T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
148.1 | twin babies of different mothers? | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Fri Jun 05 1992 10:13 | 34 |
|
I gained 27 pounds and did not gain any weight for the last 8 weeks
(but then I was two weeks over). Did I eat a lot of food? You bet,
night and day, I'd wake up to have a sandwich and then go back to bed
for more sleep. The last 6 weeks all I could do was eat and yet I did
not gain weight but that was because the baby gained it all.
He, like yours, was a big baby at 9.11 and his head circumference
was 15 inches, I managed to deliver him vaginally but only after 2 1/2
hours of hard pushing on pit. (I was induced throughout and I was also
in pretty bad shape for the next few days).
They tell me that second babies *usually* weigh more than first
babies (the theory is that your body is now more efficient at making
babies). oh joy.
As there seems to be nothing you can do about the weight, the best
you can do is be prepared in the event that you will need another
C-section (in my case, if another baby is even bigger the chances of a
C-section are very high)
As far as your weight gain, everyone is so very different. As long
as you are being monitored by your Doctor and as long as you are truly
eating (you're not holding back because you might gain 42 pounds again
are you?) there is not too much to worry about. If you have concerns,
there are nutritionists that work with pregnant women and there is also
the reference book What to eat while you are expecting (it's in the
pregnant woman's bibles section of the bookstore)
Good luck, seeing as our babies are so close in size, I'll be
*very* interested to hear how things turn out.
Wendy
|
148.2 | Oh, how I want a banana split! | GLDOA::LAETZ | | Fri Jun 05 1992 10:26 | 18 |
| Wendy:
No, I am not skimping on foods so that I do not gain excessive weight,
but I am watching it more than the first time, and do more exercise
(walking) in hopes of keeping the fat down.
I will do anything to accomplish a 7-8 pound baby this time. I was
hoping to gain 20-25 pounds like the doctor suggested, but it looks
like my trend is going above that already.
Glad to hear there is someone else out there that had a MEGA-baby.
Kristen looked like she had come down from the toddler-care area of the
hospital by accident! But, I have to admit that she was very easy to
handle, and a very HEALTHY baby!
I just want to have vaginal if possible . . .
Jolene
|
148.3 | | DYNOSR::CHANG | Little dragons' mommy | Fri Jun 05 1992 10:56 | 8 |
| Well, I do have a much smaller second baby. My son was 8.14 at birth.
My daughter was only 7. Both preganacies I gained 40 pounds. I don't
think I ate a lot both times, somehow I still gained weight. However,
I am happy to report that both times I got back to my pre-preganacy
weight in 3 months. I haven't gained a single pound so far due to
preganacies.
Wendy
|
148.4 | | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Just another tricky day | Fri Jun 05 1992 11:12 | 7 |
| I gained 36 pounds with my 1st pregnancy. I was told I would have at
least a 9+ pounder. She was 8lbs. I don't beleive eating more or less
has anything to do with your baby's weight. My sister-in-law gained 46
with her daughter and ate as much as I and her baby was smaller than
mine 7lbs 14 oz.
Sandy
|
148.5 | what one book had to say | BSLOPE::BOURQUARD | Deb | Fri Jun 05 1992 11:16 | 5 |
| I haven't had my baby yet, so I can't contribute my personal experience, but...
one thing that I read implied that if you gain a lot of weight eating primarily
junk food, then you, not the baby, is gaining the weight.
|
148.6 | Hoping for more good news . . . | GLDOA::LAETZ | | Fri Jun 05 1992 12:13 | 15 |
| Thanks for all the replies!
I am 5'2", and normally no more than 115 pounds - - thus the concern
for the size of baby. 40+ pounds for me was EXCESSIVE weight gain! It
looks like I am not going to do much better this time around! Gosh, I
hope you are right that it does not have anything to do with the size
of your baby.
Deb: the friend that had gained more and had a smaller baby, is she
normally a small person???
Just wondering (and worrying) - as I faithfully eat fruit and veggies
(yuck!!!)
Jolene
|
148.7 | | MIVC::MTAG | | Fri Jun 05 1992 12:15 | 9 |
| Back in my mom's era, weight gain was a no-no... she most she gained
was 18 or so pounds (10 with me) and our birth weights were 9.4, 8.14,
and 8.15. My sister-in-law gained under 20lbs with Thomas and he was
9.11 lbs. I gained between 35-40lbs and Jackie was 8.15 1/2 lbs. So,
my personal opinion is that no, weight gain does not have a whole lot
to do with birth weight. I think it has more to do with genetics.
Mary
|
148.8 | | CUPMK::PHILBROOK | Customer Publications Consulting | Fri Jun 05 1992 17:48 | 6 |
| My wife is just about to enter her 2nd trimester and has gained 20 lbs.
already. She's not chowing down on junk food and she's really not eating
any more than normal. I'm starting to wonder if there's two of them in
there! ;-) I guess we'll find out on 6/23 when we have an ultrasound.
Mike
|
148.9 | My Weight and Small Babies | TUNER::CLEMENT | | Mon Jun 08 1992 10:41 | 8 |
| With my first I gained 26 lbs. and he weighed 5lbs. 10 oz at birth.
I'm now 36 weeks pregnant with twins and I've gained 36 lbs. At the
last ultrasound a couple of weeks ago, a guess weight (at that time)
was that each baby weighed 4 lbs. 11 ozs.
My mother had all small babies, under 6 lbs.
|
148.10 | They keep getting bigger and staying longer... | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Mon Jun 08 1992 10:54 | 7 |
| My example:
I gained 37 pounds with my first who was 4 weeks early and weighed 6#4
I gained 37 pounds with my next who was 12 days late and weighed 9#5.
I dare not have another!
|
148.11 | My experience | CSOA1::ZACK | | Mon Jun 08 1992 12:38 | 10 |
| My Babies.
#1, I gained 52 lbs, she was two weeks late, 7lbs 5 ozs.
#2, I gained 45 lbs, she was born on her due date, 7lbs 15ozs.
I don't think the weight gained by the mother has much to do with the
size of the baby.
Angie.
|
148.12 | My 2 cents | SUEWIT::RUBIN | | Mon Jun 08 1992 13:09 | 11 |
|
I gained 47 lbs with my baby who was born 2 weeks early, and weighed
7 lbs 12 ozs.
I did not eat more than usual, and I never knew why I was gaining so much.
I still have 9 lbs to pre-pregnancy weight, but I'm getting there, slowly
but surely (my baby is 6 months old, now).
---Sue.
|
148.13 | My babies... | SELL1::MACFAWN | Training to be tall and blonde | Mon Jun 08 1992 13:52 | 7 |
| Alyssa, baby #1: gained 27 pounds weighed 7.3, 19.5 inches
Krystin, baby #2: gained 52 pounds weighed 9.0, 21.5 inches
As long as you have a healthy baby, I suppose that's all that really
matters.
Gail
|
148.14 | One more story. | JARETH::CORMAN | | Mon Jun 08 1992 17:00 | 46 |
| I'm trying not to *worry* about weight gain. There's so many other
fun things to worry about, after all!
My story:
Sarah, baby #1: I gained over 40 lbs with her, probably closer
to 45, but I stopped counting in the last few weeks because it
depressed me too much. She weighed 8.4, was 20.5 inches.
(Delivered by emergency C-section after a long labor.)
"Elvis" or "Elvira" :-), baby #2-to-be: this one is to be delivered
by planned C-section on 16-July. I'm at 33 weeks now and thus far
have gained 29 lbs. So I imagine I'll gain around 35 lbs or so, total,
by the delivery date.
With the first baby, I ate, and ate, and ate. I was extremely hungry
all the time. Those 40-45 extra lbs felt very uncomfortable on my 5'2
frame (also normally around 115 or so), although some of the
discomfort was due to swollen feet,
face, hands, and to the baby being so high that my ribs ached, I
couldn't catch my breath, and the indigestion was never-ending.
I carried very high and very big.
This time I've tried to moderate the amount I'm eating, but I can't
tell if it really has mattered. I'm still hungry all the time. I'm as big
and carrying almost as high as before, but the indigestion is
almost nil. (However, the pressure in my middle and pelvis is much
worse. Oh well. And the heat has brought the swollen feet back, alas.)
I don't think the total weight gain is controllable (I still don't
understand how the last generations of women gained 10 or 15 lbs.
per pregnancy; I know it's true but it was sadistic and
unhealthy!) It IS two people gaining, not one, after all.
And the heat, water retention, size of placenta, etc. etc. have
much to do with it.
One last note: Of those 40-45 lbs I gained the first time around,
I lost 25 of them from the delivery and within the first week following
delivery. The swelling and water retention was gone and I could
suddenly see my ankles again! That's what I mean about it not
being under one's control. I lost another 8-10 lbs during
breastfeeding although I still ate a good amount. The remaining
10 or so lbs have stayed with me, but that was due to lack of
regular exercize and a fair amount of fried foods. :-)
-Barbara
|
148.15 | Mine | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Tue Jun 09 1992 04:42 | 13 |
| I gained 8 kg (about 17 lbs) with Dirk who was a tiny under 2.5 kg baby
delivered by C-section. With Markus, I gained 9 kg and he was 3.2 kg. If
you put on too much weight over here, they will send you to a dietician.
One good thing about not putting on weight if you are going to have a
Caesarian is that here at least they will do the "bikini" cut only if you
have not put on more than about 10-11 kg.
Myself, I am medium height (170 cm) but VERY narrow in the hips. My mother had
8 children ranging in size from just over 5 lbs to just over 7 lbs. My
sisters have had children all in the 7-8 lb range.
Cheryl
|
148.16 | | TLE::C_STOCKS | Cheryl Stocks | Tue Jun 09 1992 09:42 | 12 |
| re .15:
Cheryl,
I love reading your notes - your different perspective is very interesting!
I wanted to comment on the C-sections. I had 2 "bikini cut" ones, and
gained right around 35 pounds for each pregnancy. Nothing was ever said
to me about any weight limit for that style of incision - I don't think
it's an issue over here. (Well, that's probably a bit too general - at least
I don't believe it's an issue at the hospital where I had my babies.)
cheryl
|
148.17 | From a Cheryl to a Cheryl | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Tue Jun 09 1992 10:15 | 21 |
| By the way, Cheryl is a very unusual name here. The French pronounce it
like "cherie", a term of endearment you use with your very dearest loved ones.
One time my band director's parents thought he was having an affair with me
because he addressed me all evening as "cherie" and went home and told his wife
who was terribly amused (I knew her well :-)
I guess Europeans are very concerned about weight gain in general and doctors
here expect to have a lot of control over their patients. Also with our
children, the pediatrician will be concerned if babies gain too quickly or
not quickly enough. I know I had to put Markus on a diet when he was two
months old because he was too chubby.
Maybe weight is no longer an issue here either for a C-section but this was
certainly my experience.
My step daughter was severely overweight and lost about 40 kilograms before
she became pregnant. In spite of being overjoyed at her daughter's birth, she
was dismayed at having to get off the weight again. And she is super careful
not to overfeed her daughter.
Cheryl
|
148.18 | I'm scared too! | CLT::4GL::CJOHNSON | Eat, drink and see Jerry! | Tue Jun 09 1992 10:49 | 18 |
|
My mid-wife told me after I delivered my 9lb 15oz 22 1/2 inch boy
(vaginally) that having a big baby could be hereditary. The only
big baby that I knew of was my brother. My mother was sick and
was 85 lbs. and gave birth to a 9lb 6oz baby. I gained 30lbs up
to 40 weeks and was 2 weeks over due. In that 2 week time period
I blew up like a huge water balloon. I thought that I was all water
and was going to have a normal size baby. wrong. Well after I
delivered Nicholas, all of a sudden my father tells me that he
weighed 10lbs as a baby, then my father-in-law says he was a 10lb
baby..It would have been nice to know this before hand so I could
let my mid-wife know about it. I am very afraid of having another
big baby. I haven't seen any replies saying that their 2nd child
was smaller. Well I guess i'm in the same boat as a lot of other
mom's in here!
-Chris
|
148.19 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Tue Jun 09 1992 10:52 | 8 |
| A friend delivered her second child - he was almost 11 pounds and she
said he was much easier than the first (who was near or under 8, I
don't remember). It could be because it was her second, or it could be
the labor and delivery method - she went with a mid-wife and did it
"their" way the second time.
-sandy
|
148.20 | IF you want to hear huge baby stories! | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Tue Jun 09 1992 11:04 | 8 |
| My uncle (married my aunt) was one of twins, both boys. Mama Ditella (an
Italian immigrant) delivered the twins normally. One weighed 10 pounds and the
other weighed 11 lbs. She had to have a support strap for the last three
months of the pregnancy.
She had one other son who weighed 12 lbs at birth.
ccb
|
148.21 | | RICKS::BARR | An Unusually Reliable Source | Tue Jun 09 1992 12:27 | 4 |
| I gained 18 lbs. with Shane. He was 5 days early and weighed 7 lbs. 5
1/2 oz. and was 22 1/2 inches long (he's still long and skinny!).
Lori B.
|
148.22 | genetics | SAHQ::HERNDON | Kristen, SOR, 385-2683 | Tue Jun 09 1992 13:00 | 39 |
|
Well here are a couple of examples...
Mother-out-law gained 11 lbs with #1....weighed in @ 8 lb 3 oz
gained 9 lbs with #2....weighed in @ 8 lb 7 oz
(I really wonder if this is all she gained...sounds
a little fishy to me...)
My mom gained - 25 lbs with #1....weighed in at 6 lb 4 oz
17 lbs with #2....me...weighed in at 6 lb 2 oz
20 lbs with #3....weighed in at 5 lb 10 oz
I gained...are you ready...60 lbs...I like other people lost
weight just before becoming preggers....and gained it back plus
25 lbs....my baby weighed 8 lbs 15 oz...and I walked out of the
hospital 40 lbs lighter....seems I had a ton of water...
So hard to pass up the chow when you feel like you 'deserve' it.
I've learned my lesson....we'll see if I remember it with #2.
I think weight gain and baby size may have a little to do with
it...but I really think it is genetics...just like some babies
gain weight real quickly after their born and others barely make
it to the 50 percent...
My sister's kid weighed in at 7lb 12 oz when born...she gained
35 lbs...by 4 months he weighed 18 lbs and was 28 inches...get
this...this gain was on BREAST MILK!
Mine was bigger when he was born but was 14lb 10 oz and 26 inches
at 4 months....mine was breast fed too.
I personally, for some reason, feel better having a big baby...
kind of makes you feel like you did something right...
Kristen
|
148.23 | What abour third? | WHEEL::POMEROY | | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:13 | 13 |
| I can't remember how much I gained with my son, seems like approx.
40 lbs. He weighed 8.14.
With my daughter, I gained 55 lbs and she weighed in at 9.2.
I'm curious about my next one (whenever that will be). Are third
babies bigger or smaller? Is labor longer or shorter?
My first labor was 8 hours, the second was only 4 hours. Does
that mean the third will be 2 hours??? :-)
|
148.24 | How big were/are you?? | ICS::NELSONK | | Tue Jun 09 1992 16:27 | 26 |
| Dear .0,
How much did you and your spouse/SO weigh at birth? In my case,
I was 7 lbs. 9 oz. and Mike was 7 lbs. 8 oz. (maybe 4 oz., I can't
remember). My son was 8 lbs. (a C-section baby because he was
footling breech) and my daughter was 7 lbs. 9 oz. So the parents'
size has something to do with it, too, I think.
I gained 29 lbs. with my son and 31 with my daughter. I was more
careful to eat fruits, vegetables, salads, etc., the second time
around, but I don't think I was quite as active. I tried to walk
when I was pregnant with my son, but I was so worn out and felt
so lousy all during pregnancy #2 that I didn't really give a damn.
I think if you are trying to get "more bang for the buck" by
concentrating on nutritious foods and trying your best to skip
the junk foods (this from a woman who craved Cheetos, birthday
cake with frosting and Coke in her 1st pregnancy), you'll do OK.
It's hard to take off weight post-pregnancy, but you'll do a little
better if you've used your pregnancy to reform your eating habits a
bit!
If you want to talk about VBAC experiences, please send me mail
off-line. I had a successful VBAC last year, and will be glad to
offer support, a shoulder to cry on, etc., etc. I was a nervous
wreck, too, BTW.
|
148.25 | What now?? | CIVIC::HALL | | Thu Jun 11 1992 13:20 | 14 |
| I gained 36 pounds with my first pregnancy and had a 9 pound 4 oz baby
girl - this after 17 hours of labor (Back) and then an emergency
C-Section. When I awoke from the anesthesia to ask how big my baby
was, I was astounded! (I'm all of 4 feet 9 3/4 inches tall)
My second pregnancy saw a 32 pound weight gain, a planned C-section and
a 7 1/2 pound baby girl. She was a peanut compared to my first.
Now its pregnancy #3 - 8 more weeks to go. Have gained 36 pounds
(yikes!) and have no idea what size baby to expect. This one really
has me guessing.
Judy
|
148.26 | BIG baby | OFFPLS::KETTENSTOCK | | Mon Aug 03 1992 20:51 | 12 |
| I gained 50 pounds during my pregnancy and had a 10 pound 2 oz baby
boy, my doctor thought he would be 8 pounds at best. After 16 hours
of labor and 1 1/2 hours of pushing I ended up having a C-section
(the epidural was wonderful!)
I ate alot during my pregnancy, I just couldn't seem to get enough
food in me. Supposedly I'm a good candidate for VBAC but if I
gain a similar amount of weight with my second child, I think I'll go
with a C-section again. I'm happy to say the extra pounds dropped off
very quickly and I'm back to my normal weight (I'm sure breastfeeding
has something to do with that.)
|
148.27 | I'm still worried he/she is BIG 8^) | GLDOA::LAETZ | | Tue Aug 04 1992 17:04 | 22 |
| A quick note from the basenoter . . .
I have 3 1/2 weeks until my due date. I have gained 25 pounds to date
(last time, I was up to 40 pounds -- my 42 pound gain was actually 48
pounds the first time according to the doctor's records).
The baby FEELS big, but I really can remember how it felt to have
Kristen (again, she was 9 lbs. 10 1/2 oz.).
Thanks for all of the input.
We are going to try for a VBAC, with my next doctors appointment with a
vag. check. My doctor thinks he can get a better idea as to whether
the baby's head is starting to drop (Kristen's didn't until REALLY
late) and by feeling (yeah, sure, he thought Kristen would be about 7-8
pounds by feeling the last time--DOCTORS!).
Still hoping for a little baby (7-8 pounds) . . .
Smiles, and best wishes . . .
Jolene
|
148.28 | 2nd baby bigger or smaller? | KOBAL::CJOHNSON | Eat, drink and see Jerry! | Thu Dec 03 1992 10:23 | 16 |
|
Moderators, please move this if there is a topic already written
(did a DIR/TITLE but couldn't find anything).
My son was 1 oz. shy of being 10 lbs. I am not looking forward for
my next baby to be this big (I didn't have a c-section either).
I was wondering if anyone had a big baby and then had a smaller baby?
And was this because you ate differently or it was just nature?
My mid-wife said that there may be nothing that I could do to prevent
Nicholas from being so big and that it could have been hereditary.
As long as the baby is healthy, I will go through anything but it
would be a plus if the baby was 7 or 8 lbs.
Thanks,
Chris
|
148.29 | Gestational Diabetes | ICS::SIMMONS | | Thu Dec 03 1992 10:32 | 11 |
| My first baby weighed in at 9lbs 2.5 ounces and my second was 8lbs 6
ounces. I did have to alter my eating habits with the second because
they discovered that I had gestational diabetes (borderline). It was
controlled with diet alone. They suspect that I was diabetic with the
first, but I was never tested. Testing became mandatory the year after
he was born. The Dr. said that if I did not control my diet (with baby
number 2) that he probably would have been 10lbs or better.
Just a thought ... with such a big baby ... have you been tested?
|
148.30 | I wish this was predictable... | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Just another tricky day | Thu Dec 03 1992 10:36 | 17 |
|
My sis in law had an 8lb 7oz her first and her second was 91bs even.
My first was 8lbs, and everyone says that was a big baby for me. I'm
5'1". I had her vaginally. And she was a real tough labor, but great
pregnancy. I'm hoping my current pregnancy will result in a smaller
baby. I gained 36 pound with my daughter, but I was also 10 lbs heavier
when I got pregnant with her. Maybe that has something to do with it.
I don't know.
I really wish that was one of the things you could predict during
pregnancy. The doctor told me I had at least a 9lb baby during a
non-stress test the day before labor began, he was wrong.
Good luck....
Sandy
|
148.31 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | hate is STILL not a family value | Thu Dec 03 1992 11:17 | 7 |
| My first two have been 6 lbs 10 oz and 6 lbs 2 oz respectively. I have
a freind who has had several kids and they have bounced all over the
scale from 9 1/2 lobs to 7 lbs, in all ranges and sexes. Birth order
has had nothing to do with her kids sizes, nor have weight gain
patterns.
Meg
|
148.32 | Birth weights have changed over the years | ICS::NELSONK | | Thu Dec 03 1992 12:51 | 19 |
| I kind of think that they're going to be the size that they're going to
be. Both of my kids were pretty close in weight; my son was 8 lbs.
and my daughter was 7 lbs. 9 oz. One of my sisters has four kids,
who ranged in birth weight from 7 lbs. even down to 3 lbs. 14 oz.
So you really cannot tell. Boys tend to be somewhat bigger than
girls. It's been said that second babies tend to be bigger than
first babies, but my S-I-L's third baby outweighed both of her
older sisters by more than a pound.
Size and weight are largely determined by genetics. Although I
think that better overall nutrition plays a role. When my older
sisters were having their babies in the late 1960s/early 1970s, you
almost NEVER heard of a baby who was 9 lbs. or more at birth. 8 lbs.
was considered large; most babies that I can recall hearing about
back then were 6 or 7 lbs. Now, however, 9 and 10 lb. babies are
fairly common. I do agree, though, that you be tested for gestational
diabetes, as much for your own health's sake as for the baby's.
|
148.33 | some more stats | GLITTR::WARREN | | Thu Dec 03 1992 15:34 | 7 |
| My first daughter was 9-3; my second 9-8.
In my family, my older brother was 8, I was 8-9, and my younger brother
was 9-8.
-Tracy
|
148.34 | Second Slightly Smaller | SWAM2::OSBORNE_JA | | Thu Dec 03 1992 19:02 | 13 |
| My first baby was 9lbs 8oz, my second was 9lbs 1oz. Both boys, and
I gained even more weight with number 2! My doctor was extremely
concerned about the potential size of my second baby - he was afraid
it might be an 11 pounder (because second babies tend to be larger
and because of my weight gain). He sent me for an ultrasound the
day before my due date to guesstimate the size of the baby. The
ultrasound doc was excellent, and he predicted just over 9 lbs.
I was tested and did not have gestational diabetes.
My second labor was a fraction of the length and difficulty of my
first, but the pushing stage (which is the part relating to the
baby's size) was about the same.
|
148.35 | large babies = onset diabetes ? | AKOCOA::BOLAND | | Fri Dec 04 1992 13:52 | 16 |
|
FYI: .2 and .4
My mother, 5'0", has had 4 children, myself and 3 younger brothers.
We were born starting in 1960-66. I was 10 lbs 1 1/4 oz and my brothers
were all over 9lbs. Talk about a difficult births for a tiny woman.
I was very concerned about this as I didn't think birthing a 10 lb child
would be much fun. My daughter weighed in a 8 lbs 6 1/2 oz. I think
that the child will be what the child will be.
I'm glad I didn't follow in my mother's footsteps. Oh, she also did
develope diabetes later in life, and some doctors contribute this to
the large babies.
Just FYI.
|
148.36 | decreasing | SHARE::HOUGHTON | | Fri Dec 04 1992 17:15 | 6 |
|
My girlfriend just had her third, each time, they decreased in
weight, #1 was 8lbs 6oz, #2 was 8lbs 2oz, and #3 was 7lbs 8oz. She was
extremely busy being at home with a child(ren) which she thinks
contributed to lower weight, but she gained about the same overall
weight with each child. I guess it is just a random thing...
|
148.37 | | STOWOA::STOCKWELL | MOO MOO Mania | Mon Aug 29 1994 15:42 | 5 |
| I am 5'10" - I gained 17lbs and my daughter weighed in at 8lbs 3ozs.
They told me all throughout pregnancy that taller woman have an
"easier" delivery - well they were wrong.
|