken pox or something like that, they post
it on the front door in large letters so everyone sees it. They tell
how many cases they have had so far, and in the case of a recent, less
common illness, they also posted the symptoms of the disease and at what
point the child could return to school ("when the rash is gone", type of
thing).
Carol
|
463.5 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | Education Reform starts at home.... | Tue Feb 23 1993 14:05 | 41 |
| RE: .2
1. It's Mike not Melissa (my fault for not signing my name!)
2. Mass. General Laws Chapter 71 sections 53-57 cover medical
personnel and medical reporting requirements. There are no regulations
or laws governing the notification of parents other than the parents of
sick children. However, there are strict guidelines under the
jurisdiction of the Board of Health, regarding what diseases are
considered communicable and when a child should or shouldn't be in
school. The school is required to send a child home immediately if
one of these diseases is found to have infected that child. The child
cannot return to school without a certificate from the board of health
or examination by the school physician.
3. There are laws regarding the rights of students and parents to privacy
in the matter of medical issues. For example it is illegal in the state
of Massachusetts for a school or school employee to reveal information
that could lead to the identification of HIV/AIDS infected students.
4. It would appear to be a matter of policy and therefor a matter to
bring before the school committee as regards the notification of the
community when the potential for communication of certain disease
exists. Some communicable diseases are, by law, screened for within
the school (IE tuberculosis). Some are simply seasonal and should at
least deserve mention in normal newsletters sent home during that season
(IE the flu, lice, etc). Unfortunately, when schools do notify parents
of the potential for illness it is more often true that many parents
overreact than use common sense and the lack of notification is often
to avoid dealing with panicking, overprotective parents.
5. regarding accidents and "coverups". The questin of liability is a
mute issue as regards teachers and administrators in Massachusetts.
Any school employee who renders aid to a student who is injured or
sick (or potentially so) in good faith is not laible for any damages
that may be caused by such actions. However, case law does provide
instances where, if negligence has been proven on the part of the school,
liability has been enforced.
Mike
|
463.6 | they really don't need to know | SALES::LTRIPP | | Wed Feb 24 1993 09:23 | 19 |
| This may be a bit nit picky, but if the law says the school doesn't
have to know if the child has something like HIV, then why does the
school have the right to refuse to admit my child if I don't provide
them with a medical history form. I understand the part that they need
to know if the immunizations are up to date, but I feel they don't need
to know what the child's medical history consists of.
In my case I provided the immunization information, and on the section
where is asks for medical history it simply says "contact physician".
So far so good. But then again since AJ has had such EXTENSIVE medical
history I'd have to give them a small BOOK with his medical history.
I have only told them what I feel they need to know, such as he has asthma
that may act up from time to time, and affect his classroom behavior,
as well as he may have an occational toileting accident, which is at
times beyond his control, and that he can handle these himself without
assistance.
Lyn
|
463.7 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | Education Reform starts at home.... | Wed Feb 24 1993 14:31 | 47 |
| Lyn,
I'll quote the law. Mass. Genrl Laws Chapter 71 section 57:
The [school] committee, or board of health ....shall cause every child
in the public schools....to be seperately and carefully examined in such manner
and at such intervals, including original entry, as may be determined by the
department of public health after consultation with the department of education
and the medical profession, to ascertain defects in sight or hearing, postural
and other physical defects tending to prevent his receiving the full benefit of
his school work, or requiring a modification of the same in order to prevent
injury to the child or to secure the best educational results, and to ascertain
defects of the feet which might unfavorably influence the child's health......
and shall require a physical record of each child be kept in such forms as
prescribed by the provisions of section 185A of chapter 111. .......
end of law.
Also, the law says that the schools may not require that HIV/AIDS patients
inform them but policies are usually developed that urge parents to inform
school personnel. Since only certain behaviors put others at risk of exposure
those behaviors may result in students being excused from school (IE policies
are being developed to prevent students who bleed profusely or have open
wounds or sores that cannot be controlled by medication or successfully
covered from attending school as well as students who exhibit behavioral
patterns involving biting.).
The privacy laws protecting the rights of individuals are Mass. Gnrl Laws
chapter 214 section 1B (Massachusetts Privacy Act) and Chapter 111 section 70F
(prohibition of disclosure of information regarding HIV). Also federal case
law (DOE vs University of Cincinnati 1988) upholds that the right not to be
identified as HIV positive falls under the constitutional right to privacy.
Additional protections are afforded to inidividuals under the Americans
with Disibilities Act which defines HIV/AIDS as a disability.
I saw nothing in any law regarding the requirement of full medical history and
thus would expect you wouldn't here anything back from the school for answering
in the manner in which you did. I would also suspect that the school is asking
for this information as a matter of course in order to fulfill its obligation
to your child as its charge during the school day and to better help a school
nurse (or in some cases even a teacher) better deal with any situation that
may arise. That would certainly be open to discussion between the school and
the parent.
|