T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
94.1 | Drink soda - wait - blood test | DKAS::DKAS::GOODWIN | Malin Goodwin | Tue May 05 1992 14:41 | 20 |
|
I had this test done a few weeks ago. Nothing was said at the time about not
eating before the test, I had my usual breakfast before going to the doctors.
The procedure was quite simple. I was given a carbonated orange soda type drink.
It was cold and should be consumed within 5 minutes. After that it
was just to wait for an hour (bring a good book). After the completed hour a
blood test was taken.
(I was given the option to come by the lab, pick up the drink and bring it home,
drink it at home when connvenient and then show up at the lab for a blood test
an hour later.)
I had no problems, the worst was to drink all that cold soda (10 oz I think) in
a short time, I usually prefer drinks that are not ice cold.
Hopes this helps
/Malin
|
94.2 | Cola, take home | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Tue May 05 1992 15:01 | 14 |
|
I was given the syrup (Cola flavored) to take home at my previous
visit. Dont remember being told I couldn't eat (that would of been
tough being my appt was at 4pm), but just told to drink the syrup
(cold) 1 hour before my appt and nothing else (I brought it to work).
Then they just took some blood and that was it.
Everyone said the syrup would be AWFUL tasting, but I didn't think the
Cola flavor was bad at all. Just tasted like flat coke.
Enjoy your pregnancy,
Chris
|
94.3 | you can eat | CRONIC::ORTH | | Tue May 05 1992 15:13 | 26 |
| For the initial diabetic screeining, which they do on virtually all
pregnant women, you may, indeed, eat beforehand. Sometimes they will
tell you to try not to go heavy on very sugary stuff, sometimes, not.
You drink a glucose laden soda type drink, wait one hour, and they draw
blood. That is all there is to it.
If the results are not within normal range ( and sometimes, even if
they are, if they're at the high end of normal), you go for a 3 hour
test. This one is fasting (no food). Blood is drawn (if I remember
correctly) right at first (a urine sample is collected then, too), then
after one hour, two hours, and three hours. If you throw up during the
3 hours, it botches it all up, and you'll have to do it agian.
Usual time for the inital screeining is 28 weeks. I've not heard of it
at 24. My wife's endocrinologist said the reasom for this is, that if
you are going to become gestationally diabetic, the usual time for it
to really surge up (blood sugar will rise dramatically) is between 26
and 28 weeks. To do it sooner, can mean missing this. My wifes' was
detected the first pregnancy at this 28 week screening, though was
probably present much earlier. In the subsequent pregnancy it showed
up at 12 weeks. But at 28 weeks on the button, there was a dramatic
jump in her blood sugar, and her need for increased insulin.
She says one hour tests are a piece of cake!
--dave--
|
94.4 | Just a warning... | NEWPRT::NEWELL_JO | Latine loqui coactus sum | Tue May 05 1992 15:48 | 5 |
| By the way, if you're on Brethine or Terbutaline for asthma or
preterm labor, your sugar levels will most likely be high enough
for the doctor to require the 5-hour glucose test.
Jodi-
|
94.5 | Is this standard? | SSDEVO::HODGES | | Tue May 05 1992 17:26 | 13 |
|
Hmmm...I've heard people talk about this test before, to the point that
it sounds like it is fairly common practice. However, I NEVER had it
done when I was pregnant. I had my daughter in the summer of 1990.
Did they possibly make it "standard" after that? Anyone know why
some pregnant women are not asked to take this test? I never had
any tests (not even an Ultra Sound), except when they drew
blood and took a urine sample in my 1st trimester (?) to test iron count,
etc..
Just curious...
Julia
|
94.6 | | NEWPRT::NEWELL_JO | Latine loqui coactus sum | Tue May 05 1992 18:39 | 11 |
| RE: .5
Most likely, oversight.
I was a high-risk patient and at 35 weeks I asked my OB
about the test because of some discussion going on in this
notes conference. She was embarrassed to admit that she had
overlooked the fact that the test wasn't ordered. I did,
however, receive every *other* test in the book :^)
Jodi-
|
94.7 | pretty standard in northeast U.S., at least | CRONIC::ORTH | | Tue May 05 1992 18:46 | 19 |
| I'd agree probably an oversight.
What area of the country do you live in? It's pretty well standard
procedure in the northeast U.S., anyway. My wife had it done routinely
for all 4 kids, starting in 1985.
Just a note... ultrasounds are *not* routine, at least not for most
dr.s. There are some who do do them routinely, but the A.C.O.G.
(American College of Obstretrics and Gynecology) does not recommend
this. I think those who recommend it routinely are trying to cover
their tails, in case something goes wrong, that the parents cannot
later come back and say, "If you'd done an ultrasound, you would have
detected this". My wife had one with the first cause they suspected a
possibility of twins. The second pregnancy she had one done because the
first one had been premature. The third and fourth she was
gestationally diabetic, and had umpteen ultrasounds (I believe a total
of 19 with the last child!).
--dave--
|
94.8 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Wed May 06 1992 10:43 | 8 |
| The blood sugar levels can be tested with urine (which they ask for at
every visit, right). They may be doing the ol' litmus test and if you
are borderline they will ask for a more accurate test. I don't recall
having the diabetes test done on me with either, but then that was a
long time ago (heh - 5 years)
-sandy
|
94.9 | additional warning | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Wed May 06 1992 10:51 | 26 |
| As far as I know the glucose tolerance test is standard procedure
in Canada too. I had it for both pregnancies, and had the 3 hour
one done inbetween the two, just to rule out sugar problems as
a reason why the first did not survive to term.
In all cases I drank about 10 - 12 oz of stuff that looked like
syrup of Orange Crush. While I did not get too much nausea, I did
experience a great sleepiness near the end, When I commented about this
to the lab staff they said it was a very common reaction. So sleepy
in fact, (during the 3 hour one) that it made it difficult to drive
home.
For the 3 hour one I had blood drawn 6 times. I don't have a phobia
about needles, but I have very small veins -- I was quite sore after
the test!
On Ultrasounds: As far as I know, in Quebec, every expectant Mother
gets, routinely, an ultrasound at 18-20 weeks and another at 28-30
weeks. In Ontario only the first is routinely ordered by doctors.
I have been getting one a week, just as a precaution, and as I have
mentioned elsewhere, this is done by an OB and not a regular
technician. The OB scores the baby (much like the apgar at birth)
for such things as "breathing practice", state of the placenta,
position, etc. (Gosh and I always hated tests as a kid and here my
child is being tested and scored even before its born!)
Monica
|
94.10 | not standard here? | SSDEVO::HODGES | | Wed May 06 1992 13:13 | 24 |
| <<< Note 94.7 by CRONIC::ORTH >>>
-< pretty standard in northeast U.S., at least >-
> I'd agree probably an oversight.
Actually, after reading later replies, I do remember supplying a urine
sample at almost (or all) visits. And as later stated, maybe they measure
the level and do a test only if it is suspcious?? I think that this
is probably why I didn't get one.
> What area of the country do you live in? It's pretty well standard
procedure in the northeast U.S., anyway.
I live in the Mid-west (Colorado). I'd say about 50% of my friends
have had the test and 50% haven't.
> Just a note... ultrasounds are *not* routine, at least not for most
dr.s.
Agreed - my doctor doesn't do them unless he suspects problems or
needs to reassess the due date. I guess my point was that since he
didn't suspect any problems along these lines, maybe that's why he
didn't have a gluecose test done??
|
94.11 | test, test, test! | 9886::CLENDENIN | | Wed May 06 1992 13:16 | 15 |
|
The glucose tolerance test is done at 28 weeks generally. Like
everyone has said it realy is a very easy test.
The ultra sound is done differently by ever doctor, some do it between
14 and 18 weeks just to check due dates, I had 4 done with my first
pregnancy. The first was to check my due date, the 2nd the tech did
not get the pictures the doctor wanted, and the last 2 I had because
my daughter was 15 days late and they just wanted to make sure
everything was ok.
Enjoy the pregnancy.
Lisa
|
94.12 | 12 hour fast beforehand | VMSSG::KILLORAN | | Wed May 06 1992 14:51 | 33 |
|
I was told to fast 12 hours before the test. They did both
blood and urine. I flunked and had to go in for the 5
hour test. They took blood first to get my fasting glucose
count. Then they made me drink the horrible orange drink.
The Lab Tech gave me a glass of water afterwards to take the
taste away. She told me that I could have as much water as
I wanted. Then repeated the test by taking blood and a urine
sample every hour.
I thought what a horrible thing to do to a pregnant women.
Plus I had the worst heartburn and they wouldn't let me take
any Tums.
Unfortunately I was diagnosed with GD. They put me on a special
diet for the rest of my pregnancy. The good thing is I didn't
gain any weight.
It was a very frightening thing. This notefile explained alot
about GD. It made me feel like I was not alone, and that was
very comforting. If you are diagnosed with it, you will have it for
every pregnancy. Now I know what to expect next time.
Jeanne
|
94.13 | comments | CRONIC::ORTH | | Wed May 06 1992 17:41 | 28 |
| Some points to clear up....
The urine test done at every visit can test for sugar in the urine, but
that is not what they are checking for! They are checking for protein
in the urine (sign of toxemia). They usually do check for sugar
too, but if your blood sugar is high enough to register in your urine,
you are in trouble! Blood sugar must be 180 or above to show in urine,
and it should *never* be allowed to get anywhere near that high in GD.
reply .12 mentioned fasting for 12 hours. This cannot have been for the
one hour test, cna it? Very unusual if it was! Your comment about
muliple blood samples leads me to think you meant the three hour test.
Is that right?
On the comment in previous reply (sorry, can't recall which one) that
they maybe didn't test cause they had no reason to suspect anything. GD
is a "silent" problem, usually. You usually never would even suspect it
was there. When my wife went back for her 6 week postpartum check after
her first GD pregnancy, her dr. asked if she felt normal and
"un-diabetic". She replied she never had "felt" diabetic, so she wasn't
sure! They checked her blood sugar and it was normal.
"Regular" diabetics have more symptoms than GD's. Blood sugar is kept
under *much* tighter rein with GD's than non-pregnant "regular"
diabetics.
--dave--
|
94.14 | fasting for just 1 blood sample | TARKIN::TRIOLO | Victoria Triolo | Wed May 06 1992 18:02 | 8 |
|
I had a twelve hour fast for 1 blood sample. I was told to drank the
horrible orange soda and wait 1 hour and then have them take a blood sample.
At the forty-five minute mark, I proceeded to almost faint so
they made me lay down, ordered breakfast for me and took the blood
sample.
This was done at St. Vincent's hospital in Worcester, MA.
|
94.15 | | VMSSG::KILLORAN | | Thu May 07 1992 12:03 | 43 |
|
.13
Dave,
I was told to fast before the 1 hour and the 3 hour tests.
When I arrived at St. Joes Hospital in Nashua they asked
me if I had eaten anything in the past twelve hours. If
I had, they would have rescheduled my test.
My glucose count was at 260 after drinking the orange drink.
I believe that normally your readings should be 60 to 100.
They would like to see it around 80. I was able to get
it under control by diet and then number went down to the
70's. What a relief. Another thing was I had to check my
urine every morning for Ketones.
An easy way to explain what Ketones are is: After a person's
body has burned up all the calories/enzymes in their food - then they
start burning Ketones - Ketones are like a waste and bad for the
baby's system. They can be past over to the infant. The
diabetic educator at the hospital used an example of a fire
place with logs - you burn the logs and are left with ashes.
The ashes are the Ketones.
The biggest worry is that if a woman is diagnosed with GD,
she can develop diabetes later on in life (from age 40).
Your chances of fighting it are a well balanced diet,
exercise and to keep your weight down.
Another thing if this goes undetected, after the baby is
born it can go into shock. It's glucose levels can be
out of wack. It's pancreas may be in overdrive. When
I was in labor everyone at the hospital was allerted
that I had GD. Fortunately things turned out fine and
the baby was okay. Sometimes they have to give the
baby an IV, or give it sugar water to get the levels
right.
Jeanne
|
94.16 | some fasting: | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Thu May 07 1992 13:17 | 5 |
| I only had to fast for the 3 hour test - I checked with
them specifically the first time for the 1 hour; they said I
did not have to.
Monica
|
94.17 | no eating OR drinking\ | ASABET::CARTER | | Mon May 11 1992 16:09 | 9 |
| When I had this test done my appointment was made for 9:00am and I was
instructed not to eat OR drink anything from midnight on. This test is
done in my Dr's office in Framingham and needless to say I hit
Friendly's immeadiately after the test.
My Dr also told me the test needed to be done between 26-28 weeks for
best accuracy.
..Tracy
|
94.18 | interesting... | BSLOPE::BOURQUARD | Deb | Mon May 11 1992 19:42 | 9 |
| I had the "O'Sullivan screening" last week or so (around 28 weeks). My
appointment was at 4pm, and they recommended that I eat a snack (though
not a hot fudge sundae) prior to the test. I ate a pear. Drank my "margarita"
and had my finger pricked an hour later.
Mostly I'm surprised that some doctors require fasting.
My results were within normal ranges, so lunch and the pear did not raise
my glucose levels sufficiently...
|
94.19 | | CIVIC::MACFAWN | Training to be tall and blonde | Tue May 12 1992 14:46 | 5 |
| Being a "real" diabetic, I can say that GD sounds a lot simpler than
the real thing. I went through two pregnancies, which was a nightmare,
but was well worth it in the long run.
Gail
|
94.20 | Only had to drink 1/2 the bottle | WYNDE::TILLERY | | Wed May 13 1992 10:48 | 5 |
| I had the test done yesterday, and I'm 26 weeks. I only had to drink
half the bottle of liquid, and they wrote on my slip that I could eat.
Easy test, blood was drawn an hour after I drank the liquid.
Sue
|
94.21 | flunked 1 hr., passed 3 hr. | WYNDE::TILLERY | | Fri May 22 1992 12:17 | 6 |
| Just an update to my previous reply. I didn't pass the screening
for diabetes, so I had to do the 3 hour diabetes test, but I passed
that with flying colors. I wasn't even close to being on the high
side. Who can figure... don't know why I didn't pass the screening.
Sue
|
94.22 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Fri May 22 1992 12:32 | 6 |
| My sister always flunked the 1 hr test, but passed the 3 hr test.
Seems when she ingested sugar it took longer to process than usual so
her tests were way off. Helps not to eat Snickers for breakfast!!
-sandy
|
94.23 | How is a "real" diabetic pregnancy worse??? | CRONIC::ORTH | | Fri Jul 10 1992 20:32 | 21 |
| Gail,
Don't know what it is like for a "real" diabetic, but can't imagine
it's any worse than what my wife went through! By pregnancy's end, she
was testing her blood 4x daily, taking 80 units of NPH at 8 pm, and 15
units regular before each meal. She was being seen weekly for OB visit,
ultrasound, and non-stress test. They delivered her 2.5 weeks early for
fear of extreme fetal size (Jake only weighed 7lbs. 6 oz! Daniel
weighed 8 lbs. 15 oz. with our first GD pregnancy).
Her diet requirements were extremely rigid, and her endocrinologist
conferred with her by phone every other day the last 6 weeks, to insure
proper insulin regulation.
How is a "real" diabetic pregnancy different? Or worse? Doctor expects
her to become a "real" diabetic sometime in the future. Could be any
time, actually, she needs to be tested yearly now.
Just curious!
--dave--
|
94.24 | | DECWIN::JACKIE | Jackie Ferguson | Tue Jul 14 1992 16:44 | 27 |
| I just had the three hour test this morning, slightly different procedure
than some of the earlier notes I read here. I had the short test done last
week at 28.5 weeks, this one was done at 29.5 weeks.
I had the test done at 8:45 in the morning, and was told to fast from midnight.
When I first got to the lab, they did a urine sample and blood. The
technician said that she wanted to do all the blood samples in the same
vein, unless it started to get sore. Then I got to drink the whole cola drink.
When I did the shorter test, I only had to drink half the bottle, this time I
had to drink the whole bottle. Then I had to do urine and blood at the
following times- half hour past the initial drink, one hour, two hours, and
three hours, for a total of five drainings. At the one and two hour drainings,
I was allowed to have one glass of ice water, that was it.
The worst part was giving the urine samples at the half and one hour mark,
without having anything to eat or drink since dinner the night before. I could
have prepared better for this if I had known :-) Fortunately, I was able to
come up with the very small amount that they need.
I felt a little upset around the one hour mark, but having the water helped
to get the cola taste out of my mouth. I also felt a bit dizzy as I wolfed
down my lunch when I got back to work.
They say the results will be back in one to two days. My initial test was
slightly high (so the nurse told me) so I'm hoping I passed this one.
Jackie
|
94.25 | | VMSSG::KILLORAN | | Wed Jul 15 1992 17:10 | 42 |
|
Hi Jackie,
If you felt dizzy or tired, it might mean that you have
GD. I was told that it is a side effect. Then again,
it may have mean't nothing at all.
When I was diagnosed with GD last summer, I thought it
was the end to the world. But next time I know what to
expect and am not bothered by it.
The OB/GYN had me meet with the Diabetic Educator at the
hospital. She explained what caused GD, and watched a
little film. She also explained how to check my glucose
levels (I had the nurse do it in Health Services because
I am too much of a baby to prick my finger myself). Then
she gave me a booklet with instructions and a chart to
keep track of the levels. Once they knew I was following
the diet and my levels were under control, I only had to
have my blood tested once per week. Also every morning
I had to check my urine for Ketones.
The diet was very easy. In the morning for breakfast I
was not allowed to have fruit. I could have tea and toast
with butter and an egg, or a bowl of cereal (cherios, or
corn flakes for example - not cereal with sugar added).
Morning snack a piece of fruit and some cheese - or milk.
Lunch - I had a sandwich with meat and cheese, I could have
a potato chips if I wanted and a something to drink (milk,
water something sugar free no juice). Afternoon snack
was yogurt. Then dinner meat or fish, vegies rice or potato.
I had to have a snack around bedtime - since I was not a
big milk drinker they recommended that I have a bowl of
cereal. This is to help prevent Ketones in the morning
urine.
Good luck,
Jeanne
|
94.26 | test turned out ok. | DECWIN::JACKIE | Jackie Ferguson | Wed Jul 22 1992 15:26 | 13 |
| I got the results of the test today at my regular visit.
The 1 hour test had had a reading of 167, and my doctor said that they wanted
it to be under 140.
On the three hour test, they look for it to be under 160, and three of the five
readings must be above that to fail the test. Only the reading at the one hour
mark was high, at 164. The initial reading before having the drink was around
70, I think, which she said was very good.
So, it looks like the 1 hour and 3 hour showed the same thing.
Jackie
|
94.27 | Great news | VMSSG::KILLORAN | | Thu Jul 23 1992 10:58 | 12 |
|
Great news Jackie. It's good to hear that you are fine.
My readings were 92 before the drink, 1st hour 245, 2nd hour 228,
and the 3rd hour 222. They gave me one week to get the glucose
count down and under control by diet.
Jeanne
|
94.28 | fail 1 hr; pass 3 hr | CRLVMS::HALBERT | mail to CRL::HALBERT | Wed Sep 23 1992 18:56 | 10 |
| Just to reassure others who might be worried between tests:
My wife also did not pass the initial one-hour diabetes screening test,
which gave a reading of 168, and started worrying about the possibility
of GD. But she passed the three-hour test with no trouble. Based on
notes in this conference and its previous versions, and asking around
among friends, it's apparently quite common to fail the first test and
pass the second. I wish we could have seen some statistics.
Dan
|
94.29 | We flunked the 1hr. test. | NUPE::hamp | Buttonflyed! | Tue Oct 19 1993 14:46 | 11 |
| Reading these replies have made me feel better and I hope to pass on
those good feeling to Tam. She got a call today telling her that she
flunk her 1 hr test. (She was boarderline). Soooo, she's schedule for
the 3 hr. next week. This is our second pregnancy. No such problems
with our first. She has been ill lately with a cold and a sinus
infection for which she has been taking antibiotics. Would that have
any affect? They also told her that she needs to start taking iron
supplements. She did take those the first time around.
Hamp
|
94.30 | no big deal | KAOFS::M_BARNEY | Dance with a Moonlit Knight | Tue Oct 19 1993 15:29 | 8 |
| a borderline result is not uncommon, and in my experience they
will easily ask that one performs the 3 hour test. I passed my
1 hour with flying colours the first time, but after I lost the
baby late in the pregnancy they decided to give me the 3 hour
just as a precaution. Lots of nausea later, they said I was okay.
(Actually the most surprising side effect was the sleepiness)..,
Monica
|
94.31 | | GOOEY::ROLLMAN | | Tue Oct 19 1993 15:44 | 8 |
|
I failed the one hour test, but passed the
3 hour test easily, only 1 week later.
go figure...
Pat
|