[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Naturism |
Notice: | Site report index is in topic 7 |
Moderator: | GENRAL::KILGORE |
|
Created: | Tue Jan 26 1988 |
Last Modified: | Wed May 07 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 457 |
Total number of notes: | 3687 |
67.0. "Topfree in Kittery, Maine" by MOIRA::FAIMAN (A goblet, a goblet, yea, even a hoop) Thu Jun 09 1988 10:55
The following story is reprinted from _Bare_in_Mind_, January 1988,
where it was reprinted from _Fosters_Daily_Democrat_ (the Dover, New
Hampshire newspaper). I don't know the date of the original story, but
it was presumably sometime last summer.
Of course, anyone who is inclined to try going topfree in Kittery ought
first to check on the status of the ordinance discussed in this
article.
-Neil
======================================================================
Kittery finds law doesn't cover nudity
---------------------
By Samuel A. Mead
Democrat Staff Writer
---------------------
Kittery, Maine -- Ironically, it appears the town has been
left uncovered in its attempts to halt topless sunbathing at
local beaches because there is no law disallowing it,
according to the police chief.
However, the result of Tuesday night's Town council meeting
may be a stepping stone in empowering police in dealing with
topless sunbathing.
The Town Council voted to draft an emergency ordinance banning
that sunbathing practice and will take public comment on the
measure August 6 [1987].
Police Chief Ed Strong, who approached the Town Council
Tuesday night saying that he was neither for nor against
topless sunbathing, but was simply "relaying a concern," said
his office had received a number of complaints.
Seapoint Beach and portions of Fort Foster have been the
particular area of concern, said Strong, who brought the issue
up at the end of the two-hour Town Council session.
"The topless bathing has been occurring throughout the town,"
said Strong, this morning. "It has been occurring every
year."
Recent complaints that have been logged on the daily police
record have come from mothers with children who had been at
Seapoint Beach and Fort Foster, where topless women had been
seen, he said.
The department originally believed it was authorized to
enforce women wearing tops because it was considered a public
indecency to be topless. However, closer scrutiny of the law
did not identify topless women as being publicly indecent, he
said.
The department's usual response to complaints would be to
request that those women put their tops back on.
"We can stop bottomless, but not topless, sunbathing," said
Strong, adding, "We aren't covered for it."
Under Maine state law, the town police department is the
enforcing body of the law at Seapoint and Fort Foster and have
the power to regulate nude sunbathing.
"You cannot expose the genitals under Maine law," said Strong,
this morning.
The Council approved a motion to have an emergency ordinance
drawn up that would prohibit topless sunbathing on the public
beaches, and to have the ordinance discussed at a public
hearing August 6 at a special Town Council meeting, starting
at 5 p.m.
Strong said this morning he believed it was the first time
such a public hearing on topless sunbathing would be held.
Councilor Dennis Estes, the only councilor to vote against the
motion to hold a public hearing, said he did not feel that the
matter warranted an emergency ordinance thereby allowing the
regular council rules to be waived.
Those rules state that public hearings must be advertised some
two weeks in advance.
Estes also asked Strong if the complaints were all from
mothers and not from women without children, or from men.
Prior to the public hearing, the town manager will review with
the town attorney whether the matter can be considered an
emergency.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
67.1 | Apparently no ordinance | MOIRA::FAIMAN | A goblet, a goblet, yea, even a hoop | Fri Jun 10 1988 15:35 | 7 |
| A phone call to the Kittery town hall reveals that the proposed
ordinance was not passed. Someone at the Police Department says
that they "haven't had any complaints this summer."
But please don't take my phone calls as authoritative!
-Neil
|
67.2 | absurd | SUBSYS::NEUMYER | sun your buns | Wed Nov 28 1990 16:15 | 14 |
|
I don't understand how the system works, I guess. A 'number' of
complaints are received regarding topfree women on the beach. There is
no law being broken by the women.
Why in the world would the town law making body even consider
changing the laws to cover this situation. This means that if a number
of people complained about regular bikinis on the beach that a possible
law could be written?!?!?!?!?!? ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLE.
I know that a citizen can propose any law, but really
ed
|
67.3 | the usual | AWAKE::WESTERVELT | | Wed Nov 28 1990 16:55 | 8 |
|
I'm afraid you might be confusing the term "politician"
with "person of principle".
MHO. No flames, please.
BTW, clever of you to play on the word "cover"! :-)
|
67.4 | | SUBSYS::NEUMYER | sun your buns | Thu Nov 29 1990 08:55 | 8 |
|
Re. .3
I'd never confuse those two terms. :-)
ed
|