T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
165.1 | On the shoes | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Thu Jun 11 1992 04:41 | 10 |
| Many Europeans do not wear shoes in their homes. The polite solution that I
have often seen is that the hostess has a number of pairs of slip ons in
different sizes and guests are asked matter of factly to put a pair on. I
always have to wear shoes due to foot problems but all of my boys' friends
take off their shoes and put on a pair of slippers when they come into the
house.
Can't help with the hand washing ...
ccb
|
165.2 | they are hardier than we think | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Laura | Thu Jun 11 1992 08:27 | 46 |
| When I was pregnant (my first and so far, only) I read a magazine
column that talked about how mothers change between the first,
second and third child.
When the first baby drops its pacifier, Mom washes and sterilizes it.
When the second baby drops its pacifier, Mom rinses it off and gives it
back to baby.
When the third baby drops its pacifier, Mom wipes it with her hand and
gives it back.
With the birth of my daughter, I decided to bypass "first baby" and
"second baby" and go directly to "third baby". I decided that with all
the pressure of a full-time job, long commute, and assisting my husband
in his business, I didn't need the added pressure of being extra
sanitary.
I reasoned that in large families, the third and subsequent children
are no more likely to get sick than only children. I don't think that
a small amount of dirt on the floor or on our hands will affect them if
they are already basically healthy.
We have a dog and wear our shoes in the house. The kitchen floor gets
the dirtiest; I sweep it 2 or 3 times a week and wash it 1 or 2 times.
I kept it somewhat cleaner when the baby started crawling and returned
to my usual schedule when she started walking. I like the policy of no
shoes in the house, but my husband doesn't agree. With all the other
important things to argue about, I let this one go.
All this having been said, I can understand your feelings about washing
your hands before the baby sucks on them. Perhaps if you explain that
you don't want the baby sucking on dirty hands, she will understand. If
you present it more generally as "I don't want you to touch or pick up
the baby with dirty hands", she may understandably resist.
As for the tossing in the air, the risk to the child (aside from being
dropped - a very serious concern) is virtually nill unless it is
excessively rough. Bumping the child up and down on your knee (while
seated) and even tossing up about 3 inches, is not going to hurt the
child. Just be sure she is sober, watches carefully, and keeps both
hands near or on the baby at all times.
Perhaps you are being overprotective? I would seriously consider this.
L
|
165.3 | | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Thu Jun 11 1992 09:03 | 5 |
| It is summertime -- are you going to let your child go outside?
There's an awful lot of dirt in the world.
-Neil
|
165.4 | it's your baby...you decide | STUDIO::POIRIER | | Thu Jun 11 1992 10:21 | 26 |
| When we brought Shannon home, we stocked up on antibacterial soap and
face masks! We were extremely over protective because of Shannon's
susceptability (she was born at 26 weeks and spent 3 months in the
hospital). It was an accepted practice that all guests wash their
hands upon arrival! Anyone with cold-like symptoms were not allowed to
touch her. Dad and I wore masks if we thought we were catching a cold.
Now, after more than a year, people automatically wash their hands
and I don't stop them. When she started crawling, we stopped wearing
shoes that we wear outside in the house. Friends who frequent the
house take their shoes off automatically even though I never asked. I
figure what the heck? Keeps my need to wash the floor down to 2-3
times a week rather than every day!
I know kids will get dirty and "eat a peck of dirt before they die",
but germs are different!
If Shannon didn't have the susceptibility she had, I still think I
would have mandated hand washing...not for dirt, but for those nasty
invisible germs!
my .02
-beth
|
165.5 | talk to her | SAHQ::HERNDON | Kristen, SOR, 385-2683 | Thu Jun 11 1992 10:23 | 21 |
|
Sounds like YOU need to deal with your sister-in-law and not
your husband.
I went through a traumatic weekend last week with my in-laws.
I whined to my hubby to talk to his mom and he finally told me, YOU
have the problem, YOU deal with it. I decided to wait until
I cooled down before I talked to her...
Avoiding your sister-in-law won't solve the problem, just delay
the confrontation.
Who knows, maybe she'll be understanding about it. I hope
my mother-in-law is...8*)
Kristen
|
165.6 | Relax..... | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Just another tricky day | Thu Jun 11 1992 10:38 | 20 |
| When my daughter was born (she's now 2.5), I was not over protective of
her. The only thing I worried about was, children coming to vist who
had colds. But as far as people holding her, that was not a problem.
Babies can't be clean and smell good 24 hours a day, they do more
damage to themselves with spitting up all over themselves than any
adult with a little dirt under their nails can do. A far as the
ear infection goes, babies or anyone for that matter cannot catch
them, they are a viral infection. And most children have at least 3 ear
infections before the age of two. My advice: I realize you are a 1st
time parent and are very protective of your little bundle of joy, relax
a bit and have faith in those who hold her. I'm sure the things you
explained in your note are not done intentionally. You will probably
look back on this time when baby is older and say," I can't beleive I
was so over protective". Baby's are not as fragile as people tend to
think. Wait till your child is older and walking, the bumps and bruises
and dirt on them is almost a 24 hr aday thing!
Sorry to be so long winded
Sandy
|
165.7 | the carpets are more vulnerable :) | TLE::RANDALL | liberal feminist redneck pacifist | Thu Jun 11 1992 10:43 | 4 |
| We don't wear shoes in the house, but it's to protect the carpets,
not the kids . . .
--bonnie
|
165.8 | | GOOEY::ROLLMAN | | Thu Jun 11 1992 10:52 | 16 |
|
It sounds like it isn't really the hand-washing that's bothering you, but your
s-i-l's attitude and the way she tends to just grab the baby from you. I think
you need to talk to her about this. She probably has no idea she's making
you feel territorial. Tell her so. Decide what you want (call before coming to
visit? washes her hands before playing with the baby? do not let the baby
suck on her finger?) and tell her directly. Do this when the baby is not there
to argue over.
You *are* the mother and you have the right to set the rules for your child;
don't forget your husband has the same right.
*BUT*, a little dirt and germs isn't going to hurt. Elise kisses the dogs,
eats dirt and leaves and stuff off the floor, and shares her crackers with the
dogs if we don't stop her. She's healthy as a horse.
|
165.9 | | AKO452::CCHEN | | Thu Jun 11 1992 11:13 | 24 |
|
I have told my sister-in-law to take off her shoes when I have a good
excuse; eg., right after I have the carpet washed, when it was
snowing out. I have also said couple times like "please take off
your shoes, I heard there were ticks by the walkways in the front". But
sometimes she says "oh my shoes are clean". And that's usually where
the conversation ends.
By the way, in the daycare (a family daycare), nobody wears the shoes
in the house. The daycare provider seems to wash her floor every
morning before everybody arrive. Sometimes when I get there early,
she is just finishing washing the kitchen floor.
What can I say to make her understand that that's what I want in MY
house, and I don't want to keep reminding her that? She is little
bit older than us, not married, no kids. She likes to tell us what to
do with our marriage, our jobs, our apartment, and so on. She and
I have had a nice, friendly relationship even though we do not enjoy
each other's company. I don't want the relationship to turn ugly, so
I have been trying not to be rude. I don't mind if she never comes to
visit us again, but I don't want her to hate me, thinking I am the one
who is not letting her visit her brother and her niece. So what do you
think, folks? Any comment is appreciated.
|
165.10 | germs versus affection | MR4DEC::SPERA | | Thu Jun 11 1992 12:37 | 10 |
| It is always difficult to allow other people and their different ways
to come near our children.
I have to balance what I perceive as the danger with what I feel is the
value to my child of knowing the affection of other adults, especially
those family members who will always play a role in my child's life. I
usually find myself deciding in favor of letting the relationship grow
and maybe washing the baby's hands afterwards.
|
165.11 | critters are protien enriched!!! really!!! | CSC32::L_MEIER | | Thu Jun 11 1992 15:14 | 44 |
| Hi,
Just my two cents worth:
To set the stage the first visit is always the easiest but afterwards
you can still be the one to say how you would like your child handled.
My daughter, now 11 became neutropenic (sp?) and it was really VERY
uncomfortable for me to say anything about hand washing when you come
in. Especially in the beginning. It was much easier to explain the
situation before they were allowed to visit but when her tutor came
over the first time, I was very nervous about asking her to wash her
hands, she was more interested in running over to kiss and hug etc...
When I did ask, she said "Oh I just finished taking a shower..." and
from what I knew (or more precicely didn't know) about germs, that
wasn't good enough for me. My other daughter saved me by blurting out
that she had to wash anyway, so the tutor submitted. It took me along
time to sit down and figure out how to handle this in the future but
the only answer I found was that it had to be said! regardless!!
I am more comfortable with it now and I'm sure you will relax a bit
when you find yourself in this situation (the differences in the people
handling your child) throughout your many happy years with your child.
One suggestion I might make is to make a silly sign to put on the door
for all to see that depicts what you see in your mind. Like a baby
sucking on fingers and all those little germie critters running around
around blowing their noses because they are cold germs. This may sound
silly but I would definitely take the focus off the one person visiting
and make it less personal.
I have two girls and found that dirt doesn't hurt them, the germs that
people carry will be around all their lives, they will abuse their
bodies more than any adult will, and it's even good for them to be
exposed to germs at a young age to build their antibodies up slowly.
If you take them out of the house into any enclosed building (even the
doctors office **the worse**) they will be just as exposed to germs.
They need to build up their own defense systems and if your nursing at
all, now is the best time to do that, when they are getting some
defense from you.
It's so hard to write just a little....
Lori
|
165.12 | Wear socks... | NEWPRT::NEWELL_JO | Latine loqui coactus sum | Thu Jun 11 1992 18:57 | 7 |
| Just an aside...taking your shoes off is fine if that's what
you want to do, but keep your socks on. The oils from your
feet will not only possibly spread germs (or maybe athletes foot :^)
but the oils cause your carpet to wear out sooner by attracting
dirt faster. At least that's what the carpet cleaner told me.
Jodi-
|
165.13 | separate the issues | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Laura | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:52 | 17 |
| It sounds like you need to sort out the house rules and the baby rules.
If you don't want shoes in the house to keep the carpets clean, then
that's a separate issue from keeping dirt or insects away from baby.
Guests will take your request more readily if you say that it is simply
your preference and leave the baby out of it.
By the way, people get ticks on their clothing (not leather shoes) by
walking through brushy areas, particularly where there are deer. I
don't think you'll get ticks in the driveway unless your bushes hang
over really far.
We have woods near our house, and our dog frequently goes there. We
also sometimes walk there. So far, no ticks. They are pretty obvious,
by the way.
L
|
165.14 | | SAHQ::HERNDON | Kristen, SOR, 385-2683 | Fri Jun 12 1992 15:20 | 6 |
| RE .13
i agree...if you don't want the shoes in the house, SAY THAT!
rather than use other excuses to get her to take her shoes off.
|
165.15 | | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Tue Jun 16 1992 11:11 | 22 |
| It sounds to me (only my opinion) that your problem is with your relationship
with your sister-in-law and is manifesting itself in how you perceive her
with your baby. You mentioned many other things, like her telling you how to
live your marriage, etc. so I think you have to sit down and say to yourself,
"Now exactly what must I try to change in this relationship to make it possible
for us to enjoy each other or is this impossible to do?" This may involve
making a list, sorting out real issues apart from "things you can live with" and
recognising that there are things that are impossible for you to change.
Discuss it with your husband, always with the idea in the back of your mind that
you really want to improve the relationship. Then discuss it (hopefully
together) with your sister-in-law. I think if you tell her how YOU fell and
how things that might not affect her affect YOU, she will hopefully not take it
as a criticism of her but as an honest effort to effect real change. You
shouldn't use euphemisms or excuses. It is very important to verbalise your
feelings and make sure she understands that these are things that really
bother you.
Be ready for compromise. You might have to give way on some minor points to
score on the major ones. Good Luck!
Cheryl
|