T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
320.1 | | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts is TOO slow | Sun Sep 20 1992 23:19 | 11 |
| You can't make him wear his seatbelt. (There was a
Letter-To-The-Editor in the local paper today from a guy complaining
about being ticketed for not wearing his seat belt. That's a $75 fine
here in Texas.)
The way to explain it to Matthew is to tell him that not everyone does
the right thing (just wait until the subject of cigarettes comes up)
and that until he is an adult living out on his own, he will have to do
as you say.
Bob
|
320.2 | I've been there | SAHQ::HERNDON | Atlanta D/S | Mon Sep 21 1992 10:35 | 51 |
| Boy can I relate to this one....but mine turned out to be a happy
ending....
My hubby was the same way....some of his comments were:
If I die, I die, some people die *because* they are wearing thier
seatbelt, no one is going to *force* me to do anything...we lived
in Colorado and he was at Fort Carson.
Now, he is a paramedic in Atlanta....just about every shift he sees broken
faces, severe head injuries, dead people that have gone through
the windshield, etc. He's even had a baby die that the mother was
holding on her lap because she was just going 1/4 mile to the store.
He won't even start the car unless everyone has their seatbelt on.
He said he was stupid to not realize that seatbelts really do save
your life. Just because you don't hear of someone everyday getting
thier life saved because of a seatbelt, doesn't mean it isn't
happening. Yeah, I don't think the government has any business
telling adults to wear a seatbelt, but I'd wear one anyways.
Every so often he'll get someone that says, "I always wear my seatbelt,
and I just didn't this time" as he's trying to bandage their head.
Are there any kind of tapes you can rent that show accidents with
victims not wearing seatbelts? Have him go to
a fire station and talk to a paramedic....sometimes they'll even
let you go on calls....depends on the station.
As far as your child, just make a rule. The car does not start
unless he is in a seatbelt. And when he asks why daddy doesn't,
let your husband explain it....I bet he will find it difficult to
justify it.
I work with a couple of people that have 3 kids each. They are
9, 6, 3. When I bought my minivan, they both told me how great it
is for kids. When their tired, they can sleep on the seats and on the
floor. I asked them about seatbelts and they said...Ahh...don't have
to worry about that. When you're on the highway, nothing will happen.
Since then, I can't believe all the kids I see that run around in cars.
I am just appalled that these people think this way...and I work with
them. A 3 year old should be in a car seat....I just can't believe it.
You have a tough battle....I think some of us don't need to see what
can happen, and we wear ours....other people need to actually see
what can happen before they wear theirs...it's too bad....but I'm
glad my hubby came to his senses...
Good Luck...kristen
|
320.3 | Here's one of *those* stories... | ICS::NELSONK | | Mon Sep 21 1992 10:43 | 14 |
| I guess you will get a lot of "if it hadn't been for seatbelts,
I wouldn't be here" notes -- but it's true. I was in an accident
on I-75 in Kentucky about 10 years ago, and some jackass cut me
off -- I swerved into the high speed lane to avoid rearending this
clown and got broadsided by another driver. Did the ol' 360 two
or three times -- this is at 65 mph, mind you -- and damn near
went over an embankment. But I was able to bring the car under
control. (Yes, your life DOES flash before your eyes.) I had
a bruised knee and general aches and pains. My sister, who was
with me, had the s*** scared out of her. We spent the night in
Kentucky, got the car as fixed as we could get it, and went on
our way the next day.
Seatbelts, I love you....
|
320.4 | | MR4DEC::SHALLAN | | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:09 | 8 |
| I always wear my seatbelt and I woln't start the car until my daughters
have their seatbelts buckled. My parents don't like to wear their
seatbelts, but if they are in my car I insist that they wear them.
I got some flack about this at first, but I simply told them that I
didn't want their grandchildren to live with the trauma of watching
their grandmother or grandfather going through the windshield if we
were ever in an accident.
|
320.5 | one idea | GEMVAX::WARREN | | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:56 | 6 |
| The way I finally got my father to wear a seatbelt in my car was to buy
a car with passive seatbelts (i.e., the shoulder belt, at least, moves
into place automatically when you shut the door).
-Tracy
|
320.6 | | MR4DEC::SHALLAN | | Mon Sep 21 1992 13:37 | 11 |
| re: 5
Tracy,
Those passive seatbelts are worthless if not used with the lapbelt.
A friend of mine was was killed recently because all he was using was
the shoulder harness without the lap belt. He was ejected from the
car throught the windshield. I personally feel that those automatic
shoulder harnessess are very dangerous, they give people a false sense
of security. (IMHO).
|
320.7 | A cute quote | POWDML::GERRITS | | Mon Sep 21 1992 14:02 | 18 |
| I once saw a bumpersticker or something with this quote, which later
became a ritual for my husband and me...
"Fasten your seat belt, cause I love you."
Now, if we're driving along and he realizes that he didn't put it on
before I do, he'll say with a pout that I forgot to say the phrase!
It's become something cute and loving between us.
However, from the sounds of it, you've basically appealed to your
husband in a similar way. I agree with the second noter (I think) that
you could explain to Matthew (?) that all adults don't always do the
right thing, but encourage your son to follow your example.
Good luck.
Lynn
|
320.8 | He was RIGHT! | SEIC::MAZZUCOTELLI | | Mon Sep 21 1992 14:20 | 16 |
| I don't think it is a safety issue with your husband. I think he knows
what could happen in an accident. I think what you're coming up
against is the issue of being "right". In his mind it is more
important to stand up for what he feels is his undeniable right (to NOT
wear a seatbelt).
Let me explain by example...
A Mack truck is coming at you head on in your lane. You know you're
right because you are driving in YOUR lane. The question you must
answer is, do you want to be right (and dead) or are you willing to bend
a little?
BTW, we all do this, some people to a greater extent.
Jane
|
320.9 | old childhood joke | TLE::RANDALL | The Year of Hurricane Bonnie | Mon Sep 21 1992 14:28 | 4 |
| "Here lies the body of Jacob Jay
Who died maintaining his right of way
He was right, dead right, as he rolled along,
But he's just as dead as if he'd been dead wrong."
|
320.10 | just you wait, Dad (snicker snicker) | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Laura | Mon Sep 21 1992 14:55 | 26 |
| I've been very concerned about certain of my husband's bad habits,
which I won't detail in this public forum to save him embarrassment.
Anyway, I was concerned that our daughter would imitate them.
It's interesting that these bad habits are gradually being replaced
with better habits. I don't nag (much ;-) or try to dominate him, but
I don't hide my opinions either. For whatever reason, I am seeing
quite an improvement.
I did set my mind that for whatever of his (or my own) bad habits
persist, I'll just tell Ilona, "Do as I say and not as I do." I'm not
recommending that as a general theory of child rearing, but if all else
fails, what else can you say? We're all humans and none of us is
perfect. So we'll just do the best we can.
Does your Sunday newspaper carry the Curtis cartoon? Curtis is always
removing his Dad's cigarettes and lecturing Dad about the hazards of
smoking. By now, Dad is getting really mad since this has been going
on for at least a year. :-)
To answer the base note, why not tell Dad, "Just wait until Junior gets
indoctrinated into seat belt use and scolds you each time you get in
the car." That is the most likely outcome, actually. Junior has been
in the seatbelt habit since birth, remember.
L
|
320.11 | There is no worse nag than a kid | 57784::PCLX31::Satow | | Tue Sep 22 1992 09:14 | 20 |
| re: .10
Though it may not be of much help to the base noter now, I agree with Laura.
Once kids have been gotten a few messages they can be quite merciless about
reminding their parents. Just as example,
1. My children were the ones who ultimately got my father-in-law to begin
using his seat belt.
2. In V3, there was a discussion of a child using the term "druggie" to
refer to her father because he smoked.
3. I don't remember what grade it was, but at one of the open houses at my
daughter's school, the class had cut out pictures out of the newpaper
and pasted them on a sheet of paper entitled "things I like" etc. Of
the "Things I hate" pages, I would estimate 80% had a picture of a
cigarette, and 75% had a picture of a bottle of booze or a beer.
Clay
|
320.12 | personal preferance | LUDWIG::SADIN | Education not alienation... | Tue Sep 22 1992 22:51 | 25 |
|
> Of the "Things I hate" pages, I would estimate 80% had a picture of a
> cigarette, and 75% had a picture of a bottle of booze or a beer.
Just wait until the little troopers get into high-school....:):):)
Re: seatbelts
I personally don't like to wear my seatbelt. And yes, I know what
can happen to a person who is not wearing a seatbelt...I've had it
happen to me. I hit a large tree head on (on the drivers side no less)
doing 65+ mph. Broke my jaw and my hand, gave myself a good concussion
and damn near bled to death before the paramedics got there. A seat
belt may have helped me, but that's not the point. I just don't care
for them and it's a personal choice.
If someone is not aware of the possible dangers involved, then
educate them. If they are aware but choose not to wear the seatbelt
anyway, then that's their choice....
just my 2�
jim s.
|
320.13 | I disagree, but that is just MO | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Wed Sep 23 1992 04:48 | 16 |
| > If someone is not aware of the possible dangers involved, then
> educate them. If they are aware but choose not to wear the seatbelt
> anyway, then that's their choice....
Accident injuries resulting from people not wearing seatbelts are more serious
and require more medical care than if people don't wear them. This makes
everybodies insurance rates go up.
In Europe, it is law that you wear them. If you don't, you get fined on the
spot. There are police who are stationed at toll booths and police checks
who enforce this (along with children in the rear seat, child seats,
properly functioning lights, etc.) I think this is only goodness but that's,
just MHO.
Cheryl
|
320.14 | Two Cars ? | LARVAE::DRSD20::GALVIN | Been there, seen it, done it | Wed Sep 23 1992 06:58 | 70 |
|
You could refuse to be in the same car as him if he doesn't belt up. I
suppose this is quite drastic, negative, and argument inducing, but at
least he would get the point. Sounds like male pride and stubborness (
spelling ? ) is getting in the ways of his commonsense.
As a passenger I went _THROUGH_ a laminated windscreen because the
driver said the seatbelt didn't work and as such I didn't wear it. I
wasn't a pretty sight for a long time ( some would say I'm still not
:-) ) and I wouldn't want to inflict it on anybody else.
Some other points:
o If you and your SO argue infront of your child then does this mean
you authority will be deminished in the eyes of your child so that
he/she will tend to argue back whenever you try to impose a unwanted
rule ?
o Will your child copy your father by lapsing into silence as a way of
arguing / avoiding arguments ?
o Will your child be brought up to think it's normal for couples to
argue in this manner ?
o It's not only your husband's safety that's important but that of the
people around him ( he could hit others in the car if he is not
belted up and you have anything other than a simple head-on
collision ).
o If he is a wage provider then you also have to look at it from the
angle of the loss of earnings if he kicks the bucket.
o Also it isn't very pleasant for a child to be brought up fatherless !
o What happens if he doesn't die, but is crippled, and as such you
have to look after him for the rest of his life.
o Does the fact that he is not wearing a seatbelt invalidate you
insurance?
o There are ( pathetic ) arguments in favour of not wearing seatbelts,
such as what happens if you trapped inside a car after crash then
the seatbelt could hinder the escape ( or being cut out of the car
), but if the crash was severe enough to trap you inside a car in
the first place then in all certainty it was severe enough to bounce
you around the car enough to give you injuries, and in any case
emergency personnel have the power tools available nowadays to cut
anybody out of car very quickly.
o Since the mandatory wearing of seatbelts has been introduced in
Great Britain ( where I live for my sins ) the road traffic accident
rate and severity has been cut dramatically.
Back to my original suggestion, to avoid some of the nastyness then if
you are a two car family you could always put the child in one car and
drive that, and insist that your hudband drives the other. Of course
you would have also insist that he drives behind you ( because, in
general unfurtunately males drive faster ( and more wrecklessly and
aggressively ) than their better �'s ( I hate people who generalize
:-) )) on the excuse that if you break down he will be there to help.
As you can see I have strong thoughts about this topic. I hope this
hasn't ruffled any feathers, Sorry if I have.
Cheers
Steven
|
320.15 | differences | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Wed Sep 23 1992 08:58 | 39 |
| This is just a personal observation but..
I find that in general in the US wearing of a seatbelt seems to be
regarded as personal choice (along with wearing a helmet using a
motorcycle). I'm not sure I understand this attitude - I guess it
depends on where you grew up. When we were quite young there was this
ad campaign to buckle up - the billboard caption read "are you being
stupid?" For the longest time, when dad would pull the car out of the
driveway, mom would ask us "anybody stupid back there?" It got to be a
family ritual.
I do believe, Cheryl, that buckling up is law in Canada too - as I
recall, Quebec just passed a law that the DRIVER can loose points if
ANY of his passengers are not belted.
Actually, I am not sure of the exact legislations in the various
provinces, since we are religous belters - I feel naked and in great
danger when I even move the car without mine on.
2 years ago we visited my husband's grandmother in Maine. One day he
suggested I take Gram along for the ride on a quick errand I was
running. She got in the car and was waiting for me to move. I showed
her were the belt was (most if not all Canadian cars have one belt - a
combination lap and shoulder) and the "crusty old dame" said "I don't
need one - I've never used one before". I, a very polite person with
all my in-laws declared "the car isn't moving until everyone is
belted in" She laughed and gave in........
I too have been in a bad accident - the belt was certainly a helpful
safety feature - saved me from being thrown across the driver when we
got broadsided. Car: demolished. passengers: me, a small bruise on my
shoulder. the driver: she'd had to run out of the car to get something
during the journey and had forgotten to belt up again, she had a much
larger bruise than I, but since the car hit us on my side, I would have
suffered more had I not belted.
Perhaps you can give your husband the idea that it's not so much
himself he should worry about, but consider his loved ones and how they
would feel should he be severely injured or killed in and accident as a
result of not using a seat belt. You can be very zen about death or
multilation yourself, but you don't live in a vaccuum - what are those
around you going to feel?
Monica
|
320.16 | | KAHALA::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Fri Sep 25 1992 10:06 | 28 |
| The day that the seatbelts are made more comfortable and convenient for
shorter people like myself, then I MIGHT wear them. For now, I absolutely
refuse to wear a seatbelt - children or no. I find them uncomfortable,
and absolutely worthless. If I am in an accident, then I may or may not
be hurt.
I don't believe the government has any right to force me to wear a seatbelt,
and will fight to the hilt their desire to do so.
The passive belts are even more uncomfortable than the regular. Would you
like to have to duck your head (or feel you should) when that stupid thing
is moving (when the door is opened or closed). And who has to fix the
unit when it breaks (much activity to a moving part makes it tend to wear
out). I am in favor of airbags and the like. These are more acceptable to
myself than seatbelts.
We allow car companies to make cars smaller and thinner, and we then blame
ourselves for higher insurance. The insurance company price gouging is what
is raising our rates, not other factors. Look at that one company that was
planning on using the Florida hurricane to get rates increased across the
country - this while the executives make in the hundreds of thousands of
dollars in salaries (each!).
Do yourself and your husband a favor - don't nag him. If he decides to
wear the belt then fine. But, if he doesn't then that is his right. You
will only cause hassles if you keep nagging.
Ed..
|
320.17 | | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Fri Sep 25 1992 10:22 | 10 |
| >And who has to fix the unit when it breaks (much activity to a moving
>part makes it tend to wear out).
I don't know about other car makers, but Infiniti warrants them for the
life of the vehicle.
I hate mousebelts too, give me a good 3-point harness with or without
airbag.
Bob
|
320.18 | Moderator request | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Fri Sep 25 1992 10:36 | 10 |
| The topic for this discussion is concerns about family members who will
not wear a seat belt, how to convince them to do so, consequences for
other members of the family, etc. Except as they directly relate to that
topic, discussions about seat belts in general, people who weren't injured
because they were wearing them, why we won't wear them ourselves, etc., are
not particularly relevant to this conference.
Thank you.
-Neil Faiman, PARENTING co-moderator
|
320.19 | The rules are different! | CSC32::L_WHITMORE | | Sat Sep 26 1992 20:04 | 36 |
| Thanks everyone for your responses. Perhaps I should have entered this
in a different conference (soapbox?!!!!) But, I didn't intend for it to
become a discussion of the pros and cons of seatbelts! Although I did
ask how to get my husband (Jerry) to wear one, it'll be difficult to
change his opinion, so mostly I'm needing ideas on how to explain to my
son why daddy doesn't have to wear one. And as another noter pointed
out, it's not just the seatelt issue, but any issue that we may not
necessarily agree on (such as smoking). How do we come across as being
consistent in the "rules" when one of us bends the rules for ourselves.
Jerry and I both agree that all children need to be buckled in, but
disagree when it comes to adults. Anyway, I don't want to say anything
that might make Jerry look "bad" - saying "some adults do not do the
right thing" doesn't sound quite right to me. .10 and .11 are probably
right - once Matthew is older he'll probably start bugging his dad to
buckle-up! It's just that I know someday he'll question why the
rules do not apply to some people, only to others. Maybe I'll take
Kristen's suggestion and just let Jerry explain that one himself!
also, re .14 - you made some good points there that I had not thought
of before (insurance, safety of other passengers). I will probably
mention these to Jerry when the topic comes up again. We don't argue
about this, or anything else for that matter, in front of Matthew.
The few "conversations" we've had about this since Matt was born have
looked like this:
me: Would you please buckle your seat belt?
Jerry: (nothing)
And I'll drop the subject! So I doubt if Matthew
is picking up any clues on "how normal couples argue"! :^)
so - sorry about rambling. Does this clarify (clearer than mud!) what
I was looking for? Bottomline is - how do you explain to kids that the
rules are different for adults vs. children.
|
320.20 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Mon Sep 28 1992 10:55 | 31 |
| Sounds like you should ignore all the side issues and simply say to your
husband that when the question is asked, as it undoubtedly will one day,
you will leave it entirely to him to explain why he doesn't wear it but
his son must.
> me: Would you please buckle your seat belt?
> Jerry: (nothing)
>
> And I'll drop the subject! So I doubt if Matthew
> is picking up any clues on "how normal couples argue"! :^)
This kind of discussion does not tell your husband what your own concerns
are and unless you tell him your concerns ... ie his safety and your desire
to be consistent with your son, then any discussion with potential
disagreements will always be the same. Remember that you cannot make
your husband do anything ... all you can do is set up situations that
might make him want to change, without being accusative.
For example, in wanting him to buckle his seatbelt ... rather than say
"You'll probably kill yourself if you don't wear a seatbelt", say
something like, "I'm terrified of being a widow and raising a son
alone if you get killed in accident because you didn't wear a seat
belt".
> I was looking for? Bottomline is - how do you explain to kids that the
> rules are different for adults vs. children.
Bottom line is that the rules really are NOT significantly different for
adults and children, and shouldn't be!
Stuart
|
320.21 | rules are different for adults | FSOA::DJANCAITIS | to risk is to live | Mon Sep 28 1992 12:14 | 20 |
|
> I was looking for? Bottomline is - how do you explain to kids that the
> rules are different for adults vs. children.
>> Bottom line is that the rules really are NOT significantly different for
>> adults and children, and shouldn't be!
I have to disagree on this one, at least as it pertains to seatbelts. The
"rules" on seatbelts ARE differernt for adults and children, even though some
of us might wish the weren't !!
With my son (now going on 8) anytime we were in a car and he asked me why
someone was not belted, I simply explained the LAW - children under the age of
12 (in Massachusetts, at least) HAVE to be seat-belted or I/driver can get in
trouble with the police - ADULTS have a CHOICE of whether or not to wear a
seatbelt and some adults CHOOSE not to wear one.
In our family, Matt knows we ALL wear a belt and there's been no argument.
But he does understand that for the adults, it's because we WANT to, whereas
with him, he HAS to.
|
320.22 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Mon Sep 28 1992 13:12 | 10 |
| You missed my meaning here ...
Yes, the law makes a difference, but the rules YOU CHOOSE TO LIVE BY
as a family should be essentially the same, adult or child.
Laws or not, we have family rules such as we don't ride without
seatbelts, we don't eat sloppy foods in carpeted rooms, we try to
avoid swear words and so on.
Stuart
|
320.23 | Kid-rules, Adult-Rules. I don't want grape soda! | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Tue Dec 15 1992 16:01 | 67 |
| Kinda late but .....
Are you saying that YOU expect to live by the same rules as a 3-year
old?? What time do you go to bed?? Most parents go to bed hours after
their children - why is that different?? How come it's okay for
Mom/Dad to have a beer, but Johnny can't? Why can you drive, and they
can't? Why do I have to go to work all day, and it's okay for them to
sit around and watch cartoons or play?? How come, if they're tired,
they can go to sleep whenever they want, and their needs will be met,
but if I'M tired, I have to make sure the family's needs are met before
I can take that much-needed rest? How come they can eat 2 pounds of
cotton candy and it makes me sick to my stomach? Why can I go on the
big roller coaster and they can't? How come when Mommy/Daddy get
REALLY mad, it's okay to yell or maybe even swear, but it's NEVER okay
for kids?? Why is it okay for me to disagree with the clerk at the
store, but if THEY speak up to an adult, it's "talking back"?
Come on, folks, the rules AREN'T the same, never have been, and never
WILL be!! You're only fooling yourself if you think they are! Your
kids sure know the difference! They know if you're going outside Mom
and Dad don't need to wear hats and gloves and snowpants and boots -
but THEY do!
The fact is, adults and children are not the same, are not capable of
the same levels of reasoning, decision-making, and responsibility, and
should not be treated that way. Yes, we all know that Coffee is bad
for us - but how many still drink it? Now, of you, would you let your
kids drink it? How about have a beer? Why not - it might relax them
too!
I'm sorry, but in my house, there are rules for the adults, and rules
for the kids, and in this instance, the answer is quite simply that
Daddy does not want to wear a seatbelt, there is no law that requires
Daddy to wear one, and that's HIS decision. And when they're older
they can make THEIR decision too. Take the opportunity to explain the
pros for wearing a seatbelt, so that hopefully you can influence your
child to WANT to wear one, and stop trying to find an excuse for Dad.
He's an adult. Yes, sometimes I swear. My kids know better than to
swear EVER! There should be a clear line between adults and children,
and adults obviously have more choices.
Your kids don't tell you when it's time to go to bed .... the rules
aren't the same! You work to support the household and to provide for
them. There should be a type of "caste" system (not meant
disrespectfully), where the dependents have less rights/privileges than
those who provide everything. And the providers should have more
freedom of choice.
What ever happened to "Not as long as you live under MY roof!"?
I've always liked the catch-all answer .... "Because I'm the Mommy,
THAT'S why!" Stop arguing with your kids, start earning their respect,
and try to teach them that there IS a difference between adults and
children - maybe, just maybe, they'd rather not have all the pressures
of an adult world!
People are given as much as they can deal with - a three year old can
only stack blocks, because stacking blocks is ALL the stress that a
3-year old knows how to deal with. They don't know how to deal with it
when they try to empty the trash and it dumps all over the floor.
They're kid-people, they should have kid-rules.
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want my mom coming in the
bathroom to make sure I got all the shampoo out of my hair now ....
|
320.24 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Tue Dec 15 1992 17:01 | 39 |
| You missed the point here Patty ...
Yes, there are rules that are different for adults as opposed to
children, but your standards in making those rules MUST BE CONSISTENT.
For example ... we have a rule "no sloppy foods in carpeted areas of
the house" ... why ... because I hate steam cleaning carpets and am
not rich enough to either afford new carpets or have them
professionally cleaned. Now, the major culprits on this are the kids
no doubt ... but I've dropped chocolate ice cream ... i've lost tomato
sauce onto the floor ... just because I'm an adult doesn't mean I'm
immune from slopping stuff. So the rule applies to us all.
No alcohol for the kids ... easy ... a) a child's body is smaller
so cannot take much alcohol to make them ill, b) drinking alcohol
has been shown to require maturity that normally comes with age
(not always unfortunately but that's another matter). The law
makes it both easy and difficult by defining a drinking age.
No driving ... easy ... driving requires judgement skills that again
normally comes with maturity.
Now back to seatbelts ... the standard here is that in an accident
people in a car, child or adult, run a grater risk of physical injury
from a car crash without seatbelts. Being an adult is not an advantage
here. How do you explain to your child that if you have an accident
the child's seatbelt may save his life and at the same time say that
it's OK if daddy dies because he isn't ?
Yes, there are ADULT (note ... not PARENT) rules that are distinct from
CHILD rules ... and in each case where the rules are different, it is
because there is some factor such as maturity, or physical ability
that makes the distinction. But a lot of rules really cannot have
a logical distinction why the adult and child rule is different ...
and these are the ones that should be applied universally ... like
the seat belt rule.
Stuart
|
320.25 | You may be DEAD right! | MR4DEC::LTRIPP | | Fri Jan 15 1993 12:18 | 24 |
| This is late but here's my two cents worth....
I am an EMT, I HAVE seen the death and destruction that a lack of seat
belts has caused. I am sitting here with lunch in front of me, and the
mere reflection of what I have seen has a definiite impact on my
appetite!
My husband (also and EMT/firefighter/rescue worker) has seen probably
more death and destruction than I. He used to be rather casual about
wearing his seatbelt. The AJ started asking, no more like ordering
him, "dad WHERE IS your seatbelt?" He now wears in just about all the
time. I no longer have some of the same arguments as the basenoter,
and ironically I received almost the same answer (or lack of). I too
tried the "I don't want you to die and leave me to raise this child
alone" routine. What *I* said seem to no penetrate his thick skull,
but what AJ said made a definite, immediate impact on him.
Oh my husband sent along a rather graphic comment for those who don't
wear seatbelts, because it might waste time getting out in a accident.
His comment was "that's fine, it will make it easier for the MEDICAL
EXAMINER to get the DEAD BODY out of the vehicle at the accident scene!
Unfortunately from what we've both seen, it's a rather accurate observation!
Lyn
|
320.26 | Adult Pays | SALEM::GILMAN | | Mon Jan 18 1993 11:56 | 8 |
| Another factor which makes a difference between adult and kid rules is
that in almost every instance the ADULT is either doing the work to
repair the damage caused by the rule infraction OR the ADULT is paying
another adult to have the damage fixed. The point is that since the
adult pays for the fix of the problem the rules can be different
between adult and child.
Jeff
|
320.27 | Wear your seatbelts... | STAR::AWHITNEY | | Mon Aug 23 1993 16:14 | 19 |
| Here's one for your husband --
I was just a few cars behind a head on collision on RT 111 in Hudson,
NH on friday. 3 people were involved. There was a lady, her 3 year
old son in one car and a man about 40 in the other car. The lady
for some unknown reason glided over the yellow line and the hit head
on. The boy was in a car seat, the man had his seatbelt on (his car
was also equiped with an air bag), the mom didn't have her seatbelt on.
The two with the seatbelts on lived (they had to go through some
surgery but they are stable now)...The mom died upon arrival at the
hospital.
Just a reminder that you really should wear your seatbelt. I posted
this in another file and I don't want to hear 'You can't tell me what
to do" - I'm not telling you that you have to wear your seatbelts.
This experience gave me a heads up - I wanted to pass that along.
BTW - It was 10:00am in the morning - who would think?
|
320.28 | it's a sad scenairo | SAMDHI::TRIPP | | Mon Aug 23 1993 16:49 | 11 |
| What you just described almost sounds like a very typical "mom"
syndrome type of accident. You will probably read later that the child
dropped a toy, food or bottle on the floor and mom was bending over to
retrieve it, and just swayed a little too far to the left.
Unfortunately it's a very commom scenario, one I've seen the end
results a little too often.
The whole story really gets to me in a big way, the poor child growing
up not knowing his mother. I keep asking myself why?
Lyn
|
320.29 | Thank God for seatbelts | GVA05::BETTELS | Cheryl, DTN 821-4022, Management Systems Research | Tue Aug 24 1993 21:04 | 10 |
| YEsterday, I totalled our car. Yup. Markus was with me in the front
seat, the side where the guy drove into me. We were both wearing seat
belts, thank God, because with the speed that guy hit me, Markus would
have been dead now. I got a VERY minor bvruise on my leg (no spot,
just sore) and I can't imagine where that leg has been.
Guess we're a one car family now. Should save on car expenses :-) (Hey
wait a minute, wasn't the cheap living in another note ? :-)
Cheryl
|
320.30 | | 38822::JENNISON | John 3:16 - Your life depends on it! | Wed Aug 25 1993 09:30 | 4 |
|
And Thank God you're both ok!
Karen
|
320.31 | oh gosh! | KAOFS::M_BARNEY | Dance with a Moonlit Knight | Wed Aug 25 1993 09:45 | 9 |
| Good Grief!
Its a sort of reminder that that kind of thing can happen to anybody,
and ALWAYS when you least expect it!
How's Markus?
I remember when I was the passenger in such an accident - I was in
shock for 1/2 a day!
Monica
I'm so glad you're both okay!
|
320.32 | | SAMDHI::TRIPP | | Wed Aug 25 1993 11:08 | 12 |
| I second the thought of Thank God you are both all right. No matter
how old you are, you may keep reliving the nightmare of the accident
itself.
I guess now you have to turn it around to a positive note....
Now you can go shopping for a nice new car!
So glad neither one of you were hurt more seriously, thank heavens you
had your seatbelts on!
Lyn
|
320.33 | Save $$$$ smash car | GVA05::BETTELS | Cheryl, DTN 821-4022, Management Systems Research | Wed Aug 25 1993 13:13 | 20 |
| Markus seemed to have no problems whatsoever. And thank you all for
your thoughts. I have to pass that corner all the time and can see
very well how dangerous it is. The principle road bends to the right
but first makes a little hook to the left. There is a building on my
right as I was driving so you can't see well but I was going very
slowly and looked before going straight (the equivalent of a left
turn). This guy came literally out of nowhere and, because it was
raining and he was going too fast, he couldn't stop. Markus didn't see
him either (although I don't know how much that is supporting Maman :-)
REgarding the bright side, well, it isn't a new car. This is a good
excuse to try living with one car again and cutting some of our costs,
now that I am not working. We'll look into a new car if I get a job
:-) I get the car one day a week for shopping and Jurgen takes the
train that day. Otherwise I go by bike.
Thanks again to all of you!
Cheryl
|
320.34 | He's wearing his seatbelt!!!! | CSC32::L_WHITMORE | | Mon Mar 28 1994 23:46 | 11 |
| I wanted to write an update to this note. I am the basenoter who
couldn;t get her husband to wear a seatbelt! Well - he does now!
I was floored the other day when we all went for a drive in
Daddy's new truck and Matthew (3 1/2) said "Daddy, wear your seat
belt. It's a safety rule." and he did!! Someone in this string
had said that this might happen but I am still amazed. Matthew
watches Barney and loves to tell everyone all about the safety
rules. I am so glad his father listens to him!
Lila
|
320.35 | I wish my husband would! | NAPIER::HEALEY | M&ES, MRO4, 297-2426 | Tue Mar 29 1994 09:04 | 15 |
|
re: <<< Note 320.34 by CSC32::L_WHITMORE >>>
-< He's wearing his seatbelt!!!! >-
Good job! Now if only I can get my husband to wear his. He
only wears it if my driving makes him nervous or if the
weather is bad. He'll also put if on if I ask him but I
know that when I'm not in the car, he goes without most of
the time. Lauren is too young to notice now (at not quite
4 months of age), but eventually, she will notice.
Karen
|
320.36 | Seatbelts | SALEM::GILMAN | | Mon Apr 04 1994 11:43 | 17 |
| Some drivers maintain that not wearing a seatbelt is a matter which
effects only them. If there are passengers in the car (or even if
there aren't) the drivers ability to control the vehicle is improved
by wearing a belt since it keeps the driver behind the wheel under
bumpy or accident contitions. If the driver has been thrown over to
the passengers side it would be 'difficult' for him to control the
vehicle. Also, the other passengers can be injured by his hurtling
body.
This doesn't even address the cost to society for caring for a more
severely injured person because the person wasn't wearing a belt.
It also doesn't address the effect on the hurt/killed persons family
and friends.
Its NOT strictly a matter that affects the only the person making the
choice of not wearing a seatbelt.
|
320.37 | congrats to hubby for buckling up! | LEDS::TRIPP | | Tue Apr 19 1994 17:45 | 22 |
| A little over a month ago we bought a new car with "passive" seatbelts.
I have a couple women friends, and I will frequently pick them up to do
coffee of an errand. Both of these women are very upfront about
"hating" seatbelts, but really have no choice with these thing, they
loosen and tighten up when the door is opened and closed.
Now I know the SECRET! yes there is a latch, NO you don't actually have
to have it across you all the time, but I'll be D**NED If I'm going to
be the one to say "OK you don't have to wear one, let me disconnect it
for you" In my NEXT LIFE maybe! I have an airbag on my side, I still
do the passive and the lap belt, no matter how far I'm going!
My husband doesn't complain about the seatbelt, but frequenlty needs to
be reminded that he still has to buckle the lap belt. Just a gentle
reminder that he forgot, not a big deal for any of us! Of course it is
now a MA state law that ALL people MUST buckle up!
Congratulations to you and hubby for voluntarily buckling up, this is
the kind of business I really DON'T WANT!
Lyn
(The EMT and Mom!)
|