[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference cookie::notes$archive:cd_v1

Title:Welcome to the CD Notes Conference
Notice:Welcome to COOKIE
Moderator:COOKIE::ROLLOW
Created:Mon Feb 17 1986
Last Modified:Fri Mar 03 1989
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1517
Total number of notes:13349

888.0. "Digital Thunder Anyone?" by SURPLS::WAXMAN () Mon Aug 31 1987 14:10

    Telarc has released a disk with Groffe's Grand Canyon Suite that
    contains Digital Thunder. The disk carries a strong warning against
    playing it with loud volume; it may damage your system. The disk
    also contains gershwin's Catfish Row, a symphonic suite based on
    Progy and Bess. All in all, a worthwhile addition to your CD
    collection.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
888.11812...JAWS::COTEPractice Safe SysexMon Aug 31 1987 16:423
    How does it compare to Telarc's digital cannons?
    
    Edd
888.2SURPLS::WAXMANMon Aug 31 1987 16:527
    I cannot say since I have not heard the digital cannons. The digital
    thinder occurs during a 7'36" piece of music called cloudburst.
    It is a musical picture of a Thunderstorm in the Grand Canyon. There
    are two versions on the disk. The normal one played via the orchestra
    and the one with Digital Thunder and wind machine added for effects.
    Telarc claims that the captupe of the right thunder was a 5 year
    project.
888.3Move Over, AudiofidelityAQUA::ROSTYou used me for an ashtray heartMon Aug 31 1987 17:488
    
    What's next for Telarc?
    
    A 25-year project to record a digital thermonuclear blast???
    
    :-)     :-)      :-)      :-)
    
    
888.4That's thunder?COOKIE::ROLLOWIt's OK to say the U... wordMon Aug 31 1987 19:017
    I wasn't at all impressed by the thunder.  It lacked the depth
    and punch that I'm used to from a good proper thunderstorm (I'm
    from Oklahoma...).  The recording is otherwise pretty good.  I
    think they have two versions of the Cloudburst movement on the
    disk, one with stage thunder and the other with live thunder.  The
    default is stage thunder, but with a programmable player you
    can use the live thunder version.
888.5Speaker makers must love "Digital" effects....BETHE::LICEA_KANEMon Aug 31 1987 20:524
    
    Why?
    
    								-mr. bill
888.6QUARK::LIONELWe all live in a yellow subroutineMon Aug 31 1987 21:365
    Re: .5
    
    Because they do such a good business in replacement drivers, that's
    why!
    			Steve
888.7It Sells....PARITY::GOSSELINTue Sep 01 1987 14:3927
    I believe Telarc utilizes digitally recorded sound effects for several
    reasons:
    
    1) They sell discs - consumers find it nearly irresistable to 
       purchase a disc with these effects.
    
    2) Sonic realism - you can't get much more perfect than a digital
       recording of a cannon/thunderstorm....full dynamic range, 
       uncompressed.
    
    3) Equipment Appeal - Those audiophiles with megabuck systems can
       appreciate/demonstrate the full power of these recordings. As
       I recall, the cannons start at 200 hz, and roll off to 6 hz.
       Now, I (or anyone in my circle of friends) can't reproduce that,
       but I'm sure some folks have the capability. Some will even
       purchase the disc to test their systems - and take out drivers,
       fuses, eardrums......
    
     If it didn't sell, Telarc wouldn't be in the business. Suffice
    to say that there is enough demand for digitally recorded sound
    effects - be it cannons, thunderstorms, or whale sounds - that the
    inclusion of such in recorded music (1812 Overture) or as a special
    effects disc makes it appealing. 
    
    
                                      Ken
    
888.8Catfish RowKYOA::MIANOJohn M. Miano - NJOThu Sep 03 1987 11:1112
    I hear Telarc is negociating with the Time Lords of Galifree to use a TARDIS
    to record the Big-Bang.
    
    On the serious side:
    
    The Gershwin Catfish Row ( and Rhapsody on Blue ) is also performed
    in by the Berlin Philharmonic with Ozawa conducting.  Both works
    are well done.  Anyone who is familiar with this suite that Gershwin
    himself did of Porgy and Bess will not tollerate the bastardized
    "A Symphonic Portrait" version by Robert Russell Bennett.
                             
    -John