[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference cookie::notes$archive:cd_v1

Title:Welcome to the CD Notes Conference
Notice:Welcome to COOKIE
Moderator:COOKIE::ROLLOW
Created:Mon Feb 17 1986
Last Modified:Fri Mar 03 1989
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1517
Total number of notes:13349

1212.0. "Carver DTL-200 Mk II vs. DBX DX5" by EXIT26::PAGE (Senator Page) Wed Jun 01 1988 11:46

        
        My Brother-In-Law was gracious enough to lend me his Yamaha
        CA-810 amplifier, so that my wife and I could take the CD
        plunge.
        
        For a variety of reasons, the CD we buy must come from
        Lechmere.  After looking at at the Woburn store offerings, I
        have tentatively narrowed my selection to the Carver DTL-200
        Mk II or a DBX DX5.  The Carver was not hooked up, so I'll
        be ear-testing elsewhere.  They both quad oversample, have
        dual DAs and adequate random programming (12 Carver, 16 DBX).
        I am not interested in changers, and don't mind the single
        disk scenario.  Sonicly, the Carver features a switchable
        "Digital Time Lens" that compensates for some deficiencies
        with source material, while the DBX offers 3 signal processing
        controls that may be switched in or out (Compression, Ambience,
        Impact Recovery).
        
        I have a few specific questions, and am interested in general
        feedback on either or both units.
                         
                o The DBX DX5 remote has volume buttons.  I
                  assume this allows one to incrementally reduce
                  the signal delivered to the main output jacks.
                  I know for a fact it controls the headphone
                  level.  Is this correct?
                
                o Are there optical system differences between
                  the two units that are worthy of mention?
                
                o Do the units have multiple independent
                  power supplies?
                
                o Any service issues or war stories?
        
        Thanks in advance for any feedback.  I'd like to make a
        final selection before the weekend.  We can Adopt the Carver
        for $660 or the DBX for $500.
        
        Terry
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1212.1Beware of CarverCSSE32::RHINEJack Rhine - DTN: 381-2439Wed Jun 01 1988 20:104
I have a Carver, the orignal CD player.  I am having problems with it 
mistracking.  No one seems to be able to fix it.  Not even Carver.  When
it works, it sounds great.  Except for the Digital Time Lens, I am more
impressed with my cheap Technics SLP-1.  It is easier to program.
1212.2Mine Works....PARITY::GOSSELINKen @DTN 247-2498Thu Jun 02 1988 06:2618
    Well, to prove there are two sides to every story, I also own a
    first generation Carver CD player (DTL-100). I've had it for 
    ~ 3 years, and it still runs fine. I agree with Jack, it isn't the
    easiest thing to program, especially compared with the new players.
    
    The guts of the Carver were made by Yamaha - dunno if this holds
    true for their 2nd generation players. The digital time lens is
    a nice feature, but I find I don't use it very often - most cd's
    don't require this effect (very good on harsh sounding highs, though).
    
    Although I'm a Carver owner, I'd say save the $150 or so and go
    with the other player. Me, when I replace my player, the next one
    will be a mid to high end Denon. Those players really impressed
    me!
    
    
                                  Ken
    
1212.3Thanks for AdviceEXIT26::PAGESenator PageMon Jun 06 1988 11:3010
    
    I'd like to thank everyone for there input, including not only the
    replies posted here, but several mail messages and a few phone calls.
    
    I went up to the Nashua N.H. Lechmere, and was able to buy a couple
    of CDs for the money saved on sales tax after buying the player.
    
    The sound is GREAT!  Bigger speakers and a beefier Amp are next.
    
    Thanks Again, Terry :-)  ...oh yeah, We adopted the Carver.
1212.4Carver = Yuppie BaitSTAR::JACOBIPaul Jacobi - VAX/VMS DevelopmentMon Jun 06 1988 16:4010
    Ooooh..... You just gotta buy that Carver.  I refuse to even talk to
    people unless they own a SAAB, wear Reebok tennis shoes, AND own a
    Carver stereo!  ;^)
    
    Some buy stereo equipment depending upon the status symbol of the
    NAME.  I tend to purchase stereo equipment based upon the SOUND.
    
    
    							-Paul
    
1212.5QUARK::LIONELWe all live in a yellow subroutineTue Jun 07 1988 10:5713
    Oh well - as Meat Loaf would say, "Two Out of Three Ain't Bad" (I
    don't wear Reeboks)! :-)
    
    I don't recall anyone saying that they bought Carver just because
    of the name (though Carver does have a lot of good products).
    
    Myself, I buy products (of any sort) that perform well and are a good
    value for the money.  In the audio world, Carver products generally
    qualify there.  (And in the automotive world, so do SAABs.)  I see no
    need to belittle anyone simply because they purchased a particular
    brand that is known for competent products.
    
    					Steve
1212.6Marketing 101STAR::JACOBIPaul Jacobi - VAX/VMS DevelopmentTue Jun 07 1988 17:2058
     
    In .4, I attempted to use humor to make a point about the
    price/performance curve of compact disk players.  Most products,
    including compact disk, generally obey a standard price/performance
    curve.  In this case, "performance" could be defined as some set of
    features and hardware specifications.  The arbitrarily drawn graph for
    compact disk players (excluding professional models) show these
    important generalizations:

    	o The minimum price for a fully functional CD player is
          approximately $100
     
    	0 The performance greatly increase between $100 to $300
                                         
    	o Between $300 to $500, the performance level increases slowly

    	o At about $500,  maximum performance has almost been achieved

    	o At above $500, the performance actually decreases, in some cases  	


    The consensus from the previous replies indicate that the Carver CD
    player, falls into the last category.  The demand for this type of
    product is based upon the PERCEPTION of higher quality.  It's a great
    way to increase profit margins.  Carver is not the only one - Protron
    equipment may also fit into this category.  IBM does this all the time! 
    Yuppie often have lots of cash, so its not surprising that there are
    companies out there willing to take it.  I'm not passing judgment on
    Carver, Protron, or yuppies.  I just want to point out a common
    marketing ploy that the previous replies illustrate.

    Only by careful, unbiased analysis of the product can one avoid being
    the sucker that's born every minute.  Good luck.


    							-Paul
    
                                                           
     P|
     E|                                      
     R|                                  /---------------|       /--------
     F|                        /--------/                 \ ----/
     O|                       /                             
     R|                   /--/
     M|                  /
     A|                --/
     N|               /
     C|          ----/    
     E|         |    
      ----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
            ~$100      ~$200      ~$300      ~$400      ~$500      ~$600

                                  P R I C E

    * note : above graph is only an approximation.  It's very difficult to
    draw a curve with a VT200.
      
    
1212.7More than just soundCOEVAX::LEVITTWed Jun 08 1988 10:5216
  Re .6
    
    I'm a little old for the "Y" in yuppie, but I can understand the
    idea of buying the best.  It's really a very conservative way to
    buy.
    
    Both my wife and I work at good jobs, and have figured out long
    ago that you can trade money for time.  It takes a half day off
    of work, or the same amount of "quality" time to get something fixed.
    If you get a very high quality item, you learn to like the feel
    of quality workmanship.  I don't know anything about the Carver
    CD, but I note that .6 takes a pure technoid evaluation of the unit.
    Only the quality of sound is evaluated.  There is no mention of
    pride of ownership, and how it will look for years to come.
    
    Jeff                                     
1212.8No way...FACT01::LAWRENCEJim/Hartford A.C.T.,DTN 383-4523Wed Jun 08 1988 13:3823
    

    R.E. your .6 reply,
    
         
>    	0 The performance greatly increase between $100 to $300
>                                         
>    	o Between $300 to $500, the performance level increases slowly
>
>    	o At about $500,  maximum performance has almost been achieved
>
>    	o At above $500, the performance actually decreases, in some cases  	

 
    You aren't serious about this are you?  I certainly disagree that
    performance maxes out at $500.   My SONY 605ESD is wonderful, but
    the Denon 3300 beats it out at about $1200.  The new SONY 707ESD
    absolutely blows the doors off anything I have heard.  It's $1800.
    Your idea about performance going down over $500 is really strange.
    I totally disagree.
    
    Regards, Jim
    
1212.9last two don't show the bigger pictureREGENT::GETTYSBob Gettys N1BRM 223-6897Mon Jun 13 1988 08:287
                Probably a better description of what happens after a
        certain price (possibly around $500 for CD players) is that two
        lines emerge and for certain brands the quality may in fact dip
        as the price rises; while the other line continues to go up,
        possibly at a slower pace than before for other brands.
                
                /s/     Bob