T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
523.1 | My $.02 | HANDEL::DEROSA | Well... here we are. | Fri Nov 07 1986 12:39 | 26 |
| I decided against remote control when I bought my Denon unit. I had
only so much money to make a purchase, and I decided that the #1
"feature" was sonic quality. At the risk of stating the obvious (I
always say this right before I state the obvious), remote controls and
fancy florescent displays don't add one nit to the sound you are
hearing. I guessimated that remote control adds $50 to the cost of a
player, and I wanted that $50 to give me better sound instead.
Of course, convenience (and the lack of it) has a "price" as well. My
decision was that when I want to play music, I want to play it. I
didn't see myself fiddling with the music from my sofa. Although I love
RC on my VCR, I felt that music was a different ball of wax. I am now
sure that I made the right decision (for me).
If I tell you how much I enjoy my Denon, others will tell you the same
thing about their decks. The net result will be: So what? Listen to
all three decks in a sound room, through identical components closely
approximating the ones you have at home. Real Purists would advise you
to lug your equipment into the showroom, or even audition the units at
home in their final sonic environment. Forget it --- just listening to
them in neutral tests at your favorite audio store is good enough. If
you feel rushed or don't feel that you are being given the time to
carefully listen to each unit, walk out.
jdr
|
523.2 | How much better can it get? | IRT::VECRUMBA | | Fri Nov 07 1986 16:58 | 10 |
| Another question: I've gotten several comments from people that
it's not worth buying a real good quality (bucks-wise) CD, i.e.,
get a Magnavox cheepie, since the technology is still changing
rapidly. I've read notes that 1) talk about the (good) sound out
of the Magnavox, but also ones about 2) "I took 5 home and none
of them tracked my disks". My own feeling is to go for a solid
CD now and not worry about the technical advances -- after all,
at a certain point, how much better can/will a CD sound? Isn't a
CD already limited by the quality of the other components in the
system?
|
523.3 | How much better cn it get? How much you got! | NEXUS::FURLONG | | Fri Nov 07 1986 17:10 | 15 |
| I have an addition to 523.2. I recently had an audiophile experience
where I was shown (for hours) the difference between high end
turntables. It can get much better than what I have, but at what
price. A recent article in Stereo Review or other such publication
said that most CD players have the same specs, but if you find one
that sounds good to you buy it. It is important to keep the
constraints of your system in mind. The final sound will only be
as good as your weakest component, but it is important to start
with something that will produce what was recorded and then amplify
that.
I have a remote control with my Sony CD55 and find it not quite
useless but certainly non-essential. So if you have to decide between
a unit with remote control and one that sounds better or is cheaper,
don't let the remote control win.
|
523.4 | Took the plunge, headfirst lunge... | IRT::VECRUMBA | | Mon Nov 10 1986 15:35 | 8 |
| Took the plunge on the Denon: seemed the most solidly built and
also had the most neutral sound in the upper range (insofar as
one can tell with CD's)
Thanks for your help. (I now resume with putting together the rest
of my system - see AUDIO note 644...)
Peters
|