| Title: | Naturism |
| Notice: | Site report index is in topic 7 |
| Moderator: | GENRAL::KILGORE |
| Created: | Tue Jan 26 1988 |
| Last Modified: | Wed May 07 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 457 |
| Total number of notes: | 3687 |
In the Feb. 9 Wall Street Journal page A16 There is an article about
Germans on vacation and how it is now popular to sue someone ( tour company,
hotel, travel agent etc. ) if the vacation is not perfect. Because their
are so many suits, a judge came up with guidelines for refunds. Example:
brochure promises a heated pool and the pool isn't, the client gets 5% to
10% back. If hotel is suppose to be on the beach and turns out to be far
from the water client gets 5% to 10% back. IF THERE IS NO PLACE TO SUNBATH
NUDE CLIENT GETS BACK UP TO 20%. I thought it interesting how much more
value is put on nude sunbathing over location of hotel to the beach.
Paul
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 135.1 | Some bugs are harder to work around than others | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Sun Feb 12 1989 00:21 | 6 |
Of course, if you're a mile from the beach, you can still get to the
beach. If there's no place to sunbathe nude, and that's what you
wanted on your vacation, you're just out of luck. In that sense, it
seems pretty reasonable.
-Neil
| |||||
| 135.2 | Of Course! | HPSTEK::SHERMAN | Wed Feb 15 1989 08:32 | 8 | |
Hi:
It seems most silly, to me, that such conveniences have not been
made available virtually everywhere simply as a matter of course.
What's the matter with people anyway!
Stan/
| |||||