T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1322.1 | $299 | ATLACT::GIBSON_D | | Fri Sep 09 1988 17:01 | 8 |
| re -1
the standard discount price seems to be $299 right now (at least
in Atlanta). And I agree with -1, being able to select from 5 disks
and play your favorite tracks is a super feature -- after having
it I wouldn't be without it now. BTW, for anyone in Atlanta, look
in the weekender section of the Saturday Journal for coupons from
MUSIC, MUSIC, MUSIC that gives you $4 off any number of CDs priced
$12.99 or higher -- super deals.
|
1322.2 | a wonderful little machine... | TOOK::C_PEREZ | The InFAMous Eight | Fri Sep 09 1988 20:05 | 19 |
| RE: .0 on Sony CDP-C50
Well I have owned mine for several months now and have ejoyed
it very much... I too purchased it for $299 mail order. I have
seen it cheaper, about $280 in NJ where sales tax is ~6.5% so
it would be about the same price...
FYI... If you read carefully you'll see that Shuffle Play is
really a random play with > one disk in tray. It picks
another disk and then picks a song from that new disk.
There is no record of what songs where played. With
five disks it's unlikely to get a duplicate play in a
short span of time, but it's happend to me!
When only one disk is in the tray it acts just like the
all the Sony single tray models with Shuffle Play. It
will pick a random order to play the songs and then stop.
With > one disk you continue to play forever and ever and ever....
Craig
|
1322.3 | problems with the CDP-C50 | TALLIS::DOCKSER | | Mon Sep 12 1988 15:49 | 37 |
| Recently, I too purchased a CDP-C50 (from Fretter- $300 including tax
and a four-year 100% warrantee). Although I am pleased with the unit
for the most part, I am having some problems with it. The first track
of one of my CDs (Seals and Crofts Greatest Hits) cannot be played
unless I go to the second track and play the first track backwards and
then forwards (The first second or so can't be played). When the unit
tries to play this first track from the begining all that happens is
the disc spins and spins - no elapsed time appears on the display and
the circle around the disc number doesn't flash (flashing is how the
unit is supposed to tell you that you have a bad disc). This disc has
no problems on my CD-5 nor on any other model that I have tried. The
second problem has only occured (so far) on my Joni Mitchel album -
Court and Spark. If I program the unit to play the second track and
then any other track, after completing the second track it always plays
the first second of the third track and then goes on to what I
selected to play after the second track.
I wasn't sure if the problem was my unit was defective or if the design
of the '50 was just flawed so I went back to the store with these two
CDs and tried their CDP-C50 and another Sony model. The problems
mentioned above occured consistently on the CDP-C50 but never on the
other model. I tried the Seals and Crofts disc on yet another model and
the first track played without hesitation.
Have any other CDP-C50 owners had problems like these? I wonder if
these discs are flawed and the '50 doesn't handle the flaws as well as
other models or if the unit itself has a design flaw and the these
(normal) discs just bring the problem into the light.
Anyway, I still have two weeks to decide if I want to keep the unit
or not. If I run into any more problems than these, the unit is going
right back. Otherwise I have to decide if the benifits of the player
outweigh the problems I have with two of my discs. Anyone have any
suggestions for other good multi-disc players?
-Ken
|
1322.4 | C50/70 did it to me as well! | RAINBO::LONG | | Tue Sep 13 1988 12:26 | 11 |
| > for the most part, I am having some problems with it. The first track
> of one of my CDs (Seals and Crofts Greatest Hits) cannot be played
Sounds very similar to a problem I was having with the C70; see note
1312, and its replies.
I too am now in the market for another multi-disc player.
Not too impressed with Sony CD players, I am...
Rich (I think the Pioneer looks good)
|
1322.5 | Maybe I'm lucky? (naaaaah!) | HPSCAD::WALL | I don't believe it. | Tue Sep 13 1988 15:39 | 6 |
|
Geez, mine runs like a clock. Shuffle works fine, never mistracks...
I've got a CDP-C70.
DFW
|
1322.6 | Haven't heard a bad review of it yet!!! | EUCLID::OWEN | | Wed Sep 14 1988 10:01 | 9 |
| I got mine about a year ago.(right when the 4x oversampling model
came out). It's quite a tough machine. I've never had a problem
with misstracking. I "abuse" it quite a bit. I go to school in
Boston, and the CD player made is home and back for vacations quite
a few times
It sure beats the hell out of those 6-disc cartrige players.
I love it and highly recomend it to anyone considering buying a
CD player in the inexpensive but not cheap catigory!!!($250-350)
|
1322.7 | Can't agree with you there!!! | DELNI::GILE | The Time and Space Oddity | Wed Sep 14 1988 10:20 | 14 |
| re .6 "it sure beats the hell out of the six disc cartridge
players"
Why???? I have a Pioneer PD M40, and have had zero problems with
it. The random play never selects the same track, I have had no
mistracking problems with it, and the cartridges are easy to deal
with and store. My wife even dropped one, and the 1st tray broke,
but trays 2-6 have continued to work fine, and even random play
knows it isn't there and doesn't go to disc 1.
I don't know what your problem is, but my bottom of the line
Pioneer has performed flawlessly.
Wayne
|
1322.8 | Another disagreement | CSC32::J_PARSONS | Like Lesser Birds on the 4 Winds... | Wed Sep 14 1988 12:03 | 11 |
| Also re .6 "it sure beats the hell out of the six disc cartridge
players"
Please start your reasons for believing this. My Pioneer PDM-500
is far superior in almost every category to the Sony CDP-C50 I had
for about 2 days. The only possible thing I'd think you could hold
against the Pioneer is the (very slightly) longer access time to
get from disk to disk vs. the Sony. This is more than compensated
for by the brain-damaged shuffle-play algorithm the CDP-C50 uses
vs. the Pioneer, which will never repeat a selection when doing
random play.
|
1322.9 | More fuel for the fire... | ATSE::DMILLER | Cecil B D'MilleR, the Esoteric | Wed Sep 14 1988 12:27 | 19 |
|
Also re .6 "it sure beats the hell out of the six disc cartridge
players"
I also have a Pioneer. A PDM-60, and I'm very happy with it. I
didn't like the Sony method because the carousel only spins one
way. Going from disk 5 to disk 4 takes an extremely long time.
The Pioneer is far more consistent in the time it takes to switch
disks.
I keep 2 cartridges loaded up, and my fiance� can have 3-4 hours
of music by inserting a cartridge and hitting random play. (As
long as I don't leave the equalizer switched to be playing the
cassette deck --- she hasn't figured out how to switch it back)
And finally one last laugh at the shuffle play algorithm. Do it
right or don't do it at all.
-Dave
|
1322.10 | Another Satisfied Owner of a Pioneer | DELNI::TRUSLOW | | Wed Sep 14 1988 12:39 | 10 |
| I, too, have owned a Pioneer with the 6-disc cartridge (PD-50?)
for almost 2 years and have had only very minor problems with mis-
tracking -- most of which vanished as soon as I cleaned the CD
thoroughly. Granted, it's NOT a magnificent high-fidelity component,
but it seems to hold up very well mechanically. And since I listen
to lots of music on "private" labels (i.e., recorded by tape recorders
hidden under overcoats in people's laps), that aspect isn't really
of much concern to me. CDs still beat 78s and most of the old mono
33 1/3s.
|
1322.11 | Mechanicals are getting better | SNDCSL::SMITH | IEEE-696 | Wed Sep 14 1988 13:41 | 12 |
| re: .9
The Sony CDP-C70 does turn the turntable in the reverse direction,
in fact swaps disks and finds tracks very quickly.
> And finally one last laugh at the shuffle play algorithm. Do it
> right or don't do it at all.
Hear, hear! If only the CDP-C70 had gotten it right, or if only
they had used a real processor and a 2764..... :+)
Willie
|
1322.12 | re - the last many | ATLACT::GIBSON_D | | Wed Sep 21 1988 16:57 | 2 |
| Has anyone who has had problems with the shuffle play or track 1
taken their player in for warranty service to see if it can be fixed?
|
1322.13 | Fixing the problems(?) | TALLIS::DOCKSER | | Thu Sep 22 1988 10:05 | 25 |
| (Please refer to .3 for the problems I've had with this unit)
I brought the unit back to Fretter yesterday and spoke with the repair
person there. He said that according to his coworker (who was in the
back room) this problem couldn't be fixed, its a flaw with the design.
Sony claims that they don't know of such a design flaw (but then again
they claim that they don't know of the skipping D-5 problem that
recurrently appears in this notes file). They suggest that my unit has
an alignment problem and can be fixed.
It puzzles me that one of the problems (many times in program mode the
unit plays part of a selection that wasn't programmed before it goes to
the next programmed track) is so evident on my machine and on the demo
at Fretter, and yet, most people who have the unit don't seem to have
this problem. It may be that my unit and the demo unit were both from
the same bad lot (made on a monday, perhaps).
Anyway, I returned the unit and purchased the Pioneer PDM-500. So
far I am pleased with this model (although I've only had it for one
night).
P.S. - The shuffle play problem of playing the same selections over
and over is a design flaw and can't be fixed.
|
1322.14 | re -.1 | TALLIS::DOCKSER | | Thu Sep 22 1988 11:16 | 10 |
| When I said that I discussed the "problem" with Fretter and the "design
flaw" with Sony I meant that I discussed both the Track 1 (unit
wouldn't play the first track on a disc) problem AND the program mode
(playing parts of unprogrammed tracks) problem with each of these
parties. Fretter said these problems can't be fixed, Sony said that
they could be.
Sorry for any confusion.
-Ken
|