T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
95.1 | An uneducated mans opinion. . . | SUBURB::DALLISON | those negative vibes. . . | Wed Jun 01 1988 17:27 | 18 |
|
I agree Andy. The damage caused by those football "fans" is diabolical,
causing damage and violence that mean each match has to be supervised
by an army of riot Police, all at the tax payer's expense.
But a hippie festival, well from the very little I know about them
(No Declan I ain't a hippie :-) they seem to only be interested
in Piece and Pot (what more does one need ;-).
Somebodys threatening to stop a non-violent festival and there's
nothing much anybody can do but if somebody tried to stop the FA
Cup Final then....well it just could not be done.
Stone henge *is* a good place for it coz J.H. Christ said something
in the bible about dancing, but if the main man wanted us to play
in FA Cup Finals then, well he would have given us PUMA Football
boots for feet wouldn't he peeps?
|
95.2 | True ! but not so ! | CHEFS::LAWSONM | You Can't SEE God with earthly eyes | Wed Jun 01 1988 17:49 | 24 |
| Re -.1
I'm not sure if you where serious or not so please forgive if I
have jumped in with two feet, when I should not have done 8-).
But....
> Stone henge *is* a good place for it coz J.H. Christ said something
> in the bible about dancing, but if the main man wanted us to play
> in FA Cup Finals then, well he would have given us PUMA Football
> boots for feet wouldn't he peeps?
The Summer festival is not a Christian festival, if I remember
correctly it is a druid Holy day. Either the sun or the moon. I
personally am not in favour of the gathering, perhaps out of lack
of info ?
Yes I agree that David (the second King of Israel) did dance when
the Ark of the covenment was returned. He was however "Dancing before
the Lord" as an act of praise and worship. I cannot see that being
the case at the mentioned festival ??
Mark
|
95.3 | Lord of the Dance? | MALLET::BARKER | Nigel Barker | Wed Jun 01 1988 18:01 | 14 |
| Re :< Note 95.2 by CHEFS::LAWSONM "You Can't SEE God with earthly eyes" >
-< True ! but not so ! >-
> Yes I agree that David (the second King of Israel) did dance when
> the Ark of the covenment was returned. He was however "Dancing before
> the Lord" as an act of praise and worship. I cannot see that being
> the case at the mentioned festival ??
Whyever not?
Don't think David was a Christian either mind you.
Nigel
|
95.4 | can't see the wood for the trees. . . . . | SUBURB::DALLISON | those negative vibes. . . | Wed Jun 01 1988 18:25 | 10 |
|
Whilst I confess to not being a particularly religious chap I fail
to see what difference it makes who one is dancing in front of,
beit Lord or Juke-box. ;-)
.2� ..I cannot see that being the case at the mentioned festival ??
WHY NOT???
FWIW, why does no-one take me seriously?
|
95.5 | | 45384::IBL | while you still can! | Wed Jun 01 1988 18:30 | 12 |
|
Is Stonehenge "public" land? I was under the impression that it
had been annexed by the National Trust a long time ago. Tourists
these days can't even get near it, and to be as close as the NT
permits, you even have to *pay*. Madness. Mind you, the decay
that the stones experienced due to aerosol paint, knives, etc. was
real enough, and it doesn't matter *how* peaceful the hippies might
be as a group, there will *always* be the minority who want to ruin
things for everyone else, and that's why they won't allow people
'inside' the monument.
Ian!
|
95.6 | OK since you raised the subject ! | CHEFS::LAWSONM | You Can't SEE God with earthly eyes | Wed Jun 01 1988 18:35 | 20 |
| RE last few
Sorry I *WILL* take you seriously !
You raised the issue of dance/religion I didn't. The reason I replied
is that as a Born-again Christian [ Oh no not one of those !! 8-)]
I dislike and feel that it is wrong to use the Lord's name in vain.
Linking Jesus Christ [plse not the lack of and "H."] name with this
festival does to my mind do just that.
It is not a "CHRISTIAN" festival and therefore should be recognised
as such. I would not support a "PAGAN" festival.
I do however realise that not everyone sees things the way I do
8-)
Regards
Mark
|
95.7 | | CHEFS::HASTONM | Truth and Extentsionality | Wed Jun 01 1988 19:40 | 28 |
| -< Druids :== Charlatans >-
I've noticed some references to Druids as being somehow religiously
"legitimate" in using S'henge for their activities.
Now, this is OK, anyone is able to claim a "special place" for their
rites (or lefts for that matter) but I seem to remember that these
Druids were the Invention of the Victorians (along with the vast
majority of Tartans) and don't precede that era.
Is this a free festival? If so, then the NT may be a wee bit wary
about letting this event take place as these events usually leave
a sizeable quantity of debris behind (mostly bags & bags of dead
brain cells 8-) ) and there may not be a *legally enforcable* way
to get the organisers to clean up.
Why the big deal about S'henge? It's a nice spot sure {was there
when you could walk around between the stones for free - and no,
I wasn't wearing animal skins at the time} but there's no way you'd
see the stones at a festival. Plenty other spots.
Not that I've much time for the NT, they seem far too busy preserving
Upper-Class Mansions as example of Great English Architecture than
doing much else. I'd have though exlempifying houses built by Slave
money would be considered bad taste. Bit like re-furbishing der
F�hrer's bunker in Berlin.
That's enuf Rat-holing for now methinks...
|
95.8 | Avalon where are you | SUBURB::BURKEG | Ovation axe man | Fri Jun 03 1988 11:07 | 20 |
|
Yes i'm in favour of a summer music festival I dont care where
it is as long as the music and atmosphere are as good as the previous
Glastonburys that i've been to.
FWIW the Reading rock festival isn't worth a spit as the music
nowdays is all heavy and thus does not lend itself to a mixed audience.
(I do like heavy metal, but not three solid days of it). The audiences
that generally attend ReadingRock tend toward the more violent sections
of our society.
The Glastonbury festivals have a much more varied lineup of
artists and ive heard evrything from the Dubliners to Osibisa there.
The event is frequented by a reasonable cross section of society
and is far more relaxed and enjoyable.
Gavin
|
95.9 | Hey Flares are in fashion ,it says so in the Face | RDGCSS::LIPSZYC | | Fri Jun 03 1988 17:07 | 21 |
| What is every ones problem , a bunch of stoned hippies want to hang
out , drink heavily, listen to music ,smoke you know what and indulge
in a bit of free love and nakedness . Well thats okay with me ,
if it keeps them off the streets , no problem . What is Stonehenge
but a bunch of big old rocks in a circular pattern, not very impressive
at all and definetly not worth breaking sweat over. In my poisonal
opinion i think the hipps would have more respect for it than people
give them credit for, after all most of them are university proffesors
and software engineers aren't they ? I think there not enough of
this free love and party feeling about at the moment , every one
is toooo serious , we should encourage this kind of groovy behaviour.
Perhaps a local government grant could be arranged to help the aged
old hippies in their endeavours and to arrange a minibus to and
from their old folks homes.
Eran
ps . Does anybody FEEL the same way as me about the state of the
nation......
pps . twelve pints please :-)
|
95.10 | why stone henge ? | GALLOP::COOPERM | | Fri Jun 03 1988 17:50 | 20 |
| as far as I can see a music festival is for loads of people to gather together
in one place , listen to lots of bands, meet people and generaly have a good
time for a few days. Now this sounds like a pretty good idea to me, but why does
this have to take place at stonehenge ?
Whatever stonehenge was origionally designed for I doubt it was as a concert
venue, and using it as such cannot do the site any good , however carefull
we all are.
It seems to me that some people just like being awkward - "Big Brother doesn't
want us to go there, so we will show how anarchic we can be, by going".
Sorry if this sounds like a bit of a bleat but I dont see the relationship
between an ancient monument which may or may not have had religious purpose in
pre history (the druids are a pretty recent invention aren't they) and a music
festival.
Maybee the National Trust could do the decent thing and set aside some of their
less controvertial (and less prone to damage) property ,to be used as a
permenant home for an annual festival of music/good times/ peace/ etc (I always
think that etc is the best bit ! ). How about some thoughts about that idea ?
|
95.11 | tuppence | MARVIN::HEALEY | Brendan Healey, WACE | Wed Jun 08 1988 17:08 | 16 |
| I'd say .-1 hit the nail on the head. For the majority of attendees
the festival is a good excuse for a good time, and there are no
religious connections with the event. The druids presence should
not be confused with that of the 30000 or so hippies that camp out
for days on end. The problem that the authorities face is that by
allowing the festival to take place, they are in fact condoning
law breaking in a big way due to the large amounts of illegal
substances openly on sale. I think that the festival as it has
existed in previous years is too anarchic to fit into our society,
where you have to pay for what you get. Since the war much common
land has fallen into private hands, so there isn't anywhere to
hold the event without mass trespass. I think that toning down the
whole thing a bit, charging a small entry fee to pay for sanitation
and medical presence is the way forwards for this.
Brendan.
|
95.12 | a bit hypocritical ? | RDGCSS::STONE | Distant, Alone, Beneath the platinum stars ... | Wed Jun 29 1988 14:01 | 4 |
| re .6,
Do you celebrate Christmas ? From my RK lessons I seem to remember
that it was 'borrowed' from the pagans .....
|
95.13 | Can you expand please? | CHEFS::LAWSONM | Finite cann't comprehend Infinite | Wed Jun 29 1988 14:35 | 11 |
| Re .12
Sorry how is it hypocritical; There was a time when around 25th
Dec pagans did celebrate xyz; Yes the New testament church celebrates
Christ's birth at Christmas time; where's the connection.
sorry you will have to help me on this one ?
as always.
Mark
|
95.14 | Please put this away | SUBURB::BURKEG | Ovation axe man | Thu Jun 30 1988 10:30 | 8 |
|
SET FLAME=ON
'scuse me mr moderator.
This is a MUSIC conference. please find somewhere else to argue
about the pros and cons of religion.
SET FLAME=OFF
|
95.15 | see note 130.* :-) | GAO::DKEATING | Reminiscing about tomorrow | Thu Jun 30 1988 10:38 | 1 |
|
|
95.16 | How's *this* for a rathole....8^) | STOPIT::IBL | an Electric Monk on a bored horse | Thu Jun 30 1988 10:42 | 8 |
|
A funny thing happened on a trip through my music collection...
I have songs by "The Jesus & Mary Chain", "The Christians", "The
Mission", "The Bible", "The Church". Good grief, and you want us
to avoid mentioning religion in this conference? 8^)
Ian!
|
95.17 | annuva rathole!! | GYPSC::CHISHOLM | Dem Tambourines! | Thu Jun 30 1988 10:54 | 10 |
|
re .16
I got a CD by The Bible a few days ago, I'd never heard of them,
but because of headphones dangling all over the shop, listened
to a couple of tracks, great stuff. Is this their first album_?,
have they had any hits ?, you get a bit out of touch after a bit.
Any info appreciated... Doug.
|
95.18 | Rathole Deepens.... | STOPIT::IBL | an Electric Monk on a bored horse | Thu Jun 30 1988 11:27 | 16 |
|
Doug,
"Eureka" is the current album by The Bible, and is (I imagine)
the CD you've got? This is not their debut though, the first album
is entitled "Walking The Ghost Back Home" and was released on an
independent label (don't know any details about the label, or the
date of release though), and has been touted as an even better album
than "Eureka" by various members of the music press.
From "Walking The Ghost back Home" they released one single that
I know of, "Mahalia", which (in 12" form) also features on the CD
single of their latest release, "Crystal Palace" (from "Eureka").
That's all I know. They *are* a good band though, aren't they?
Ian!
|
95.19 | Don't forget Graceland | AYOU30::PAULC | Red Devils and Honest Men | Thu Jun 30 1988 11:39 | 10 |
| Ian,
I've got a double single by The Bible with "Graceland" as the main
A-side, a live version of "Glorybound(?)" on its B-side, "Mahalia"
as the A-side of the second single (is this making sense?) and
something else which escapes me as its B-side. "Graceland" was
easily my favourite song of last year - I agree that The Bible
are SUPERB! Now to get hold of "Eureka"...
Paul
|
95.20 | Rathole ? What Rathole ? | AYOU11::S_GOUDIE | We could be heroes | Thu Jun 30 1988 11:43 | 10 |
|
How can you forget 'Graceland' ,once heard that is .
I'd agree with you Paul ,one of the best of last year .
By all accounts (although you can't believe too much you read )the
new album isn't up to the same standard - I'll decide when I manage
to hear it .
Stuart.
|
95.21 | Rodentpit then..... | 45384::IBL | an Electric Monk on a bored horse | Thu Jun 30 1988 11:54 | 13 |
|
Ah yes well but....ok ok, sorry guys, I should have mentioned
"Graceland" which also features on the extended release of
"Crystal Palace". Although I've heard quite a few songs from the
album(s) (mostly courtesy of Liz Kershaw...!) I haven't purchased
them yet....*but* I shall do so this very lunchtime with the cash
I have suddenly printed...I mean earned.
"The Golden Mile" is one of my fave tracks, if I'm honest about
it. Love the rhythm, a great driving song.
Ian!
|
95.22 | Still a rathole... | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | Oh God, I've killed a hippy | Thu Jun 30 1988 12:09 | 8 |
| My sister is a Bible nut and regularly forces me to listen to the
LP with Graceland and all that on, by playing it bloody loud all
the time. Incidentally, she wrote to the boys in the band asking
questions etc. and received back a really lengthy and detailed
reply. I was very impressed by this. Not only can they play a bit,
but they've got a bit of time for the fans aswell.
Ian
|
95.23 | | GYPSC::CHISHOLM | Dem Tambourines! | Thu Jun 30 1988 12:15 | 8 |
|
re .18
Thanks Ian, Yes Eureka is the one I've got, I'll look out for
'Walking the Ghost Back Home' next time I'm home.
Cheers... Doug.
|
95.24 | Excuse me for butting in! | SUBURB::DANCEA | Hacking is my business... | Thu Jun 30 1988 13:29 | 16 |
| Ahem,
I did intentionally set this note up for discussions around the Summer
Solstice Celebrations and Stonhenge.
If you so wish to continue your discussions about other topics please
create a new note as this one is swaying off it's primary note.
If you would like to make a contribution to this topic please re-read note
.0.
Thanks
\Andy
PS. If you so continue to discuss other topics I shall write lock it.
|
95.25 | set mod/hat=on | RDGENG::KEDMUNDS | $ no !fm2r, no comment | Thu Jun 30 1988 14:47 | 5 |
| The sentiments expressed in the last note are supported by me. Please
try to keep to the basenote topic, or feel free to start a new topic
if appropriate.
Keith
|
95.26 | LOUD & LONG but worth it | COMET::SMITHKR | | Tue Feb 07 1989 22:14 | 32 |
| GREETINGS !!
yes it's one of those loud , .... aliens from america . sorry no
loud checked jackets or such ....
anyway . sounds like a familier (sp) problem . red rocks in colorado
is a natural ampitheater , with a extremely beautiful park surrounding
it . a great place to camp out before a concert and do what ever
your heart desires ...
locals are doing ther best to stop concerts and such ; due to the
LOUD music , and the type of folk attending these gatherings .
we as a group of concert goers do our best to stop stupid folk from
destroying the natural beauty of the area . but beasts will be
beasts....
what finally slowed the controversy has been that they ( the beasts
)
oops....
have a major portion of THEIR music removed from the schedule of
shows
beings that your festival happen once a year at a place where some
people only dream of seeing . the potential damage to a place of
potential interest is enough of a reason to move the shows to another
place to have fun .
consider coming to visit the rockies only ot find that we have become
so bored with it that it has been spray painted to look like ouir
lovely new york subways .
give it some thought before you accidently let someone DESTROY your
unique landscape .
thanx for listening
kevin
|
95.27 | Henge Winge | ODIHAM::MAILROOM | | Tue May 16 1989 17:08 | 38 |
| There is that side to it , but the difference (I suspect) at Stone
Henge is that the "hippies"do no actual damage to the stones . Most
of them camp at least half a mile away and only (try to) visit the
stones once or twice during the festival .
The stones were not erected to be looked at from behind a rope fifty
yards away - they were meant to be touched and admired . the Heritage
people make over one and a half million pounds a year from charging
people to look at the stones from afar - most of this goes on
renovating Lord such-and-such's crumbling old mansion which gets
visited by about three people a year .
The hippy festival went on for ten years with little or no trouble
but come the eleventh year , when some anachronistic law said the
event would be legal , the cops screamed in with riot gear .Until
this unnecessary police intervention the festival had always been
a peaceful , troublefree (admittedly bombed-out)event but since
then (1985) there have been police-instigated clashes every year
The so-called druids have no right to the stones whatsoever .This
bunch first appeared at the end of the last century , and the
original druids didn't exist until a thousand years after the
completion of the Henge .
So what's all the fuss about ? Basically it's probably something
to do with the fact that the authorities can't bear to see such
a large and popular group of people beating the system so
successfully .
If enough people keep going the govt. will have to back down .
There is already a growing body of people against the excessive
force employed by the police , and that's as it should be .
If anyone wants to enjoy a good few hazy crazy days in June
get to Stone Henge . The rocks'll love you for it .
Sorry to go on
but
I'm
feeling
mmmmmelllowww
PETE <8-k (2 at once)
|
95.28 | Dates? | WELMTS::GREENB | Kim and Bob, joint MBNITC | Wed May 17 1989 12:47 | 3 |
| When's it start, Pete?
Bob
|