T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
328.1 | Debunking myths is a bottom-up process :-) | MLTVAX::FISHER | Building a faster pig | Mon Jul 29 1991 17:02 | 26 |
| Interesting note, Ralph. I, too, used to be circumspect in mentioning my
nude recreation to friends and co-workers, but I came to a similar conclusion
as you and slipped something in to a conversation one time at work. No big
reaction, though there might have been a raised eyebrow or two at first.
By now, all of my friends and most of my co-workers know, and I'm none the
worse for it, maybe even better off, overall. Sometimes I'll take a little
ribbing, but I can see they're laughing with me, not at me. I even mentioned
it to my (ulp) parents, and although their reaction was typically stoic,
they still seem to like me just the same as before. Mind you, I don't go
out of my way to mention that I like to run around with no clothes on, but
I don't pause as long before speaking up if conversation turns that way.
I recently learned through a third party that our neighbor, a very nice old
lady, used/uses a pond on her property as a skinny-dipping spot. (It's a
nice little pond, too, I'll have to get myself invited to use it. :-) I
suspect the woods are full of such people, keeping mostly to themselves.
And it's no wonder, in this society where "don't rock the boat" seems to be
gradually leading to "report your neighbor". The only way to stem the tide
is through public education, and on a personal level that means letting
people see that nudists aren't drooling sicko child-molseters, but normal
folks like (hopefully) you and I.
It's a lot of responsibility, and sometimes I need to take a break from it
and just lay out in the sun with a cold beer.
Carl
|
328.2 | some thoughts... | SUBWAY::LANKA | Instrument flying is fun! | Mon Jul 29 1991 23:56 | 25 |
| Well, this is an interesting subject, and one I think I'll comment on.
I rarely mention my fondness for nudity, because I have the
psychological barrier in my head that says the person I mention it to
will automacilly think SEX PERVERT about me, although that is far from
the truth. This kind of goes hand in hand with the "No single male"
policy at many nudist resorts. I guess there are a lot of single males
who use nudity as sexual outlets, otherwise why would there be so many
nudist camps with this policy?
Personally, I prefer going to nudist recreation/camp areas with a
member of the female persuasion, because in the past when I have gone
as a single, I have gotten the feeling that others who are there as
couples are giving me the "cold shoulder" because I'm a single male,
although my intentions are absolutely innocent, i.e. just there for the
social nudity, not for "staring/getting my rocks off"
Anyway, the reason I mentioned this, which was slightly off the subject
was that it keeps me from openly discussing my preference because of
the stigma I think people will associate with it. I guess the only way
to break through it is to just swallow my pride, and take my chances
with what peoples reactions will be. I guess if I did this in all
areas of my life, I would be better off.
Jeff
|
328.3 | terminology | DANGER::JBELL | Zeno was almost here | Tue Jul 30 1991 10:27 | 6 |
| Why is it if you say "we went to a nude beach" some people
will think of it as a semi-erotic experience, but if you say
"we went skinny-dipping" it conjures images of child-like
playfulness with a small hint of mischievousness?
I know I know. All together now: "Why ask why..."
|
328.4 | anonymous reply | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Fri Aug 02 1991 18:27 | 55 |
| I'm posting this for a conference reader who would prefer to remain
anonymous.
-Neil Faiman, NATURISM moderator
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frankness in nudity is something that I've not really come across at all
since I came to the US about a year ago from Europe. This notesfile is all
I've seen, in fact. The society here is as prudish as I experienced England
as a child in the 50's, so how on earth can anyone actually be frank, without
incurring the wrath of some "interest" group or other? I've seen the Puritans,
and they're in the US! :^)
My wife and I are "closet naturists". We enjoy being naked, but not in public.
The closest we've come to it was on a beach in Denmark 2 years ago, which I
guess would be described in here as "clothing optional", and elsewhere in
Europe where much skimpier swimsuits are so much more common. Toplessness
pretty much seems to be the norm in the resorts we visited, for example, and
no-one took any notice - except a few fat, middle-aged American tourists. (I
know, I shouldn't generalise like that, but there is a European view of such
creatures :-) ) We did spend most of that vacation nude, but only because we
were in totally isolated places and could be alone. I was EXTREMEMLY tempted
to strip off completely on that beach in Denmark, but didn't. I still ask
myself why not, and haven't found a real answer. My wife did spend the
vacation topless, however.
So, we're not as frank as we could be. My wife is freer than I in this respect,
and she is American, too. She enjoyed the freedom to go topless in Europe
that she doesn't have over here - it was even posted as illegal at the last
beach we visited! So, where is this leading ......
We make no bones about the fact that we go nude together. We have encouraged
friends and acquaintances to go to the places we've enjoyed, if we sense that
they would also enjoy them. We swim naked in our back-yard pool, although
the suits come off once we're in the water and go on again before climbing
out - unless it's night time :-) We spend our time in the house, when the kids
aren't home, nude. It's a great sense of freedom, but I wouldn't feel *that*
free if socially nude, which is why I've not done so - yet. We haven't lost
any friends because of what we've told them, and if we did I wouldn't regard
them as real friends to lose.
On the other hand, we would not go to places with friends or acquaintances and
then go nude. We don't swim naked when visitors are around, and our suits are
much more substantial at such times. We keep some form of clothing on in the
house when others are staying with us. I think it'd be an interesting question
for us to be frank about if a visitor asked if he/she could swim nude. I guess
the answer would be "as long as you're discreet, as there are neighbours that
could see into our yard if they really want to, and might be offended". I
suspect *I* might be even more offended by a "peeping Tom", as they really do
have to look carefully from certain angles to see even a part of our yard.
Having said all this I now feel slightly a victim of my own writing, as I'm not
able to be frank enough with myself to "come out" in such a public/social forum
such as this! One day ......
|
328.5 | Sick society . . . | HPSRAD::JWILLIAMS | John Williams Cirrus 297-6141 | Tue Aug 20 1991 18:03 | 23 |
| One can imagine easily how people would react if a rape or other sexual
incident were to occur in a clothing optional setting. It would be a field day
for the puritans and the media. ( The puritans think fun = sin, the media
thinks fun = hazard ) We seem to be very fortunate in that very few crimes
are associated with nudity, ( at least those which are punishable by law ),
but a distinct possibility to contend with is the eventuality that some
terrible thing could happen that would shut the case for another 100 years.
There is a statement being made with nudity, however, it is not sexual
invitation. This is the hardest aspect to relate. Nudity will only last as
long as this distinction can be asserted.
For myself, I go nude because I enjoy the freedom. I do not go nude as a
sexual overture and I do not perceive sexual invitation in others whom I
happen to be nude with. How different things would be if more people tried
it, for in an instant I think they would recognize how ridiculous it is to
perceive so intimate a statement as sexual invitation in so social a context
as nudity.
While the connection between nudity and sexual invitation still exists, it's
an uphill battle that could backfire at any moment.
John.
|
328.6 | going a little further | ESGSEG::DITOMMASO | I cant get use to this lifestyle | Wed Aug 21 1991 18:10 | 21 |
|
Taking your scenerio a little bit further ...
Could you imagine the court case that would follow if a rape did occur
at a nude beach, or area.
Lets say the rapist was caught and brought to trial. Could you imagine
the trial after that. What about the jury? Would they have naturists
on the jury? Think about how important what a woman was dressed in has
been in the past, as far as rape cases go, and what this would be like.
This actually would be a good case for LA Law ... they have done one
naturist show before.
Well, it sounds so much to people like us that a the rapist should be
convicted and shot (or something close to that), however, I'm sure there
are millions of (sick) people in this country that would think other wise
because the victim was naked.
paul
|
328.7 | No special law for naturists | QCAV02::CSUNDER | | Mon Jul 19 1993 03:43 | 5 |
| I feel the rapist in a naturist setting should be dealt by law in the
same manner as would be in a non-naturist setting. He/she should not be
punished in more severe manner like convicting or shooting. The moment
laws are tailor made for naturism, the spirit of naturism is lost.
|