[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference marvin::uk_music

Title:The UK Music Conference
Notice:Welcome (back) to UK_MUSIC on node MARVIN.
Moderator:RDGENG::CROOK
Created:Mon Mar 28 1988
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1381
Total number of notes:39269

637.0. "The perfect artist" by SHAPES::BROWNM (This is MY decade!) Sat Mar 24 1990 11:45

    This note for our opinions of what an artist/group should be.  Question
    to be asked are things like, should you release loads of formats?,
    should you do what you/your fans/your record company want?,  should you
    vary your style?, should you appear on Sat morning kids TV?, etc.
    
    How about this?  You have loads of demo tapes, say 40 songs that you
    like.  Your first single almost flopped and the second made the top 75
    and you have a cult following.  The first 2 records were indie/guitar
    based with a touch of crossover.  It's now time for an LP.  But you
    also like classical music, House, pop and were a big Yazzoo fan in the
    early eighties.  You've done songs in all these moulds and you like
    them.  Should you release an LP with the various styles on it to show
    how clever you are, but might lose your cult following, or should you
    do the indie LP and pretend to progress.  What do you do?
    
    I'm not sure if this is advice wanted for future planning, or just
    fantasising?
    
    
    matty
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
637.1I didn't get to where I am today......WOTVAX::MOOREPI hate having to balance my cheque book !Mon Mar 26 1990 11:357
Those artists who seem to forget who they owe there rise to fame to, really
annoy me. Roland Gift - why are you so dour and aloof ? (Having said that I
like Fine Young Cannibals !)


I think the French & Saunders Pop Group sketches sum it all up. Did a good 
job of taking Bros off !!. 
637.2SHAPES::BROWNMThis is MY decade!Fri Mar 30 1990 13:0110
    A Question:  Is it right to release lots of different items, you know,
    all these limited editions and poster packs?  Is it a rip off, or is it
    giving us what we want?
    
    Personally I'm sick of having to buy three 12" for all the mixes of a song. 
    Why don't they just buying them all on the one 12"?  I know the answer
    to that!
    
    
    matty
637.3Thunderblaster Mega-Dub Acappello ReplyXSTACY::PATTISONHot on the heels of loveFri Mar 30 1990 13:599
    
    I'm personally fed up with it.. I like to collect all recordings by my
    favourite artists, but in some cases its just not worth it. After all,
    the artists themselves often only actually perform stuff ONCE, its the
    production team that make up all the different mixes.
    
    Imagine collecting all of Frankie Goes to Hollywood... 
    
    Dave
637.4I blame the Greedy of the world....SUBURB::COLEJA Very very very boring accountant.Fri Mar 30 1990 14:0217
    They just cater for people like you Matty....
    
    I mean why do you want ALL the ltd editions groups put out ? And
    why DO they put them out...I suspect close examination reveals a
    viscious circle....
    
    Matty, do you imagine that remix no 462 of West End Girls is going
    to be valuable or somthing....My advice, stop collecting records,
    just listen to the music and enjoy it....Who cares if they will/will
    not be valuable in years to come....You are probably not expert
    in records enough, and is it worth sitting on a virtually unplayed
    record for n-1 years before it rises in value.....
    
    
    Juju
    xxxx
    
637.5JUMBLY::OCONNORThe weekend's not over here...Fri Mar 30 1990 14:101
    Try the remix of Lou Reed's "Metal Machine Music".
637.6SHAPES::BROWNMThis is MY decade!Fri Mar 30 1990 14:208
    OK next question:
    
    Should it be crime to put old singles, or LP tracks on b-sides?  ex. 
    Madonna's "I Know It" has been on 3 of her 25 singles.  That's a rip
    off surely!
    
    
    matty
637.7Streetmaster Beat-Box lightning Disco Mix replyXSTACY::PATTISONHot on the heels of loveFri Mar 30 1990 14:2111
    
    I personally can't fathom why a blue vinyl copy of "Bohemian Rhapsody"
    is worth fifty times more than a bog standard black one, just because
    they only made 250 copies. 
    
    If artists want to please their most devoted collectors they should 
    leave all 45 rpm releases off of albums. This means all their output
    becomes 'collectable' and has a value. It also means your not wasting
    your money buying recordings you already have.  
    
    Dave
637.8I love that last title!!SHAPES::BROWNMThis is MY decade!Fri Mar 30 1990 14:236
    RE.-1
    
    Why do you own more than 1 pair of shoes?
    
    
    matty
637.9Wop your wad in your walletXSTACY::PATTISONHot on the heels of loveFri Mar 30 1990 14:3110
    
    Just thought of an example...
    
    Joy Division never duplicated recordings, (while they existed). Until
    the recent compilation LP released by Factory, early Joy Division
    records were very valuable. Now that all these recordings are
    available on CD, I doubt if you'd get 50% of the going price 3 years
    ago. Now, as a collector, that makes me fairly annoyed. 
     
    Dave
637.10JUMBLY::OCONNORThe weekend's not over here...Fri Mar 30 1990 14:395
    B-b-b-b-b-but Dave...music is for your ears, not for your pocket.

    That is, unless you want to work in the business.

    - Tim
637.11shoes?XSTACY::PATTISONHot on the heels of loveFri Mar 30 1990 14:4110
    
    RE .8
    
    > Why do you own more than 1 pair of shoes?
    
    I'm not sure I see your point... all my pairs of shoes are DIFFERENT.
    As far as wear and tear is concerned, play the record once, tape it,
    put it in a plastic sleeve, file it away with the rest..
    
    Dave
637.12Not what I meantXSTACY::PATTISONHot on the heels of loveFri Mar 30 1990 14:488
    
    >B-b-b-b-b-but Dave...music is for your ears, not for your pocket.
    >That is, unless you want to work in the business.

    Of course it is. What annoyed me was that I bought when the prices were
    still high! 
    
    Dave
637.13Different shoes/different mixesSHAPES::BROWNMThis is MY decade!Fri Mar 30 1990 15:0313
    Dave,  The shoes thing is like the different mixes thing.  You don:t
    need lots of pairs of shoes.  You only need 2 pairs of trousers, but we
    all like the change, we like to look different from time to time.  Just
    like I like different mixes, or different covers.  I get a big thrill
    out of hearing a new mix of something.  Like when there's an LP track
    that I really like, and I can't wait for it to be a single.  Then
    you're going to get a long version that you can dance to.  I suppose
    you either like different mixes or you're a song only matters type.
    
    
    
    matty
    ps.  An Ideal For Living is still worth a fortune isn't it?
637.14Matty, you get paid too muchXSTACY::PATTISONHot on the heels of loveFri Mar 30 1990 15:1515
    
    Re .13
    
    >like I like different mixes, or different covers.
    
    Different covers? I wonder if you bought all 12 copies of Ian Dury's
    "Do it yourself" wrapped in different styles of wallpaper.
    
    >Then you're going to get a long version that you can dance to.  
    
    How about playing the short version twice?
    
    Only Kidding!!
    
    Dave :-)
637.15WELMTS::GREENBMoved to topic 83Fri Mar 30 1990 15:251
    Dance?? What's that???
637.16Picture discs not meant for playing !WOTVAX::MOOREPI hate having to balance my cheque book !Fri Mar 30 1990 15:4417
I personally don't think there should be any limit to the number of different 
formats of the same single. If someone is willing to squander on all possible 
editions, then let them. (I do it !)

However what does annoy is when you like a certain 7" in the charts, but you 
want to buy something more substantial like the 12" or CDS, and then the 7"
mix doesn't appear on the other formats.

The latest Q magazine reported that some record industry authority was from now 
on only going to allow 5 different formats for eligibilty into the charts.
So, after 7", 12", 12" remix, CDS and cassingle, is it going to mean goodbye
to picture discs, boxed singles and freebies ?

Once bought a 12" picture disc which I had to take back as it would not play 
because it was so warped. On returning to the shop, I was told "Picture discs 
are not really meant for playing" !

637.17SHAPES::BROWNMThis is MY decade!Fri Mar 30 1990 16:236
    I had a warped Picture Disc that I bought as the shop opened and the
    day of it's release.  I took it back 2 hours later and found they had
    sold out all 25 copies!
    
    
    matty
637.18A nation votesXSTACY::PATTISONShah BunMon Apr 02 1990 13:5447
    The top 500 most collectable artists were published in the April edition
of Record Collector magazine. This was compiled from a readers poll in which
you were invited to list the five artists you are most interested in from a
collectors point of view.

    The interesting point about this poll is that the magazine sells to quite
a broad cross section of the record buying public. Every form of popular (and
unpopular) music gets a look in. (By the way this magazine is published in the
UK). Here are the first 30 places: 

(Last years position in brackets)

 1  (1) The Beatles
 2  (4) David Bowie
 3  (6) The Rolling Stones
 4  (2) Queen
 5  (5) Elvis Presley
 6  (3) U2
 7  (9) Kate Bush
 8  (7) Pink Floyd
 9 (10) Bob Dylan
10 (26) Prince
11 (21) Jimi Hendrix
12 (20) Paul McCartney
13 (32) Pet Shop Boys
14 (17) The Who
15  (8) Bruce Springsteen
16 (13) John Lennon
17 (38) Madonna
18 (12) Buddy Holly
19 (15) Marc Bolan & T. Rex
20 (18) Jethro Tull
21 (29) Eric Clapton
22 (24) Frank Zappa/Mothers
23 (19) Cliff Richard
24 (23) Led Zeppelin
25  (-) The Stone Roses
26 (11) The Smiths
27 (22) R. E. M.
28 (45) Erasure
29 (28) New Order
30 (16) Genesis 
    
    Note: the Beatles scored more than twice as many votes as David Bowie.
    
    Dave
637.19Tail-EndersXSTACY::PATTISONShah BunMon Apr 02 1990 19:1814
    .. and the last ten
    
    491   (-) Guy Mitchell
    492   (-) Doris Day
    493   (-) Atomic Rooster
    494 (246) Kevin Ayers
    495   (-) Jeff Healy
    496   (-) The Purple Helmets
    497   (-) Joe Satriani
    498 (441) X-Ray Spex
    499 (446) Foreigner
    500   (-) Boston
    
    Dave
637.20PEKING::GLYNNPRichard Nixon *is* Mr. EdTue Apr 03 1990 22:0610
    
    matty,
    
    Instead of spending all your hard earned money (and we all know
    how hard you work ;-)) on mixes, why not get yourself a couple of
    decks, a fader and a few other things and do it yourself?
    
    I'd be interested to hear the output..
    
    Paul
637.21I 2nd that!YUPPY::WILDERDPARTYMANWed Apr 04 1990 10:408
    RE -1 
    
      Yes Matty ,
    
    I can recomend this idea . I do something similiar with a portastudio,
    a small sampler and some effects. Fun on rainy days!!
    
    Davidf
637.22I plan to be up there some day!SHAPES::BROWNMPure moron!Wed Apr 04 1990 13:1020
    I do!
    
    I have a couple of guitars, one electric, one classical, and a consumer
    (ie. not pro) keyboards.  At present I'm saving (ie. cutting down on
    record spending) for a Roland D20 keyboard.  Then I want some drums! 
    I've given myself 2 years (I'll be 22) to either complete a high
    quality demo tape, or have a live set put together.  Then it's `Look
    out world, here I come!'.
    
    This topic is research!  I'm not as stupid as my spelling mistake show.
    
    Next question;
    
    Is it ok to play live using sequenced music, ie. with live guitar or
    keyboard and vocals over the top, or would I have have to hire people
    to gain respect?  Answers on a postcard please.
    
    
    matty_who_has_to_work_hard_now_'cause_he'll_get_sacked_otherwise
    
637.23Go for itXSTACY::PATTISONHelp m'boab.Fri Apr 06 1990 09:5314
    
    >Is it ok to play live using sequenced music, ie. with live guitar or
    >keyboard and vocals over the top, or would I have have to hire people
    >to gain respect?  Answers on a postcard please.
    
    Well, one of the best live bands I've seen are (believe it or not)
    SOFT CELL who did more or less what you just described. In fact its
    fair to say that their live performances were much *better* than
    anything they ever put on vinyl. (Soft Cell, for those who don't 
    remember, consisted of Marc Almond and Dave Ball). It was, however
    impossible to tell what was being played 'live' and what wasn't at
    times, but *who cares?*
    
    Dave
637.24WOTVAX::HARRISCJust the factsFri Apr 06 1990 13:348
   > Well, one of the best live bands I've seen are (believe it or not)
   > SOFT CELL who did more or less what you just described. 
    
    Is this the time when Almond fanted on stage????  
    I think it was due to him drinking too much! 8-)
    
    Craig..
    
637.25PhewXSTACY::PATTISONHelp m'boab.Fri Apr 06 1990 14:1410
    
>    Is this the time when Almond fanted on stage????  
     
    Did you mean to say fainted? Or farted? I didnt notice hime do either,
    but I wasnt really *that* close to the stage.
    
    ;-)
    
    Dave    
    
637.262 pints...Shirt lifting stuff!WOTVAX::HARRISCJust the factsFri Apr 06 1990 14:242
    I actually ment fainted 8-), apparantly he drank too much (or should I
    say swollowed) and he had to have his stomach pumped.
637.27yech!XSTACY::PATTISONHelp m'boab.Fri Apr 06 1990 14:304
    Actually I remember the incident! I also remember that what he drank
    wasn't alcohol.. but lets not go in to that (!)
    
    Dave
637.28yuck!CHEFS::DALLISONThe return of the bald avengerSun Apr 08 1990 22:034
    
    Aww...
    
    I remember that <gag>.
637.29Fainted love? I had to say that!SHAPES::BROWNMHe&#039;s Gonna Step On YouMon Apr 09 1990 13:241
    
637.30Re: .27SHAPES::WILLIAMSJ1Don&#039;t blame me.......Thu Apr 12 1990 13:365
    I remember hearing about that too but I couldn't think of a polite way 
    of putting in notes.  Thanks, you solved my problem!
    
    Julia
    
637.31PEKING::GLYNNPYou wanna mess with the kid?Thu Apr 12 1990 15:544
    
    So what's wrong with drinking too much?
    
    Paul
637.32there was a party in his mouth and everyone was...DASXPS::SASCHROEDERFrom the Moon we&#039;re comedyThu Apr 12 1990 23:504
    
     re. last few,
    
       Didn't Rod-The Bod-Stewart pull that manuever ,too?
637.33Work it out for yourself!WOTVAX::HARRISCJust the factsFri Apr 13 1990 11:593
    -1
    
    No, Rod had been drinking alcohol, Mark certainly hadn't!