T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
303.1 | Get the -IV, not the -CD | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | Bob Kaplow DDO | Sat Mar 08 1986 16:49 | 17 |
| They may help some of the older players. On any of the better players,
forget the -CD, and get the regular Interlink. Isn't the -II the old
stuff, now replaced by the -IV? I've got their latest catalog, and
don't see the -II referenced anywhere.
The reviews I've seen don't think much of the -Special either. It isn't
enough of an improvement over the -IV to justify the price increase.
That leaves a choice between the -IV at $25/meter or the -Reference at
$80/meter. Let your ears decide. I doubt that many systems are good
enough to justify the -Reference, although I did go for one of these
between my preamp and amp.
There are a lot of other products besides Monster to choose from. There
are some that are better, but more expensive. There is a lot of trash
too! For the $25, it is a fair deal, and will work in most any system.
A little Cramolin or Tweek, and you are all set. Go back to AUDIO.NOTE
for the full rundown on cables and Cramolin/Tweek.
|
303.2 | CD ad is insulting hype | MILES::KAEPPLEIN | | Sat Mar 08 1986 19:56 | 27 |
| The ad copy is so full of crap so as to make Linn look rational.
What they are selling is a pretty decent interconnect whose high
frequencies are rolled off. This is a great blessing on many early
CD players, but you can get some of that from the Interlink IV since
all Monster wires tend towards a smoother and more listenable sound.
I'd agree with Bob that I wouldn't bother spending more than $25
on a cable, unless I was using one of the very best players.
A good dealer will let you try out cables at home. Right now I'm
trying out speaker wires. I didn't like Straightwire Music Ribbon
24 and am now comparing Monster Powerline II with Straightwire Teflon
12. Wednesday I'm going to compare with FMS Green and FMS Grey.
Don't let anybody tell you that wire doesn't make a difference!
All those wires are far more detailed than my current plain Monster
Cable.
Most of the top wires will have a more coherrent soundstage, but
differ in frequency balance. If your system is too bright, a softer
cable will help, and if your system is too dull, a quicker/brighter
cable will liven it up. This is why you really have to insert the
cable in your system before knowing whether or not to buy it. If
you can't hear any difference, surely return it.
Mark
|
303.4 | WIRED | KRYPTN::JACOBS | | Sun Mar 09 1986 21:20 | 5 |
| re-1 OH NO! The voice of sanity...
pj
|
303.5 | I LIKE Interlink-CD | DTP::DPARKER | Dave Parker - NCO SWS | Sun Mar 09 1986 22:51 | 12 |
| re: .1
Aha, Bob! I think this may be why we differ on the sound of
the Sony D5. I use Interlink-CD on mine. I've tried it with
Interlink Reference, but unless the CD is really first rate,
the roll of the high end on the -CD cable sounds much smoother.
No doubt, for the best CD's, Reference is the calbe of choice.
But there are a lot of overly bright, screechy CDs out there,
and the Interlink CD does tame them nicely.
Dave
|
303.6 | I still vote for -IV for MOST systems | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | Bob Kaplow - DDO | Mon Mar 10 1986 18:47 | 21 |
|
re .3
You think wire doesn't make a difference? Come over to my house with 2
20' pairs of zip cord. I'm only using the cheaper Monster Powerline,
but there IS a difference on my system. After spending around $3000 in
6 months on upgrading the system, I'm not going to mask those
improvements to save $50 on wire.
Before we go flaming about this topic here, PLEASE go back to the
AUDIO.NOTE, and read the notes on wire. It DOES make a difference, IF
the wire is your weak link. I wouldn't spend the $50 on a $200 system,
thou. You would never hear the difference.
re .5
Dave, the D5 is one of the players that benefit from the -CD, but I
doubt that many low end CD player owners have the kind of system that
you do to run it into. They won't see the difference on their rack
systems that you do with your ARC. Even I wouldn't notice some things
on my system that you would on yours. Maybe someday I will.
|
303.8 | | GALLO::BANKS | Dawn Banks | Tue Mar 11 1986 12:58 | 1 |
| that quotation was Nilsson's (sp?) "The Point", rock man to Oblio.
|
303.9 | ...in the eyes of the beholder | GRAMPS::WCLARK | Walt Clark | Tue Mar 11 1986 13:54 | 4 |
| OK Reg....buy your stuff at K-Mart and Radio Shack. Just dont make
me buy the same stuff too....OK?
Walt
|
303.10 | Glad you're happy | AMBER::KAEPPLEIN | | Tue Mar 11 1986 14:24 | 1 |
| Buy their clothes and computers too.
|
303.11 | Attention K-Mart Shoppers... | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | Bob Kaplow - DDO | Tue Mar 11 1986 19:21 | 8 |
| ... and don't make ME listen to it.
I didn't mean "read AUDIO.NOTE because its always right", but "read
AUDIO.NOTE because there is no reason to copy all of those notes to
this file". I'm basicly lazy. I'm also a definite believer that one
should get what one pays for. For your blue light special, use the
cables that it comes with, and your 24 guage "speaker wire". I'll still
put good cable into my system. I can hear the difference.
|
303.12 | Only half of a smiley face. | SHOGUN::HEFFEL | Gary Heffelfinger | Tue Mar 11 1986 23:22 | 8 |
| Re: .10 My, my, aren't we eloquent.
Re: .11 Really. 24 gauge? Give us a break. There are plenty
of us who consider ourselves audiophiles but who do not feel the
need to connect bizzare speaker wires when 16 gauge zip cord has
served, and continues to serve the purpose.
Gary
|
303.13 | try it on a real system! | AMBER::KAEPPLEIN | | Thu Mar 13 1986 10:57 | 22 |
| I brought the set of Straightwire Teflon-12 speaker wires over to
Audio Vision last night and compared them with FMS green speaker
wire using VPI/Souther/Adcom front end, C-J Premier 3/Premier 4
and ProAc Studio I's.
Stereophile may think this is super stuff, but compared to the FMS
it was obviously inferior. Less detailed and kind of "sanitized"
where harmonics were just gone - no richness.
I noticed some of the same thing on my system comparing it with
Monster Cable Powerline II, but on that system it was blatently
obvious how washed out the Straightwire it.
I now have a new stereo store. They carry very nice stuff and their
salesmen are even human! I got to bring in my amp and speakers
and compare them on their best reference system to hear how they
do. Those $1000 Pro-Ac's demolished all kinds of other speakers.
While the best JSE had a more coherrent soundstage, nothing matched
the detail and dynamics of the little ProAcs except perhaps the
Proac ESB (had better bass, worse midrange, $3500).
|
303.14 | we used to compare components to straight wire... | GRAMPS::WCLARK | Walt Clark | Thu Mar 13 1986 14:05 | 29 |
| Re: .13
I had a similar experience which I related somewhere in AUDIO.note,
but in particular it was with interconnect (IE Preamp to Amp) cables.
I made up the cables my self, the only technical difference was
that one set used silver plated wire, the other had no plating.
I cannot say there was any "blown away" demos here but the silver
wires tended to have more transient detail and less harmonic richness
than the unplated. The choice of best would probably depend upon
the rest of the system and the listening room. In my last house,
the silver did it for me. In the current one (same equipment - just
a couple years older) the unplated seems more balanced.
I had done some speaker wire design experimenting about 3 years
ago. I was using Levinson HF-15 wire as the reference then and managed
to produce several configurations that did "blow away" the reference.
I settled on a cable made up of some 50 lengths per wire of 24 Ga
oxygen free copper computer backplane wire with silver plating and
teflon insulation (we had lots of this stuff in LCG field service
back when we didnt mind re-wiring the KI backplane in the field). When
terminated each conductor was about 1/4" in diameter. It is possible
that the same exact configuration with unplated wire might be preferred
in the new house as well. Maybe not. Anyway I have reason to believe
that the proper wire configuration for each installation would sound
dramatically better than zip cord - even really BIG ZIP CORD (like
the Levinson or Fulton).
Walt
|
303.15 | | TLE::WINALSKI | Paul S. Winalski | Fri Mar 14 1986 18:55 | 7 |
| RE: .13
Other readers of this file should keep in mind that Mr Kaepplein claims he
can hear differences made by capacitors, too. Complete discussion in
the AUDIO conference.
--PSW
|
303.16 | | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | Bob Kaplow - DDO | Sat Mar 15 1986 00:47 | 13 |
| re .15
Hear it! Hell! You can SEE it! (lemme just change a couple o' them
capacitors in that there monitor you're starin' at now...)
And when he invited another noter over to compare modified and
unmodified components, that person heard it too. Maybe if you are nice,
he would let YOU listen to the difference too!
re .13
Hey Mark, now you got your own store :-) Any discounts to DEC employees
:-) ^2 Where is it, I'll visit it next week during class (for real).
|
303.17 | Short Quick Facts! | NWD002::BROWNDA | | Sat Mar 15 1986 11:16 | 2 |
| Alright..... Lets have a list of the best cables based on the previous
research in the previous notes.
|
303.18 | Interconnect recommendations | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | Bob Kaplow - DDO | Sat Mar 15 1986 19:23 | 17 |
| There was no best list of cables, just a discussion of the merit
(or lack of) of cables affecting the sound.
For moderate (non high end) systems, the Monster Inerlink IV and
Straight Wire Flexconnect are decent interconnects at about $25 a pair.
Avoid the cheapies that come with most equipment, and Diskwasher
Gold-ens.
Reasonable priced speaker cable include Monster Powerline 2 and 3
($2.70 and $1.30 per foot), and Kimber 4PR ($1.00) and 4VS ($1.80). I
would stay away from lamp cord, and anything that uses clear insulation.
None of these are the 'best' cables, but reasonably priced, and
compatable with most systems. Those with real high end systems should
read the interconnect / cable reviews in the past year of TAS and
Stereophile. They should also look for a dealer willing to loan several
different cables for an extended audition at home.
|
303.19 | What gauge? | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Sun Mar 16 1986 22:59 | 15 |
| Do you know the gauge of those speaker wires, just offhand?
Even Stereo Review recommends keeping the resistance of your
speaker wires to under 0.2 ohms, which for 16 gauge would
mean about 25 feet (50 feet round trip). For a 50 foot run,
for example, that would mean using 12 gauge.
As one who has expressed some level of skepticism toward some
of the more "tweak" recommendations (such as the direction
of extrusion of interconnect wires), I'd be a lot less surprised
by an audible difference from changing capacitors (especially
those in the signal path) than from cables or connectors.
You change a component like that, you run the risk of changing
the frequency response of the unit you're modifying (although
I assume you're using precisely the same capacitance values).
|
303.20 | Clear insulation is bad? | TLE::CLARK | Ward Clark | Mon Mar 17 1986 18:44 | 6 |
| Bob -- In .18 you said that you "would stay away from ... anything
that uses clear insulation."
Does that include standard Monster Cable?
-- Ward
|
303.22 | Then how do you get that "transparent" sound? | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Tue Mar 18 1986 10:21 | 7 |
|
Suppose your cables are in the walls?
re .21
Eddie Currents? Wasn't he the one who sang "I left my heart
in Billerica"?
|
303.24 | digital ready interconnect? | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum | Sun Mar 23 1986 15:16 | 5 |
| In a few years I expect to see all digital tuner/CD/preamp/..
components with fiber optic interconnects. Think of all the new brand
names, Fantastic Fiber, Ultra-Glass II, ...
__Rich
|
303.25 | Speaker wire need not be large | LOUIE::KAEPPLEIN | | Sun Mar 23 1986 22:49 | 7 |
| RE: size of "exotic" cables.
Surprizingly, some of them are quite small, with all the conductors
added up they come to 12-16 guage. Others like the Powerline are
larger, and the now passe' Fulton was like welding cable.
There is more at work than DC resistance.
|
303.26 | | MILDEW::DEROSA | John DeRosa | Sat Mar 29 1986 05:13 | 3 |
| If there really is something to this super-duper interconnect/speaker
wire stuff, why don't manufacturers supply it with their components?
(i.e., the connection wires that come with your cassette, CD, tuner...)
|
303.27 | cables are part of the packaging | CSSE32::PHILPOTT | The Colonel - [WRU #338] | Sat Mar 29 1986 09:11 | 17 |
| It's not that long since manufacturers of quality Hi-Fi components
didn't supply any cabling (you bought or made your own).
As prices came down, and average disposable income went up, people
bega. to buy Hi-Fi who had not been in the market before. They demanded
ease of set up, and designs that looked attractive (as opposed to
merely sounding great). This led to "ranges" of "matching" equipment,
and of course to simple things like including a few ca"les in the
box to make it easier to hook up the stuff.
However the name of the game hasn't changed: the maker is selling
an amp, or a CD or whatever, not cables. The cables consequently
are usually the cheapest he can find (and are probably best thrown
away with the box the unit came in).
/. Ian .\
|
303.28 | There is no one best cable | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | Bob Kaplow - DDO | Sun Mar 30 1986 17:45 | 19 |
| [Sorry for the delay - I've been away fo 2 weeks...]
Re .20?
I've heard that the clear insulation both deteriorates from seposure
to sunlight, and causes the copper under it to deteriorate as well.
For an in-the-wall installation, I guess it wouldn't matter.
re others
The cheap equipment manufacturers tend to throw in a set of $2.00
cables as a 'convenience' to their customers. High end equipment
usually comes with some information on choosing cables, or at least
recommends that the buyer audition several. They also market their
equipment thru dealers that can help the buyer make such a decision. No
manufacturer can say that one specific cable is best with their
equipment 100% of the time, as 'best' varies with what is at the other
end of the cable, the rest of the system, and also with the taste of
the listener.
|
303.29 | | GRAMPS::WCLARK | Walt Clark | Mon Mar 31 1986 10:21 | 10 |
| As Bob says in .28, the better equipment doesnt want to presuppose
the buyers preferences (or lack thereof) for cables in much the
same way that high end turntable manufacturers do not try to force
the purchaser into an arm or cartridge by providing them. Since
cheap cables work and no cable doesnt, I think many manufacturers
will throw something into the box just to keep folks who hadnt thought
thru the cables ahead of time from coming back pissed because the unit
could not be hooked up.
Walt
|
303.30 | Clear insulation... | MUNICH::ORA | This space intentionally left nonblank | Wed Apr 02 1986 05:46 | 7 |
| re .18, .22 clear insulation: To me, the reason is obvious: the
electrons traveling on the surface of the wire are able to see the
ugly world and they try to return to the amplifier, thus causing
severe distortion.
I recommend black plastic hose filled with mercury.
|
303.31 | | THORBY::MARRA | All I have to be is what You made me. | Wed Apr 02 1986 08:38 | 8 |
|
the black plastic filled with mercury is a great idea! to turn
the volume down all you have to do is squeeze the wire - to turn
it off, just bend it, like a garden hose.
Where do I get mine???
.dave.
|
303.32 | | AMBER::KAEPPLEIN | | Wed Apr 02 1986 12:26 | 2 |
| A good compromise between solid-state (transistor) and gas (tubes)
devices to get that liquid sound!
|
303.33 | titleless reply | THORBY::MARRA | All I have to be is what You made me. | Wed Apr 02 1986 15:10 | 6 |
|
Of couse, when it's cold the mercury will shrink, therefore not
making the correct connection, and when hot will explode outof the
tubing. Specially designed temperature systems must be designed
such as a constant temperature cabinet with battery backup so that
when the power goes, it won't overheat and explode.
|
303.34 | | AMBER::KAEPPLEIN | | Wed Apr 02 1986 15:50 | 2 |
| Tubes warming up the room would then explain expanded soundstage
effects.
|
303.35 | Aren't these all a day late??? | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | Bob Kaplow - DDO | Wed Apr 02 1986 20:52 | 0
|