T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
415.1 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | Jesus, the Gift that keeps on giving! | Thu Dec 31 1992 13:04 | 18 |
|
Thanks Lisa!
I didn't even *think* that it would be reimbursed. We paid
ours out of pocket! I'll have to see if I can put in a claim
(I use Tufts, too)
Another thing I noticed during open enrollment is that
obstetric visits are covered 100%. After I'd been to
my OB about 6 times, one of the receptionists asked me
for $18 in co-payments. I paid that, plus I made a copayment
for several more of my visits. I doubt that I'll try to get it
back, but I'll know better next time around. I assumed that since
they asked for the money, I was supposed to pay it. I'll be sure
to call Tufts to confirm in the future (Especially with co-payments
up to $5.00 now!)
Karen
|
415.2 | | LTLDPR::ANDERSON | | Tue Jan 05 1993 09:49 | 2 |
| Hmmm. I'm curious...I have Tufts also and I read that there is a co-payment
for OB visits. Am I missing something?
|
415.3 | Tufts | WHEEL::POMEROY | | Tue Jan 05 1993 11:35 | 11 |
| We use Tufts also. In looking at the Benefits booklet, just handed
out during open enrollment, it does state a co-payment for OB visits.
I'm wondering if we only have to pay one co-payment for the entire
pregnancy.
I will call Tufts and find out...
Will let you know.
Peggy
|
415.4 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Tue Jan 05 1993 11:50 | 6 |
|
That's how it works for MTHP/Hitchcock, you pay 5$ at the first
prenatal visit and all of the rest are covered under that co-payment.
Makes having babies a rather inexpensive venture (yeah right ;-))
Wendy
|
415.5 | Tufts answer | WHEEL::POMEROY | | Tue Jan 05 1993 11:50 | 15 |
| Ok, I just spoke to Tufts and here's the scoop.
For each OB visit, there is a co-payment of $5.
Childbirth classes ARE reimburseable. You have to send in a
certificate from the Lamaze class and they will reimburse you.
It HAS to be Lamase based classes.
The hospital charges are covered 100%, basic stay is two days AFTER
the birth and semi-private rooms only are covered.
Hope this helps!
Peggy
|
415.6 | Healthsource NH | VMSSG::KILLORAN | | Tue Jan 05 1993 13:10 | 12 |
|
I have Healthsource New Hampshire. I went to my Primary
Care Physician for the pregnancy test and paid the $5.00
copay. When I went to the OB they told me as long as I
am pregnant I don't have to pay them. The OB then referred
me to an Endocrinologist because I have a history of
Gestational Diabetes and I do not have to pay this doctor
either.
Jeanne
|
415.7 | More on Tufts | MARX::FLEURY | | Tue Jan 05 1993 15:05 | 3 |
| I have TUFTS. My OB asked for a single co-pay of $30 to cover all the
visits for the entire pregnancy. I'm not sure if that is a TUFTS policy, or
if that just the policy for this particular office.
|
415.8 | tufts | ASABET::TRUMPOLT | Liz Trumpolt - 223-7195, MSO2-2/F3 | Tue Jan 05 1993 16:05 | 6 |
| I didn't know that Tufts would reimburse you for Lamaze classes. Do
you think they would honor a Lamaze certificate from 3 years ago. If
so I am going to make them out a copy of mine and send it in to them.
Liz
|
415.9 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | Jesus, the Gift that keeps on giving! | Tue Jan 05 1993 16:30 | 6 |
|
I never got a certificate. Wouldn't a bill showing the fee
as paid suffice ?
Karen
|
415.10 | Fallon Plan | POWDML::GERRITS | | Tue Jan 05 1993 16:35 | 19 |
| Are there any Fallon members out there? I know that co-pay is $2 per
visit except for ANY hospital services which are covered 100%. The
only additional cost to have a baby is if you request a private vs.
semi-private room. I found out yesterday that it will only cost me $5
extra a day for a private room (I'll be at Leominster Hospital). $5 to
have a baby! GREAT! Can't beat it!
I do have a question about the childbirth classes though. I know that
Fallon will reimburse for half (up to $25 I believe), but is anyone
familiar with the logistics of the reimbursement? I've sent my card
into Leominster Hospital requesting to be signed up for classes
(haven't heard anything yet), without sending payment. Do they bill me
and then I show that to Fallon and they then reimburse me? I guess the
same question would apply for Fallon's carseat program. Anybody?
Thanks in advance!
Lynn
|
415.11 | FALLON INFO | KAHALA::ROWE | | Wed Jan 06 1993 08:28 | 31 |
| Lynn,
I'm a Fallon member. Just last week I received a confirmation letter from
them indicating our schedule for childbirth classes. Along with the letter
was a form that they asked us to fill out, and return with payment...at
least two weeks prior to the first class. They ask for payment in full
before the first class.
The Leominster Hospital fee for the classes is $50, but if you belong to
Fallon, they only require you to send in a check for $25...they will bill
Fallon for the other $25. You'll need to put your Fallon MR# and ID# on
the form you return with your check. So you won't have to worry about
getting "reimbursed" from Fallon.
As for Fallon's carseat program (we're scheduled to go tomorrow night!),
I think we sent in a check for $20 when we signed up for the class. At
the time, we didn't know when the class would be scheduled. Later on,
we received a confirmation notice indicating that our payment was received,
and the date we were scheduled to attend the class at the Fallon facility.
When you attend the class, they will give you the carseat.
I hope this helps!
Jayne
P.S. - thanks for the info about private vs. semi-private room charges.
Since I haven't "toured" the hospital yet, I haven't seen what room
choices are available. I think one of the childbirth classes includes
a tour of the maternity facilities.
|
415.12 | Thank you... | POWDML::GERRITS | | Wed Jan 06 1993 08:48 | 3 |
| Thanks for the info Jayne! I'm looking forward to starting classes!
Lynn
|
415.13 | Fallon & Leom. Hospital rooms | LJOHUB::WESSELS | Macintosh lust | Wed Jan 06 1993 12:05 | 8 |
| Jayne's right on both counts. However, I seem to remember that
the additional charge for the private room was $10/day. I could be wrong
though. It may become academic; when my wife had a baby, there were no
private rooms available. We ended up with a semi-private, but they left
the second bed unoccupied (no extra charge). The only drawback: no recliner
for "Dad." :-(
Brian W.
|
415.14 | Private and semi-private | ALLVAX::CLENDENIN | | Wed Jan 06 1993 16:17 | 7 |
|
The difference between private and semi-private is $10.00 I called the
hospital today. Semi-private is $320.00 and private is $330.00
Lisa
|
415.15 | More on Leominster hospital/Fallon | POWDML::GERRITS | | Thu Jan 07 1993 08:44 | 15 |
| Lisa,
That's odd about the difference in room costs. The reason I say that
is because I had met with a person from Fallon's patient relations on
Monday, and she called Leominster for me as I sat there. The person on
the other end told her a $5 difference. Oh well. Like someone else
said, it's academic I guess. $5 or $10, it's definitely well worth it!
Would anyone who's had a baby at Leominster want to comment on the
staff, the dinner they give you before you leave, etc.? I love the
ward! Getting off the elevator onto that floor is like walking into a
hotel lobby!
Lynn
|
415.16 | I loved Leominster Hospital | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Thu Jan 07 1993 12:21 | 29 |
|
Lynn,
I LOVED the maternity ward at Leominster hospital!!!! You should be
very happy there. The staff was great, very friendly and attentive.
I had a labor nurse (with a british accent) who was fabulous!
As you saw, the ward is BEAUTIFUL. Plenty of room, everything is new
and the lobby area is large for waiting family and friends (my whole
family was there waiting, and my younger sisters had already picked out
which couchs they planned on sleeping on if I went thru the night!!)
I liked the way the nursery was set up also, that anyone coming off the
elevator didn't have to go searching to find the babies to look at,
they were right there..
The dinner was very nice, served down in the dining room (bring your
doughnut tho, the chairs are wooden! OUCH!I sent hubby up for mine).
I forget the choice of meals, but we had a nice piece of steak, carafe
of wine and dessert (cheesecake!), with linens, candles and all!
Along with that, they had a McDonalds run everynight at 7pm (if they
still do this, I don't know)...they gave you a list of the menu and you
got to get whatever you wanted...the tab picked up by the hospital!!!
I was VERY VERY happy with everything about the hospital and the ward.
I hope you are too!
Chris (who delivered there 14 mos ago)
|
415.17 | Rooming-in question. | WHEEL::POMEROY | | Thu Jan 07 1993 14:25 | 14 |
| I've been considering rooming-in this time. Notice, I said
"considering".
I'm wondering how this is done. Tufts will cover a semi-private
room. Do they allow rooming-in in a semi-private room? or do
they give you a private room at no extra charge because you're not
using the nursery.
Just curious...
Thanks,
peggy
P.S. I'll be using Emerson Hospital in Concord.
|
415.18 | Call Emerson and ask the price difference | ALLVAX::CLENDENIN | | Thu Jan 07 1993 15:07 | 12 |
|
Peggy,
From what I have heard you have to have a private room to room in.
I'm also "considering" rooming in. You should call Emerson and ask
the price difference between priv vs semi, since it's most times 5 or
10 dollars and pay the difference yourself, thats what I plan to do. I
just hope they have a private available so I can do this.
Good luck Lisa
|
415.19 | | CSIDE::DUPLAK | | Thu Jan 07 1993 16:06 | 21 |
|
Lisa & Peggy,
By "rooming-in" do you mean baby stays with Mom in room?
If so, is it hospital policy (Emerson in particular) that
does not allow rooming-in for semi-private?
I had my first at Emerson and requested and got a private
room (it was extra under John Hancock). Emerson gives
privates on a first-come, first-served basis.
I roomed-in with my baby but I think it was all by chance.
No one asked and I was not aware I needed to request it.
I was nursing and just kept her with me. This worked out
fine for me.
I'm due with my second at the end of May and will be going
to Emerson, again. I'm interested in this policy
especially from the standpoint that, if there are no privates
available and one wants to room-in, what can she do?
Deanna
|
415.20 | I loved rooming-in with my Sweet-tart! | SWAM1::HERRERA_LI | | Thu Jan 07 1993 19:53 | 16 |
| Hi,
As for "rooming-in": I highly recommend it!! When I had my son Alex
I was so incredibly captivated by the little person that I couldn't
have imagined letting him out of my sight. The nurses offered to take
him away, but I was emphatic about him staying with me (my husband
stayed with us, also). I, too, was nursing and I wanted to make sure
that he wasn't given any sugar-water or pacifier.
Remember, "mother knows best". My $.02 says follow your heart....
Those memories of our first days together are precious to me!!!!!
Good luck and wishing you all safe deliveries,
Linette
|
415.21 | | STROKR::dehahn | ninety eight don't be late | Fri Jan 08 1993 08:35 | 9 |
|
On the other hand...we chose not to room in. Birth is a very tiring experience
for both mother and husband. My wife needed a lot of rest to recover from the
cesarian. By not rooming in, we could have the baby in the room as much as we
wanted...plenty of time to experience everything...and if we wanted to rest the
nurse just wheeled him down the hall. The only time they took him out of the
room were for baths and cotor checkups, and I was present for both.
Chris
|
415.22 | need private room for older siblings to visit | KANGA2::ranger::s_dimario | Susan DiMario | Mon Jan 11 1993 06:35 | 14 |
|
There is another consideration that I came across in choosing a semi-private
vs. private room at Emerson hospital for my hospital stay after having my
second child.
If you want an older sibling to be able to visit at other than regular
visiting hours, you have to have a private room. This was essential for
us since we wanted older brother to be able to come visit mom and meet
his new little brother. Regular visiting hours at Emerson are 2-3 (in the
middle of nap time for most toddlers) and 6-8 (dinner, bedtime). If I hadn't
had a private room, Ben (my older son) wouldn't have been able to come and
some very special time would have been missed.
|
415.23 | Love Leominster! | FDCV06::WILSON | Charlene | Mon Jan 11 1993 11:53 | 14 |
| I just delivered at Leominster 5 months ago and yes they still have
McDonald's runs (thank god) and all. I had a private room and I have
real problems sleeping after I deliver children so I had my son in with
me all but at night and Pedi check-ups.
As far as the OB co-payment, I have central mass health care and the
whole total bill with both for me to deliver and my kids to stay in
the nursery, room, etc...was 3,000. I payed out a 3$ check for the
global co-payment. (this is what they called it when I asked if they
need a payment).
Hi Peggy!
Charlene
|
415.24 | Emerson info | FSOA::JPALMASON | | Mon Jan 11 1993 12:57 | 8 |
| The difference in price between a private and semi-private room t
Emerson was $30 as of last May. I remember, because I was billed
incorrectly for a private room. Looking back, I should have
probably opted for a private room (roomate was noisy and had a bad
cough at night), oh well. This was through Harvard Community HP. I
also don't remember them having a policy about siblings not visiting
with a semi-private room. My son and husband were there at off-hours
both days. The nurses were very accomodating.
|
415.25 | Definition | WAGON::POMEROY | | Mon Jan 18 1993 09:40 | 4 |
| I'm curious....
How do most hospitals define "semi-private"?, ie how many beds
to a room?
|
415.26 | 2 | OASS::BURDEN_D | Well, it sure beats raising cattle | Mon Jan 18 1993 09:48 | 3 |
| I would guess two, with a sliding curtain between them.
Dave
|
415.27 | HCHP/What's covered | NETWKS::COZZENS | | Fri Jan 29 1993 16:07 | 11 |
| Back to the "What's covered" topic. Emerson Hospital was paid 100%
percent by Harvard Community for my hospital stay and the birth of my
daughter Lindsey. Harvard also paid 100% for all pre-delivery office
visits and for the care for Lindsey when she was born. It did cost me
$3.00 for the post-partum visit though.
As for Emerson and room set up, semi-private is two beds in one room,
two TV's and one bathroom. Rooming in was not allowed for semi-private
rooms, but was for private rooms. (This was in September)
Lisa Cozzens
|
415.28 | Your out alittle too soon now in my book! | FMAJOR::WALTER | used to be Aquilia | Mon Jul 19 1993 12:57 | 27 |
|
I am surprized no one has commented about the new time limitations (is
that the right way to express this?) for hopsital stays?
Harvard Community started this new procedure July 1st, 1993. Hold on
to your seats.
Regular deliveries are out in 24 hours.
C-Sections are out in 72 hours.
I can't imagine being home with a little one, never mind your first
when you need advise or if you have others to care for in 24 hours. I
don't agree with this at all!!!! I am not going to want my mother to
stay with me but feel as though I will not have enough experience to
get through the first couple of days without some kind of help. Am I
worrying too much?
I had an ovary removed in October and spent five days in the hospital
and then 6 weeks home recooperating. How can someone with a C-Section
be home and moving around in 72 hours is beyond me!
Comments?
cj
|
415.29 | | CAD::BOLIO::BENOIT | | Mon Jul 19 1993 13:01 | 10 |
| My wife delivered our second daughter in February, and was out in 24 hours. At
least Fallon gives you the option. If you choose the one day and out they give
you a $100 give certificate to Toys-R-Us or Spags.
I had a double hernia operation in May, and it was done under full anethsia, and
outpatient....cut at 9:00, out by 5:00!
This is where our health care system is headed, so get used to it!
/mtb
|
415.30 | I needed help | BROKE::NIKIN::BOURQUARD | Deb | Mon Jul 19 1993 14:06 | 31 |
| Matthew Thornton Health Plan has had these hospital stay limits for over a year.
And I think you're right to worry. By all means, plan ahead! Consider having
help on hand after you get home. If you can't arrange to have help, let your
doctor know your personal situation.
I had a C-section at 11 pm on a Friday, and was home the following Tuesday.
(I should admit that I was covered by John Hancock, not Matthew Thornton,
but since I have HMO/Elect I was aware of the Matthew Thornton rules. And
I don't think Matthew Thornton would have forced me to go home at 11 pm on
Monday evening :-)
My husband took 4 weeks vacation, and my mom visited for 10 days. And yes,
this was my first.
My mom was *wonderful*. She did all the cooking and cleaning, and when Dan
or I got frustrated because we couldn't seem to console Noelle, she'd take
over baby duty. She offered advice only when asked and was full of
supportive comments. This is the kind of help every mother should receive!
When Mom left, Dan took over dinners until I was more fully on my feet.
The thing I missed most from the hospital was the adjustable bed. And, because
I needed my hands to lower myself from standing into a chair, I needed someone
around to hand me the baby, and to take the baby from me so that I could rise.
BTW, the hospital nursery staff said to call them if it was 2 am and you
were desperate for advice of some sort -- they're up anyway!
Best wishes for a speedy delivery and a baby who quickly learns to sleep through
the night!
- Deb
|
415.31 | Harvard.. I heard that too! | CALS::HEALEY | DTN 297-2426 | Mon Jul 19 1993 14:16 | 12 |
|
re: Carla (Harvard).
I had heard that one too. I didn't know that they had already instituted
it though! I also heard that you will be visited by a nurse for the first
couple of days you are home.
I'm in the same boat as you and my mom lives in Florida (I'm in MA)!
I could ask my MIL but she smokes continuously so I don't want her
staying with me. I guess I'll be on my own, except for my husband.
Karen
|
415.32 | I was there | BUSY::BONINA | | Mon Jul 19 1993 14:17 | 14 |
| I had a c-section and was out in 3 days. At the time I couldn't
believe they were sending me home. It was very emotional, to go home
but that's the day your milk comes in & double duty emotions with it.
Anyway, my husband stayed home with me a whole week when I got home and
when he was ready to go back to work that Monday (or as ready as he
could have been) I was able to get around & handle the baby by myself.
I've had many ovarian cyst operations which were wickedly painful & a
c-section was a walk in the park after that.
I didn't get any sleep in the hospital, I felt like every time I was
just getting to sleep they were checking my vidal or attaching this
very hungry stranger to my breast. When I got home I got
sleep......
|
415.33 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:01 | 5 |
| A friend who's an OB nurse told me that most new mothers have no idea how to
handle a baby. When mothers were kept in the hospital for a while, they at
least had the opportunity to ask questions and get instructions. Imagine
having never driven a car, being handed the keys to an expensive new car,
and being told to drive it home alone.
|
415.34 | | CAD::BOLIO::BENOIT | | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:04 | 1 |
| Especially when the car has a mind of it's own! ;-)
|
415.35 | St. V's Gives Instruction | BUSY::BONINA | | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:15 | 12 |
| I was in for 72 hours and was given super instruction from St.
Vincent's in Worcester. They had someone talk with me for hours on
every subject - I felt like they really listen! After they gave me
morning instruction, they came back every couple of hours to chat and
see if I had more questions. I really felt like they knew I was there
only for a short time, but in that time they'd do everything they could
to help me feel comfortable with my new little person. The day I left
several folks said to call if I thought of anything else I needed
answers too.
I was very very lucky. I'll never ever forget those very special
people.
|
415.36 | Are other services offered to make the short stay manageable? | DECWET::WOLFE | | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:51 | 22 |
| With my HMO if you are out in less than 36 hours, a nurse comes to
visit you at home. The home visit is both to check on the baby and do
a "quick" physical check of mom (which was great since I wasn't prepared
for the physical stuff that happens after the baby). At our request
the nurse checked the baby's room for any potential hazards. As
careful as we were she made some good suggestions.
My baby also had jaundice and they sent a device (called a "wallaby")
home with us so we actually had a home nurse come every morning for 6
days. She would draw blood and the hospital would call with the
results. My husband and I preferred this to the "light treatment"
traditionally used at the hospital.
My preference was to be home so the scenario the HMO outlined worked
great. You might check if your HMO has a hotline, ours has one can
call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. And as a new mom, these nurses
were essential. They even called back to follow-up on the baby.
So hopefully your hospital offers other services to make the shortened
hospital stay manageable. I also assume any complications would
automatically lengthen the stay.
|
415.37 | Spin docters at work | KELVIN::BARTLETT | | Tue Jul 20 1993 12:50 | 14 |
| Our youngest daughter was born 10 weeks ago, and my wife came home 24 hours
after the delivery. Our HMO (Healthsource) had told us that their policy is
24 hours, but that she could have stayed another day if she really felt that
she needed to (because they changed their policy while she was still pregnant).
Fortunately, Lisa was doing very well and came home early.
What bugged me was that Healthsource never came out and told us about this
change when they made it last April! We found out about it through friends who
had happened to call them. We did get notification of the change in the most
recent newsletter that they sent out, and I got a real kick at the "spin" that
they did with it: something like "to serve you better" and "since most people
heal faster at home" etc.
Greg B.
|
415.38 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Tue Jul 20 1993 12:59 | 26 |
|
We use MTHP and this past March I delivered Griffin (10.2 lbs) and
was out of the hospital in less than 24 hours.
I was very worried before hand as my first delivery was very
difficult and I was in the hospital from Monday to Thursday with him. I
couldn't even conceive of leaving the hospital 24 hours after my second
delivery!
But the second delivery was (ultimately) easier. With Spencer being
at home, me being in the hospital with Griffin and receiving only pills
for pain every few hours, I felt I wanted to be home more than stay in
the hospital.
I ended up having a few complications and needed to be seen by the
midwives a few days later, but overall, I would have much rather been
at home than away. They also sent me home with medications and a nurse
called me the next day to see how things were going (they tend to be
alittle more relaxed aorund second and more times moms).
Every delivery is different, if you are not ready to go home for
physical reasons, they won't let you, if you are not ready to go home
for emotional reasons, then being in the hospital is not the answer but
a support system is.
Wendy
|
415.39 | ? | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Tue Jul 20 1993 14:41 | 11 |
| RE: 37 (HealthSource)
Greg,
I am surprised at the 24 hour hospital stay that you mentioned. We have
had HealthSource as our HMO for over 5 years. Both my children (ages
4 yrs and 14 months) were born "on the HealthSource plan". Both times I
was in the hospital for 2 days after birth. I know that HealthSource
pays you some money if you return home in 24 hours.
Shaila
|
415.40 | 24 hours seems the norm all around... | NASZKO::DISMUKE | WANTED: New Personal Name | Tue Jul 20 1993 14:54 | 9 |
| I just talked with my girlfriend's husband - I've been trying to call
as yesterday was her due date with her first. Sure enough, she had her
baby last night at 5:00pm. John said he was taking a shower and
picking up a few things and he's off to bring them home. I don't know
what kind of insurance they have, but this is in New Mexico, so I guess
it's not a regional thing.
-sandy
|
415.41 | don't like this trend | DV780::DORO | | Wed Jul 21 1993 13:04 | 25 |
| 24 hours seems awfully quick - especially if you don't have a support
network to go home to.
When my first was born, there wsa NO WAY I could have gone home ni 24
hours.... I was EXHAUSTED. #2 was a much easier delivery, but I was
still more than ready to get pampered for an extra night, and stock up
on some sleep. (FWIW, we don't have any family we can call on, so our
only option would be to HIRE a nurse or mother's helper)
The hospital I was in uses the time for lots of training - help in
nursing, how to bathe the child, general operating instructions( 8-} )
and the like.
Has there been any studies on the long term effects of incresed
activity very soon after birth? I know that pioneer women gave birth in the
fields, etc,....But they also died at a younger age, and a prolapsed
uterus isn't any fun.
My first take on this new policy is not good. Seems to be another
example of saving money at one point, so that someone else can spend
even MORE at another point in the process.
Jamd
|
415.42 | | GOOEY::ROLLMAN | | Thu Jul 22 1993 12:46 | 17 |
|
I used the MT midwives (in NH), but actually have John
Hancock. JH will pay for 48 hours, but the MT policy
is 24, for all patients.
However, I gave birth at 6:30AM, and the following
morning the midwife asked if I wanted to go home that
day or stay another night. Apparently, it is much more
the medical provider discretion than a rigid policy.
She said she would keep me another night if I wanted it,
and that my insurance coverage had nothing to do with it.
(I was already packed, BTW. I wanted out. My mother
was waiting at home to pamper me and the baby).
Pat
|
415.43 | mixed messages | SALES::LTRIPP | | Wed Jul 28 1993 12:16 | 29 |
| When AJ was born in Jan'87 I managed to somehow get real special
"privileges" I went home on the SEVENTH day after delivery! By the
fifth evening I was hearing comments from the staff of "what are you
still doing here?" My OB had somehow "fudged" the paperwork since my
sone was in NICU, and I had made it clear I wasn't going too far from
my newborn. He wrote some gobbledygook about me having a UTI and it
was medically necessary to stay. Who cares, it worked! I had him on
Friday evening, went home Thursday morning, was back in to visit him in
NICU at suppertime that night, and even though I'd been told NOT to
drive, I drove myself to the hospital the next morning, and was there
by 6:30 a.m.! Spent most of the morning there, was back up that
evening with my inlaws and my husband, went up Saturday morning and
evening (despite a major blizzard) and was overjoyed to bring him home
on Sunday morning! It was also convienient that while at the hospital
I had the chance to use their electric breast pump, until the rented
one had arrived at home.
As AJ had to have subsequent surgeries and as I approached John Hancock
for addmission dates, they had to send a doctor's request to their
"medical review" team to justify ANY preop days, and he ligitimately
needed several days of preparation for his operations.
Personally I resent that on a day as stressful as surgery, you are
required to haul yourself out of bed before sunup to get to the
hospital for 6 or 6:30 a.m. I personally would prefer a good (well how
good is it in a hospital?) night's sleep and just go straight to the
surgery. (Just MHO)
Lyn
|
415.44 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | John 3:16 - Your life depends on it! | Wed Jul 28 1993 13:50 | 8 |
|
Does anyone know if Tufts has changed it's policy regarding
length of stay post-partum ?
I believe at the beginning of the year it was 48 hours for
a vaginal delivery....
Karen
|
415.45 | 2 days | WHEEL::POMEROY | | Thu Jul 29 1993 10:45 | 14 |
| I have Tufts and questioned them, I believe in April what
is covered. They said "basic stay". I then asked for a
definition of "basic stay" and they said 2 days.
I am due in 2 weeks, I certainly hope they didn't change
it!
If you find out differently, please let me know.
Peggy
P.S. Tufts also covers child birth classes. You have to
send in a receipt and your certificate. Plan on waiting
about 4 weeks for reimbursement however!
|
415.46 | | HELIX::LEGER | | Thu Jul 29 1993 11:15 | 14 |
| Peggy
Tufts pays for Child birth classes? Thats great! How did you find out
about this?
I am not due until January, but it never hurts to think
ahead...espically if I can get reimbursed for something
Also, where did you send the reciept for reimbursement?
Thanks
Anne Marie
|
415.47 | | WHEEL::POMEROY | | Thu Jul 29 1993 11:41 | 22 |
| Anne Marie,
The Lamaze instructor said to check our insurance, that
some of them cover it. So I called Tufts.
You have to send the paperwork into the Waltham Claims
office... the address is listed on the back of your card.
I put our policy # on the top of the paperwork in BIG
numbers, so they couldn't miss it.
Beware, it takes awhile for the reimbursement. It took
2 weeks just to make it into the "system". Then it takes
another 2-3 weeks for a check to be cut. We sent ours in
a month ago and I'm still waiting.
It's nice to be reimbursed, especially when the class cost
$70!
Good luck with the rest of your pregnancy!
Peggy
|
415.48 | Does Harvard cover Child care? | CALS::HEALEY | DTN 297-2426 | Thu Jul 29 1993 12:49 | 8 |
|
re: Child care classes.
Does anybody know if Harvard pays for Child Care classes? I have to pay
$70 to the medical group which I use. They serve Harvard Community Health
Plan patients primarily, but also other patients.
Karen
|
415.49 | | HELIX::LEGER | | Thu Jul 29 1993 15:52 | 10 |
| Ouch! $70 for someone to teach me how to relax and breath?
Well, I guess I have no choice :-)....I hope I get my $70 worth, then
again, from the stories I have heard, maybe I would rather a C-section,
but, then again, I have no choice in the matter....Mother nature will
run her course... :-)
Thanks for the info, I will keep in in mind when the time comes
Anne Marie
|
415.50 | My 2 cents | BUSY::BONINA | | Thu Jul 29 1993 16:11 | 3 |
| I had to pay $70 too. It was worth every penny!!!!! I not only
enjoyed the classes, but enjoyed sharing in the joy of everyone in the
same "prego" state.
|
415.51 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | John 3:16 - Your life depends on it! | Thu Jul 29 1993 17:15 | 5 |
|
Perhaps you can shop around for classes. Ours was $45 last
year...
Karen
|
415.52 | There's a "weekend away" course | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Fri Jul 30 1993 10:26 | 22 |
|
The one I just enrolled in is $50.00, at Nashua Memorial Hospital. And
after we "pass" the class and get the certificate, Matthew Thornton
will reimburse 100%.
I was told to go through Member Services for the details of all of
this.
There is also an interesting class offered at the Clarion Somerset
Hotel in Nashua. It's all day Sat, Sat. night and all day Sunday.
They do the childbirth classes plus a few other little "tips". The
cost includes the overnight stay and lunch Sat and Brunch (lunch?)
Sunday. And then you're done with it. It's a w/end with lots of
pregnant couples. It's offered after your 6th month, and is run
quarterly, according to the brochure I received.
I believe the cost was $170.00 for the weekend, for BOTH people.
Matthew Thornton will reimburse $50.00 of that ....
Sounded like a good time ....
Patty
|
415.53 | hmmmm | SALES::LTRIPP | | Fri Jul 30 1993 11:31 | 9 |
| Patty,
With a deal like that I only regret not being prego!!
I wonder if they do "gift certificates", for my Sister Inlaw who is due
in February?
Lyn
|
415.54 | Nashua Mem. | SALEM::GILMAN | | Fri Jul 30 1993 13:22 | 3 |
| A plug for Nashu Memorial: I had surgery there a couple of years ago
and I was treated with the utmost concern for my comfort and safety.
They went above the call to duty to treat me well.
|
415.55 | | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Mon Aug 02 1993 11:51 | 18 |
| re.53 Lynn, I will try to remember to bring in the brochure - I don't
see why they WOULDN'T let you do it as a "gift" - the only question
would be getting reimbursed, if you wanted that $50.00 back - your SIL
would probably have to do that part.
As for Nashua Memorial - Jason was born there 5.5 years ago, and aside
from one nurse who I'd have liked to have killed at the time, the whole
experience was really wonderful and QUITE a lot different than when
Chris was born at Framingham Union Hospital. I still remember at
F.U.H., the nurse came in and *FREAKED* out because I had him laying in
my lap, instead of holding him, while I was watching TV. Once I was
done feeding him, they wanted him back in the nursery. Of course that
was 8 years ago, so maybe things have changed. With Jason, he was in
my room the WHOLE time except the very last night, when they were
pretty adamant that they'd rather just let me get some sleep.
#3 is supposed to be born at Nashua Memorial as well - providing he
doesn't have any suddenly different ideas! (-:
|
415.56 | Anonymous noter seeks input | CNTROL::STOLICNY | | Wed Jan 05 1994 15:48 | 36 |
| The following is being posted for a member of the PARENTING notesfile
community who prefers to remain anonymous at this time. If you wish
to contact the author by mail, please send your message to me and I will
forward it to the anonymous noter. Your message will be forwarded with
your name attached unless you request otherwise.
Carol Stolicny, PARENTING co-mod
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am 8 - 11 weeks pregnant (the due date is in question due to spotting
which might have been a period) so I had my first prenatal doctor's
appointment. Because I am not familiar with any of the physicians in my plan,
the first appointment was with a nurse practitioner.
I have the HMO Elect with Hardvard Community Health and I go to the
Southboro Medical center. I am looking for answers and recommendations to
several concerns listed below.
BTW - I am 40, had cancer of the cervix several years ago and I have
uterine fibroids. This is my first pregnancy. (And I am absolutely THRILLED!)
1. The affiliated hospital is Framingham Union. I live over an hour away
from this hospital and I am wondering if I should be concerned.
St Vincent's Hospital in Worcester is an easy commute and my gynecologist
is there (I pay through the John Hancock portion of the plan)
HCHP is not affiliated with this hospital, would I have any luck
having HCHP pay the bills if it is outside of their plan?
Am I stuck w/ Framingham Union. (I'll be calling HCHP today to discuss
whether I can do this) - I was wondering if anyone else has?
2. If you had a birthing experience at Framingham Union, was it positive?
3. What is the typical hospital bill for a delivery these days?
Any other words of wisdom would be appreciated? ;^)
|
415.57 | | BROKE::STEVE5::BOURQUARD | Deb | Wed Jan 05 1994 16:13 | 29 |
| First, congratulations!!! How exciting to have these kinds of things to
worry about :-)
I can't help you out on your local scene, but I too had a baby using HMO Elect.
Like you, I see an ob/gyn outside the HMO using the John Hancock part of the
plan. I chose to have my baby delivered by the out-of-plan ob/gyn. I'm
quite pleased with my choice, but I'm also about $2700 poorer for the
experience. My (and the baby's) total hospital bill rang in at over $10K.
(This was in '92 in Nashua, NH.) Granted, I ended up with a C-section and a
4-day hospital stay. While this is far longer than you *might* have, you'll
want to be prepared for all contingencies. If you choose this option and
you're not much of a gambler, then you'll want to be sure that you can handle
the max. out-of-pocket under the policy should the need arise. There's always
a small-but-non-zero chance that the baby might need specialized care running
into megabucks.
I'm sure there are people who think I'm nuts for paying these out of pocket
expenses when I could have had the baby for "free" using the HMO. But I
consider the peace of mind that I had to be worth quite a few $$ (obviously :-)
Regarding the length of time to get to the hospital: the vast majority of
births (and especially first births) take well over one hour. But there
are always the exceptions... This is clearly something that you'll want to
discuss with the ob/gyn handling your pregnancy.
Again, congratulations and best wishes for a comfortable pregnancy and a
safe, easy delivery!!
|
415.58 | my 2 cents | XPOSE::POIRIER | | Thu Jan 06 1994 15:36 | 18 |
|
You must consider if you are in a position to pay both the maximum out
of pocket for yourself, and then the max for the child (if you will not
have an HMO doctor available for the child) if anything goes wrong for
either of you.
I came across that during open enrollment while pregnant for my first.
I did not take the gamble, turns out that my "low risk" pregnancy
delivered 14 weeks premature.
The second time around, I got to have the doctor of my choice. I
insured myself through Digital and my husband carried a family policy
for an HMO doctor for the baby --
It's a tough choice to have to make. But I am glad I prepared for
"worst case".
|
415.59 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Jan 06 1994 16:35 | 2 |
| Isn't the out-of-pocket max for HMO Elect much higher than the out-of-pocket
max for the Digital Medical Plans?
|
415.60 | more HCHP options | LJSRV1::LOOMIS | | Mon Jan 10 1994 13:45 | 12 |
| re: .56
You can transfer from one HCHP center to another. If you're
uncomfortable delivering at Framingham, check out the HCHP book to see
if another hosipital closer to you is covered by another center. You
can then transfer (it took me 10 days) and though you might not be
as happy with your primary physician, during your pregnancy most of
your care will be through your ob/gyn. Also, you can sign your baby up
at a different center than yourself, if you find a pedi you like
elsewhere. Its a bit complicated, but worked for me.
diane
|
415.61 | When switching insurance... | WONDER::ENGDAHL | Meaghan Engdahl DTN 293-5957 | Mon Jan 10 1994 13:57 | 5 |
|
When switching insurance, is pregnancy considered a preexisting
condition?
Thanks/M.
|
415.62 | switching insurance | XPOSE::POIRIER | | Mon Jan 10 1994 14:01 | 8 |
|
I switched insurance during open enrollment with both pregnancies, it
was not a problem. I'm not sure what would happen outside the open
enrollment period.
-b
|
415.63 | | DV780::DORO | Donna Quixote | Mon Jan 10 1994 14:27 | 10 |
|
Hmm, make a call, and ASK!!!
With TFSOs, etc, I checked with my husband's health providers.
They said that if I had been diagnosed by a docter as being pregnant
and THEN switched, it WOULD be pre-existing. The key was to not go to
the doctor for "the rabbit test" until after I switched....
Jamd
|
415.64 | | WWDST1::MGILBERT | Education Reform starts at home.... | Wed Jan 12 1994 10:52 | 18 |
| Over the years I have had numerous experiences with
Framingham Union Hospital. I am also an HCHP Southboro
customer. My two youngest children were both born at
Framingham and the experience was certainly better for
all of us than it was at a Boston hospital with our
oldest. They do have a very caring and competent staff.
They do offer their own childbirth instruction and they
do offer maternity tours so that you can see the
environment. While I did live in Framingham at the time
I would think that the commute really isn't all that
tough. It's location is such that it is pretty hard to
get lost. I've had friends and relatives from Auburn
and Millbury who have had their children at FUH.
BTW - FUH is world renowned as a cardiac research
hospital.
|
415.65 | Some flexibility | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Mon Jan 17 1994 13:20 | 9 |
| While I was pregnant last year I had HMO Elect and was with HCHP in Acton. I
had a high risk pregnancy and when it came time for me to be referred to an
approved ob.,my primary care physician offered me the choice of going into Boston
or staying with local doctor and delivering at Emerson Hospital in Concord. I
chose to stay with Emerson. Later the ob. told me that if I went into labor
before 34 weeks he would refer me to Worcester Memorial or into Boston (my
choice). Fortunately I didn't need to be referred.
Kathy
|
415.66 | 1 baby at FUH, an hour from home | CLOUD9::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Tue Jan 25 1994 15:43 | 21 |
|
My first son was born at FUH, when I was living in Nashua, NH at the
time. It's about an hour's drive, and the commute was really really
hard on my husband. It was also a real pain if he just forgot
something at the house, or I wanted something "special", he couldn't
just buzz home and get it.
I was in the hospital for 8 days (C-section, and I'm diabetic, and the
baby was very jaundice etc etc). I stuck with FUH because my Dr at the
time was Dr. Wilson from the Southboro Medical Group, and I didn't want
to switch Dr's part-way through my pregnancy, especially being a
high-risk pregnancy.
In general my experiences with FUH have been positive - that was almost
9 years ago though, so my information isn't very current. I would
strongly weigh the inconvenience of a long drive for "visiting" reasons
though.
CONGRATULATIONS!!! and Good Luck!
Patty
|
415.67 | HMO won't cover epidural | CNTROL::STOLICNY | | Wed May 11 1994 10:25 | 27 |
|
The following is being posted for a member of the PARENTING notesfile
community who prefers to remain anonymous at this time. If you wish
to contact the author by mail, please send your message to me and I will
forward it to the anonymous noter. Your message will be forwarded with
your name attached unless you request otherwise.
Carol Stolicny, PARENTING co-mod
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm entering this in order to get suggestions for my sister who
is currently 4 months pregnant.
She was informed at her first doctor's visit that her HMO will
NOT cover an epidural for her delivery. Apparently HMOs pay an
anasthesiologist less than other health plans, thus the ruling. They
deem it medically unnecessary.
This is her second pregnancy, had an epidural with the first and
definitely wants one for this delivery. When she sounded shocked by
this rule, her doctor (new to her) tried to downplay the need for an
epidural.
Any suggestions on how to handle this situation? She doesn't
need the added stress of battling an HMO and is prepared to pay out
of pocket for it need be.
This ruling sounds outrageous, verging on unethical if not
illegal. Or can HMOs do whatever they please?
thanks-
|
415.68 | I'd check with the HMO | STOWOA::GIUNTA | | Wed May 11 1994 10:35 | 22 |
| If I were her, I'd call the HMO and find out the whole story. It has
been my experience with 2 different HMO's that they will pay for
whatever the doctor deems medically necessary. So I'd ask a few
questions if I were in her shoes. Is this the same doctor she had for
the last delivery? If not, maybe he doesn't want to do the epidural for
some reason. If she needed it the last time, maybe she needs to
discuss it more with her doctor to see what criteria he uses to
determine if it is medically necessary.
I have also found that different doctors groups under the same HMO plan
follow different rules. I have heard that my HMO doesn't cover some
things sort of as a general rule of thumb, but when I was switching and
right after I switched, I found out that as long as my doctor wrote the
referral for a particular sevice, that was all that was needed for it
to be covered. That's a whole lot different than the experiences other
people have had with the same HMO for similar problems.
I guess I'd do some more legwork to find out what the HMO's rules
really are, and what criteria they use for exceptions [and there are
always exceptions].
Cathy
|
415.69 | I second that: check with the HMO | SUPER::HARRIS | | Wed May 11 1994 17:09 | 8 |
| I agree that your sister needs to check directly with the
HMO. We are no longer in an HMO but, when we were, there
was DEFINITE differnce between my Primary Care Physician,
my son's, and my husband's. Two were willing to do whatever
was necessary and/or requested. The third was very tight-
fisted.
Peggy
|
415.70 | | DKAS::DKAS::WIKOFF_T | Tanya Wikoff, MR01-3 297-2087, Home is wherever your loved ones are. | Wed May 11 1994 18:28 | 43 |
| "Medically necessary" and a doctor's advice is likely to change with
circumstances. For instance, if petocine (sp?) is used for induction or
to speed up delivery, it is usually more painful than natural labor, and
mothers are more likely to request and be granted anesthesia. (But there
is a balancing act between the two drugs than partially counteract each
other which is in the hands of a skilled anethesiologist... statistically
an epidural raises the odds for a cesarian.)
"Unethical", however starts to sound too strong to me. I don't want
to argue with a mother's choice, especially an informed one, but...
I've had several mothers of two babies tell me that one of their
epidural's was _wonderful_ , and the other was _not_ wonderful. (Again,
circumstances vary.) And information for her on different situations
and choices may help her with personal and financial decisions.
If the mother must stay within her health plan, she may benefit from
more information about labor choices (medical choices/benefits/risks and
techniques for coping with "natural" labor) that are given in prenatal
courses that include Lamaze (etc.) techniques. More information and
preparation is always a help. Drugs can be wonderful, and so can labor
be without... (again, circumstances vary!) I only say this because it
sounded like the doctor was trying to communicate with her, and it will
be very important for their communication and trust in each other to grow!
So from an insurance point of view, I can see the perspective of this being
an elective procedure that may be only partially covered (...in some
circumstances!). Do they partially cover it, rather than totally out of
pocket? In the meantime, while she follows up with the HMO
(and they _do_ pay attention to customer's reactions, as I've found recently
when asking about one-vs-two day stays...), she should also follow up with
other patients of the doctor and hospital to get a feeling for how supportive
of the mother they are. Hospitals have been competing for the baby business,
and some are developing a reputation of a caring bedside manner and listening
to the mothers and their coaches during labor. When it comes to your
comfort in the experience, the personal relationships (including their
attitude toward your right to request treatments and refuse interventions),
will have as much or more of an impact as the actual treatments used.
So, as well as talking and writing the HMO, get more info to back up
your discussions, and find a doctor and hospital you can communicate with!
Best Wishes!
Tanya
|
415.71 | | NPSS::BRANAM | Steve, Network Product Support | Wed Jun 01 1994 14:41 | 18 |
| Definitely push back. While epidurals are optional, I got the
impression they were a pretty standard option, virtually
always available for those who wanted them. Check back with
the HMO. If they say it is the Dr's discretion, there
are still a few months to find a new OB and get in some
pre-natal visits if her current Dr won't budge. If it really
means a lot to her, he should appreciate the stress of her
worrying about it. I certainly don't advocate doing a
procedure solely because someone wants to have it (and
no HMO is going to do that these days!), but this is a common
procedure for childbirth. My wife had epidurals for both
deliveries, and loved them. The second we all but had to
wake her up to tell her it was time to deliver! Find out
exactly why the Dr doesn't support it. Maybe he genuinely
feels they are not necessary or has some medical concerns,
or maybe he's a sexist jerk who thinks women were born to
have babies and should live with the pain (doubtful, but
you never know!).
|
415.72 | My younger son, Justin | CSC32::DUBOIS | Be horizontal, with honor! | Wed Jul 20 1994 14:57 | 36 |
| Well, this is more along the line of "who's covered, and who's not."
For seven or eight YEARS now I have tried to get Digital to cover my
entire family under my health insurance, just like they do for my
heterosexual coworkers. Most of you know what health problems Justin
has had since he was born in Oct, 1992. Digital has never covered him,
despite the fact that I was paying for *family* coverage under the
John Hancock expensive medical plan. They only counted it as for
Evan and myself. Justin and Shellie had to be covered under her job,
so my family has been paying for *two* family plans.
Shellie was laid off from her job a few months ago. COBRA for her and
Justin would be around $500 a month. Colorado Springs isn't exactly friendly
toward gays, and both of our lawyers recommended that we *not* try to
adopt each other's birth child here. Colorado's laws had been set up so
that if I were to try to adopt Justin, Shellie would have had to give up
her legal status with him AND HE COULD HAVE GONE TO ANYONE WHO WANTED TO
ADOPT HIM; we could have lost him forever.
Finally, a few months ago, one of the lawyers gave us an alternative: permanent
legal guardianship. On May 17 we went to court (spent $2,000 we didn't
really have, since Shellie had been laid off) and Shellie and I became
permanent legal guardians to each other's birth child. Shellie's former
company said there would be no problem covering Evan under her insurance
(COBRA now or soon). DIGITAL, on the other hand, had to think about it.
It is now 2 months later and I just found out that they are *probably* going
to put Justin on my insurance ("unless we hear otherwise...") but that they
ALMOST TOOK EVAN OFF OF MY INSURANCE BECAUSE SHELLIE IS HIS GUARDIAN!!!!
Dear God, you can't win for losing!!!!!!
(Can you tell I'm just a *trifle* miffed?)
I think I'll go get lunch.
Carol
|
415.73 | Would coverage continue if pregnant prior to TFSO. | AKOCOA::OUELLETTE | | Tue Aug 02 1994 13:48 | 12 |
|
I have a question I hope someone might have an answer to..
With Digital downsizing, If my wife (who does not work) was
to become pregnant prior to myself becoming TfSOed, would
the medical coverage for maternity be covered right through
the end of the pregnacy, or would it end after my package
$ runs out?
Thanks,
Bill
|
415.74 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | skewered shitake | Tue Aug 02 1994 14:47 | 2 |
| I think you would have to continue the insurance through COBRA out of
your own pocket.
|