[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference cookie::notes$archive:cd_v1

Title:Welcome to the CD Notes Conference
Notice:Welcome to COOKIE
Moderator:COOKIE::ROLLOW
Created:Mon Feb 17 1986
Last Modified:Fri Mar 03 1989
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1517
Total number of notes:13349

1476.0. "Yamaha CDX-910U - no filters?!" by FGVAXL::LAING (Soft-Core-Cuddler*Jim Laing*261-2194) Fri Jan 13 1989 07:23

    A recent ad in one of the digital audio mag's, on the back cover
    I believe, had and ad for Yamaha's CDX-910U, which sports a "feature"
    called Hi-Bit, which allows you to SWITCH OFF the analog filters!
    The ad goes on to explain that this allows "crystal-clear" sound.
    From all the discussion on filtering here, I'd say that the quality
    of the filtering, and how it's done, is critical ... such that going
    with NO filter seems like a BAD thing!  Is this marketing hype or
    are there times when using NO filter would provide for better sound?
    My intuition says that w/o the filter, the high end would be too
    much, too "cutting".  Comments?  Anyone heard one of these?
    
    	-Jim
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1476.1My vote: it's hypeRETORT::RONTue Jan 17 1989 10:1525
The analog filter's job is to remove the switching artifacts, which
occur at sampling frequency harmonics. When the player 'oversamples'
at X8, the lowest frequency component is around 350 KHz. A correctly
designed filter would be way over the audible range, anyway - that's
one of the biggest selling point for higher and higher
'oversampling' rates. 

At X8 'oversampling', even with a bonafide filter out of the way,
the analog circuitry itself (plus the cables, the preamp and the
power amp) acts as a low pass filter. Switching out the specific
filter is hype, because, regardless of what's built into the player,
the filtering action is still there. 

Depending on your system, a 350 KHz component in the signal could be
real bad if you have a rectifying junction somewhere (added noise)
or if a section somewhere does have good RF response (overload, 
leading to distortion). 

Besides, who says filtering sounds bad? Listen to the Yamaha
CDX-910U with 'high bit' ON and OFF through a good system and see if
you can tell the difference. 

-- Ron

1476.2DEMING::AUGUSTINEWe Will SurviveTue Jan 17 1989 10:595
    I wonder if that is for direct digital output to an externl 
    D to A filter?
    
    jeff
    
1476.3HARLEY::DAVEit's tee time !!!Tue Jan 17 1989 11:415
    
    I have a cdx 910 u and it sounds pretty good. have not switched
    the filters on/off to check out the difference.
    
    Dave
1476.4No Filter in Digital OutputUSRCV1::THOMPSONPPaul Thompson, Rochester, NYThu Jan 19 1989 15:107
    Re .2
    
    The direct digital output is before any of the oversampling circuitry
    or filters.  If you choose to use the direct digital output, all
    of the oversampling or extra bits in the world won't make a difference
    because you have bypassed them.