Conference cookie::notes$archive:cd_v1

1388.0. "not supposed to be *that* much of a rip-off" by PSW::WINALSKI (There is no 'c' in 'supersede') Sun Nov 13 1988 13:22

Regarding the note attached below (accidentally entered as a reply in the
U2 "Rattle & Hum" discussion):

My copy of THE FINAL RIPOFF has two discs with different material on each one.
I suspect that you've fallen victim to a mistake on their production line,
where a group of disc 1's accidentally got labeled disc 2 (or vice versa).
Anyway, the album is not intended to be that way--your copy *is* defective.

--PSW

================================================================================
             <<< COOKIE::DISK$SYSTEM_3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CD.NOTE;1 >>>
                    -< Welcome to the CD Notes Conference >-
================================================================================
Note 1323.14                  * U2 * rattle and hum                     14 of 16
HPSCAD::WALL "I don't believe it."                   14 lines  11-NOV-1988 07:17
                     -< Monty Python's *The Final Ripoff* >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    
    Has anyone else bought Monty Python's *The Final Ripoff* double
    CD set and discovered that although the discs are labeled differently,
    they contain the same material?
    
    I've just come across a second set, exchanged for the first (which
    I thought was defective) and once again, two discs with the same
    stuff on it.
    
    Am I just not getting the joke here?  Is it Python's way of getting
    back for having *Matching Tie and Handkerchief* be a three-sided
    album.
    
    DFW