[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference cookie::notes$archive:cd_v1

Title:Welcome to the CD Notes Conference
Notice:Welcome to COOKIE
Moderator:COOKIE::ROLLOW
Created:Mon Feb 17 1986
Last Modified:Fri Mar 03 1989
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1517
Total number of notes:13349

470.0. "DDD by major ROCK stars?" by VENTUR::JAIN () Thu Sep 25 1986 11:20

    		<DDD-BY MAJOR ROCK STARS>
    
    I want to know if there are any CDs out there that are DDD.
    All the CDs I have seem to be originally recorded on ANALOG
    equipment and then DIGITALLY remastered for CDs.
    
    
    p.s.  LED ZEPPELIN's ZOSO CD - The song STAIRWAY TO HEAVEN
    seems to have an excessive amount of background noise.  
    Could this not have been filtered out digitally?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
470.1If the master has problems...BOVES::WALLI see the middle kingdom...Thu Sep 25 1986 13:2110
    
    Note 238 is devoted to this topic.
    
    The ZOSO CD is subject to the old "limitations of the source tape"
    hassle.  I'm not familiar enough with the technology to comment
    whether or not anything could have been done about it.  My roommate
    has this disk, and his complaint about it is the guitar and drums
    breaking up in "When the Levee Breaks".
    
    Dave W.
470.2VENTUR::JAINWed Oct 01 1986 12:1014
    re .1  Thanks for the pointer on note 238.
    
    	I picked up the Frankie Goes To Hollywood "Welcome To The
    Pleasuredome' CD.  The sound is truly incredible.  I had guessed
    the disc was DDD even before I read about it.  
    
    	Talking to some of my Audiophile friends I learned that the
    reason many of the CDs are not DDD is because many of the recording
    studios just are geared for digital recording.  If this is the case
    why have they not switched?  Can't they see the CD revolution taking
    place?
    	
    	Personally the extended dynamic range of the DDD disc is worth
    the price tag.
470.3QUARK::LIONELReality is frequently inaccurateWed Oct 01 1986 13:515
    Re .2:
        The rock studios haven't switched because throwing out ALL of
    their equipment (recorders, mixing boards, etc.) is EXPENSIVE! 
    But there are some all-digital studios out there.
    				Steve
470.4EconomicsRADON::WEAVERLDP - Laboratory Data ProductsWed Oct 01 1986 20:2222
    re: .2
    
    While digital is certainly a good medium, just like analog there
    can be poorly built units and great units.  Why should a studio
    toss out all there analog gear just to get another "D" on the label?
    They should toss it if it is inferior equipment.  If it is superior
    equipment, then they will probably phase in superior digital equipment
    over time and sell off or junk the analog when the maintenance becomes
    expensive.  The main advantage to going digital is that their master
    tapes will last longer, and they won't lose as much S/N when mixing.
    
    If someone wants to give them some good digital equipment I am sure
    that they would be more than happy to accept it.  It is a simple
    fact of economics.  Some may be waiting for the next generation
    of equipment.  There are a whole host of reasons that seem to obvious
    to even bother to mention.
    
    "Dark Side of the Moon" was recorded on analog equipment and sounds
    great!  It was also recorded in early 70's (late 60's?) on superior
    equipment.
    
    							-Dave