T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
249.1 | | GRAFIX::DAVISON | | Thu Jan 09 1986 19:24 | 16 |
| Cassettes can come very close to the performance of a CD player.
... but the "Garbage-In-Garbage-Out" rule still applies so it really
is important to record the cassettes directly from compact discs
recordings. Good quality tape cassettes and a good cassette deck
are also important.
You don't get the other advantages of a CD, but I'm not going to
go into that because that doesn't seem to apply to your question.
As for sound quality, try it yourself. Make a recording from a
CD on a good tape, then have someone else switch back and forth
from tape to CD and see if you can tell the difference. I was
given this demonstration in a listening room, and I couldn't tell.
It was my CD too.
Glenn
|
249.3 | | AKOV75::BOYAJIAN | | Fri Jan 10 1986 05:18 | 19 |
| I think that .0 was referring to pre-recorded cassettes, though I could be
wrong. (What? Me? Wrong? :-))
Pre-recorded cassettes are getting better all the time. Mostly, I think the
impetus for this is to get people to buy the cassette rather make a better
copy from someone's LP.
As a previous response said, it's still a matter of GIGO. If the recording
company puts care into making the cassettes, they'll come out good; if not,
they won't. The tapes put out today using HX-Pro, XDR, or whatever alphabet
soup you can insert here are *extremely* clean and sound *extremely* good.
I've been buying them over the last year for two reasons: (1) because I
haven't owned a turntable for a couple of years and don't now have access
to one, and (2) because most of my music listening is done in the car. I
have been very pleased with the tapes being produced today.
But compared to CD's? No, the tapes aren't quite up to CD's.
--- jerry
|
249.4 | | EUCLID::PAULHUS | | Fri Jan 10 1986 12:51 | 5 |
| For automobile listening, tapes made from CDs are completely adequate
(assuming good recorder, etc). Since a quiet car environment is over
60 dBA, the difference in signal-to-noise and hiss get lost in the background
noise. You might want to compress the tape a bit to hear quiet passages!
Chris
|
249.5 | | CADCAM::MAHLER | | Fri Jan 17 1986 13:55 | 6 |
| When I record with my Nak 300Bx and switch between
tape and source, I am hard pressed to tell the difference.
The tape does have the hiss though.
Mike "Who like cd because you can play them again and again ..."
|
249.6 | Taping a CD: Problems! | DELNI::TRUSLOW | | Thu Aug 13 1987 13:22 | 32 |
| I'm so far behind in catching up with these notes that I doubt anyone
will ever read this--but here goes anyway:
I have a Nakamichi "Dragon" cassette deck, and a few days ago I
tried to record a CD on it. (I'd done this before using a Maxell
Gold tape and had no trouble.) The tape I was using was a Nakamichi
metal tape, even though there is a warning, buried away in the guts
of the Nakamichi "Dragon" instruction manual, not to use metal tape
in the deck. It doesn't say why--just warns you not to. The same
people who sold me the "Dragon" (Goodwin's Music Systems in Cambridge)
also sold me the Nakamichi metal tapes--although it was months after
I bought the deck. At any rate, I've used those metal tapes on a
number of occasions to record LPs and never had any trouble doing
that either.
But last week, trying to record the CD, the deck would come to a
stop at random points during the recording. I made about six efforts
to record the thing. Sometimes the deck would stop 15 minutes into
the side, sometimes it would stop 5 minutes in, and once it managed
almost 30 minutes before stopping. The CD is a fairly recent issue
on the London label. I'm wondering now if it has been recorded with
the record-foil missing frequency wedge and if something in my tape
deck is responding to that (even though it's not a digital recorder
and is over a year old). Or is it a result of using a forbidden
metal tape? Or has somethin' busted in the tape deck?
Any suggestions about this that might spare me having to take the
deck in for repairs (particularly if the problem is really not in
the deck at all!) would be MOST APPRECIATED!
Jack Truslow
|
249.7 | Try a different tape...but I'll bet its the deck | DSSDEV::STRANGE | Being for the benefit of Mr. Kite | Thu Aug 13 1987 13:48 | 16 |
| First of all, I am surprised to hear that the Dragon is not supposed
to use metal tape. This sounds rediculous, since the Dragon is
supposedly the best deck on the market, and metal tape should give
the best results of any tape formula. Anyway, I don't really see
how the tape formulation can have an effect on the tape's motion
through the deck. Have you tried recording using some other types
of tape? I'm quite sure that it has nothing to do with copyguard,
as this has not yet been implemented on any equipment or CDs (to
my knowledge, anyway). My suggestion would be to try different
tape (although I would expect the same thing to happen, unless the
metal tape you're using is mechanically-defective).
If anyone else knows anything about this warning about metal tapes,
I'd be interested in any info, as I don't understand this at all
(especially from Nak).
Steve
|
249.8 | Quiet passages? | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Thu Aug 13 1987 14:44 | 21 |
| > I'm so far behind in catching up with these notes that I doubt anyone
> will ever read this--but here goes anyway:
No problem - are you aware of the "next unseen" aspects of Notes?
I have a Dragon, and have recorded many CDs (for use in car or work
or for rearranging selections) with no difficulty. Did you have
the auto-record-pause mode set, and were there lengthy pauses
in the program material perhaps? I have seen the auto-record-pause
trigger when the program material got very quiet for an extended
period (over 30 seconds) - a lengthy pianissimo, for example
- I think it triggers if the signal is below -15dB for 30-45
seconds.
I have used metal tape with excellent results. I don't recall
the warning - but I suspect they're not talking about metal
formulation tape but rather tapes with metal strips intended
to trigger auto-reverse mechanisms. (They used to make them in
reel-to-reels - weren't there some cassettes made the same way?)
After all - the Dragon has a specific bias adjustment for metal
bias tapes - why include it if you can't use it?
|
249.9 | Taping CDs--Problems | DELNI::TRUSLOW | | Mon Aug 17 1987 13:43 | 42 |
| To answer a few questions from .7 and .8:
I've used a number of different brands of tape (I mentioned having
used a Maxell, and it was only a couple of weeks ago--worked fine
then), and I've even used the Nakamichi metal tape with no previous
problems (to record LPs, though, not CDs).
The first time that I had a problem was when I taped an LP of George
Szell conducting Beethoven's Sixth, followed by a CD of Arthur Fiedler
conducting the overture to "William Tell," and then a cut from the
CD of Michaelangeli playing Chopin. I used the timing information
from the booklets and had worked out the program so that it lasted
approximately 43 minutes. On the reverse side of the tape I recorded
nothing but CDs. I gave the tape to a friend, who hasn't listened
to the second side (so I don't know how it came out). But I listened
to the first side in the car coming to work--and discovered the
Chopin mazurka had interrupted the final movement of the Beethoven!
It was as though the tape had recorded to the end and had then rewound.
But the same day that that happened, I made ANOTHER tape (almost
entirely CDs) right after it, and it came out fine.
As for the CD that I was trying to record when the deck started
shutting down on me--it was the Sutherland/Pavarotti "Il Trovatore"
which is anything but a quiet work full of pianissimi. From what
the two of you have said, I'm afraid the problem must be with the
deck.
I have one other question: one of you mentioned that the Dragon
has a special bias setting for metal tapes. My unit has no such
thing on it--the instruction book divides tapes into two (three?)
categories which you choose when you set the bias. But the Nakamichi
metal tape doesn't appear in the list. The top of the line Nakamichi
tape uses a setting of 120mus; the other categories use 70. I've
been picking the category labeled (in Roman numerals) II. Does that
sound like the wrong decision?
Thanks for your help,
Jack Truslow
P.S. If you'd like to communicate directly about this, send me MAIL
at DELNI::TRUSLOW.
|