T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
961.1 | New version of CDP-710 | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Thu Nov 12 1987 20:00 | 18 |
| The Christmas Crutchfield catalog shows the CDP-750. From what
I can tell, it is basically an evolutionary change from the
CDP-710, and has 2X oversampling, not 4X. The big change from the
710 is dual converters. It also has "five way music repeat" -
I'm not sure what the 710 has, but my 510 (a 710 without the keypad
on the front panel) has at least 3-way repeat (disc, track, phrase).
(The other two modes are program and shuffle repeat).
The price is also lower - $319 (heck - I paid more than that for
my 510!)
I am very happy with my CDP-510 - have had it since February. It
has played hundreds of disks with no problems whatsoever. I like
the construction inside - fairly solid, and it is a quiet machine.
You may want to go find my earlier note on the 510 (use DIR/TITLE)
to see what I said about it.
Steve
|
961.2 | Sony, no baloney, Well...!!??? | WORDS::ILYADIS | | Mon Nov 16 1987 15:02 | 52 |
|
I went to Harvey's Audio, Video and Appliances on S. Willow street
in Manchester NH. They had just received a shipment of the Sony
cdp-750 (and CDP-550). The price, well it was $299.88. They didn't
even have a display model up. So I told the salesman to break one
out because I really wanted to buy one. Well sitting there on the
shelf next to where he put the Sony was a Magnavox CDB650 for
$329!!!. ($500 list price on this unit!!)
Finally I got to see one. It was time for a show down. I had
brought along my trusty headphones and three discs I knew real well.
(Rodger Waters, Yes and a collection of Baroque pieces). Well in
the sound department these machines were very close. But the
Magnavox was kinda plasticky and that drawer sounded like it was
about to jump track. Really turned me off. It had some Gee-wiz
type of programming functions (Program your discs into the machine
in non-volatile memory). But how often does that get used? The
Sony was a more solid machine and the controls were more straight
forward.
So what did I do? Well I saved money and got what I felt was a
better machine, the Sony. (7 day money back policy - how can you
lose?)
Well I grabbed one of the boxed units layed down my $300. Got my
$0.12 change and rushed home to hook it up.
I unhooked my trusty 2 1/2 year old Symphonic (Yea, thats right!)
plugged in the Sony, powered it up, slid a disc in, hit play. Well
guess what folks....the Sony was D.O.A. (Dead On Arrival). Well I
sounded off some profanities. That laser couldn't find the encoded
side of a barn.
Well I took it back at lunch today and took home the display model
which hadn't even been fully hooked up yet (Considering I left there
at 4:45 on a sunday nite and got back there at noon on a monday,
nobody touched this unit since I spent 45 minutes with it the nite
before.)
At least I knew this one worked. I would normally chaulk this one
up to bad luck, but my next door neighbor saw me walking in with the
box under my hand and said her boyfriend went through TWO Sony
multidisc changers last week from Lechemere before getting one that
worked. What's up Sony, QC problems, or did this last shipment FALL
off the dock?
A lesson learned? Who knows, but buyer be ware!
Wish me luck,
Nick
|
961.3 | Free lunch?? | FACT01::LAWRENCE | Jim/Hartford A.C.T.,DTN 383-4523 | Tue Nov 17 1987 08:33 | 22 |
|
R.E. your -.1 note about SONY, I know this may be disheartening
but you get what you pay for. I hang out on the AUDIO notesfile
and these issues come up all the time. If you want a player that
both sounds good and is built well, be prepared to spend at least
500 bucks and that's not at list price. The MAGs have a very pleasing
sound for the money but they had to cut corners somewhere and guess
where they did...in quality of construction. The high end SONY
players are very respected in the trade press.
If you spend $300 for a CD unit, it's like buying a mid-priced receiver
instead of separates. No free lunch.
I usually recommend to folks when they ask about units that they
either get a good used one or save up for a good one. You can do
what I did. I didn't want to wait when CD first came out so I bought
a real cheap player for 300 with the idea that I would junk it in
2 or 3 years which is exactly what I did. I bought a Mission 7000
and have been delightfully happy since...
Regards, Jim
|
961.4 | Inexpensive does not = junk | SALEM::MGINGRAS | Roll Over, Chuck Berry! | Tue Nov 17 1987 09:57 | 22 |
| I agree with -.1 but I know that there are large numbers of people
out there who would like a CD player and don't have $500 to spend
on the player alone (I am one of them).
I have owned a Technics SLP-1 for one month shy of 2 1/2 years.
The one problem I had was a mistracking one after having it for
about 4 months (I accidentally turned off the power button while
it was playing a disc and it caused the problem). It was sent back
to the service center (on warranty) and took almost two months to
get back, but it has not had a glitch since.
I use the player a minimum of 10 hours per week. It's been back
for 22 months since the problem. That means this thing has run
flawlessly for (conservatively) the last 880 hours.
The sound and construction may not put it in the Audiophile department,
but it runs like a champ and sounds good enough to please 98% of
the people I know (including myself).
The SLP-1 cost me $299 2 1/2 years ago. I got what I paid for and
I'm pleased.
Marty
|
961.5 | Does power off = send unit back for repair? | FROST::EDSOND | | Wed Nov 18 1987 09:24 | 11 |
| re: Note 961.4
>SALEM::MGINGRAS "Roll Over, Chuck Berry!"
> -< Inexpensive does not = junk >-
I agree with inexpensive does not = junk!
> The one problem I had was a mistracking one after having it for
> about 4 months (I accidentally turned off the power button while
> it was playing a disc and it caused the problem).
What happens when there is a power failure?
|
961.6 | maybe a coincidence, but not likely | SALEM::MGINGRAS | Roll Over, Chuck Berry! | Wed Nov 18 1987 09:58 | 24 |
| regarding last two notes:
power off does not mean send the unit back for repair. Mistracking
does. I equate sudden loss of power while the unit was playing
to the mistracking problem because the mistracking started to occur
the very next time I played a disc.
I haven't made that mistake again (and I'm not curious enough to
take the chance) and I haven't had a power outage while playing
discs since I got the player back. Whether it would create the
same problem, I don't know.
I like the fact that they player is reliable, but I'm secretly hoping
it doesn't last tooooo long. I'd like my next player to have a
feature that repeats segments of a disc in a loop so I can learn
guitar and keyboard licks.
I wonder if turning the power off while playing a disc could cause
a possible mechanical problem in any player. By the way, the problem
only occurred after about the 40 minute mark on any disc, the further
the laser got from the center.
Marty
|
961.7 | diden't hurt mine.... | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Wed Nov 18 1987 22:14 | 6 |
| I have powered mine off while playing a disk more than once and
havent had any mis-tracking/skipping/ect. This happened when I had
the unit plugged into a switched outlet. I also powered down with
the unit switch (during user training) with no resulting problems.
-j
|
961.8 | programming a 950 is a lot easier than a 302! | HAZEL::BELKIN | WHAAAAAAAATTTT????? | Fri Dec 16 1988 09:12 | 27 |
|
Cuomo's (Salem, N.H.) has the Sony CDP-750 on sale for $280.
I think the salesman said they had one or 2 left as of last night.
They also have the CPD-950 on sale for $350. They had 4 left, but
only 3 after I was there.. :-). Cuomos also has a bunch of other
Sony (and other brands) CD players on sale, until Christmas. You have
until Jan. 23 or so to return a unit (instead of the usual 7 days).
I experimented a bit with the 750 and 950, and found the 950 to have
quicker track access. It also has a larger (by about 50%, at least)
display of disk time, track etc, (good for my nearsighted eyes),
variable (remote controlled) line and headphone output, and of course
all that Disk Memo programming jazz..
I didn't think the disk memo would be that useful, but if you leave
a disk in the player at power-off, and when you power it on you don't
remember which CD is in the drawer, it shows your label. (my memory
isn't that bad!). You can also use it to leave messages (in 10 letter
phrases) for your friends :-).
The 950 is replacing my CDP-302, which is becoming a gift (for a small
compensation to help me with my 950!) for my brother. All the buttons
on the 950's remote work the 302, and vice versa, except for features
the player's don't share.
Josh
|
961.9 | Sony questions | NAC::ROBINS | question reality | Tue Dec 27 1988 11:58 | 7 |
| Is the 750 being replaced with a 770 (as the 350 was replaced by
370 and the 550 by the 570)? If so, has anyone seen one? Where,
and what are your impressions?
How 'bout the 950/970?
ScottR, just sold some stock :-)
|
961.10 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Tue Dec 27 1988 21:58 | 7 |
| I haven't seen any models in the x70 line higher than the 570, but
that doesn't mean they don't exist. I notice that Sony seems to
be bringing the ES line closer to the standard line, so that at the
point you are considering a "970", you may want to look at a
507ESD.
Steve
|
961.11 | CD TIME readout funny!! | HAZEL::BELKIN | WHAAAAAAAATTTT????? | Wed Dec 28 1988 09:31 | 44 |
|
Don't know anything about -.1, -.2.
Have a question about the "total disk time" and ""disk remaining time"
displays/readout, of Sony/Philips players.
My Sony 950, and a friend's 750, both read 2 seconds more than the true
time (according to the jewel box) of a CD, when first loaded into the
player. then, when entering "pause" mode so that the player
is cued up (pauesed) at the first track, and hit the "TIME"
button so you get the "total time remaining" display, get the true
indicated time (whats on the jewel box).
My friend (who reads Digital Audio regularly) remembered reading an
article somewhere (DA?) that its just a pecularity of Sony/Philips
players to do this. Anyone have any more info? what about other brands?
How about the Sony portables?
I've tried calling the Sony hotline (1-800-222-SONY) but of course its
always busy (with people asking about this extra 2 seconds problem, I'd
expect :-). Isn't there another Sony number that gets through? (I've
read most of the Sony-keyworded notes in this file, can't remember
seeing it).
Of course this is a pretty small nit to pick, but being engineer I just
kinda wonder about this. Ya'd think they could at least program the
uP to subtract 2 seconds, or sup'tin :-). BTW, how is the total
disk time determined, anyway? Is there a header at the start of the CD,
and the player keep a count-down from there?
Another very small nit to pick on my 950 (I'd never use this mode
anyway, but I still wonder about it) is the Play Mode function when
using Custom Indexes. Does not seem to work! Manual says you can
toggle play mode from Continous to Single and back by repeated pressing
of the Custom Index button, once you've entered C.I. mode (and of course
you've prgrammed a C.I.). But, when display says I'm in Single play
mode, player does not finish the track being played and stop, it
Continues. Maybe it needs two Custom indexes to define a track, and
I've tried this with just one C.I. so it just plays on... gotta try
this out...
Josh
|
961.12 | not just Sony & Philips | STAR::BIGELOW | Bruce Bigelow, DECnet-VAX | Wed Dec 28 1988 11:25 | 5 |
| The 2 second difference is not a peculiarity of only Sony and Philips.
I have seen this on at least 3 other manufacturers' players. The
only one I specifically remember is an Emerson player.
B
|
961.13 | Sony and Phillips Cover the Market | USRCV1::THOMPSONP | Paul Thompson, Rochester, NY | Wed Dec 28 1988 15:05 | 4 |
| I don't know about the microprocessors, but I believe that you will
find that, at their heart, ALL CD players are either Sony or Phillips
technology. Along with Denon, they invented it.
|
961.14 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Wed Dec 28 1988 16:59 | 14 |
| Re: .13
Sorry, not true. First of all, Denon was not involved in the creation
of the CD standard of today - they had a proposal in, but it was
rejected. Secondly, while Sony and Philips drives and electronics
cover a large segment of the market, they by no means control ALL
of it. Yamaha, Toshiba and other Japanese firms have their own
controller chips.
I have seen differences of much more than two seconds between the
listed and displayed times on my CDP-510. As much as 30 seconds
in one case. I don't let it worry me.
Steve
|
961.15 | gotta be a reason | HAZEL::BELKIN | WHAAAAAAAATTTT????? | Thu Dec 29 1988 07:35 | 16 |
| re < Note 961.14 by QUARK::LIONEL "Ad Astra" >
> I have seen differences of much more than two seconds between the
> listed and displayed times on my CDP-510. As much as 30 seconds
> in one case. I don't let it worry me.
Aha! Yes, I've seen that too - I think its errors/inaccuracy in
the packaging dept. I'm talking about differences that are seen
from operating the CD player in two different modes (1. Loading a
disk, 2. Cuing a disk to the beginning and displaying Remaining Time).
try again, Steve ! :-)
Still, anyone have the technical scoop?
with piqued interest, Josh
|
961.16 | Possible reason for difference in times | ATSE::DMILLER | Cecil B D'MilleR, the Esoteric | Thu Dec 29 1988 09:31 | 10 |
| Here's a thought...
Did you ever notice that some tracks have a lead-in time? This may
show up as negative time before a track starts, or just a countdown.
With the player in pause mode at the beginning of track one, try a
backward search. I bet you can go back 2 seconds before track one
begins.
-Dave
|
961.17 | hey, whats 2 seconds between uP's, eh? :-) | HAZEL::BELKIN | WHAAAAAAAATTTT????? | Thu Dec 29 1988 11:32 | 14 |
| re < Note 961.16 by ATSE::DMILLER "Cecil B D'MilleR, the Esoteric" >
> With the player in pause mode at the beginning of track one, try a
> backward search. I bet you can go back 2 seconds before track one
sounds plausible - I'll try it*. I was thinking it could be something
along these lines but couldn't quite grasp it. But, then since most
disk total times as printed (at least for classical CDs where more
care seems to be taken) do agree with the "paused" time, any lead-in
time is not counted?
Josh
*probably the only time I'll use the "slow-search" function on the remote ! :-)
|
961.18 | A Non-Problem or An Odd Bug? | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Thu Dec 29 1988 12:03 | 12 |
|
Sounds like two problems here. I wouldn't worry if the time listed
on the cover doesn't match what the player says.....I've seen listings
on LPs that were incorrect by *minutes*.
On the other hand, if "time remaining" at the top of track one doesn't
equal "total time" read out when inserting the disk, now *that*
is strange. I never bothered to check this out on my 750.
Hmmmm....
|
961.19 | Lead-in time | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Thu Dec 29 1988 19:00 | 14 |
| There is indeed often 2-4 seconds of "negative time" before track 1
(and often other tracks) on most discs. It would not surprise me in
the least to find that cueing to track 1 skips this lead-in time that
is counted in with the total disc time.
Ok, I just tried this with my CDP-510. Using the disc "A Christmas
Festival with Arthur Fiedler and the Boston Pops" (RCA 6428-2-RG),
a wonderful disc by the way, the total disc time reads as 64:10 whereas
the time remaining when I cue to track 1 is 64:08. I can't step
backwards from that point, but I would bet money that there is two
seconds of lead-in that the player is skipping over. But why should
I complain - the cover says 63:59!
Steve
|