T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
30.1 | | CADSE::WONG | Let's cut them off at the pass... | Tue Mar 01 1988 09:32 | 23 |
| Once burned, never again...
It can be very embarassing for a new naturist to get sunburned in
places that aren't used to seeing the sun. It can get very difficult
to sit down, but how do you explain that to people who don't know
you're a naturist?
I tan easily so I always start out the first couple of times in
the summer with SPF 8 or 6, and graduating up to 2 by the end of
the season. I haven't gotten a sunburn in three years now. It's
gotten to be a routine to put on lotion several times while I'm
out sunning so I don't have to worry about burning anymore.
I remember someone that I used to work with who feel asleep on the
beach and got her corneas burnt (along with all the skin on her
face). She had to wear sunglasses (even indoors) for several weeks.
That sun can be dangerous.
When people talk about the "bare" essentials, they mean sun screen
and sun glasses!
B.
|
30.2 | And, what to do after a burn | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Calm down, it's only 1's and 0's | Tue Mar 01 1988 11:41 | 24 |
| Actually, I've found getting burned once in a season makes it much less
likely to burn again. Still, it's not fun while the burn is there.
Another question is, what to do *after* you burn. Up until I moved to
Colorado, I didn't really know - I proved it impossible (during my
silly teen-aged years) to burn in Chicago. I had to do something
stupid to burn in Florida. But those high altitudes really get me. I
had to go ask some of my fairer relatives.
I've found that Solarcane works well to tone down the pain. I've also
found that various cocoa butter creams put on the burn several times a
day seem to promote healing and reduce the chances of peeling. Cocoa
butter also removes much of the heat from the burn, making it feel
better. In a pinch, almost any hand/body cream or lotion will help
keep it moisturized.
As far as sunglasses go, I've heard conflicting things. One is that
they help protect the eyes from UV rays, especially for people with
blue (or other light) eyes. The other is that they actually make
damage to the eyes *more* likely because they make the sun seem less
bright. Anyone know why there are 2 diametrically opposed stories
around?
Elizabeth (who is typing with very sore shoulders presently)
|
30.3 | *Some* sunglasses filter out the UV | MOIRA::FAIMAN | Ontology Recapitulates Philology | Tue Mar 01 1988 12:01 | 15 |
| The problem (as I have heard it) is that some sunglasses filter
only the visible radiation from the sun. This tells your eyes
that it isn't really all that bright out; your pupils open up
wide; and that unscreened dose of midday summer ultraviolet does
its work on your eyes. (My high school shop teacher told us
horror stories about people doing arc-welding without goggles.
Same problem: it doesn't *look* that bright, but it's the UV
that does the damage.)
So, those cheap sunglasses really can make damage more likely. But
most of the decent sun glasses that I've seen (even the clip-on
plastic ones) say on the label that they block UV. Those are
the ones that you should look for.
-Neil
|
30.4 | Clothed with the SPF 15 :-) | DSSDEV::JACK | Marty Jack | Tue Mar 01 1988 17:34 | 0 |
30.5 | Don't bother with SPF 21 | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Tue Mar 01 1988 18:21 | 7 |
| Re: .0
My understanding is that beyond SPF 15, there isn't much difference
between various levels. It isn't worth the trouble or the expense
to hunt for anything stronger than 15.
Gary
|
30.7 | SPF ratings | GENRAL::KILGORE | The Desert Rat | Sun Jul 03 1988 15:25 | 22 |
| The following is excerpted from the June 1988 issue of SELF magazine:
SPF 8 The best-bet sunscreen for the 70 to 80 percent of Americans
with medium to dark skin. Since it screens out 87.5% of all
UVB rays... SPF 8 greatly reduces sun damage, yet still allows
you to tan.
SPF 10 Got fair skin that burns before it tans? Make your SPF at
least 10, meaning you can up your sun-time tenfold before
burning. If in doubt, upgrade to SPF 15, currently the
highest SPF recognized by the Food and Drug Administration
[news to me! jk]
SPF 25 "A point of diminishing returns," a few experts say. Although
this blocks 96 percent of UVB rays, that's only about 7 percent
more than SPF 10 (90 percent). So unless skin is ultra-sun-
sensitive, you may be getting more than you need.
SPF 40 How "more" is "less": SPF 40 doesn't block even 1 percent more
UVB than SPF 30, yet takes a quarter more sunscreen. And since
that much extra may irritate skin, it may not be worth the risk,
say some dermatologists.
|
30.8 | think of shotglassfuls for lotion! | GENRAL::KILGORE | The Desert Rat | Sun Jul 03 1988 15:44 | 19 |
| The following is also excerpted from the June 1988 issue of SELF magazine:
**Don't** skimp on sunscreen and **do** put it on evenly. Get
slapdash with your lotion, stick or gel, and you sap its protection
power. In fact, researchers claim that Americans apply sunscreen
so thinly that we lose about half its SPF value. We also slather
in some places (nose and face, for instance) and skimp on others
(upper back). To make your sunscreen live up to its SPF, it's got
to go on thick enough to leave an allover film you can initially
see and touch. [elsewhere in the article it says to apply 1 shot-
glassful...that's for people with clothes on...we naturists might
think about 1-1/2 shotglass fulls! :-) jk] .... Three other fast
ways to dash sun worries: First, apply sunscreen 30 minutes before
going out in the sun. Cool, dry skin binds sunscreen best. Second,
super-dose face, ears, neck, upper chest, arms and backs of hands,
where roughly 90 percent of the most common skin cancers occur. And
third, recommends Dr. Pathak (a photoprotection expert at Harvard
Medical School), don't forget to reapply sunscreen at least once
every hour.
|
30.9 | any benefit to taking PABA internally? | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Mon Jul 04 1988 12:18 | 5 |
|
Does anyone know anything about taking PABA internally? Specifically,
whether or not it can protect one from sunburn?
CQ
|
30.10 | Seems to do a little | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Just remember one thing | Mon Jul 04 1988 17:13 | 7 |
| I've tried it; it seems to help some.
If you try it, be sure to use enough. You need about 1000 mg/day
to get any effect (according to articles I've read on the subject).
Elizabeth
|
30.11 | Better Be sure! RED FEET! | HPSTEK::SHERMAN | | Mon Jul 18 1988 18:18 | 16 |
| RE: SPF (SUN PROTECTION FACTOR)
May I suggest that you get SPF 15 provided (as Consumer Reports
indicated) you put enough of the stuff on. And the RIGHT AMOUNT
(as shown in a photo) was just about a hand-full. And that was
the right amount for someone clad with a normal bathing suit.
Since I have a heckuva time getting the suntan lotion on in the
first place, I always use SPF 30 with the hopes of getting at least
SPF 15 or so.
My problem is feet! One walk in the sand and you must replace the
guk right away or ZIT! You've got red feet tonight, tomorrow, and
tomorrow after that! Proof: Here I'll put my foot up in front
of the screen. There: See? Red Feet!
Stan/
|
30.12 | SPF Table | HPSTEK::SHERMAN | | Mon Jul 18 1988 18:31 | 37 |
| I'm back! (Like the dinasaurs!)
Anyway: Whilst at Atika, I ran a little Cancer Screening Center
and gave out a bulletin which including the following.
Help yourself.
Stan/
SUN PROTECTION FACTOR (SPF) GUIDE
Skin Sunburn/Tanning Minimum Recommended SPF
Type Pigmentation History 4 Hrs 3 Hrs 2 Hrs 1Hr.
I Very Fair Skin; Burn/No Tan 30 24 20 15
Freckling; blond,
red, or brown hair
II Fair Skin; blond Burns easily 20 15 15 8
Red, or brown hair tans minimally
III Brown hair and eyes Burns moderate- 15 15 8 6
Darker skin ely tans gradual-
(Light Brown) ly & Uniformly
IV Light Brown Skin Burns Minimally; 15 8 6 4
V Brown skin;dark Burns minimally Minimum data use Type IV
hair and eyes
VI Brow-black skin; Never burns, Minimum data use Type IV
Dark hair & Eyes Deeply pigmented
(black)
|
30.13 | RE: .6 Warning! | MARX::BELLEROSE | | Tue Jul 19 1988 13:16 | 14 |
| RE: .6
"Sunburn does not promote adverse effects except for short term
pain and the esthetics of the situation..."
I've seen a program on TV that claimed one *really* bad burn
dramatically increases your chances of skin cancer. They talked
to one girl who got such a burn in Rio de Janaro (spelling?) and
had since had over 40 (!!) cases of skin cancer that had had to
be removed.
Be carefull of *bad* burns!
Kb
|
30.14 | Anti-sunburn pill info | MOIRA::FAIMAN | A goblet, a goblet, yea, even a hoop | Mon Aug 15 1988 08:56 | 40 |
| I've copied this note from its original location, because of
its relevance to this topic.
-Neil (moderator)
================================================================================
Note 94.10 Insect Repellent 10 of 14
WILMER::SKOGLUND 29 lines 2-AUG-1988 14:52
-< just a little info goes along way >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
geez the first time i browse thru this file i wind up being able
to help... isn't that special..
the anti sunburn pill someone referred to is known as p.a.b.a. or
for those chemists, hi , para amino benzoic acid. taken at about
200 mgs. a day for a couple of weeks it will absorb almost all u.v.
in the dermal layer of the skin where paba concentrations are highest.
dr. durk pearson and dr. sandy shaw have demonstrated paba's
effectiveness by walking across the california desert wearing nothing
but a loin cloth and sandals with no visible burn after 10 hours
of exposure......! paba by the way is the same u.v. absorber used
in most sun tan lotions... only you get to take it
internally...albino's are frequently given paba for uv burn protection
since they have no ability to produce melanin...
as for skeeters.... first skeeters are attracted to certain pheromone
compounds excreted thru our skin... they have receptors for a compound
that has it's origin in blood! some people excrete more than others
and some foods exacerbate the condition... like banana's and certain
nuts and... huh? i can't remember everything...but it will come
back to me ... the reason bleach works is that sodium hypochlorite
is an oxidizer and as such will oxidize the organic compound. once
oxidized the compound is no longer capable of stimulating their
receptors... all other perfume type lotions or repellants just
try to mask the attracting human pheromone! skin so soft works because
it has citronella oil in it.... albeit a low percenatge but if you
use strait oil of citronella the results are better! and as for
b- vitamins.... there is just too much for me to list here..but
suffice to say there is more misinformation than anything else.
lars
|
30.15 | Topic cross-reference -> 77.* | MOIRA::FAIMAN | A goblet, a goblet, yea, even a hoop | Mon Aug 15 1988 08:58 | 3 |
| Notes 77.* also discuss sunscreen and sunburn.
-Neil
|
30.18 | Radiation Leak? | MYRTLE::ORME | MadVax | Mon Jun 19 1989 00:13 | 18 |
| Love nude sunbathing but...
With the current media induced crisis re the ozone layer disappearing,
I wonder if it is at all the right thing to do.
It seems that down here in OZ we are going to be the guinea pigs with
respect to the amount of ultra violet radiation that are at present
hitting us. Last summer (we got little sun because of excessive amounts
of rain) the hole in the ozone layer opened up big enough to cover most
of southern OZ. Since we already have the one of the highest rates of
skin cancer, I wonder what is in store for us in the future?
I know of several people who have had skin cancers removed. Will
there come a day when I need one removed from one of the more delicate
areas of my anatomy, just because I have a red skin?
rgds Ted
|
30.19 | Ouch! | GENRAL::KILGORE | We are the People, Earth & Stars | Mon Jun 19 1989 10:36 | 23 |
| >> Love nude sunbathing but...
So do I, but this weekend was the pits! We went to Valley View with a new
friend (it was the yearly party weekend with limited guests, that's why the
trip was not announced in here...sorry) and my arms got fried with SPF 15 in
two hours of exposure. I can't imagine what I might look like if I'd been
hiking nude!
Both my parents have had skin cancer and since my skin is reacting the way
it is, it has got me to wondering about my future prospects in the sun. :-(...
After I got this burn, I kept applying lotion and taking aspirin to take
away the pain and swelling that accompanied the burn but it didn't help. I
stayed in the shade the rest of the day if I was nude and was fully dressed if
in the sun. Sunday morning, while eating breakfast outside the van, I felt
the intensity of the sun to be so bad, I ended up putting on a long sleeve
long-john shirt that was a light color, to shade my arms.
Needless to say I did not get one minute of nude sunbathing in this weekend.
What a bummer! Still had fun though soaking in the warm water at night with
no sun out, and just relaxing, reading, conversing with new friends, and
hiking. The simple pleasures in life! :-)
Judy
|
30.16 | PABA-free lotion recommendation? | GENRAL::KILGORE | We are the People, Earth & Stars | Mon Jun 19 1989 11:03 | 7 |
| Well, as you can tell in note 177.1 my `laying out in the sun' days may be
coming to an end soon. Besides the intense sun and the sun-blocking action
of SPF 15 not working for me my skin, is breaking out in a rash. I'm wondering
if it is reacting to the PABA in the Coppertone we use. Can anyone recommend
a high SPF lotion that is PABA-free?
Judy
|
30.20 | *This* is midsummer | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Tue Jun 20 1989 12:49 | 8 |
| Yes, we tend to think of July and August as being mid-summer -- it's
certainly hotter then than it is now -- but (as the sunburn I got this
weekend reminds me) it's worth remembering that tomorrow is the summer
solstice (in the northern hemisphere), when you can get the absolute
maximum of radiation exposure in the minimum amount of time. As far
as sun exposure is concerned, mid-August is equivalent to mid-April!
-Neil
|
30.21 | Sunny ... Reddy ... Hurty!!!! SSSSSSSSSST! | HPSTEK::SHERMAN | | Tue Jun 20 1989 15:03 | 16 |
| Hi Gang:
Remember the basic premise of Naturism: You wear clothes to protect
yourself from the environment. Generally, this time of year, it is the
coo coo ideas of the opts that force clothing on people. But, as we
just saw, the sun can have its effect on things, also!
Is that the meaning of Clothed in the Sun? --)!!!!!!
Personally, I use SPF 30! I may be a cotton tail, but I can sit on it
without cottoning lotion! Also, if I put it on a little thinner, I can
get SPF 15 or 20.
I smell something (one?) burning!
Stan/
|
30.17 | high SPF sun block numbers | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Wed Jun 21 1989 06:23 | 15 |
|
Whilst not directly a propos of Naturism, it is relevant to the
subject of going out in the sun...
[Information from a BBC radio broadcast] apparently sun protection
factors are measured according to a quite different methodology
in America and elsewhere. In Europe a DIN (German standard) applies.
The net result is that SPF numbers on American products will be
higher (often much higher) than on European products. Apparently
the differences are only significant above SPF 10, but a product
that would get an SPF of 20 to 40 in the States might only be rated
15 in Europe...
/. Ian .\
|
30.22 | uv absorbers, put in inside too! | WILMER::SKOGLUND | | Wed Jun 21 1989 14:16 | 17 |
| a suggestion
dr.durk pearson did the research and self testing on the following
drug.. para-amino benzoic acid or more commonly called paba. taken
internally at about 200 mgs a day for a couple of weeks it will
prevent you from sun burning.... dr. pearson took paba for some time
and then clad only in sandals and a loincloth walked for some 6 hours
across death valley in the worst part of the day.... no sunburn...!
and yes paba is the uv absorber/screen used in suntan lotions... only
you take it internally... most good health food stores carry it...
and while your there read up on it in a book "life extension" by dr.
pearson and dr sandy shaw.....
this put the shade on where the sun don't usually shine...
hope it helps you sun worshippers..
lars
|
30.23 | PABA-free lotion is great! | GENRAL::KILGORE | We are the People, Earth & Stars | Wed Jul 05 1989 12:10 | 18 |
| I found a sunblock that is PABA-free at our local health food store made by
Aubrey Organics that is called Ultra 15 Natural Herbal Sunblock SPF 15. On
the label it says it has No Synthetic PABA, Protects Skin from UVA and UVB
Rays, and contains Rosa Mosqueta (almost looked too much like mosquito!) and
Aloe Vera.
Says to re-apply every half hour or as needed. Came out of the tube and
applied as white lotion but soaked into the skin pretty readily to become
colorless. Was non-greasy and lasted all day for me....on parts that are
already tanned (like arms and face). I did not have one bit of problem with
a rash, which was fantastic! :-)
Did notice Avon has come out with children's versions of suntan lotions (with
Snoopy and Friends pictured on the containers) and a couple are PABA-free.
Will try it also after it arrives. The Avon lotion will probably be more
available for more people.
Judy
|
30.24 | Non-PABA available in Drug Stores | CURIE::BBARRY | | Thu Jul 06 1989 17:46 | 15 |
| Non-PABA sun screens are the "in thing" this year. This is because of the
latest indications are that both UVA and UVB can be harmful and PABA has been
known to cause rashes. PABA only filters out UVA.
This weekend there were at least 5 brands of non-PABA sunscreens at my
local drug store. Most of the non-PABA sunscreens are also waterproof, because
one of the active ingredients is waterproof. I tried the Vaseline Intensive
Care Sunscreen (available in SPF 2-24) and can personally attest to it being
waterproof. I have the strangest looking sunburn, because I used waterproof
sunscreen on part of my body and regular on other parts and went swimming at
the ledges. If anyone is up there on Saturday you can see it(I am the one with
the Digital Survival Kit Backpack)
Brian
|
30.25 | Hope you haven't just eaten... | GENRAL::KILGORE | Coyote Clan Member | Thu Sep 21 1989 12:24 | 73 |
| The follow is from the October 1989 issue of _Outside_.
(reprinted without permission)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Death by Amoeba
The Frisco Hot Springs in southwestern New Mexico looks inviting.
So much so that a few who visit the translucent pool pay much
attention to the small sign posted on the bank: WATERS OF THIS
HOT SPRING CONTAIN NATURALLY OCCURRING ORGANISMS PROVEN TO BE
HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH. DO NOT ALLOW THIS WATER TO ENTER YOUR
NOSE.
This enigmatic warning, *which could apply to just about any of
the worlds hot springs* (emphasis mine), is a masterpiece of
understatement. Two years ago, Daniel Young, a healthy, fit
30-year-old from Tucson, took a dip in the Frisco pool. Less
than one week later he was dead, victim of a little-known critter
called *Amoeba naegleria fowleri*.
"There's a certain irony to the whole thing," says Young's brother
Dale. "He went to the hot spring for his health, and it killed
him."
The amoebas, which thrive in warm, fresh water, enter the body
through the nasal passages. They nibble their way up through the
olfactory nerve until, as Govinda Visvesvara, a research
microbiologist at the Centers for Disease Control, grimly puts
it, "They completely destroy the brain.
"The amoebas need something to live on - protein," he says. "In
the outdoor environment, the eat bacteria. When they come into the
human system, they don't have any natural food, so they eat brain
cells. They chew off bits and pieces."
It's an ugly and sure way to go. Victims experience a searing
headache and fever, followed by loss of sight, smell, and
coordination. They slip into a coma and usually die within five
to seven days. Since the disease was first diagnosed 30 years ago,
65 cases have been reported in the United States, and only one
person - a nine-year-old girl - has survived. The most recent
victim was a 31-year-old Las Vegas man who died after a dip in a
hot spring at the Lake Mead Recreation Area last summer.
The actual number of deaths may be higher, however, since state
health departments don't require doctors to report deaths from
disease. That's assuming that doctors can diagnose it correctly.
"It's possible that many cases go undetected," says Visvesvara.
Fatalities have also occurred in Australia, Mexico, Peru, Japan,
India, China, and the Soviet Union.
"It's ubiquitous," Visvesvara continues. "The amoeba almost
everywhere, all over the world - in unchlorinated fresh water, in
soil, in all kinds of environments." But it's the toasty warmth
of a hot spring that sends *A. naegleria fowleri* into a
reproduction frenzy.
Treatment is frighteningly unreliable. Potent antiparasitic drugs
might kill the amoeba, but only if taken in the first day or two
of the infection. "It's such an aggressive, virulent organism,"
says David Siegel, the neurologist who treated Young. "Often the
patient is moribund before the diagnosis is made. The brain is a
very unforgiving organ. Once it's inflamed, you lose it and the
games up."
Still, your chances of contracting the disease are slim. In
Florida, a popular state for freshwater sports, the estimated risk
is less than one in a million. "There's a very small chance that
people who use hot springs will contract the disease," says
Visvesvara, "but the chance is indeed there, and they should
swim at their own risk." Our advice: get yourself some nose clips.
|
30.26 | A part of nature I'd rather avoid.... | CSC32::GORTMAKER | whatsa Gort? | Thu Sep 21 1989 22:06 | 6 |
| Thanks for posting that Judy thats kinda scary info but very good to
know. Seven days... I can't get over how fast it exacts it's toll and
the hideous fashion almost like something E.A. Poe might have written.
I've never owned nose plugs but it might be time to change...
-j
|
30.27 | Yuck, yuck, yuck! | GENRAL::KILGORE | Coyote Clan Member | Fri Sep 22 1989 00:53 | 8 |
| Oops! I forgot to mention the article was sent to me by another Naturism
reader. I give him credit for all the typing! I got real grossed out
thinking about something eating on someone's brains. Yuck!!
Now where are my nose clips?!? ;-)
Judy
|
30.28 | You KNOW She's RIGHT! | HPSTEK::SHERMAN | | Wed Apr 04 1990 14:56 | 26 |
| RIGHT ON JUDY!!!
You don't know how I ache when I see perfectly beautiful people frying
themselves in the summer sun! Those ultraviolet rays are for the birds
(when feathered, of course).
Cancer is something we never like to think about. You know that for
sure, dear Lady. But the best of us will encounter it without notice
and then look back to the day when that first cell came into being. If
we were our own cause, then it must be a terrible thing to realize.
So please listen to Judy. Please take care of yourselves. Please stay
around to spoil your grandchildren absolutely ROTTEN! ... and your
great-grandchildren also!
The Higher the SPF the better. However, there was talk of a problem
with PABA containing sun-protection products. I read a newspaper
account which indicated that PABA, when combined with one of the more
common ingredients in sun-protection products, may result in possible
carcinogens.
So keep the sun away. Don't give cancer a fighting chance to gain a
foothold in/on/or around your body. Protect the kids, too!
Stan/
|
30.29 | | GENRAL::KILGORE | Coyote Clan Member | Wed Apr 04 1990 16:30 | 10 |
| Well, my Dad was told a couple weeks ago he has some MORE skin cancer....this
time on his ears. So the doctor cut the areas out and told him to use lotion
ALL THE TIME! Thing is he doesn't think about putting any on until he's just
about to step out the door. Most lotion is supposed to be put on 20 minutes
prior to exposure.
According to the doctors, they were successful in removing all of the cancer
this time also.
Judy
|
30.30 | WEAR THAT SUNSCREEN! | CSC32::K_JOHNSON | It's only natural! | Tue Jul 24 1990 00:57 | 17 |
| My 2 cents:
My S/O is an Ear, Nose, and Throat Dr. In addition to the regular
tonsels & tubes, she routinely sees OVER 200 cases/year of skin cancer.
In nearly every case, sun exposure has been identified as a primary
factor. The most deadly type of skin cancer, Malinoma, is also one
of the most lethal cancers of any type, and claims several THOUSAND
lives each year. Malinoma has been directly linked to sun exposure
in numerous studies, and those who are fair of skin and hair, and,
in particular, those who additionally have green eyes, are especially
at risk. Ironically, as much as I love the sun, I fit this example of
a high risk individual, and so must be doubly carefull, especially
at this high Colorado altitude!
Kevin
|
30.31 | Medications and Photoallergic reactions | GENRAL::KILGORE | Proud to be Cherokee | Fri Nov 16 1990 14:52 | 33 |
| Reprinted without permission from a Dear Policyowner brochure from the
Kansas City Life Insurance Company for 1990.
Taking in the Sun?
------------------
Is a vacation to some sunny location in your plans? Here's yet another
sunburn warning. If you are taking certain medications, you'd better not
plan on taking in the sun.
Studies at the University of Arizona have discovered at least 25 antibiotics
and sulfa drugs that heighten sensitivity to sunlight, causing sunburn -- even
blisters and welts. Worse yet, average sunscreen, which is designed to block
ultraviolet-B rays, is nearly powerless against the ultraviolet-A rays which
cause photoallergic reactions.
Check through the following list of the most common culprits, before you pack
your bags.
Tetracycline (for acne)
Chlorpropamide or tolbutamide (for diabetes)
Sulfatrimethoprim (for urinary track infection)
Diuretics or water pills (for high blood pressure)
If you suspect any of your medications, it would be wise to ask your
pharmacist or physician whether anything you currently are taking might
cause photoallergy. Even if you stop taking the medication, some are
known to remain in your system for days, even weeks. Your pharmacist
can suggest a sunscreen that blocks ultraviolet-A as well as ultraviolet-B.
And when you pack, be sure to include a wide brimmed hat and long-sleeved
shirts in your vacation wardrobe. With these few precautions, instead of
coming home with sun-damaged skin, you'll return with a sunny smile and warm
memories!
|
30.32 | now what? | SUBSYS::NEUMYER | sun your buns | Fri Mar 22 1991 14:30 | 7 |
|
Any comments on the latest study that indicates many sunscreens may
contain an ingredient that actually promotes skin cancer?
ed
|
30.33 | Wear a patch to detect how much sun you are getting | GENRAL::KILGORE | Ah, those Utah canyons..... | Tue Mar 10 1992 11:21 | 65 |
| <<< SICVAX::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DOWVISION_TEST.NOTE;1 >>>
-< DowVision Test >-
================================================================================
Note 35.3 Medical Technology 3 of 10
SDSVAX::SWEENEY 58 lines 9-MAR-1992 13:37
-< NEW WEARABLE BADGE LETS YOU SEE UV... AND SEEING IS BELIEVING >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright � Dow Jones & Co. 1992
Source: Press Release News Wire
Headline: NEW WEARABLE BADGE LETS YOU SEE UV... AND SEEING IS BELIEVING
Time: Mar 09 1992 1339
Story:
LOS ANGELES, March 4 /PRNewswire/ -- The following was released today by
XYTRONYX Inc.:
With the growing ozone depletion and the associated increasing health risks
from overexposure to the sun's ultraviolet (UV) rays, it is apparent that
people must take additional measures to safeguard their well being. Until now
people have accepted the old adage of "What we can't see won't hurt us" and
have relied on guess work with no convenient way to detect and monitor the
harmful levels of invisible UV rays.
Now, there's the newly developed SUN ALERT(TM) ultraviolet warning badge...
the only product available that detects, monitors and actually shows users
their daily cumulative exposure to the sun's UV rays... serving as a "personal
visible alert system" to warn against the risks of UV overexposure and painful
sunburn.
A single-use, paper-thin adhesive badge about the size of a quarter, SUN
ALERT can be safely worn on clothing or directly on the skin by all ages.
Designed for both adults and children, when exposed to the sun, the badge
changes color, from blue to green to yellow to orange indicating the level of
UV exposure received.
Developed by XYTRONYX Inc. in San Diego, Calif., SUN ALERT has received the
"Seal of Recommendation" from The Skin Cancer Foundation and is recommended by
dermatologists. As a valuable aid for fair- skinned as well as darker-skinned
individuals, SUN ALERT is effective on bright sunny days, as well as less
obvious cloudy, hazy days, thereby taking the guess work out of knowing when
to take additional precautionary action.
According to The Skin Cancer Foundation, there are over 600,000 new cases of
skin cancer diagnosed per year, and approximately one out of every six
Americans will develop some form of skin cancer during his/her lifetime.
Furthermore, a blistering sunburn experience before the age of 20 may double
one's chances of developing "malignant melanoma" (a form of skin cancer).
As a companion for sunscreens, SUN ALERT provides concerned parents with
reassurance that their children's delicate skin can be monitored from
excessive UV exposure. As a "signal" to athletes and spectator sport lovers,
SUN ALERT givers early warning to take protective measures... and seniors,
ever mindful of the cumulative effects of a lifetime of UV rays, appreciate
SUN ALERT's practical reminder. SUN ALERT gives new meaning to the expression
"seeing is believing."
SUN ALERT badge comes in three types: (1) Regular Badge (for general use),
(2) SPF 15+ (for use when applying sunscreens of SPF 15 or greater, and (3)
Kid's Badge (for use when applying kids' sunscreens of SPF 15 or greater). SUN
ALERT is available nationally in drug stores, discount stores and supermarkets
for a suggested retail price of $3.99 (five badges per box).
NOTE TO EDITOR: Photographs (black & white/color) and press kits available
on request.
/CONTACT: Alvin Kupperman of Productivity P.R., 213-962-3944, Fax
213-962-7846, 7080 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 203, Los Angeles, CA 90028 for
XYTRONYX/
13:24 EST
categoryIndustry I/BTC I/MTC
categorySubject N/ENV N/PDT
categoryMarketSector M/TEC
categoryGeographic R/MA
categoryCompany XYX
|
30.34 | Read Consumer Reports first | TLE::PETERSON | Bob, GEM | Mon Mar 23 1992 11:53 | 5 |
| Get another opinion besides the Dow Jones & Co press release. Read a recent CR.
They feel the device is worse than worthless, it is dangerous.
\bob
|