| Title: | WinNT-Clusters |
| Notice: | Info directories moved to DECWET::SHARE1$:[NT_CLSTR] |
| Moderator: | DECWET::CAPPELLOF |
| Created: | Thu Oct 19 1995 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 863 |
| Total number of notes: | 3478 |
Where can I find the SPD for version 1.1 of NT-Clusters?
Paul
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 709.1 | MSE1::PCOTE | press one now for personal name | Tue Mar 25 1997 13:03 | 4 | |
dir/title=spd yields note 190 and reply .3 says NO SPD exists. | |||||
| 709.2 | It has to have one | JULIET::SMITH_P | Thu Mar 27 1997 10:19 | 4 | |
Note 190 states not SPD exists for 1.0. How can a software product not
have an SPD describing the product and compatibility issues?
Paul
| |||||
| 709.3 | No it doesn't have to have one | MPOS01::naiad.mpo.dec.com::mpos01::cerling | I'[email protected] | Thu Mar 27 1997 10:34 | 8 |
I believe that argument is that this is being handled like any other PC-type product. We (Digital) have SPDs for our UNIX and VMS products, but are following the industry when it comes to PC products by not having an SPD. I agree that SPDs are nice, but I haven't found it to be a major drawback not to have one. tgc | |||||