Conference gyro::internet_toolss

        This note touched upon a pet peeve of mine regarding the
        AltaVista public search site.  I recently gave them the
        following feedback about a problem in adding a URL:

Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 17:12:05 -0800
From: Bob Fleischer <[email protected]>
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp NSIS
To: [email protected]
Subject: "too many URLs..."

My son is developing a web site, and he wanted to get it listed on a
variety of search engines and web directories.  The URL is
http://www.tiac.net/users/rjf/fizbin.html .

He was able to get it listed by Lycos, Excite, InfoSeek, Yahoo, and
several other services suggested by SubmitIt! (SubmitIt was suggested by
AltaVista, in fact).

However, he was not able to get AltaVista to accept his URL -- the
response was "Too many URLs at that site have been submitted---sorry."

Such a rejection wouldn't have hurt half as bad if it came from a site
which had no claim to being the biggest and fastest site built with
technology having the highest capacity -- but it seems absurd that
AltaVista of all sites should be the only one to say "I'm sorry, I've
reached my capacity!"

I'm sure that there are a lot of submissions from a site such as 
www.tiac.net -- they are, after all, a large ISP hosting thousands of
users and businesses.  No other search engine had a problem with that,
however.

-- 
Bob Fleischer
Digital Equipment Corporation, Network and Systems Integration Services
110 Spit Brook Road (ZKO1-1/J33), Nashua, NH 03062       (603) 881-0426
[email protected]             http://www.tiac.net/users/rjf/

        and their response:

Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 09:09:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Alta Vista Support <[email protected]>
To: Bob Fleischer <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: "too many URLs..."

From [email protected] Mar 18 09:01:47 1997
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 09:00:51 -0800
From: Ty Tressitte <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]

In order to help ensure our users retrieve a fair and unbiased selection 
of relevant pages, we have had to limit submission of pages from a 
provider, site or individual user that fall into the following categories:

1. Submissions that are designed to limit our ability to rank pages 
accurately.

2. Duplicate and near duplicate pages that both utilize excessive storage 
and reduce the number of relevant search results.

3. Excessive amounts of pages submitted from a given provider, site or 
individual in a day.

You can try submitting your page in the late afternoon when the
submission limits are reset.


Regards,

AltaVista Support

    
    	Yeah, I just tried submitting
    
    	http://www.icanect.net
    
    	and got the same "too many URL's" error.
    

Thanks for the quick replies.

So I guess I need to send an e-mail to AltaVista Support and ask them to reset
the submission limits for www.icanect.net?
    

    
    >So I guess I need to send an e-mail to AltaVista Support and ask them
    >to reset the submission limits for www.icanect.net?
    
    
    Yes.
    
    What is confusing is that your customer did not say they received the 
    "too many URLs at this site" error when they originally submitted their 
    URL.  It could be that the URL was accepted, but for some reason could 
    not be fetched (network busy, server was down due to the renovation of
    the site,etc).  Under those circumstances the URL is not added.
    
    The AltaVista Search Site has had problems with spamming...submitting a 
    large number of pages to the index in the hopes that it will increase your 
    appearance and ranking.  I suspect that a/v views this as an ethical
    issue rather than a performance issue.  As they put it, 
    "Left unchecked, this behavior would make web indexes worthless".  It
    seems they attempt to solve this problem by putting a quota on URLs,
    and expect scooter to find the other pages.  Unfortunately this method
    does not take into consideration the many unique web pages
    which reside in directories on the same HTTP server (such as
    www.icanect.net and members.aol.com).  It is also possible that too
    many attempts have been made to add the
    http://www.icanect.net/kabbalah/ site that it now looks like an attempt
    to spam, and AltaVista is ignoring the site.
    
    You need to send mail to AltaVista Support alerting them of the problem
    so they can bypass the quota on your customer's behalf.
    
    Donna 
    

>     	Yeah, I just tried submitting
>     	http://www.icanect.net
>     	and got the same "too many URL's" error.

	What are you talking about Shawn?  1pm (when you posted your
	note) is not late afternoon if that's what you are refering to?
	And it's especially not late afternoon if it's Palo Alta time
	(add 3 hours for ET).

    
    	If I remember right, I posted that reply before reading the prev-
    	ious one with the time recommendation.
    
    	I guess I should of written it quicker.
    

    The "problem" with AV not indexing all of a site has become a public
    issue:
    
[ Forwarded message ]
    
>AltaVista also is not as deep a search engine as you might think.  The
>email below is from zdnet's "talkback" area.  The URL is
>
>http://www5.zdnet.com/anchordesk/talkback/talkback_11638.html
>
>The author reveals that AltaVista doesn't index all pages on a site --
>indeed, geocities.com, with 20,000+ pages, only has about 300 listed. 
>You can check this by doing a search for host:geocities.com on
>AltaVista.

    
    If this is true, I'm just as shocked as the writer above. I thought 
    that the original conversation by some DIGITAL researchers at 
    Left at Albuquerque about the idea for AltaVista was essentially 
    "index the entire Web". If the scope of the project has at some point 
    been scaled back, it seems to have been done without any public notice.
    
       erik

    
    	I'm not sure how often the index is updated, but whatever the time
    	span is it's too long.
    
    	All too often I get "not found" errors because the page has dis-
    	appeared since the index was last created.
    

    AltaVista has indexed only a handful of the ourworld.compuserve.com
    sites - my page there keeps getting dropped from AV's list.  The
    problem, as Louis Monier once explained to me, is that AV tries to be a
    "good citizen" and stops indexing a site if it is pulling down what it
    thinks are too many pages.
    
    One unfortunate side effect of people having difficulty getting URLs
    indexed is that some of them decide that the way to do it is to "spam"
    the Digital e-mail list with demands to get the site indexed.  One jerk
    set up a batch job to remail the same complaint to the entire list
    every day.
    
    (Another jerk decided that he DIDN'T want his site indexed - he refused
    all suggestions for how to do this on his own and blasted the e-mail
    list dozens of times a day with incoherent rantings.)
    
    Unfortunately, it seems that the AV people don't have adequate staff to
    respond to inquiries.
    
    					Steve

    
    re: not indexing the entire Web:
    
    I hear it's simply a budgetary problem--if AV were to index
    all known pages *and* keep the same responsiveness level it has today,
    it would take three times as many turboLasers as they use today 
    (12, each with max CPU boards?). 
    
    That's too bad. I might start using a search engine which does attempt
    to index all pages.
    
       erik

re Note 4577.10 by CIRCUS::GOETZE:

>     That's too bad. I might start using a search engine which does attempt
>     to index all pages.
  
        Yes -- indexing everything is AltaVista's claim to fame.

        (Yes, I understand that it was never possible to really index
        "everything", but one would expect that static, un-hidden
        pages would certainly be indexed.)

        Bob

    Also, AV only indexes pages its crawler can find (via links from
    other pages), correct? If I were an ISP, and allowed my users to have
    homepages at
    
    http://myisp.com/~joeuser/index.html
    
    Joe's page would never make it into AltaVista unless and until there
    was a link to get there from some page in AV's space (which, I
    expect, starts at large sites like Yahoo and works its way down?)
    Isolated groups of pages with no outside references just aren't
    going to make it.
    
    (I'm just guessing here; this may not be all that relevant to which
    pages get passed over... but it seems like another thing to consider.
    Spiders can only crawl; they can't jump.)
    

    I think AltaVista might save some space if they put a size limit on
    pages that it indexes.  More and more I'm seeing log files and other 
    data dumps get indexed.  Pages that are many many megs in size.  And
    since these contain SO MUCH information, they often pop up in search
    results even though they have nothing to do with what you're
    searching for.  
    
    I don't think it is unreasonable to ask that if a page is to be
    indexed, its size is kept to a reasonable size.  I don't know what
    that number is, but it's certainly less than 1 meg.  Maybe 200K. 
    Lower? Higher?
    
    How about dumping pages that haven't been updated in over a year?
    
    Like others have said here, it's really a shame that AltaVista punishes
    people on large ISPs with lots of pages.  TIAC is a good example.  If
    some bozo on TIAC spammed the index, don't make everyone else pay for
    it.
    
    -Steve
    

>>    How about dumping pages that haven't been updated in over a year?

Bad idea.  There are a great many sources of information that do not change
over the years.  If someone were, for example, to supply the complete works of
Shakespeare over the web, there would be little reason to change the pages,
ever.

						Brian

    
    	RE: .12
    
    	That doesn't explain something like Geocities, though, which has
    	links to all of its pages on the main page.
    

re: .13

According to the book "The AltaVista Search Revolution" page 91, files over 
4MB are truncated.

-- Rob

    re: .14
    
    What "If"!
    
    >> If someone were, for example, to supply the complete works of
    >> Shakespeare over the web, 
    
    See:    http://the-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/works.html
    
    
    - 	stp

    It is possible to add your personal URL's of the form,
    www.network.com/~myusername
    
    At the bottom of the ALtaVista search page is an option
    Add Url. Just place your personal web page there and you're all set.
    
    I did so and showed up in Alta Vista the next day.
    
    Randy
    

But keep a watch out - it is likely to disappear after a month or two.

				Steve

    On the other hand, getting a page *out* of some of the other search
    engines is darn near impossible.  I have a page that was indexed in
    November.  A couple months ago I placed noindex meta tags and a robot
    file there, but it is STILL there, still showing a data of November.
    
    Some pages may get updated frequently, but not all.  Either that, or
    once a page is cataloged, when they go back, they only check if its
    there, and don't look for the meta tags or robot file during the
    refresh pass.
    
    jeb
    

 There are lots of dead links in the Altavista index, almost as if
 once an entity is indexed, it is never again checked.  More likely
 the memory algorithm is just overly sticky.  Sorry to .-1,  but the
 dead links I checked had been dead much longer than a couple of
 months, one appeared to have been taken down 10 months before 
 Altavista  pointed me there.

 Bruce

    
    I've never wanted a page of mine altavista'd.  But if I did, and
    I just found the owner of some page that was already altavista'd and I
    convinced that owner to link to my page from theirs, then wouldn't
    mine automatically be altavista'd within a week or two (how often does
    altavista do its crawl ?  How long does it take to crawl ?)
    
    Would this method work better than the direct-email method (which seems
    to dead end in too-many-requests error)
    
    /Eric