[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference gyro::internet_toolss

Title:Internet Tools
Notice:Report ALL NETSCAPE Problems directly to [email protected].rnet? Read note 448.L for beginner information.
Moderator:teco.mro.dec.com::tecotoo.mro.dec.com::mayer
Created:Fri Jun 25 1993
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4714
Total number of notes:40609

4663.0. "Trying to use AltaVista Search Private eXtensions" by CHOWDA::GLICKMAN (writing from Newport,RI) Fri May 09 1997 11:13

    Installing AltaVista Search Private eXtension 1.0 on Windows NT 4.0 on
    an Alphaserver 4100 at a customer site and so far we have found the 
    following:
    
    	(1) The on-line Handbook seems incomplete.  For example, if we click
            on Configuring the Index and then click on Making the Index 
    	    Available for Queries the anchor associcated with that link
            is not there.  Same for Page Gathering and Memory Polices.
            There are others in the Troubleshooting section as well.
    
        (2) Is there hard copy documentation available?
    
    	(3) We are trying to index the customer's intranet and in a
            half hour period the Server Status seems to stay on 
            Cumulative Statistics of Pages Fetched: 1 and Web
            Servers: 1.   The recent Activity is all zeros.
            Are we doing something wrong?
    
           We put in for rules to include *.users.domain.name
           For the starting URL we put in http://customers.webserver.domain/
    
           We also tried to search www.digital.com from here and that
           worked.
    
           We know the customer has about 1000 small documents using
           Process Software's Purveyor as the Web Server on a VAX 7740.
    
           When we look at Purveyor's log we only see AltaVista hit the
           home page no others and the time for that hit is about when I
           stated the search.
    
           Appreciating any inputs.
    
           Thanks.
    
       
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
4663.1Indexing problemsNNTPD::"[email protected]"Andrew PywellFri May 09 1997 14:0852
Hi,
   I have Emailed you a copy of the online handbook.

As regards to the indexing:

    Is the customer using WINS?  If so you will need to use the "nodots" rule!
    This looks unlikely since it's a Vax you are indexing.

    Does the homepage use frames.  This is not supported till V2.0 (Search97)
    which is due out next month on NT and July for Digital UNIX & Solaris.

    Is there a Robots Exclusions Standards file blocking Scooter?
    e.g.
      http://office.division.domain/robots.txt

    You should really be asking your questions at

      http://support.altavista.software.digital.com/ISBUTECHSUP/nfintro.htm

   BUT don't expect too much, it'll take a couple of days to get an answer
   and in recent weeks I've seen some answers that were "incorrect"!

A few other things you might try

   Give a start URL that is the actual home page
   e.g.
      http://office.division.domain/index.html

   Add a rule giving the IP Address of the server
   e.g.
      include 16.123.234.456   or   include 16.234.*

   Give the start URL using the Servers IP Address
   e.g.
      http://16.123.234.456/index.html


   Start the indexing again and watch VERY carefully the DOS trace output
   looking for any errors or "rules problems"

    Make the Scooter more agressive. Depending on your settings, it may be
    waiting for a long time after a read success or failure.  Unlikely!

    If you're only indexing one web server then set the Virtual Memory to
    "Single Web Server" otherwise you will be running with superflous
    threads and may actually degrade performance.

Good Luck

Andrew
 
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
4663.2Ugh ... frames!!!CHOWDA::GLICKMANwriting from Newport,RIFri May 09 1997 16:318
    re .1
    
    It turns out the home page does have frames.
    
    Think it's possible for my customer to get a beta of version 2??
    
    Thanks!