T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
568.1 | | BPOV09::DANEK | | Fri Dec 12 1986 16:48 | 11 |
| I don't remember the model number but I read that some new Magnavox is now
using 16 bits in the DAC and that they're also using some signal shaping
circuitry to give you 18 bit performance. This is all based on what they did
before when they only used 14 bits plus wave shaping to get 16 bit
performance.
Another new feature was the memory they're using that remembers the playback
sequence of some 200 discs...so the next time you play that disc you don't
need to re-key the sequence.
Dick
|
568.2 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Fri Dec 12 1986 17:06 | 4 |
| The model is CDB-650. It has been reviewed in Digital Audio, and
there's some comments on it in this conference. It's not clear that
Magnavox's construction quality has improved any.
Steve
|
568.3 | the cheper players may be better! | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | There is no 'N' in TURNKEY | Mon Dec 15 1986 17:20 | 24 |
| I've been offered the CDB-650 for $350 in a local mid-fi salon. I
haven't checked elsewhere, but the lower units are even less
expensive, and will likely drop further in the comming months.
Most of the high end 2041 based players will likely be moving to
the new 16 bit players soon. I know that the CAL Tempest (tube
analogue) will have a new player at the winter CES.
When I was in St Louis two weeks ago, I visited John Hillig of
Musical Concepts. He had both the -650 and the -4x0 with his mods
installed in them. I didn't get a chance to listen to both, and
wasn-t at all familiar with his system, so I can't say how the
-650 I heard stacks up to other players. When I asked him about
differences between the two players, he said that they were
features only, but he thought that the lower end -4x0 sounded a
bit better than the -650. he thought that all of the extra
features, processors, etc. might in some way "distract" the power
supply, or create extra noise in the system.
If the 4x0 and 650 are sonic improvements over the 2041, then I
haven't heard the Japanese CD player (save the Phillips based
Kyocera / Nakamichi) that will even come close to them in sound
quality. I may have a chance to compare the (stock) 2041 to one of
these on a very high end system soon. If I do, I'll let you know
how they stack up.
|
568.4 | Are 16 bits audibly better than 14? | RAYNA::BILLMERS | Meyer Billmers, AI Applications | Wed Dec 17 1986 21:21 | 6 |
| As an owner of the 1051 (a happy one), I still can't see spending $400 if
the construction quality hasn't improved. At $200 a CD player is almost
disposable, but not at $400.
Anyway, can one really hear the extra two bits? Has anyone out there done
A/B testing on 14(shaped to 16) vs 16(shaped to 18)bit players?
|
568.5 | Where do the extra 2 bits come from? | STAR::JACOBI | Paul Jacobi - VAX/VMS Development | Fri Dec 19 1986 08:54 | 8 |
| How does this player get 18 bit resolution from 16 bits? Is there
some type of mathematical approximation? What is the maximum error?
Can you tell the difference?
-Paul
|
568.6 | 14 vs 16 bit comparison | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | There is no 'N' in TURNKEY | Fri Dec 19 1986 13:41 | 25 |
| Re: .4
We just picked up our 2041 last night. While we were there, we
took the oportunity to compare it to the new 16 bit players. I
didn't check which model we were listening to, but I think it was
the top end -650. The rest of the system was British (Musical)
Fidelity electronics, and Acoustat speakers. We had less than an
hour to listen to this system, and I could not hear any
differences. I don't think my wife really heard any differences
either.
If there are any improvements (or losses), they are very small,
and I wouldn't suggest someone rush out and replace their 2041
with a new 16 bit player. Now if you don't have a good player, the
new 16 bit units might be worth considering, depending on the
price.
I don't know what the new players are being discounted to; the low
end 360 and 460 both list for the same $279 as the 2041. I paid
$130 for the 2041, and should get a $15 rebate. The 560 adds
remote and the price goes to around $330, and the top 650 has FTS
and lists for $429. For now, we will live with the 2041, and may
make a mod or two.
RIP (that's Pieces) D-5 :-(
|
568.7 | Hope your luck improves | DTP::DPARKER | Dave Parker - NCO SWS | Sun Dec 21 1986 14:19 | 16 |
| Well, Bob, I hope you have better luck with your 2041 than
I've had with mine. The fool thing won't track a number of
disks that the D5 plays just fine. The number of disks having
the problem is slowly escalating, too. Only thing that they
all have in common is that all the problem disks were manufactured
in Japan.
I am sufficiently disgusted with the mechanical construction
of the Magnavox to never buy another one. I also have some
doubts about it's ability to do error correction. Too bad,
too, since all the 'high-end' players I've been thinking about
are Magnavox based.
Oh well, back to the drawing board.
Dave
|
568.8 | Musical Concepts CD-1 | ARCTIC::DODGE | | Sun Dec 21 1986 21:51 | 27 |
|
My first endeavor into the wonderful world of CD players was with
a recent order of a Musical Concepts CD-1 based upon the Maggi CDB-650
This was somewhat of a spontaneous decision as I was unable to demo
it. However, Musical Concepts has a good reputation and their prior
mods have been to their credit. i.e. cd mods, hafler, etc.. Locally,
(burlington, Vt.) all that was availible of hi-fidelity was the
PS Audio, NAD and Nakamichi series. Dealer wasn't really even demoing
PS's machine (which was surprising with the Stereophile rave reviews
and the way the dealer pushes PS equipment), the NAD was ok and
the Nak was nice but way overpriced for given performance.
I did finally find the name of a dealer who sold some of the Maggi
products in VT however, when contacted, he had just hear of CD players!
and bringing up a particular model number, etc threw him into a
tizzie; he's gone back to selling TV's....
Anyhow, I expect the CD-1 early January, will let folks know of
the results. Once my ears become "tuned" to it I plan on doing
another level of modification. Something on par with Musical Concepts
LIPS II (low-internal-power-supply) and their outboard OPS-4B power
supply. I'm planning on building my own but I need to talk to Musical
Concepts about this as I'm concerned about warranty ramifications..
Updates later...
Tom
|
568.9 | | THORBY::MARRA | John 3:3 is right. | Mon Dec 22 1986 08:28 | 4 |
|
Where did you get a 2041 for 130$?
.dave.
|
568.10 | Rebate on all Magnavox 11/22 - 12/28 | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | There is no 'N' in TURNKEY | Mon Dec 22 1986 18:23 | 30 |
| McDade here in Chicago (I don't know if they are in the Boston
area, but they are equivalent to Service Merchandise) has them on
sale for $139.95 - $15 rebate from Magnavox. What I actually
bought was a "renewed" unit for $129.95 - $15. Magnavox
manufacturers its CD players in Belgium, and actually opens them
up and q/c checks them before sending them on to their dealers.
Ones with minor defects are fixed and sold for less. maybe that is
what some of the bargain outlets sell without telling the
customer, as there is really no way to tell anything was ever done
to the unit.
BTW, the rebate is good on most Magnavox CD players bought between
November 22 and December 28. Models are the 1041, 1051, 2041, and
the new 460, 560, and 650. You need your dated sales receipt, the
"warranty registration" card, and the form itself. I called the
local Magnavox office to get the form.
Dave, is your problem a "scraping" sound on the thicker disks.
Another 2041 player I borrowed had a similar problem. It didn't
like any of the thicker (better) disks that had played fine on my
late D-5. Problems were on disks like Reference recordings,
Sheffield, Telarc, etc.; poor disks like DG all played fine. One
Magnavox dealer told me this was a common problem with the old
transports; straight out of the box. I think it might come from
being bounced around too much in shipment. The plastic chassis
doesn't help; lifting one corner of the player makes it worse.
Supposedly this has been fixed on the new models. If yours is
still under warranty (1 year I think), then by all means let
Magnavox fix it for you. Given their current prices, I wouldn't
bother with an out-of-warranty repair.
|
568.11 | cheap! | NATASH::WEIGL | Turboferrets - racing for answers | Mon Dec 29 1986 14:40 | 4 |
|
I saw an ad in the San Francisco Chronicle for Maggie 1051's for
$85, after the rebate. Not bad, eh? Can't remember the store,
but it was in Saturday's paper....
|
568.12 | Too late for rebate now... | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | There is no 'N' in TURNKEY | Tue Dec 30 1986 15:52 | 1 |
| You had to buy your Maggie by last Sunday to get the rebate!
|