T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
48.1 | Me too. | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Mon Apr 20 1992 13:44 | 12 |
| I am just over 6 weeks away and I am experiencing the same aches and
pains as you mention. I feel the mild menstrual type cramp in the
lowest areas of my belly off and on - more off than on. Then on
Saturday my right thigh experienced the worst pain/I get them during my
periods - my husband massaged my thigh for a few minutes and I was
fine.
All this in addition to muscle-ache while going from sitting to
standing position especially after sitting for a long time (which these
days is 1/2 hour).
Shaila
|
48.2 | Here's what happened to me | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Just another tricky day | Tue Apr 21 1992 09:46 | 18 |
| I experienced that pain also. As far as what happened in the final
weeks. I lost my mucus plug 2 weeks before I went into labor. One week
after my due date I was going to the bathroom and my water broke! Thank
god I was in the right place at the right time... Immediately following
that I started contractions 5 min. apart. I had to go to the hospital
within the hour because when my water broke I had Meconium and they
have to monitor that as soo as possible so baby doesn't breath any of
it in. So my labor started with out warning, I had never had a
contraction up untill that time. I was glad my water broke, because at
least I knew I was in labor. Anyway, that was the beginning of what
followed to be 21 hours of labor! AAGGG!. But it was well worth the pain
believe me.
Take care and best wishes,
Sandy
|
48.3 | Me too!!! | MLTVAX::HUSTON | Chris's Mom! | Tue Apr 21 1992 10:20 | 10 |
| I have 5 weeks to go until I am due, (May 26th). I also have those
lower abdomen pains occasionally. I just assumed that it was the
muscles stretching as the baby's head moved down. Alot like menstrual
cramps, but stretching feeling too. I just take it as a good sign
that things are progressing towards the labor scene!! This is my
second, so I guess I don't worry about the aches and pains as much
as I did with my first. Good luck!!! to everyone else who is close too.
-Sheila
|
48.4 | Some people get a stuffy nose at the end | ICS::NELSONK | | Tue Apr 21 1992 10:21 | 21 |
| I found myself going to the bathroom about 1 million times a day
at the end of both pregnancies. For some reason I especially
remember this with James, my oldest, who was footling breech.
I did not sleep well at all, and had various aches, pains,
cramps, etc.
In both pregnancies the start of labor was quite different.
With James, my water broke first. With Hollis, I just started
having contractions. The doctor broke the amniotic sac with her
when I was about 9 cm. dilated. I don't remember losing the
mucus plug either time.
Just take it really slow now -- as if you could move fast if you
wanted to. Nature has its own rhythms, and these last few weeks
are a way of telling you to take it easy.
One other thing: Several small meals a day sat better on my tummy
than three big ones, although a big breakfast went down real smooth
most mornings. Generally my snacks were fresh fruit, vegetables,
and yogurt cups. I also drank a lot of water, because I was breathing
through my mouth a lot and was getting very dried out.
|
48.5 | Head moving down... | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Tue Apr 21 1992 10:32 | 12 |
|
Monica,
I had the same type of pains you described just before Michael was born
also, and my doctors said it was probably the head engaging (sp?) and
the muscles stretching. It was engaging alright...felt like I was
walking around the last few weeks with a watermelon between my legs.
Thinking of you, and DYING to hear the news!
Chris
|
48.6 | my experience | SAHQ::HERNDON | Kristen, SOR, 385-2683 | Tue Apr 21 1992 10:32 | 45 |
|
I had my baby on Jan 19. I had the same kind of pressure you
are talking about. I had Mitch 5 days earlier than my due date and
the pressure started around 2 weeks earlier. It felt like I
was going to start my period.
When I went to my dr's appointment, he just told me it was
pressure from the baby...a big baby (9 lb)! I also developed pretty
strong braxton hicks when I walked or did too much.
One thing I did notice about 4 days before I had Mitch, I
started feeling nauseous again in the mornings and would get
waves of it thoughout the day. I asked the doc if it meant I
would go into labor soon and he said "some people think it does
mean you will and some think it means nothing."
My dr appt was on a Wednesday and on Sunday there
was going to be a full moon. I asked him if that would have any
impact and he said it definately does. The full moon seems to start
labor more than any other method. He was right...I went into labor at
3:30 am Sunday morning....Although, for weeks I knew I was going to
have him that weekend...don't know how but just did...so who knows.
Is there a full moon around your due date?
One last thing....I never lost my mucous plug...if I did, it must
have happened in the shower. 4 days before I went into labor I
noticed a clear discharge. 2 days later, it had a slight pink
look to it. I thought this was my plug...wrong! It was amniotic
fluid. The leak was so small that I didn't realize it. I looked
in all my books to determine if that was what it was, but my
'problem' did not resemble any of the descriptions so I just ignored
it. I'm lucky Mitch or me didn't develop any infections.
The one thing I found so frustrating about having my first child
is that I relied too heavily on the books and not my instincts.
I really think no 2 labors are alike and you have to use your common
sense. Read the books, listen to people's stories, but use your
head. Call the doctor if you're really concerned. That's what
we pay them for. If you don't feel good about the answer, call
another doctor.
Sorry this is so long....just got carried away....!
Kristen
|
48.7 | glad to hear from everyone! | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Tue Apr 21 1992 15:24 | 23 |
| Well, there'll be a full moon May 2nd, weeks before term......
As fas as nausea is concern, it seems to have come back throughout
the third trimester, a long with an increase in the congestion that
plagued me throughout both pregnancies. (as a matter of fact I did
not get to keep ANY of this mornings' breakfast !)
Discharge is also on the increase these last few weeks, although no
colour.
I was under the impression that loosing the plug means labour within
a few days...2 weeks is a long time!
Yes, having had last year's experience with labour (and listening to
all of the labour stories here), I am prepared for several variations
on the delivery theme 8-)
I like the watermelon analogy... My inner thigh muscles are so tired
I feel "wishboned" a lot of the time.
And hubby just stares at my and says "oh my goodness" in utter
amazement. I tell him I am not the woman he married. He responds:
"No, you're much more!"
Monica
|
48.8 | Another member of the club | ASIC::MYERS | | Tue Apr 21 1992 15:36 | 15 |
| I may as well join the final weeks band wagon. I'm having the same
pressures and cramping, too, and my doctor said it's just the baby settling
down. I can't imagine that it's settling down at all since I'm still
carrying very high and out front. The night time is bad since all my
ligaments stiffen and it makes rolling over a delightful experience 8^)
This kid also has found my sciatic nerve, you just never know when
you're going to feel this stabbing pain at the top of your leg while
your legs gives out, too.
Hmmm, I just checked my calendar and it said New Moon May 2nd and Full
Moon May 16th.
Hope everyone's having fun 8^)
Susan (due May 17th - hubby's bday)
|
48.9 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Wed Apr 22 1992 10:17 | 16 |
| Since most people feel better when they hear someone else could be
worse off, let me tell you a little story. A neighbor of mine is 16
days overdue on Monday. She goes in for an induction at 7:00am. At
8:30pm she comes home (driving the car while the husband is the
passenger). She goes back the next morning and at noon - still
nothing - meaning no dialation at all.
I haven't seen her husband to talk to him, but I am sure they did
c-section last night. I sure hope for her sake she is resting
comfortably at this point.
UGH!!
-sandy
|
48.10 | Flu like symptoms?? | FSOA::EFINIZIO | | Wed Apr 22 1992 11:48 | 14 |
|
Well...hears another one for you. I'm 7 weeks away from my
due date...June 12th. Since Friday I've been experiencing
cramping, diarrehea off and on, and some nausea. Saw my
OB yesterday, who didn't seem concerned but thought that it
could be a virus, or I could be one of those lucky women who feel
louzy in their last trimester. Now my son or husband show no
signs of the flu...so I'm wondering. It comes off and on....I
feel fine right now, but yesterday I did also, and went home and
felt lousy all over.
Anyone else had this type of experience?
Hoping it's a touch of the flu....
|
48.11 | | CSOA1::ZACK | | Wed Apr 22 1992 13:02 | 11 |
| RE: 10
I had the flu a week before my due/delivery date. At first I thought I
might be going into eary labor since I had just lost my plus and I had
diarrehea but as the day progressed I kept getting sicker and sicker and
started to run a fever. The flu went away in two days. No one else in my
family got sick either.
Hope your feeling better.
Angie
|
48.12 | Sniff and cough! | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Wed Apr 22 1992 13:03 | 8 |
| My favorite topc...:-). I am 6 weeks away (june 5th) and ever since i
caught a nasty cold/cough from my 3 year old about a month ago I have
not been free of some amount of congestion or cough. It is not a full
blown cold or cough but my nose gets stuffy when I sleep and I cough
off and on all thru the day and night. I am just attributing it
to having a low resistance to such things right now.
Shaila
|
48.13 | you're right, Susan | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Wed Apr 22 1992 15:10 | 24 |
| Yup, my calendar was deceiving me... there is a NEW moon on the 2nd
and 16th has the full moon. Well, Susan, it appears we are due the
same day!
I have read (and discussed it with my doc) that the runs are yet
another possible side effect of pregnancy -- I get them all the time
but attibute it mostly to a lot of fruit. If I DON'T eat enough
fruit during the day I have the opposite (and more painful!) effect.
As far as sleeping is concerned, about an average of once a week
for the last 2 months or so, I will be unable to fall back to
sleep for about 3 hours (!) after I make my trip to the washroom.
Its incredibly frustrating and I end up grabbing a bite and watching
an hour of television before I can bed down again.
Saw the doc this morning -- I'm doing great, she says and that heart
beat is absolutely tremendous! (gallop, gallop... Doc asks me if
I have a horse in there!)
We have installed a plastic sheet and two beach towels under the
regular sheets of the bed -- with all the crinkly sounds,
I now feel like an elephant in a candy wrapper at night! 8-)
Monica
|
48.14 | I can picture and elephant in a candy wrapper HAHAHAHAHAHA | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Wed Apr 22 1992 15:31 | 24 |
| Monica - I LOVE IT - an elephant in a candy wrapper!
I've had a slight stomach bug for the last few weeks. My son had the
virus with sick stomach and vomiting for two days. My husband has had
the other end working overtime. We are all feeling fine otherwise.
I remember with my second - I delivered at 11:10 in the evening.
Around midnight, I sent my husband home to sleep and I stayed in
recovery (no one else needed the space, so I got to sleep there where I
was alone and it was quiet). Anyway, about 2:00 I woke up with the
worst cramps, I thought I was having a twin! Next thing I new,
diahyou-know-what. I couldn't stop it. If you thought having a baby
took away your modesty, try having a nurse come into your room three
times in one night to clean you up and change your sheets. I was so
sick from the flu I couldn't even get up to the bathroom. Come to find
out, my oldest (then 2) also had the dreaded flu!
With my first I felt generally yuck for three - four days before I went
into labor - which I didn't expect because he came 4 weeks early. 8^)
Who knows what it all means!!!
-sandy
|
48.15 | Not a horse of course! | STUDIO::POIRIER | | Wed Apr 22 1992 16:48 | 13 |
| RE:.13
Monica,
You know it is not a horse, right? Didn't I read that you *do* know
*what* "it" is in the last volume of parenting?
I'm sure I am not alone when I wish you well, you are in my thoughts a
lot and I admire your courage!
Waiting to hear....
Beth
|
48.16 | Tired and turning baby question | WFOV11::MOKRAY | | Wed Apr 22 1992 17:09 | 7 |
| I'm due June 1 but the baby is still breech. Anyone have experience re
if he will turn by himself or what doctors do to try to turn him in
place of a C- section?
Also, I was just hit with the most tremendous tiredness that it took me
to the nurses where I napped for 20 minutes easy. It was either that
or crawl under my desk.
|
48.17 | they can turn at the last minute | BSLOPE::BOURQUARD | Deb | Wed Apr 22 1992 17:16 | 4 |
| One of my friends just had a baby. Hers was in the breech position at 32 weeks
and her doctor said they'd have a C-section if it remained that way. Baby
went head-down around 34 weeks.
|
48.18 | Another Crampy Case | NEWPRT::SZAFIRSKI_LO | IVF...I'm Very Fertile! | Wed Apr 22 1992 19:52 | 19 |
| Chelsea has been head down for 6 weeks and is so snug in there it will
be quite a trick if she turns. I have had the cramping for about 2
weeks now and seem to get them mostly at night, but also on and off
during the day. They feel like menstrual cramps and not really like
Braxton contractions.
We are still doing our twice weekly trips to the hospital for
non-stress testing and she is doing wonderful. Seems like the older
she gets that her readings on the fetal heart monitoring get better
and better. We also eat before the test and she hasn't had to be
nuked with the tazer gun again except for the one time....yeah (I hate
that thing!)
Looks like alot of us are gonna have a happy Mothers day!
Thinking of all of you and wishing you the best of Labor Days!
..Lori
(Due May 13)
|
48.19 | Crazy idea to turn baby | NIMBUS::HARRISON | Icecreamoholic | Wed Apr 22 1992 21:50 | 7 |
| One of the couples in our childbirth class had heard that, if you play
music for the baby, down low, the baby will turn towards the music. It
sounds insane, but they tried it, and it worked.
Cause and effect? Who knows ...
Leslie
|
48.20 | breech | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Thu Apr 23 1992 09:52 | 29 |
| RE: Breech baby
At my ultrasound at 28 weeks the baby was breech - head up and legs up
with butt low down. The Dr said that since this is my second baby the
chances of the baby turning around are quite large and the baby can
decide to turn around even at the last minute. This is specifically
because it is our second. Now at subsequent Dr's visits she has trie to
poke at my belly to find out if the baby has turned but my belly
muscles are so strong that she has difficulty exacting the position.
She says that she feels that the baby has turned but not completely
sure.
Her strategy is to wait until about 36-37 weeks and if at that point if
poking my belly does not tell her the baby's position she will do a
quick ultrasound to check the position. If we would like she will try
the physical (external) manipulation - she will try to move the baby
around physically by pushing on my belly.
I have heard mixed reviews about the physical manipulation since (1) it
could be painful if the Dr does not have gentle hands (2) the bay could
flip back around even after all that. So I am not sure what I want to
do - I am waiting to cross the bridge when I come to it.
All I know is that I do not want to wait until I have been in labor for
eternity and then have a C-section if the baby is breech. I still have
3 weeks to decide ( I am at 33 weeks so the Dr won't check for 3 more
weeks).
Shaila
|
48.21 | | ICS::DOWD | | Thu Apr 23 1992 11:19 | 21 |
| First...Hello Lori, I'm so glad you and Chelsea are doing well. Hugs
to both you and Glen.
I had the same pain too. About two weeks before I delivered Thomas. I
told the doctor. The testing revealed no contractions so the doctor
said it was probably the baby lying low and pushing against a nerve
or something. It got really bad on Sat. night 11/23/92 at about
7:00pm, and then stopped. But...my mucus plug broke at midnight and
Thomas was born at 7:25pm on the 24th, so.....
I can only offer advice on what helped me when I had these pains and
believe it or not, walking was the only thing that helped. But, when
your that far along and uncomfortable, you'll do ANTHING to get
comfortable.
Gosh, I feel like such a old pro now, offering advice to expectant
mothers!
Karen
|
48.22 | anyone for 19 May (or 20, or 21...;-) ) | STUDIO::KUDLICH | nathan's mom | Thu Apr 23 1992 14:17 | 8 |
| Another happy mother's day, I'm due 19 May, but my instincts tell me we
could get into june before this baby decides to show up. She's in
position, but not dropped, and I'm not having major discomfort, except
due to the abrupt change from winter to summer----I'm HHHHHHOOOOTTTTT!
Sure is a lot of us going in 3 to 6 weeks!
Adrienne
|
48.23 | | CSOA1::ZACK | | Thu Apr 23 1992 14:25 | 7 |
| RE: BREECH BABY
My baby was transverse (sideways) breech up until 36 wks. She did
finally turn and unbelievable I didn't even notice.
Angie
|
48.24 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | The Son reigns! | Thu Apr 23 1992 14:38 | 6 |
|
So, have any of you "May mothers" dropped yet ? I forget what
the timeframe is...
Karen, nearly 36 weeks
|
48.25 | how do you know you've dropped | ASIC::MYERS | | Thu Apr 23 1992 15:02 | 9 |
| How do you know when you've dropped? Do you just wake up one morning
and say "Boy, I've dropped" or is it gradual?
I don't feel like I've dropped at all, the baby is still having the
time of it's life under my rib cage, but I'm feeling lots of pressure
and cramping below. My husband says I'm definitely still up there but I'm
constantly talking to people who tell me how much I've dropped.
Susan (24 more days...maybe)
|
48.26 | | HYEND::C_DENOPOULOS | Parking Lot Flyer!! | Thu Apr 23 1992 16:01 | 9 |
|
Hi Susan. Long time no see. Hmm, How do you know you've dropped?
Well, from my wife's experience, EVERYONE WILL TELL YOU!! :^)
"BOY, You DROPPED!!" You'll hear it a hundred times in one day!
Chris D.
p.s. Congrat's Sue.
|
48.27 | Could of fooled me! | ASIC::MYERS | | Thu Apr 23 1992 16:15 | 8 |
| Hi Chris, yes, it's been awhile, I try to stay away from that group,
I'm sure you know what I mean 8^) , but I do keep in touch with a few
people.
I guess I've dropped then, I've been hearing it alot. A surprise to
me, for sure.
Susan
|
48.28 | dropped? | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Thu Apr 23 1992 16:37 | 36 |
| Nope, I don't think so -- a good way to measure (this is my guess)
would be to lean forward when you are in a chair, if you're still
short of breath (huff, puff) then baby's still up there....(I could
be wrong...) "What to expect when you're expecting" says that on the
average, women who are pregnant for the first time will often feel this
drop, while women in subsequent pregnancies on the average don't really
drop until delivery. Of course, they note, that there are plenty of
exceptions in either case.
Re: Horse -- sure looks like a human baby in the ultrasound! 8-)
Re: turning -- having had this discussion with the doc - she said that
it all depends on how much room the baby still has. She doubts that
mine will turn at this point, since baby seems quite large.
A friend of mine who had her first in February (I announced it in
the last volume) had the baby's head down from the 30th week on,
but, just at delivery (unbeknownst to staff and mother) three weeks
early, the baby was transverse breech!
I recall in the last volume we had a lengthy discussion about
the external manipulation method (after reading THOSE notes I don't
want to experience that). Perhaps someone can recall where the
discussion was?
RE: lower pains - glad I am not the only one who gets 'em. Didn't
realize they were that common. They were really pretty fierce this
morning although I think they were partially gas (hard to tell).
Each time I moan and rub my middle, I have to tell my husband
(who, having heard me has this strange look on his face) "Not
contractions, dear!" He told me I am not allowed to deliver this
week since his boss is away on vacation and he is in charge.
I only have one more day in which I have to "keep my legs crossed" 8-)
Monica
|
48.29 | Them Babies Sure Do Grow In The Last Weeks! | NEWPRT::SZAFIRSKI_LO | IVF...I'm Very Fertile! | Fri Apr 24 1992 02:50 | 31 |
| Well we went in for our 37 week check up this morning and got quite a
surprise. Three weeks ago I asked my doc to estimate the size of
Chelsea and he guesstimated around 5-1/2 to 6 pounds. Well this
morning he was amazed at how much I was "all baby" and said that if
I carry to term she could easily be 8-1/2 to 9 pounds.
Being a first time mom-to-be, I really had no idea how much babies can
gain in the last weeks of pregnancy. My doctor said it can easily be
up to 1/2 pound a week. I have put on 26 pounds and am on the short
side (5'2").
Now all this is just fine, cuz from the looks of her growth she is
a thriving little girl who obviously has enjoyed her mother's many
meals of surf and turf. Its just that my doctor mentioned a possible
c-section because of her size, probably due to the fact that I have
had 4 major abdominal surgeries and he is concerned about the stress
on me...and I am sure that he is also wanting to make her delivery
as stress free as possible.
Its just that when I think of having a c-section I feel so let down.
I know in my heart the ultimate goal is to have a healthy baby and
a good delivery for both mother and child.....but I have been so
hyped up on experiencing every piece of this pregancy and that includes
water breaking.....whopper contractions and a vaginal delivery. I know
nothnig has been decided for sure and I need to just stay in today, but
every time I think of having to go c-section I feel so depressed.
Needed to ramble....thanks.
..Lori
|
48.30 | Size and dropping. | MLTVAX::HUSTON | Chris's Mom! | Fri Apr 24 1992 12:13 | 13 |
| Doctors always give you an estimate of how big the baby is, but it
is just a guess. They don't really know for sure how big the baby is.
They are just telling you the average. 4 weeks before my first was born
my doctor told me he was 7 lbs and would probably be well over 8 by
the time I delivered. He ended up being 7 lbs 11 ozs, which was perfect
for me. He was on time too.
About dropping, I am 36 weeks along, and I have alot of people telling
me I've dropped. I feel I have too. Could this mean I'll be delivering
early? I kind of hope so!!! Looking forward to it.
-Sheila
|
48.31 | this morning's check | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Fri Apr 24 1992 13:56 | 10 |
| Had my weekly ultrasound and NonStress Test; baby's fine and
dandy.
The head is really low now (explains all the pain in the area of
the cervix) and their estimation for present weight (based on
circumference of head, torso and length of thigh bone) is just
over 7 pounds. (3 weeks to go though....)
Got to see baby's smiling face!
I can't wait!
Monica
|
48.32 | I love your updates | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Fri Apr 24 1992 14:18 | 7 |
| Good for you, Monica!
With this kind of news I get to smile too.
Have a wonderful weekend...
judy
|
48.33 | just guessing... | PAMSIC::POPP | Deep in the Heart... | Fri Apr 24 1992 16:39 | 12 |
|
Right before I had Tori I asked the doctor how big he thought the baby
was and he felt around and guess her to be at least 8 lbs. Also all of
the labor nurses told me I was going to have a big one, but she came out
6 lb 8 oz. Boy where they wrong! If the doctor insisted on a C-section
due to baby size I would insist on a sonogram to be sure the baby really
is as big as he thinks. Especially since its just a guess. Tori was
21 inches long so she was long she just wasn't real fat. I'm told I came
out the same way.
Lisa
|
48.34 | Don't listen to them | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Mon Apr 27 1992 09:07 | 29 |
|
Re .29 Lori
PLEASE don't let your dr's get you all worked up about having to have a
c-section due to their estimation (visual) of the size of your baby. I
made the same mistake. All the dr's in my OB's office said I was going
to have a big baby, and my OB kept telling me they may have to schedule
a c-sec. My biggest question was "why can't I try to deliver, and if
I can't deliver due to size (I am a large framed woman) then we could
consider c-sec?". They would say it would be less stress on me and the
baby etc...
The DAY before Michael was born they were telling me all of this, had
me scheduled for an ultrasound to determine size (the only exact way
they can measure at this time) the following Monday, etc... They said
the baby was approximately 8-9 lbs already and if I went to term the
c-sec could be necessary (2-weeks)....
Needless to say, Michael was born the very next day at 6lbs, 14oz!
He was long for his weight 20.5 ", but not a "big baby" as they said.
I had 13 hrs of labor, and only 4 hours spent at the hospital. 3-4
pushes and he came right out.
So...as everyone else says, ask for an ultrasound to determine size
before agreeing to a scheduled c-sec.
Good luck!
Chris
|
48.35 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Mon Apr 27 1992 10:09 | 32 |
|
Other side of the story here,
They kept telling me that my baby was going to be big but around 8
pounds, even when I had an ultrasound a few days before he was born.
(the weight estimation kept going up and down).
It wasn't until labor was well under way (about 14 hours into it)
that they revised their estimation to 10 pounds. He came out at 9.11.(
and he also had a bowel movement on the way out and so I wonder if he
would have made it to 10 pounds had that not happened). I did not have
a C-section (but did come oh so close).
Moral of the story? No one knows what is going to happen until it
happens. if you need a C-section, you need a C-section (what are you
going to say no?).
I think that a lot of disservice is done to women by glorifying
labor and delivery and making them think that if they do *anything*
(take drugs, have an epidural, not like it) that they are somehow not
good people and are not doing the *natural* thing.
Hang in there, you're almost at the end. Best thing you can do is
prepare yourself *if* you do have a C-section (can you move things
downstairs?). But don't worry about it until it's here.
By the way, time is a great teacher, I had these *exact* same
concerns when they started telling me I might have a have a C-section,
it's all in the previous parenting notes file. Probably good for a
laugh. ;-)
Wendy
|
48.36 | He was big, but I stretched..... | FUZZLE::ANDERSON | There's no such place as far away | Mon Apr 27 1992 10:43 | 19 |
| Here's another side..........
When I asked my Dr how big the baby was, at about 39 weeks, he looked
at my husband, who's 6'+ and broad shouldered, looked at me, about 5'8,
looking very much like mama house, and said, "Well, he's going to be a
good sized baby" He thought the baby would be about 7-8+ pounds.
When I finally delivered 2 weeks late, my dr and all the nurses were
taking bets on how big he was. The highest bet was 9 pounds. Russell
weighed in at 10 pounds, 4 oz, and 22 inches long. Big was right.
By the way, I'm tall, but pretty thin. If someone had said to me that
I was going to have that big of a baby naturally, I'd have told them
they were crazy. It all depends on how you're built inside, and just
how much you can stretch. I was lucky, I stretched with room to spare.
But I was also half expecting to have a C-section. I'm not sure a Dr
can tell until you actually try to deliver the first time.
marianne
|
48.37 | Ultrasound Scheduled For Tomorrow | NEWPRT::SZAFIRSKI_LO | IVF...I'm Very Fertile! | Mon Apr 27 1992 13:52 | 46 |
| Well I'm scheduled for a full ultrasound tomorrow. On Thursday I go in
for my 38 week appointment and should have a better idea of the plan of
action. I think my doctors concerns are mostly around my previous
history, which includes 4 major abdominal surgeries. I plan on
questioning him extensively when I go in on Thursday. Bottom line is
I want whats best for Chelsea and me, so we have a safe delivery.
I agree with Wendy that to much is placed on natural delivery. I know
for myself that the minute I heard about the possibility of a c-section
I went into a good depression, topped off with lots of anger, guilt,
and feelings of failure. From what I've read this is all very natural,
but I would like to get my focus off the importance of how Chelsea
comes into the world, as long as she comes safely.
Considering we did IVF and I had no concerns how to get me pregnant,
natural or high tech 90's, you would think natural or c-section would
be the least of my concerns. But I have learned during pregnancy that
there are more questions and feelings unknown until you experience them
yourself.
Thank you for sharing all your experiences, it really helps to hear
other real life stories.
I trust my doctor, he's been my Gyn for 14 years and he is wonderful.
I know he will make the best choice with me and Chelsea in mind.
I can't believe its getting so close...I'm so excited!
Also today is my first day off of work.....YAHOOOOO! Its so nice to be
home and not having had to get up and shower..shave...and shine, fight
the crowded freeways and have people at work say to me "You haven't had
that baby yet!"
Will let you know what the estimate on the ultrasound says.
How are all of you other May Moms doing? Still having them cramps, I
am for sure...they seem to increase with every day. Also entered the
stage of being wired constantly. Want to nap, but no can do. Been
cleaning junk drawers until midnight. Think I could take some of this
energy and scrub the toilet...no way, my nesting would rather rearrange
all the vegetable and soup cans in the food pantry!
Good Luck....and again thanks!
..Lori
|
48.38 | 4 weeks left!!! | MLTVAX::HUSTON | Chris's Mom! | Mon Apr 27 1992 15:29 | 16 |
| Lori,
Nesting already huh?!!! I never had that feeling with Chris.
I went for my 36 week checkup this morning and everything is going
fine. The baby's head is very low, which I thought was the case this
weekend already. Lots of cramps and pressure on that bladder!!
Maybe I will go early. It would be kind of nice. We'll see. I am
looking forward to having some time off from work though. Two more
weeks to go, and then I can stay home too!!!
Good luck with your ultrasound tomorrow!
-Sheila (Due May 26th)
|
48.39 | still waiting for energy... | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Tue Apr 28 1992 11:07 | 13 |
| Me, I am still waiting for that burst of energy; no trouble napping
(could do it all day if I wanted to).
Yes, the lower abdominal pain is still there, and seems to get
worse at night. Husband is getting concerned with all the funny
faces I am making lately.....8-)
Hmmm... nesting. Doesn't that come just before delivery - nature's
way of sending you a little more energy for the labour to come?
Don't wear yourself out!
Good luck!
Monica
|
48.40 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Tue Apr 28 1992 11:33 | 6 |
| Nesting - ha I never had it with either kid! Don't think I've EVER had
it since either! Wouldn't mind getting it though - spring cleaning
time is here....
-sandy
|
48.41 | Nesting for sure! | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Tue Apr 28 1992 11:35 | 9 |
|
I had the nesting instinct bigtime right near the end of my pregnancy.
Was constantly picking up everything all over the house, rearranging
cabinets, etc... My husband used to have a real chuckle over it.
Can't wait to hear all the good news on all of these new babies due!
Chris
|
48.42 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | The Son reigns! | Tue Apr 28 1992 13:54 | 7 |
|
Well, I'm hoping the nesting instinct hits hard during my
time off (before the baby). I doubt I'll ever find time
to get my sweaters sorted and put away otherwise :-)
Karen
|
48.43 | Nesting in the shower | CSOA1::ZACK | | Tue Apr 28 1992 13:57 | 8 |
| I had a strong nesting urge before my first was born, I found myself
on my hands and knees scrubbing the shower with a tooth brush two weeks
before she was born.
With my second I got the urge the day I went into labor but not with
the same severity as with #1.
Angie
|
48.44 | | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Just another tricky day | Wed Apr 29 1992 14:05 | 9 |
| I also had the nesting urge. I found myself rearranging the nursery
every other day, I laugh now when I picture myself folding the baby's
clothes over and over and over! Also, scrubbing the bathroom was
another task I would do constantly. The day I went into labor I was out
most of the day driving from store to store, the shopping instinct I
guess, then again you don't need to be pregnant to feel like doing
that! HAHA!
Sandy
|
48.45 | slow nesting | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Wed Apr 29 1992 14:36 | 23 |
| Since I've been home for a few weeks now, I've been taking my time
tidying things up (don't enjoy scrubbing much, but I do like putting
everything where it belongs). So I would not consider it nesting so
much as battening down the hatches and bracing my home 8-) 8-).
Saw the doc this morning, and although Alan thinks I have indeed
dropped, the doc says cervix soft but still closed, baby's head
still floating. She discussed the possibility to induce on the 9th
(a week early), but the choice in the end was mine. Next thursday
she will have her back-up in to meet me, and the two will decide
if it should be done.
(two reasons: our anxiety at having to wait any longer, and doc's
ability to do the delivery, since as of the 11th, she's on
leave so that she can rest for the twins she's carrying).
What a month!
Anyway, Alan is starting to have that "oh my god, fatherhood"
basketcase look, and doesn't think he will be getting much done
at work till the time comes. Me, I'm just trying not to aggrevate my
back and not waddle around too much. I'm SO awkward.
Back to the needlepoint (just learned how to do it.)
Monica
|
48.46 | Ultrasound Results | NEWPRT::SZAFIRSKI_LO | IVF...I'm Very Fertile! | Wed Apr 29 1992 19:43 | 26 |
| Well I had the full ultrasound and to be honest its such a wide
estimate range, I don't really feel like I know much more than when I
started out. They said that they give you an estimate, also a low and
high range. The estimate was 7-1/2 as of yesterday...6 on the low and
8 on the high. My original due date is the 13th and now they are
saying the 9th....Monica, looks like we could be going in at the same
time! I will also know more tomorrow when I see my doc and hopefully
will have my first internal and see if anything is happening that we
don't know about.
I'm not much for scrubbing when it comes to nesting, but am definately
into the organizational mode. Its really nice to get those 5 year old
junk drawers cleaned out! Glenn thought I was crazy when I told him
I was going to wash her clothes again (washed them three weeks ago).
I told him that they are getting dusty and he just laughed at the idea
that the clothes sitting in her brand new dresser could actually be
collecting dust! Oh how the mind works overtime!
My hands are so swollen I can barely bend them. Doc is not concerned
cuz my blood pressure is great, just have symptomatic rhumatory (sp?)
arthritis....I told him I have Farmer John Sausage Fingers and my feet
look like walrus paddles!
Can't wait to see what the doc says tomorrow!
....Lori
|
48.47 | turning baby is dangerous | GIDDAY::ROWED | | Fri May 01 1992 03:06 | 13 |
| I had my baby by cesarean (c-section) as he was a transverse breech.
He was in this position from week 28 and although he changed regularly
(several times a day) up until week 41.5, at the last moment he was
still in transverse breech. I was not given a choice about a normal
delivery by my doctor - she said it was not safe.
Also, I asked her about turning my baby and when told there was a 1%
chance of death, there was no way! Apparently, the baby is in that
position for a reason and the turning can wrap the cord around the baby's
throat and cut off the air supply.
Deb
|
48.48 | Changing doctors in 9th month? | WFOV12::MOKRAY | | Mon May 04 1992 11:20 | 14 |
| Has anyone had experience in changing doctors in the last month or two?
I've been having long conversations with the practice I'm with, which
was great when it was simply gynecology. Their view related to
collaboration between patient and doctor is that any problems are all
my fault, no one else but me has ever complained about anything, they
know they've done their absolute best and they feel they've already
talked to me enough. Not exactly the best set of answers if one wants
to break out of the fear/tension/pain cycle.
Anyhow, I'm seeking to move and just wondered if anyone had had this
experience. Will other doctors just consider you another hysteric? Or
can they see that these things can happen? It's week 36 now and I want
to get this resolved before I go to a Thursday appointment to see if
the baby's still breech.
|
48.49 | My step daughter did this | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Mon May 04 1992 11:35 | 11 |
| My step-daughter did this, mainly because her husband wanted her to have a
female gynecologist rather than a male one (no flames, please, that was their
problem but he is a strict fundamentalist Muslim). Anyway, I think the change
was for the better (she changed in the 35th week) because they didn't have
confidence in the doctor they had and felt that he was over doing the
ultrasounds and causing them additional expense.
I can't imagine going into delivery with a doctor I didn't trust. But make
sure you get it right this time; you don't have much time for another change :-)
ccb
|
48.50 | whatever YOU decide | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Mon May 04 1992 16:58 | 12 |
| You deserve the best for yourself and your child -- if the
folk you are dealing with presently do not make you happy,
find someone who will. I am sure there are a number of recommendations
friends, family or co-workers could make for you. It will not be as
smooth perhaps, as staying with the same practitioner, but records
could be transferred.
Be brave and do what you must to make yourself happy. You'll not
regret it if and when you find someone that will have your confidence!
Let us know how it turns out!
Monica
|
48.51 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | The Son reigns! | Mon May 04 1992 18:21 | 4 |
|
So May moms, does everyone have her suitcase packed ?
Karen, who hasn't sent in her hospital admission forms yet...
|
48.52 | go ahead | SAHQ::HERNDON | Kristen, SOR, 385-2683 | Tue May 05 1992 09:44 | 11 |
| I changed doc's at 37 weeks. My doc left the practice so I had
no choice.
I actually liked the new one better but I delivered at 39 weeks
so I didn't get to deal with him too much.
I say go for it!
Won't be much longer anyways and you will probably feel better!
Kristen
|
48.53 | For the Most Part....Ready to Go! | NEWPRT::SZAFIRSKI_LO | IVF...I'm Very Fertile! | Tue May 05 1992 15:15 | 17 |
| Suitcase is packed for Mom and Chelsea...Coach's bag needs a little bit
of work on it! Only took Glenn half the night to figure out how to
program the cheap stopwatch I picked up from the drug store!
I've been putting together a Coach's gift pack for Glenn...kinda been
a project over the last couple of months. Wrapping little gifts and
picking up some of his favorite shoes and clothes. So much of the
attention is on the baby and daddy has been so great these last 39
weeks that its nice to surprise and spoil him.
Anybody have any new symptoms...besides unmeasurable excitment!
Still lots of cramping and more Braxton Hicks...a little bit of new
lower back/butt pain...the not knowing when she will decide to come
is driving me nuts...I want to hold her soooo bad!!
....Lori
|
48.54 | | CNTROL::STOLICNY | | Tue May 05 1992 15:19 | 7 |
|
Don't forget to pack a nice bottle of champagne, ladies! It's
a nice treat after the big event.
Good luck!
Carol
|
48.55 | CHAMPAGNE IN THE HOSPITAL! | GENRAL::MARZULLA | | Tue May 05 1992 16:25 | 7 |
| When Carol said don't forget to pack the champagne I laughed out loud because
it reminded me of a funny story! The new parents were treated to a nice steak
dinner with candlelight, cloth napkins and champagne. Well - I thoroughly
enjoyed the champagne so much and having missed alcohol for the last 9 months
that I had two little glassess and the next thing I knew I was giggling and
acting silly and was basically blown! My husband cut me off. Was a fond
memory of that evening.
|
48.56 | Good luck to you all! | CLT::KOBAL::CJOHNSON | Eat, drink and see Jerry! | Tue May 05 1992 16:53 | 11 |
|
Best of luck to all you expectant mothers.
I was packed at 34 weeks (pre-term labor scare) and
didn't deliver til' 42 weeks!
Boy was I glad to get that 10lb 22 1/2 inch monster out of me! :)
And to think that I want to do it again?! I think the percocets
haven't worn off yet ;-)
-Chris
|
48.57 | Champagne?!? | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Wed May 06 1992 11:00 | 23 |
| Alan was reading the part about "after the delivery" in the
What to Expect book to me last night. We both had a good laugh about
the champagne -- "Oh good" I said hearing this about sipping bubbly
after x hours of hard labour "just what I need after loosing
blood and having various chemistry in me - a good chance to get
drunk and have a migraine!"
Nix the booze for me.
I got it so that I can finish packing in about 5 - 10 minutes. All
instructions for Alan have been written out and reviewed (He
has a list that tells him who to phone and their phone numbers, who
to E-mail, and what to do with the paperwork that the doctor needs to
fill out so that we get paid during my leave and what to do to finish
the home-made birth announcements). Now, Have I forgotten anything?
(I'm starting to walk around in tight little circles trying to answer
this question).
I just CAN'T WAIT.
Not to mention just a tad apprehensive about getting that babe out
of me without doing it any harm.
Monica
(scared and excited!)
|
48.58 | Champagne!!! | CSLALL::LMURPHY | | Thu May 07 1992 10:40 | 10 |
| I delivered Lindsay at 6:22 a.m. We celebrated with my parents and
Mamosas.......after my parents left, the nurse went to get me up and
moving....i fainted.....i would say it was a combination of the
heat (they had turned up readying for the baby....and neglected to
turn back down!!!!), the loss of alot of blood, the stress of being up
all night and what i went through........BUT boy those nurses teased me
about passing out drunk!! I think I had one glass....if that...who
remembers!!
|
48.59 | | HYEND::C_DENOPOULOS | Parking Lot Flyer!! | Thu May 07 1992 10:56 | 4 |
| Do hospitals still serve a dinner for the parents when it's time to go
home after childbirth?? I know they used to.
Chris D.
|
48.60 | They also have a McDonalds run at 7pm - FREE! | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Thu May 07 1992 13:30 | 13 |
|
Leominster Hospital served a very nice dinner to my husband and I the
night before I went home. It was served in the dining room, with a
carafe of wine, linen napkins, etc, and a pretty nice piece of steak!
Cheesecake (yum!) for dessert! Candlelight and all!
It was wonderful!
My husband still teases me about the fact that I sent him back up the
room for my "doughnut" because I couldn't sit in the regular wooden
chairs and still concetrate on eating. :-)
Chris
|
48.61 | 39 Weeks!! | NEWPRT::SZAFIRSKI_LO | IVF...I'm Very Fertile! | Fri May 08 1992 01:14 | 13 |
| Well went in for my 39 week appointment and things are looking good.
Had my first internal (oh joy!) and doc said I was 50% effaced and
dialated to 1. Guess this doesn't really mean anything is gonna happen
real soon, but it sure was exciting to know something is happening down
there...all those cramps have to be for something!
How is everybody else doing?
Was hoping to be holding Chelsea Rose on Mothers Day....its hard to
be patient at this stage....guess I will just have to rock my belly
in my hands...unless something happens in the next couple of days.
..Lori
|
48.62 | Last day of work!!! | MLTVAX::HUSTON | Chris's Mom! | Fri May 08 1992 10:51 | 15 |
| Today is my last day of work, and I am so excited about this baby. I
can't wait, but I can because I still have alot of stuff to do at
home to get ready. My husband asked me yesterday when I was going to
pack my bag. I haven't even thought of it yet, with being busy with
work, and finishing up my Masters Degree.
This weekend I will have to start getting ready. I realized after
reading the note about essentials to buy that I need to buy nursing
pads too. I forgot all about them, thank god, I saw that note!
Good luck to all you other mother's close to delivery. Everything will
go fine!!!
-Sheila (38 weeks!)
|
48.63 | Attn: May Moms to be | CSOA1::ZACK | | Fri May 08 1992 12:42 | 5 |
| I read somewhere (I can't remember where, sorry) That Kodak is offering
a free Star Camara outfit to any mothers delivering a baby on Mothers
Day. I will try to find the article I read this in.
Angie
|
48.64 | timing | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Fri May 08 1992 16:02 | 11 |
| Gee, that's nice of Kodak - how do they know - go up to any
Kodak counter with baby's birth certificate?
Okay, I thought I'd keep this to myself and surprise everyone. But
I am just bursting with anticipation.
I get induced tomorrow. 8-) 8-).
Now there is a chance they'll not succeed and send me home but......
Monica
|
48.65 | Good luck! | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Fri May 08 1992 16:24 | 7 |
| Monica,
Good luck with the delivery. I bet you are excited. Keep us posted.
Shaila
4_weeks_to_go_and_waddling_for_sure :-)
|
48.66 | I'll be thinking about you. | CSOA1::ZACK | | Fri May 08 1992 16:42 | 14 |
| Monica,
The article I read did say that you have to mail a copy of the baby's
birth certificate to Kodak. (I promise I will look for it this
weekend just in case you have the baby Sunday.)
Good luck!!!.
Angie
(P.S) Try to get some sleep, I could not sleep the night before my
baby was induced. I was way too excited.
|
48.67 | DO YOU HAVE A LAPTOP...can't wait to hear! | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Fri May 08 1992 17:02 | 10 |
| Good luck, Monica. My neighbor was induced on Monday (with a pit drip
that was going all day) and she finally went into labor THURSDAY
afternoon!!!!
Just wanted to make your weekend!!
But then again, I had pit (while in labor) and the kid was out in 2
hrs.
-sandy
|
48.68 | Happy Day to You! | NEWPRT::SZAFIRSKI_LO | IVF...I'm Very Fertile! | Sat May 09 1992 00:30 | 3 |
| Will be thinking of you Monica...wishing you the best of luck!!
...Lori
|
48.69 | Good thoughts your way ! | DPDMAI::CAMPAGNA | Lee Ann DTN 483-4297 | Sat May 09 1992 11:43 | 9 |
| Monica,
Good, good luck - maybe you are in labor as I type............
Positive vibrations to you all !
Lee Ann
|
48.70 | Sarah Olivia Myers, May 2nd | ASIC::MYERS | | Sat May 09 1992 18:04 | 20 |
| I guess I'm the first May mom to go! I was due on May 17th (last day
of work was May 1) and Sarah Olivia Myers decided that she had waited
long enough and was born at 4:07 pm on Saturday, May 2nd.
I was extremely lucky with my labor, I started with what I thought were
gas pains at 4am, arrived at the hospital at 10:30 (an hours ride!!!)
and was already 4 1/2 cm dilated and 100% effaced. Had a shot of
nubane at 1:00 when I was 7 cm dilated and at 3:15 I was 10 cm dilated
and was told to start pushing. I was delighted that it went so easily
for me. My husband was GREAT and a wonderful inspiration.
It's been a week and I"m starting to get my strength back. I love
being a mom and Sarah is just an awesome baby. I couldn't imagine a
better daughter and she's absolutely gorgeous, too (what, me,
biased??).
Good luck to the rest of the May moms. May your labors be easy and you
enjoy your babies as much as I'm enjoying mine!!!
Susan
|
48.71 | Changed drs! Now tell me about spinals. | WFOV11::MOKRAY | | Mon May 11 1992 11:03 | 27 |
| Changing doctors turned out to be easier than one could have known,
even at 36 weeks. I had found one group who had accept me, on the
basis of a phone call, but I was holding out for this one man who
delivers the doctors' wives at the hospital I wanted, Baystate. His
office also agreed on the phone and I saw him this last Friday. He
started from what I think is the right point -- could he help me get
back together with my old group. We determined I couldn't and he
accepted me. His manner was a welcome relief -- straight talking,
direct, assumed I wasn't a dummy, etc.
He gave me the reasons why he didn't think it was a good idea to try to
turn the baby from being breech, all ofwhich made sense. He also
connected some previous old info from my file, related to a uterine
septum which had been removed, that this had a bearing on the lie of
the baby. Made sense.
Anyhow, the C-section is scheduled for May 28. Hard to believe there
are only two more weekends before Nathaniel comes. It was both a
pleasure and difficult to have Sunday mostly to myself, with Daniela
off to a birthday party. I think she's beginning to realize too that
her days of being an only child are also numbered. She woke up Sunday
morning saying "baby brother, baby brother".
Any advice from anyone on the relative benefits of doing epidural over
spinal for a C-section? I had thought that epidural was enough but
doctor mentioned spinal. I'll question him more this Thursday, but
experiences would be useful. Thanks!
|
48.72 | | HYEND::C_DENOPOULOS | Parking Lot Flyer!! | Mon May 11 1992 11:05 | 4 |
|
CONGRAT'S Susan!!!! Glad to hear everything went well.
Chris D.
|
48.73 | we had an epidural | CRONIC::ORTH | | Mon May 11 1992 15:00 | 21 |
| re. .71
My wife had an epidural for her C-section. It was plenty adequate for
pain coverage. They were 3/4 done with the incisions and nearly ready
to take out Jacob, when she asked if they'd started yet! She couldn't
feel an single thing. She had had epidurals with labor with both our
second and third children, and she commented that the epidural for the
section was "heavier". The anesthesiologist confirmed this, saying it
is a larger dose than when in normal labor. She was able to move well
within about 1 - 1.5 hours after the surgery (as well as you can after
a C-section!).
Spinals are more "involved". You are numb higher up (from about
mid-chest as opposed to below the waist with an epi), may feel as if
you can't breathe (although you *can*... it just *feels* as if you
can't), and must usually lie flat for a number of hours to avoid a
"spinal headache".
Personally, I'd opt for the lesser meds, if your dr. will allow it.
--dave--
|
48.74 | May baby arrives in April!! | MARVIN::MARSH | The dolphins have the answer | Tue May 12 1992 14:19 | 24 |
|
Another May mum delivers early!!
I was due on May 8th, but at my 37 week check-up we found out the baby
was transverse breech and my pelvis was too small to even try labour.
So I had a C-section under epidural on April the 29th and Rebecca Kate
was lifted out at 12 noon!!
The birth was fine and I am healing well. They do 7-10 C-sections under
epidural at the John Radcliffe in Oxford per day, so they did a very
neat job of the scar.
We are getting used to life at home - we came home when Rebecca was 4
days old and I certainly don't feel I have missed anything by not
having a full labour and vaginal birth. I have a healthy beautiful
baby, that's all that matters!!
Readers from the last volume of these notes may remember I was
exercising right up until week 36. Well I am not allowed to do any
aerobics until 6 weeks after the birth. Guess I'll just enjoy the rest!
Celia
|
48.75 | Another May Mom! | NEWPRT::SZAFIRSKI_LO | IVF...I'm Very Fertile! | Fri May 22 1992 14:24 | 36 |
| Chelsea Rose was born on Tuesday, May 12th!
7lbs...12oz.....20"......9:06pm.
Mom had one of those wonderful labors that she will never forget.
After twenty five hours at home waiting for contractions to get five
minutes apart...which they never did, more like 10 and 4 and 6 and 2
and 8....we went to the hospital Tuesday morning at 6:00am. I was
dialated to 5 and 100% effaced. We took the epidural immediately!!
I was so pooped out from not having any sleep that I just couldn't
handle the contractions anymore. We spent another 14 hours trying to
get her to come down and had no luck. We dialated up to 8, my bag of
waters burst and we shrunk back down to 6.
The doctor thought my pelvic area was to small for her, which was part
of the problem. When they took her by c-section at 9:06 (birth time),
they discoverd that the cord was wrapped around her neck once and tight
around her body...she was pretty much harnessed in. Her head had
started to mold but she couldn't make any progress because of the cord.
There were some heart discellerations during the monitoring, but
nothing to cause them any alarm.
Anywho, I am in heaven and this baby girl is the most wonderful gift
we have ever been blessed with. Thank God for IVF and all the other
wonderful procedures that help infertile women bring children into
their life!
We wondered if they could have mixed up the petri dishes, but her daddy
has an unmistakable dimple in the middle of his chin...Chelsea Rose has
a dimple too!!
Congrats to all the other May moms who have had their babies and to
those who will be delivering very soon!
...Lori
|
48.76 | | GRANPA::CSACRA | | Fri May 22 1992 14:30 | 6 |
| Lori,
I have been waiting for this note. CONGRATULATIONS!!!! You give me
hope.
Cathryn
|
48.77 | | DPDMAI::CAMPAGNA | Lee Ann DTN 483-4297 | Fri May 22 1992 18:07 | 1 |
| WELCOME CHELSEA ROSE !!!!!!!!!!!
|
48.78 | Congrats | MACNAS::BHARMON | KEEP GOING NO MATTER WHAT | Sat May 23 1992 03:51 | 7 |
| Lori,
Congratulations and good wishes on the birth of your daughter,
Chelsea Rose.
Bernie
|
48.79 | Another May Mom! | MLTVAX::HUSTON | Chris and Kevin's Mom!!!! | Wed May 27 1992 17:16 | 11 |
| Hi,
I'm another May mom that went early. I went on maternity leave May
11th, and Kevin Matthew decided to be born 2 am. on May 13th. He
was due on the 26th, but I was happy to have him early. He weighed
in at 6 lbs, 12 ozs. and was 19 1/2 inches long. He is doing great!
And his big brother Chris loves him very much. He wants to hold
him, and kiss him all the time.
-Sheila
|
48.80 | | DENVER::DORO | | Thu May 28 1992 14:11 | 11 |
|
Congrats!
I go on maternity leave June 10th... and would LIKE to be early, altho,
since we just moved, I have NOTHING ready yet!!
tick tock... watch the clock.
Jamd
|
48.81 | Monica, are you out there? | CTHQ3::KNOTT | | Thu Jun 04 1992 10:27 | 4 |
| Has anyone heard from Monica? She was supposed to be induced May 9th?
Was she? How did it go? It's been weeks and I can't wait to hear!
Monica... I hope you are just too busy to write!
|
48.82 | Monica, Alan and Charlotte are fine! | WILBRY::WASSERMAN | Deb Wasserman, DTN 264-1863 | Thu Jun 04 1992 10:58 | 2 |
| Monica had a girl, right on schedule! There have been a bunch of notes
somewhere congratulating her!
|
48.83 | | POWDML::SATOW | | Thu Jun 04 1992 11:18 | 5 |
| re: .81
see 12.12 et seq.
Clay
|
48.84 | Another May 13th | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Fri Jun 05 1992 09:26 | 10 |
| Re .79
My son Neel was also born on May 13th, at 9:14am. He was 23 days early
and he weighed 6lbs 13oz and was 19.5 inches long.
Looks like we have babies with similar statistics.
Congratulations to all new Moms.
Shaila
|
48.85 | May 28 for Nathaniel | WFOV12::MOKRAY | | Tue Jun 09 1992 09:13 | 10 |
| Nathaniel was born May 28, via c-section, at 7 lbs 2 oz, 19.5 inches.
All doing well, though my next stop is to find notes on breast feeding,
which is not a piece of cake at least for the milk provider (nathaniel
seems happy as a little clam).
Daniela at 2 years 8 months has learned to sing to the baby while
nursing, and to help with the burping. Both of these are preferable to
the early hair pulling. Guess that's another note I need to find or
start -- toddler management while an infant is around.
|
48.86 | "CONGRATULATIONS!!" | SALEM::STIG | | Thu Oct 15 1992 20:15 | 1 |
|
|
48.87 | | TOOK::TOOK::SCAER | Boop-Boop-a-Doop | Tue May 18 1993 14:43 | 11 |
| RE: .28
> I recall in the last volume we had a lengthy discussion about
> the external manipulation method (after reading THOSE notes I don't
> want to experience that). Perhaps someone can recall where the
> discussion was?
How can I find this discussion?
................beth
|
48.88 | pointer | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Tue May 18 1993 14:58 | 2 |
| PARENTING_V3, note 219, "I need my baby to turn"
|
48.89 | Breech birth without caesarian? | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Andy Carter..Morph the Borg | Thu May 27 1993 10:54 | 31 |
| We are 3 weeks away from the due-date now. Helen had an ultra sound on
Monday, the baby is still breech and our hospital has a policy
of no external manipulation to turn it.
The consultant wants to know what we want for the birth. The options are
either go for a caesarian with epidural or full anasthetic,
or go for a trial of labour with an emergency caesarian as back up.
Helen doesn't want (at the moment) to have an epidural, as she once
underwent a lumbar puncturewhich she found most unpleasant. The trouble is,
is that if we go for a trial of labour without epidural, any c-section
would have to be under full anasthetic as there wouldn't be time to
administer the epiduarl. However we've heard that to have an epidural
makes it alot more difficult to know when to push, which potentially
might complicate a vaginal breech birth (and therefore increasing the need
for a c-section etc.)
The baby is average size with an above average (but still 'normal') sized
head. What are the chances of it turning naturally before its due,
and what are the chances of having a sucessful vaginal delivery of a
breech baby?
Above all (obviously) the aim is for a healthy mother and a healthy baby,
but within those parameters, the ideal would be for a vaginal
delivery with pain control other than epidural.
All advice/experience welcome!
Andy (who's a bit worried)
|
48.90 | | TOOK::SCAER | Boop-Boop-a-Doop | Thu May 27 1993 11:03 | 9 |
| RE: .89
> our hospital has a policy
> of no external manipulation to turn it
Is that because they feel it is too risky? Or that
it is of no benefit?
..............................beth
|
48.91 | | ROCK::BERNSTEIN | | Thu May 27 1993 11:10 | 2 |
| Have you explored going to another doctor just for the turning
procedure?
|
48.92 | spa | MSBCS::MIDTTUN | Lisa Midttun,285-3450,NIO/N4,Pole H14-15 | Thu May 27 1993 11:26 | 9 |
| One of my friend had external manipulation done to turn her breach baby
(her first child). She explained that some doctors won't do this
due to the risk of the umbilical cord wrapping around the babies neck.
Also, some babies 'prefer' certain positions and the doctor couldn't
guarantee that, once turned, the baby would stay in the head-down
position. I think she mentioned that some doctor's might make a
distinction with attempting this on a first baby vs. subsequent
pregnancies. Not sure why, but maybe it has something to do with how
maleable the mom's uterus?
|
48.93 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | John 3:16 - Your life depends on it! | Thu May 27 1993 12:11 | 9 |
|
There is an article in the May issue of PARENTS magazine
by a woman who had a successful vaginal delivery of a
breech baby.
The baby was butt-down and engaged, with his legs straight
up in front of him (pike position).
Karen
|
48.94 | It can be done | WHEEL::POMEROY | | Thu May 27 1993 12:33 | 23 |
| This is my concern as well, but I have 2 1/2 more months to go.
Our lamaze instructor told us last night that she has seen
babies that have turned even during labor! She also said
there is no guarantee that the baby will stay turned, if
they successfully turn it.
She advised me that it's harder to deliver a breech baby if it's
a first baby. I will probably not have any trouble since this
is my 3rd and everything has already been stretched out.
She also knew of a woman that had an ultrasound showing a breech
baby and when she came in to the hospital a week later in labor,
the baby had turned and was engaged.
Basically, I was told, don't worry about it until the time comes.
I wouldn't recommend going with an epidural since if there has been
any surgery or anything, there could be some scar tissue that the
epidural won't get to and then if you do end up with a c-section,
that part of the uterus that isn't numb, will be felt!
Good luck!
|
48.95 | | TOOK::SCAER | Boop-Boop-a-Doop | Thu May 27 1993 13:04 | 9 |
|
RE: .92
> One of my friend had external manipulation done to turn her breach baby
> (her first child).
Was it successful?
....................beth
|
48.96 | | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Andy Carter..Morph the Borg | Thu May 27 1993 13:08 | 19 |
| Thanks for your replies.
It is our first baby.
The hospital won't turn babies because they are concerned about risk of
damage (they mentioned bruising).
I don't know how changing doctors for the turning, would fit into the
NHS way of doing things in Britain. I suspect neither the current
doctor (who Helen is very happy with) or the other doctor (who would be used
for the turn but not follow it thru'), would be very happy. And I
suppose we're trusting the hospital for everything else, so we should
take their advice. Still, its worth asking about.
We sometimes get a 'Parents Magazine', I hope its the same as .93
mentioned, as our baby is in the 'pike' position as well.
Hoping it'll turn at the last moment,
Andy
|
48.97 | One success story | MSBCS::MIDTTUN | Lisa Midttun,285-3450,NIO/N4,Pole H14-15 | Thu May 27 1993 13:40 | 6 |
| RE: .95'2 request about whether my friend's external manipulation was
successful...
Yes, my friend's child was successfully turned, stayed in the new
position, and was delivered non-surgically. This was done 8 years ago
at Emerson Hospital in Concord, MA (not sure which OB/GYN).
|
48.98 | does it hurt? | MSBCS::MIDTTUN | Lisa Midttun,285-3450,NIO/N4,Pole H14-15 | Thu May 27 1993 13:47 | 6 |
| Forgot to mention...now that I think about it, I think my friend said
that it hurt quite abit when they did the external manipulation (can't
remember if she described it or I imagined it, but I picture a doctor
and nurse pushing on your pregnant belly). She wasn't a happy camper
that day, but in retrospect, felt good about her decision since it
spared her some surgery.
|
48.99 | try this | POCUS::CUFF | | Thu May 27 1993 14:35 | 16 |
| Our daughter was breech several weeks before due date, our physicians
and hospital do not perform external manipulation. For what it's
worth, our LaMaze instructor (Labor/Delivery RN) suggested I
get down on "all fours" on the floor, then put my head down on
the floor and raise my butt up in the air, twice a day for 15 mins.
Perhaps a coincidence, but she flipped within the week! I distinctly
remember when she did her somersault. Our instructor said she
wouldn't/couldn't guarantee any change in position, but you never
know, wouldn't hurt the baby or me, etc. I have since suggested
the same thing to 3 friends, all of whom followed this and had
babies who flipped.
PS: Went through 24+ hours labor, she never dropped and ended up
with a C anyway! No guarantees, that's for sure, but we tried,
and when all's said and done, we were blessed with a healthy
gorgeous little girl.
|
48.100 | I would question the part about full anaesthesia if trial labor fails | BROKE::NIKIN::BOURQUARD | Deb | Thu May 27 1993 15:06 | 7 |
| I don't understand the reasoning behind "if we go for a trial of labour
without epidural, any c-section would have to be under full anasthetic
as there wouldn't be time to administer the epiduarl."
Unless the baby or mother are in distress, isn't there always time to
administer an epidural?
|
48.101 | ...or a spinal? | MCIS5::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Thu May 27 1993 15:18 | 1 |
|
|
48.102 | | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Thu May 27 1993 15:44 | 30 |
| I was born breech (I think they just didn't know), and came out feet
first. With me I brought a few of my mother's insides, and she had to
have major repair surgery afterwards. She had one more baby, and they
told her that she couldn't carry any more because of all the damage my
birth had caused.
This may be a more "drastic" case, but just to point out a potential
concern.
As for the c-section. I had 2, the first was a spinal, the second an
epidural. I'd opt for the spinal again ANY day. A previous noter
indicates that scar tissue isn't numbed by an epidural - I'd like to
second that notion, as with the epidural and my second delivery, it
sure FELT like I could feel every bit of what was going on!!
If I recall correctly, the spinal took about 10 mins to take affect,
the epidural was a little longer. Also, the needle stays in your back
for the epidural. With a spinal it's one shot then lay still for 12-24
hours. As you can imagine, it's a bit uncomfortable to lay on your
back with a needle in your back at the same time. Being 9 mos pregnant
doesn't help!!
Are you SURE that those are your only 2 options? Maybe if you could
explain your concerns in more detail to your Dr, they could offer
another alternative?
I've also heard that standing on your head will help a baby turn. I
think it was something like 20 mins/day. Of course she's going to need
some help getting up and down (-: (-;
|
48.103 | Epidural worked fine | SWAM1::MATHIEU_PA | | Thu May 27 1993 21:20 | 29 |
|
Well I had an epidural for a C-section, and I had previously had tubal
surgery. The doctors chose to do the incision right on top of the
old one so I would not have 2 scars. They also had to clear a lot of
scar tissue left over from the old surgery. I certainly did not feel
any pain at all, and no one mentioned anything about the epidural not
working on scar tissue. I certainly don't mean to imply that those
noters who
said that they felt pain are liars, but that each individual case is
different, so the best might be to check with the doctor.
Also, epidural only describes the means of administering the
medication, and I believe that there are variation in the "cocktail" of
drugs that they give for pain. So maybe some drugs work better than
others. Mine had something in it that made me terribly itchy over my
face and arms the next day.
My first epidural was during labor, and I too thought that it was very
unpleasant. A month later, I had to have a second one to try and relieve
back pain and
I did not feel a thing. So maybe you can reassure your wife and tell
her that it not always bad. I personally would prefer to go with the
epidural and be awake during delivery than be under full anesthesia,
but it's obviously a personal decision.
Hope this might help,
Patricia.
|
48.104 | | GOOEY::ROLLMAN | | Fri May 28 1993 09:50 | 18 |
|
Elise turned twice during the final two weeks. She
was head down, then turned butt down. I remember it
well; it was a major painful event when she turned.
She didn't fit very well crosswise, and a foot stuck
out against my belly as she moved. I swear you could
count the toes.
At my next midwife appointment, they said not to worry,
if she turned once, she could do it again. And she
did, about a week later. Just as memorable, just as
painful. She then engaged, and stayed that way.
So, I'd say don't worry until the end. That baby may
not be done yet...
Pat
|
48.105 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri May 28 1993 11:54 | 1 |
| I have a friend who's a high risk OB. He often turns breech babies.
|
48.106 | my son was very bruised by the manipulation\ | MEMIT::GIUNTA | | Fri May 28 1993 12:55 | 20 |
| I put a description of my experience with turning in the last version
of parenting, but I'll put another note here. My second twin had been
in the appropriate position for delivery, but folded in half when it
came his turn to be born (sort of a reverse pike position). They tried
internal and external manipulation to get him to unfold since I'd just
had his sister naturally, but it didn't work and they had to take him
by C-section anyhow. I won't go into the graphic details here, but
let's say that even with the epidural which was enough so that I
couldn't feel a thing when I delivered Jessica (including the pushing),
I found the manipulation to be fairly painful. And the end result was
that they couldn't get him to unfold, so they had to deliver him by
section. And the epidural did not take high enough, so I still had
to have general anesthesia on top of the epidural. I can understand
the hospital's concerns around bruising. My son looked like he'd just
gone 5 rounds in the ring as he was very badly bruised. His arms, legs
and body were all black and blue and swollen, and he looked awful.
If I had to do it again, I wouldn't even try the manipulation.
Cathy
|
48.107 | | STROKR::dehahn | ninety eight...don't be late | Fri May 28 1993 14:03 | 14 |
|
Another concern our OB had with external manipulation was having the placenta
detach.
Patrick was breech right up until birth. He 'engaged' butt first. We chose
a 'C' section with an epidural. All went well except my wife had a major
headache as the epidural wore off. Once the IV meds were started it was
forgotten.
Another vote for c-section with epidural. Which takes priority, a healthy
mother and baby or experiencing a vaginal birth? Why take added risks.
Chris
|
48.108 | Placenta rupture | BRAT::FULTZ | DONNA FULTZ | Fri May 28 1993 14:36 | 11 |
|
My girlfriend is in her last days of pregnancy, she is going
to be induced on Monday, She has had a very hight blood
pressure 170/187..
The doctor is very concerned that the placenta will rupture,
Does any one why and how this would happen?
Thanks
|
48.109 | | NEWPRT::NEWELL_JO | Don't wind your toys too tight | Fri May 28 1993 16:28 | 35 |
| RE: epidurals...
I had an epidural for both of my deliveries. Both very different.
The first one was a breeze. No pain or discomfort during or after
the insertion of the needle. In fact I can't believe they actually
left the needle in the back, I didn't feel it either time and I
don't remember them removing it. The only thing that bothered me
was that I couldn't feel anything with my hands during delivery.
When I quizzed the OB about it at my 6 week post-partum checkup,
she almost had a cow. She asked why I didn't mention that my arms
and hands were numb. I told her I didn't know it was a problem.
She said the epidural had spread too high and it could have easily
impaired my breathing or worse (heart maybe?).
My second epidural was horrible. The anethesiologist decided to
'sneak it in me' during a transition contraction. BIG MISTAKE!
I not only felt it, I jumped up in the air and began sobbing from
the pain and shock of being sneaked up on. Now you have to understand
that this pregnancy was already a difficult one, preterm labor
followed by pre-eclampsia, so that made me very edgey indeed, but
I doubt the "sneaker" will try that again anytime soon. I think
though that the bigger problem with this epi was that because of
the pre-eclampsia, all of my joints were fluid filled which made
finding a clear spinal path difficult. I remember asking the
anethesiologist what that "cracking" sound was (after I had settled
down from the sneak attack) and he said it was the needle trying
to make it's way through swollen cartilage. What a god-awful sound
it was! Once the epidural was placed, no other problems followed.
RE: External Manipulation...
Isn't this also called External Version?
Jodi-
|
48.110 | Thanks.. | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Andy Carter..Morph the Borg | Tue Jun 01 1993 07:23 | 6 |
| Re: All the replies on breech births/caesarians/epidurals.
Thanks for the info, there's certainly alot to consider. We're seeing the
consultant on Thursday, & hope to have more info. then.
Andy
|
48.111 | Breech Twins & Ceasarian | REOSV1::AMBLERJ | 100,000 lemmings can't be wrong..... | Tue Jun 01 1993 12:29 | 20 |
| My twins settled themselves one breech and the other transverse.
The hospital (Royal Berks. in Reading) arranged a pelvic X-ray to see if I
could manage a breech birth. The answer was yes-ish.
In the event I had toxaemia and needed to have the babies quickly for everyones
health. I was given the option of epidural or full anasthetic and chose for a
number of reasons (not least that an epidural lowers blood pressure and one of
the symptoms of toxaemia was very high blood pressure) the epidural.
I was not in labour and so the insertion of the epidural was easy and painless
(they gave me a local anaesthetic first). It numbed everything to perfection and
I had no unpleasent after effects. My husband was able to accompany me into the
operating theatre and watch the babies being delivered. He was apprehensive about
this and was hiding with my "head end" behind a screen that is provided across
the patient's chest. When the babies were about to be lifted out one of the
mid-wives told him to look and he did. He said it was wonderful.
I was up and walking around two days after the section.
Good Luck Andy.
|
48.112 | Panic over (for the time being) | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Andy Carter..Morph the Borg | Fri Jun 04 1993 08:33 | 10 |
| Helen had a scan yesterday (I went with her) and the good news is: Its
Turned!!
She never felt it at all and we had all these questions lined up for
the consultant but we didn't have to ask in the end. The midwife said
it must have happened while Helen was asleep. However, the head isn't
engaged yet (16 days to go) so I suppose there's still a chance it
might move back (please, no).
Now, what else is there to worry about...
|
48.113 | | NASZKO::DISMUKE | WANTED: New Personal Name | Fri Jun 04 1993 10:38 | 9 |
| College tuition!!!
8^)
Good news!!
-sandy
|
48.114 | How many final weeks are there? | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Andy Carter..(The Turtle Moves!) | Fri Jun 25 1993 10:47 | 12 |
| It looks as if we're in for another final week of pregnancy. 5 days overdue &
counting. No twinges, no dribbles, no nothing. We're both getting fed up now &
want it over with. You don't suppose its got lost do you? :-) How do babies know
when its time to get born? Should we be yelling thru' Helen's tummy saying "Come
on, times up".
I know there's at least another week before induction will be discussed.
Apparently the consultant will allow the baby to go 3 weeks over, if asked. I
don't know if this was a (rather bad) joke by the mid-wife, but it didn't make
us feel any better.
Andy
|
48.115 | | NASZKO::DISMUKE | WANTED: New Personal Name | Fri Jun 25 1993 11:18 | 11 |
| I know the feeling of the WAIT! My second was 12 days late. As long
as she feels good, just support her and hang in there.
My sister is due today (she's the one who had the chicken pox in her
first trimester) - however, in early May - she was beginning to dialate
and having minor contractions. They told to her hang on to the end of
May when it would be safer for the baby. Well, here we are end of June
and still waiting - no signs of anything starting!!
-sandy
|
48.116 | | USCTR1::HSCOTT | Lynn Hanley-Scott | Fri Jun 25 1993 13:16 | 8 |
| My first was 12 days late;my second, 3 days late.
Have sex! It helps....
Another option is having your OB "rim your cervix", which is simply
palpating it digitally - that too can trigger contractions.
best of luck,
|
48.117 | Nipple stimulation also | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Experience wildlife..have kids! | Mon Jun 28 1993 10:56 | 13 |
| I have also heard that nipple stimulation is sometimes used to trigger
contractions. I don't know anyone who had to resort to it, I just read
up on it in the birth books.
My first was 7 days late. This one I hope comes on time or a little early.
But I at least want to get 1 weeks rest before the birth. I
hate the thought's of leaving DEC on my last day and going into labor
the day after, I've heard this happens alot. So you end up getting no
rest before delivery and less STD!
Sandy (5 weeks to go with #2!)
|
48.118 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Mon Jun 28 1993 11:02 | 13 |
|
I was 14 days late with Spencer and 11 days late with Griffin.
Apparently I grow them big and well done.
I thought it would be easier waiting the second time. It was not.
All I can say is be kind to your wife, she is enduring her own
private hell right now. (if she has not already delivered). Waiting
and waiting and waiting (while you feel like an elephant wearing a
tutu) is nothing short of interminable.
Wendy
|
48.119 | | IMTDEV::COOP | Love will conquer all | Mon Jun 28 1993 11:30 | 11 |
| We had to use nipple stimulation a week before my daughter was
born, they thought she was under fetal distress because she had
not moved in hours when I was in for something else. We had to
sit in the hospital for hours, on a monitor waiting for movement.
Finally the nurse came in, told us to get into the bed together,
and take turns stimulating the nipples. How embarrasing! :-)
They do not recommend doing this, unless you are close to your
due date. It did start small easy contractions, enough to make
our daughter move, though.
jc
|
48.120 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | hate is STILL not a family value | Mon Jun 28 1993 11:46 | 9 |
| I useed nipple stimulation with Atlehi to try and get the contractions
coming/more regularly and stronger. It did work and I had the shortest
labor I have had with any of the three kids.
My water had broken without any signs of "good" contractions and there
was no way I was going to sit around for days the way I did with
Carrie. Now that was stressful.
Meg
|
48.121 | Tried allsorts.. | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Andy Carter..(The Turtle Moves!) | Tue Jun 29 1993 12:18 | 16 |
| We've tried:
Bumpy roads in the car/Guniness(1 half pint)/Gin&Tonic(1 glass)/walking
into town (about 2miles horizontal, 300ft vertical)/sex/nipple
stimulation(15 mins, 3 times a day for 9 days)/hot baths.
And still nothing (now 9 days late)! The nipple stimulation does have an
effect, the baby tends to move quite alot, but the effect is tranistory. I
think we're just about resigned to inducement at 2 weeks. At least that
gives us something to count down to.
What's Atlehi?
Still waiting,
Andy (& Helen)
|
48.122 | castor that did it | KAOFS::M_BARNEY | Formerly Ms.Fett | Tue Jun 29 1993 12:50 | 9 |
| My mother swears that I was delivered the day after she
took some castor oil, and has told me that several of her
friends tried the same method and succeeded.
(yech, I'd rather have sex 8-) )
Good luck!
Monica
|
48.123 | Blargh | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Andy Carter..(The Turtle Moves!) | Tue Jun 29 1993 12:58 | 3 |
| Yeah, Helen's been rather avoiding that one. I wonder why? :-{
|
48.124 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | hate is STILL not a family value | Wed Jun 30 1993 09:42 | 1 |
| Atlehi is about a 7/12 week-old baby woman.
|
48.125 | GOOD LUCK! | SOFBAS::SNOW | Justine McEvoy Snow | Wed Jun 30 1993 10:42 | 14 |
|
I heard Raspberry Tea induces labor. I drank a cup or two every
day that I was late (only 4 days) and a few days before. I have
absolutely no idea if it worked - everyone else in my family is
usually one - two (closer to two) weeks overdue, though.
FWIW, and it can't hurt...
I sympathize with your wife. When that due date comes and goes...
nothing could be more frustrating!
Justine
|
48.126 | want to give birth in LA? | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Wed Jun 30 1993 11:41 | 18 |
| I saw a TV news spot on a restaurant in Los Angeles that is booming
since its discovery by pregnant woman. Turns out that the rumor has
gone out that a certain salad there induces labor. It has goat cheese
and a dressing with balsamic vinegar. Otherwise, nothing unusual.
The news team interviewed an obstetrician who managed to keep a
straight face while considering if this salad might really work. He
granted the power of suggestion and was perhaps humble due to his many
years in medicine. He pondered if the balsamic vinegar might be
efficacious...
[For those inevitable questions, balsamic vinegar is aged in wooden
kegs in Italy. You can buy it in the imported food section of your
grocery. It is delicious, whether you're pregnant or not!]
:-)
Laura
|
48.127 | | SSGV01::ANDERSEN | Figures lie and liars figure. | Wed Jun 30 1993 14:02 | 7 |
|
re: .126
It's The Coyote Restaurant and it's the romaine and watercrest
salad.
|
48.128 | pray for a low barometer | SALES::LTRIPP | | Wed Jun 30 1993 14:13 | 9 |
| I had heard it was Pizza, maybe there's two places??
Oh and you could also hope for a drop in Barometric pressure. When the
barometer drops, it sometimes induces labor. In a blizzard it's always
fun for those of us who work for ambulances. In the summer we just
keep the raincoat handy, since it usually happens in the midst of a
mega-thunderstorm!
Lyn
|
48.129 | low pressure systems | KAOFS::M_BARNEY | Formerly Ms.Fett | Wed Jun 30 1993 14:18 | 11 |
|
>>Oh and you could also hope for a drop in Barometric pressure.
Gee Lyn,
That is not welcome news; low pressure is responsible for some of
my more horrific migraines. I can't imagine the two things going
on at once! And here I was saying that I would look forward to having
a child the way nature intended next time (I've been induced twice)....
Monica
|
48.130 | It's easier to carry it "on board" than as "luggage" | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Wed Jun 30 1993 15:09 | 24 |
| Well, at 6 1/2 months, I know that I'm getting tired of being pregnant,
so I can't imagine going OVER, but I DO remember with my other two,
after spending a few hours listening to them cry, I'd have given
ANYTHING to be able to put them BACK!!
When you're pregnant, it also doesn't matter when the phone rings, it's
easier to get just YOU in and out of the car/store, it's easier to feed
the baby while it's still "taking up residence", and there aren't any
messy diapers, and a LOT less sleepless nights. You can spend HOURS in
the shower/on the toilet if you like, your breasts don't leak all over
the place now and aren't NEARLY as tender as they will be, and face it not
too many people would DARE to stop a VERY pregnant-looking woman in the
mall, as opposed to just about every seemed to think they had the right
to tell you you shouldn't bring a newborn to the mall. (-;
Maybe we should start a note - the benefits of "being pregnant" as
opposed to having a newborn to deal with ....?!
GOOD LUCK!! I know I'm DYING to be "unpregnant", and there's this
voice in the back of my head saying .... you're gonna be SORRY, you
just Forget! (-:
|
48.131 | Tired,scared, what next? | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Experience wildlife..have kids! | Thu Jul 01 1993 07:58 | 25 |
|
I am 36 weeks with #2. I too am so tired of this pregnancy. The
first time is great because everything is new and you are getting
educated on pregnancy,labor & delivery. But after that, it just seems
like your going through the motions. I am really looking forward to
the birth of our baby, but I am not as into the whole thing as I was
with #1. Just eager for the whole process to be over.
I suppose chasing a 3 yr old around the house is no help. You can't
relax like you did the first time. I remember I used to take a one hr
nap everyday when I was pregnant with Danielle. This time I have not
taken a nap at all in 8 months....no time.
I am also very nervous about delivering this time. I went through h*ll
with the last labor (22 hrs) of hard slow progressing labor. I had a
vaginal but came close to a section. I think now, that "gee, I have to
be able to beat that" if 2nd babies come quicker than 1st babies
anything under 22 hrs for me I can handle.
the first time it was fear of the unknown....now it's "oh my god, I
know what to expect!" more or less.....
Sorry to ramble....
Sandy
|
48.132 | misery loves company :-) | KNGBUD::MACINTYRE | Karen A. MacIntyre | Thu Jul 01 1993 09:45 | 10 |
|
Sandy,
I can really relate, I'm at 38 weeks and have been feeling like you
for awhile. I also have a very active 3yr old! My first was 2 weeks late with
41 hrs of labor that ended in a C-section, so like you said, anything would be
better :-)
Ian was born in Feb., so I really think the heat and lack of sleep has
a lot to do with feeling miserable.
Hang in there.........................Karen
|
48.133 | | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Thu Jul 01 1993 09:58 | 15 |
| Re:-2 (Sandy)
I know what you mean about getting no rest. BUt as far as the long
labor goes...my first was about 27 hours long, back labor, slow
progress and I came very close to a C-section. I was getting myself
ready for a repeat with Neel (now 1 yr old) but with Neel labor was
only 45 minutes long (very painful but short). Everyone was surprised
that after Neel was born I was not tired at all and I was calling
friends on the phone informing them about Neel's arrival (he was born
over 3 weeks early). So second time labor could be short even if the
first one was long.
Hang in there.
Shaila
|
48.134 | Cheer up | CADSYS::BOLIO::BENOIT | | Thu Jul 01 1993 10:05 | 9 |
| My wife had "protracted labor" the first time, off and on for over 60 hours
with the first one....she was both tired and dehydrated when Madeline was
born, but was two weeks early....three months ago, she was overdue, was being
prepared to be induced and when in to spontaneous labor, 5 hours later we had
Gillian. The difference....the first time she was flat on her back for a week.
The second time, she went home from the hospital the next day!
Best Wishes
Michael
|
48.135 | | GOOEY::ROLLMAN | | Thu Jul 01 1993 10:25 | 30 |
|
I remember well entering a note about being pregnant for
the second time and getting little emotional support,
being afraid of labor (after all, I knew what it was
going to be like), dreading the sleepless nights,
wondering how in hell was I going to be able to keep
the toddler under control while carrying a tiny baby.
I mean, how do you grocery shop, when the baby is in
the cart, and the toddler is in the seat? Where do
you put the groceries? And when you're buying
diapers for two, that can fill a cart by itself.
And how do you fit the groceries in the car when the
whole backseat is taken by carseats? (the answer, BTW,
is that you will find ways to cope, and within a few
weeks you'll be ok.)
I was *so* tired. I was enormous, scared, and just
wanted the baby out so I could have my body back.
Well, here it is 8 months later. Labor happened,
I got a wonderful baby, and life went on.
Trust me. You will get thru labor again, you will
stop being pregnant, you will get thru the sleepness
nights, and you will look with awe at parents of
*3* children.
Pat
|
48.136 | Forgot about all the what ifs | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Experience wildlife..have kids! | Thu Jul 01 1993 12:19 | 17 |
| Pat,
Actually I haven't thought about any of the "what do you do when..."
that you mentioned after the baby comes. But now that you mention them
oh my gosh! I forgot about all of that fun stuff.....one thing I think
is that parenting the second time is easier because you are already a
parent and know oh so well what to expect. I feel condfident on being a
parent of a newborn and a 3 yr old. I have not yet had any doubts that
I could not handle it, but that may come after this one is born.
Think of how many times we all told ourselves when the first was born:
"How am I ever gonna take care of this little baby and work and grocery
shop and clean and cook etc......" We all survived it then and we
will survive this time!
Sandy
|
48.137 | courage | KAOFS::M_BARNEY | Formerly Ms.Fett | Fri Jul 02 1993 10:35 | 16 |
| Sandy, think about the fact that no matter what happened last
time (pain, for one thing). you were able to get through it,
AND had a wonderful outcome to boot! Think of the delivery as
a badge of courage. I personally think it takes some to do this baby
delivery thing. Focus on the happiness you had when everything was
finished, and not what you had to do to get there!
I looked forward to my second delivery a lot - but in my case it
was 32 hours of induction to have a child I knew would be stillborn.
So, I figured that THAT must be the worst there was, and I certainly
was right. Charlotte was 3 pounds bigger than her brother, and I
only had 9 hours of induction, and ripped much less.
Ya did it once....8-)
Monica
|
48.138 | Delivering exactly 2 weeks early | CSTEAM::WRIGHT | | Fri Jul 02 1993 13:31 | 11 |
| I've been noticing how many women deliver the day after they leave
work for their maternity leave. With Johnathan, my due date was
10/31, DEC let me out on 10/17, and I delivered him on 10/18. Same
thing for my sister and many friends. I wonder how much of it is
pyschological? I got thinking about this after reading all the
previous replies about being overdue. There are some disadvantages
to going too early, too! You miss out on some of your short-term
disability time off, and generally you miss that time to prepare
and "nest". So, there are pro's and cons to delivering early or
late!
|
48.139 | Lost both times | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Tue Jul 06 1993 09:55 | 8 |
| re:-1
Yah! I know what you mean about losing out on the 2 weeks - I lost out
both times. Avanti was born the day after I started maternity leave and
Neel was born over a 1 week BEFORE I started maternity leave.
Oh well.
Shaila
|
48.140 | Family Trait | ASIC::MYERS | | Tue Jul 06 1993 10:19 | 5 |
| I'm a "lost my 2 weeks of early std" mom. I was 15 days early with my
daughter, born less than 24 hours after I finished work. In my case it
appears to be just something that happens in my family. My mom had 3 kids
and 3 times she never made it to her due date, the closest she ever got
was 10 days before.
|
48.141 | second time around... | SALEM::BAILEY_K | | Wed Jul 07 1993 16:06 | 12 |
| I'm 35 weeks with my second and have a 20 month old at home. I can
certainly relate to how it feels to be overdue. I went out on STD on
September 19, due Oct. 6. Ended up being induced on October 22nd and
did require an emergency C-section. I would have preferred only one
week off instead of 4 before the birth -- the waiting was awful.
I am also finding the second pregancy much more uncomfortable and less
exciting than the first. Can't wait to get this over with at this
point. The heat wave doesn't help matters either!
Good luck to all.
Kathy
|
48.142 | Sorry I missed it.... :-) !! | SALES::LTRIPP | | Mon Jul 12 1993 16:49 | 16 |
| Gee, is this where I get to brag that I never saw my Last 7 to 9 weeks
of Pregnancy?? Since AJ needed out NOW due to distress the doctor did
a general anesthesia c-section. and had he not had the bowel defect he
would have gone to the normal nursery and home in the usual 4 to 5
days.
Oh and my first pregnancy, which was an in utero loss was a Wonderful
labor, I slept for 10 hours, rolled over pushed twice and had a 5lb9oz
baby with not even an incision. I honestly can say I was disapointed
when my doctor told me I had to have AJ by c-section, I wanted to
labor again. But to agree with some, the worst part of the experience
was the epidural procedure, it HURTS!
Lyn
(who prefers labor over going to the dentist!)
|
48.143 | I can see clearly now..... | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Experience wildlife..have kids! | Tue Jul 13 1993 07:24 | 16 |
|
I am now down to 2 weks and 3 days till due date. The other day I held
a 2 week old boy at a birthday party. That put everything into
perspective, I instantly lost whatever nervousness I was feeling about
delivering again. I just couldn't believe how tiny he was, I looked at
Danielle now 3, I said I can't remember you being this tiny. Then she
asked if she could hold the baby, she said "mommy, my hands are big,
see" I almost burst into tears. She was so good with him. I just hope
her reaction is the same with her new sibling.
So, I guess that holding that little newborn really took away alot of
the anxiety I have been feeling these last few weeks. I now am not
scared of laboring again, I'm very much looking forward to it.
Babies are wonderful!
Sandy
|
48.144 | It's getting closer ! | REFDV1::SENA | Here we grow again... | Wed Jul 21 1993 10:41 | 11 |
| I'm now less than two weeks away from my due date (August 2nd) with #3.
Since the first two were late (over 2 weeks), the doctors don't expect
this one to come early either (or on time, for that matter !). I'm
not looking forward to another 3 1/2 weeks of this....
I'm looking forward to not being pregnant, but I'm really NOT looking
forward to "newborn hell". Maybe this one will be the easiest of the
three :-) .
-Joy
|
48.145 | | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Mon Aug 02 1993 14:37 | 23 |
| I'm at 33 weeks now, and REAL tired of being pregnant .... for the past
month or so, my ankles have been real swollen. The Dr. says "It's the
pressure of the uterus" and there's not much that can be done. But now
it's getting a lot worse. My ankles are swollen and the bottoms of my
legs, right up to my knees. My feet are so puffy that it literally
HURTS to bend my ankles. And my legs ache in a weird/funny way - it
feels like all the veins in my legs are bruised. They're very tender
to touch, and a little pressure is enough to make me cry out. I never
had ANY swelling with the first two, so this is quite an unwelcome
change! Any time I mention anything about it at the Dr's they just
look at my feet say "Yup!" (as in that's normal), and carry on with the
rest of the visit.
My blood pressure has been normal to low right along. Has anyone else
had this "vein-pain"? Each day it seems to get a little higher in my
legs. It was just ankles, then a little of my leg, then half way up
the calfs, now it's up about to my knees. BTW, no amount of
sitting/resting/putting my feet up, makes my feet ANY less swollen,
they're huge elephant-ankles day and night.
Any thoughts?? I'll be SO glad when this child is born, even if he
DOES scream all the time (-:
|
48.146 | But it was definitely varicose veins | STAR::LEWIS | | Mon Aug 02 1993 15:11 | 9 |
| I had one teeny-tiny varicose vein just above my knee that was
very painful. It surprised me that I could walk on a leg that
hurt so much. (This was at nine weeks, too). The dr. put me on
one baby aspirin a day. It worked beautifully.
(I'm not suggesting you take it however, without consulting your dr).
Sue
|
48.147 | Not much to do | WHEEL::POMEROY | | Tue Aug 03 1993 09:47 | 26 |
| Patty,
I'm now at 38 weeks and have been having the same problems
with my legs. I'm also getting charlie horses in my right leg,
arch of my foot and my big toe! I was concerned with the swelling
as well. I thought I was developing toxemia, my mother got it
with me. The nurses told me the same thing, Yup! I didn't let
up, I let them know I was really concerned about it and then
they explained what they look for, the other signs of toxemia
are higher blood pressure (more than 15 increase), protein in
the urine. As long as all that checks out, it's not toxemia.
I'm also having sharp pains at the top of my legs and figure
it's the baby pinching a nerve in my back. I usually rub my
back or tummy to get the baby to move and then it stops.
Believe me, I know what you're going through. I'm just glad
I'm going in this friday to be induced and it will all be
over!
It will be over for you soon enough!
Good luck!
Peggy
|
48.148 | | POCUS::CUFF | | Tue Aug 03 1993 10:02 | 16 |
| re: .145
I had this the last 2 months, our daughter was born end August, I
always swell in the summer heat, but 7-9 months pregnant made it that
much worse. One thing that helped, while I worked outside the home was
to leave bed, immediately take a shower and put on support pantihose
right out of the shower, not to be removed till I was home again. When
I got home I would remove the hose when it was too hot to keep them on,
always putting on thick cotton running socks and good (supportive)
running tennis shoes. For some reason, while my legs and ankles were
supported the swelling wasn't as bad, if I cheated and put on sandals
or boat shoes, I was quite swollen and it bothered me a great deal.
Good luck, by the way my salt intake through that period was quite low
so I'm not sure that there was any contribution from that. Best
wishes, hope this is gone soon.
|
48.149 | Feet hurt and baby kicks too much! | FMAJOR::WALTER | used to be Aquilia | Tue Aug 24 1993 14:48 | 29 |
| I have been fortunate not to swell much at all during the summer heat.
I am 34 weeks now and gained 7 lbs at my last visit which surprisingly
the doctor said was fine due to it all went to the baby. I just hope I
don't have another month like last; it was hard to stay away from the
ice cream in the real hot weather.
I have found the my feet hurt regardless of what I do during the day,
what I wear and how much I am on them. At 5:00 p.m. the little buggers
are throbbing and nothing helps them but laying completely flat. I
can't even sit down to eat dinner sometimes because they throb so much
from not being elevated.
I also find the baby is kicking more and more which is increasingly
uncomfortable. I don't mean the little love kicks either. You see my
stomach rolling around and can feel the bulges through any clothing.
My husband doesn't know what to make of it; I think he thinks it hurts
me which sometimes it does. The baby feels so high lately that its
making me short of breath and I find myself sometimes faint because I
can't get enough oxygen to my system.
The other thing that I noticed is the veins in my stomach and breasts
are really really blue. They do not look varicose and do not protrude
but you can see them so clearly.
Any ideas on how to make the baby stop kicking so much? :) I know, I
will miss the activity when they are out of my body. Right now, I
can't think of much else.
cj
|
48.150 | rock-a-bye baby | GRANPA::LGRIMES | | Wed Aug 25 1993 09:16 | 5 |
| RE: Baby kicking
Rock in a rocking chair. It worked everytime for me when I was
pregnant with the second, who seemed to be kicking with 10 feet. I
thought I was having twins!
|
48.151 | Bleeding following an exam. | CSC32::L_WHITMORE | | Fri Sep 03 1993 16:06 | 22 |
| I need some quick reassurance and wasn't sure where exactly to put
this but thought this might be a good spot! I am expecting my second
baby - infact my due date was last Wednesday. Today, I had a dr.
appt. and the internal exam he did seemed to be extremely painful.
He said I was a couple of centimeters dialated. Anyway, after he
left the room and I stood up, I noticed that I was bleeding. This
scared me to death since this never happened with my first baby.
I called for the nurse, and she said not to worry - that the doctor
had probably just irritated my membranes to get labor going. Now
this worries me! He has said all along that he would not let me
go more than a week overdue and he would induce labor if necessary.
I have argued this point throughout the pregnancy believing that
unless the baby is under stress that I wanted to let nature take
it''s course. I'm concerned now because I feel like maybe he did
something during the exam today and didn;t tell me! Has anyone
had bleeding following an internal exam this late in a pregnancy -
and should I be concerned about such things as risk of infection??
I am not bleeding now, but have a very light pinkish staining -
also, no consistent or painful contractions yet. I guess I'm
mostly just looking for confirmation that bleeding following an
exam is normal and not a cause for concern! Thanks. Lila
|
48.152 | yes, it's ok | STAR::LEWIS | | Fri Sep 03 1993 16:30 | 8 |
| Yes, bleeding following an internal exam is normal. The blood vessels
around the cervix are now quite close to the surface and easily
irritated. And unless he put prostoglandin gel on your cervix or
broke your water, I really don't think he could have influenced
delivery *all* that much. Maybe a little. Relax, and good luck!
Sue
|
48.153 | it was very normal for me | BROKE::NIKIN::BOURQUARD | Deb | Fri Sep 03 1993 16:34 | 13 |
| I was also dilated (for several weeks!) before I delivered. I often stained
slightly after an internal exam. The doctor usually mentioned that I might
see this and that it was normal. I think they explained that there are lots
of blood vessels near the cervix that are somewhat weak, and it's very easy
to cause some slight bleeding during an internal exam. I believe they also
told me that I shouldn't see bleeding after 24 hours.
If it continues into tomorrow afternoon or if it gets heavier instead of
decreasing, then you might want to call the doctor's office (even if only to
relieve your mind). But I hope it reassures you some to know that someone else
has experienced this too.
- Deb
|
48.154 | Me too! | WONDER::MAKRIANIS | Patty | Fri Sep 03 1993 16:54 | 9 |
|
This happened to me too. I was in labor and they did an internal to
see how far along I was. When the doctor was done I went to the
bathroom and I was bleeding. I mentioned it to the doctor/nurse cause
I thought maybe this was my "bloody show", but they said, nope, it was
just from the exam. As said before, if it should continue or get worse
call your doctor, otherwise it's normal.
Patty
|
48.155 | thanks! | CSC32::L_WHITMORE | | Fri Sep 03 1993 16:55 | 4 |
| Sue and Deb - thank you so much for your quick responses! I feel
much better now knowing that the bleeding is normal. I'll try
to relax!! Thanks again. Lila
|
48.156 | thanks ! | CSC32::L_WHITMORE | | Fri Sep 03 1993 16:58 | 2 |
| notes collision! Thanks for your reply too, Patty! Lila
|
48.157 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | hate is STILL not a family value | Fri Sep 03 1993 17:56 | 12 |
| Lila,
If he hurts you during an internal exam, raise heck! I fought with my
last OB over this, because she was trying to surreptitiously strip my
membranes. This can open an infection path, as well as potentially tear
your cervix.
I don't want to scare you, but some Dr's don't like to let nature take
her course and this can become a complication. It is also very painful
Meg
|
48.158 | Stripping the membranes | CSC32::DUBOIS | Discrimination encourages violence | Fri Sep 03 1993 18:41 | 17 |
| < If he hurts you during an internal exam, raise heck! I fought with my
< last OB over this, because she was trying to surreptitiously strip my
< membranes.
That's what I was about to talk about, Meg! Thank you for the additional info
on it.
When Shellie was in labor for a day and a half, they didn't count it as
labor because though the pains were there, she wasn't dialating. Finally
the midwife said she would strip the membrames to bring on (productive)
labor. It hurt, but was effective. What she did was to put her finger
deep inside of Shellie, swiped her finger around in a circle, and broke
all of the little connections to the bag of water that she could reach
(isn't that the right explanation, Meg?). It worked, and we had the baby
about 12 hours later.
Carol
|
48.159 | | CSC32::L_WHITMORE | | Fri Sep 03 1993 19:41 | 14 |
| Carol - this is what I thought he may have done because this is what
he had said he would do if I went a week overdue (stripping the
membranes) - my Dr. is on call this weekend and I almost got the
feeling he wanted to induce for convenience. The risk of infection
is what scares me - I don't know what to watch for - the bleeding has
stopped and still no consistent contractions. Meg - is there any
way that I would know if indeed he attempted to strip the membranes
during my exam?? And if he did strip the membranes and I don;t go
into labor within the next 24 hours, wouldn't that increase the
risks of infection? Has anyone ever had a Dr. do this procedure
without their knowledge - it seems to me that he would have at least
forwarned me if there were potential dangers? Thank you for your
help. Lila
|
48.160 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | hate is STILL not a family value | Thu Sep 09 1993 13:41 | 20 |
| Lila,
hopefully this is all pretty well a moot point for you by now.
Pretty much, as long as your bag of waters in intact, you are still
fairly safe. The infection path has been opened somewhat, and there is
a potential increased risk for infection, but for most people this
shouldn't be a problem. I have major allergies to many antibiotics, so
any added infection risk is something I am dead set against.
If your temperature starts to rise, then I would be concerned about an
infection.
Carol,
Shat the midwife at your hospital did can be acceptable as Shellie was
already in active labor and was in a place where she could be watched
carefully.
Meg
|
48.161 | Still no Baby! | CSC32::L_WHITMORE | | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:29 | 12 |
| Hi folks - well I still have not got into labor! So, apparently, the
internal exam was just rough enough to cause some bleeding of the
cervix - I only showed some light brown streaks in the discharge
until late Friday night. I appreciate the feedback I got here and
thru mail. My next appointment is Monday, and I'm sure if this
baby hasn;t come on it;s own by then then the doctor will try
stripping the membranes to get labor going. My main concern was
that he might have done that without letting me know (Yes, I don't
have complete trust in my doctor but that;s another story!) - so
anyway, hopefully my next entry will be a birth annoucement! Thanks
again for your help. Lila
|
48.162 | means of induction | TAEC::MCDONALD | | Fri Sep 10 1993 05:41 | 7 |
| My doctor stripped the membranes without telling me, I was
dialated at 2cm at the time and 2 wks before the due date.
I didn't realize what he had done until I read about it later.
After he did it I lost the mucous plug and had some pinkish bleeding.
The baby was born 2 days later with no problems (But I would have
preferred that he ask me first!!!!!!!!!)
Carol
|
48.163 | | GOOEY::ROLLMAN | | Fri Sep 10 1993 11:19 | 13 |
|
The midwife stripped my membranes for the second
baby when I was 3 days late. She asked first, and
was willing to skip if I felt I wanted to. It
didn't hurt internally, but my vaginal opening took
a hit as she attempted to reach my cervix.
I *really* have a hard time with doctors/midwives
doing stuff without discussing it first. This is
*MY* body.
Pat
|
48.164 | Malpractice? | CSTEAM::WRIGHT | | Fri Sep 10 1993 12:54 | 4 |
| Heck, I'd call it malpractice when a doctor performs a procedure
without the patient's knowledge and consent.
Jane
|
48.165 | Bloody show at 36.5 weeks? | GMAJOR::WALTER | used to be Aquilia | Wed Sep 15 1993 12:41 | 18 |
| Hi All,
I just noticed brown and red/pinkish spots this morning and I am 36
going on 37 weeks along. I called the doctor and they seemed less then
concerned and told me that my cervix was starting to thin and it sounds
like the baby might be a bit early however, they did not ask that I
come in and get an internal exam. I also noted that I have started
mild contractions but nothing timeable and definately not braxton
hicks. My doctor is on vacation till Monday and they did say not to
exercise until Monday (I do swimming) and I believe its because it
might start contractions. I am still working and worry that the baby
is coming sooner and they aren't monitoring as closely as they should
just because the dr. is on vacation.
Is this normal to have this show this early?
cj
|
48.166 | | DELNI::DISMUKE | | Wed Sep 15 1993 13:35 | 10 |
| Well, my sister had contractions for a few weeks before her baby was
born...in fact they considered induction because he was taking his own
sweet time.
Try not to worry, but take things easy. If you are really concerned,
tell the nurse you want to see someone NOW. It is your choice, not
theirs!
-sandy
|
48.167 | 37 weeks is a term baby | BROKE::NIKIN::BOURQUARD | Deb | Wed Sep 15 1993 17:28 | 16 |
| It can be frustrating when people don't appear to be listening to your
concerns. As -.1 said, if you're really upset, do let them that know that
you want to see someone ASAP.
From what I've read, loosing the mucous plug (which is what the "bloody show"
is) can precede labor by as little as a few hours, or as much a couple of
weeks. And, if you're at 37 weeks, that's considered a term (vs. pre-term)
baby. Personally, I didn't have a bloody show until about 30 minutes after I
started labor (with fairly strong, regular 5-minute contractions), so I'm not
much help there...
Hang in there -- you're getting close! It's just frustrating not to know
how close "close" is :-)
- Deb
|
48.168 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Mon Sep 20 1993 11:50 | 12 |
|
With my first I lost my plug two weeks before he was born and I had
those awful contractions for two weeks prior to his birth.
With the second, it was almost the same story except that I also had
the "bloody show" (one of my favorite terms :-() eleven days before.
It is difficult to wait not knowing, in fact, it will probably drive
you nuts (as it did me) but hang in there. Your baby will come when it
is ready.
Wendy
|
48.169 | More ?'s on breech and version | AMCUCS::MEHRING | | Mon Oct 04 1993 15:54 | 45 |
| Well, I've read all the replies in here on breech and it seems most
common that either the baby turned in time, or c-sections were done after
an attempt to deliver vaginally didn't work out...
So, I'm looking for any more stories of successful versions (external
manipulation to get the baby to turn head-down), or "unsuccessful", if
that applies. Also, any info. about vaginal births of breech babies
would be helpful. I've read all about the risks of a foot/leg coming
through the cervix too early and possibly causing the head to get caught
(believe me, I wouldn't get that far if I knew this was footling!) but
am still curious to hear first-hand from anyone with experience.
I'm in the 38th week and have a version scheduled for the 7th (if the
"excercises" (lying on back with hips raised 15 mins/twice a day) haven't
coerced the baby to flip. I'm not afraid of a c-section, but have been
waking up thinking about this procedure (the version) for hours the past
few nights since I found out (via ultrasound) the position, so it is
obviously causing me some anxiety :-{
Other facts - it's my second child, first was born naturally at 9lbs.14oz
, so theoretically the birth canal should be "stretched" fairly well;
I don't know the type of breech yet (frank, footling, etc.- dr. will
check again before beginning the version) but this baby has "preferred"
this position since around 22 weeks; the legs/butt are not "engaged" yet;
the ultrasound last week showed the head/abdomen to measure right on
target at 37 weeks (but the legs measured for 40 weeks), so it doesn't
"appear" to be an oversized child (yet!!).
Most everyone I talk to says just "don't worry" and wait it out since
they or someone they know had a baby that turned "at the last minute",
but that's easier said than done at this point! I know I have the option
to skip the manipulation, and it does bother me to think it might bruise
the baby (previous reply - but that was a case of twins) or tangle the
cord, etc. etc. The procedure itself sounds fairly straightforward -
I get an injection of a drug which causes the uterine wall to loosen
a bit, then the dr. uses her hands to try to press the head down and the
butt up. This all takes place at the hospital, and a fetal monitor is on
at all times to track the reaction - if any signs of distress appear,
they whisk you off to O.R. for a c-section (have to pack the bag "just
in case" although she said she's never had that happen yet).
Anyone out there with more light to shed on this subject? Thanks for
listening!
-Cori
|
48.170 | I remember very well... | KAOFS::P_CHAPLINSKY | | Tue Oct 05 1993 15:41 | 59 |
| Hello Cori - your note was brought to my attention as I had a breech
baby.
Michael was born on January 19, 1992 - I've since had a girl :^)
At the last checkup, he was in the head-down position. My doctor said
that it was very unlikely that he would turn as there was no room.
Three weeks before his due date, I went into labour. I had been in the
hospital room for 3 hours when a nurse came to check on me. The labour
pains at this point were coming one after another. The nurse inquired
the time I had arrived and if it was my first. She told my husband
that I still had a good 12 hours to go and when I heard that I became
so discouraged that I asked for the epidural.
The nurse had me climb into bed and checked to see how dilated I was.
She exclaimed "My goodness your fully dilated; I can feel the sex!".
I'll never forget what she said - I became very upset as I had hoped for
a natural birth and she had spoiled the "it's a boy" moment. Anyway,
they wisked me into the operating room, inserted an IV (they made a
mess of that).
The doctor on-call wanted to perform a C-section but I wanted to try
delivering the baby naturally. She agreed to let me try; quickly did
an episiotomy (sp?), and with the guidance of the nurse, I pushed and
breathed as told. His penis was the first thing to show (that's when
the choice of Peter went out the window), then his bum, the body simply
followed. He was terribly bruised from the birth, the poor little
thing.
An hour after the delivery I was up and about holding my son and
simply beaming with joy as was my husband. The whole experience was
very terrifying. I was very upset that they did not monitor me during
my labour; they should have discovered he was breech. Having had
a second I KNOW they left me at the last stage for too long - I'm
sure he could have been delivered an hour or two earlier.
In your case, the medical staff will be prepared for your delivery,
that's great. That's a big difference.
My second delivery, one year later, was with a midwife (I wanted
someone with me at ALL times). She was excellent!! It took three
hours, from the very first cramp to delivery.
I think a breech birth the second time around would be easier.
If I had the choice between a C-section & a natural birth, I would
not hesitate for the later. The only problem is the child can get
stuck in the birth canal, then they have to push the infant back up
and perform the C-section. There is also the possibility of having
the cord in the way. I leave these decisions in the hands of the
doctor taking care of me; I feel they should know best.
If I were to compare the two births, the pain was pretty much the
same, the episiotomy is necessary and helps. I did not have to
push harder or longer; although I did have broken blood vessels on
my face with the first. I was told that I was holding my breath.
How I wish I was pregnant again :^) it's a wonderful feeling.
I wish you the very best.
Patricia
|
48.171 | close and anxious | NEST::CHAVES | | Tue Nov 09 1993 10:19 | 16 |
| Hi I'm just a little over 38 weeks. I've been having brackson hicks
contractions for a few weeks now. Last week at my doctor's appointment
I wasn't dialated yet but my cervix was very thinned out. This is my
first baby, and I was wondering how close I might be. My actual due
date is November 22.
Last night I was up all night with contractions (mostly in my
lower back) They were about 2 minutes long, and were about 30
minutes apart. Does this mean I'm really close? Everyone seems
to thimk I'm going to be early because the baby dropped about 4
weeks ago.
Well I'm all packed already, but does anyone think I should
start leaving my bag in the car incase I go into labor at work.
Maria
|
48.172 | hard to say | KAOFS::M_BARNEY | Dance with a Moonlit Knight | Tue Nov 09 1993 10:48 | 18 |
| with the first its always difficult to say - if you've read
some of the other stories and spoken to others, you know that
dialation, thinning, contractions, can all be signs but these
signs can go on for 1 day to three weeks without visible progress.
Just relax and let things work as they should; consider getting
more sleep (if possible!).
The only things you'd really need in a hurry would be those things
you were packing for the labour itself. It couldn't hurt to keep them
with you, but remember if you really are in labour at work and
need to get to the hospital from there you probably will need someone
else to drive!
Best of Luck Maria, keep us informed!
Monica
|
48.173 | who can tell???? :-) | BROKE::STEVE5::BOURQUARD | Deb | Tue Nov 09 1993 12:32 | 8 |
| My baby dropped at 27 weeks and my cervix was also about 50% effaced (thinned)
at this time.
I was *positive* I was going to deliver at least 2 weeks early.
And I did deliver early -- by one hour :-)
- Deb
|
48.174 | cyst in pregnancy, experiences? | LEDS::TRIPP | | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:17 | 34 |
| My sister inlaw is due, just about any day now. Good new is they have
been monitoring her very closely since late October, and they are 99%
sure its a boy, she is thrilled.
My question is to anyone out there who might have had a cyst or
abnormal growth discovered during pregnancy. She has been out of work
and extremly limited in activities since just before Halloween.
Aparently she woke up one moring in extreme pain, but no spotting. She
called he OB who sent her to the hospital for an exam. Result was she
was not in labor, but had a large cyst. (Personally I'm not too
convinced it wasn't at one point another baby, but that just a personal
thing, also based on fact there are twins on both sides) She was sent
home to lay on her right side, due to the cyst's position and take
tylenol with codiene every 4 hours for pain.
The way she described it the cysts fills up with "fluid", who know
could be amniotic, could be blood, and the empties itself, which is
when the pain occurs.
Since that point there has been an off again, on again thing of
C-section versus natural delivery. Has anyone delivered knowing there
was a cyst in with the baby. She has been told it will have to be
removed, but not until at least 6 weeks after the baby, and definitely
not at the delivery time due to risk of hemorage.
I have a sincere concern that she may hemorage during delivery, if the
cyst were to rupture or discharge it's fluid, plus I have concern that
she has been taking pain killers for several months now. She is also a
smoker, but that's just another rat hole.
This is her second pregnancy, she had trouble conceiving, could it have
anything to do with a clinical abortion 6 or 8 years ago?
Lyn
|
48.175 | | STAR::GOLIKERI | | Mon Jan 31 1994 11:49 | 6 |
| RE: Cysts.
My sister-in-law had cysts during her pregnancy. They were discovered
and were quite large in her 3rd month of pregnancy. She had some pain
that took her to the Drs and ultrasound a couple of times but she
delivered a healthy 7lber 4 days before due date.
|
48.176 | the end result was great! | LEDS::TRIPP | | Mon Mar 07 1994 16:22 | 13 |
| I thought I would sort of close the loop on this reply. My sister
inlaw gave birth to a healthy boy, Ryan Joseph last Friday afternoon.
She did have a c-section, they were able to view the cyst, but did not
remove it, she will have that done in 6 to 8 weeks. He water broke
during the storm Thursday, but managed to hold off until nearly
midnight before venturing out. There was muconium in the water when it
broke. The doctor decided arount 3pm Friday that a C-section was in
order considering everything, cyst, muconium, failure to dialate oh
and the best reason of all, the doctor wanted to head off to the
SLOPES for the weekend! In any case mom is sore, but both aer
doing fine!
Lyn
|
48.177 | what is PUPPS? | LEDS::TRIPP | | Mon Mar 07 1994 16:41 | 7 |
| Oh and one more of those dumb questions... What is PUPPS?
it seems to be some kind of an all over the body rash, that occurs in
the last trimester to first time mothers. My sister inlaw has been
covered with this rash for the last couple weeks, but now is not sure
if she's too sore to scratch, or too itchy to care that it hurts!
Lyn
|
48.178 | pointer | IVOS02::NEWELL_JO | The hills are alive | Mon Mar 07 1994 17:29 | 3 |
| See note 470.*
Jodi-
|
48.179 | PREGNANCY TEST | JUPITR::SMENSAH | | Sun Apr 24 1994 23:28 | 2 |
| I WANT TO KNOW IF EVERY PREGNANT WOMAN HAS TO BE TESTED FOR
THIS DISEASE,SYPHILLIS AND AIDS
|
48.180 | | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Rozan Kobar! | Mon Apr 25 1994 09:25 | 5 |
| Which disease? In the UK, no-one 'has' to be tested for anything they
don't want to be tested for. We decided not to have the amnio-centesis
(sp.?) test for downs syndrome.
Andy
|
48.181 | yep | CNTROL::GEARY | | Mon Apr 25 1994 10:00 | 6 |
| I was told that it was required to be tested for both. However you
do not recieve the results unless you request them. The data is for
statistical purposes. The same thing happens when you get blood work
done for a marriage license.
lori
|
48.182 | | GAVEL::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Mon Apr 25 1994 10:24 | 6 |
| re: .179--.181
I'd guess that this varies from state to state in the U.S.A. and certainly,
as .180 points out, from country to country.
Clay
|
48.183 | It is partly Law | LEDS::TRIPP | | Mon Apr 25 1994 10:24 | 14 |
| I understood there was a Law, (state or federal I'm not sure which)
that required the baby be tested at birth for AIDS, if not more. For
obvious reasons, and as a parent, I too would want to know if my new
baby was sharing the nursery, and nurse's who don't necesarily change
protective clothing between handling newborns.
I think the hospital is required to tell at least the mother if not
both parents if the baby tests positive. I think the testing was
started around 1987. I think they may also test some if not all babies
for drugs and alcohol. I'm not sure if this is for every baby, or just
those who appear to be at risk.
I suspect the March of Dimes or any hospital with a good NICU could
fill in the blanks here.
|
48.184 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | stepford specialist | Mon Apr 25 1994 11:32 | 10 |
| Lynne,
As far as I know it isn't law, and Newborn screens vary from state to
state. last year, the hospitals in CS were routinely screening for HIV,
but not giving the results to parents, unless they asked. (Makes sense
to me.......NOT!) My OB asked if I felt that I needed an HIV screen
along with the usual prenatal blood testing, and made it clear it was
optional.
meg
|
48.185 | | STAR::AWHITNEY | | Mon Apr 25 1994 11:43 | 3 |
| So, what I'm hearing is that they test you and your child for HIV and
if you have it they don't tell you????? Does not make any sense to me.
|
48.186 | | XPOSE::POIRIER | | Mon Apr 25 1994 11:51 | 9 |
| Three years ago when my first was born, they tested babies in NH for
HIV and reported results anonomously to the state....It was a way to
get statistics on the disease. If parents wanted to have the results,
they were required to have the child retested as the first test did not
have any name related to it.
I have no clue what they do now.
|
48.187 | | NODEX::HOLMES | | Mon Apr 25 1994 14:32 | 13 |
| My understanding is similar to -.1. I went to a talk by a nurse from the
Immunology Clinic at UMass Medical Center last month. From what I understood
from her, in MA, all newborns are tested for several diseases, including
HIV. The testing is anonymous in that once the blood from the newborn is
drawn, it can never be associated with that infant.
She told us that in 1993, there were 50 infants born in Worcester who tested
HIV positive at birth, but that only 12 mothers had been identified as HIV
positive before the birth. So, a high percentage of the HIV positive mothers
were not getting the treatment that could help their own health as well as
protect their children from the virus. :-(
Tracy
|
48.188 | HIV | CSC32::DUBOIS | Discrimination encourages violence | Mon Apr 25 1994 14:39 | 12 |
| <So, a high percentage of the HIV positive mothers
<were not getting the treatment that could help their own health as well as
<protect their children from the virus. :-(
Tracy, what can a pregnant mother do to protect her child? I wasn't aware
there *was* anything.
Incidentally, 3 out of 4 of the babies who test positive are only reflecting
their mother's antibodies and do not have the virus themselves. The "positive"
result of the test will go away in a few months/years.
Carol
|
48.189 | | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Mon Apr 25 1994 15:00 | 8 |
| > Tracy, what can a pregnant mother do to protect her child? I wasn't aware
> there *was* anything.
Wasn't there a recent study that showed that giving AZT to pregnant women
substantially reduced the rate of infection in their babies?
-Neil
|
48.190 | | NODEX::HOLMES | | Mon Apr 25 1994 15:07 | 20 |
| > Tracy, what can a pregnant mother do to protect her child? I wasn't aware
> there *was* anything.
There was a study done through the Immunology Clinic at UMass in which some
HIV-positive mothers were given AZT treatments during pregnancy and others
were given a placebo. The children of these women were followed for 3 years
after birth, and those born of the AZT-treated mothers had a *significantly*
lower chance of actually having the virus. I don't remember the actual
numbers, but the difference was so dramatic that the study was ended
prematurely so that *all* identified HIV-positive mothers could be treated.
I wish I could remember more of the details of her talk. I remember being
so surprised that only about 12% (I think) of babies born to HIV-positive
mothers have the virus themselves. I'd always thought it would be 100%.
If anyone is interested in finding out more about the work at UMass, it
was done out of the Special Immunology Clinic there and was part of a
study called the Women and Infants Transmission (WIT) Study.
Tracy
|
48.191 | Look up "Bayesian statistics" | eludom.zko.dec.com::JBISHOP | | Mon Apr 25 1994 15:36 | 60 |
| It's been covered elsewhere, but it's worth repeating that
tests are inexact--they will sometimes say "YES", when the
person does not have the disease, and "NO" when they do
(false positive and false negative).
In particular, the incidence of AIDS is so low, and the
false positive rate of the cheap test is so high, that
we can expect to get many more false positives than true
ones.
So while the rate of positive results is interesting to the
statisticans and is related to the actual AIDS rate, it's
not exact enough to be worth worrying parents with, as the
odd are still far better than even that the child doesn't
really have the disease.
-John Bishop
Here's a note from MEDICAL:
================================================================================
Note 627.4 Question re:blood tests for marriage license 4 of 11
MINAR::BISHOP 34 lines 1-FEB-1990 11:52
-< Not quite a death sentence... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
re .3, positive = death sentence
There are several AIDS tests. The cheap ones produce a fair
number of false positives (says you have AIDS, but you don't).
Given the low incidence of AIDS in the population getting
marriage licenses, there are going to be more false positives
than real ones.
Example:
Test 100,000 people. Assume .1% (100 people) actually have AIDS,
and that the false positive rate is 1%, and the false negative rate
is 1% (in actual fact, the AIDS rate is lower than a tenth of a
percent, and the false positive rate on a "quicky" test done in
vast batches can be higher than 1%, so the disproportion can be
even larger than in the example below).
98,901 people are told they do not have AIDS
98,900 really don't have AIDS.
1 person who has AIDS is told he or she does not.
1099 people are told they have AIDS.
1000 of them do not.
99 do have it.
Notice that a thousand people panic, and that ten times as many
people are told they have AIDS as actually do. This is why most
states did not institute AIDS testing for marriage licenses.
The standard recommendation for a positive AIDS test is to go
pay the money for a more sensitive test which is tuned to
produce almost no false positives.
-John Bishop
|
48.192 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | stepford specialist | Mon Apr 25 1994 16:47 | 10 |
| Things that can be done to lessen the child of a mother who is HIV
positive from passing the virus on to her child. One of which is not
breast feeding. Studies show that this is one of the few problems that
completely contraindicate breast feeding.
There are also debates on delivering via c-section, and immediate
clamping of the umbilical cord on delivery to reduce risk of
cross-transfusion between mother and baby.
Meg
|
48.193 | There are different testing methods | LEDS::TRIPP | | Tue Apr 26 1994 09:29 | 32 |
| I had entered a reply yesterday, and as I got to the end, the link was
lost. I will try to enter a brief summary of what I said.
I have had no direct *human* experience with HIV, and this is pointed
towards the "false positives" discussion. I adopted a stray cat last
year (see my note from Aug '93 "moral delima adopting a stray") Barney
is now a healthy happy member of our family, but almost was a "hasbeen"
before his time. As part of his adoption we had him tested for FIV,
which is feline AIDS and other diseases. (NO you can't contract AIDS
from a cat, not to worry!) This at a fairly large, and well known
Worcester Animal Hospital. A week later I get a call informing me that
Barney had tested *positive* for FIV. I was instructed to
*immediately* put him down. The other options were to keep him in a
single cat household, or give him to someone with other FIV+ cats. My
reaction, call it gut feeling was there was something wrong with this,
but isn't denial always the first reaction to bad news? I called Tufts
animal hospital and was seeking any/all info on FIV. They agreed to
retest him , using a different, socalled more accurate method.
Fortunate for all of us, it turned out negative. This test carries a
98% accuracy rate, the first is just a "screening" test and is 85%
accurate.
I believe in humans, not babies, that blood is tested three different
ways before declaring the patient HIV+. I almost wonder with a
"one-shot deal" on newborns, that some of the results could be
inaccurate. I would also wonder which method the newborn nursery uses,
since I have discovered there are radically different ways of testing.
Part of me also wonders how many inocent animals have been put to
death, due to a faulty test, but that belongs in another notefile.
Lyn
|
48.194 | | PINCK::GREEN | Long Live the Duck!!! | Fri Mar 31 1995 12:53 | 14 |
|
Well, today I will be off for the final countdown. 2 more
weeks till due date, who know how long till the birth. :-)
Just let me pick up the infant seat, wash come clothes
and linen... then BabyR can come. :-)
I just wanted to thank everyone who entered notes in this
conference, it sure helps to know that you are not alone and
your 'symptons' are just not that unique...
I can't wait! I can't wait! I can't wait!
Amy
|
48.195 | Good luck! | CSLALL::JACQUES_CA | Crazy ways are evident | Fri Mar 31 1995 13:26 | 6 |
| Amy,
Good luck, and God bless you with a real quick, conventional,
delivery!
cj *->
|